CHAPTER II.

HISTORY OF ELECTRICAL SCIENCE.

Electricity as a well-developed science is not old. Those of us who have

lived fifty years have seen nearly all its development so far as it has

been applied to useful purposes, and those who have lived over

twenty-five years have seen the major portion of its development.

Thales of Miletus, 600 B.C., discovered, or at least described, the

properties of amber when rubbed, showing that it had the power to

attract and repel light substances, such as straws, dry leaves, etc. And

from the Greek word for amber--elektron--came the name electricity,

denoting this peculiar property. Theophrastus and Pliny made the same

observations; the former about 321 B.C., and the latter about 70 A.D. It

is also said that the ancients had observed the effects of animal

electricity, such as that of the fish called the torpedo. Pliny and

Aristotle both speak of its power to paralyze the feet of men and

animals, and to first benumb the fish which it then preyed upon. It is

also recorded that a freed-man of Tiberius was cured of the gout by the

shocks of the torpedo. It is further recorded that Wolimer, the King of

the Goths, was able to emit sparks from his body.

Coming down to more modern times--A.D. 1600--we find Dr. Gilbert, an

Englishman, taking up the investigation of the electrical properties of

various substances when submitted to friction, and formulating them in

the order of their importance. In these experiments we have the

beginnings of what has since developed into a great science. He made the

discovery that when the air was dry he could soon electrify the

substances rubbed, but when it was damp it took much longer and

sometimes he failed altogether. In 1705 Francis Hawksbee, an

experimental philosopher, discovered that mercury could be rendered

luminous by agitating it in an exhausted receiver. (It is a question

whether this phenomenon should not be classed with that of

phosphorescence rather than electricity.) The number of investigators

was so great that all of them cannot be mentioned. It often happens that

those who do really most for a science are never known to fame. A number

of people will make small contributions till the structure has by

degrees assumed large proportions, when finally some one comes along and

puts a gilded dome on it and the whole structure takes his name. This is

eminently true of many of the more important developments in the

science and applications of electricity during the last twenty-five or

thirty years.

Following Hawksbee may be mentioned Stephen Gray, Sir Isaac Newton, Dr.

Wall, M. Dupay and others. Dupay discovered the two conditions of

electrical excitation known now as positive and negative conditions. In

1745 the Leyden jar was invented. It takes its name from the city of

Leyden, where its use was first discovered. It is a glass jar, coated

inside and out with tin-foil. The inside coating is connected with a

brass knob at the top, through which it can be charged with electricity.

The inner and outer coatings must not be continuous but insulated from

each other. The author's name is not known, but it is said that three

different persons invented it independently, to wit, a monk by the name

of Kleist, a man by the name of Cuneus, and Professor Muschenbroeck of

Leyden. This was an important invention, as it was the forerunner of our

own Franklin's discoveries and a necessary part of his outfit with which

he established the identity of lightning and electricity. Every American

schoolboy has heard, from Fourth of July orations, how "Franklin caught

the forked lightning from the clouds and tamed it and made it

subservient to the will of man." How my boyish soul used to be stirred

to its depths by this oratorical display of electrical fireworks!

Franklin had long entertained the idea that the lightning of the clouds

was identical with what is called frictional electricity, and he waited

long for a church spire to be erected in his adopted home, the Quaker

City, in order that he might make the test and settle the question. But

the Quakers did not believe in spires, and Franklin's patience had a

limit.

Franklin had the theory that most investigators had at that time, that

electricity was a fluid and that certain substances had the power to

hold it. There were two theories prevalent in those days--both fluid

theories. One theory was that there were two fluids, a positive and a

negative. Franklin held to the theory of a single fluid, and that the

phenomenon of electricity was present only when the balance or natural

amount of electricity was disturbed. According to this theory, a body

charged with positive electricity had an excessive amount, and, of

course, some other body somewhere else had less than nature had allotted

to it; hence it was charged with negative electricity. A Leyden jar, for

instance, having one of its coatings (say the inside) charged with

positive or + electricity, the other coating will be charged with

negative or - electricity. The former was only a name for an amount

above normal and the latter a name for a shortage or lack of the normal

amount.

As we have said, Franklin believed in the identity of lightning and

electricity, and he waited long for an opportunity to demonstrate his

theory. He had the Leyden jar, and now all he needed was to establish

some suitable connection between a thunder-cloud and the earth.

Previous to 1750 Franklin had written a paper in which he showed the

likeness between the lightning spark and that of frictional electricity.

He showed that both sparks move in crooked lines--as we see it in a

storm-cloud, that both strike the highest or nearest points, that both

inflame combustibles, fuse metals, render needles magnetic and destroy

animal life. All this did not definitely establish their identity in the

mind of Franklin, and he waited long for an opportunity, and finally,

finding that no one presented itself, he did what many men have had to

do in other matters; he made one.

