About five o’clock, the vast mass of material set loose began to move.

At first the movement was slow, and there were repeated pauses. An old

man sitting at his door smoking his pipe, was told by a neighbour that

the mountain was falling. He thought there was plenty of time, and

went indoors to fill his pipe again; but his neighbour ran down the

valley, falling repeatedly by reason of the agitation of the ground,

and escaped with difficulty. When he looked back to the village, the

old man’s house had disappeared. In the space of about three minutes,

the vast mass, separated into two portions, had descended three miles,

sweeping everything before it. The smaller portion took a course

towards the foot of the Righi, destroying the hamlets of Spitzbuhl,

Ober and Unter Rothen. Its velocity was such as to carry enormous

fragments to a great height up the opposite mountain. A peasant who

survived the calamity, was engaged in cutting down a tree near his

house, when a noise like thunder arrested his attention; he felt the

ground tremble under his feet, and he was immediately thrown down by

a current of air. Retaining his presence of mind, a dreadful scene

presented itself; the tree he had been cutting down, his house, and

every familiar object, had disappeared, and an immense cloud of dust

enveloped him.

The ruin effected by the descent of the larger portion was more

terrible. It took the direction of the Lake of Lowertz. Among its first

victims were nine persons belonging to a party which had come from

Berne to climb to the top of the Righi. Besides the village of Goldau,

the adjacent villages of Bussingen and Hussloch, and three-fourths of

the village of Lowertz, were overwhelmed. But the destruction did not

stop here. The larger of the two portions filled up nearly one-fourth

of the Lake of Lowertz. The body of water thus displaced formed a wave

which swept over the little island of Schwanau in the lake, rising to

the height of seventy feet, besides doing a great deal of mischief

along the shore, especially to the village of Seewen.

By this disaster nearly five hundred persons lost their lives, and

damage was done to the amount of one hundred and twenty thousand

pounds. Of all the inhabitants, about twenty were taken alive from

the ruins. Two out of a family of seven were saved as by a miracle.

At the moment of the catastrophe the father was standing at his own

door with his wife and three children. Seeing the mass rolling towards

him, he caught up two of the children, bidding his wife follow him

with the third. Instead of doing so, however, she turned back into

the house to fetch the remaining child, Marianne, and Frances Ulrich,

the servant-maid. Frances seized the little girl by the hand, and was

leading her out, when the house, which was of timber, seemed to be torn

from its foundations, and to turn over and over like a ball, so that

she was sometimes on her head and sometimes on her feet. A storm of

dust made the day dark as night. The violence of the shock separated

her from the child, and she hung head downwards. She was squeezed and

bruised a good deal, and her face was much cut and very painful. After

some time she released her right hand, and wiped the blood from her

face. She then heard Marianne groaning, and calling ‘Frances, Frances!’

The child said that she was lying on her back among stones and bushes,

unable to rise; that her hands were at liberty, and that she could see

the daylight and the green fields. Frances had imagined that they were

buried a great depth under ground; and thought that the last day was

come.

After remaining in this state some hours, Frances heard a bell, which

she knew to be that of the village church of Steinen, calling the

survivors to prayer. The little girl was now crying bitterly from pain

and hunger; and the servant-maid tried in vain to comfort her. From

sheer exhaustion, however, the cry became weaker, and then ceased

entirely. Meanwhile, Frances herself was in a most painful position,

hanging with her head downwards, enveloped in the liquid clay, and cold

almost beyond endurance. By persevering in her efforts, she at length

got her legs free, and so obtained partial relief. A silence of some

hours followed. When the dark hours of that terrible night had passed

and morning came, she had the satisfaction of knowing that the child

was not dead, but had fallen asleep. As soon as she awoke, she began

to cry and complain. The church bell now went again for prayers; and

Frances heard also the voice of her master making lamentations over his

loss. He had succeeded in escaping and rescuing the two children he had

with him, though one was for a time partly buried in the fringe of the

landslip. Seeking for the other members of his family, he had found the

lifeless body of his wife with the child she had taken in her arms, at

a distance of more than a quarter of a mile from where his house had

stood. All of her that was visible was one of her feet. While digging

out her body, he heard the cries of little Marianne. The child was at

once disinterred from her living grave; and though one of her legs was

broken, she seemed more anxious for the release of Frances than for

her own comfort. The maid was soon extricated; but she was bruised and

wounded in a frightful manner. For a long time her recovery was very

doubtful. Even after she was out of danger, she was unable to bear

the light, and was for a lengthened period subject to convulsions and

seasons of extreme fear and terror.

