Chapter XXIV.

Yerba Buena's Gift to George and Mary Donner

An Alcalde's Negligence

Mary Donner's Land Regranted

Squatters Jump George Donner's Land

A Characteristic Land Law Suit

Vexatious Litigation

Twice Appealed to Supreme Court, and Once to United States

Supreme Court

A Well taken Law Point

Mutilating Records

A Palpable Erasure

Relics of the Donner Party

Five Hundred Articles

Buried Thirty-two Years

Knives, Forks, Spoons

Pretty Porcelain

Identifying Chinaware

Beads and Arrow-heads

A Quaint Bridle Bit

Remarkable Action of Rust

A Flintlock Pistol

A Baby's Shoe

The Resting Place of the Dead

Vanishing Landmarks.

Yerba Buena's citizens, shortly after the arrival of George and Mary

Donner, contributed a fund for the purpose of purchasing for each of

them a town lot. It happened that these lots were being then distributed

among the residents of the town. Upon the petition of James F. Reed,

a grant was made to George Donner of one hundred vara lot number

thirty-nine, and the adjoining lot, number thirty-eight, was granted to

Mary. The price of each lot was thirty-two dollars, and both were paid

for out of the fund. The grants were both entered of record by the

Alcalde, George Hyde. The grant made to George was signed by the

Alcalde, but that made to Mary was, through inadvertence, not signed. A

successor of Hyde, as Alcalde, regranted the lot of Mary Donner to one

Ward, who discovered the omission of the Alcalde's name to her grant.

This omission caused her to lose the lot. In 1851, a number of persons

squatted on the lot of George Donner, and in 1854 brought suit against

him in the United States Circuit Court to quiet their title. This suit

was subsequently abandoned under the belief that George Donner was dead.

In 1856, a suit was instituted by George Donner, through his guardian,

to recover possession of the lot. Down to the spring of 1860, but little

progress had been made toward recovering the possession of the lot from

the squatters. The attorneys who had thus far conducted the litigation

on behalf of George Donner, were greatly embarrassed because of their

inability to fully prove the delivery of the grant to him, or to some

one for him, the courts of the State having, from the first, litigation

concerning similar grants, laid down and adhered to the rule that such

grants did not take effect unless the original grant was delivered to

the grantee. Such proof was therefore deemed indispensable.

After such proofs upon this point as were accessible had been made,

the proceedings had ceased, and for several months there had been no

prospect of any further progress being made. During this time, one

Yonti, who had undertaken to recover possession of the lot at his own

expense for a share of it, had the management of the case, and had

employed an attorney to conduct the litigation. Yontz became unable,

pecuniarily, to proceed further with the case, and informed Donner

of the fact, whereupon the latter induced his brother-in-law, S. O.

Houghton, to attempt to prosecute his claim to some final result. Mr.

Houghton applied to the court to be substituted as attorney in the case,

but resistance was made by the attorney of Yontz, and the application

was denied. Houghton then applied to the Supreme Court for a writ of

mandate to compel the judge of the court before which the suit was

pending, to order his substitution as attorney of record for Donner.

This writ was granted by the Supreme Court, and in January, 1861, Mr.

Houghton became the attorney of record. This suit had been brought

by Green McMahon, who had been appointed Donner's guardian for that

purpose, and after a full examination of the case, Mr. Houghton

dismissed it, and immediately commenced another in the name of George

Donner, who was then of age. In the following year, February, 1862, it

was brought to trial before a jury, and after a contest which lasted ten

days, a verdict was rendered in favor of Donner.

The squatters appealed to the Supreme Court of the State where the

verdict of the jury was set aside, a new trial ordered, and the case

sent back for that purpose. This new trial was procured by means of an

amendment of the law, regulating trials by jury in civil cases.

This amendment was passed by the Legislature, at the instance of the

squatters, after the verdict had been rendered. A new trial was had in

1864, before a jury, and resulted in another verdict for Donner. The

first trial had attracted much attention, and was frequently mentioned

in the newspapers of San Francisco, and thus several persons who were

present when the grant was made had their attention called to the

controversy, and to the difficulty encountered in proving a delivery of

the grant. They communicated to Donner the fact that it was delivered

for him to William McDonald, the man with whom he lived at the time.

