CHAPTER XVI.

HOW THE TELEPHONE TALKS.

Everybody knows what the telephone is because it is in almost every

man's house. But while everybody knows what it is, there are very few

(comparatively speaking) that know how it works. If you remember what

has been said about sound and electromagnetism it will not be hard to

understand.

When any one utters a spoken word the air is thrown into shivers or

vibrations of a peculiar form, and every different sound has a different

form. Therefore, every articulate word differs from every other word,

not only as a shape in the air, but as a sensation in the brain, where

the air-vibrations have been conducted through the organ of hearing;

otherwise we could not distinguish between one word and another. Every

different word produces a different sensation because there is a

physical difference, as a shape or motion, in the air where it is

uttered. If one word contains 1000 simultaneous air-motions and another

1500 you can see that there is a physical or mechanical difference in

the air.

The construction of the simplest form of telephone is as follows: Take a

piece of iron rod one-half or three-quarters of an inch long and

one-quarter inch thick, and after putting a spool-head on each end to

hold the wire in place wind it full of fine insulated copper wire;

fasten the end of this spool to the end of a straight-bar permanent

magnet. Then put the whole into a suitable frame, and mount a thin

circular diaphragm (membrane or plate) of iron or steel, held by its

edges, so that the free end of the spool will come near to but not touch

the center of the diaphragm. This diaphragm must be held rigidly at the

edges.

Now if the two ends of the insulated copper wires are brought out to

suitable binding-screws the instrument is done.

The permanent steel magnet serves a double purpose. When the telephone

was first used commercially, the instrument now used as a receiver was

also used as a transmitter. As a transmitter it is a dynamo-electric

machine. Every time the iron diaphragm is moved in the magnetic field of

the pole of the permanent magnet, which in this case is the free end of

the spool (the iron of the spool being magnetic by contact with the

permanent magnet), there is a current set up in the wire wound on the

spool; a short impulse, lasting only as long as the movement lasts. The

intensity of the impulse will depend upon the amplitude and quickness

of the movement of the diaphragm. If there is a long movement there will

be a strong current and vice versa. If a sound is uttered, and even if

the multitude of sounds that are required to form a word, be spoken to

the diaphragm, the latter partakes in kind of the air-motions that

strike it. It swings or vibrates in the air, and if it is a perfect

diaphragm it moves exactly as the air does, both as to amplitude and

complexity of movement. You will remember that in the chapter on

sound-quality (Vol. II) it was said that there were hundreds and

sometimes thousands of superposed motions in the tones of some voices

that gave them the element we call quality.

All these complex motions are communicated by the air to the diaphragm,

and the diaphragm sets up electric currents in the wire wound on the

spool, corresponding exactly in number and form, so that the current is

molded exactly as the air-waves are. Now, if we connect another

telephone in the circuit, and talk to one of them, the diaphragm of the

other will be vibrated by the electric current sent, and caused to move

in sympathy with it and make exactly the same motions relatively, both

as to number and amplitude.

It will be plain that if the receiving diaphragm is making the same

motions as the transmitting diaphragm, it will put the air in the same

kind of motion that the air is in at the transmitting end, and will

produce the same sensation when sensed by the brain through the ear. If

the air-motion is that of any spoken word it will be the same at both

ends of the line, except that it will not be so intense at the

receiving-end; it is the same relatively. And this is how the telephone

talks.

I have said that the permanent magnet had two functions. In the case of

the transmitter it is the medium through which mechanical is converted

into electrical energy. It corresponds to the field-magnet of the

dynamo, while the diaphragm corresponds to the revolving armature, and

the voice is the steam-engine that drives it. In the second place, it

puts a tension on the diaphragm and also puts the molecules of the iron

core of the magnet in a state of tension or magnetic strain, and in that

condition both the molecules and the diaphragm are much more sensitive

to the electric impulses sent over the wire from the transmitter. This

fact was experimented upon by the writer as far back as 1879 and

published in the Journal of the American Electrical Society. At the

present day this form of telephone is used only as a receiver.

Transmitters have been made in a variety of forms, but there are only

two generic methods of transmission. One is the magneto method--the one

we have described--and the other is effected by varying the resistance

of a battery current. The former will work without a battery, as the

voice acting on the wire around the magnet through the diaphragm creates

the current; in the latter the current is created by the battery but

molded by the voice. In the latter method the current passes through

carbon contacts that are moved by the diaphragm. Carbon is the best

substance, because it will bear a wider separation of contact without

actually breaking the current. When carbon points are separated that

have an electric current passing through them, there is an arc formed on

the same principle as the electric arc-light.

