MARCUS. _Necesse est igitur legem haberi in rebus optimis._

QUINTUS. Prorsus assentior.

CICERO, _De Legibus_, Lib. II. cap. 5.

* * * * *

I have told,

O Britons! O my brethren! I have told

Most bitter truth, but without bitterness.

Nor deem my zeal or factious or mistimed;

For never can true courage dwell with them

Who, playing tricks with conscience, dare not look

At their own vices.

COLERIDGE, _Sibylline Leaves: Fears in Solitude_.

* * * * *

’Tis therefore sober and good men are sad

For England’s glory, seeing it wax pale

And sickly.

COWPER, _The Task_, Book V. 509-511.

* * * * *

The Government condemns in the highest degree the conduct of

any of our citizens who may personally engage in committing

hostilities at sea against any of the nations parties to the

present war, and will exert all the means with which the laws

and Constitution have armed them to discover such as offend

herein and bring them to condign punishment.… The practice of

commissioning, equipping, and manning vessels in our ports

to cruise on any of the belligerent parties is equally and

entirely disapproved; and the Government will take effectual

measures to prevent a repetition of it.--JEFFERSON, _Letter to

Mr. Hammond, May 15, 1793_: Writings, Vol. III. p. 559.

* * * * *

One spot remains which oceans cannot wash out. The slavery of

the African race, which the North Americans had inherited from

the ancient monarchy, was adopted and fondly cherished by the

new Republic.… The logic of the Constitution declared that

all men were free: the pride and avarice of the slave-owners,

disowning the image of the Creator and the brotherhood of

nature, degraded men of a dark color, and even all the

descendants of their sons and daughters, to a level with oxen

and horses. But as oxen and horses never combine, and have

no sense of wronged independence, oxen and horses are better

treated than the men and women of African blood.… But neither

the philosophical dogma of the authors of the Constitution,

nor the strict pedantry of law, can stifle the cry of outraged

humanity, nor still the current of human sympathy, nor arrest

forever the decrees of Eternal Justice.--LORD JOHN RUSSELL,

_Life and Times of Charles James Fox_, Vol. I. pp. 364, 365.

* * * * *

To this condition the Constitution of this Confederacy reduces

the whole African race; and while declaring these to be its

principles, the founders claim the privilege of being admitted

into the society of the nations of the earth,--principles

worthy only of being conceived and promulgated by the

inmates of the infernal regions, and a fit constitution for

a confederacy in Pandemonium. _Now, as soon as the nature

of this Constitution is truly explained and understood, is

it possible that the nations of the earth can admit such a

Confederacy into their society? Can any nation calling itself

civilized associate, with any sense of self-respect, with

a nation avowing and practising such principles?_ Will not

every civilized nation, when the nature of this Confederacy is

understood, come to the side of the United States, and refuse

all association with them, as, in truth, they are, _hostes

humani generis_? For the African is as much entitled to be

protected in the rights of humanity as any other portion of

the human race. _As to Great Britain, her course is, in the

nature of things, already fixed and immutable. She must sooner

or later join the United States in this war, or be disgraced

throughout all future time_; for the principle of that

civilization which this Confederacy repudiates was by her--to

her great glory, and with unparalleled sacrifices--introduced

into the code of Civilization, and she will prove herself

recreant, if she fails to maintain it.--JOSIAH QUINCY, _Address

before the Union Club of Boston, February 27, 1863_.

* * * * *

If British merchants look with eagerness to the event of the

struggle in South America, no doubt they do so with the hope of

deriving advantage from that event. But on what is such hope

founded? On the diffusion of beggary, on the maintenance of

ignorance, on the confirmation of slavery, on the establishment

of tyranny in America? No; these are the expectations of

Ferdinand. The British merchant builds his hopes of trade and

profit on the progress of civilization and good government, on

the successful assertion of Freedom,--of Freedom, that parent

of talent, that parent of heroism, that parent of every virtue.

The fate of South America can only be accessory to commerce as

it becomes accessory to the dignity and the happiness of the

race of man.--SIR JAMES MACKINTOSH, _Speech in Parliament, on

the Foreign Enlistment Bill, June 10, 1819_.

* * * * *

When a power comparable only to Thugs, buccaneers, and

cannibals tries to thrust its hideous head among nations, and

claims the protection and privileges of International Law,--a

power which rose against the freest rule on earth for the

avowed motive of propagating the worst form of Slavery ever

known, having no legitimate complaint, or, if it had, certainly

trying no constitutional means of redress, but plunging at once

into arms, and that when the arsenals had been emptied and the

fortresses seized by the treason of office-holders,--I hold it

to be an offence against law, order, and public morality for a

statesman whose words carry weight to speak at all of such a

power without declaring abhorrence of it.--PROFESSOR FRANCIS W.

NEWMAN, _Letter to Mr. Gladstone, December 1, 1862_.

* * * * *

I blame men who are eager to admit into the Family of Nations a

state which offers itself to us, based upon a principle, I will

undertake to say, more odious and more blasphemous than was

ever heretofore dreamed of in Christian or Pagan, in civilized

or in savage times. The leaders of this revolt propose this

monstrous thing: that over a territory forty times as large

as England the blight and curse of Slavery shall be forever

perpetuated.--JOHN BRIGHT, _Speech at Birmingham, December 18,

1862_.

