Yet all the Norman clergy were not such as these, and never should be

forgotten the beautiful answer of Guimond, a monk of St. Leufroi, such

a priest as Fitz-Richard was a knight. William had summoned him to

England, and he came without delay; but when he was told it was for the

purpose of raising him to high dignity, he spoke thus: “Many causes

forbid me to seek dignity and power; I will not mention all. I will only

say that I see not how I could ever properly be the head of men whose

manners and language I do not understand, and whose fathers, brothers,

and friends, have been slain by your sword, disinherited, exiled,

imprisoned, or harshly enslaved by you. Search the Holy Scriptures

whether any law permits that the shepherd should be forced on the flock

by their enemy. Can you divide what you have won by war and bloodshed,

with one who has laid aside his own goods for the sake of Christ? All

priests are forbidden to meddle with rapine, or to take any share of the

prey, even as an offering at the altar; for, as the Scriptures say,

‘He that bringeth an offering of the goods of the poor, is as one

that slayeth the son before the father’s eyes.’ When I remember these

commands of God, I am filled with terror; I look on England as one great

prey, and dread to touch it or its treasures, as I should a red-hot

iron.”

Guimond then returned to Normandy, uninjured by the Conqueror, who,

with all his faults, never took offence at such rebukes; but the

worldly-minded clergy were excessively affronted at his censure of their

rapacity, and raised such a persecution against him that he was obliged

to take refuge in Italy.

As soon as the news arrived at the Camp of Refuge that the warlike

Thorold had been appointed to Peterborough, Hereward and his hand

hastened to the Abbey, and, probably with the consent of the Saxon

monks, carried off all the treasures into the midst of the fens.

Thorold, with one hundred and sixty men-at-arms, soon made his

appearance, was installed as Abbot, and quickly made friends with his

Norman neighbor, Ivo Taillebois.

They agreed to make an expedition against the robber Saxons, and united

their forces, but Thorold appears to have been not quite as willing to

face Hereward as to threaten his monks, and let Ivo advance into the

midst of an extensive wood of alders, while he remained in the rear with

some other Normans of distinction. Ivo sought through the whole wood

without meeting a Saxon, and returning to the spot where he had left

the Abbot, found no one there, for Hereward had quitted the wood on the

opposite side, made a circuit, and falling suddenly on Thorold and his

party, carried them off to the fens, and kept them there till they had

paid a heavy ransom.

In 1072, the fifth year of the Camp of Refuge, it had assumed so

formidable an aspect, that William thought it necessary to take vigorous

measures against it, more especially as there had been lately a

commencement of correspondence with the Danes. The difficulty was to

reach it, for the treacherous ground of the fens afforded no firm

footing for an army; there was not water enough for boats, no station

for archers, no space for a charge of the ponderous knights, amongst the

reedy pools. William decided on constructing a causeway, and employed

workmen to cut trenches to drain off the water, and raise the bank of

stones and turf, under the superintendence of Ivo Taillebois. However,

Hereward was on the alert, harassing them perpetually, breaking on

them sometimes on one side, sometimes on the other, in such strange,

unexpected ways, that at last the viscount came to the conclusion that

he must have magic arts to aid him, and persuaded the king to let him

send for a witch to work against him by counter spells. Accordingly, she

was installed in a wooden tower raised at the end of the part of the

causeway which was completed, and the workmen were beginning to advance

boldly under her protection, when suddenly smoke and flame came driving

upon them. Hereward had set fire to the dry reeds, and, spreading

quickly, the flame cut off their retreat, and the unhappy woman

perished, with many of the Normans.

Again and again were the Norman attacks disconcerted, and all that

they could attempt was a blockade, which lasted many months, and might

probably have been sustained many more by the hardy warriors, if some of

the monks of Ely, growing weary of the privations they endured, had not

gone in secret to the king, and offered to show him a way across the

Marches, on condition that the wealth of the Abbey was secured.

Accordingly, a band of Normans crossed the fens, took the Saxons by

surprise, killed a thousand men, and forced the camp. Hereward and his

five comrades still fought on, crossed bogs where the enemy did not dare

to follow them, and at length escaped into the low lands of Lincoln,

where they met with some Saxon fishermen, who were in the habit of

supplying a Norman station of soldiers. These Saxons willingly received

the warriors into their boats, and hid them under heaps of straw, while

they carried their fish as usual to the Normans. While the Normans were

in full security, Hereward and his men suddenly attacked them, killed

some, put the rest to flight, and seized their horses.

