LETTER 502. TO MR. MOORE.

"Pisa, August 8. 1822.

"You will have heard by this time that Shelley and another

gentleman (Captain Williams) were drowned about a month ago (a

_month_ yesterday), in a squall off the Gulf of Spezia. There is

thus another man gone, about whom the world was ill-naturedly, and

ignorantly, and brutally mistaken. It will, perhaps, do him justice

_now_, when he can be no better for it.[83]

"I have not seen the thing you mention[84], and only heard of it

casually, nor have I any desire. The price is, as I saw in some

advertisements, fourteen shillings, which is too much to pay for a

libel on oneself. Some one said in a letter, that it was a Doctor

Watkins, who deals in the life and libel line. It must have

diminished your natural pleasure, as a friend (vide

Rochefoucault), to see yourself in it.

"With regard to the Blackwood fellows, I never published any thing

against them; nor, indeed, have seen their magazine (except in

Galignani's extracts) for these three years past. I once wrote, a

good while ago, some remarks [85] on their review of Don Juan, but

saying very little about themselves, and these were _not_

published. If you think that I ought to follow your example[86](and

I like to be in your company when I can) in contradicting their

impudence, you may shape this declaration of mine into a similar

paragraph for me. It is possible that you may have seen the little

I _did_ write (and never published) at Murray's;--it contained much

more about Southey than about the Blacks.

"If you think that I ought to do any thing about Watkins's book, I

should not care much about publishing _my Memoir now_, should it be

necessary to counteract the fellow. But, in _that_ case, I should

like to look over the _press_ myself. Let me know what you think,

or whether I had better _not_;--at least, not the second part,

which touches on the actual confines of still existing matters.

"I have written three more Cantos of Don Juan, and am hovering on

the brink of another (the ninth). The reason I want the stanzas

again which I sent you is, that as these cantos contain a full

detail (like the storm in Canto Second) of the siege and assault of

Ismael, with much of sarcasm on those butchers in large business,

your mercenary soldiery, it is a good opportunity of gracing the

poem with * * *. With these things and these fellows, it is

necessary, in the present clash of philosophy and tyranny, to throw

away the scabbard. I know it is against fearful odds; but the

battle must be fought; and it will be eventually for the good of

mankind, whatever it may be for the individual who risks himself.

"What do you think of your Irish bishop? Do you remember Swift's

line, 'Let me have a _barrack_--a fig for the _clergy_?' This seems

to have been his reverence's motto. * * *

"Yours," &c.

[Footnote 83: In a letter to Mr. Murray, of an earlier date, which has

been omitted to avoid repetitions, he says on the same subject, "You

were all mistaken about Shelley, who was, without exception, the _best_

and least selfish man I ever knew." There is also another passage in the

same letter which, for its perfect truth, I must quote:--"I have

received your scrap, with Henry Drury's letter enclosed. It is just like

him--always kind and ready to oblige his old friends."]

[Footnote 84: A book which had just appeared, entitled "Memoirs of the

Right Hon. Lord Byron."]

[Footnote 85: The remarkable pamphlet from which extracts have been

already given in this work.]

[Footnote 86: It had been asserted in a late Number of Blackwood, that

both Lord Byron and myself were employed in writing satires against that

Magazine.]

* * * * *

Life of Lord Byron, Vol. 5 With His Letters and Journals · 第 129 / 135 题