THE ORDER OF RHYTHM IN LINES

76. The eye, not being held on a vertical axis or on a balance-center,

readily follows any suggestion of movement.

[Illustration: Fig. 97]

In this case there is no intimation of any vertical axis or

balance-center. The figure is consequently unstable. There is a sense

of movement to the right. This is due, not only to the inclinations to

the right, but to the convergences in that direction.

[Illustration: Fig. 98]

In this case the movement is unmistakably to the left. In such cases we

have movement, but no Rhythm.

77. Rhythm requires, not only movement, but the order of regular and

marked intervals.

[Illustration: Fig. 99]

In Fig. 99 we have a line, a linear progression, which gives us the

feeling of movement, unmistakably. The movement, which in the motive

itself is not rhythmical, becomes rhythmical in its repetition at

regular, and in this case equal, intervals. The intervals are marked by

the repetitions.

78. It is a question of some interest to decide how many repetitions

are required in a Rhythm. In answer to this question I should say

three as a rule. A single repetition shows us only one interval, and

we do not know whether the succeeding intervals are to be equal or

progressive, arithmetically progressive or geometrically progressive.

The rhythm is not defined until this question is decided, as it will

be by two more repetitions. The measures of the rhythm might take the

form of a repeated relation of measures; a repetition, for example, of

the measures two, seven, four. In that case the relation of the three

measures would have to be repeated at least three times before the

character of the rhythm could be appreciated.

79. Any contrariety of movement in the motive is extended, of course,

to its repetitions.

[Illustration: Fig. 100]

In this case, for example, there are convergences and, consequently,

movements both up and down. This contrariety of movements is felt

through the whole series of repetitions. Other things being equal, I

believe the eye moves up more readily than down, so that convergences

downward have less effect upon us than corresponding convergences

upward.

[Illustration: Fig. 101]

In this case, by omitting the long vertical line I have diminished the

amount of convergence downward. In that way I have given predominance

to the upward movement. Instead of altogether omitting the long

vertical line, I might have changed its tone from black to gray. That

would cause an approximate instead of complete disappearance. It should

be remembered that in all these cases the habit of reading comes in to

facilitate the movements to the right. It is easier for the eye to move

to the right than in any other direction, other things being equal.

The movement back to the beginning of another line, which is of course

inevitable in reading, produces comparatively little impression upon

us, no more than the turning of the page. The habit of reading to the

right happens to be our habit. The habit is not universal.

80. Reading repetitions and alternations to the right, always, I, for

a long time, regarded such repetitions and alternations as rhythmical,

until Professor Mowll raised the question whether it is necessary

to read all alternations to the right when there is nothing in the

alternations themselves to suggest a movement in one direction rather

than another. Why not read them to the left as well as to the right?

We at once decided that the movement in a Rhythm must be determined

by the character of the Rhythm itself, not by any habit of reading,

or any other habit, on our part. It was in that way that we came

to regard repetitions and alternations as illustrations of Harmony

rather than of Rhythm. Rhythm comes into the Harmony of a Repeated

Relation when the relation is one which causes the eye to move in one

direction rather than another, and when the movement is carried on from

repetition to repetition, from measure to measure.

81. The repetition of a motive at equal intervals, when there is no

movement in the motive, gives us no feeling of Rhythm.

[Illustration: Fig. 102]

In this case, for example, we have a repetition in the line of a

certain symmetrical shape. As there is no movement in the shape

repeated, there is no Rhythm in the repetition. There is nothing to

draw the eye in one direction rather than another. The attractions at

one end of the line correspond with the attractions at the other.

82. The feeling of Rhythm may be induced by a regular diminution of

measure or scale in the repetitions of the motive and in the intervals

in which the repetitions take place.