Collecting others of his scattered followers, Hereward kept up his

warfare from his own house at Bourn, continually harassing the Normans,

until at length he took prisoner his old enemy, Ivo Taillebois, and,

as the price of his liberty, required him to make his peace with the

Conqueror. This was good news to William, who highly esteemed his valor

and constancy, and could accuse him of no breach of faith, since he had

made no engagements to him. Hereward was therefore received as a subject

of King William, retained his own estate, and died there at a good old

age, respected by both Saxons and Normans.

There is, indeed, an old Norman-French poem, that declares it was for

the love of a noble Saxon lady, named Alftrude, that Hereward ceased to

struggle with the victors. According to this story, Alftrude, an heiress

of great wealth, was so charmed by the report of Hereward’s fame, that

she offered him her hand, and persuaded him to make peace with William.

It is further said, that one afternoon, as he lay asleep under a tree,

a band of armed men, among whom were several Bretons, surrounded and

murdered him, though not till he had slain fifteen of them.

But this story is not likely to be true, since we know that Hereward

was already married, and the testimony of more than one ancient English

chronicler declares that he spent his latter years in peace and honor.

He was the only one of the Saxon chieftains who thus closed his days in

his native home--the only one who had not sought to preserve his own

possessions at the expense of his country, and who had broken no oaths

nor engagements. His exploits are told in old ballads and half-romantic

histories, and it is not safe to believe them implicitly, but his

existence and his gallant resistance are certain.

Many years after, the remains of a wooden fort, the citadel, so to

speak of the Camp of Refuge, still existed in the Isle of Ely, and was

called by the peasantry Hereward’s Castle. The treacherous monks of Ely

were well punished by having forty men-at-arms quartered on their Abbey.

Of the captives taken in the camp, many were most cruelly treated, their

eyes put out, and their hands cut off; others were imprisoned, and many

slain. Morkar, who was here taken, spent the rest of his life in

the same captivity as Ulfnoth, Stigand, and many other Saxons of

distinction, with the one gleam of hope when liberated at William’s

death, and then the bitter disappointment of renewed seizure and

captivity. If it could be any consolation to them, these Saxons were not

William’s only captives. Bishop Odo, of Bayeux, whom William had made

Earl of Kent, after giving a great deal of trouble to his brother the

king, and to Archbishop Lanfranc, by his avarice and violence, heard a

prediction that the next Pope should be named Odo, and set off to try

to bring about its fulfilment in his own person, carrying with him an

immense quantity of ill-gotten treasure, and a large number of troops,

commanded by Hugh the Wolf, Earl of Chester.

However, Odo had reckoned without King William, and he had but just set

sail, when William, setting off from Normandy, met him in the Channel,

took his ships, and making him land in the Isle of Wight, and convoking

an assembly of knights, declared his offences, and asked them what such

a brother deserved.

Between fear of the king and fear of the Bishop, no one ventured to

answer, upon which William sentenced him to imprisonment; and when he

declared that no one but the Pope had a right to judge him, answered, “I

do not try you, the Bishop of Bayeux, but the Earl of Kent,” and sent

him closely guarded to Normandy.

Another Norman state-prisoner was Roger Fitzosborn, the son of William’s

early friend, who had died soon after the Conquest. Roger’s offence was

the bestowing his sister Emma in marriage without the consent of the

king, and in addition, much seditious language was used at the wedding

banquet, where, unhappily, was present Waltheof, Earl of Huntingdon, the

last Saxon noble.

Roger, finding himself in danger, broke out into open rebellion, but was

soon made prisoner. Still the king would have pardoned him for the

sake of his father, whom William seems to have regarded with much more

affection that he be stowed on any one else, and, as a mark of kindness,

sent him a costly robe. The proud and passionate Roger, disdaining the

gift, kindled a fire, and burnt the garment on the dungeon floor; and

William, deeply affronted, swore in return that he should never pass the

threshold of his prison.

Waltheof, who was innocent of all save being present at the unfortunate

feast, might have been spared but for the wickedness of his wife,

Judith, William’s niece, who had been married to him when it was her

uncle’s policy to conciliate the Saxons. She hated and despised the

Saxon churl given her for a lord, kind, generous, and pious though he

was; and having set her affections on a young Norman, herself became the

accuser of her husband. Waltheof succeeded in disproving the calumnies,

and the best and wisest Normans spoke in his favor; but the spite of Ivo

Taillebois, and the hatred of his wife, prevailed, and he was sentenced

to die.

