The two friends stood looking together down the street, which, as the sun
descended, began to be deserted of its usual crowd. Their attention was
arrested by a numerous body of footmen, and other attendants, who were
escorting apparently some lady in a sedan chair. They were rather
surprised to observe that the sedan chair directed its course towards
their own house. A knocking at the door was heard; and soon after their
servant brought them word, that a certain Signora ---- desired urgently to
speak with Constantia, but that she could not quit her chair. The person
whose name was announced, was an old lady, one of Constantia's most
intimate friends; she descended immediately into the hall to meet her. She
precipitated herself towards the sedan chair, the door of which stood
open; a slight impulse from some bystander, from a hand which trembled as
it touched her, carried her forward, and she found herself seated in what
indeed was an empty chair. Before she had time to raise an alarm, she
found herself borne swiftly and softly along the street. Leonora, who had
followed her friend down the stairs, and was a witness to her singular
disappearance, called up all the servants of the establishment, and
despatched them after their mistress. They followed, but to no purpose.
The running footmen, on either side of the sedan, drew their swords. They
were students in disguise. Giacomo had succeeded in his daring enterprise.
Constantia had hardly collected her thoughts, when she perceived that her
chair was carried through a lofty archway up a broad flight of stairs, and
deposited in a spacious apartment, once the proud saloon of a palatial
residence, though the whole building, of which it formed a part, had since
been constituted a portion of the university. All her attendants except
one left the room. We need not say that it was Giacomo who handed her from
her temporary imprisonment.
To judge from their bearing and attitude, you would have said that it was
Giacomo who was the captive, bending before the mercy of Constantia. She
stood there, upright, calm, inflexible. He was, indeed, at her mercy. He
felt that his life depended on this present moment, and on the few words
that should fall from her lips. He led her to the upper end of the room
where his imagination had so often placed her. He knelt--he sued.
Beginning with abrupt protests and exclamations, his impassioned pleading
gradually grew more continuous, but not less vehement, till it flowed in
the full torrent of a lover's eloquence. On all this turbulent pathos
Constantia looked calmly down, more in sorrow than in anger. From the
moment she understood in whose power she was, she had ceased (so much
justice she had at least done to the character of her lover) to have any
alarm whatever on her own account; but she was filled with regret,
disquietude, and concern for the fatal consequences which might ensue to
himself from the unwarrantable step he had taken. "Restore me to my
uncle's before he shall hear of this," were the only words she vouchsafed
in return to all his passionate appeal.
But the pleading of the desperate lover was not, as may well be supposed,
allowed to proceed without interruption. Leonora, a young girl of spirit
and animation, immediately sent forth the servants of the household to
rouse up the friends of the family, and to spread every where the report
of the strange outrage which had been committed upon one of the most
respected families of Bologna. A fleet messenger was especially despatched
to the uncle of Constantia, distant only a few miles from the town, to
recall him to a scene where his presence was so much required. There was a
perpetual standing feud between the citizens of Bologna and the students
of the university, which had often disturbed the tranquillity of the city;
it was therefore with extreme alacrity and zeal that the townsmen rushed
in crowds into the streets, armed with the best weapons they could
procure, to rescue the niece of their venerable judge, and to punish the
gross outrage which they conceived had been perpetrated.
When, however, the multitude came in front of the large mansion or palace
in which Giacomo resided, and which was tenanted entirely by students, the
great majority of whom were his zealous partisans, and all of whom were
prepared, in any quarrel whatever, to take part against the townsmen, they
found the enterprise they had undertaken to be one of no little
difficulty. The huge gates were closed and barred, while the windows above
were occupied by a spirited garrison who had already supplied themselves
with missiles of every description to annoy their assailants. These latter
began, with true Italian energy, to pull up the posts out of the street,
to form battering-rams with which to force the gates. They thundered at
them with dreadful din, shaking the whole edifice; and in spite of the
missiles despatched in quick succession from above, seemed to be on the
point of effecting an entrance.
When Constantia heard this horrible din she turned pale with
affright--Giacomo pale with rage. He could make no impression on the cold
beauty before him--his suppressed passion was suffocating him. Against
_these_ assailants all his impetuosity could burst forth--_them_ he knew
at least how to defy;--here was an enemy he could vanquish, or, at worst,
a defeat he knew how to sustain. When, therefore, several of his friends
rushed breathless into the room to tell him that the great gates began to
creak upon their hinges, and were likely to be beaten in, he almost
welcomed this new species of contest. Conducting Constantia into a
side-room, where she would be out of reach of the ensuing tumult and
disorder, and where an aged matron waited to attend upon her, he went with
his friends to meet the rest of his companions in arms, who were anxious
to consult him on the next measures which in their present emergency
should be taken.
The house, or palazzo, was built on a plan very customary in such
structures. In the centre were the tall gates, now undergoing the battery
of the citizens, which opened upon a square, lofty, paved court or hall,
supported by columns, and forming a carriage-way up to the foot of the
staircase. Originally you passed through the hall into a garden beyond,
but when the building had been converted into a residence for students,
and made a part, in fact, of the university, a wall had been erected,
separating the garden from the house. This wall, though lofty, did not,
however, rise to the level of the roof of the hall; both light and air
were admitted from above it, and you still saw the topmost branches of the
orange-trees and the summits of the fountains that were playing in the
garden beyond. From either side of this hall rose the broad and marble
staircase which led into the interior of the house.
Upon both branches of this noble staircase, whose steps faced the
entrance, Giacomo stationed his gallant band, armed each of them at least
with his rapier. He then commissioned one of his companions to proclaim to
the besiegers from a window above, that if they would cease their
battering, and retreat a few paces from the gates, they should be opened
to them.
To this the crowd assented, presuming that it could imply nothing else
than a surrender. The great doors were opened. They rushed forward; but
the staircase they thought to ascend so readily was occupied every inch of
it by a brave phalanx, which awaited them with glittering swords, held
forward in spear fashion, tier above tier. The first rank of this
disordered multitude had no desire whatever to be thrust forward by those
in the rear on the points held forth by this determined phalanx. A great
number of them passed harmless between the two staircases, but the wall we
have described prevented any egress in that direction; and when the lower
part of the hall was quite full, the struggle commenced in earnest between
those of the crowd who desired to retreat, and those who, knowing nothing
of the peril of their companions, were still urging forward. The struggle
rose to a combat. The students, who, at the express desire of Giacomo,
stood steadily at their post, and preserved a dead silence, were
undisturbed spectators of the tumult, and saw their adversaries in
desperate strife, the one against the other.
They seemed to be on the point of obtaining, in this singular manner, a
bloodless victory, when Andrea, the uncle of Constantia, together with the
Podesta, made their appearance, with such military force as could be
assembled at the moment. This had immediately one good effect; the crowd
without, by making way for the Podesta, released their companions within,
still struggling for escape. The military force of the Podesta soon stood
confronted with the little band of students. Yet these were so well
placed, had so decidedly the advantage of position, and their leader was
so well known for his prowess and indomitable courage, that there was a
great unwillingness to commence the attack, and very loud calls were made
upon them to surrender to the majesty of the law.
For Giacomo, the combat was what his blood boiled for. Would that he could
have fought single-handed--he alone--and perilled, and have lost his life!
But when he saw the respected form of the uncle of Constantia--when he
reflected that the experiment he had so long desired, _had been made and
failed_--that the cold virgin whom he had left up stairs was still
invincible, whoever else he might conquer or resist, and that he should be
exposing the lives of his companions in a combat where to him there was
now no victory--he lowered his sword, and made treaty of peace with the
Podesta. On consideration that none other but himself should suffer any
species of penalty for that day's transaction, he offered to resign
Constantia to her uncle, and himself to the pleasure of the Podesta. These
terms were very readily accepted; his companions alone seemed reluctant to
acquiesce in them.
CHAPTER III.
While all this tumult was raging round the house, and within the heart of
Giacomo, the student's lamp was burning, how calm, how still, in the
remote and secluded chamber of his friend Petrarch! To him, out of a kind
and considerate regard, and from no distrust in his zeal or attachment,
the ardent lover had concealed his perilous enterprise. Remote from the
whole scene, and remote from all the passions of it, sat the youthful
sage; not remote, however, from deep excitements of his own. Far from it.
Reflection has her emotions thrilling as those of passion. He who has not
closed his door upon the world, and sat down with books and his own
thoughts in a solitude like this--may have lived, we care not in how gay a
world, or how passionate an existence,--he has yet an excitement to
experience, which, if not so violent, is far more prolonged, deeper, and
more sustained than any he has known,--than any which the most brilliant
scenes, or the most clamorous triumphs of life, can furnish. What is all
the sparkling exhilaration of society, the wittiest and the fairest,--what
all the throbbings and perturbations of love itself, compared with the
intense feeling of the _youthful thinker_, who has man, and God, and
eternity for his fresh contemplations,--who, for the first time, perceives
in his solitude all the grand enigmas of human existence lying unsolved
about him? His brow is not corrugated, his eye is not inflamed: he sits
calm and serene--a child would look into his face and be drawn near to
him--but it seems to him that on his beating heart the very hand of God is
lying.
The poet had closed his door, and unrolled before his solitary lamp his
favourite manuscript, "The Tusculan Disputations of Cicero." How well that
solitary lamp burning on so vivid and so noiseless--the only thing there
in motion, but whose very motion makes the stillness more evident, the
calm more felt; how well that lamp--the very soul, as it seems, of the
little chamber it illumines--harmonises with the student's mood! How it
makes bright the solitude around him! How it brings sense of companionship
and of life where nothing but it--and thought--are stirring!
But though the young student had seated himself to his intellectual feast,
it was evident that he was not quite at his ease; there was something
which occasioned him a slight disquietude. In truth he was destined, by
his father, to be "learned in the law;" was enjoying a stolen fruit; and
whatever the well-known proverb may say, we have never found, ourselves,
that any enjoyment is heightened by a sense of insecurity in its
possession, or a thought of the possible penalty which may be the
consequence of its indulgence. Petrarch might have been observed to listen
attentively to every footstep on the great staircase that served the whole
wing of the building to which his little turret belonged; and till the
step was lost, or he was sure that it had stopped at some lower stage in
the house, he suspended the perusal of his manuscript, and sat prepared to
drop the precious treasure into a chest that stood open at his feet, and
to replace it by an enormous volume of jurisprudence which lay ready at
hand for this piece of hypocritical service. This peculiarly nervous
condition was the result of a paternal visit which had been paid him, most
unexpectedly, a few evenings before. His father, suspecting that he was
more devoted to the classics than to the study of the law, started
suddenly from Avignon, stole upon his son unforewarned, ruthlessly
snatched from him the prized manuscripts in which he found him absorbed,
and committed them to the flames. Petrarch, of gentle temper, and full of
filial respect, ventured upon no resistance; but when he saw his Virgil
and his Cicero put upon his funeral pyre, he burst into a flood of
uncontrollable tears. His father, who was not himself without a love of
classic literature, but who was anxious for his son's advancement in the
world, and his study of a profession on which that advancement appeared
entirely to depend, was smit with compassion and some remorse. These last
two manuscripts he rescued himself from the flames, and restored to his
disconsolate son, with the repeated admonition, however, to indulge less
in their perusal, nor to allow them to take the place due to the science
of jurisprudence.
