Before the door of one of these houses, built of stone in the year 1793,

a carriage stopped. This carriage, lately built in a Boston workshop, was

the first seen in Tennessee, and had been followed, on the latter part

of its journey, by a large and motley company, constantly reinforced by

recruits, all anxious to see this wonderful structure on wheels, with

postillions, and drawn by four horses, reach its destination.

When the carriage stopped there was a general halt. A black footman,

descending from a seat on the box, solemnly opened the door, and Sir

Peyton Skipwith, the owner of the “Rock House,” and the thousand acres

surrounding it, descended from the carriage and assisted a young and

elegant woman to alight. This was unexpected, and a slight cheer went up

from the curious onlookers. To this the new land proprietor and his fair

companion gravely responded with a bow, and with a lingering glance at

the setting sun and the broad acres of their new domain, they entered the

house, and the happiness of Sir Peyton Skipwith and his bride was only to

be surmised by the outside world.

This outside world, a new settlement with the newspaper from the “Mother

State” a month old, and languishing to hear the latest fashion in

kerchief and stomacher, and the news of Mr. Washington’s re-election,

naturally took an absorbing interest in the latest acquisition to their

society; but with the exception of an occasional courteous word from

Sir Peyton, and a smile and bow from Lady Cornelia’s carriage, their

curiosity concerning the newcomers received no encouragement. The young

couple were probably too much absorbed in each other to be properly

benevolent, and public interest was beginning to wane when a rumor was

circulated that excited a thrill in all.

Built on Sir Peyton’s ground was a small church where the early

settlers met to unite in divine worship. As they passed to and fro on

these pious pilgrimages—the rumors were conflicting, but one fact was

unanimously declared—each evening, when the darkness came on, wonderful

and mysterious sounds were heard to issue from the brilliantly illumined

windows of the “Rock House.” The music (for such it seemed to be) was

said to have a most disquieting effect upon those who heard it; even the

reverend pastor, Dr. McGinty himself, was seen to stop on his way and

take most unseemly steps for one of his age and godly calling.

Such a state of affairs would never do! All concurred in one opinion,

that the matter should be investigated, and a committee of church members

appointed to make known to the public the nature of these profane sounds

that were so disquieting to the God-fearing flock of Zion Church. It

seemed most proper that an explanation should be demanded of “Mr. Peyton

Skipwith and Mistress Cornelia, his wife (titles were abolished as

savoring of earthly pride and not consistent with republican teaching).”

This course having been adopted and not found satisfactory, it was

agreed that on a certain evening the secret committee, composed of grave

and reverend Presbyters, should conceal themselves beneath Sir Peyton

Skipwith’s open windows, and I will try and describe what they saw.

Seated at an instrument somewhat like our modern piano, with small

spindle legs and white, shining ivory keys, sat Sir Peyton’s bride. The

light from innumerable silver candelabra fell upon the coils of her fair

hair and the silk of her gown and delicate laces, while Sir Peyton, his

tall form attired in full evening costume, with silk hose, knee buckles

of brilliants and low dancing shoes, turned pages from which she seemed

to play. Her white, jeweled fingers ran over the keys of the instrument,

and brought forth sounds so delicious, so entrancing that the world

seemed to be floating off in melody, and the church committee, secreted

beneath the open window, held their breath in rapt wonder, but this was

not all; for next, looking up into Sir Peyton’s eyes, she sang in a voice

like a flute:

“My ain laddie is a sodger boy;

Oh, I will cast off my gay, costly gown,

And follow him on from town to town,

And I will sell the kaims from my hair,

And follow my true love for e’er mair.”

As her voice died away a lady seated in the shadow, whom those watching

had not before noticed, dressed in a pale silk gown and lace cap and

kerchief, took her seat at the instrument, and Lady Cornelia, standing

up, gaily threw her silk petticoat over her arm and made a deep courtesy

to Sir Peyton, who stood opposite, bowing to the ground. Then they began

to dance. The music had changed now, and the church delegation began to

shuffle their feet uneasily, and take quick uncertain steps until—“Tell

it not in Gath,” for the oak that over-shadowed Sir Peyton’s doorway

alone was the witness—these staid, silent church members began to bow and

curtsy and pirouette in the moonlight beneath Sir Peyton’s window, while

inside the house, with the light from the candelabra falling on their

silk and jewels, Sir Peyton and his lady swept up and down the polished

floor in the stately figures of the minuet. As the music continued, the

dancers seemed to gain fresh inspiration, but at last, like a knight

of old, Sir Peyton kissed his lady’s hand, the lights went out in the

“Rock House,” and the church delegation, with exhilarated but somewhat

sheepish countenances, parted company and wended their ways to their

respective homes.