They also narrated the circumstances attending the delivery of the

grant. This information, however, came too late for the purposes of the

trial. Prior to the second trial, the written testimony of all these

witnesses was procured and in readiness for use when required, but it

was never required. Mr. Houghton and the attorneys whom he had called

upon to aid in the case, determined to rest its decision upon another

ground. They concluded to insist that, as it was a grant issuing from

the government through its instrument, the Alcalde, who was invested

with authority for the purpose, no delivery of the grant was necessary,

and that none was possible, as the entry on the record book of the

Alcalde was the original, it bearing his official signature and being a

public record of his official act. This was a bold attack upon the rule

which the courts had long established to the contrary. After a full

argument of the question at the second trial, the court sustained

the view of the law taken by Mr. Houghton and his associates, and, on

appeal, the decision was sustained by the Supreme Court of the State,

and subsequently affirmed by the Supreme Court of the United States,

before which the question was carried by writ of error.

Donner's attorneys adopted this course because, at the first trial, the

squatters had produced the copy of the grant which had actually

been issued and delivered. This they had obtained possession of and

mutilated, and then had surreptitiously placed it in the office of the

County Clerk of San Francisco, who was the custodian of the records of

the office of the Alcaldes of San Francisco. Their purpose was to make

it appear that it had never been signed or issued by the Alcalde, but

had been transferred with the other papers and records of that office

to the office of the County Clerk. This document was written on paper

having the same watermarks as numerous other grants to other persons,

admitted to be genuine, made about the same time as the grant to Donner.

The body of this instrument was in the handwriting of the then clerk of

the Alcalde, and the certificate that the Alcalde's fees had been

paid bore the genuine signature of the clerk. There was, however, no

signature or name where the signature of the Alcalde should have been;

but there was, instead, a plain, palpable erasure, easily seen by

holding the paper to the light.

George Donner lived to see his property become very valuable, but the

vexatious litigation above described was not terminated until after his

death. Meantime, however, he sold his interest, receiving therefor a

considerable sum of money.

In conclusion it may be proper to speak of the many interesting relics

which have recently been found under the former sites of the cabins

of the Donner Party. When the last relief party left Donner Lake, all

articles of minor value were left scattered here and there about the

floors and dooryards. Soon afterward the tide of emigrant travel turned

principally to other routes, and the Donner Lake road was comparatively

deserted. Years passed, and the loose soil, the windblown dust, the

grass and fallen leaves covered the articles from sight. It was twenty

years before men began to search for the sites of the cabins, and to

carry away little mementos of the mournful place. Nothing at this time

remained in sight save a few charred logs, and a few score of tall,

unsightly stumps. Even the old pioneers had great difficulty in pointing

out the location of more than one or two of the cabins. After the

preparation of this history began, the author induced several of the

survivors to visit Donner Lake, and to assist in definitely determining

the location and boundaries of the cabins. Digging in the earth which

thirty-two years ago formed the cabin floors, the most interesting

relics were found. A collection of over five hundred of these articles

is in the author's possession. There are spoons which are bent and

rust-eaten, some of which are partially without bowls, and some

destitute of handles, the missing portions being vaguely shadowed in the

rust-stained earth in which they were imbedded. Knives there are whose

blades are mere skeleton outlines of what they formerly were, and which

in some instances appear to be only thin scales of rust. The tines of

the forks are sometimes pretty well preserved, sometimes almost entirely

worn away by the action of rust.

Among the relics found at the Breen cabin are numerous pieces of old

porcelain, and chinaware. These fragments are readily distinguished

by painted flowers, or unique designs enameled in red, blue, or purple

colors upon the pure white ground-surface of the china-ware. This ware

is celebrated for the durability of its glaze or enamel, which can not

be scratched with a knife, and is not acted upon by vegetable acids. The

relics unearthed were found at a depth of from one to six inches beneath

the ground which formed the floor. A fragment of this ware, together

with an old-fashioned gun-flint, was sent to Hon. James F. Breen, who

wrote in reply:

"The relics, piece of chinaware and gun-flint, are highly appreciated.

The chinaware was at once recognized by my brother. In fact, there is

one piece of the china set (a cream pitcher) still in the possession of

my brother. The piece sent is recognizable by the decoration figures,

which correspond exactly with those on the pitcher."