"Science!" said the young enthusiast, who had recovered something of his
self-possession: "Can conclusions wrested often with perverted ingenuity
from artificial principles and arbitrary axioms, be honoured with the name
of science? And the law, to obtain this fictitious resemblance to a
science, leaves justice behind and unthought of. I will study it, my
father, as I would practise any mechanical art, if you should prescribe it
as a means of being serviceable to my family; but you--who are a
scholar--ah! place not a tissue of technicalities, however skilfully
interwoven, on a level with truth, which has its basis in the nature of
things. I would help my fellow-men to justice; but must I spend my life,
and dry up and impoverish my very soul, in regulating his disputes
according to rules that are something very different from justice?--often
mere logical deductions from certain legal abstractions, in which all
moral right and wrong,--all substantial justice between man and man, is
utterly forgotten?"
"My son," said the father, "you are young, and therefore rash. You think
it, perhaps, an easy thing to do justice between man and man. _We cannot
do justice between man and man._ No combination of honesty and
intelligence can effect it; the whole compass of society affords no means
for its accomplishment. To administer moral justice, each case must be
decided on its own peculiar merits, and those merits are to be found in
the motives of the human heart. We cannot promise men justice. But we must
terminate their disputes. Therefore it is we have a system of law--our
only substitute for justice--by which men are contented to be governed
because it _is_ a system, and applicable to all alike. Believe me, that
wise and able men of all countries are well occupied in rendering more
symmetrical, more imposing, and as little immoral and unjust as possible,
their several systems of jurisprudence."
Petrarch was silent; it was neither his wish nor his policy to prolong the
discussion. Besides, his heart was too full. Had he dared, he would have
pleaded for his own liberty; for choice of poverty and intellectual
freedom--for poverty and greatness! But what he felt within him of the
promptings of ambition, the assurance of fame, the consciousness of
genius, he had too much modesty to express. He could not do justice to
himself, without appearance of overweening pride. It was better to be
silent than to say but half.
It was the remembrance of this visit which, on the present occasion, made
him listen with a painful curiosity to every step upon the stairs. And now
a step _was_ heard. It came nearer and nearer, higher and higher--a rapid
step which never paused an instant till it reached his own door. A loud
knocking followed. But this time it was no spy upon his literary hours.
On opening the door, a fellow-student, breathless with haste, rushed into
the room, and related the tragical event which had taken place at the
house of their common friend Giacomo.
Petrarch immediately descended and ran to meet his friend. He found him
already a prisoner! The Podesta, willing, however, to treat the unhappy
student with as much lenity as possible, had converted his own apartments
into his prison. He well knew, also, the honourable character of his
prisoner; the granting this indulgence enabled him to exact his word of
honour not to escape, and he probably judged, considering the extreme
popularity of Giacomo in the university, that this was a greater security
for his safe custody than any walls, or any guard, which he had at his
command in Bologna.
Petrarch was horror-struck when he came fully to apprehend the extreme
peril to which his friend had exposed himself. Whatever were his motives,
he had committed, in fact, a capital offence, and one to be classed
amongst the most heinous; it was the crime of abduction he had
perpetrated, and for which he stood exposed to the penalty of death. The
poet fell weeping into the arms of his friend.
"Alas!" said Giacomo, "she would not hear me!" The inflexibility of
Constantia was still the only grief that dwelt upon his mind. "She stood
there--on that spot--I could kiss the traces of her footstep could I see
them--cold, cold as the statue--I might have prayed with better hope to
the sculptured marble!"
But Petrarch did not limit his kind offices to sympathy and lamentation.
Meditative as he was by character, and little habituated to what is called
the business of life, he saw clearly the grave nature of his friend's
position. The crime which Giacomo had actually committed--the abduction
from her home of a noble virgin--subjected him, as we have said, to the
punishment of death. Those only who could have read his heart, or knew the
purity of his intentions, could have acquitted him; and even to those, his
conduct would have appeared rash and unjustifiable. But to the citizens of
Bologna, irritated and all but at war with the university, disposed to
magnify every offence committed by a member of that body, and exasperated,
moreover, by the late fruitless contest in which they had been
engaged--the act of Giacomo would appear in all its unmitigated
criminality. They were, in fact, resolved that he should not escape the
utmost rigour of the law; they were already clamouring aloud for his
death--his public execution.
There was but one man in Bologna who could save him. This was Romeo de'
Pepoli, a man exceedingly rich--by far the richest in the city--and who,
by a popular use of his wealth, had obtained a great ascendency in the
republic. This Romeo de' Pepoli was secretly aiming at the tyranny. He
failed, owing to the awakened jealousy of the people; but although he
himself was banished from the city at the very moment when he seemed about
to reap the fruits of his nefarious intrigues, he prepared the way to
power for his sons, who were for some time tyrants of Bologna. There was
no doubt that this man--and he alone--was able, if he chose, to rescue
Giacomo from his threatened fate. For should his influence with the
citizens fail to mitigate their animosity, still, in all the ill-assured
governments of that day, such exorbitant wealth as he possessed gave
something more than influence. Judgments of law were almost always to be
bought, if a price high enough could be paid, or an armed force could be
hired which would set the judgment of a court at defiance, and prevent its
execution.
To this eminent citizen and nobleman Petrarch betook himself. So
remarkable an event as that which had lately transpired in the city, we
may be sure, had drawn the attention of this wily and ambitious personage.
At first he had adopted the indignation and anger of the citizens, as
being the part most likely to increase his popularity. But on reflection
it had occurred to him, that a still greater advantage might perhaps be
taken of this event, if, through his skilful mediation, and a dexterous
advocacy of the cause of Giacomo, he should be able to obtain the favour
and partisanship of the more spirited members of the university. Over
these, no one had so great an influence as Giacomo--in the cause of no
one could they be more deeply interested--nor was it likely that, an
occasion would arise in which he could serve them more signally than by
coming to his rescue. On the other hand, a thousand ways would still be
open to appease and conciliate the offended citizens. Add to all which,
Giacomo himself, like all those on whom classical literature and the early
histories of Rome and of Greece were just re-opening, was distinguished by
an ardent zeal for liberty. Without seeking actually to intermeddle in the
political affairs of the city, he and his associates were
accustomed--probably in much the same manner as the German students of the
present day--to proclaim and uphold the cause of freedom in their songs,
and with the oratory of the wine-cup. They might be calculated on as
stanch friends to the republic, and deadly opponents to the tyranny. To
gain over this band of ardent and enthusiastic spirits, would be a great
step in the prosecution of his ambitious enterprise. Even their neutrality
would be an incalculable advantage to him.
Petrarch had been always well received by one who was anxious to win all
sorts of golden opinions, and therefore desirous to be thought an admirer
of learning and a patron of youthful genius. On the present occasion, he
found the ambitious nobleman singularly courteous, and not indisposed to
listen to his ardent vindication of Giacomo. With the usual artifice of
such men, Pepoli appeared to be listening to the reasoning of the young
advocate, whilst he was revolving only his own thoughts, and was not
unwilling to let it appear that predeterminations of his own were the
results of another's eloquence.
"Let me see your unfortunate friend," he said, with a sort of relenting
air; "something, perhaps, maybe done--I cannot tell. But you see the whole
town is in arms against him. I shall be risking," he added with a
smile,--for there is nothing more common with crafty men than to speak the
very truth in a light jesting manner, giving their earnest motives the air
of sport, and so expressing and disguising themselves at the same time--"I
shall be risking all my popularity with the good Bolognese--I must proceed
cautiously."
Petrarch ran back, full of sanguine hope, to his friend, and repeated the
result of his mission. Giacomo shook his head mournfully. He was slow to
enter into the exhilarating prospects placed before him. Perhaps he had
read deeper into the character of this man than Petrarch.
The interview which Pepoli desired took place. What circuitous terms the
ambitious man employed to suggest the price which was to be paid for his
intermediation, we do not know; but the smile on the lip of Giacomo was
interpreted as the smile of intelligence and acquiescence. Of intelligence
it certainly was. At this interview it was agreed that the student should
assemble together some of the most ardent and influential of his friends,
that he should present Pepoli to them, and induce them to swear a sort of
allegiance and fidelity to his cause, in return for the aid he pledged
himself to bring to Giacomo.
With the liberty allowed by the Podesta to his prisoner, it was not
difficult to arrange this meeting. He was permitted to invite to supper a
considerable number of his most faithful adherents and intimate
associates. It being understood that Pepoli was to be one of the guests,
there was still less scruple in granting this permission.
The supper passed off, as may be supposed under such circumstances, with
little hilarity. Being brought to a conclusion, Giacomo, at whose side sat
Pepoli, entreated the attention of his guests. He rose and addressed them.
He began by proclaiming the intended mediation of Pepoli in his behalf.
Cheers followed this announcement. He proceeded to enlarge on the wealth,
the power, the manifest pre-eminence in the state which Pepoli had
acquired. The students still applauded, but the exact drift of these
somewhat ambiguous praises--ambiguous in the mouth of a republican
speaking of a republican--they could not well perceive. Pepoli alone
seemed to understand and to approve. He then solemnly called upon his
friends to take an oath with him before he died.
"But you shall not die!" was the exclamation with which both Pepoli and
the students interrupted him.
"An oath," he continued, not heeding this interruption, "which I exact
from you in the name of friendship, in the name of virtue, in the name of
liberty. Is it not generous, this offer of Pepoli--of him who has been the
champion of the citizen against the student--the most popular man in all
Bologna,--is it not generous that he should step forward to rescue my life
from the blind rage and mad injustice of the multitude? But you must
understand there is a certain price to be given for this generosity. You
do not expect him to sacrifice his popularity, which is his power, out of
mere compassion to one who has never courted nor applauded him, without
receiving, in return, some compensation. If you accept his benefits, you
must forward his counsels, you must promote his designs. Say, will you
swear?"
"Yes! yes! we swear!" was the general response.
"Students of Bologna!" he proceeded, elevating his voice. "I accept this
mark of your friendship. For my sake you have promised to swear. Now hear
the oath I propose, and to which I bind you. This man offers me my life,
and the price of it is--the liberty of Bologna! Fellow students, Romeo de'
Pepoli aims at the tyranny. Swear that you will never, on any condition,
for any boon, aid him in his flagitious enterprise; that you will thwart,
and resist, and combat it to the utmost. Swear that you will, at all
times, reject his mediation--as I now reject, utterly and with scorn, the
service that he proffers me. I unmask him to you ere I die. I, too, have
lived for one good purpose. This man, my friends, would be tyrant of
Bologna--swear, to me that he shall _not_!"
There was a pause of a few seconds. But it was soon evident that the noble
spirit--of patriotism and of self-sacrifice--of their admired friend, had
found a genuine response in all his hearers. He had touched the true
chord. Carried forward by his disinterested enthusiasm, and pledged by the
promise he, had somewhat artfully extorted from them, they rose, and with
one voice repeated the oath proposed to, them. Pepoli, pale and aghast,
and utterly confounded, and catching here and there the flashing of the
half-drawn steel, made a precipitate retreat. Of all the assembly,
Petrarch alone remained silent--he alone failed, or forgot, to take the
oath;--full of concern for the safety of his noble friend, full of
admiration for his greatness, he fell weeping upon his neck.