He was executed at Winchester, where, lest the inhabitants should

attempt a rescue, he was led out, early in the morning, to St. Giles’s

hill, outside the walls. He wore the robes of an earl, and gave them to

the priests who attended him, and to the poor people who followed him.

When he came to the spot he knelt down to pray, begging the soldiers to

wait till he had said the Lord’s Prayer; but he had only come to “Lead

us not into temptation,” when one of them severed his head from his body

with one blow of a sword.

His body was hastily thrown into a hole; but the Saxons, who loved him

greatly, disinterred it in secret, and contrived to carry it all the way

to Croyland, where it was buried with due honors, and we may think of

Hereward le Wake attending the funeral of the son of the stalwart old

Siward Biorn.

As to the perfidious Judith, she reaped the reward of her crimes; she

was not permitted to marry her Norman lover, and he was stripped of all

the wealth she expected as the widow of Waltbeof. This was secured to

her infant daughter, and was so considerable, that at one time William

thought the little Matilda of Huntingdon a fit match for his son Robert;

but Robert despised the Saxon blood, and made this project an excuse for

one of his rebellions. Matilda was, however, a royal bride, since her

hand was given to David I. of Scotland, the representative of the old

race of Cerdic, and a most excellent prince, with whom she was much

happier than she could well have: been with the unstable Robert

Courtheuse.

CAMEO IX. THE LAST SAXON BISHOP. (1008-1095.)

_Kings of England_.

1066. William I.

1087. William II.

The last saint of the Anglo-Saxon Church, the Bishop who lived from the

days of Edward the Confessor, to the evil times of the Red King, was

Wulstan of Worcester, a homely old man, of plain English character, and

of great piety. The quiet, even tenor of his life is truly like a “soft

green isle” in the midst of the turbulent storms and tempests of the

Norman Conquest.

Wulstan was born at Long Itchington, a village in Warwickshire, in the

time of Ethelred the Unready. He was the son of the Thane Athelstan, and

was educated in the monasteries of Evesham and Peterborough. When he had

been trained in such learning as these could afford, he came home for

a few years, and entered into the sports and occupations of the noble

youths of the time, without parting with the piety and purity of his

conventual life, and steadily resisting temptation.

His parents were grown old, and having become impoverished, perhaps by

the exactions perpetrated either by the Danes, or to bribe them away,

retired from the world, and entered convents at Worcester. Wulstan,

wishing to devote himself to the Church, sought the service of the

Bishop, who ordained him to the priesthood.

He lived, though a secular priest, with monastic strictness, and in time

obtained permission from the Bishop to become a monk in the convent,

where he continued for twenty-five years, and at length became Prior of

the Convent. The Prior was the person next in office to the Abbot, and

governed the monastery in his absence; and in some religious orders,

where there was no Abbot, the Prior was the superior.

Wulstan’s habits in the convent show us what the devotional life of

that time was. Each day he bent the knee at each verse of the seven

Penitential Psalms, and the same at the 119th Psalm at night. He would

lock himself into the church, and pray aloud with tears and cries, and

at night he would often retire into some solitary spot, the graveyard,

or lonely village church, to pray and meditate. His bed was the church

floor, or a narrow board, and stern were his habits of fasting and

mortification; but all the time he was full of activity in the cause of

the poor, and, finishing his devotions early in the morning, gave up the

whole day to attend to the common people, sitting at the church door to

listen to, and redress, as far as in him lay, the grievances that they

brought him--at any rate, to console and advise. The rude, secular

country clergy, at that time, it may be feared, a corrupt, untaught

race, had in great measure ceased to instruct or exhort their flocks,

and even refund baptism without payment. He did his best to remedy these

abuses, and from all parts of the country children were brought to

the good Prior for baptism. Every Sunday, too, he preached, and the

Worcestershire people flocked from all sides to hear his plain, forcible

language, though he never failed to rebuke them sharply for their most

prevalent sins.

The fame of the holy Prior of Worcester began to spread, and on one

occasion Earl Harold himself came thirty miles out of his way to confess

his sins to him and desire his prayers.

