times: and the Roman bishops, who have deluged Europe and Asia
with blood, were compelled to reign as the ministers of charity
and peace. I. The church of Rome, as it has been formerly
observed, was endowed with ample possessions in Italy, Sicily,
and the more distant provinces; and her agents, who were commonly
sub-deacons, had acquired a civil, and even criminal,
jurisdiction over their tenants and husbandmen. The successor of
St. Peter administered his patrimony with the temper of a
vigilant and moderate landlord; 73 and the epistles of Gregory
are filled with salutary instructions to abstain from doubtful or
vexatious lawsuits; to preserve the integrity of weights and
measures; to grant every reasonable delay; and to reduce the
capitation of the slaves of the glebe, who purchased the right of
marriage by the payment of an arbitrary fine. 74 The rent or the
produce of these estates was transported to the mouth of the
Tyber, at the risk and expense of the pope: in the use of wealth
he acted like a faithful steward of the church and the poor, and
liberally applied to their wants the inexhaustible resources of
abstinence and order. The voluminous account of his receipts and
disbursements was kept above three hundred years in the Lateran,
as the model of Christian economy. On the four great festivals,
he divided their quarterly allowance to the clergy, to his
domestics, to the monasteries, the churches, the places of
burial, the almshouses, and the hospitals of Rome, and the rest
of the diocese. On the first day of every month, he distributed
to the poor, according to the season, their stated portion of
corn, wine, cheese, vegetables, oil, fish, fresh provisions,
clothes, and money; and his treasurers were continually summoned
to satisfy, in his name, the extraordinary demands of indigence
and merit. The instant distress of the sick and helpless, of
strangers and pilgrims, was relieved by the bounty of each day,
and of every hour; nor would the pontiff indulge himself in a
frugal repast, till he had sent the dishes from his own table to
some objects deserving of his compassion. The misery of the times
had reduced the nobles and matrons of Rome to accept, without a
blush, the benevolence of the church: three thousand virgins
received their food and raiment from the hand of their
benefactor; and many bishops of Italy escaped from the Barbarians
to the hospitable threshold of the Vatican. Gregory might justly
be styled the Father of his Country; and such was the extreme
sensibility of his conscience, that, for the death of a beggar
who had perished in the streets, he interdicted himself during
several days from the exercise of sacerdotal functions. II. The
misfortunes of Rome involved the apostolical pastor in the
business of peace and war; and it might be doubtful to himself,
whether piety or ambition prompted him to supply the place of his
absent sovereign. Gregory awakened the emperor from a long
slumber; exposed the guilt or incapacity of the exarch and his
inferior ministers; complained that the veterans were withdrawn
from Rome for the defence of Spoleto; encouraged the Italians to
guard their cities and altars; and condescended, in the crisis of
danger, to name the tribunes, and to direct the operations, of
the provincial troops. But the martial spirit of the pope was
checked by the scruples of humanity and religion: the imposition
of tribute, though it was employed in the Italian war, he freely
condemned as odious and oppressive; whilst he protected, against
the Imperial edicts, the pious cowardice of the soldiers who
deserted a military for a monastic life. If we may credit his own
declarations, it would have been easy for Gregory to exterminate
the Lombards by their domestic factions, without leaving a king,
a duke, or a count, to save that unfortunate nation from the
vengeance of their foes. As a Christian bishop, he preferred the
salutary offices of peace; his mediation appeased the tumult of
arms: but he was too conscious of the arts of the Greeks, and the
passions of the Lombards, to engage his sacred promise for the
observance of the truce. Disappointed in the hope of a general
and lasting treaty, he presumed to save his country without the
consent of the emperor or the exarch. The sword of the enemy was
suspended over Rome; it was averted by the mild eloquence and
seasonable gifts of the pontiff, who commanded the respect of
heretics and Barbarians. The merits of Gregory were treated by
the Byzantine court with reproach and insult; but in the
attachment of a grateful people, he found the purest reward of a
citizen, and the best right of a sovereign. 75
73 (return) [ Baronius is unwilling to expatiate on the care of
the patrimonies, lest he should betray that they consisted not of
kingdoms, but farms. The French writers, the Benedictine editors,
(tom. iv. l. iii. p. 272, &c.,) and Fleury, (tom. viii. p. 29,
&c.,) are not afraid of entering into these humble, though
useful, details; and the humanity of Fleury dwells on the social
virtues of Gregory.]