CONCLUSION.
After this, there was no more hope for the prisoner. If to the anger of
the Bolognese was added the determined enmity of Romeo de' Pepoli, now
resolved on his destruction, from what quarter could a ray of hope
proceed? He was even now removed--such was the influence which the new
enemy he had provoked possessed over the Podesta--to the common prison,
and treated in all respects like a condemned malefactor. The university
pleaded its privilege to judge a member of their own body, but the angry
feeling of the citizens would not permit them for a moment to listen to
this plea. There, was no power on earth to save him--and his fault was so
light! A man more honourable did not exist. The purity of Constantia was
more safe in his hands than in any others--he loved her so well.
We are not sufficiently in the "tragic vein" to follow the prisoner
through the last hours of his confinement, and of his existence. To be
struck dead in the flush of life, with all his passions in full bloom upon
him, was a hard decree. Sometimes he protested vehemently against the
palpable injustice and cruelty of his sentence; but, in general, he found
his consolation in the mournful sentiment, that had he lived, he should
have been miserable--for the great desire of his life was doomed to be
thwarted. "I told you," he said one day to his friend Petrarch, "that
this love would work my destruction. It has so; but its great misery has
made destruction itself indifferent."
We willingly draw a veil over the last fatal scene, and all the horrors
that precede a public death. Throughout this scene his courage never
forsook him; but flashes of uncontrollable indignation would occasionally
break from him, and occasionally a sigh of more tender despondency would
escape. The last tear he shed, the last complaint he murmured, was still
to the coldness of Constantia: "We should have been so happy, had she
loved--and now!--"
History records that the execution of Giacomo, as well by infringing the
supposed privileges of the university as by the indignation it excited in
the large circle of his friends and companions, nearly led to the
withdrawal of the university from the town of Bologna. The students and
the professors seceded in a mass, and retired to Sienna. No entreaties
could bring them back; the glory of Bologna might have been extinguished
for ever. The Podesta and other magistrates of the town were compelled at
length to send a solemn deputation. They promised, in future, to respect
their privileges; and, by raising the salaries of the professors, and some
other popular measures, they eventually prevailed upon them to return.
Petrarch had not left the city with the rest--he had lingered behind to
perform the last rites and honours to the remains of Giacomo--to raise the
tomb and inscribe it with his verse.
Upon that tomb the solitary moon was now shining. But who was that figure
robed in deepest black that knelt beside it, so sadly, with so desponding
a stillness, her forehead pressed against the marble? Was it, too, marble?
No. The chisel may create beauty as exquisite, but never combine it with
so great a sorrow. It was Constantia. Too late! Too late! She brought her
tears where one smile would have given life and happiness. She felt the
worth of him who had so passionately loved her, when nothing remained to
love but the ashes in that urn. That pleading in the student's chamber
seemed vain--and at the moment it _was_ vain; but when she recalled it in
her own solitude, her heart had half assented. She remembered how
tenderly--with what an ardent and gentle worship--he had pressed her hand;
her own hand trembled then to the touch which at the time it had coldly
rejected. When, moreover, she heard, through their common friend Petrarch,
of the noble manner in which he had refused the aid of Pepoli, and chose
death rather than the least dishonour, and thought to herself--this man
loved me!--all her heart was won. Alas! too late!
She now knelt at the tomb of Giacomo, afflicted with regret that amounted
to remorse. She raised her head--she raised her hand--there was that
within it which glittered in the moonbeam. But her hand was suddenly
arrested. Petrarch, a frequent visitor at that tomb, had seen and
prevented this movement of despair. "No! no!" he cried. "Beautiful
creature, and too much beloved--live on--live! And when some other Giacomo
appears, make compensation to heaven--by loving him!"
HENRY IV.[18]
So closely united are the arts of history and romance, that they may
almost be said to be twin sisters. In both, the subjects are the same: and
the objects which the artists have in view in handling them are identical.
To impress the mind by the narrative of heroic, or melt it by that of
tragic events--to delineate the varieties of character, incident, and
catastrophes--to unfold the secret springs which influence the most
important changes, and often confound the wisest anticipations--to trace
the chain of causes and effects in human transactions from their
unobserved origin to their ultimate results, is equally the object of both
arts. The delineation of character, passion, and transaction is the great
end of both, but to neither is the subordinate aid of description or
pictorial embellishment denied. On the contrary, to both they constitute
one of the principal charms of this art. The sphere of description is
different, but the object and the impressions are the same. The novelist
paints individual places, and strives to transfer to the mind of the
reader a reflection of the brilliant scenes created in his own
imagination. The historian embraces a wider sphere, and aims rather at
portraying the general features of whole districts of country, or even
quarters of the globe. But a painter's eye, a poet's mind, are equally
required by both; and not the least interesting parts of the works of
either are those in which the author leaves the busy and checkered scenes
of dramatic incident, to dwell amidst the recesses of inanimate
beauty,--to traverse the Alps with their shepherds, or the Pampas with
their Gauchos, and mingle with the turbid course of human events somewhat
of the purity which breathes amidst the works of Nature.
Notwithstanding this identity of object and art, there is nothing more
certain than that romance writers in general have not made the best
historians. Poets also, whose art so closely resembles that of the
novelist, have in general failed when they invoked the historic muse.
Smollett was in many respects an admirable romance writer; but the author
of "Roderick Random" has left a History of England, which is nothing but a
compilation of parliamentary debates and gazettes. Scott's powers as a
romance writer were so great and various, and his delineations of historic
scenes, characters, and events, so graphic and powerful, that it seemed
next to impossible that he should not be equally successful as a
historian, especially when the theme was one so varied and animating as
the "Life of Napoleon." Voltaire's genius was universal, and seemed
equally adapted to every object of human pursuit; but his historical
works, though deservedly popular as school books, have never risen to an
eminence approaching that justly attained by his tragedies and critical
disquisitions.
What is very remarkable, and is just the reverse of what might _a priori_
have been expected, the point in which romance writers in general fail,
when they undertake history, is in giving sufficient life and animation to
their narrative. Like race-horses, they seem in general incapable of
carrying any considerable weight. They would break down under the panoply
which a steed of Norman or Flemish extraction can sustain without
difficulty. Their imagination is only kindled when it is at liberty to
roam at will over a world of their own creation. Confined to the narration
of actual events, limited to the delineation of real character, cramped by
the description of actual scenes, their powers fail, their ardour is
weakened, their fire is lost. A mind comparatively prosaic, subject to
such burdens, speedily out-strips them even on their own element; and the
scholar with his authorities kindles the imagination to an extent which
the poet with his verses can hardly excel. Witness Livy's pictured
pages--Gibbon's historical descriptions. Yet minds of the most elevated
cast have occasionally, though at long intervals from each other,
succeeded in uniting the historic and romantic arts. Homer's Iliad is the
annals of the Siege of Troy in verse; his Odyssey, the versified Travels
of Ulysses; and in the recent "Histoire des Girondins" by Lamartine, we
have convincing proof that it is possible to unite the most ardent and
enthusiastic poetical mind with the research, knowledge of character, and
dramatic power, requisite to make the most interesting tragic annals.
As a romance writer, Mr James unquestionably is entitled to a high place.
He has great historical information, especially of the olden times and
their leading characters; an accurate personal knowledge of various
countries, more particularly France, Flanders, and England; great
acquaintance with the dress, manners, arms, and accoutrements of former
days; and a very remarkable power of describing as well the ever-changing
events of ancient story as the varied scenes of inanimate nature. His best
novels, "Attila," "Philip Augustus," "Mary of Burgundy," "The Robbers,"
"The Smugglers," "Morley Ernstein," "Henry Masterton," are happy specimens
of the historical romance. The great and deserved success which has
attended the uniform edition of his novels now in course of publication,
sufficiently proves that his reputation rests on a broader and securer
basis than the fleeting patronage of fashion or the transient interest of
individual satire. The great risk which he runs, is from the _number_ of
his works. It is dangerous to write thirty books. The most prolific
imagination runs into repetition, when repeatedly tasked with invention.
Homer himself could not have written twenty Iliads; Shakspeare's fame has
been not a little enhanced by his having left only twenty-seven plays;
that of Sophocles, by only seven of his having come down to modern times.
Perhaps the best thing that a good fairy could do for James's fame--as was
said of Dryden--would be to withdraw two-thirds of his productions from
subsequent times.
One of the greatest charms of Mr James's writings is the beautiful ideas,
clothed in felicitous language, which are to be found profusely scattered
over them. It is not the general opinion that he excels in this respect;
on the contrary, nothing is more common in conversation than to hear it
remarked, that it is in depth of thought, and knowledge of the human
heart, that he is deficient. But this opinion arises from the frequency,
sometimes, perhaps, redundancy of his pictures of nature, and the
brilliant colours in which he never fails to array her finest scenes.
Thoughts the most beautiful are frequently concealed amidst profusion of
description, as fruit sometimes amidst luxuriance of leaves. Take for
example the following, on one of the most familiar objects in nature--a
drop of rain.
"We spoke of the rain, and I foolishly enough, in mentioning all the
annoyance it had occasioned me, loaded it with maledictions.
"'Call it not accursed, my son,' said the monk. 'Oh no! remember that
every drop that falls, bears into the bosom of the earth a quality of
beautiful fertility. Remember that glorious tree, and herb, and
shrub, and flower, owes to those drops its life, its freshness, and
its beauty. Remember that half the loveliness of the green world is
all their gift; and that, without them, we should wander through a
dull desert, as dusty as the grave. Take but a single drop of rain
cloistered in the green fold of a blade of grass, and pour upon it
one ray of the morning sun, where will you get lapidary, with his
utmost skill, to cut a diamond that shall shine like that? Oh no!
blessed for ever be the beautiful drops of the sky, the refreshing
soothers of the seared earth--the nourishers of the flowers--that
calm race of beings, which are all loveliness and tranquillity,
without passion, or pain, or desire, or disappointment--whose life is
beauty, and whose breath is perfume."--_Henry Masterton._
Mr James cannot be considered as a historical writer of the highest class.
He gives a spirited and agreeable narrative of the events of the reign or
period which he has undertaken to describe, and in many passages the
descriptive powers of the romance writer are strikingly conspicuous. He
is diligent and worthy in the consultation of authorities, and free from
any undue bias in the drawing of characters or narrative of events. But he
has neither the philosophic glance of Guizot, nor the military fire of
Napier, nor the incomparable descriptive powers of Gibbon. His merit, and
it is a very great one, consists in the lucid and spirited telling of the
story, interspersed with interesting descriptions of the scenes of the
leading incidents, and dramatic portraiture of the principal characters.
His greatest fault--no trifling one--is the perplexity produced in the
mind of the reader by the want of proper grouping and arrangement, and the
introduction of a vast number of characters and events at once into the
story, without any preparatory description, to enable him to appreciate
the one or understand the other. This is a very natural error for a
romance writer to fall into when he undertakes history; because, in
novels, where characters are few, and the events only such as happen to
them, there is no need of previous preparation of the reader's mind, of
such grouping and perspective, for the simplification and illustration of
events. But, in history, where the events are so numerous and complicated,
and each actor in general occupies only an inconsiderable portion of the
canvass, it is indispensable, if the writer would avoid prolixity of
details, or achieve that object so well known to artists, which they
denominate _breadth_ of effect.