About the year 1062, two Roman Cardinals came to Worcester with Aldred,

who had just been translated from that see to the Archbishopric of

York. They spent the whole of Lent in Wulstan’s monastery; and when,

at Easter, they returned to the court of Edward the Confessor, they

recommended him for the Bishop to succeed Aldred; and Aldred himself,

Archbishop Stigand, and Harold, all concurred in the same advice. The

people and clergy of Worcester with one voice chose the good Prior

Wulstan; his election was confirmed by the king, and he received the

appointment. He long struggled against it, protesting that he would

rather lose his head than be made a Bishop; but he was persuaded at last

by an old hermit, who rebuked him for his resistance as for a sin. He

received the pastoral staff from King Edward, and was consecrated by his

former Bishop, Aldred.

As a Bishop he was more active than ever, constantly riding from place

to place to visit the different towns and villages; and, as he went,

repeating the Psalms and Litany, his attendant priests making the

responses; while his chamberlain carried a purse, from which every one

who asked alms was sure to be supplied. He never passed a church without

praying in it, and never reached his resting-place for the night without

paying his first visit to the church. Wherever he went, crowds of every

rank poured out to meet him, and he never sent them away without the

full Church service, and a sermon; nay, more--each poor serf might come

to him, pour out his troubles, whether temporal, or whether his heart

had been touched by the good words he had heard. Above all, Wulstan

delighted in giving his blessing in Confirmation, and would go on from

morning till night without food, till all his clergy were worn out,

though he seemed to know no weariness.

His clergy seem to have had much of the sluggishness of the Saxon, and

were often impatient of a temper, both of devotion and energy, so much

beyond them. If one was absent from the night service, the Bishop would

take no notice till it was over; but when all the others were gone back

to bed, he would wake the defaulter, and make him go through the service

with no companion but himself, making the responses. They did not like

him to put them out, as he often did on their journeys, while going

through the Psalms, by dwelling on the “prayer-verses;” and most

especially did they dislike his leading them to church, whatever season

or weather it might be, to chant matins before it was light. Once, at

Marlow, when it was a long way to church, very muddy, and with a cold

rain falling, one of his clergy, in hopes of making him turn back, led

him into the worst part of the swamp, where he sunk up to his knees in

mud, and lost his shoe; but he took no notice until, after the service

was over, he had returned to his lodgings, half dead with cold, and

then, instead of expressing any anger, he only ordered search to be made

for the shoe.

Wulstan took no part in what we should call politics; he thought it his

duty to render his submission to the King whom the people had chosen,

and to strive only to amend the life of the men of the country. He was

in high favor with Harold during his short reign, and was for some time

at court, where the fine Saxon gentlemen learnt to dread the neighborhood

of the old Bishop; for Wulstan considered their luxury as worthy of blame,

and especially attacked their long flowing hair. If any of them placed

their heads within, his reach, he would crop off “the first-fruits of

their curls” with his own little knife, enjoining them to have the rest

cut off; and yet, if Wulstan saw the children of the choir with their

dress disordered, he would smooth it with his own hands, and when told

the condescension did not become a Bishop, made answer, “He that is

greatest among you shall be your servant.”

Aldred, Wulstan’s former Bishop, now Archbishop of York, was the

anointer of both Harold and William the Conqueror. He kept fair with the

Normans as long as he could, but at last, driven to extremity by the

miseries they inflicted on his unhappy diocese, he went to William

arrayed in his full episcopal robes, solemnly revoked his coronation

blessing, denounced a curse on him and his race, and then, returning to

York, there died of grief.

Eghelwin, Bishop of Durham, gave good advice to Comyn, the Norman Earl,

but it was unheeded, and the townsmen rose in the night and burnt Comyn

to death, with all his followers, as they lay overcome with wine and

sleep in the plundered houses. The rising of the northern counties

followed, and Eghelwin was so far involved in it, that he was obliged to

fly. He took shelter in the Camp of Refuge, was made prisoner when

it was betrayed, and spent the rest of his life in one of William’s

prisons.

Our good Wulstan had a happier lot, and spent his time in his own round

of quiet duties in his diocese, binding up the wounds inflicted by the

cruel oppressors, but exhorting the Saxons to bear them patiently, and

see in them the chastisement of their own crimes. “It is the scourge of

God that ye are suffering,” he said; and when they replied that they

had never been half so bad as the Normans, he said, “God is using their

wickedness to punish your evil deserts, as the devil, of his own evil

will, yet by God’s righteous will, punishes those with whom he suffers.

Do ye, when ye are angry, care what becomes of the staff wherewith ye

strike?”