A traveller who visited the district about a week after the catastrophe

has given an interesting description of his visit: ‘Picture to yourself

a rude and mingled mass of earth and stone, bristling with the

shattered remains of wooden cottages, and with thousands of heavy trees

torn up by their roots and projecting in all directions. In one part

you might see a range of peasants’ huts, which the torrent of earth

had reached with just force enough to overthrow and break in pieces,

but without bringing soil enough to cover them. In another were mills

broken in pieces by huge rocks, separated from the top of the mountain,

which were even carried high up the Righi on the opposite side. Large

pools of water were formed in different places; and many little

streams, whose usual channels had been filled up, were bursting out in

various places.’

THE WHITEBOYS OF SIXTY YEARS AGO.

There is living in our neighbourhood an old man, the son of a once

famous ‘Whiteboy.’ As such, his bringing-up must have been strangely in

keeping with the moonlighting propensities of the present day, and of

which we unfortunately hear so much. But not so. ‘Barry,’ as we shall

call him, has a horror of Land-leagueism, and will have nothing to do

with it. His experience of the Whiteboys, or Moonlighters of sixty

years ago, is interesting—at least to me; and I hope the following

account will prove so to those who are not quite _au fait_ with the

doings of these confederations in Ireland sixty years ago.

Some time since, on the death of a relative, besides other effects

willed to me, was a box containing several _curios_. Amongst them was

a genuine letter written in 1823 by Captain Rock, in those days the

Moonlight leader of the Whiteboys. Knowing from Barry that his father

had been not only an admirer of Captain Rock, but a follower of his, I

showed him the letter, hoping that in doing so I would also verify its

authenticity. It was as follows:

¹ PEREVIL OF THE PEAK. ¹

_Notis._

Notis to Mistres H—— And all Whoe it May consarn that Whin Capton

Rock and His Adicongs visot you next you Will take Kare to Have

plenti of Mate and Pratees not Forgeting a Smol drop of the

Crater.[1]

Sind—J. ROCK. R.T.L.

_given at our counsil this |

10th day of April 1823._ |

----------------------------+

‘Sure, and that’s a real letter, and no mistake,’ said Barry, handing

it back to me after perusal. ‘I remember when I was a gorsoon [boy],

my father writing letters just like it, when he and the Boys would

meet of nights at our house. Many is the queer thing I heard them

plan, when they thought I was asleep in bed; and though I forgets

most of their doings now, I remembers a few; and I’ll tell them same

to you and welcome, if you likes to hear them. The Whiteboys, and the

Bloodsuckers, and the Molly M‘Guires resembles the Moonlighters of the

present day; though they were not, so to say, as bad entirely, still

they were fidgety creatures enough. ’Tis nigh on sixty years since my

father died, and I was a tidy bit of a lad then. He was a follower of

Captin Rock, the leader of what we called one kind of Whiteboys, in

those days. Captin Rock was, you know, only an imaginary name, just as

Captin Moonlight is in these times. I would not say as the Whiteboys

in my father’s time was as bad as those as followed them. _They_ said

nothing against paying the rent; and a good drop of the _crater_ would

do wonders with Captin Rock and his followers. Sure, ’twas hard in name

he was, as my father used to say, and not in nature.

‘The Bloodsuckers, who came next, were frightful creatures. They were

so called because they took money to inform. ’Twas the price of blood,

you see.

‘The famine of 1845 had a demoralising effect on the people, and many

and many the poor creature breaking stones on the roadside had a

pistol or some weapon of defence hid in the heap beside them. There

was one gentleman you would like to hear about, maybe, who met with

great troubles at the hands of the Boys. I knew him well, for many a

pocketful of apples he gave me; and he was as hard-working and honest a

creature as you’d meet with in a day’s walk. The Boys had no ill-will

against himself personally; but they thought to frighten him from

taking a farm as was “useful to them,”’ said Barry, with a knowing

wink. ‘The first thing they did was to send him a threatening letter.

Then a man as I knew full well—for many’s the time he and my poor

father laid their plans together—he was turned off to shoot him. He

stood inside the road-wall where there was an old archway half built

up—a mighty convenient place, as he afterwards said, to rest a gun on.