Not many days after this occurrence the following report was submitted

with much solemnity to the pastor and presiding elders of Zion Church:

“Dr. McGinty and Reverend Sirs: Being appointed by ye reverend

gentlemen to investigate certain musick not consistent with ye

pious teachings of ye church, said committee will state that

they found this music in their own minds most conducive to deep

religious meditations, and much sobriety of thought and action.

“Howsoever, said committee advises ye congregation not to

linger in ye pathway near ye seats of ye mighty in high places,

for ye machinations of ye evil one are past ye understanding of

man.

“Respectfully submitted.

“JONAS FRAME,

“OBADIAH DILLWEED,

“KESIAH TROTTER.”

Notwithstanding this caution to Dr. McGinty’s flock, they were still wont

to linger near the “Rock House” and listen, until one night there was

no light to be seen, nor sound issued from the darkened windows. Lord

Peyton’s horse had returned riderless, and his lifeless body was found

near a trysting place where he and Lady Cornelia were wont to meet.

The “Rock House” was closed now, and Lady Cornelia traveled in foreign

lands. Years passed, and once more sounds of music, plaintive now, were

heard—but these also ceased in time, and the house passed into other

hands.

And now, nearly a hundred years after, with the generations that it has

sheltered sleeping a dreamless sleep near by, this old house alone seems

to preserve its pristine youth.

Once again it is occupied by a young couple, and the music that now

floats from the open windows is that of childish laughter. But on one

occasion the children grow serious, when they are trying to spell the

name cut in the rock on which the house is built, and as with chubby

fingers they point out and spell L-a-d-y C-o-r-n-e-l-i-a S-k-i-p-w-i-t-h,

one older than the rest, holding up a warning finger, tells them to

“Listen!” Do you not hear Lady Cornelia’s spinet? She is singing:

“My ain laddie was a sodger boy;

And I will sell the kaims from my hair.

And follow my true love for e’er mair.”

And then they all listened, and—who can tell? We all know that the

refrain in Lady Cornelia’s song will never pass away—that love is the

secret spring of perennial youth, and will be with us until time is no

more.

With Our Writers

John Trotwood Moore, Esq.

Wilmar, Minn., Feb. 17, 1906.

Sir: Two copies of Trotwood’s Monthly have been sent me, and I greatly

enjoyed the well-chosen, readable articles, and think there must surely

be a field for such a magazine.

In “Educating the Horse,” you give a much-needed warning against the

abuse of the checkrein, and the following is written in the hope that

so great a lover of horses as your article shows you to be may pick up

a real sharp-pointed pen and with black ink give somebody a well-meant,

gentlemanly roasting. Like your monthly, it is dedicated to the horse.

The name of Jackson is greatly revered by the American people, and

deservedly so; for there have been distinguished soldiers, statesmen,

horsemen and whole-souled Southern gentlemen among the Jacksons, but

there was one of that name who, I think, ought to have his effigy placed

in front of every judge’s stand at every racecourse of the nation. This

particular one is the Mr. Jackson who invented that rotten abomination

called the Jackson, but now called the overdraw checkrein.

I think not one sound reason can be given for its use, not even on the

score of ornament, and twenty could be given against it. It is as cruel

as the “scavenger’s daughter,” which the guides will show you in the

torture chamber in the Tower of London, and works on the same principle,

and is kin to the diabolical contrivance so graphically described by

Charles Reade in his inimitable novel, “It Is Never Too Late to Mend,”

and again works on the same principle.

Some of the best horsemen, the most carelessly careful drivers, and

the best horses are to be found in the coaching clubs in large cities,

particularly in New York.

Do you suppose there is money enough in all New York City to induce one

of those men to use that check to drive a coach load of people down

Broadway at a busy time, or up and down the Adirondacks or Catskills,

where close driving and short, quick turning are wanted? Not much, and he

does not like spoiling his horses’ necks and legs; besides he wants them

to plunge into their collars at a word.

The only two lines that can be effectively used against it, I think, are

fashion and ridicule. Make its use “bad form,” and guy it into the ground.

Every user of that check rein ought to memorize some of the sublime lines

of Shakespeare. Anyhow, every time he checks a horse up he ought to

repeat that immortal speech of Dogberry.

GEORGE MADDISON.

[We thank Mr. Maddison and heartily agree with him.—Ed.]

