But certainly the greatness of this Author's Genius do's no where so

much appear, as where he gives his Imagination an entire Loose, and

raises his Fancy to a flight above Mankind and the Limits of the visible

World. Such are his Attempts in _The Tempest_, _Midsummer-Night's

Dream_, _Macbeth_ and _Hamlet_. Of these, _The Tempest_, however it

comes to be plac'd the first by the former Publishers of his Works, can

never have been the first written by him: It seems to me as perfect in

its Kind, as almost any thing we have of his. One may observe, that the

Unities are kept here with an Exactness uncommon to the Liberties of his

Writing: Tho' that was what, I suppose, he valu'd himself least upon,

since his Excellencies were all of another Kind. I am very sensible that

he do's, in this Play, depart too much from that likeness to Truth which

ought to be observ'd in these sort of Writings; yet he do's it so very

finely, that one is easily drawn in to have more Faith for his sake,

than Reason does well allow of. His Magick has something in it very

Solemn and very Poetical: And that extravagant Character of _Caliban_ is

mighty well sustain'd, shews a wonderful Invention in the Author, who

could strike out such a particular wild Image, and is certainly one of

the finest and most uncommon Grotesques that was ever seen. The

Observation, which I have been inform'd[A] three very great Men

concurr'd in making upon this Part, was extremely just. _That

_Shakespear_ had not only found out a new Character in his _Caliban_, but

had also devis'd and adapted a new manner of Language for that

Character._ Among the particular Beauties of this Piece, I think one may

be allow'd to point out the Tale of _Prospero_ in the First Act; his

Speech to _Ferdinand_ in the Fourth, upon the breaking up the Masque of

_Juno_ and _Ceres_; and that in the Fifth, where he dissolves his

Charms, and resolves to break his Magick Rod. This Play has been alter'd

by Sir _William D'Avenant_ and Mr. _Dryden_; and tho' I won't Arraign

the Judgment of those two great Men, yet I think I may be allow'd to

say, that there are some things left out by them, that might, and even

ought to have been kept in. Mr. _Dryden_ was an Admirer of our Author,

and, indeed, he owed him a great deal, as those who have read them both

may very easily observe. And, I think, in Justice to 'em both, I should

not on this Occasion omit what Mr. _Dryden_ has said of him.

Shakespear, _who, taught by none, did first impart

To _Fletcher_ Wit, to lab'ring _Johnson_ Art.

He, Monarch-like, gave those his Subjects Law,

And is that Nature which they Paint and Draw.

_Fletcher_ reach'd that which on his heights did grow,

Whilst _Johnson_ crept and gather'd all below:

This did his Love, and this his Mirth digest,

One imitates him most, the other best.

If they have since out-writ all other Men,

'Tis with the Drops which fell from _Shakespear_'s Pen.

The[B]Storm which vanish'd on the neighb'ring Shoar,

Was taught by _Shakespear_'s Tempest to roar.

That Innocence and Beauty which did smile

In _Fletcher_, grew on this _Enchanted Isle_.

But _Shakespear_'s Magick could not copied be,

Within that Circle none durst walk but he._

_I must confess 'twas bold, nor would you now

That Liberty to vulgar Wits allow,

Which works by Magick supernatural things:

But _Shakespear_'s Pow'r is Sacred as A King's._

Prologue to _The Tempest_, as it

is alter'd by Mr. _Dryden_.

It is the same Magick that raises the Fairies in _Midsummer Night's

Dream_, the Witches in _Macbeth_, and the Ghost in _Hamlet_, with

Thoughts and Language so proper to the Parts they sustain, and so

peculiar to the Talent of this Writer. But of the two last of these

Plays I shall have occasion to take notice, among the Tragedies of Mr.