But for all that, he didn’t fire the shot that night, for reasons which

you’ll hear presently. The Boys were so disappointed, that two of them

went at dusk one evening to the gentleman’s own hall door and knocked.

Sure enough, just as they thought, he opened it himself for them. On

doing so, he saw the two Boys, one with a pistol, the other with a

blunderbuss.

“Come out; you are wanted,” says they to him.

“Yes,” replied he; “but wait till I get my hat.”

“Don’t mind your hat,” was the answer; “you’ll do for us without it.”

‘Just then the Missis came into the hall, and hearing the noise, off

they went.

‘Weeks afterwards, these men told the Master (as I shall call him,

seeing I never likes to mention names) that had he gone in for his hat

as he wanted to, they’d have shot him dead just where he stood, for

they would have been afraid he was going for help.

“Why didn’t you shoot me the night you were behind the old archway on

the old Moiveen road?” he asked one of them.

“The night was cold,” replied the Boy; “and the drop of the _crater_ as

the Captin sint me was that strong that it set me to sleep. I axes your

pardon now for going to shoot you at all, for you are such a ‘dacent’

[plucky] man, you might be one of the Boys yourself. And to show you I

has no ill-will agin you, if there is any little job as you wants done

before marning” (meaning murder, of course), “I’ll do it for you meself

and welcome.”

‘However, this didn’t see the poor Master at the end of his troubles;

there was more before him. A short time after, as the man was ploughing

in the field, four of the Boys came and told him to stand aside. Then

two of them held him, while the other two put a bullet through the head

of each horse, and the poor creatures died the same night. The Boys

broke the plough afterwards and warned the man away. They tied notices

on it forbidding any one to plough for the Master till he gave up the

idea of taking the farm, as Captin Rock wanted it for his own use.

‘But the Master, he was an iligant man surely. Many’s the time, gorsoon

though I was, I’d have given my two eyes to help him; but though I

was no Whiteboy, and I hated their dirty work, I was the son of one,

and you know, “There is honour among thieves.”—Well, as I was saying,

the Master was an iligant, foine man. Being a bit handy, he mended

his plough, took it in his own hands, and with his loaded gun laid

across it, did all the ploughing himself. Maybe you won’t hardly credit

me when I tell you that he did most of the work with a mule; and

sometimes, to help the poor baste, when the ground was light, he yoked

himself with her, whilst an old man who lived with the Master guided

the plough. After this, the Boys, seeing they could not frighten him,

let him alone.

‘When the Bloodsuckers had had their day, next came the Molly M‘Guires.

’Twas them as had the big blunderbuss called “Roaring Mag,” which

maybe you have heard tell of. There was an Englishman who came over

to Ireland and laid down a weir to catch our salmon; but the Molly

M‘Guires would not have any foreigners come a-fishing to our shores, so

they cut away the nets and destroyed the weir. Whenever they performed

a bould feat such as this, they made poetry of it, writing it out, and

giving a copy to the principal Molly M‘Guire Boys. ’Tis many a year ago

since four of the Boys, long since dead, wrote the piece I allude to;

and I doubt if there is any one alive but meself who could repeat it

for you; but I always had a good mimory,’ concluded Barry proudly.

MOLLY M‘GUIRE.

WRITTEN AND COMPOSED FOR THE

BOYS, BY FOUR OF ’EM.

_approved of |

by our counsil_ |

----------------+

Sind—MOLLY M‘GUIRE.

’Twas of a Sunday morning,

All by the break of day,

When Molly M‘Guire and her army

Came sailing down the say.

She heard ‘Tom Spratt’s’ got down a weir

The salmon to insnare.

But soon she did them liberate,

Once more to sport and play.

When Molly M‘Guire came into the weir,

The salmon to her did say:

‘If you don’t us liberate,

We’ll surely die this day.’

But Molly bein’ a commander bold,

She soon did give them orders

The salmon to liberate.

Pat Munster the spy

He scampered the police to bring down,

Sayin’, there is an armed party

Come sailin’ to this town

With their guns and bagnots screwed and fixed,

Besides the ‘Roaring Mag;’[2]

For they surely will cut down the weir;

They seem to be all mad.

The sargint cries: ‘Come on, me boys;

We’ll fire at them some shots.’

But Molly M‘Guire made them soon retire,

Her army stood so brave.

She chases the poliss to their dens,

Like dogs that lost their tails;

For Molly M‘Guire will rise the hire,

An’ cut away the weirs.