Biography should be, and when properly handled is, the most interesting
branch of historical composition. It has the immense advantage--the value
of which can only be properly appreciated by those who undertake to write
general history--of being limited to the leading characters who have
appeared on the theatre of the world, and consequently steering clear of
the intermediate periods of uninteresting or tedious occurrence. How to
get over these without exhausting the patience of his readers, on the one
hand, or incurring the reproach of omitting some events of importance, on
the other, is the great difficulty of general history. The biographer
seizes the finest points of the story; he dwells only on the exploits of
his hero, and casts the rest into the shade. If this style of composition
does not afford room for those general and important views on the general
march of events, or progress of our species, which constitute the most
valuable part of the highest branch of history, it presents much greater
opportunities for securing the interest of the general reader, and
awakening that sympathy in the breast of others, which it is the great
object of the fine arts to produce. It has one immense advantage--it
possesses unity of subject, it is characterised by singleness of interest.
The virtues or vices, the triumphs or misfortunes, the glories or ruin of
one individual, form the main subject of the narrative. It is on them that
the attention of the writer is fixed; it is to enhance their interest that
his efforts are exhausted. The actions of others, the surrounding events,
only require to be displayed in so far as they bear upon, or are connected
with the exploits of the hero. But as great men usually appear in, or
create by their single efforts, important eras in the annals of mankind,
it rarely happens that the characters selected for biography are not
surrounded by a cluster of others, which renders their Lives almost a
general history of the period during which they communicated their impress
to the events of the world; and thus their biography combines unity of
interest with the highest importance in event.
This was pre-eminently the case with the history of Henry IV. of France.
So important, indeed, were the events crowded into his lifetime, so great
and lasting have been the consequences of his triumph, so prodigious the
impulse which his genius communicated, not only to his own country, but to
Europe, that he may almost be said to have created an era in modern times.
The first of the Bourbon family, he was, in truth, the founder of the
French monarchy, in one sense of the term. He first gave it unity,
consistence, and power; he first rendered it formidable to the liberties
of Europe. Before his time, during the reigns of the princes of the House
of Valois, it was rather a cluster of separate and almost independent
feudatories, than a compact and homogeneous empire. So powerful were these
great vassals, so slender the force which the crown could command to
control them, that France on many occasions made the narrowest possible
escape from sharing the fate of Germany, and seeing in its chief
nobles--the Dukes of Burgundy and Brittany, the Counts of
Toulouse--independent monarchs rendering, like the electors of
Brandenberg, Saxony, and Bavaria, only a nominal allegiance to their
feudal superior. The religious wars, which broke out with the Reformation,
still farther increased the divisions, and severed the ties of this
distracted kingdom.
The contest of the rural nobility of the south, attached to the new
opinions as fervently as the Scottish Covenanters, with the more numerous
and concentrated Roman Catholics of the north, who clung with
superstitious tenacity to the pomp and ceremonies of the ancient worship,
continued through several successive generations, not only drenched the
kingdom with blood, but altered the character, and obliterated the virtues
of its inhabitants. Revenge became the only passion that retained its sway
over the human heart; cruelty so common, that its atrocity was no longer
perceived. The massacre of St Bartholomew, that lasting and indelible
stain on ancient, as the massacre in the prisons, and the Reign of Terror,
are on modern French history, is not to be regarded as the work of a
blood-thirsty tyrant, aided by a corrupt and perfidious court. The public
crimes of the rulers of men never can exceed, except by a few degrees,
those for which the nation is prepared. It is the frenzy of the general
mind which suggests and renders practicable the atrocious deeds, by which,
happily at long intervals from each other, the annals of mankind are
stained. The proscriptions of the Triumvirate, the alternate slaughters of
Marius and Sylla, the massacre of St Bartholomew, the _auto-da-fes_ of
Castile, the reign of the Duke of Alva in Flanders, the butchery of the
wars of the Roses in England, the blood shed by Robespierre in France, all
proceeded from a frenzied state of the public mind, which made the great
body of the people not only noways revolt at, but cordially support those
savage deeds, at which, when recounted in the pages of history, all
subsequent ages shudder. Even the massacre of St Bartholomew, perhaps the
most atrocious, because the most cold-blooded and perfidious, of all those
horrid deeds, excited at the time no feeling of indignation in the Roman
Catholic party throughout Europe. On the Contrary, it was universally and
cordially approved of by those of that persuasion in every country, as a
most effectual and expedient, and withal justifiable way of lopping off a
gangrened arm from the body politic, and extinguishing a pestilent heresy.
The discharges of the cannon from the castle of St Angelo, and the _Te
Deum_ sung in St Peter's, on the arrival of the glorious intelligence, by
the Head of the faithful at Rome, were re-echoed by the
acclamation--without, so far as appears, a single exception--of the whole
Romish world.[19]
It was the cessation of the hideous scenes of bloodshed and massacre which
had signalised the civil wars in the reigns of the Valois princes, and the
religious dissensions that succeeded them, which gave Henry IV. his great
and deserved reputation. Like Napoleon, he calmed, by his acquisition of
the throne, the passions of a nation in arms against itself. The
hereditary feuds, the dreadful retaliations, the mutual proscriptions, the
fierce passions, the frightful revenge of the feudal and Huguenot wars,
were stilled as if by the wand of a mighty enchanter.
Henry IV. was the man of his age; and hence it was that he achieved this
prodigy. His mental and physical qualities were precisely those which his
time demanded; and it was this combination which enabled him to achieve
his astonishing success. Bold, active, and enterprising, he presented that
mixture of warlike virtues with chivalrous graces which it is the great
object of romance to portray, and which may be said to form the ideal of
the European character. He possessed that individual gallantry, that
personal daring, that spontaneous generosity, which, even more than
commanding intellectual qualities, succeed in winning the hearts of
mankind. Ever the foremost in attack, the last in retreat, he excelled his
boldest knights in personal courage. The battle-field was to him a scene
of exultation. He had the true heroic character. Like the youth in
Tacitus, he loved danger itself, not the rewards of valour. Nor were the
mental qualities and combinations requisite in the general awanting. On
the contrary, he possessed them in the very highest degree. Active,
enterprising, indefatigable, he was ever in the field with the advanced
guard, and often ran the greatest personal danger from his anxiety to see
with his own eyes the position or forces of the enemy. His skill in
partisan strife, on which so much of success in war then depended--in the
surprise of castles, the siege of towns, the capture of convoys, the
sudden irruption into territories, equalled all that poetry had conceived
of the marvellous. His deeds, as narrated by the cool pen of Sully,
resemble rather the fabulous exploits of knight-errantry than the events
of real life. It was thus, by slow degrees and painful efforts, that he
gradually brought up his inconsiderable party, at first not a fourth part
of the forces of the League, to something like a level with his formidable
opponents; and at length was enabled to rout them in decisive battles, and
establish his fortunes on a permanent foundation in the fields of Arques
and Ivry.
The contest at first appeared to be so unequal as to be altogether
hopeless. Though the undoubted heir to the crown, his forces, when the
succession opened to him by the assassination of Henry III., were so
inconsiderable compared to those of the League, that it seemed impossible
that he could fight his way to the throne. The Huguenots were only two
millions of souls, and the Roman Catholics were eighteen millions. The
latter were in possession of the capital, wielded the resources of its
rich and ardent population, and had all the principal towns and
strongholds of the kingdom in their hands. It was in the distant
provinces, especially of the south, that the strength of the Protestants
lay: their forces were the lances of the rural nobility, and the stout
arms of the peasants in Dauphiny, the Cevennes, and around La Rochelle.
But all history, and especially that of France, demonstrates how
inadequate in general are the resources of remote and far-severed
provinces to maintain a protracted contest with an enemy in possession of
the capital, the fortresses, and ruling the standing army of the kingdom.
The forces of the Catholics in this instance were the more formidable,
that they were warlike and experienced, trained to the practical duties of
soldiers in previous civil wars, united in a league which, like the Solemn
League and Covenant in Scotland, formed an unseen bond uniting together
the most distant parts of the monarchy, and directed by the Duke of Guise,
a leader second to none in capacity and daring, and equal to any in
ruthless energy and unscrupulous wickedness.
It was the personal qualities, heroic spirit, and individual talents of
the King which enabled him to triumph over this formidable combination.
Never was evinced in a more striking light the influence of individual
gallantry and conduct on national fortunes; or a more convincing
illustration of the undoubted truth, that when important changes are about
to be made in human affairs, Providence frequently makes use of the agency
of individual greatness. But for Henry's capacity and determination, the
Protestants would have been crushed, and the civil war terminated in the
first campaign. But, like all other illustrious men, he became great in
the school of adversity. His energy, resources, and perseverance triumphed
over every difficulty, extricated him from every peril, and at length
enabled him to triumph over every opposition. It was his wonderful
partisan qualities--the secrecy, skill, and daring of his enterprises,
which first laid the foundation of his fortune, by drawing to his standard
many of those restless spirits, let loose over the country by the former
wars, who in every age are attracted by the courage, capacity, and
liberality of a leader. He was thus enabled to augment the little army of
the Huguenots by a considerable accession of bold and valuable soldiers
from the opposite faith, but who cared more for the capacity of their
leader than for either the psalms of the Huguenots or the high mass of the
Catholics.
By degrees, many even of the Romish nobility, penetrated with admiration
at the manner in which the heir of the crown combated for his rights,
joined his standard, in the secret hope that when he came to the throne he
would revert to the faith of the majority of his subjects. He won all
hearts, even in the enemy's ranks, by his generosity, humanity, and heroic
spirit. The soldiers worshipped the hero who shared all their hardships,
and whose greatest pleasure was ever to be the first in advancing into the
enemy's fire; the officers were filled with enthusiasm for the prince who
treated them all with the hearty courtesy of the camp, and claimed no
distinction save that which all felt to be due to pre-eminent valour and
never-failing capacity. Even his weaknesses augmented the general interest
in his character; and when it was known that the leader whose exploits
riveted the attention of all Europe, not unfrequently stole from the
council-board or the tent to pursue some fugitive fair one through a
forest, or subdue the obduracy of high-born beauty, by watching all night
before her castle walls, the age of romance seemed to have returned to the
earth, and all hearts were interested in the hero who appeared to unite
the greatness of ancient patriotism with the spirit of modern chivalry.
Nor did Henry's conduct, when he had taken Paris and conquered the throne,
belie the expectations formed by this brilliant dawn of his career. He
proved not merely a warrior, but the father of his people. Great projects
of amelioration were set on foot--greater still were in preparation, when
he perished by the hand of Ravaillac. His celebrated saying, that he
"hoped to see the time when every peasant should have his fowl in his
pot," reveals the paternal spirit of his government. It is vain to say
these were the acts of his ministers; that Sully was the real sovereign.