_Shakespear_. If one undertook to examine the greatest part of these by

those Rules which are establish'd by _Aristotle_, and taken from the

Model of the _Grecian_ Stage, it would be no very hard Task to find a

great many Faults: But as _Shakespear_ liv'd under a kind of mere Light

of Nature, and had never been made acquainted with the Regularity of

those written Precepts, so it would be hard to judge him by a Law he

knew nothing of. We are to consider him as a Man that liv'd in a State

of almost universal License and Ignorance: There was no establish'd

Judge, but every one took the liberty to Write according to the Dictates

of his own Fancy. When one considers, that there is not one Play before

him of a Reputation good enough to entitle it to an Appearance on the

present Stage, it cannot but be a Matter of great Wonder that he should

advance Dramatick Poetry so far as he did. The Fable is what is

generally plac'd the first, among those that are reckon'd the

constituent Parts of a Tragick or Heroick Poem; not, perhaps, as it is

the most Difficult or Beautiful, but as it is the first properly to be

thought of in the Contrivance and Course of the whole; and with the

Fable ought to be consider'd, the fit Disposition, Order and Conduct of

its several Parts. As it is not in this Province of the _Drama_ that the

Strength and Mastery of _Shakespear_ lay, so I shall not undertake the

tedious and ill-natur'd Trouble to point out the several Faults he was

guilty of in it. His Tales were seldom invented, but rather taken either

from true History, or Novels and Romances: And he commonly made use of

'em in that Order, with those Incidents, and that extent of Time in

which he found 'em in the Authors from whence he borrow'd them. So _The

Winter's Tale_, which is taken from an old Book, call'd, _The Delectable

History of_ Dorastus _and_ Faunia, contains the space of sixteen or

seventeen Years, and the Scene is sometimes laid in _Bohemia_, and

sometimes in _Sicily_, according to the original Order of the Story.

Almost all his Historical Plays comprehend a great length of Time, and

very different and distinct Places: And in his _Antony_ and _Cleopatra_,

the Scene travels over the greatest Part of the _Roman_ Empire. But in

Recompence for his Carelessness in this Point, when he comes to another

Part of the _Drama_, _The Manners of his Characters, in Acting or

Speaking what is proper for them, and fit to be shown by the Poet_, he

may be generally justify'd, and in very many places greatly commended.

For those Plays which he has taken from the _English_ or _Roman_

History, let any Man compare 'em, and he will find the Character as

exact in the Poet as the Historian. He seems indeed so far from

proposing to himself any one Action for a Subject, that the Title very

often tells you, 'tis _The Life of King_ John, _King_ Richard, _&c._

What can be more agreeable to the Idea our Historians give of _Henry_

the Sixth, than the Picture _Shakespear_ has drawn of him! His Manners

are every where exactly the same with the Story; one finds him still

describ'd with Simplicity, passive Sanctity, want of Courage, weakness

of Mind, and easie Submission to the Governance of an imperious Wife,

or prevailing Faction: Tho' at the same time the Poet do's Justice to

his good Qualities, and moves the Pity of his Audience for him, by

showing him Pious, Disinterested, a Contemner of the Things of this

World, and wholly resign'd to the severest Dispensations of God's

Providence. There is a short Scene in the Second Part of _Henry_ VI.

_Vol. III. pag._ 1504. which I cannot but think admirable in its Kind.

Cardinal _Beaufort_, who had murder'd the Duke of _Gloucester_, is shewn

in the last Agonies on his Death-Bed, with the good King praying over

him. There is so much Terror in one, so much Tenderness and moving Piety

in the other, as must touch any one who is capable either of Fear or

Pity. In his _Henry_ VIII. that Prince is drawn with that Greatness of

Mind, and all those good Qualities which are attributed to him in any

Account of his Reign. If his Faults are not shewn in an equal degree,

and the Shades in this Picture do not bear a just Proportion to the

Lights, it is not that the Artist wanted either Colours or Skill in the

Disposition of 'em; but the truth, I believe, might be, that he forbore

doing it out of regard to Queen _Elizabeth_, since it could have been no

very great Respect to the Memory of his Mistress, to have expos'd some

certain Parts of her Father's Life upon the Stage. He has dealt much

more freely with the Minister of that Great King, and certainly nothing

was ever more justly written, than the Character of Cardinal _Wolsey_.

