FATHER AND JUDGE

'If ye call on Him as Father, who without respect of persons

judgeth according to every man's work, pass the time of your

sojourning here in fear.'--1 Peter i. 17.

'If ye call on Him as Father,' when ye pray, say, 'Our Father which art

in heaven.' One can scarcely help supposing that the Apostle is here, as

in several other places in his letter, alluding to words that are

stamped ineffaceably upon his memory, because they had dropped from

Christ's lips. At all events, whether there is here a distinct allusion

to what we call the Lord's Prayer or no, it is here recognised as the

universal characteristic of Christian people that their prayers are

addressed to God in the character of Father. So that we may say that

there is no Christianity which does not recognise and rejoice in

appealing to the paternal relationship.

But, then, I suppose in Peter's days, as in our days, there were people

that so fell in love with one aspect of the Divine nature that they had

no eyes for any other; and who so magnified the thought of the Father

that they forgot the thought of the Judge. That error has been committed

over and over again in all ages, so that the Church as a whole, one may

say, has gone swaying from one extreme to the other, and has rent these

two conceptions widely apart, and sometimes has been foolish enough to

pit them against each other instead of doing as Peter does here,

braiding them together as both conspiring to one result, the production

in the Christian heart of a wholesome awe. If ye call on Him as Father

'who, without respect of persons, judgeth according to every man's

work, pass the time of your sojourning in fear.'

So then, look at this twofold aspect of God's character.

Both these conceptions ought to be present, flamingly and vividly,

burning there before him, to every Christian man. 'Ye call Him Father,'

but the Father is the Judge. True, the Judge is Father, but Peter

reminds us that whatever blessed truths may be hived in that great Name

of Father, to be drawn thence by devout meditation and filial love,

there is not included in it the thought of weak-minded indulgence to His

children, in any of their sins, nor any unlikelihood of inflicting penal

consequences on a rebellious child. 'Father' does not exclude 'Judge,'

'and without respect of persons He judg_eth_.'

'Without respect of persons'--the word is a somewhat unusual New

Testament one, but it has special appropriateness and emphasis on

Peter's lips. Do you remember who it was that said, and on what occasion

he said it: 'Now I perceive that God is no respecter of persons'? It was

Peter when he had learned the lesson on the housetop at Joppa, looking

out over the Mediterranean, and had it enforced by Cornelius' message.

The great thought that had blazed upon him as a new discovery on that

never-be-forgotten occasion, comes before him again, and this unfamiliar

word comes with it, and he says, 'without respect of persons He judges.'

Mountains are elevated, valleys are depressed and sunken, but I fancy

that the difference between the top of Mount Everest and the gorge

through which the Jordan runs would scarcely be perceptible if you were

standing on the sun. Thus, 'without respect of persons,' great men and

little, rich men and poor, educated men and illiterate, people that

perch themselves on their little stools and think themselves high above

their fellows: they are all on one dead level in the eye of the Judge.

And this question is as to the quality of the work and not as to the

dignity of the doer. 'Without respect of persons' implies universality

as well as impartiality. If a Christian man has been ever so near God,

and then goes away from Him, he is judged notwithstanding his past

nearness. And if a poor soul, all crusted over with his sins and leprous

with the foulness of long-standing iniquity, comes to God and asks for

pardon, he is judged according to his penitence, 'without respect of

persons.' That great hand holds an even balance. And though the

strictness of the judicial process may have its solemn and its awful

aspect, it has also its blessed and its comforting one.

Now, do not run away with the notion that the Apostle is speaking here

of that great White Throne and the future judgment that for many of us

lies, inoperative on our creeds, on the other side of the great cleft of

death. That is a solemn thought, but it is not Peter's thought here. If

any of you can refer to the original, you will see that even more

strongly than in our English version, though quite sufficiently strongly

there, the conception is brought out of a continuous Divine judgment

running along, all through a man's life, side by side with his work. The

judgment here meant is not all clotted together, as it were, in that

final act of judgment, leaving the previous life without it, but it runs

all through the ages, all through each man's days. I beseech you to

ponder that thought, that at each moment of each of our lives an

estimate of the moral character of each of our deeds is present to the

Divine mind.

'Of course we believe that,' you say. 'That is commonplace; not worth

talking about.' Ah! but because we believe it, as of course, we slip out

of thinking about it and letting it affect our lives. And what I desire

to do for you, dear friends, and for myself, is just to put emphasis on

the one half of that little word 'judgeth' and ask you to take its three

last letters and lay them on your minds. Do we feel that, moment by

moment, these little spurs of bad temper, these little gusts of

worldliness, that tiny, evanescent sting of pride and devildom which has

passed across or been fixed in our minds, are all present to God, and

that He has judged them already, in the double sense that He has

appraised their value and estimated their bearing upon our characters,

and that He has set in motion some of the consequences which we shall

have to reap?

Oh! one sometimes wishes that people did not so much believe in a future

judgment, in so far as it obscures to them the solemn thought of a

present and a continuous one. 'Verily, there is a God that _judgeth_ in

the earth,' and, of course, all these provisional decisions, which are

like the documents that in Scotch law are said to 'precognosce the

case,' are all laid away in the archives of heaven, and will be

produced, docketed and in order, at the last for each of us. Christian

people sometimes abuse the doctrine of justification by faith as if it

meant that Christians at the last were not to be judged. But they are,

and there is such a thing as 'salvation yet so as by fire,' and such a

thing as salvation in fulness. Do not let filial confidence drive out

legitimate fear.