‘That’s a fine piece of poetry, isn’t it?’ asked Barry, as he concluded

this extraordinary medley, which cannot, I fear, be dignified by the

name of rhyme, much less poetry. ‘A grain of powder and shot and a

glass or two of the _crater_ would make a Molly M‘Guire your friend

for life, maybe. Sure, and many’s the curious thing I’ve known, and

many’s the plan made in my hearing by the Boys and my father; but

I would never tell on them, though I never had ought to do with

their intrigues, as I calls them. But though my poor father was a

real Whiteboy, he never had, as I knows of, the dark deeds on his

conscience that some of them Moonlighters of the present days has.

These is no times to be talking, leastways I keeps my thoughts to

meself; but as you seemed anxious-like to hear of them that went before

the Moonlighters, I am glad to oblige you. I have been able to do that

without mentioning names; and there isn’t many alive who could tell you

as well as meself of the doings in Old Oireland of sixty years ago.’

FOOTNOTES:

[1] Irish poteen whisky.

[2] The big blunderbuss taken in Clare.

CONCISE AND TO THE POINT.

Spartan brevity of speech is still sometimes amusingly illustrated. A

most worthy man, unaccustomed to public speaking, being suddenly called

upon to address a Sunday school, rose to his feet, and, after vainly

struggling for utterance, at last hoarsely muttered: ‘Dear children,

don’t ever play with powder.’—The following gallant toast was lately

given at a military dinner in Carolina: ‘The ladies—our arms their

protection—their arms our reward.’

‘Don’t eat stale Q-cumbers. They will W up,’ is the terse advice of

some wit.—Announcements on shop-signs expressed in the succinct style

of one connected with a certain restaurant in New York, should serve

as startling advertisements: ‘Lunch, 75 cents; square meal, 1 dollar;

perfect gorge, 1 dollar 25 cents.’—In the same city, a shopkeeper

is said to have stuck upon his door this laconic advertisement: ‘A

boy wanted.’ On going to his shop next morning, he beheld a smiling

little urchin in a basket, with the following pithy label: ‘Here he

is!’—A penny-a-liner would hardly find much employment on the Kansas

paper which informed the public that ‘Mr Blank of Missouri got to

owning horses that didn’t belong to him, and the next thing he knew

he couldn’t get his feet down to the ground.’ Lynched, probably.—A

Western writer, speaking of a new play just written by a gentleman of

Cincinnati, says: ‘The unities are admirably observed; the dullness

which commences with the first act, never flags for a moment until the

curtain falls.’

The characteristics of several nations have been summed up in the

following concise form: The first thing a Spaniard does on founding

a colony is to build a gallows; a Portuguese, to build a church; an

Englishman, a drinking-booth; and a Frenchman, a dancing-floor.

A cobbler visited one of the large manufactories the other day, and

for the first time in his life saw shoes made by machinery. ‘What do

you think of that?’ asked the foreman.—‘It beats awl,’ was the laconic

and significant reply.—A ‘sensible’ woman, as Dr Abernethy would have

called her, was discovered by a shy man, who made her a rather original

proposal. He bought a wedding ring, and sent it to the lady, inclosing

a sheet of notepaper with the brief question, ‘Does it fit?’ By return

of post he received for answer: ‘Beautifully.’

It is related that Makart, the great Viennese painter, is even more

taciturn than Von Moltke, the man who is silent in seven languages.

An American, who had been told that the best way to get on friendly

terms with the artist would be to play chess with him at the café to

which he resorted nightly, watched his opportunity, and, when Makart’s

opponent rose, slipped into his chair. At last his dream was about

to be realised, he was to spend an evening in Makart’s society. The

painter signed to him to play, and the game began, and went on with no

other sound than the moving of the pieces. At last the American made

the winning move, and exclaimed, ‘Mate!’ Up rose Makart in disgust and

stalked out, saying angrily to a friend who asked why he left so early:

‘Oh, I can’t stand playing with a chatterbox!’

The expressions used by some boys and girls if written as pronounced

would look like a foreign language. Specimens of boys’ conversation

like the following may be called shorthand talking: ‘Warejego

lasnight?’ ‘Hadder skate.’—‘Jerfind the ice hard’ngood?’ ‘Yes;

hard’nough.’—‘Jer goerlone? ‘No; Bill’n Joe wenterlong.’—‘Howlate

jerstay?’ ‘Pastate.’—‘Lemmeknow wenyergoin, woneher? I wanter

go’nshowyer howto skate.’—‘H—m, ficoodn’ skate better’n you I’d sell

out ’nquit.’ ‘Well, we’ll tryerace ’nseefyercan.’

