[831] The chapter “Of the Pulpit” was first published in 1688, and

our author made additions to it until the eighth edition of the

“Characters” saw the light, in 1694. He had heard all the best

preachers of his time, such as the Jesuit Claude de Lingendes (See page

323, note 2), and the Oratorians Le Jeune and Senault, who both died in

1672, whilst Bossuet preached in Paris from 1659 to 1669. Bourdaloue

began preaching there in 1663, Mascaron in 1666, Fléchier in 1670, and

Fénelon in 1675. The only great pulpit-orator our author did not hear

was Massillon, who did not preach in the capital until 1696. Several

sermons on pulpit oratory were preached in France, and many books on

the same subject had been published there before and after this chapter

was printed.

[832] Three barristers of repute in the seventeenth century, Antoine

le Maître (1608-1658), whose _Recueil de Plaidoyers_ has been printed;

Claude Pucelle, and Bonaventure Fourcroy, a friend of Molière and

Boileau, who died in 1691 and was a poet as well as a lawyer.

[833] See the Chapter “Of Certain Customs,” § 42.

[834] A certain Abbé le Tourneur or le Tourneux, who died in 1680 at

the age of forty-six, is said to have been such a man, but was, of

course, not allowed to remain long at court.

[835] Bourdaloue (1632-1704) set the fashion of introducing in his

sermons “portraits” or “Characters” of well-known individuals: a

fashion which was much exaggerated by his imitators, and which also

for some time prevailed in England. The Sermons of Dr. R. South

(1633-1716), Prebendary of Westminster and Canon of Christ Church,

Oxon, contain also many “portraits.”

[836] Our author says in a note; “This was Father Seraphin, a Capuchin

monk.” Others have been less favourably inclined towards this preacher

than La Bruyère was. This monk, who had been holding forth in Paris as

early as 1671, preached in the parish church of Versailles, and four

years later before the court and the king, in the palace.

[837] Saint Basil (329-379) was bishop of Cesarea; Saint John

Chrysostom was (347-407) bishop of Constantinople, called the

“golden-mouthed” for his great eloquence.

[838] Our author makes the same observation about dramatic poets. See

his Chapter “Of Works of the Mind,” page 9, § 8.

[839] Compare in Racineʼs comedy of _Les Plaideurs_ the speech of

“LʼIntimé” (act iii, scene 3), to ridicule similar quotations.

[840] The Pandects of the Roman emperor Justinian were a cyclopædia of

legal decisions of Roman lawyers; and after they had been discovered

at Amalfi in Italy about the year 1137, they changed the whole of the

legal aspect of Europe.

[841] There were three saints of the name of Cyrillus, but the one

mentioned above was probably bishop of Jerusalem (315-388); Saint

Thascius Cæcilius Cyprianus (210-285) was bishop of Carthage: whilst

Saint Aurelius Augustinus (354-430) was the celebrated author and

bishop of Hippo.

[842] The preachers accused of a florid style were, according to the

“Keys,” the Oratorian Senault, and Fléchier, who in 1685 had been

appointed bishop of Nîmes.

[843] Theodorus is supposed to be Bourdaloue (see page 165, note 3).

Some other celebrated preachers have also been named.

[844] Charles Boileau, _abbé_ de Beaulieu, and a member of the French

Academy, who died in 1704 (see page 49, note 2), is said to have

preached a morality such as is mentioned in the above paragraph.

[845] A certain Abbé de Roquette, a nephew of the Bishop of Autun (see

page 226, note i.), had to preach one Holy Thursday before the king,

but through some unfortunate accident Louis XIV. could not be present,

and the preacher, disconcerted at the absence of the monarch, for whom

probably he had prepared the most fulsome flatteries, did not dare to

mount the pulpit and deliver his sermon.

[846] In the original _clercs_, to which our author added a note

in the first four editions to say that he meant “clergymen.” The

whole paragraph alludes to the missionaries sent into the provinces

to convert the Protestants. Did La Bruyère, in speaking of the

“converts who had already been made for these clergymen,” hint at the

_dragonnades_ and at the other wretched and inhuman means employed to

compel people to change their religion? I am afraid not, though he

admits some persons could not be converted.