* * * * *

We are already culpable for a part of this bloody war; for,

better informed or less indifferent, less selfish or more

adroit, above all, more wise, more sincerely the friends

of what is right, we could, from London and Paris, have

thrown into the midst of the combatants this declaration,

which would have rendered the conflict ephemeral: “Never

will either England or France, Christian nations, liberal

nations, recognize the existence of a people seeking to found

Liberty and Independence on Slavery!” The misfortune of the

times, in obscuring our judgment, in dulling our passion for

the beautiful ideas of Freedom, has, then, already made us

participants, in some respect, in the rebellion of the people

of the South, and, in order to mask what was gross and low in

our voluntary error, we set up vague reasons of commercial

policy and general policy at which our fathers would have

blushed.… The truth is, that the revolt of the South is the

most impudent and most odious insult that has ever been offered

to the ideas of modern Civilization.--JOURNAL DES ÉCONOMISTES,

Avril, 1864, Tom. XLII. p. 88.

The following speech[1] was delivered at the invitation of the

New York Young Men’s Republican Union, at Cooper Institute,

on the 10th of September, 1863. The announcement that Mr.

Sumner had consented to address the citizens of New York on

a subject so momentous attracted an audience numbering not

less than three thousand persons, among whom were most of the

acknowledged representatives of the intelligence, wealth, and

influence of the metropolis. Long before the hour appointed for

the delivery of the speech, the entrance-doors were besieged by

an impatient and anxious crowd, who, as soon as the gates were

opened, filled the seats, aisles, lobbies, and platform of the

vast hall, leaving at least an equal number to return home,

unable to gain an entrance to the building.

Of the following named gentlemen, who were invited to occupy

seats upon the platform, a majority were present, while in

the auditorium were hundreds of equally prominent citizens,

who preferred to retain seats near the ladies whom they had

escorted to the meeting.

Francis Lieber, LL.D., George Bancroft, Major-General Dix,

Horace Greeley, George Griswold, John E. Williams, W. W.

DeForest, Cornelius Vanderbilt, Abram Wakeman, Rev. Dr. Tyng,

Cyrus W. Field, Alexander T. Stewart, Horace Webster, LL.D.,

Joseph Lawrence, John A. Stevens, Pelatiah Perit, James A.

Hamilton, H. B. Claflin, T. L. Thornell, Colonel William

Borden, William Goodell, Rev. Dr. Thompson, Rev. Dr. Gillette,

William Cullen Bryant, Major-General Fremont, A. A. Low,

John Jay, Henry Grinnell, James Gallatin, Cephas Brainerd,

William B. Astor, William H. Aspinwall, Oliver Johnson, W. M.

Evarts, William Curtis Noyes, Rev. Dr. Hitchcock, Shepherd

Knapp, William H. Webb, James W. Gerard, Anson Livingston,

Frank W. Ballard, Isaac H. Bailey, George B. Lincoln, General

Harvey Brown, Rev. Dr. Shedd, Rev. Dr. Durbin, Peter Cooper,

Major-General Doubleday, Charles H. Marshall, Marshall O.

Roberts, Judge Bradford, Charles H. Russell, E. Delafield

Smith, Hamilton Fish, Robert B. Minturn, Rev. Dr. Cheever, F.

B. Cutting, Charles King, LL.D., Rev. Dr. Ferris, Ex-Governor

King, George Folsom, Samuel B. Ruggles, S. B. Chittenden,

Charles T. Rodgers, Mark Hoyt, Lewis Tappan, Rev. Dr. Storrs,

Rev. Dr. Adams, Rev. Dr. Vinton, Daniel Drew, Francis Hall,

George William Curtis, Judge Edmonds, Rev. Dr. Asa D. Smith,

Truman Smith, William A. Hall, Prosper M. Wetmore, B. F.

Manierre, George P. Putnam, E. C. Johnson, Rev. Dr. Osgood,

Elliott C. Cowdin, Rev. T. Ralston Smith, J. S. Schultz, M.

Armstrong, Jr., D. A. Hawkins, Edgar Ketchum, Joseph Hoxie,

Rev. Dr. Bellows, General S. C. Pomeroy, James McKaye, George

F. Butman, David Dudley Field.

David Dudley Field, Esq., who had been selected by the

Committee as Chairman of the meeting, introduced Mr. Sumner to

the audience in the following words.

“LADIES AND GENTLEMEN,--At no former period in the history

of the country has the condition of its foreign relations

been so important and so critical as it is at this moment.

In what agony of mortal struggle this nation has passed the

last two years we all know. A rebellion of unparalleled

extent, of indescribable enormity, without any justifiable

cause, without even a decent pretext, stimulated by the

bad passions which a barbarous institution had originated,

and encouraged by expected and promised aid from false men

among ourselves, has filled the land with desolation and

mourning. During this struggle it has been our misfortune

to encounter the evil disposition of the two nations of

Western Europe with which we are most closely associated

by ties of blood, common history, and mutual commerce.

Perhaps I ought to have said the evil disposition of the

governments, rather than of the nations; for in France the

people have no voice, and we know only the imperial will

and policy, while in England the masses have no powers, the

House of Commons being elected by a fraction of the people,

and the aristocratic classes being against us from dislike

to the freedom of our institutions, and the mercantile

classes from the most sordid motives of private gain. To

what extent this evil disposition has been carried, what

causes have stimulated it, in what acts it has manifested

itself, and what consequences may be expected to follow

from it in future, will be explained by the distinguished

orator who is to address you this evening. His position as

Chairman of the Senate Committee on Foreign Relations has

given him an acquaintance with the subject equal, if not

superior, to that of any other person in the country. He

needs no introduction from me. His name is an introduction

and a passport in any free community between the Atlantic

and the Pacific seas; therefore, without saying more, I

will give way for CHARLES SUMNER, of Massachusetts.”

Amid the most marked demonstrations of satisfaction, expressed

frequently by long-continued applause and hearty cheers, Mr.

Sumner proceeded in the delivery of his discourse. The meeting

adjourned about an hour before midnight.

Three New York newspapers and two in Boston printed the entire

speech on the day following its delivery.

Charles Sumner: his complete works, volume 10 (of 20) · 第 9 / 99 题