The answer of Queen Elizabeth, when the success of her reign was imputed
to the capacity of her ministers, "Did you ever know a fool choose a wise
one?" affords the decisive reply to all such depreciatory attempts. Under
his beneficent rule, industry was protected, commerce revived; canals,
roads, and bridges penetrated the country in every direction; and, most
marvellous of all, religious schisms were healed and religious fury
stilled. The abjuration by the successful monarch of the faith in which he
had been bred, and the warriors of which had combated for him, was
unquestionably a measure called for, in a temporal view, by the interest
of his dominions at the time, not less than by his own tenure of the
throne. When it is recollected that the Huguenots did not at that period
exceed two millions, among twenty which France contained, it becomes at
once apparent, that, in a country so recently convulsed by the passions of
religious and civil dissension, conformity with the faith of the great
majority was the sole condition on which tranquillity could have been
restored, discord appeased, a stable government established, or the crown
transmitted to the descendants of the reigning monarch. And, while his
biographer must lament the necessity to which he was subjected, of bending
religious conviction to political expedience, all must admire the wisdom
of the Edict of Nantes, which, without shocking the prejudices of the
Catholics, secured liberty of conscience and just immunities to the
Protestants; and which, if adhered to by succeeding monarchs, on the
equitable spirit in which it had been conceived by its author, would
probably have left the direct heirs of Henry IV. still on the throne of
France, and averted all the bloodshed and horrors of the Revolution.
Henry IV., however, was not a perfect character; had he been so, he would
not have been a child of Adam. He had the usual proportion of the
weaknesses, some of the faults, of humanity. They were, for the most part,
however, of that kind which are nearly allied to virtues, and to which
heroic characters have, in every age, in a peculiar manner been subject.
Heroism, love, and poetry, ever have and ever will be found united: they
are, in truth, as Lamartine has expressed it, twin sisters of each other;
they issued at a single birth from the same parents. We may regret that it
is so; but if we do, we had better extend our regrets a little farther,
and lament that we are not all immaculate as our First Parents were in the
bowers of Paradise. His irregularities are universally known, and have,
perhaps, rendered him as celebrated in France as his warlike exploits or
pacific virtues; for they fell in with the prevailing passion of the
nation, and were felt by all to be some excuse for their own indulgences.
They are celebrated even in the well-known air which has become, in a
manner, the National Anthem:--
"Vive Henri IV.!
Vive le roi vaillant!
Ce Diable a quatre
A le triple talent
De boire et de battre,
Et d'etre vert galant."
Henry IV., however, had more apology than most men for these frailties. He
lived in an age, and had been bred up in a court, in which female virtue
was so rare that it had come to pass for a chimera, and licentious
indulgence so frequent that it had become a habit, and ceased to be a
subject of reproach. Naturally ardent, susceptible, and impetuous, he was
immersed in a society in which intrigue with high-born beauty was
universally considered as the great object and chief employment of life.
The poetry and romances which were in every hand inculcated nothing else.
His own Queen, Margaret of Valois, gave him the first example of such
irregularities, and while she set no bounds to her jealousy of his
mistresses, particularly La Belle Gabrielle, who so long held the monarch
captive, she had no hesitation in bestowing her own favours on successive
lovers with as little scruple as the King himself. In some instances,
however, he was more completely inexcusable. It is remarkable that the
attachments of Henry became more violent as he advanced in life, and had
attained the period when the passions are usually found to cool. In some
instances they impelled him into acts of vehemence and oppression wholly
unworthy of his character and heart. His passion, late in years, for the
young Princess of Conde--a child of seventeen, who might have been his
granddaughter--and which prompted her flight with her husband to the Low
Countries, on which he was preparing war for her recovery when cut short
by death, was ridiculous in one of his age, and grossly criminal to one in
her circumstances. But these passions pursued him to the very last; and
when his tomb was broken open, and remained exposed, by the Parisian mob
during the fury of the Revolution, the nicely combed and highly perfumed
beard, the scent of which filled the air, proved that the dagger of
Ravaillac had struck him while still immersed in the frivolities which
tarnished his heroic exploits.[20]
In truth, without detracting from the many great and good qualities of the
hero of the Bourbon family, it may safely be affirmed that his fame in
subsequent times has been to the full as great as he deserved. Many
circumstances have contributed to this happy partiality of subsequent
times. His reign was filled with great and glorious actions; and that
endeared him to the heroic and the brave. His court was the abode of
gallantry--his life devotion to beauty; and that won for him the applause
of the fair. He did wonders, and designed still greater, for the internal
improvement of his dominions and the increase of his people's happiness;
and that secured for him the approbation of the philanthropic and
thoughtful. He gained for the Protestants religious freedom and immunity
from persecution; and that secured their eternal gratitude. He restored
to the Church of Rome the religious supremacy which had been so fiercely
disputed, and in so many other countries had been lost; and that shut the
mouths of the Catholics. He stilled the fury of civil, and pacified the
fierceness of religious discord; and that justly won for him the gratitude
of all. His reign formed a bright contrast to the frightful civil wars and
universal bloodshed which had preceded it. Like Napoleon, he closed the
gulf of revolution; and the admiration of subsequent times was the worthy
meed of the inestimable service thus rendered to humanity. They have not
diminished, perhaps exaggerated, the tribute. He was the first of a race
of sovereigns who for two centuries sat in the direct line on the throne
of France, and the collateral descendants of whom still hold it. Family
partiality, courtly panegyric, thus came to be largely mingled with the
just tribute of a nation's gratitude. The writers of other countries,
particularly England and Germany, joined in the chorus of applause to the
prince who had secured to the Protestant faith its just rights in so
important a kingdom as France. The vices or weakness of subsequent
sovereigns--the feeble rule of Louis XIII.; the tyrannical conduct, the
splendid talents of Louis XIV.; the corruptions of the Regent Orleans; the
disgraceful sensuality of Louis XV.; the benevolent heart, but passive
resignation of Louis XVI.--rose up successively in striking contrast to
his heroic deeds, vigorous government, and equitable administration. But,
without disregarding the influence of these circumstances in brightening
the halo which still surrounds the memory of Henry IV., the sober voice of
distant and subsequent history must pronounce him one of the greatest
princes who have adorned modern history, and certainly the greatest, after
Charlemagne and Napoleon, who ever sat on the throne of France.
But it is time to put a period to this general disquisition, to give some
extracts from the work of our author, in justice both to its own merits
and the character of the hero which it is intended to portray.
Mr James gives the following interesting particulars concerning the birth
and early years of Henry:--
"The Duchess of Vendome was at this time with her husband in Picardy,
but at her father's summons she set out for the south of France in
the wintry month of November; and, displaying that hardy and vigorous
constitution which she transmitted to her son, she traversed the wide
extent of country which lay between the extreme frontier of France
and her father's territories in the short space of eighteen days,
arriving at Pau not quite a fortnight before the birth of her third
child. There is reason to believe that various motives, besides that
attachment to her parent which she had always displayed, induced
Jeanne d'Albret to undertake so long and fatiguing a journey at so
critical a period. Information had reached her, we find, that the
King of Navarre had fallen under the influence of a lady of Bearn,
who had employed her power over his mind, as is usual in such
connexions, to enrich herself; and also that the Prince, with
weakness not uncommon even in great men, had made a will in favour of
his mistress, which was likely to deprive his daughter and her
husband of a considerable portion of their expected inheritance. The
natural anxiety of Jeanne d'Albret to see this will was communicated
by some of the court to the old King, and he in reply assured her
that he would place it in her hands as soon as he beheld the child
she was about to bear, upon the condition that she should sing him a
song in the pains of labour: 'In order,' he said, 'that thou mayest
not give me a crying and a puny child.'
"The Duchess promised to perform the task, and at the moment of the
birth of her son, as soon as she heard her father's foot in the
chamber, she saluted him with one of the songs of her native country.
When the child was shown to him, Henry d'Albret took him joyfully in
his arms, and remembering the sneer of the Spaniards, he exclaimed,
as if with a foresight of what he would become, 'My sheep has borne
me a lion!' Then giving his will to his daughter, he continued;
'There, my child, that is for thee, but this is for me,'--and
carrying the boy, wrapped in a fold of his dressing gown, into his
own chamber, he rubbed his lips with a piece of garlic, and gave him
from his own golden cup some drops of wine.
"Whether the King of Navarre did or did not imagine, as has been
asserted, that such unusual treatment of a newborn infant would
ensure to his grandson a hardy and a vigorous constitution, it
certainly indicated the course of education which he wished to be
pursued; and nothing was left undone that could strengthen the
corporeal frame of the young prince, and prepare him for the
hardships and exertions of a military career. Though a strong and
powerful child, some difficulty was at first found in rearing him;
and, perhaps, too high a degree of anxiety in regard to his health,
caused the frequent change of nurses, which was of course detrimental
to the infant.
"Great rejoicings took place on the occasion of his baptism; and his
grandfather displayed all the splendour of the little court of
Navarre, which the Emperor Charles V. once declared, had received him
in his passage through France with greater magnificence than any
other court he had visited. His godfathers were Henry II. of France
and Henry d'Albret of Navarre; and the rite, which was performed
according to the usages of the Church of Rome, was administered by
the Cardinal of Armagnac, Vice-legate of Avignon.
"From the castle of Pau the prince was speedily removed to that of
Coarasse, situated nearly at the mouth of the beautiful valley of
Lourdes; and there, under the immediate superintendence of his
grandfather and a distant relation, Susannah de Bourbon, Baroness de
Miossens, commenced that hardy education which lasted till after the
death of the King of Navarre. That monarch, we are told by a
contemporary author, 'reproached his daughter and son-in-law with
having lost several of their children by French delicacies; and in
fact,' the same writer goes on to say, 'he brought up his grandson
after the fashion of Bearn, with naked feet and head, very often with
as little refinement as peasants' children are nurtured.' No rich
clothing, no playthings were given to him; and Henry d'Albret
especially commanded that he should neither be flattered nor treated
as a prince, but fed upon the ordinary diet of the country, and
dressed in the simplest manner. He was allowed to climb the rocks and
mountains, and try his limbs in robust exercises from the earliest
period of life; and all that could be done to invigorate mind or
body, appears to have been strictly attended to in his years of
infancy."
At a subsequent period, when he had attained the era, and was engaged in
the studies of youth, his character and pursuits are thus described.
"We learn that he was at this time a very lively, quick, and
beautiful boy, full of vigour and activity of mind and body, apt to
receive instruction, and giving every promise of attaining great
proficiency in letters. La Gaucherie took every pains to render the
study of the learned languages agreeable to him; not teaching him in
the ordinary method, by filling his mind with long and laborious
rules, difficult to remember, and still more difficult to apply, but
following more the common course by which we acquire our maternal
language; and storing his mind with a number of Greek and Latin
sentences, which the Prince afterwards wrote down and analysed. The
first work which he seems to have translated regularly was Caesar's
Commentaries; a version of several books of which was seen by the
biographer of the Duke of Nevers in his own handwriting; and his
familiarity with the Greek was frequently shown in the sports and
pastimes of the court where mottoes in the learned languages were
frequently required.
