SAMUEL TAYLOR COLERIDGE.

Coleridge, whose simple, unworldly character is as well known as his

genius, seems to have inherited his particular disposition from his

father. His father was the Rev. John Coleridge, the vicar of Ottery

St. Mary, in Devonshire. He was a learned man, the head master of

the free grammar-school at Ottery, as well as vicar. He had been

previously head master of the school at South Molton, and was one of

the persons who assisted Dr. Kennicott in his Hebrew Bible. "He was an

exceedingly studious man," says Gillman, on the authority of Coleridge

himself, "pious, of primitive manners, and the most simple habits:

passing events were little heeded by him, and therefore he was usually

characterized as 'the absent man.'" Coleridge was born October 21st,

1772, the youngest of thirteen children, of which nine were sons, one

of whom died in infancy. Of all these sons Coleridge is said to have

most resembled his father in mind and habit. His mother was, except

for education, in which she was deficient, a most fitting wife for

such a man. She was an active, careful housekeeper and manager, looked

well after worldly affairs, and was ambitious to place her sons well

in the world. She always told them to look after good, substantial,

sensible women, and not after fine harpsichord ladies. Coleridge used

to relate many instances of his father's absence of mind, one or two

of which we may quote. On one occasion, having to breakfast with his

bishop, he went, as was the practice of that day, into a barber's shop

to have his head shaved, wigs being then in common use. Just as the

operation was completed, the clock struck nine, the hour at which the

bishop punctually breakfasted. Roused as from a revery, he instantly

left the barber's shop, and in his haste forgetting his wig, appeared

at the breakfast-table, where the bishop and his party had assembled.

The bishop, well acquainted with his absent manners, courteously and

playfully requested him to walk into an adjoining room, and give his

opinion of a mirror which had arrived from London a few days

previously, and which disclosed to his astonished guest the

consequence of his haste and forgetfulness.

The old gentleman, Coleridge also related, had to take a journey on

some professional business, which would detain him from home for three

or four days: his good wife, in her care and watchfulness, had packed

a few things in a small trunk, and gave them in charge to her husband,

with strong injunctions that he was to put on a clean shirt every day.

On his return home, his wife went to search for his linen, when, to

her dismay, it was not in the trunk. A closer search, however,

discovered that the vicar had strictly obeyed her injunctions, and had

put on daily a clean shirt, but had forgotten to remove the one

underneath. This might have been the pleasantest and most portable

mode of carrying half-a-dozen shirts in winter, but not so in the

dog-days.

The poor idolized him and paid him the greatest reverence; and among

other causes, for the odd one of quoting the original Hebrew liberally

in his sermons. They felt themselves particularly favored by his

giving them "the very words the Spirit spoke in;" the agricultural

population flocked in from the neighborhood with great eagerness to

hear him on this account; and such an opinion did they acquire of his

learning, that they regarded his successor with much contempt, because

he addressed them in simple English. This worthy old man died when

Coleridge was about seven years old only.

He seems to have been a delicate child, of timid disposition. Being so

much younger than his brothers, he never came in to be a playfellow of

theirs, and thus to acquire physical hardihood and activity. "I was,"

he says, "in earliest childhood huffed away from the enjoyment of

muscular activity in play, to take refuge at my mother's side, or on

my little stool to read my book, and to listen to the talk of my

elders. I was driven from life in motion, to life in thought and

sensation. I never played except by myself, and then only acting over

what I had been reading or fancying; or half one, half the other, with

a stick cutting down weeds and nettles, as one of the seven champions

of Christendom. Alas! I had all the simplicity, all the docility of a

child, but none of the child's habits. I never thought as a child,

never had the language of a child. I forget whether it was in my fifth

or sixth year, but I believe the latter, in consequence of some

quarrel between me and my brother, in the first week in October, I ran

away from fear of being whipped, and passed the whole night--a night

of rain and storm--on a bleak side of a hill on the Otter, and was

there found at daybreak without the power of using my limbs, about six

yards from the naked bank of the river."

This anecdote has been differently related by Cottle, and by the

author of Pen and Pencil Sketches. They state that little Sammy

Coleridge, as they call him, when between three and four years of age,

had got a thread and a crooked pin from his elder sister Ann, and,

unknown to the family, had set out to fish in the Otter. That he had

wandered on and on, till, overtaken by fatigue, he lay down and slept.

That he continued out all night, to the consternation of the family,

and was found by a wagoner the next morning, who, going along the road

at four o'clock, thought he heard a child's voice. He stopped, and

listened. He now heard the voice cry out, "Betty! Betty! I can't pull

up the clothes." The wagoner went to the margin of the river, where he

saw, to his astonishment, a little child with a withy bough in his

hand, which hung over the stream, pulling hard, and on the very point

of dragging himself into the water. The child when awakened, as well

as frightened, could only say his name was Sammy, and the wagoner

carrying him into Ottery, joy indescribable spread through the town

and the parsonage.

Which version of this story is the more correct, who shall decide?

Little Coleridge, at the age of ten, was placed in Christ's Hospital

in London, through the influence of Judge Buller, who had been

educated by his father. This school was then, it seems, conducted in a

very miserable and unkind manner. Coleridge was half starved there,

neglected and wretched. The first bitter experiences of children who

have had tolerable homes, of such as have had a decent house over

their heads, and decent parents or friends, is on going to school.

There has, no doubt, been much improvement in these as in other

respects of late years. Schoolmasters, like other men, have felt the

growing influences of civilization and true feeling. But there is yet

much to be done in schools. Let it be remembered that fagging and

flogging still continue in our great public schools of Westminster,

Eton, and others. Riding the other day on the top of an omnibus

through London, we could, from that popular eminence, see the master

of a naval and military school exercising his vocation with the cane

on one of his unhappy scholars. This I presume is a part of what the

boys are systematically taught there--the preparatory initiation into

the floggings that they are likely to get in the army or navy. That is

bad and brutalizing enough, but that we are not yet advanced beyond

the absurd idea of driving learning into our gentlemen with the cudgel

and the birch, says very little indeed for our advance in true social

philosophy. Southey gives a very lively idea of the school change in a

boy's life, in his Hymn to the Penates.

"When first a little one I left my home,

I can remember the first grief I felt,

And the first painful smile that clothed my front

With feelings not its own. Sadly at night

I sat me down beside a stranger's hearth;

And when the lingering hour of rest was come,

First wet with tears my pillow."

Homes and Haunts of the Most Eminent British Poets, Vol. 2 (of 2) · 第 20 / 63 题