[847] Saint Vincent de Paul (1566-1660), a well-known philanthropical

preacher, very successful in his missions; Saint Francis Xavier

(1506-1553), a Jesuit missionary, who made many converts in the East

Indies.

[848] See page 173, note 1.

[849] See the chapter “Of Works of the Mind,” page 8, § 3.

[850] Some scribbler of the time, a certain Gédéon Pontier, author

of the _Cabinet des Grands_, is said to have written almost similar

nonsense.

[851] In 1689, the same year this paragraph first appeared,

seventy-nine royal censors had been appointed, and no book could be

printed without their permission.

[852] The last sentence of the above paragraph was added in the fifth

edition of the “Characters,” published in 1690, about one year after

Fénelon had been appointed teacher of the Duke of Burgundy, the

grandson of Louis XIV. Fénelon became archbishop of Cambrai in 1695.

[853] See page 27, note 2. Several eminent divines had already written

against “freethinkers,” and about a year before the first edition of

the “Characters” appeared, Fénelon preached a sermon against them.

Those freethinkers were not deists nor atheists, but somewhat like

those persons, at present called agnostics, who neither affirm nor

deny anything, but simply state that they know nothing for certain.

Among their sect might be reckoned at the time our author wrote the

celebrated traveller Bernier, Saint Evremond, Bayle, Fontenelle,

Chaulieu, La Fare, the Dukes de Nevers and de Bouillon, the Grand Prior

de Vendôme, and many others.

[854] The French name for “freethinker” is _esprit fort_, literally

“strong mind.”

[855] Another play on words in the original on _esprit fort_ and

_esprit faible_.

[856] This is perhaps an allusion to the traveller F. Bernier, a pupil

of Gassendi, who visited Assyria, Egypt, and India, and published a

narrative of his travels in 1670.

[857] _Libertin_ was another name for freethinker in French. See p.

161, note 1.

[858] The original has _une personne libre_, to which our author adds

in a note, _une fille_.

[859] An allusion to some such men as the Duke de la Feuillade, the

Minister de Louvois, and the Marquis de Seignelay, who have been

mentioned before, and who almost all died after a very short illness.

[860] Whenever our author has an opportunity he always opposes _esprits

forts_ to _esprits faibles_, or _faibles génies_, as in the above

paragraph.

[861] Leo I., bishop of Rome, called the Great, died 461; St. Jerome

(331-420) was one of the fathers of the Latin Church. For Basil and

Augustine (see page 446, note 1, and page 447, note 1.)

[862] _Spécieux_ in the original, with the Latin meaning.

[863] This is perhaps a hit at Malebrancheʼs _Nouvelle Métaphysique_.

[864] At the time our author wrote it was the custom to allow masked

people to enter a ball-room.

[865] In “A New Historical Relation of Siam,” by M. de la Loubère

(see page 155, note 2), we find: “The priests are the Talapoins....

They have umbrellas in the form of a screen which they carry in their

hand.... In Siamese they call them ‘Talapat,’ and it is probable that

from hence comes the name of ‘Talapir’ or ‘Talapoin,’ which is in use

among foreigners only.” The embassy from the King of Siam to Louis XIV.

took place in the year 1686. See page 338, note 3.

[866] In 1685, when this paragraph was first published, La Bruyère was

forty years old.

[867] St. Augustin (see page 447, note 1) and Descartes (see page 150,

§ 56) had already made use of the above argument.

[868] Our author adds in a note: “An objection to the system of

freethinkers.” An allusion to the system of Spinosa, which Fénelon also

attempted to refute in his _Traité de lʼexistence de Dieu_.

[869] “This is what freethinkers bring forward,” says La Bruyère in a

note. He means probably the disciples of Gassendi, and followers of the

systems of Epicurus and Lucretius.

[870] This is Descartesʼ doctrine.