He has shewn him Tyrannical, Cruel, and Insolent in his Prosperity; and

yet, by a wonderful Address, he makes his Fall and Ruin the Subject of

general Compassion. The whole Man, with his Vices and Virtues, is finely

and exactly describ'd in the second Scene of the fourth Act. The

Distresses likewise of Queen _Katherine_, in this Play, are very

movingly touch'd: and tho' the Art of the Poet has skreen'd King _Henry_

from any gross Imputation of Injustice, yet one is inclin'd to wish, the

Queen had met with a Fortune more worthy of her Birth and Virtue. Nor

are the Manners, proper to the Persons represented, less justly

observ'd, in those Characters taken from the _Roman_ History; and of

this, the Fierceness and Impatience of _Coriolanus_, his Courage and

Disdain of the common People, the Virtue and Philosophical Temper of

_Brutus_, and the irregular Greatness of Mind in _M. Antony_, are

beautiful Proofs. For the two last especially, you find 'em exactly as

they are describ'd by _Plutarch_, from whom certainly _Shakespear_

copy'd 'em. He has indeed follow'd his Original pretty close, and taken

in several little Incidents that might have been spar'd in a Play. But,

as I hinted before, his Design seems most commonly rather to describe

those great Men in the several Fortunes and Accidents of their Lives,

than to take any single great Action, and form his Work simply upon

that. However, there are some of his Pieces, where the Fable is founded

upon one Action only. Such are more especially, _Romeo_ and _Juliet_,

_Hamlet_, and _Othello_. The Design in _Romeo_ and _Juliet_, is plainly

the Punishment of their two Families, for the unreasonable Feuds and

Animosities that had been so long kept up between 'em, and occasion'd

the Effusion of so much Blood. In the management of this Story, he has

shewn something wonderfully Tender and Passionate in the Love-part, and

vary Pitiful in the Distress. _Hamlet_ is founded on much the same Tale

with the _Electra_ of _Sophocles_. In each of 'em a young Prince is

engag'd to Revenge the Death of his Father, their Mothers are equally

Guilty, are both concern'd in the Murder of their Husbands, and are

afterwards married to the Murderers. There is in the first Part of the

_Greek_ Trajedy, something very moving in the Grief of _Electra_; but as

Mr. _D'Acier_ has observ'd, there is something very unnatural and

shocking in the Manners he has given that Princess and _Orestes_ in the

latter Part. _Orestes_ embrues his Hands in the Blood of his own Mother;

and that barbarous Action is perform'd, tho' not immediately upon the

Stage, yet so near, that the Audience hear _Clytemnestra_ crying out to

_Æghystus_ for Help, and to her Son for Mercy: While _Electra_, her

Daughter, and a Princess, both of them Characters that ought to have

appear'd with more Decency, stands upon the Stage and encourages her

Brother in the Parricide. What Horror does this not raise!

_Clytemnestra_ was a wicked Woman, and had deserv'd to Die; nay, in the

truth of the Story, she was kill'd by her own Son; but to represent an

Action of this Kind on the Stage, is certainly an Offence against those

Rules of Manners proper to the Persons that ought to be observ'd there.

On the contrary, let us only look a little on the Conduct of

_Shakespear_. _Hamlet_ is represented with the same Piety towards his

Father, and Resolution to Revenge his Death, as _Orestes_; he has the

same Abhorrence for his Mother's Guilt, which, to provoke him the more,

is heighten'd by Incest: But 'tis with wonderful Art and Justness of

Judgment, that the Poet restrains him from doing Violence to his Mother.

To prevent any thing of that Kind, he makes his Father's Ghost forbid

that part of his Vengeance.

_But howsoever thou pursu'st this Act,

Taint not thy Mind; nor let thy Soul contrive

Against thy Mother ought; leave her to Heav'n,

And to those Thorns that in her Bosom lodge,

To prick and sting her._ Vol. V. p. 2386.