"It is customary for the historians and eulogists of great men to
point out, after their acts have rendered them famous those slight
indications which sometimes in youth give promise of future eminence;
and thus, we are told the favourite motto, of Henry in his boyhood
was, [Greek: e nikan e apothanein], to conquer or to die. The fact,
however, is worthy of remark, not so much perhaps because it showed
the boy's aspirations for military glory, as because his frequent use
of this sentence seems to have created some uneasiness in the mind of
Catherine de Medicis, who forbade his masters to teach him such
apophthegms for the future, saying that they were only calculated to
render him obstinate.
"It is not probable that the Queen-mother would have taken notice of
such a sentence on the lips of any ordinary child; but it is evident,
not only from the accounts of those biographers, whose works were
composed after the Prince of Bearn had risen into renown as King of
France, but by letters written while he was yet in extreme youth,
that there was something in his whole manner and demeanour which
impressed all those who knew him with a conviction of his future
greatness. We shall have hereafter to cite several of these epistles,
which give an accurate picture of the Prince at the age of thirteen
years; but before that time he had undergone a long course of
desultory instruction. At one period his education was carried on in
the chateau of Vincennes, where he remained for more than a year with
the royal children; and at another we find him studying in the
college of Navarre, together with the Duke of Anjou, who afterwards
became King under the name of Henry III., and with Henry, eldest son
of the Duke of Guise, against whom he was destined to take so
prominent a part in arms. At this early age, however, no enmity or
rivalry was apparent between the three Princes; but on the contrary,
to use the words of the memoirs of Nevers, the three Henrys had the
same affection and the same pleasures, and always displayed for one
another so uncommon a degree of complaisance, that not the slightest
dispute took place between them during the whole time they were at
the college. In regard to the course of instruction pursued with the
Prince of Bearn we have no farther information, and only know that he
acquired a sufficient knowledge of the Latin language to translate
with ease all the best writers of Rome; and that he applied himself,
though apparently with no great perseverance, to the art of drawing,
in which he displayed a considerable degree of talent--the Duke of
Nevers, or his biographer, having seen an antique vase which he had
sketched in pen and ink with a masterly hand, and under which he had
written, _Opus principis otiosi_."
The Massacre of St Bartholomew, which has given an infamous immortality to
the name of Charles IX., was unquestionably the great cause of reviving
the religious wars which in the early part of his reign seemed to have
been in a great measure stilled. Mr James does not add much to the
information on the subject already furnished by the French historians, but
he sums it up in a dramatic and interesting manner.
Our space will not permit of our quoting the entire passage, and we shall
rather proceed to the period when the assassination of Henry III. opened
to the King of Navarre the throne of France. The situation of the monarch,
when this brilliant but perilous succession opened to him, is thus justly
described by Mr James:--
"The situation of Henry IV., on his accession to the throne, was
probably the most perilous in which a new monarch was ever placed.
The whole kingdom was convulsed, from end to end, by factions, the
virulence of which against each other had been nourished during many
years of civil war, and not one element of discord and confusion
seemed wanting to render the state of turbulence and anarchy which
existed of long duration. Not only the fierce and relentless spirit
of religious fanaticism, not only the grasping cupidity of selfish
and unprincipled nobles, not only the ambition of powerful and
distinguished leaders entered as ingredients into the strange mass of
contending passions which the country presented, but the long
indulgence of lawless courses, the habits of strife and bloodshed,
the want of universally recognised tribunals, the annihilation of
external commerce, and the utter destitution of financial resources
on all parts, seemed to place insurmountable obstacles in the way of
any speedy restoration of order and prosperity.
"The capital was in a state of rebellion against its legitimate
sovereign; the large towns were, in many instances, held forcibly by
the party opposed to the great majority of the inhabitants; the small
towns and villages were generally disaffected to the royal cause, or
wavering between opposite factions; and the rural districts were
divided in their affections, sometimes presenting three or four
different shades of opinion within the space of as many leagues. One
province was nearly entirely Protestant, another almost altogether
Catholic, another equally divided between the two religions. The
Parliament of Paris thundered against the Parliament of Tours; the
partisans of the late king looked with scarcely less jealousy upon
their new sovereign than upon their enemies of the League; and many
of those who were indifferent upon the subject of religion, made it
their first inquiry how they could sell their services to the best
advantage.
"The preceding reigns had extinguished all respect for the law; the
vices of the court had banished all notions of morality; and years of
license had left barely the sense of common decency amongst the
higher classes of the kingdom. Complete disorganisation, in short,
existed throughout the whole fabric of society; and no common
principle of action could be found as a permanent bond in uniting the
members of any great party together. The League itself contained most
discordant materials; but it was far more harmonious in its character
than the great body of the Royalists; for community of religion at
least afforded an apparent motive for combination where more
substantial ties were wanting, while difference of faith in the camp
of the King was at all times a pretext for dissensions which at any
moment might produce disorders, if not actual hostility.
"Such was the state of affairs which Henry knew to exist at the
moment when he received the announcement that he had so suddenly
become King of France. The generous devotion, indeed, of a few loyal
and high-minded men tended greatly to encourage him in the
commencement of his career; but apprehension and perplexity must have
been the first emotions by which he was affected on entering the
Hotel de Gondi and learning that Henry III. was dead. He found still
greater alarm, however, reigning amongst the courtiers of the late
King. Everything was confusion and disarray, and his presence did not
tend to produce harmony and order.
"The moment that his arrival was known, the Scotch guard came and
threw themselves at his feet, exclaiming, 'Oh! Sire, you are now our
king and our master;' and the active and energetic character of the
monarch at once displayed itself in a remarkable manner. Without
losing the time of action in thought, he applied himself to take
advantage of the consternation of others, and secure the fidelity of
the troops and of the court as far as possible, in order that the
death of Henry III. might not altogether dissolve the bonds which
held together the Royalist party, and overthrow the monarchy itself.
He sent directly to the quarters of the Swiss and the French guard,
to Marshal D'Aumont, to Biron, and to all in whom he could trust. He
wrote during the same night to England, to Flanders, to Switzerland,
Germany, and Venice, announcing his accession to the throne, stating
his indisputable title, and requesting immediate aid to make it good
against his enemies.
"But on entering the chamber of the deceased King a strange and
fearful scene presented itself. The room was filled with the Catholic
nobility of France; the minions were at the foot of the bed, with
tapers in their hands, singing the service of the dead; and all the
rest, 'amidst howlings of despair, were drawing down their hats, or
casting them on the ground, clenching their fists, plotting together,
giving each other the hand, making vows and promises, of which
nothing was heard but the ending words--"rather die a thousand
deaths."' One voice, however, gave the interpretation of all: a
gentleman exclaiming aloud, at ten paces from the King, that he would
rather give himself up to any enemies than suffer a Huguenot
monarch."
The battle of Arques was the first in which the great martial and heroic
qualities of the King were displayed in their full lustre; and there Mr
James's animated pen finds a fit subject for description. We pass on,
however, to the battle of Ivry, which was, if possible, yet more
marvellous and decisive; for the superiority of force on the part of the
League was still greater; and Henry's heroic band had dwindled away to
little more than one of Napoleon's divisions.
"The numbers of the army of the League it is very difficult to
discover, and, indeed, we can very seldom depend upon the statements
even of contemporaries regarding the forces engaged in any battle. In
one place, Davila reckons the army of Mayenne at four thousand five
hundred horse, and twenty thousand foot; but he evidently greatly
exaggerates the strength of the infantry, while Aubigne states the
numbers at five thousand cavalry, and eight thousand foot, and Cayet
says that Mayenne was accompanied by more than four thousand horse,
and twelve thousand foot. Henry himself, in his despatch to Monsieur
de la Verune, governor of Caen, does not venture even to guess at the
numbers of his adversary, but merely says, that the prisoners state
their army to have consisted of four thousand horse, and twelve
thousand foot, thus confirming the account of Victor Cayet. The
Royalist force did not amount to more than two thousand horse, and
about eight thousand foot. Just as the battle was about to commence,
however, Sully arrived from Pacy, bringing with him his own company,
and two companies of English horse arquebusiers, under Colonel James.
Several other reinforcements joined during the morning; and it cannot
be doubted that the flocking in of zealous friends, while Henry
occupied the plain of Ivry, tended greatly to encourage his forces,
and to make them forget the superiority of the enemy. As at Coutras,
the army of the League appeared covered with glittering trappings,
lace and embroidery, while that of the King displayed nothing but
cold gray steel.
"As soon as his troops had taken up their position, Henry rode along
the line, mounted on a powerful bay charger, clothed in complete
armour, but with his head bare, speaking words of hope and confidence
to the soldiers, and exhorting them to show the same valour here that
they had already displayed in many a perilous enterprise. His
countenance was bold and fearless; but it was remarked, that, moved
by his own words, his eyes more than once filled with tears. He
represented to his troops, that the road to safety, as well as to
glory, lay before them; that the crown of France depended upon their
swords; that there were no new armies to fall back upon in case of
defeat: no other nobles in France to take the field for him, if they
who surrounded him should fail. He then put himself at the head of
the line, where he could be seen by all, and heard by many, and with
his hands clasped and his eyes raised to heaven, he exclaimed: 'I
pray thee, oh God, who alone knowest the intentions of man's heart,
to do thy will upon me as thou shalt judge necessary for the weal of
Christendom, and to preserve me so long as thou knowest I am needful
for the happiness and repose of this land, and no longer.' Then
turning to his own squadron, he took his casque, surmounted by a
large plume of white feathers, and said: 'Companions, God is with us,
there stand his enemies and ours. Here is your king. Upon them! and
if you lose your cornets, rally to my white plume. You will find it
in the road to victory and honour.' During some part of the morning
one of his officers remarked to him that he had provided no place of
retreat, but Henry replied: 'There is no other retreat than the field
of battle.'
"Before commencing the engagement, the King performed one of those
generous and honourable acts, so well calculated to win all hearts,
and carry the love of his people along with him. It would seem that
Schomberg, who commanded the Germans in his service, had previously
demanded the pay of his troops, which was long in arrear, and that
Henry had replied sharply: 'No brave man ever asked for money on the
eve of a battle.' At this moment of peril the King's heart smote him
for what he had said; and approaching the old officer, he spoke thus:
'Monsieur de Schomberg, I have injured you. This day may be the last
of my life, and I would not take away the honour of any gentleman. I
know your valour and your merit, and I beseech you to pardon and
embrace me.'
"'Sire,' answered Schomberg, 'you wounded me the other day it is
true, but to-day you kill me; for the honour you do me will force me
to die for your service.'
"It is probable that immediately after this incident a movement in
advance, mentioned by the king in all his despatches, was made on the
part of the royal army, for, till between ten and eleven o'clock, the
forces of the League were at such a distance, that it was possible
for Mayenne to avoid a battle. The King still apparently imagined
that such might be his adversary's intention, for he says in his
circular letter respecting the great victory of Ivry, that the
enemy's troops having appeared still farther off than they had been
on the preceding evening, he resolved to approach so close that they
must of necessity fight; and having, in consequence, gone to seek
them even to the spot where they had planted themselves, 'from which
they never advanced but so far as was necessary to come to the
charge,' the battle took place. Judging from this adherence to his
position, and from the stillness of his skirmishers, that Mayenne was
determined not to commence the engagement, Henry took advantage of an
error which the Duke had committed in the choice of his ground, and
which exposed his cavalry, scattered over the face of a slope. He
accordingly ordered his artillery to open a fire upon the adverse
squadrons, which was executed by M. de la Guiche with great precision
and effect, nine discharges taking place before the Leaguers could
fire a gun. Nearly at the same time, news was brought that Monsieur
de Humieres, Mouy, and about three hundred horse, were hurrying up to
join the King, and were barely a mile distant; but Henry would not
delay the engagement.