The well-known answer of the Greeks to the Persian king before the

battle of Thermopylæ, was rivalled by the despatch of General Suvaroff

to the Russian Empress: ‘Hurrah! Ismail’s ours!’ The Empress returned

an answer equally brief: ‘Hurrah! Field-Marshal!’

The message from Lord Charles Beresford to his wife from the fort near

Metemmeh was pithy enough: ‘Quite well and cheerful. Privations have

been severe; thirst, hunger, battles desperate; but things look better.’

There are some quaint and pithy epistles on record. Quin, when offended

by Rich, went away in resentment and wrote: ‘I am at Bath.’ The answer

was as laconic, though not quite so civil: ‘Stay there.’

Sibbald, the editor of the _Chronicles of Scottish Poetry_, resided

in London for three or four years, during which time his friends in

Scotland were ignorant not only of his movements, but even of his

address. In the longrun, his brother, a Leith merchant, contrived to

get a letter conveyed to him, the object of which was to inquire into

his circumstances and to ask where he lived. His reply ran as follows:

‘DEAR BROTHER—I live in So-ho, and my business is so-so.—Yours, JAMES

SIBBALD.’

Concise and to the point was the curious letter sent by a farmer

to a schoolmaster as an excuse for his son’s absence from school:

‘Cepatomtogoatatrin.’ This meant, kep’ at ’ome to go a-taterin’

(gathering potatoes). A Canadian freshman once wrote home to his

father: ‘DEAR PAPA—I want a little change.’ The fond parent replied by

the next post: ‘DEAR CHARLIE—Just wait for it. Time brings change to

every one.’

Briefer than these was an epistle of Emile de Girardin to his second

wife, with whom he lived on most unfriendly terms. The house was large

enough to permit them to dwell entirely separate from one another. One

day, Madame de Girardin had an important communication to make to her

husband. Taking a small sheet of paper she wrote: ‘The Boudoir to the

Library: Would like to go to Switzerland.’—M. de Girardin, imitating

her concise style, responded: ‘The Library to the Boudoir: Go.’ That

was all.

One of the most laconic wills on record ran thus: ‘I have nothing; I

owe a great deal—the rest I give to the poor.’—A similar terse epitaph

to the following would have suited that will-maker: ‘Died of thin

shoes, January 1839.’

PARTED.

Once more my hand will clasp your hand;

Your loved voice I shall hear once more;

But we shall never see the land,

The pleasant land we knew of yore;

Never, on any summer day,

Hear the low music of its streams,

Or wander down the leafy way

That leadeth to the land of dreams.

Still, borne upon the scented air,

The songs of birds rise clear and sweet,

As when I gathered roses there,

And heaped their glories at your feet;

And still the golden pathway lies

At eve across the western sea,

And lovers dream beneath those skies,

Which shine no more for you and me.

No more, ah, nevermore! and yet

They seem so near, those summer days,

When Hope was like a jewel set

To shine adown Time’s misty ways;

I sometimes dream that morning’s light

Will bring them back to us once more,

And that ’tis but one long dark night

Since we two parted by the shore.

We parted with soft words and low,

And ‘Farewell till to-morrow,’ said;

From sea and sky, the sunset’s glow

A golden halo round you shed;

Then as you went, I heard you sing,

‘Haste thee, sweet morrow:’ parting thus,

How could we dream that life would bring

Not any morrow there for us?

We parted, and that last farewell

Its shadow on our life-path cast;

And Time’s relentless barriers fell

Between us and our happy past;

And now we meet when cares and tears

Have dulled the parting and the pain,

But never can the weary years

Bring back our golden dreams again.

D. J. ROBERTSON.

* * * * *

Printed and Published by W. & R. CHAMBERS, 47 Paternoster Row, LONDON,

and 339 High Street, EDINBURGH.

* * * * *

_All Rights Reserved._

* * * * *

[Transcriber’s note—the following changes have been made to this text.

Page 627: Luée to Lucé—“earth at Lucé”.]

Chambers's journal of popular literature, science, and art, fifth series, no. 144, vol. III, October 2, 1886 · 第 3 / 3 段