This is to distinguish rightly between _Horror_ and _Terror_. The latter

is a proper Passion of Tragedy, but the former ought always to be

carefully avoided. And certainly no Dramatick Writer ever succeeded

better in raising _Terror_ in the Minds of an Audience than _Shakespear_

has done. The whole Tragedy of _Macbeth_, but more especially the Scene

where the King is murder'd, in the second Act, as well as this Play, is

a noble Proof of that manly Spirit with which he writ; and both shew how

powerful he was, in giving the strongest Motions to our Souls that they

are capable of. I cannot leave _Hamlet_, without taking notice of the

Advantage with which we have seen this Master-piece of _Shakespear_

distinguish it self upon the Stage, by Mr. _Betterton_'s fine

Performance of that Part. A Man, who tho' he had no other good

Qualities, as he has a great many, must have made his way into the

Esteem of all Men of Letters, by this only Excellency. No Man is better

acquainted with _Shakespear_'s manner of Expression, and indeed he has

study'd him so well, and is so much a Master of him, that whatever Part

of his he performs he does it as if it had been written on purpose for

him, and that the Author had exactly conceiv'd it as he plays it. I must

own a particular Obligation to him, for the most considerable part of

the Passages relating to his Life, which I have here transmitted to the

Publick; his Veneration for the Memory of _Shakespear_ having engag'd

him to make a Journey into _Warwickshire_, on purpose to gather up what

Remains he could of a Name for which he had so great a Value. Since I

had at first resolv'd not to enter into any Critical Controversie, I

won't pretend to enquire into the Justness of Mr. _Rhymer_'s Remarks on

_Othello_; he has certainly pointed out some Faults very judiciously;

and indeed they are such as most People will agree, with him, to be

Faults: But I wish he would likewise have observ'd some of the Beauties

too; as I think it became an Exact and Equal Critique to do. It seems

strange that he should allow nothing Good in the whole: If the Fable and

Incidents are not to his Taste, yet the Thoughts are almost every where

very Noble, and the Diction manly and proper. These last, indeed, are

Parts of _Shakespear_'s Praise, which it would be very hard to Dispute

with him. His Sentiments and Images of Things are Great and Natural; and

his Expression (tho' perhaps in some Instances a little Irregular) just,

and rais'd in Proportion to his Subject and Occasion. It would be even

endless to mention the particular Instances that might be given of this

Kind: But his Book is in the Possession of the Publick, and 'twill be

hard to dip into any Part of it, without finding what I have said of him

made good.

The latter Part of his Life was spent, as all Men of good Sense will

wish theirs may be, in Ease, Retirement, and the Conversation of his

Friends. He had the good Fortune to gather an Estate equal to his

Occasion, and, in that, to his Wish; and is said to have spent some

Years before his Death at his native _Stratford_. His pleasurable Wit,

and good Nature, engag'd him in the Acquaintance, and entitled him to

the Friendship of the Gentlemen of the Neighbourhood. Amongst them, it

is a Story almost still remember'd in that Country, that he had a

particular Intimacy with Mr. _Combe_, an old Gentleman noted thereabouts

for his Wealth and Usury: It happen'd, that in a pleasant Conversation

amongst their common Friends, Mr. _Combe_ told _Shakespear_ in a

laughing manner, that he fancy'd, he intended to write his Epitaph, if

he happen'd to out-live him; and since he could not know what might be

said of him when he was dead, he desir'd it might be done immediately:

Upon which _Shakespear_ gave him these four Verses.

_Ten in the Hundred lies here ingrav'd,

'Tis a Hundred to Ten, his Soul is not sav'd:

If any Man ask, Who lies in this Tomb?

Oh! ho! quoth the Devil, 'tis my_ John-a-Combe.

But the Sharpness of the Satyr is said to have stung the Man so

severely, that he never forgave it.

He Dy'd in the 53d Year of his Age, and was bury'd on the North side of

the Chancel, in the Great Church at _Stratford_, where a Monument, as

engrav'd in the Plate, is plac'd in the Wall. On his Grave-Stone

underneath is,

_Good Friend, for Jesus sake, forbear

To dig the Dust inclosed here.

Blest be the Man that spares these Stones,

And Curst be he that moves my Bones._

He had three Daughters, of which two liv'd to be marry'd; _Judith_, the

Elder, to one Mr. _Thomas Quiney_, by whom she had three Sons, who all

dy'd without Children; and _Susannah_, who was his Favourite, to Dr.

_John Hall_, a Physician of good Reputation in that Country. She left

one Child only, a Daughter, who was marry'd first to _Thomas Nash_, Esq;

and afterwards to Sir _John Bernard_ of _Abbington_, but dy'd likewise

without Issue.