"The battle was now begun by the light horse advancing on the part of
the League, followed by a heavy body of lanzknechts; but they were
met in full career by Marshal D'Aumont, at the head of about three
hundred men-at-arms, and driven back in confusion to the edge of the
wood, called La Haye des pres, where D'Aumont, according to the
commands he had previously received from Henry, halted his small
force, and returned in good order. While this was taking place on the
left of the King's army, a body of reiters from the enemy's right,
advanced against the light horse of Givri and the Grand Prior, but
were repulsed; and having made their charge and fired their pistols,
retired, as was the common practice of the German troopers, to form
behind the men-at-arms. The Royalist light horse, however, had been
thrown into some disorder by this attack, and were immediately after
assailed by a squadron of heavy cavalry, consisting of Walloons and
Flemings, who, with their long lances, bade fair to overthrow Givri
and the Grand Prior, when the Baron de Biron, by a well-timed charge
in flank, broke through their ranks, receiving two wounds in his
advance. Montpensier now moved forward to encounter the same corps in
front, and after having his horse killed under him, succeeded in
restoring the advantage to the Royalists in that part of the field.
Before this was accomplished, Mayenne, with the great bulk of his
cavalry, advanced against the King himself. He was accompanied by
Count Egmont, the Duke of Nemours, and the Chevalier D'Aumale, and
had on his left a body of five hundred carabineers, on horseback, all
picked men, well armed and mounted, who, galloping forward till they
were within twenty yards of Henry's division, poured a tremendous
fire upon it, and then gave place to the men-at-arms. At that moment,
however, the King spurred on his horse two lengths before any of his
troops, and, followed by his whole squadron, 'plunged,' to use the
words of Aubigne, 'into the forest of lances,' which lay before him.
Even that bitter satirist cannot avoid giving way to some enthusiasm
in describing the charge of his royal master. 'By the first strokes,'
he says, 'appeared what quality can effect against quantity.' For
more than a quarter of an hour the struggle was fierce, and the small
squadron of the King was lost to the sight of the rest of the army in
the dense cloud of Mayenne's cavalry.
"At length the Leaguers were seen to waver; some fled, others
followed, and in an instant after, all was rout and confusion amongst
the immense body of horse, which a few minutes before had moved up so
gallantly to the assault. But as the enemy fled from before him,
Henry was exposed to a new danger, and found that the battle was not
yet won. As he issued forth from the midst of the flying masses of
Mayenne's horse, with but twelve or fifteen companions at his side,
and exactly between the two regiments of adverse Swiss, three troops
of Walloons, who as yet had not taken any share in the battle,
appeared ready to charge his little band. D'Aumont, however, with the
Grand Prior, Tremouille, and the gallant Givri, advanced to his
deliverance, and this fresh body of cavalry was routed in a moment.
In the heat of the melee Henry's standard-bearer was killed, and one
of his pages, who bore in his casque a white plume similar to that of
the King, fell beside him. A report had spread instantly that the
King was slain, and a momentary panic had seized the persons round
the spot where he was supposed to have fallen. But when he reappeared
from amidst the dense crowd of enemies, covered with blood and dust,
a loud shout of 'Vive le Roi!' burst from the ranks of the Royalists,
and added speed to the flight of the enemy. Marshal Biron, who had
remained immoveable, watching the progress of the fight, and ready to
act wherever a great necessity presented itself, now joined the
monarch, saying, 'This day, sire, you have performed the part of
Marshal Biron, and Marshal Biron that of the King.'
"'Let us praise God, Marshal,' answered Henry, 'for the victory is
his.'"
Henry's generous temper, and, withal, turn for fun and drollery, is well
depicted in the account of his forgiveness of Mayenne, the ablest of his
opponents--
"In the meantime, negotiations went on for the reconciliation of the
Duke of Mayenne with his sovereign. His demands were greater,
perhaps, than were justified by his position; but Gabrielle d'
Estrees, who was now with the monarch, exerted all her influence to
render him favourable to the Duke, and Henry consented, at length, to
a treaty, by which it was declared, in regard to the death of Henry
III., that, all things weighed, and the evidence examined, it
appeared to the King, that the Princes and the Princesses of the
League had taken no part in that crime. The Parliaments of the realm
were consequently forbidden to proceed against them. Three places
were given to the Duke in Burgundy and Champagne, as security for six
years, the King burthened himself with the debts which Mayenne had
contracted during the war, and a term of six weeks was granted to the
other Leaguers, who were still in arms, to give in their adhesion to
the treaty of peace.
"This having been settled, and Mayenne feeling deeply the clemency of
the monarch, who had thus, in fact, loaded him with favours, when he
had nothing to expect but disgrace and punishment, set out to make
his submission in person to the King, who was then at Monceaux with
the fair Gabrielle. When he arrived, Henry was in the beautiful park
of that place, attended only by Sully, and on his approach the
monarch advanced to meet him. Mayenne knelt before the King, and
embraced his knees, assuring him of his fidelity for the future, and
thanking him for having delivered him 'from the arrogance of the
Spaniards, and the cunning of the Italians.' The King then hastened
to raise him, and embraced him three times with the utmost
cordiality, after which, taking him by the hand, and changing the
subject, he led him through the park, pointing out the changes and
improvements he intended to make. The King walked with his usual
rapid pace; Mayenne, who had become excessively fat, and was troubled
both with gout and sciatica, followed with difficulty, panting,
limping, and growing red in the face. With good-humoured malice,
Henry continued this exercise for some time, whispering to Sully, 'If
I walk this great body much longer, I shall avenge myself without
much trouble;' and then, turning to Mayenne, he added, 'Tell the
truth, cousin, do I not go somewhat fast for you?' The Duke replied
that he was ready to expire.
"'There is my hand,' replied the King, embracing him again; 'take it,
for on my life this is all the vengeance that I shall ever seek.'"
A most imperfect idea of Henry's character, however, would be formed, if
his gallantry in action, conduct in war, and generosity in victory alone
are taken into view. His pacific administration, and plans of social
improvement, are also worthy of the very highest admiration; and his
premature death is, perhaps, chiefly to be lamented, because it prevented
so many of them from being carried into full effect. They are thus
sketched by Mr James on the authority of Sully, the King's prime
minister:--
"It is difficult to arrive at any precise notion of Henry's ultimate
views; and the want of full information has induced many writers to
disbelieve the fact of his having entertained any of the definite and
extensive schemes attributed to him by contemporaries; but the
concurring testimony of those who knew him best, leads me to believe,
that a favourite project, of a comprehensive and extraordinary
character, occupied many of his thoughts from the moment that he felt
himself firmly seated on the throne of France. Sully seems to think
that the scheme was perfectly practicable; but whether the object was
limited, as some have asserted, to reducing the power of the house of
Austria, or whether it extended to the partition of Europe into
fifteen great monarchies, and to the establishment of a 'Christian
Republic,' (by means of a general council, representing those powers,
and sitting permanently,) as others affirm--whether the one design
was a fixed and clearly defined resolution, and the other merely a
brilliant but evanescent fancy, it would be very difficult in these
days to ascertain. Certain it is, that Henry demanded from his
minister Sully various written schemes and statements, as steps to
the execution of some very great and difficult design, which would
require the whole resources of France to be economised for many
years; and, from the plans thus formed, issued a number of most
beneficial projects, few of which, unhappily for posterity, were
carried into effect. In the joint labours of the King and his
minister, new objects, new regulations, presented themselves every
hour; memorial brought forth memorial; one scheme branched out into
half a dozen others; institutions were conceived; laws were drawn up;
and a completely new organisation of society, founded on notions of
transcendent excellence, such as the world has never seen, appeared
as visions to the eyes of the monarch and his friend.
"To afford some idea of the vastness and also of the visionary
character of these designs, I will give, in a somewhat abbreviated
form, part of the account furnished by Sully himself, of the contents
of a cabinet to be prepared for the King in one of the halls of the
Louvre, which were to comprise, arranged in drawers and cases, all
the memoirs and reports about to be collected. 'The labour required
was immense. To obtain a notion of it, without repetitions, let one
imagine every thing connected, immediately or remotely with the
finances, with war, with the artillery, with the navy, commerce and
police, with the coinage, with the mines, and, in a word, with every
part of government, interior and exterior, ecclesiastic, civil,
political, and domestic. Every one of all these parts had its
separate place in this state cabinet, so that all the documents
concerning it would be found ready to the hand at a glance, in
whatever quantity they might be. On the side appropriated to the
finances, were seen the collection of different regulations, records
of financial operations, changes made or to be made, the sums to
receive or to be paid, and an almost innumerable mass of statements,
memorials, totals, and summaries, more or less abridged.
"In regard to military matters, besides the accounts, details, and
memorials, marking the actual state of things, there would have been
found the edicts and state papers, works upon tactics, plans, maps,
and charts of France and other parts of the world. Large copies of
these maps, mixed with various pieces of painting, were to be placed
in the great gallery. The idea also was entertained of appropriating
one of the large halls below, with the floor above, to the purposes
of a museum of models and specimens of all the most curious machines
destined to be used in war, the arts, and different trades, and in
all sorts of exercises, noble, liberal, or mechanical, in order that
those who sought; perfection might come and without trouble instruct
themselves in this silent school. The lower story would have served
for the heavier things, and the higher for the lighter. An exact
inventory of both was to have been amongst the documents of the
cabinet of which I am speaking.
"Lists of all the benefices of the kingdom, with their denomination
and just appreciation, reports of the whole ecclesiastical body,
secular and regular, from the highest prelate to the lowest clerk,
with the distinction of native and foreigner, and of both religions,
would not have been amongst the least curious documents of those
referring to the ecclesiastical government.
"'This labour was the model of another affecting the police, by which
the king would have been able to see, to an individual, the number of
the nobility of the whole realm, divided into classes, and specified
by the difference of titles, estates, &c.; an idea the more agreeable
to the King, as he had been meditating for a long time the plan of a
new order of knighthood, together with that of an academy, a college,
and a royal hospital, destined for the nobility alone, without this
useful and honourable institution being chargeable to the public or
burdensome to the finances. It was proposed at the same time to form
a camp or permanent corps of six thousand infantry, a thousand horse,
and six pieces of artillery, completely equipped. Twelve ships and
twelve galleys kept in good order, corresponded in the naval
department to this new military establishment.