* * * * *

Editor Trotwood’s:

In your March issue, reprinting the familiar poem, “The Old Canoe,” which

the anthology-makers so persistently ascribe to the late Gen. Albert

Pike, you say: “Like many other good poems, it was, perhaps, the only one

some poet wrote, and, never thinking it would be immortal, or that it had

any special merit, failed to sign his name to it.... Its authorship has

never before, perhaps, been publicly corrected.”

Both these statements are erroneous.

Nine years ago, when Miss Jennie Thornley Clarke’s “Songs of the South”

was published, it contained this poem, marked “anonymous.” As I chanced

to know its real authorship, and hence knew that it lacked several

hundreds of miles, geographically speaking, of being a “song of the

South,” I sent a communication to the New York Critic, which was printed

in its issue of March 13, 1897, giving the facts. I have several times

since publicly corrected the statement that General Pike was the author

of the poem. The actual author was Miss Emily Rebecca Page, who was born

in Bradford, Vt., in 1834, and died in Chelsea, Mass., in 1862. “The

Old Canoe” was written in 1849, and appeared in the Portland Transcript

in that year. It was not by any means “the only one the poet wrote.”

Miss Page was a voluminous writer of both verse and prose, having been

a constant contributor to many New England periodicals. She was later

assistant editor of “Gleason’s Pictorial” and “The Flag of Our Union,”

two Boston literary publications which were very popular forty or fifty

years ago. She also published several volumes of poetry.

R. L. C. WHITE.

Nashville, February 26, 1906.

[We knew there must be a history for this poem, and we thank Dr. White

for his letter.—Ed.]

* * * * *

Editor Trotwood:

Old Tom’s body lies mouldering in the grave, but his spirit goes pacing

on. The gifted pen of the good man, Col. Frank Buford, calls attention

to the fact that the sacred dust of the grandest and noblest old Roman

is being disturbed. The evergreen of the old tree which marked the

revered spot has withered and gone. The Colonel’s item in Trotwood’s

jewel case carries us back to a great day in the history of the horse.

That the passing of old Tom Hal No. 1 marked a distinct epoch in the

equine history of the world may seem a far-fetched statement, but

where on the face of the earth is there record, in horse lore, of a

greater achievement? Bought by the gallant Capt. Thos. Gibson as a

stable companion to the great John Dillard, Jr. (Gibson’s), for the

sole purpose of production and betterment of the army of fine saddle

horses of the “middle basin,” in good old Tennessee, he grandly served

the purpose, for who that has had a “Hal” mount, on a typical Tennessee

spring morning, for a ten-mile spin on its fine roadways, over hill

and down valley, by babbling brook, has failed to thank God for life,

liberty and the capture of happiness on that particular horse. He had

populated the fields with a family of superb saddlers, and made greatest

achievement of the day as a sire of speed, for “Little Brown Jug,” as the

fore pacer of old Tom’s coming family and fame as a sire of the greatest

race horses, set the stride, to be bettered by the immortal Hal Pointer

2:04½, who hauled the grim-visaged, silent old warrior to victory in

hundreds of hard-fought battles, and the other “Pointer,” blazoned on

the course “1:59¼,” a race record not to be rivaled by any other blood.

And so, when as a progenitor of size, and beauty, and intelligence, and

speed, and stamina, and saddle, and all purpose qualities old Tom had

distanced the best hopes of his early admirers, and was gathered to his

fathers, his hoofs beat a tattoo down the gold-paved streets leading

to St. Peter’s beautiful stables. And the sir knight who drew his rein

at the door announced to St. Peter, “Old Tom Hal, Jr., No. 16934, from

Tennessee!” and St. Peter looked sad as he said: “I know him not by that

cognomen. Take him away. He bears the dub title given by the arch foe of

his race of pacers. Clean him of his saddle and cloth, bridle and dub;

groom him and clothe him in new purple and gold, and place on his saddle

skirt his proper title, viz., ‘Old Tom Hal No. 1,’ and return and ask Ed

Geers to ask ‘Old Wash’ to give him the first box stall to the right, and

care well for him. The bin of clipped golden oaks is for him, and you,

for having the temerity to bring this King here with such a dub title,

will go to outer darkness for sixty days.” And it was done.