Great improvements in details have been made in the telephone since its

first use, but no new principles have been discovered as applied to

transmission.

We have spoken in another place regarding the various claimants to the

invention of the telephone, but here is one that has been overlooked. A

young man from the country was in a telegraph-office at one time and was

left alone while the operator went to dinner. Suddenly the sounder

started up and rattled away at such a rate that the countryman thought

something should be done. He leaned down close to the instrument and

shouted as loudly as possible these words: "The operator has gone to

dinner." From what we know now of the operation of the telephone I have

no doubt but that he transmitted his voice to some extent over the wire.

This young man's claims have never been put forward before, and we are

doing him tardy justice. But his claim is quite as good as many others

set forth by people who think they invent, whenever it occurs to them

that something new might possibly be done, if only somebody would do it.

And when that somebody does do it they lay claim to it.

In the early days of the telephone it was not supposed that a vocal

message could be transmitted to a very great distance. However, as time

went on and experiments were multiplied the distance to which one could

converse with another through a wire kept on increasing.

In these days, as every one knows, it is a daily occurrence that

business men converse with each other, telephonically, for a distance of

1000 miles or more; in fact, it is possible to transmit the voice

through a single circuit about as great a distance as it is possible to

practically telegraph. This leads us to speak of another telegraphic

apparatus which we have not heretofore mentioned, and that is the

telegraphic repeater. It is a common notion that messages are sent

through a single circuit across the continent, but this is not the

case, although the circuits are very much longer than they were some

years ago. The repeater is an instrument that repeats a message

automatically from one circuit to another. For instance, if Chicago is

sending a message to New York through two circuits, the division being

in Buffalo, the repeater will be located at Buffalo and under the

control of both the operator at Chicago and the operator in New York.

When Chicago is sending, one part of the repeater works in unison with

the Chicago key and is the key to the New York circuit, which begins at

Buffalo. When New York is sending the other part of the repeater

operates, which becomes a key which repeats the message to the Chicago

line. In this way the practical result is the same as though the circuit

were complete from New York to Chicago. At the present day some of the

copper wires and perhaps some of the larger iron wires are used direct

from Chicago to New York without repetition, but all messages between

New York and San Francisco are automatically repeated at least twice and

under certain conditions of weather oftener. I can remember that in wet

weather in the old days, with such wires as they had then (being No. 9

iron with bad joints, which gave the circuit a high resistance) that

these repeaters would be inserted at Toledo, Cleveland, Buffalo and

Albany in order to work from Chicago to New York. Under such conditions

the transmission would necessarily be slow, because an armature time

will be lost at each repeater. Regarding each repeater as a key, when

Chicago depresses his key the armature of the next repeater must act,

and then the next successively, and all of this takes time, although

only a small fraction of a second.

The repeater was a very delicate instrument and had to be handled by a

skilled operator. Every wire must be in its place or the instrument

would fail to operate. I remember on one occasion in Cleveland that

along in the middle of the night the repeater failed to work. The

operator knew nothing of the principle of its operation, so that when it

failed he had to appeal to some of his superiors.

At this time there was no one in the office who knew how to adjust it,

so they had to send up to the house of the superintendent and arouse him

from his sleep and bring him down to the office. He looked under the

table and found that one of the wires had loosened from its binding-post

and was hanging down. He said immediately, "Here's the trouble; I should

think you could have seen it yourself." The operator replied, "I did see

that, but I didn't think one wire would make any difference." He learned

the lesson that all electricians have had to learn--that even one wire

makes all the difference in the world. But this operator was no worse

in that respect than some of his superiors. One of the heads of the

Cleveland office at one time in the early days wanted to give some

directions to the office at Buffalo. He told the operator at the key to

tell Buffalo so and so, when the operator replied: "I can't do it;

Buffalo has his key open." The official immediately said with severity:

"Tell him to close it." He forgot that it would be as difficult for him

to tell him to close it, as it would have been to have sent the original

message.

But let us go back to the telephone. While it is possible to send a

message from New York to San Francisco by telegraph, it is not possible

to telephone that distance, because as yet no one has been able to

devise a repeater that will transfer spoken words from one line to

another satisfactorily. But unless the printer and publisher bestir

themselves some one may accomplish the feat before this little book

reaches the reader. If this proves to be true, let the writer be the

first to congratulate the successful inventor.

Electricity and Magnetism · 第 16 / 29 章