This is what I could learn of any Note, either relating to himself or

Family: The Character of the Man is best seen in his Writings. But since

_Ben Johnson_ has made a sort of an Essay towards it in his

_Discoveries_, tho', as I have before hinted, he was not very Cordial in

his Friendship, I will venture to give it in his Words.

"I remember the Players have often mention'd it as an Honour to

_Shakespear_, that in Writing (whatsoever he penn'd) he never blotted

out a Line. My Answer hath been, _Would he had blotted a thousand_,

which they thought a malevolent Speech. I had not told Posterity this,

but for their Ignorance, who chose that Circumstance to commend their

Friend by, wherein he most faulted. And to justifie mine own Candor,

(for I lov'd the Man, and do honour his Memory, on this side Idolatry,

as much as any.) He was, indeed, Honest, and of an open and free Nature,

had an Excellent Fancy, brave Notions, and gentle Expressions, wherein

he flow'd with that Facility, that sometimes it was necessary he should

be stopp'd: _Sufflaminandus erat_, as _Augustus_ said of _Haterius_. His

Wit was in his own Power, would the Rule of it had been so too. Many

times he fell into those things could not escape Laughter; as when he

said in the Person of _Cæsar_, one speaking to him,

"Cæsar _thou dost me Wrong_.

"He reply'd:

"Cæsar _did never Wrong, but with just Cause._

and such like, which were ridiculous. But he redeem'd his Vices with

his Virtues: There was ever more in him to be Prais'd than to be

Pardon'd."

As for the Passage which he mentions out of _Shakespear_, there is

somewhat like it _Julius Cæsar_, Vol. V. p. 2260. but without the

Absurdity; nor did I ever meet with it in any Edition that I have seen,

as quoted by Mr. _Johnson_. Besides his Plays in this Edition, there are

two or three ascrib'd to him by Mr. _Langbain_, which I have never seen,

and know nothing of. He writ likewise, _Venus_ and _Adonis_, and

_Tarquin_ and _Lucrece_, in Stanza's, which have been printed in a late

Collection of Poems. As to the Character given of him by _Ben Johnson_,

there is a good deal true in it: But I believe it may be as well

express'd by what _Horace_ says of the first _Romans_, who wrote Tragedy

upon the _Greek_ Models, (or indeed translated 'em) in his Epistle to

_Augustus_.

_--Naturâ sublimis & Acer

Nam spirat Tragicum satis & fæliciter Audet,

Sed turpem putat in Chartis metuitq; Lituram._

There is a Book of Poems, publish'd in 1640, under the Name of Mr.

_William Shakespear_, but as I have but very lately seen it, without an

Opportunity of making any Judgment upon it, I won't pretend to

determine, whether it be his or no.

[Illustration: Decorative motif]

FOOTNOTES:

[Footnote A: _Ld._ Falkland, _Ld. C.J._ Vaughan, _and Mr._ Selden.]

[Footnote B: Alluding to the Sea-Voyage of _Fletcher_.]

_THE AUGUSTAN REPRINT SOCIETY_

ANNOUNCES ITS

_Publications for the Third Year (1948-1949)_

_At least two_ items will be printed from each of the _three_ following

groups.

Series IV: Men, Manners, and Critics

Sir John Falstaff (pseud.), _The Theatre_ (1720).

Aaron Hill, Preface to _The Creation_, and Thomas Brereton, Preface

to _Esther_.

Ned Ward, Selected Tracts.

Series V: Drama

Edward Moore, _The Gamester_ (1753).

Nevil Payne, _Fatal Jealousy_ (1673).

Mrs. Centlivre, _The Busie Body_ (1709).

Charles Macklin, _Man of the World_ (1781).

Series VI: Poetry and Language

John Oldmixon, _Reflections on Dr. Swift's Letter to Harley_

(1712); and Arthur Mainwaring, _The British Academy_ (1712).

Pierre Nicole, _De Epigrammate_.

Andre Dacier, Essay on Lyric Poetry.

Issues will appear, as usual, in May, July, September, November,

January, and March. In spite of rising costs, membership fees will be

kept at the present annual rate of $2.50 in the United States and

Canada, $2.75 in Great Britain and the continent. British and

continental subscriptions should be sent to B.H. Blackwell, Broad

Street, Oxford, England. American and Canadian subscriptions may be sent

to any one of the General Editors.

