FROM REV. DR. BARTOL’S MEMORIAL SERMON, OCTOBER 10, 1880.

“I have raised up one from the North.” Isaiah, xli. 25.—It is a curious

case of the truth of the old Bible to nature, or rather of the

coincidence of the two, that both make more physical and moral account

of the north point of the compass than of the south. “Fair weather,”

saith the book of Job, “cometh out of the north;” and thence, too, in

all ages, has come the clearing of the social sky. All the old prophets

and modern geographical scientists, like Mr. Buckle, agree. The south,

says the old writ, is “invaded” with “whirlwinds” and armed men. The

upper strong Barbarians fall upon to purge the dissolute empire of Rome.

From high latitudes come the Scandinavian rovers to be converted into

English lords. From Norway, the north way, comes Leif Ericson before

Columbus to discover America and have his monument, let us trust, in

these last days; and more than forty years ago, yet in the memory of

many that hear me, Ole Bull, whom his friend and compeer of kindred

genius, the poet and novelist now among us, Björnstjerne Björnson, calls

“our greatest citizen,” at his burial in the land where seventy years

ago he was born, dying in his own house on the Isle of Light or Lysö of

a malignant disease, yet with little pain and in full possession of his

powers till within a half hour of his expiring breath....

I must not omit my thanks for the delight Ole Bull gave with his violin

at his first coming to this country more than forty years ago. From the

touch of his bow, as if Neptune were speaking to the sea, a wave swept

over the land from that ocean of harmony that slumbers in the human

soul. Out of the same deeps came a second wave at the voice, much later

among us, of Jenny Lind. Technical criticism cannot countervail much

when a man has just wrought a miracle on the spot, and the United States

rose to this as, in the same calling, never to any other man. Young and

green then, as respects concord and melody, we may have been. The

matchless personal grace of the musician, alike at thirty and

three–score, may have had its part in the effect. Who that saw it does

not remember the appearance that, as Björnson says, made it here, as

well as in Norway on his return, “a feast to look at him;” the supple

sway that was rhythm in his frame, so tall, with its breadth of shoulder

and tapering waist, the firm feet which the broad platform seemed not

worthy to be a stool for, the arms of wrought steel, more flexible than

willow wands, the face in which, as much as in any countenance we ever

beheld, the smile was a benediction, and the hair that was tossed about

his brow as if inspired with the unison of the strings; and had he

spoken on the stage where he stood, the whole audience would have known

as well as some of us in private soon did, that the violin was not, and

no instrument made with hands could be, so sweet as the voice. He was

embodied beauty and an incarnate hymn—a mesmeric, irresistible man....

His speech, of which I shall give some samples as I close, like Anton

Rubinstein’s, was as rare and original as his notes. He was not, like

some people I have known, marvelous in a performance as of a sermon or a

tune, and, on leaving desk or orchestra, with nought of interest left,

the whole man gone, spent, exploded in what had been sounded or said. To

be a true artist is a wonderful thing. But into the artist the whole of

him, as of none truly great or good, could not be put....

But musical was with him largely a form of patriotic feeling, and for

love of liberty for himself and all men he was a living flame. He

respected more the nobility of nature than of political schemes. The

pretensions of barons and earls in England or elsewhere, not backed up

by personal merit, were nought to him, mere ciphers, deriving all their

value from their situation in a column. In the honest but reactionary

King of Norway he had a social friend; but, in pushing the right assumed

of veto against laws of the Norwegian parliament, this little potentate

of two or three millions of subjects became his diplomatic foe; and Ole

Bull represented the peasant population of the kingdom. It was natural

he should sympathize strongly with us against secession and slavery in

our civil war, and he maintained our cause abroad as warmly as he did in

our midst. Like David, he declared God’s statute of freedom, “speaking

of his testimonies before kings and was not ashamed.”...