The funeral of old Tom Hal No. 1 was celebrated at the beautiful mansion

place of the famed Bufords, near Buford’s Station, Giles County, Tenn.,

and when the thousands from forty miles around, and mourners from Ohio

who came to do honor had tethered their saddle steeds in the great open

timber, one could well imagine that the brilliant legion of the immortal

“Wheeler” had camped close on our trail. There were hundreds of sons,

daughters, grandsons and daughters and nephews and close kin to old

Tom Hal there, with moistened eyes and somber mien, as the band played

the dirge. The “silent Wheeler” of the harness brigade was there, with

the incomparable “Pointer,” 2:04½ as chief mourners, came in a special

coach, but there was not time for Pointer’s mourning compatriot to

deliver a eulogy. His was the still grief of one who mourns, but cannot

weep. All the good people of Maury, Giles, Williamson and adjoining

counties were there. The woods seemed full of the cavalry of peace.

Cannons of war had been molded into ploughshares, and swords had been

fashioned into blacksmith’s pruning knives, and after the time for music

and oration, there was a time for feasting, and then the assembled

multitude witnessed, not a miracle as to loaves and fishes, but a master

demonstration of the measureless, distinctive Southern hospitality

(which has to be born Southern to be operative, and seen and realized

to be appreciated) of Colonel Buford, on whose estate the funeral was

held. People had heard of barbecues, but some of us had never before

sniffed the enticing odors of meats thus baked, while our stomachs were

collapsed. Trenches some hundreds of feet long, and three feet wide,

were filled with live coals, embers of burning firewood, and across

these trenches, on green poles, lay wired the fresh sacrifices of lamb

and shoat, burnt offerings to the god of the race course, cut in half

lengthwise, and these poles (in the brawny hands of the dark-skinned,

faithful tillers, the salvation of the people in past time of peril,

and the necessity of the future for the development of the wonderful

Southland’s broad acres), so frequently turned as to insure a beautiful

bake. Suffice it to say the meat and bread and coffee went the whole

rounds with the great multitude, and there were many more than the

“twelve baskets” after all the people were fed. And while old Tom’s

spirit will go pacing on, his name, and his fame briefly, should be

carved on a native granite boulder of as many tons weight as can be moved

to a conspicuous place in the public square at Columbia, or some other

public center, where time or change of ownership would not interfere, as

the generations pass. I will be glad to aid such movement.

E. Z. STRIDE.

Cleveland, O., March 1, 1906.

The Old Cotton Gin

[There have been so many requests for copies of this poem that it is

reproduced. It has been adopted in all the public schools of Alabama and

recited on Alabama Day, December 14, each year.—E. E. Sweetland.]

It lies alone in the rank June corn,

A relic of days that are numbered and gone;

The June wind sings a song in its throat,

The June clouds lovingly over it float,

And through its skeleton ribs of steel

The moth-flies dance in a drowsy reel.

For its saws are rust

With canker and crust,

They hum no more from dawn to dusk—

And the lizard is ginner,

And out and in,

The spider is spinner

At the Old Cotton Gin.

Ay, many a day for the old, old South,

He spun his fleece from a fiery mouth,

And wove his woof in a fabric of gold—

As a picture is painted, a tale that is told.

And he sat in his might, this fallen thing,

A hoary monarch, an uncrowned king,

And over the land

With an iron hand,

He flung his wealth with a gesture grand,

And Might was the ginner—

Of barn and of bin

There was never a winner

Like the Old Cotton Gin.

Broad was the kingdom he ruled in his might,

Brave were the armies he rallied for fight,

Bright were the wings of his ships on the seas,

Bold were his merchantmen—kingly his ease.

True were his women in hut or in hall,

Sweet the soft sunshine that fell over all.

From banjo and bow

And the cotton’s long row,

Free-song and slave-song would mingle and flow.

And Pride was the ginner—

(Unpardonable sin!)

Was there ever a sinner

Like the Old Cotton Gin?

Alas, for his weavings—ay, tears for the day

When out from his loom came the jackets of gray,

And the locks that were plucked in despair from his head

Were woven to crimson in shrouds for his dead.

They died for the Sin the centuries had given,

And their blood is the pledge on the lintels of heaven.

By river and plain

They march not again,

And wet was his fleece with the blood of his slain—

For Death was the ginner—

And Riot and Din—

And Sorrow the spinner,

At the Old Cotton Gin.

He buried his dead, and a tenderer tone

Crept into his song, for he sang it alone;

But he wove as he sang and the pattern was bright—

The tapestry of stars that come with the night—

And he built his waste places and conquered by toil

And garnered in peace what was gathered in spoil,

And all the day long

He wove in his song

The patience of right in the pillage of wrong—

And Faith was the ginner,

The fabric to spin,

And Hope was the spinner

At the Old Cotton Gin.

