The original Constitution of New York is more positive:--

“The chancellor and judges of the Supreme Court shall not

at the same time hold _any other office_, excepting that of

Delegate to the General Congress upon special occasions; and

the first judges of the county courts in the several counties

shall not at the same time hold any other _office_, excepting

that of _Senator_ or Delegate to the General Congress.”[300]

Here the post of Delegate to the General Congress, and also of

“Senator,” is treated as an “office.”

Surely this is enough. The post of Senator is an office of honor or

profit, and a “Senator” is an “officer.”

* * * * *

2. But, assuming that the post of Senator is an “office,” and that a

Senator is an “officer,” the question occurs, To what “department of

the public service” does he belong?

Clearly he is not of the “military” or “naval” department. But if not

“military” or “naval,” he must be “civil.” Here again consult the

dictionary. I cite Webster.

“_Civil._ It is distinguished from _ecclesiastical_, which

respects the Church, and from _military_, which respects the

army and navy.--This term is often employed in contrast with

_military_: as, a _civil_ hospital, the _civil_ service, &c.”

“_Civil List._ In England, formerly, a list of the entire

expenses of the _civil_ government; hence the officers of

_civil_ government, who are paid from the public treasury;

also, the revenue appropriated to support the _civil_

government.”

“_Civil State._ The whole body of the laity or citizens, not

included under the military, maritime, and ecclesiastical

states.”

To say that a Senator is not included under this comprehensive, but

distinctive term, is simply an absurdity.

It is evident that Congress adopted the words of the statute because

they were comprehensive and distinctive. They obviously comprehended

all “officers” in the “public service,” whether “elected,” like a

Senator, or “appointed,” like a judge. But, beyond their plainness,

these words had this added advantage, that already for more than a

generation they had received a practical interpretation from Congress.

Charles Sumner: his complete works, volume 10 (of 20) · 第 69 / 99 题