It remains to consider Ole Bull not only as an artist and patriot, but

man; for, beyond all else, he was humane, cosmopolite, a citizen of the

world, and did not distinguish himself, save by genius which he could

not help, from other men, but was in union and close communion with all;

and detract as we may from a man’s talents, or criticise as we will his

accomplishments, the fact of a great wide and common love for him and

from him cannot be set aside. He was a magnet. Living nearer to the

North Pole, had he borrowed a bit of the lodestone that poises the

planet? His attraction was as constant and inexhaustible for the world.

A young man, a natural player, from our rough Cape Ann yonder, seeks him

abroad to get lessons, and Ole welcomes him at once. “How did you like

him?” the young man was asked. “Like him? I cannot say enough to tell

you.” Money went from him, as it came, like wind or water. Being

unpractical if not careless almost to a fault, he was imposed upon by a

false title of land for a Norwegian colony in Pennsylvania; charges for

litigation were added; he had intended to buy a ship to transport the

colonists at his own expense,—and out of pocket hundreds of thousands of

dollars, he became poor, sick, and subject to arrest. He said, “I shall

pursue the swindlers;” then, reflecting, he remarked: “That is not

according to the Master’s precept, but if I kiss my enemy what have I

left for my friend?” “My friends,” he said, “will never defraud me, for

they know I am theirs.” “I am not content,” he told me, “with the golden

rule, for I cannot expect others to do to me as I do to them.” He was

not a professor of Christianity or of religion in any form. He informed

me he got such a shock and revulsion from the doctrines he heard

preached in his youth that he was permanently alienated from going to

church; but so much the worse for the Christians if they reject and

excommunicate him. He said to me: “They showed me so many statues and

images, coarse or blood–colored, in Italy, it made me sick and I wanted

to see a cow!” Why, I inquired of him, do the manufacturers of violins

not illustrate the law of evolution, and make as good instruments at

least as Stradivarius, Amati, and Gaspar da Salo? “Because,” he

answered, “they do not consider it a holy mission.” Earnest in his

nature, like the hot geysers of the North, he was as winsome in his

manners as any prince of the East; and, I doubt not, a true test would

detect blood of the Orient in his veins, as he said he learned from

Italy what it is to sing. Yet Norway, says Björnson, gave to his music

its theme or ground, and well does Henrik Wergeland make Norway herself

sing to him.

We must, he one day told me, see our fellow’s errors and sins, but often

“not say what we see,” putting his long forefinger on his lips as he

spoke. He graciously insinuated, rather than bluntly asserted, what he

thought. At the Chestnut Street club he made a marvelous speech, in

which he praised the curvilinear instead of direct style of the Spanish

tongue. He preferred suggestion to proposition, as do all the likewise

finely–strung. But, although he had no dogmas to offer, never lived one

who accredited more the being of God and immortality of the soul, and

the immense superiority of unseen supernal forces to the seen. Thus he

lived an ideal life, free from mercenary aims, so charming and

enchanting men that his name became a household word, and the great

manager in any city had to spend little time or means advertising him,

if it were in the air that the magician would come....

Honor, then, in this sacred place, to the man and artist, Ole Bull. He

held a sublime and tricksy, yet utterly simple bow. If he lifted us,

round after round, to heaven, he could lower us, too, with his

art, gently and safely to the ground.... He displayed wondrous

tone–gyrations, and never, as with a wooden rule, drew mechanical

parallel lines. He was a troubadour with his shell. When, like a

merryman, he made us laugh, the expression of his face showed his soul

still aloft. He was no materialist or sensualist, but a spiritualist in

the deepest sense. I judge of men by their treatment of women; and how

refined and grand his bearing was to the sex is well known in every

country our strange and singular fascinator visited....