In the month of June, 1752, tired of waiting for a steeple to be

erected, Franklin devised a plan that was much better and probably saved

the experiment from failure; for the steeple would probably not have

been high enough. He constructed a kite by making a cross of light cedar

rods, fastening the four ends to the four corners of a large silk

handkerchief. He fixed a loop to tie the kite string to and balanced it

with a tail, as boys do nowadays. He fixed a pointed wire to the upper

end of one of the cross sticks for a lightning-rod, and then waited for

a thunder-storm. When it came, with the help of his boy, he sent up the

kite. He tied a loop of silk ribbon on the end of the string next his

hand--as silk was known to be an insulator or non-conductor--and having

tied a key to the string he waited the result, standing within a door to

prevent the silk loop from getting wet and thus destroying its

insulating qualities. The cloud had nearly passed and he feared his long

waited for experiment had failed, when he noticed the loose fibers of

the string standing out in every direction, and saw that they were

attracted by the approach of his finger. The rain now wet the string and

made a better conductor of it. Soon he could draw sparks with his

knuckle from the key. He charged a Leyden jar with this electrical

current from the thunder-cloud, and performed all the experiments with

it that he had done with ordinary electricity, thus establishing the

identity of the two and confirming beyond a doubt what he had long

before believed was true. In after experiments Franklin found that

sometimes the electricity of the clouds was positive and at other times

negative. From this experiment Franklin conceived the idea of erecting

lightning-rods to protect buildings, which are used to this day.

The news spread all over Europe, not through the medium of electricity,

however, but as soon as sailing vessels and stage-coaches could carry

it. Many philosophers repeated the experiments and at least one man

sacrificed his life through his interest in the new discovery. In 1753

Professor Richman of St. Petersburg erected on his house a metal rod

which terminated in a Leyden jar in one of the rooms. On the 31st of May

he was attending a meeting of the Academy of Sciences. He heard a roll

of thunder and hurried home to watch his apparatus. He and one of the

assistants were watching the apparatus when a stroke of lightning came

down the rod and leaped to the professor's head. He was standing too

near it and was instantly killed.

Passing over many names of men who followed in the wake of Franklin we

come to the next era-making discovery, namely, that of galvanic

electricity. In the year 1790 an incident occurred in the household of

one Luigi Galvani, an Italian physician and anatomist, that led to a new

and important branch of electrical science. Galvani's wife was preparing

some frogs for soup, and having skinned them placed them on a table near

a newly charged electric machine. A scalpel was on the table and had

been in contact with the machine. She accidentally touched one of the

frogs to the point of the scalpel, when, lo! the frog kicked, and the

kick of that dead frog changed the whole face of electrical science. She

called her husband and he repeated the experiment, and also appropriated

the discovery as well, and he has had the credit of it ever since, when

really his wife made the discovery. Galvani supposed it to be animal

electricity and clung to that theory the rest of his life, making many

experiments and publishing their results; but the discovery led others

to solve the problem.

Alessandro Volta, a professor of natural philosophy at Pavia, Italy,

was, it must be said, the founder of the science of galvanic or voltaic

electricity. Stimulated by the discovery of Galvani he attributed the

action of the frog's muscles, not to animal electricity, but to some

chemical action between the metals that touched it. To prove his theory,

he constructed a pile made of alternate layers of zinc, copper, and a

cloth or pasteboard saturated in some saline solution. By repeating

these trios--copper, zinc, and the saturated cloth--he attained a pile

that would give a powerful shock. It is called the Voltaic Pile.

I have a clear idea of the construction of this form of pile, founded on

experience. It was my habit when a boy to make everything that I found

described, if it were possible. The bottom of my mother's wash-boiler

was copper, and just the thing to make the square plates of copper to

match the zinc ones, made from another piece of domestic furniture used

under the stove. I shocked my mother twice--first with the voltaic pile

that I had constructed, and again when she found out where the metal

plates came from. The sequel to all this was--but why dwell upon a

painful subject!

Galvanism and voltaic electricity are the same. Volta was the first to

construct what is termed the galvanic battery. The unit of electrical

pressure or electromotive force is called the volt, and takes its name

from Volta, the great founder of the science of galvanic or voltaic

electricity. From this pile constructed by Volta innumerable forms of

batteries have been devised. The evolution of the galvanic battery in

all its forms, from Volta to the present day, would fill a large volume

if all were described.

The discoveries of Michael Faraday (1791-1867), the distinguished

English chemist and physicist, led to another phase of the science that

has revolutionized modern life. Faraday made an experiment that contains

the germ of all forms of the modern dynamo, which is a machine of

comparatively recent development. He found that by winding a piece of

insulated wire around a piece of soft iron and bringing the two ends

(of the wire) very close together, and then placing the iron across the

poles of a permanent magnet and suddenly jerking it away, a spark would

pass between the two ends of the wire that was wound around the piece of

soft iron. Here was an incipient dynamo-electric machine--the germ of

that which plays such an important part in our modern civilization.