74 (return) [ I much suspect that this pecuniary fine on the
marriages of villains produced the famous, and often fabulous
right, de cuissage, de marquette, &c. With the consent of her
husband, a handsome bride might commute the payment in the arms
of a young landlord, and the mutual favor might afford a
precedent of local rather than legal tyranny]
75 (return) [ The temporal reign of Gregory I. is ably exposed by
Sigonius in the first book, de Regno Italiae. See his works, tom.
ii. p. 44—75]
Chapter XLVI: Troubles In Persia.—Part I.
Revolutions On Persia After The Death Of Chosroes On Nushirvan.—His Son
Hormouz, A Tyrant, Is Deposed.—Usurpation Of Baharam.—Flight And
Restoration Of Chosroes II.—His Gratitude To The Romans.—The Chagan Of
The Avars.—Revolt Of The Army Against Maurice.—His Death.—Tyranny Of
Phocas.—Elevation Of Heraclius.—The Persian War.—Chosroes Subdues
Syria, Egypt, And Asia Minor.—Siege Of Constantinople By The Persians
And Avars.—Persian Expeditions.—Victories And Triumph Of Heraclius.
The conflict of Rome and Persia was prolonged from the death of
Craesus to the reign of Heraclius. An experience of seven hundred
years might convince the rival nations of the impossibility of
maintaining their conquests beyond the fatal limits of the Tigris
and Euphrates. Yet the emulation of Trajan and Julian was
awakened by the trophies of Alexander, and the sovereigns of
Persia indulged the ambitious hope of restoring the empire of
Cyrus. 1 Such extraordinary efforts of power and courage will
always command the attention of posterity; but the events by
which the fate of nations is not materially changed, leave a
faint impression on the page of history, and the patience of the
reader would be exhausted by the repetition of the same
hostilities, undertaken without cause, prosecuted without glory,
and terminated without effect. The arts of negotiation, unknown
to the simple greatness of the senate and the Caesars, were
assiduously cultivated by the Byzantine princes; and the
memorials of their perpetual embassies 2 repeat, with the same
uniform prolixity, the language of falsehood and declamation, the
insolence of the Barbarians, and the servile temper of the
tributary Greeks. Lamenting the barren superfluity of materials,
I have studied to compress the narrative of these uninteresting
transactions: but the just Nushirvan is still applauded as the
model of Oriental kings, and the ambition of his grandson
Chosroes prepared the revolution of the East, which was speedily
accomplished by the arms and the religion of the successors of
Mahomet.
1 (return) [ Missis qui... reposcerent... veteres Persarum ac
Macedonum terminos, seque invasurum possessa Cyro et post
Alexandro, per vaniloquentiam ac minas jaciebat. Tacit. Annal.
vi. 31. Such was the language of the Arsacides. I have repeatedly
marked the lofty claims of the Sassanians.]
2 (return) [ See the embassies of Menander, extracted and
preserved in the tenth century by the order of Constantine
Porphyrogenitus.]
