HENRY JAMES.

_To Robert Louis Stevenson._

34 De Vere Gardens, W.

October 21st [1893.]

My dear Louis,

The postal guide tells me, disobligingly, that there is no mail to you

via San Francisco this month and that I must confide my few lines to

the precarious and perfidious Hamburg. I do so, then, for the plain

reason that I can no longer repress the enthusiasm that has surged

within me ever since I read _Catriona_. I missed, just after doing so,

last month's post, and I was infinitely vexed that it should not have

conveyed to you the freshness of my rapture. For the said _Catriona_ so

reeks and hums with genius that there is no refuge for the desperate

reader but in straightforward prostration. I'm not sure that it's

magnanimous of you to succeed so inconsiderately--there is a modesty in

easy triumph which your flushed muse perhaps a little neglects.--But

forgive that lumbering image--I won't attempt to carry it out. Let me

only say that I don't despatch these ineffectual words on their too

watery way to do anything but thank you for an exquisite pleasure. I

hold that when a book has the high beauty of that one there's a poor

indelicacy in what simple folk call criticism. The work lives by so

absolute a law that it's grotesque to prattle about what _might_ have

been! I shall express to you the one point in which my sense was

conscious of an unsatisfied desire, but only after saying first how rare

an achievement I think the whole personality and tone of David and with

how supremely happy a hand you have coloured the palpable women. They

are quite too lovely and everyone is running after them. In David not an

error, not a false note ever; he is all of an exasperating truth and

rightness. The one thing I miss in the book is the note of

_visibility_--it subjects my visual sense, my _seeing_ imagination, to

an almost painful underfeeding. The _hearing_ imagination, as it were,

is nourished like an alderman, and the loud audibility seems a slight

the more on the baffled lust of the eyes--so that I seem to myself (I am

speaking of course only from the point of view of the way, as I read,

_my_ impression longs to complete itself) in the presence of voices in

the darkness--voices the more distinct and vivid, the more brave and

sonorous, as voices always are--but also the more tormenting and

confounding--by reason of these bandaged eyes. I utter a pleading moan

when you, e.g., transport your characters, toward the end, in a line or

two from Leyden to Dunkirk without the glint of a hint of all the

ambient picture of the 18th century road. However, stick to your own

system of evocation so long as what you positively achieve is so big.

Life and letters and art all take joy in you.

I am rejoiced to hear that your wife is less disturbed in health and

that your anxieties are somewhat appeased. I don't know how sufficiently

to renew, to both of you, the assurance of all my friendliest sympathy.

You live in conditions so unimaginable and to the tune of experience so

great and so strange that you must forgive me if I am altogether out of

step with your events. I know you're surrounded with the din of battle,

and yet the beauty you produce has the Goethean calm, even like the

beauty distilled at Weimar when the smoke was over Jena. Let me touch

you at least on your bookish side and the others may bristle with

heroics. I pray you be made accessible some day in a talkative armchair

by the fire. If it hadn't been for _Catriona_ we couldn't, this year,

have held up our head. It had been long, before that, since any decent

sentence was turned in English. We grow systematically vulgarer and

baser. The only blur of light is that your books are tasted. I shall try

to see Colvin before I post this--otherwise I haven't seen him for three

months. I've had a summer of the British seaside, the bathing machine

and the German band. I met Zola at luncheon the day before he left

London and found him very sane and common and inexperienced. Nothing,

literally nothing, has ever happened to him but to write the

Rougon-Macquart. It makes that series, I admit, still more curious.

Your tour de force is of the opposite kind. Renew the miracle, my dear

Louis, and believe me yours already gaping,

The Letters of Henry James (Vol. I) · 第 56 / 145 题