* * * * *

TO THE AUGUSTAN REPRINT SOCIETY:

} _the third year_

_I enclose the membership fee for_} _the second and third year_

} _the first, second, and third year_

NAME

ADDRESS

* * * * *

NOTE: All income received by the Society is devoted to defraying cost of

printing and mailing

_THE AUGUSTAN REPRINT SOCIETY_

MAKES AVAILABLE

_Inexpensive Reprints of Rare Materials_

FROM

ENGLISH LITERATURE OF THE SEVENTEENTH AND EIGHTEENTH CENTURIES

Students, scholars, and bibliographers of literature, history, and

philology will find the publications valuable. _The Johnsonian News

Letter_ has said of them: "Excellent facsimiles, and cheap in price,

these represent the triumph of modern scientific reproduction. Be sure

to become a subscriber; and take it upon yourself to see that your

college library is on the mailing list."

The Augustan Reprint Society is a non-profit, scholarly organization,

run without overhead expense. By careful management it is able to offer

at least six publications each year at the unusually low membership fee

of $2.50 per year in the United States and Canada, and $2.75 in Great

Britain and the continent.

Libraries as well as individuals are eligible for membership. Since the

publications are issued without profit, however, no discount can be

allowed to libraries, agents, or booksellers.

New members may still obtain a complete run of the first year's

publications for $2.50, the annual membership fee.

During the first two years the publications are issued in three series:

I. Essays on Wit; II. Essays on Poetry and Language; and III. Essays on

the Stage.

_PUBLICATIONS FOR THE FIRST YEAR (1946-1947)_

MAY, 1946: Series I, No. 1--Richard Blackmore's _Essay upon Wit_ (1716),

and Addison's _Freeholder_ No. 45 (1716).

JULY, 1946: Series II, No. 1--Samuel Cobb's _Of Poetry_ and _Discourse

on Criticism_ (1707).

SEPT., 1946: Series III, No. 1--Anon., _Letter to A.H. Esq.; concerning

the Stage_ (1698), and Richard Willis' _Occasional Paper_

No. IX (1698).

NOV., 1946: Series I, No. 2--Anon., _Essay on Wit_ (1748), together with

Characters by Flecknoe, and Joseph Warton's _Adventurer_

Nos. 127 and 133.

JAN., 1947: Series II, No. 2--Samuel Wesley's _Epistle to a Friend

Concerning Poetry_ (1700) and _Essay on Heroic Poetry_

(1693).

MARCH, 1947: Series III, No. 2--Anon., _Representation of the Impiety

and Immorality of the Stage_ (1704) and anon., _Some Thoughts

Concerning the Stage_ (1704).

_PUBLICATIONS FOR THE SECOND YEAR (1947-1948)_

MAY, 1947: Series I, No. 3--John Gay's _The Present State of Wit_; and a

section on Wit from _The English Theophrastus_. With an

Introduction by Donald Bond.

JULY, 1947: Series II, No. 3--Rapin's _De Carmine Pastorali_, translated

by Creech. With an Introduction by J.E. Congleton.

SEPT., 1947: Series III, No. 3--T. Hanmer's (?) _Some Remarks on the

Tragedy of Hamlet_. With an Introduction by Clarence D.

Thorpe.

NOV., 1947: Series I, No. 4--Corbyn Morris' _Essay towards Fixing the

True Standards of Wit_, etc. With an Introduction by James L.

Clifford.

JAN., 1948: Series II, No. 4--Thomas Purney's _Discourse on the

Pastoral_. With an Introduction by Earl Wasserman.

MARCH, 1948: Series III, No. 4--Essays on the Stage, selected, with an

Introduction by Joseph Wood Krutch.

The list of publications is subject to modification in response to

requests by members. From time to time Bibliographical Notes will be

included in the issues. Each issue contains an Introduction by a scholar

of special competence in the field represented.

The Augustan Reprints are available only to members. They will never be

offered at "remainder" prices.

_GENERAL EDITORS_

Some Account of the Life of Mr. William Shakespear (1709) · 第 2 / 3 段