In the useless altercations, that precede and justify the
quarrels of princes, the Greeks and the Barbarians accused each
other of violating the peace which had been concluded between the
two empires about four years before the death of Justinian. The
sovereign of Persia and India aspired to reduce under his
obedience the province of Yemen or Arabia 3 Felix; the distant
land of myrrh and frankincense, which had escaped, rather than
opposed, the conquerors of the East. After the defeat of Abrahah
under the walls of Mecca, the discord of his sons and brothers
gave an easy entrance to the Persians: they chased the strangers
of Abyssinia beyond the Red Sea; and a native prince of the
ancient Homerites was restored to the throne as the vassal or
viceroy of the great Nushirvan. 4 But the nephew of Justinian
declared his resolution to avenge the injuries of his Christian
ally the prince of Abyssinia, as they suggested a decent pretence
to discontinue the annual tribute, which was poorly disguised by
the name of pension. The churches of Persarmenia were oppressed
by the intolerant spirit of the Magi; 411 they secretly invoked
the protector of the Christians, and, after the pious murder of
their satraps, the rebels were avowed and supported as the
brethren and subjects of the Roman emperor. The complaints of
Nushirvan were disregarded by the Byzantine court; Justin yielded
to the importunities of the Turks, who offered an alliance
against the common enemy; and the Persian monarchy was threatened
at the same instant by the united forces of Europe, of Aethiopia,
and of Scythia. At the age of fourscore the sovereign of the East
would perhaps have chosen the peaceful enjoyment of his glory and
greatness; but as soon as war became inevitable, he took the
field with the alacrity of youth, whilst the aggressor trembled
in the palace of Constantinople. Nushirvan, or Chosroes,
conducted in person the siege of Dara; and although that
important fortress had been left destitute of troops and
magazines, the valor of the inhabitants resisted above five
months the archers, the elephants, and the military engines of
the Great King. In the mean while his general Adarman advanced
from Babylon, traversed the desert, passed the Euphrates,
insulted the suburbs of Antioch, reduced to ashes the city of
Apamea, and laid the spoils of Syria at the feet of his master,
whose perseverance in the midst of winter at length subverted the
bulwark of the East. But these losses, which astonished the
provinces and the court, produced a salutary effect in the
repentance and abdication of the emperor Justin: a new spirit
arose in the Byzantine councils; and a truce of three years was
obtained by the prudence of Tiberius. That seasonable interval
was employed in the preparations of war; and the voice of rumor
proclaimed to the world, that from the distant countries of the
Alps and the Rhine, from Scythia, Maesia, Pannonia, Illyricum,
and Isauria, the strength of the Imperial cavalry was reenforced
with one hundred and fifty thousand soldiers. Yet the king of
Persia, without fear, or without faith, resolved to prevent the
attack of the enemy; again passed the Euphrates, and dismissing
the ambassadors of Tiberius, arrogantly commanded them to await
his arrival at Caesarea, the metropolis of the Cappadocian
provinces. The two armies encountered each other in the battle of
Melitene: 412 the Barbarians, who darkened the air with a cloud
of arrows, prolonged their line, and extended their wings across
the plain; while the Romans, in deep and solid bodies, expected
to prevail in closer action, by the weight of their swords and
lances. A Scythian chief, who commanded their right wing,
suddenly turned the flank of the enemy, attacked their rear-guard
in the presence of Chosroes, penetrated to the midst of the camp,
pillaged the royal tent, profaned the eternal fire, loaded a
train of camels with the spoils of Asia, cut his way through the
Persian host, and returned with songs of victory to his friends,
who had consumed the day in single combats, or ineffectual
skirmishes. The darkness of the night, and the separation of the
Romans, afforded the Persian monarch an opportunity of revenge;
and one of their camps was swept away by a rapid and impetuous
assault. But the review of his loss, and the consciousness of his
danger, determined Chosroes to a speedy retreat: he burnt, in his
passage, the vacant town of Melitene; and, without consulting the
safety of his troops, boldly swam the Euphrates on the back of an
elephant. After this unsuccessful campaign, the want of
magazines, and perhaps some inroad of the Turks, obliged him to
disband or divide his forces; the Romans were left masters of the
field, and their general Justinian, advancing to the relief of
the Persarmenian rebels, erected his standard on the banks of the
Araxes. The great Pompey had formerly halted within three days’
march of the Caspian: 5 that inland sea was explored, for the
first time, by a hostile fleet, 6 and seventy thousand captives
were transplanted from Hyrcania to the Isle of Cyprus. On the
return of spring, Justinian descended into the fertile plains of
Assyria; the flames of war approached the residence of Nushirvan;
the indignant monarch sunk into the grave; and his last edict
restrained his successors from exposing their person in battle
against the Romans. 611 Yet the memory of this transient affront
was lost in the glories of a long reign; and his formidable
enemies, after indulging their dream of conquest, again solicited
a short respite from the calamities of war. 7
3 (return) [ The general independence of the Arabs, which cannot
be admitted without many limitations, is blindly asserted in a
separate dissertation of the authors of the Universal History,
vol. xx. p. 196—250. A perpetual miracle is supposed to have
guarded the prophecy in favor of the posterity of Ishmael; and
these learned bigots are not afraid to risk the truth of
Christianity on this frail and slippery foundation. * Note: It
certainly appears difficult to extract a prediction of the
perpetual independence of the Arabs from the text in Genesis,
which would have received an ample fulfilment during centuries of
uninvaded freedom. But the disputants appear to forget the
inseparable connection in the prediction between the wild, the
Bedoween habits of the Ismaelites, with their national
independence. The stationary and civilized descendant of Ismael
forfeited, as it were, his birthright, and ceased to be a genuine
son of the “wild man” The phrase, “dwelling in the presence of
his brethren,” is interpreted by Rosenmüller (in loc.) and
others, according to the Hebrew geography, “to the East” of his
brethren, the legitimate race of Abraham—M.]