[Illustration: Fig. 103]

In this case the shape repeated is still symmetrical, but it is

repeated with a gradual diminution of scale and of intervals, by which

we are given a feeling of rhythmic movement. The change of scale and of

intervals, to induce a sense of rhythmic motion, must be regular. To

be regular the change must be in the terms of one or the other of the

regular progressions; the arithmetical progression, which proceeds by

a certain addition, or the geometrical, which proceeds by a certain

multiplication. The question may arise in this case (Fig. 103) whether

the movement of the Rhythm is to the right or to the left. I feel,

myself, that the movement is to the right. In diminishing the scale of

the motive and of the intervals we have, hardly at all, diminished the

extent of the tone-contrast in a given angle of vision. See Fig. 41,

p. 27, showing the increase of attractions from one visual angle to

another. At the same time we come at the right end of the progression

to two or more repetitions in the space of one. We have, therefore,

established the attraction of a crowding together at the right end

of the series. See the passage (p. 43) on the attractiveness of a

line. The force of the crowding together of attractions is, I feel,

sufficient to cause a movement to the right. It must be remembered,

however, that the greater facility of reading to the right is added

here to the pull of a greater crowding together of attractions in the

same direction, so the movement of the Rhythm in that direction may not

be very strong after all. If the direction of any Rhythm is doubtful,

the Rhythm itself is doubtful.

83. The feeling of Rhythm may be induced, as I have said, by a gradual

increase of the number of attractions from measure to measure, an

increase of the extent of tone-contrast.

[Illustration: Fig. 104]

Increasing the extent of tone-contrast and the number of attractions in

the measures of the Rhythm in Fig. 103, we are able to force the eye to

follow the series in the direction contrary to the habit of reading,

that is to say from right to left.

A decrease in the forces of attraction in connection with a decrease

of scale is familiar to us all in the phenomena of perspective. The

gradual disappearance of objects in aerial perspective does away

with the attraction of a greater crowding together of objects in the

distance.

[Illustration: Fig. 105]

In this case the diminution of scale has been given up and there is

no longer any crowding together. There is no chance of this rhythm

being read from left to right except by an effort of the will. The

increase of attractions toward the left is much more than sufficient to

counteract the habit of reading.

84. The force of a gradual coming together of attractions, inducing

movement in the direction of such coming together, is noticeable in

spiral shapes.

[Illustration: Fig. 106]

In this case we have a series of straight lines with a constant and

equal change of direction to the right, combined with a regular

diminution of measures in the length of the lines, this in the terms

of an arithmetical progression. The movement is in the direction of

concentration and it is distinctly marked in its measures. The movement

is therefore rhythmical.

[Illustration: Fig. 107]

In this case we have a series of straight lines with a constant change

of direction to the right; but in this case the changes of measure in

the lines are in the terms of a geometrical progression. The direction

is the same, the pull of concentration perhaps stronger.

[Illustration: Fig. 108]

In this Rhythm there is an arithmetical gradation of measures

in the changes of direction, both in the length of the legs and

in the measure of the angles. The pull of concentration is, in

this case, very much increased. It is evident that the legs may

vary arithmetically and the angles geometrically; or the angles

arithmetically and the legs geometrically.

85. If, in the place of the straight lines, which form the legs, in

any of the examples given, are substituted lines which in themselves

induce movement, the feeling of Rhythm may be still further increased,

provided the directions of movement are consistent.

[Illustration: Fig. 109]

In this case the movement is in the direction of increasing

concentration and in the direction of the convergences.

If the movement of the convergences be contrary to the movement of

concentration, there will be in the figure a contrary motion which

may diminish or even entirely prevent the feeling of Rhythm. If the

movement in one direction or the other predominates, we may still

get the feeling of Rhythm, in spite of the drawback of the other and

contrary movement.

[Illustration: Fig. 110]

In this case the linear convergences substituted for the straight lines

are contrary to the direction of increasing concentration. The movement

is doubtful.

86. Corresponding rhythms, set in contrary motion, give us the feeling

of Balance rather than of Rhythm. The balance in such cases is a

balance of movements.

[Illustration: Fig. 111]

This is an example of corresponding and opposed rhythms producing the

feeling, not of Rhythm, but of Balance.

A theory of pure design · 第 51 / 156 题