II.

"To begin then; my first object will be to make my meaning perfectly

plain. The thing to do will be to take fencing in its broad outlines.

It would be labour thrown away to enter the bewildering labyrinth of

those interminable details, which after all are nothing more than the

mathematical extension of elementary principles, which may be continued

to infinity.

"Fencing in its infancy had to feel its way; its methods were yet to

be found, its possibilities to be explored. Little by little, as one

period succeeded another and the art became in many respects perfected,

changes were introduced, and especially changes that tended to greater

simplicity. Old theories became old fashioned and were thrown aside to

make room for new doctrines.

"Fencing, in fact, was developed like most other things. But we must

not lose sight of the fact that the early methods of the old masters,

both in Italy and France, date from the sixteenth or seventeenth

century, and that the weapons employed in those days differed

materially from ours in shape, weight, and function. The change of

weapon has naturally led to a change of method.

"It would doubtless be interesting to the antiquary to trace the

successive changes that have taken place in sword-play, and to compare

it as it exists to-day with what it was in 1536, when Marozzo wrote his

treatise on the sword. (Pray excuse my erudition.) The sword of that

period was a wide straight blade with two cutting edges. I need not say

that Marozzo was Italian. The first French work on the subject was,

I believe, a treatise by Henri de Saint-Didier, which was published

in 1573, and dedicated to Charles IX. At that time France was a long

way behind Italy, where for twenty years already the edge had been

abandoned for the point.

"It is not my intention to retrace the abstruse history of the

development of swordsmanship; such an inquiry would, however, prove

that in all ages the new truths were invariably denied before they

established themselves as accomplished facts. There is no need then,

as you will doubtless be relieved to hear, to discuss the systems of

antiquity; we will pass over the intervening periods without further

preface, and come down at once to modern times.

Secrets of the Sword · 第 15 / 132 题