HENRY JAMES.

_To Howard Sturgis._

The proof-sheets in question were those of Mr. Sturgis's

forthcoming novel, _Belchamber_.

Lamb House, Rye.

November 8th, 1903.

My dear Howard,

I send you back the blooming proofs with my thanks and with no marks or

comments at all. In the first place there are none, of the marginal

kind, to make, and in the second place it is too late to make them if

there were. The thing goes on very solidly and smoothly, interesting and

amusing as it moves, very well written, well felt, well composed, well

written perhaps in particular. I am a bad person, really, to expose

"fictitious work" to--I, as a battered producer and "technician" myself,

have long since inevitably ceased to read with _naivete_; I can only

read critically, constructively, reconstructively, writing the thing

over (if I can swallow it at all) _my_ way, and looking at it, so to

speak, from within. But even thus I "pass" your book very--tenderly!

There is only one thing that, as a matter of detail, I am moved to

say--which is that I feel you have a great deal increased your

difficulty by screwing up the "social position" of all your people so

very high. When a man is an English Marquis, even a lame one, there are

whole masses of Marquisate things and items, a multitude of inherent

detail in his existence, which it isn't open to the painter _de gaiete

de coeur_ not to make some picture of. And yet if I mention this

because it is _the_ place where people will challenge you, and to

suggest to you therefore to expect it--if I do so I am probably after

all quite wrong. No one notices or understands _any_thing, and no one

will make a single intelligent or intelligible observation about your

work. They will make plenty of others. What I applaud is your sticking

to the real line and centre of your theme--the consciousness and view of

Sainty himself, and your dealing with things, with the whole

fantasmagoria, as presented to him only, not otherwise going behind

them.

And also I applaud, dearest Howard, your expression of attachment to him

who holds this pen (and passes it at this moment over very dirty paper:)

for he is extremely accessible to such demonstrations and touched by

them--more than ever in his lonely (more than) maturity. Keep it up as

hard as possible; continue to pass your hand into my arm and believe

that I always like greatly to feel it. We are two who can communicate

freely.

I send you back also Temple Bar, in which I have found your paper a

moving and charming thing, waking up the pathetic ghost only too

effectually. The ancient years and images that I too more or less

remember swarm up and vaguely moan round about one like Banshees or

other mystic and melancholy presences. It's _all_ a little mystic and

melancholy to me here when I am quite alone, as I more particularly am

after "grand" company has come and gone. You are essentially grand

company, and felt as such--and the subsidence is proportionally flat.

But I took a long walk with Max this grey still Sabbath afternoon--have

indeed taken one each day, and am possessed of means, thank goodness, to

make the desert (of being quite to myself) blossom like the rose.

Good-night--it's 12.30, the clock ticks loud and Max snoozes audibly in

the armchair I lately vacated.... Yours, my dear Howard always and ever,

The Letters of Henry James (Vol. I) · 第 134 / 145 题