The close of this glorious and beneficent reign is thus described:--
"Certain it is that Henry's mind was filled with gloomy anticipations
which neither business nor pleasure could banish; for the moment he
was unoccupied dark and bitter meditations fell upon him, from which
he found it impossible to rouse himself. Intimations of coming
danger, too, were frequent; a courier from France carried news of his
death to Germany eight days before it happened. On the altar, at
Montargis, was found a paper, announcing that in a few days he would
perish by the hand of an assassin. Public prayers were offered up in
some parts of the Spanish territory for the success of a great
enterprise to be carried on in France; and many warnings were given
to Henry himself. The monarch, however, would pay no attention to
them, notwithstanding the presentiment with which he himself was
filled; and it is said that when, on the day of his death, his son,
the Duke of Vendome, came to tell him that La Brosse, the astrologer,
had predicted that great danger menaced him that day, Henry merely
laughed, saying, 'La Brosse is an old fox who wishes to have your
money, and you a young fool to believe him. Our days are counted
before God.' Perhaps more attention might often have been paid to
astrologers by great men if they had recollected that such
intimations may sometimes come from other sources than the stars, and
that many of those persons looked upon it as a part of their trade to
obtain intelligence of meditated designs in support of their
pretended science.
"The coronation of the Queen passed off without any accident; and her
ceremonious entrance into Paris was appointed for the 16th of the
month. The troops of the crown were already assembled on the
frontier, fifty pieces of artillery had been sent on to wait the
coming of the King, and he was to set out immediately after the
approaching pageant, in order to put himself at the head of his
troops: but, to the surprise of all, Spain and the Low Countries
remained in a state of the most perfect tranquillity; no preparations
for resistance were seen, no movement was made to turn away the
coming storm. This is the only circumstance which could throw the
slightest suspicion on the Archduke of taking any part in the crime
about to be perpetrated. On the 14th of May the King showed himself
restless and uneasy, but nevertheless he went, as usual, to hear mass
at the church of the Feuillans, and returned in safety to the palace.
The Queen, frightened by the predictions of the astrologers, besought
him not to go out any more that day. Henry laughed at her fears, but
still showed himself gloomy and disquieted, walked in an agitated
manner into the gardens of the Tuileries, talked more than once of
death: and when Bassompierre represented to him the immense
prosperity to which he had attained, and asked him what he could
desire more, he replied, with a deep sigh, 'My friend, all this must
be quitted.'
"He twice cast himself upon his bed to seek sleep, but in vain; and
about four o'clock demanded his coach, to proceed to the arsenal, in
order to confer with Sully, who was unwell. As soon as the carriage
was ready, he descended to the court and entered the vehicle,
accompanied by the Dukes of Epernon and Montbazon, with Roquelaure,
Lavardin, and La Force, giving some orders to Vitry, captain of the
guard, before he set out. He was followed by a small troop of
gentlemen on horseback, and the carriage was surrounded by a number
of running footmen.
"The large coaches of that day could be entirely closed by a sort of
door, or blind, which let down from the top: but the day being hot,
and Henry wishing to see the preparations which were going on for the
Queen's public entry, the carriage was left open on both sides, and
he himself remained exposed to the gaze of the people. Passing down
the Rue St Honore, the royal party turned into the Rue de la
Feronnerie, in itself narrow, and still farther straitened by a
number of small shops, built against the wall of the cemetery of the
Innocents, which Henry, some time before, had ordered to be pulled
down. At the moment the carriage entered the street, a cart, loaded
with barrels of wine, was on the right side, and another, filled with
hay, upon the left, so that the coachman was obliged to stop, while
the footmen ran round by the cemetery to remove the obstruction.
"At that moment a man, who had followed the carriage from the Louvre,
put one foot upon the front wheel, the other upon a stone at the
side, and, reaching into the carriage, struck the King a violent blow
with a knife. Henry immediately exclaimed, 'I am wounded;' but
notwithstanding the number of persons who were with him, the assassin
was suffered to repeat the blow, which now pierced the King to the
heart. A third blow was caught in the sleeve of one of the
attendants; and, instead of throwing down the knife and flying, the
man who had done the deed stood with the bloody weapon in his hand,
and calmly allowed himself to be seized by those who ran up at the
outcry which took place. The guards would have instantly put him to
death; but Epernon, fortunately for his own reputation, interfered,
and ordered him to be secured.
"In the meantime Henry uttered not a word, and the report forthwith
spread that the King was killed. His officers, however, wisely
assured the people that he was only wounded, and called loudly for
some wine, while the blinds of the carriage were let down, and the
vehicle turned towards the Louvre. The body was immediately removed
from the coach and laid upon a bed. Surgeons and physicians hurried
to the room; and we are informed by Bassompierre, who was present,
that Henry breathed one sigh after he was brought in. Life, however,
was probably extinguished at once by the second blow; for he never
uttered a word after he received it, but fell upon the shoulder of
the Duke of Epernon, with the blood flowing from his mouth as well as
from the wound.
"Thus died Henry IV. of France, in the fifty-seventh year of his age,
one of the greatest, and certainly one of the most beloved Kings of
France, on whom contemporaries bestowed the title of the Great, but
who was known to his people, and is ever mentioned in history, by the
name of Henri Quatre, a term connected in the mind of every Frenchman
with the ideas of goodness, benevolence, sincerity, and courage.
After having to fight for his throne against the fierce opposition of
fanaticism; after having to contend with the arms and the intrigues
of the Roman Catholic world; after having to struggle with the hatred
of a great part of his people, excited by the wild declamations of
preachers and demagogues, and with the coldness and indifference of
almost all the rest, he had succeeded, not only in obtaining the
crown to which he was entitled, not only in vanquishing his enemies
in the field, in subduing his rebellious subjects, in repulsing his
foreign foes, and overcoming the prejudices of his people, but in
gaining their devoted love, the esteem of all his allies, and the
reverence even of those opposed to him."
The extracts we have now given, will convey to our readers a fair idea of
this very interesting and valuable work. We earnestly recommend it to
their attention: when once in their hands, it will speak for itself.
Several emendations, some in the composition, others in the construction,
will, doubtless, in another edition, suggest themselves to the judgment
and good taste of the author. There are no arguments to chapters, no
index, and no table of contents. These, in a work of history, are
indispensable, and should be added forthwith. A novelist who brings five
or six characters on the stage, can afford to let them explain their own
story; but a historian, who is involved in the transactions of five or six
hundred, has need of every mechanical aid which industry can furnish, to
enable his readers to follow the complicated thread of events, or turn to
them again, when required on reference. It is to be wished, also, that Mr
James would intersperse his spirited narrative, especially in the scenes
of memorable events, with a few of those beautiful descriptions of Nature
with which his novels abound, and which would be peculiarly appropriate in
a work on French history, from his intimate acquaintance with the
topography and scenery of the places where his story is laid.
_Printed by William Blackwood and Sons, Edinburgh._
Footnotes:
[1] "Gentlemen," said a quondam acquaintance of ours, rising to return
thanks to a party of fox-hunters who had proposed his health--"I thank you
all for drinking my health, and E. for speaking as he has just done of my
riding. You all know that a younger son has not much choice in
horse-flesh; but should it please Providence to take my elder brother, you
would see me differently mounted, and I might then, perhaps, be able to do
something more worthy of your commendation; so allow me to propose in
return for your kindness, '_The chances of the chase_.'"
[2] _Out-doors_--because, as we have said in _Birboniana_, it would take
years to explore the numismatic and other treasures of the museums.
[3] _Anas Boschias._
[4] In allusion to the ancient name of Paris, "Lutetia,"--from _lutum_,
_mud_.
[5] "Invita que Jovi nectar Junone ministrat."--OVID.
[6] Divine honours were first paid to this snake in Rome on occasion of a
great pestilence which prevailed during the consulate of Q. Fabius and J.
Brutus. His form, rudely sculptured, and much water-worn, is still to be
made out on the side of a stone barque, stranded in a Tiber-washed garden
belonging to a convent of Franciscans, which convent, rich in Christian as
well as these Pagan relics, possesses the complete osteology of two of the
Apostles.
[7] See the Affiche of the Parisian _Sage Femme; passim_.
[8] Colubraria insula maris Balearinci colubris scatens, vulg. Dragonera.
[9] Vide _Aulus Gellius_, lib. vi.
[10] _Materials for a History of Oil Painting._ By C. L. EASTLAKE, R.A.
[11] We venture to throw out a conjecture respecting this Ludius, (by the
bye, there were two of that name,) as an attempt to throw some light upon
a passage in the "Sirmio" of Catullus, which has puzzled and led the
commentators into very far-fetched explanations. The lines are--
"Salve, O venusta Sirmio! atque hero gaude:
Gaudete, vosque, _Ludiae lacus undae_:
Ridete, quidquid est domi cachinnorum."
I have adopted the word Ludiae, before it is so in some editions given.
Catullus, returning from his profitless expedition into Asia Minor,
addresses his home (his villa) with affectionate address of a weary and
longing traveller. He speaks of his home delights, his accustomed
bed,--and then terminates with the above lines. What were the "Ludiae lacus
undae?" May it allude to the pictures painted on the walls of his villa;
and very probably by this Ludius--for the word _domi_ would seem to
indicate something within his dwelling, and this idea answers accurately
to the sort of pictures which Pliny represents Ludius to have painted.
Though Catullus is said to have died in his forty-sixth year, B.C. 40, and
Augustus, A.D. 14, it is very possible that Ludius, who is said to have
lived in the time of Augustus, may have ornamented with his pictures the
villa of Catullus. We offer this conjecture for no more than it is
worth--it may be at least as probable as many others which have been made.
[12] "Some of the English painters," says Tingry, "too anxious to receive
the fruits of their composition, neglect this precaution, (preserving the
colours in newly painted pictures before they are varnished, by covering
them with white of egg.) Several artists even paint in varnish, and _apply
it with their colors_. This precipitate method gives brilliancy to their
compositions at the very moment of their being finished; but their lustre
is temporary and of short duration. It renders it impossible for them to
clean their paintings, which are, besides, liable to crack and lose their
colour. In a word, it is not uncommon to see an artist survive his own
works."
[13] Van Stry asserted that copal was constantly used by Cuyp--his
pictures are remarkably hard.
[14] _Adventures on the Western Coast of South America, &c._ By JOHN
COULTER, M.D. London: 1847.
[15] See No. CCCLXXXI, page 21.
[16] _Byways of History, from the Twelfth to the Sixteenth Century._ By
Mrs PERCY SINNETT.
[17] See Sismondi's _History of the Italian Republics_, vol. iii. p. 58.
[18] _Life of Henry IV. of France._ By G. P. R. JAMES, Esq. 3 Vols.
London, 1847.
[19] See Capefigue, _Hist. de la Ligue et de Henry IV._, iii. 239. He is a
Roman Catholic writer, and therefore cannot be suspected of Huguenot
partiality, or aversion to the Church of Rome.
[20] Lamartine's _Histoire des Girondins_, vii. 374. We hope ere long to
make our readers acquainted with this magnificent work.
Transcriber's Notes:
Passages in italics are indicated by _italics_.
The original text includes Greek characters. For this text version these
letters have been replaced with transliterations.
Punctuation has been corrected without note.
The following misprints have been corrected:
"for for" corrected to "for" (page 262)
"of of" corrected to "of" (page 349)
"protraiture" corrected to "portraiture" (page 373)
Other than the corrections listed above, inconsistencies in spelling and
hyphenation have been retained from the original.