[871] Lucilius is supposed to have been the Duke of Bourbon, the pupil

of La Bruyère, and the spot of ground, the park of Chantilly, the seat

of the Condé family. (See page 25, § 48.)

[872] Instead of the Nonette and the Thève, two small rivers canalised

by order of the Prince de Condé, our author names two other small

streams, the Yvette, which has its source near Rambouillet, and the

Lignon, an affluent of the Loire.

[873] André le Nôtre, a celebrated landscape-gardener, laid out the

gardens of Versailles and Chantilly, and died in 1700.

[874] The calculations of La Bruyère were not always exact; thus the

mass of the moon is eighty-nine times less than the earthʼs; it is 2165

miles in diameter, and revolves at a mean distance of 238,800 miles

round the earth.

[875] Our author argues as if he were no believer in the system of

Copernicus (1473-1543), but he only states that the sun appears to move

through the firmament, for on page 484 he distinctly mentions that “the

earth is carried round the sun.”

[876] If we suppose that the earth is immovable, the moon moves at a

rate of more than eighteen hundred thousand miles a day, but in reality

it moves at the rate of about sixty thousand miles during twenty-four

hours.

[877] Sound travels at the rate of more than nine hundred miles per

hour.

[878] It is in reality a hundred and ten times more.

[879] Its absolute diameter is 860,000 miles.

[880] The volume of the sun is equivalent to about one and a quarter

million times the volume of our earth; but its mean density is only a

quarter of that of the earth.

[881] The mean distance of the sun from the earth, is, according to the

latest results, about 92,400,000 miles.

[882] Saturnʼs volume is 686.7 that of the earth; it is the sixth

planet in order of distance from the sun, and describes in 10,795,22

days, or twenty-nine years five months and fourteen days, an orbit

whose semi-major axis is 872,137,000 miles. In our authorʼs time Saturn

was supposed to be the planet the farthest from the sun. See page 135,

note 4.

[883] “Immensurable” is a word La Bruyère tried to naturalise

in French, but he did not succeed, yet it exists in English;

“incommensurable” is to be found in both languages.

[884] According to Aragoʼs _Leçons dʼAstronomie_ the star nearest the

earth is still 22,800,000,000,000 leagues distant from it.

[885] No south polar star exists.

[886] Though the number of stars visible to the naked eye is not more

than five thousand, thousands of millions of stars are in existence of

which only about a hundred thousand have been observed.

[887] See page 479, note 2. The sun is not the centre of the universe,

but of our planetary system.

[888] The atomic system of philosophy started by Leucippus, and adopted

by Epicurus, Democritus, and many other philosophers, was that the

universe, material and mental, consisted of minute, indivisible,

and impenetrable atoms, which atoms were assumed to be the ultimate

ground of nature, whilst necessity was supposed to be the cause of all

existence.

[889] According to Descartesʼ _Discours de la Méthode_, animal spirits,

which are so often mentioned in the philosophical and moral works of

his time, “are like a very subtle mind, or rather like a very pure and

bright flame, which is continually and in great abundance ascending

from the heart to the brain, proceeds from thence through the nerves

into the muscles, and produces motion in all the members of the body.”

[890] Pascal already in his _Pensées_ (i. 6.) had called man “a

thinking reed ... nobler than the universe, even if it were to crush

him, because he knows he has to die.”

[891] In the original _ouvrier_. See page 159, note 1.

[892] Similar ideas as those expressed in the above paragraph are to

be found in a sermon “On Providence” preached by Bossuet at the Louvre

in 1662, which was not printed until long after he and La Bruyère were

dead. But as the two men were great friends, it is not unlikely that

our author may have heard them expressed by the eloquent pulpit orator,

either in private conversation or in a sermon.

[893] See the chapter “Of Opinions,” page 364, § 104.

THE END.

PRINTED BY BALLANTYNE, HANSON AND CO.

EDINBURGH AND LONDON.

The "Characters" of Jean de La Bruyère · 第 37 / 37 段