THE ORIGIN OF THE VIOLIN.

The country which affords us the most ancient memorials of a perfect

language, of an advanced civilization, of a philosophy in which

all phases of human thought find expression, of a poetry rich

in every style, and of a musical art corresponding with the lively

susceptibilities of the people—India—appears to have given birth to bow

instruments.

Classical antiquity, in its forms of sculpture and bas–relief, contains

no suggestion of the instrument. A little figure of Apollo playing upon

a kind of violin with something like a bow, exhibited in Florence, has

been proved to be of modern production. This is the only known piece of

sculpture reputed ancient, in which anything like a bow can be found.

Ancient painting, while giving many delineations of musical instruments,

in every case fails to represent that indispensable adjunct of the

violin proper,—the bow.

As to India, no conjecture based on obscure interpretation of record or

delineation is needed, for the veritable instruments exist to–day,

preserving, in the main, their original characteristics. The first or

simplest form of bow instrument seems to have consisted of a little

hollow cylinder of wood covered at one end with a piece of skin tightly

stretched, and furnished with a neck and bridge, the whole being very

much like a modern banjo. A slip of bamboo, bent so as to hold tense a

bundle of hairs, furnished the bow. The number of strings was variable,

according to the purpose of the instrument. Thus, in the case of the

virtuoso, one string was deemed sufficient, while for the uses of the

common people two or three were permitted. The antiquity claimed by

Indian writers for this form of bow instrument is almost incredible; one

tradition relates that it was invented by one of the early kings of

Ceylon, at a period about five thousand years before the Christian era.

In that dawn of history the migratory tides flowing from the East to the

West, from India through Asia, Persia, Arabia, thence through northern

Europe, and thence across the Danube and the Rhine, have left other

memorials than the stormy history of their wars. The polite arts of

to–day find their crude germs in that ancient time. And although, by the

ready interchange of ideas achieved by modern civilization, a modern

invention may embody suggestions gathered from all countries and all

times, it is possible to examine each component part, to follow up each

relative train of thought which has here found practical expression,

until we arrive at the single idea, the main–spring, as it were, of the

whole mechanism. In music the violin may be traced back through a

thousand varied forms until it finds its beginning in the _revanastron_,

or, as I have called it, the banjo–fiddle of India. At the time of its

invention, it was undoubtedly designed for nothing higher than an

accompaniment to the voice. As such it exists to–day in parts of India

and Arabia, and in such menial capacity it was retained until about the

12th century. In fact, bow instruments did not come into special notice

in Europe until about the 13th or 14th century.

At that time the natural divisions of the human voice, long recognized,

were definitely classed into soprano, tenor, alto, and bass; and music

began to be considered in the true dignity of its position as an art to

be scientifically cultivated. With the scientific division of the voice,

bow instruments became at once similarly divided into their four

registers. The form of instruments was still arbitrary; the number of

strings and manner of tuning varied with every new caprice; but the

instrumental combinations of that day contained the nucleus of the

modern quartette.

Still, despite the progressive steps and more popular diffusion of

musical knowledge, the instruments of the violin family at that time,

and for a period of nearly two centuries, held but a precarious tenure

of existence in the rivalry with the more robust fellow–members of the

orchestra; for the musical susceptibilities of the people appear to have

been more cordially appealed to and drawn out by the sonorous blasts of

the brazen trumpet and the artillery of the kettle–drum, than by the

sweet and subdued tones of the bow instruments of the day.

It is related that King Henry the Eighth of England, in the year 1530,

was entertained at Cardinal Wolsey’s palace with “a concert of drums and

fifes.” This is nothing compared with the heroic endurance of his

daughter Elizabeth, who was “daily regaled during dinner with twelve

trumpets, two kettle–drums, which, together with fifes, cornets, and

side–drums, made the hall ring for half an hour together.”

Between the latter part of the 15th century and the first half of the

16th, the instruments of the viol family, with the introduction of the

_viol d’amour_ and the _viol di gamba_, reached the terminus of their

servitude as appendages to the voice, and at one step culminated in the

invention of the violin as we have it to–day. The new curvatures of the

top and back; the deep indentures of the sides for convenience of the

bow; the sweep of the outline; the scroll; the removal of the frets on

the finger–board,—an ancient distinguishing feature, perpetuated in the

arrangement of the neck of the guitar,—all these innovations upon

established conventionality seem to have been made at once. Since that

time the violin has steadily, and without retrogression, advanced to its

present position in popular estimation,—the aristocrat of musical

instruments. Laboring under difficulties not encountered by the voice,

it is yet capable of presenting a rhythmic musical picture, which the

mind can take up and at once translate to the feelings in intelligible

language.

Ole Bull: A Memoir · 第 86 / 136 题