He had his own share of troubles and anxieties, but he met them in his

trustful spirit, and straight-forward way. At Easter, 1070, a council

was held at Winchester, at which he was summoned to attend. He was one

of the five last Saxon Bishops; Stigand, who held both at once the

primacy and the see of Winchester; his brother, Eghelmar, Bishop of

Elmham; Eghelsie, of Selsey; and the Bishop of Durham, Eghelwin, who was

in the Camp of Refuge.

Two cardinals were present to represent the Pope, and on account of his

simony, Stigand was deposed and imprisoned, while Eghelric and Eghelmar

were also degraded. Yet Wulstan, clear of conscience, and certain of the

validity of his own election, was not affrighted; so far from it, he

boldly called on the King to restore some lands that Aldred of York had

kept back from the see of Worcester.

Thomas, Aldred’s successor, claimed them by a pretended jurisdiction

over Worcester, and the decision was put off for a court of the

great men of the realm, which did not take place till several fresh

appointments had been made. Lanfranc, the Italian, Abbot of Bec, had

become Archbishop of Canterbury, and was, of course, interested in

guarding the jurisdiction of the Archiepiscopal see.

Wulstan, in this critical time, was exactly like himself. He fell asleep

while Thomas was arguing, and when time was given him to think of his

answer, he spent it in singing the service of the hour, though his

priests were in terror lest they should be ridiculed for it. “Know you

not,” he answered, “that the Lord hath said, ‘When ye stand before king

and rulers, take no thought what ye shall speak, for it shall be given

you in that hour what ye shall speak.’ Our Lord can give me speech

to-day to defend my right, and overthrow their might.” Accordingly, his

honest statement prevailed, and he gained his cause.

There is a beautiful legend that Lanfranc, thinking the simple old

Saxon too rude and ignorant for his office, summoned him to a synod at

Westminster, and there called on him to deliver up his pastoral staff

and ring. Wulstan rose, and said he had known from the first that he was

not worthy of his dignity, and had taken it only at the bidding of his

master, King Edward. To him, therefore, who gave the staff, he would

resign it. Advancing to the Confessor’s tomb, he said, “Master, thou

knowest how unwillingly I took this office, forced to it by thee. Behold

a new king--a new law--a new primate; they decree new rights, and

promulgate new statutes. Thee they accuse of error in having so

commanded--me of presumption, in having obeyed. Then, indeed, thou wast

liable to err, being mortal--now, being with God, thou canst not err.

Not to these who require what they did not give, but to thee, who hast

given, I render up my staff. Take this, my master, and deliver it to

whom thou wilt.”

He laid it on the tomb, took off his episcopal robes, and sat down

among the monks. The legend goes on to say, that the staff remained

embedded in the stone, and no hand could wrench it away, till Wulstan

himself again took it up, when it yielded without effort. The King and

Archbishop fell down at his feet, and entreated his pardon and blessing.

Such is the story told a century after; and surely we may believe that,

without the miracle, the old man’s touching appeal to his dead King, and

his humility, convinced Lanfranc that it had been foul shame to think

of deposing such a man because his learning was not extensive, nor his

manners like those of the courtly Norman. Be that as it may, thenceforth

Lanfranc and Wulstan worked hand in hand, and we find the Archbishop

begging him to undertake the visitation of the diocese of Chester, which

was unsafe for the Norman prelates. One great work accomplished by the

help of Wulstan was, the putting an end to a horrible slave-trade with

Ireland, whither Saxon serfs were sold, not by Normans, but by their own

country people, who had long carried it on before the Conquest. Lanfranc

persuaded William to abolish it, but the rude Saxon slave-merchants

cared nothing for his edicts, until the Bishop of Worcester came to

Bristol, and preached against the traffic, staying a month or two at

a time, every year, till the minds of the people of Bristol were so

altered, that they not only gave up the trade, but acquired such

a horror of it that they tore out the eyes of the last person who

persisted in it.

The favor and esteem with which Wulstan was regarded did not cease, but

he was obliged to spend a life of constraint. The Archbishop made him

keep a band of armed retainers to preserve the peace of the country, and

they were new and strange companions for the old monk; but as he thought

his presence kept them from evil, he did not remain aloof, dining with

them each day in the public hall, and even while they sat long over the

wine, remaining with them, pledging them good-humoredly in a little cup,

which he pretended to taste, and ruminating on the Psalms in the midst

of their noisy mirth.

Cameos from English History, from Rollo to Edward II · 第 6 / 44 段