Having brought our history down to the present day, it would seem

scarcely necessary to recite that which everybody knows. It is well,

however, to call a halt once in a while and compare our present

conditions of civilization with those of the past. Our world is filled

with croakers who are always sighing for the good old days. But we can

easily imagine that if they could go back to those days their croaking

would be still louder than it is.

Before the advent of electricity many things were impossible that are

easy now. In the old days the world was very, very large; now, thanks to

electricity, it is knocking at the door of every man's house. The

lumbering stage-coach that was formerly our limited express--limited to

thirty or forty miles a day--has been supplanted by one that covers 1000

miles in the same time, and this high rate of speed is made possible

only by the use of the electric telegraph.

In the old days all Europe could be involved in a great war and the news

of it would be weeks in reaching our shores, but now the firing of the

first gun is heard at every fireside the world over, almost before the

smoke has cleared away. Our planet is threaded with iron nerves that run

over mountains and under seas, whose trembling atoms, thrilled with the

electric fire, speak to us daily and hourly of the great throbbing life

of the whole civilized world.

Electricity has given us a voice that can be heard a thousand miles, and

not only heard, but recognized. It has given us a pen that will write

our autograph in New York, although we are still in Chicago. It has

given us the best light, both from an optical and a sanitary standpoint,

that the world has ever seen. The old-fashioned, jogging horse-car has

been supplanted by the electric "trolley," and we no longer have our

feelings harrowed with pity for the poor old steeds that pulled those

lumbering coaches through the streets, with men and women crowded in and

hanging on to straps, while everybody trod on every other body's toes.

"In olden times we took a car

Drawn by a horse, if going far,

And felt that we were blest;

Now the conductor takes the fare

And puts a broomstick in the air--

And lightning does the rest.

"In other days, along the street,

A glimmering lantern led the feet,

When on a midnight stroll;

But now we catch, when night is nigh,

A piece of lightning from the sky

And stick it on a pole.

"Time was when one must hold his ear

Close to a whispering voice to hear,

Like deaf men--nigh and nigher;

But now from town to town he talks

And puts his nose into a box

And whispers through a wire."

So jogs the old world along. We sometimes think it is slow, but when we

look back a few years and see what has been accomplished it seems to

have had a marvelously rapid development.

Something like fifty years ago a professor of physics in one of our

colleges was giving his class a course in electricity. The electric

telegraph was too little known at that time to cut much of a figure in

the classroom, so the stock experiments were those made with the

frictional electric machine and the Leyden jar. One day the professor

had, in one hour's time, taken his class through a course of

electricity, and at the end he said: "Gentlemen, you were born too late

to witness the development of this great science." I often wonder if the

good professor is ever allowed to part the veil that separates us from

the great beyond and to look down upon this busy world of ours in which

electricity plays such an important part in our every-day life; and if

so, what he thinks of that little speech he made to the boys fifty years

or more ago.

If we make an analysis of the history of the science of electricity we

shall see that it has progressed in successive eras, shortening as they

approach our time. For a period of 2300 years, from Thales to Franklin,

but little or no progress was made beyond the further development of the

phenomena of frictional electricity--the most important invention being

that of the Leyden jar. From Franklin to Volta was forty-eight years,

and from Volta to Faraday about thirty-two years. From this time on the

development was very rapid as compared with the old days. Soon after

Faraday, Morse, Henry, Wheatstone, and others began experiments that

have grown, during fifty or sixty years, into a most colossal system of

electric telegraphs, telephones, electric lights and electric railroads.

In the latter days marvel has succeeded marvel with such rapid strides

that the ink is scarcely dry from the description of one before another

crowds itself upon our attention. Where it will all end no one knows,

but that it has ended no one believes. The human mind has become so

accustomed to these periodic revelations of the marvelous that it must

have the stimulus once in a while or it suffers as the toper does when

deprived of his cups. The commercial instinct of the news-vender is not

slow to see the situation, and if the development is too slow to suit

the public demand his fertile brain supplies the lack. So that every few

days we hear of some great discovery made by some one it may be unknown

to fame. It has served its purpose. The public mind has had its mental

toddy and has been saved from a fit of intellectual delirium tremens

that it was in danger of from lack of its accustomed stimulus.

Having given you a very limited outline of the history of electricity,

from ancient times down to the present, we will endeavor now to give you

an elementary notion of the science as it stands to-day. To the common

mind the science is a blank page. So little is known of it by the

ordinary reader, who is fairly intelligent in other matters, that to

account for anything that we do not understand it is only necessary to

say that it is an electrical phenomenon and he accepts it. Electricity

is a synonym for all that we cannot understand. Inasmuch as magnetism is

so closely related to electricity in its uses as related to every-day

life, we will carry the two subjects along together, as the one will to

a large extent help to explain the other. In our next chapter we will

look at the history of magnetism.

Electricity and Magnetism · 第 2 / 29 章