I have missed the portrait, I meant, if a facsimile could be furnished

of it for any other man. We sometimes say of a man he was a paragon,

gem, “one entire and perfect chrysolite.” _Jean Paul Richter the only_,

the Germans say. My subject to–day is unique. There never on earth will

be another Ole Bull. He was the diamond called solitaire. The Jews were

mistaken when, in the new teacher, they thought Elias or one of the old

prophets had come again. God does not repeat himself; genius is a fresh

revelation, and never, in just the same form, descends. Speaking as in

the presence of those to whom companionship, country, and kindred blood

endeared this man of transcendent stature, yet with none of our

occidental stiffness, so lowly and familiar that he wanted once with a

friend to leave the chairs and get down on the floor to converse, I

should be bankrupt if at least in this paper money I did not try to pay

my debt. Seventy years of age; the Scripture term was his prime. He died

young in heart and hope, and friend and housemate declare they cannot

think and do not know him dead, as the tropical sun, suddenly setting,

is not quenched, though leaving all dark behind. Aspiring and

proceeding, despite his gray locks, he seemed an undeveloped child.

Nothing in his mental constitution was fixed or had grown hard. He had

not subsided from the gush and sparkle of life into the sediment of a

form or stalagmite of a creed. The crystallization went on unfinished in

the upper chambers of his soul, and had no cavern like the stalactites

of the mine in which to drop. No decay gave hint of an end. There is

sickness, death, but no end. He grew, advanced, never stopped, nor did

the sutures, even at seventy, quite close over that busy brain. “To have

to work so at my age!” said the French painter, Thomas Couture; but Ole

Bull said, “I should vegetate without new engagements to fulfill.” He so

lived, therefore, as to convince us of immortality. I know not of what

sovereign or captain from the North, the hill–country of Judæa, Isaiah

wrote; but when I think how majestic and gentle was this head man and

leader from our modern Norway, I give him the tribute of my text, as one

might salute a born deliverer and true king.

FROM REV. DR. A. McKENZIE’S SERMON ON THANKSGIVING DAY, 1880.

From these men of our own Commonwealth let me turn to a man of another

land, whose venerable and stately presence has been often seen in our

streets; who has been the citizen of many climes, making his name a

familiar word, and filling the air with melody; a man who stood before

kings and held them in wondering silence by the witchery of his fingers,

and the harmony of his thoughts; who drew the souls of men after him by

the sound of the mystic strings he touched. He made to himself a great

renown, the music and the man; both were honored, both were loved. Now

the hands have lost their cunning, and the good, gray head is seen no

more. Yet will he keep his place with all who knew him. It was among his

own people that he was greatest and best. He loved his country, its men

and women, its mountains and valleys, its rivers and lakes, its history

and its hope. He carried it with him where he went. He sought its honor

and toiled for its welfare. Loyal and loving, he wore its name upon his

brow. When he stood as one entranced, his tall form swaying to and fro,

his eye gazing far away, and the utter stillness was scarcely broken by

the sweet, weird strains which floated into it, it was the heart of

Norway we saw and heard, incarnate in her son, beating, breathing,

singing in his spirit.

When he lay wearied and dying in his island–home Norway grew still.

Spacious and comely was the room which he had made for song, where the

singer rested; but the land which mourned was wider.

He heard the requiem there, but the land was to be full of requiem.

From off the quiet waters came the tribute of admiring minstrelsy, which

long will be repeated.

When he was gone, royalty and humanity hastened with their homage to his

memory. The great city begged for his honored form to give it choicest

burial. It lay in state in his own house. It was borne in grand

procession to the distant shore. The walks were strewed with living

green. The people wept and praised. His trophies went before him, but

the stricken hearts of men were on every side of him. The eloquent words

of friendship and reverence were spoken. He found his resting–place

among the great, on a spot which had been kept for a king—which had

found a king.

And he wore no royalty but his great manhood.

Why this honor to a man? Because he had dealt well by the land. He had

given it good and glory, and the gift returned. Norway loved him because

he loved Norway.

Ole Bull: A Memoir · 第 126 / 136 题