With his Hope in the future, his Heart in the past,

He worked for his people and wove to the last;

And, tottering, he stood through the rift and the reel

And he died as he lived—with his hand on the wheel,

And sighing, his soul passed peacefully through,

As pure as the last lock of lint in the flue.

The Heart, whose beat

Was the Century’s feet,

Was willing to cease, but not to retreat.

And the New South was ginner,

The New Age was in,

The New Century spinner—

A New Cotton Gin.

Rear him—O sons of a generous sire—

Aloft on a monument, not on a pyre;

Base-stone of valor, column of youth,

Shaft-stone of chivalry, cap-stone of truth—

Honor him, sons of a land that is fair,

Let him not lie in the rank weeds there,

For see! from his night

He rises all bright,

He wakens! He wakens—a loom of new light—

With Fame for his ginner,

His kith and his kin,

And the world is the winner

In the Old Cotton Gin.

JOHN TROTWOOD MOORE.

TROTWOOD’S MONTHLY

Devoted to Farm, Horse and Home.

TROTWOOD PUBLISHING CO., Nashville, Tenn.

Office 150 Fourth Ave., North.

JOHN TROTWOOD MOORE,

Editor-in-Chief.

E. E. SWEETLAND Business Manager.

GEO. E. McKENNON President.

JOHN W. FRY Vice-President.

EUGENE ANDERSON Treas.

WOOTEN MOORE Sec’y.

TERMS OF SUBSCRIPTION: One Year, $1.00; Single Copy, 10 cents.

Advertising Rates on application.

NASHVILLE, TENN., APRIL, 1906.

With Trotwood

SPRING.

Lo, a faint blush runs trembling along

Through the air,

And the soul of the thrush bursts full into song

Everywhere.

There’s a throbbing and pulsing—the birth of a bloom—

Uplifting of purpose—out-shutting of gloom—

A radiancy rising of song and perfume—

And of prayer.

O listlessness sweet—O yearnings that spread

All about—

(As memories that meet in the eyes of the dead

Long shut out—)

There’s an infinite longing, a gleam and a glow

Of sapphire above and emerald below,

A bursting of buds, a melting of snow—

And of doubt.

—John Trotwood Moore.

* * * * *

Trotwood’s Department this month will discuss the old-time negro,

chiefly, all brought about by a correspondent who writes asking that he

discuss it.

The old-time darky is sui generis, and I sometimes fear his race is

almost extinct. The modern darky is no more like his ancestors, so far

as individuality is concerned, than the Greek of to-day resembles those

who fought around the walls of Troy. In other words, the modern Negro has

“caught on,” and there is now little difference between him, save in the

eternal negro that is in him, and any other class that he happens to run

with. The Negro of to-day may be divided into two great classes; he is

either a “nigger” or a “coon,” a vagabond, a shiftless, worthless fellow,

who lives to-day and lets to-morrow take care of itself; or else he is a

school teacher, a preacher, a fairly good mechanic, a good farm hand and

a peaceable, inoffensive citizen who will bear uncomplainingly injustices

under which a white race would rush to arms. These two classes make up

the Negro race, and between them they have managed to eliminate the

old-time darky we used to know and love. Out of a thousand darkies of the

present day, perhaps one old-time darky may be found; but even he may not

be found fit for character study. My observation is that it is extremely

rare to find one who gives us any idea upon which to build a story or a

poem.

* * * * *

The fact is, darky stories are always nine-tenths white and one-tenth

Negro. They are nine-tenths art, as most good stories are, and one-tenth

nature; but all so nicely blended that the art—as all real art is—is

concealed in the colors of the natural. And yet these stories are true to

nature—in fact so natural that we fail to see where the natural ceases

and the art begins. The darky who told about “Marse Chan” was the same

who told of “Unk Eden’ro and Meh Lady.” They are all a clever white man

who knows the darky as a mariner knows the sea, imitating the darky and

making for him a story. Joel Chandler Harris was wiser in making one

darky—Uncle Remus—tell all of his, and they therefore sound more natural.

He was also wise in selecting the nursery yarns of “Brer Rabbit” and

“Brer Fox,” for in telling them the darky is at his best. On the whole,

I expect that Harris is the greater interpreter of the two, but this

need not necessarily follow, because the Virginia and the Georgia darky

differ very much in dialect just as the Tennessee darky differs from

either of the others. Especially is this true of the Middle Tennessee

darky who happened to belong to the wealthier class of white people. For

every Negro is a born imitator.

* * * * *

Trotwood's Monthly, Vol. II, No. 1, April, 1906 · 第 5 / 6 段