There is less of the "ghastly" and "horrible" among the relics thus far

discovered than would be supposed. There are many, like the beads and

arrow-heads, which were evidently treasured by members of the party as

relics or curiosities collected while crossing the plains. There are

pieces of looking-glass which reflected the sunken, starved features

of the emigrants. Among the porcelain are pieces of pretty cups and

saucers, and dainty, expensive plates, which in those days were greatly

prized. Bits of glassware, such as tumblers, vials, and dishes, are

quite numerous. Bolts, nails, screws, nuts, chains, and portions of the

wagon irons, are almost unrecognizable on account of the rust. The nails

are wrought, and some of them look as if they might have been hammered

out by the emigrants. One of these nails is so firmly imbedded in rust

alongside a screw, that the two are inseparable. Metallic buttons are

found well preserved, a sewing awl is quite plainly distinguishable, and

an old-fashioned, quaint-looking bridle-bit retains much of its original

form. Some of the more delicate and perishable articles present the

somewhat remarkable appearance of having increased in size by the

accumulations of rust and earth in which they are encased. This is

especially the case with a darning-needle, which has increased its

circumference in places nearly one half, while in other places it is

eaten away until only a mere filament of steel remains. The sharp point

of a curved sewing-awl has grown with rust until it is larger than the

body of the awl. Several fish-hooks have been found, all more or less

rust eaten. A brass pistol, single barreled, apparently a century old,

was found under the Graves cabin, and near it was an old flint-lock.

In the corner of the fire-place of the Reed cabin were found several

bullets and number two shot. Gun-flints, ready for use or in a crude

form, were found in each of the cabins.

W. C. Graves visited the site of his father's cabin on the twenty-first

of April, 1879, and many articles were dug up in his presence which he

readily recognized. A large number of the leading citizens of Truckee

were present, and assisted in searching for the relics. Among other

things was a cooper's inshave, which belonged to his father, who was a

cooper by trade. An iron wagon hammer was also immediately recognized

as having been used in their wagon. A small tin box, whose close-fitting

cover was hermetically sealed with rust, was found, and while it was

being examined, one of the gentlemen, Mr. Frank Rabel, tapped it lightly

with his knife-handle. The side of the box crushed as easily as if it

had been an egg-shell. The wonderful fact connected with this relic,

however, is that Mr. Graves said, before the box was crushed, that his

mother kept oil of hemlock in this box, and that upon examination a

distinct odor of oil of hemlock was found remaining in the box.

A whetstone, or what might more properly be called an oil-stone, was

discovered at the Breen cabin. On this stone were the initials "J. F.

R.," which had evidently been cut into its surface with a knife-blade.

Mrs. V. E. Murphy and Mrs. Frank Lewis, the daughters of James F. Reed,

at once remembered this whetstone as having belonged to their father,

and fully identified it upon examination.

A great many pins have been found, most of which are the old-fashioned

round-headed ones. A strange feature in regard to these pins is

that although bright and clean, they crumble and break at almost the

slightest touch. The metal of which they are made appears to be entirely

decomposed. One of the most touching relics, in view of the sad, sad

history, is the sole of an infant's shoe. The tiny babe who wore the

shoe was probably among the number who perished of starvation.

The big rock against which the Murphy cabin stood is half hidden by

willows and by fallen tamaracks, whose branches are interlaced so as to

form a perfect net-work above the place where the cabin stood. Under the

floor of this cabin the remains of the poor victims are supposed to have

been buried. Nature appears to have made every effort to conceal the

spot. In addition to the bushes and the fallen trees there is a rank

growth of marsh grass, whose rootlets extend far down in the soil, and

firmly resist either shovel or spade. Until very late in the summer

this mournful spot is still further protected by being inundated by the

waters of Donner Creek. It is hardly necessary to remark that no relics

have ever been found under the site of the Murphy cabin. The tall stumps

which surround this rock, and the site of the Graves and Reed cabin, and

which are particularly numerous around the site of the Donner tents at

Alder Creek, are of themselves remarkable relics. Many of them were cut

by persons who stood on the top of very deep snow. They are frequently

ten, fifteen, and twenty feet in height. Time and the action of the

elements have caused them to decay until, in some instances, a child's

hand might cause them to totter and fall. In a few years more they all

will have disappeared.

End of Project Gutenberg's History of the Donner Party, by C.F. McGlashan

History of the Donner Party: A Tragedy of the Sierra · 第 24 / 24 章