He 'judges according to every man's work.' I do not think it is

extravagant attention to niceties to ask you to notice that the Apostle

does not say 'works,' but 'work'; as if all the separate actions were

gathered into a great whole, as indeed they are, because they are all

the products of one mind and character. The trend and drift, so to

speak, of our life, rather than its isolated actions and the underlying

motives, in their solemn totality and unity, these are the materials of

this Divine judgment.

Now, let me say a word about the disposition which the Apostle enjoins

upon us in the view of these facts.

The Judge is the Father, the Father is the Judge. The one statement

proclaims the merciful, compassionate, paternal judgment, the other the

judicial Fatherhood. And what comes from the combination of these two

ideas, which thus modify and illuminate one another? 'Pass the time of

your sojourning here in fear.' What a descent that sounds from the

earlier verses of the letter: 'In whom, though now ye see Him not, yet

believing, ye rejoice with joy unspeakable and full of glory, receiving

the end of your faith, even the salvation of your souls.' Down from

those heights of 'joy unspeakable,' and 'already glorified,' the apostle

drops plump into _this_ dungeon: 'Pass the time of your sojourning here

in fear.' Of course, I need not remind you that the 'fear' here is not

the 'fear which hath torment'; in fact, I do not think that it is a fear

that refers to God at all. It is not a sentiment or emotion of which God

is the object. It is not the reverent awe which often appears in

Scripture as 'the fear of God,' which is a kind of shorthand expression

for all modes of devout sentiment and emotion; but it is a fear, knowing

our own weakness and the strong temptations that are round us, of

falling into sin. That is the one thing to be afraid of in this world.

If a man rightly understood what he is here for, then the only thing

that he would be terrified for would be that he should miss the purpose

of his being here and lose his hold of God thereby. There is nothing

else worth being afraid of, but that _is_ worth being afraid of. It is

not slavish dread, nor is it cowardice, but the well-grounded emotion of

men that know themselves too well to be confident and know the world too

well to be daring and presumptuous.

Don't you think that Peter had had a pretty rough experience in his life

that had taught him the wisdom of such an exhortation? And does it not

strike you as very beautiful that it should come, of all people in the

world, from his lips? The man that had said, 'Though all should forsake

Thee, yet will not I.' 'Why cannot I follow Thee now?' 'Bid me come to

Thee on the water.' 'This be far from Thee, Lord, it shall not be unto

Thee'--the man that had whipped out his sword in the garden, in a spasm

of foolish affection, now, in his quiet old age, when he has learnt the

lesson of failures and follies and sins and repentance, says in effect:

'Remember me, and do not you be presumptuous.' 'Pass the time of your

sojourning here in fear.' 'If I had known myself a little better, and

been a little more afraid of myself, I should not have made such a fool

of myself or such shipwreck of my faithfulness.'

Dear friends, no mature Christian is so advanced as that he does not

need this reminder, and no Christian novice is so feeble as that,

keeping obedient to this precept, he will not be victorious over all his

evils. The strongest needs to fear; the weakest, fearing, is safe. For

such fearfulness is indispensable to safety. It is all very well to go

along with sail extended and a careless look-out. But if, for instance,

a captain keeps such when he is making the mouth of the Red Sea where

there are a narrow channel and jagged rocks and a strong current, if he

has not every man at his quarters and everything ready to let go and

stop in a moment, he will be sure to be on the reefs before he has tried

the experiment often. And the only safety for any of us is ever to be on

the watch, and to dread our own weakness. 'Blessed is the man that

feareth always.'

Such carefulness over conduct and heart is fully compatible with all the

blessed emotions to which it seems at first antagonistic. There is no

discord between the phrase that I have quoted about 'joy unspeakable and

full of glory,' and this temper, but rather the two help one another.

And such blended confidence and fear are the parents of courage. The man

that is afraid that he will do wrong and so hurt himself and grieve his

Saviour, is the man that will never be afraid of anything else. Martyrs

have gone to the stake 'fearing not them that kill the body, and after

that have no more that they can do,' because they were so afraid to sin

against God that they were not afraid to die rather than to do it. And

that is the temper that you and I should have. Let that one fear, like

Moses' rod, swallow up all the other serpents and make our hearts

impervious to any other dread.

'Pass the time of your _sojourning_.' You do not live in your own

country, you are in an alien land. You are passing through it. Troops on

the march in an enemy's country, unless they are led by an idiot, will

send out clouds of scouts in front and on the wings to give timeous

warning of any attempted assault. If we cheerily and carelessly go

through this world as if we were marching in a land where there were no

foes, there is nothing before us but defeat at the last. Only let us

remember that sleepless watchfulness is needed only in this time of

sojourning, and that when we get to our own country there is no need

for such patrols and advance guards and rearguards and men on the flank

as were essential when we were on the march. People that grow exotic

plants here in England keep them in glass houses. But when they are

taken to their native soil the glass would be an impertinence. As long

as we are here we have to wear our armour, but when we get yonder the

armour can safely be put off and the white robes that had to be tucked

up under it lest they should be soiled by the muddy ways can be let

down, for they will gather no pollution from the golden streets. The

gates of that city do not need to be shut, day nor night. For when sin

has ceased and our liability to yield to temptation has been exchanged

for fixed adhesion to the Lord Himself, then, and not till then, is it

safe to put aside the armour of godly fear and to walk, unguarded and

unarmed, in the land of perpetual peace.

Expositions of Holy Scripture Ephesians; Epistles of St. Peter and St. John · 第 223 / 309 题