4 (return) [ D’Herbelot, Biblioth. Orient. p. 477. Pocock,
Specimen Hist. Arabum, p. 64, 65. Father Pagi (Critica, tom. ii.
p. 646) has proved that, after ten years’ peace, the Persian war,
which continued twenty years, was renewed A.D. 571. Mahomet was
born A.D. 569, in the year of the elephant, or the defeat of
Abrahah, (Gagnier, Vie de Mahomet, tom. i. p. 89, 90, 98;) and
this account allows two years for the conquest of Yemen. * Note:
Abrahah, according to some accounts, was succeeded by his son
Taksoum, who reigned seventeen years; his brother Mascouh, who
was slain in battle against the Persians, twelve. But this
chronology is irreconcilable with the Arabian conquests of
Nushirvan the Great. Either Seif, or his son Maadi Karb, was the
native prince placed on the throne by the Persians. St. Martin,
vol. x. p. 78. See likewise Johannsen, Hist. Yemanae.—M.]
411 (return) [ Persarmenia was long maintained in peace by the
tolerant administration of Mejej, prince of the Gnounians. On his
death he was succeeded by a persecutor, a Persian, named
Ten-Schahpour, who attempted to propagate Zoroastrianism by
violence. Nushirvan, on an appeal to the throne by the Armenian
clergy, replaced Ten-Schahpour, in 552, by Veschnas-Vahram. The
new marzban, or governor, was instructed to repress the bigoted
Magi in their persecutions of the Armenians, but the Persian
converts to Christianity were still exposed to cruel sufferings.
The most distinguished of them, Izdbouzid, was crucified at Dovin
in the presence of a vast multitude. The fame of this martyr
spread to the West. Menander, the historian, not only, as appears
by a fragment published by Mai, related this event in his
history, but, according to M. St. Martin, wrote a tragedy on the
subject. This, however, is an unwarrantable inference from the
phrase which merely means that he related the tragic event in his
history. An epigram on the same subject, preserved in the
Anthology, Jacob’s Anth. Palat. i. 27, belongs to the historian.
Yet Armenia remained in peace under the government of
Veschnas-Vahram and his successor Varazdat. The tyranny of his
successor Surena led to the insurrection under Vartan, the
Mamigonian, who revenged the death of his brother on the marzban
Surena, surprised Dovin, and put to the sword the governor, the
soldiers, and the Magians. From St. Martin, vol x. p. 79—89.—M.]
412 (return) [ Malathiah. It was in the lesser Armenia.—M.]
5 (return) [ He had vanquished the Albanians, who brought into
the field 12,000 horse and 60,000 foot; but he dreaded the
multitude of venomous reptiles, whose existence may admit of some
doubt, as well as that of the neighboring Amazons. Plutarch, in
Pompeio, tom. ii. p. 1165, 1166.]
6 (return) [ In the history of the world I can only perceive two
navies on the Caspian: 1. Of the Macedonians, when Patrocles, the
admiral of the kings of Syria, Seleucus and Antiochus, descended
most probably the River Oxus, from the confines of India, (Plin.
Hist. Natur. vi. 21.) 2. Of the Russians, when Peter the First
conducted a fleet and army from the neighborhood of Moscow to the
coast of Persia, (Bell’s Travels, vol. ii. p. 325—352.) He justly
observes, that such martial pomp had never been displayed on the
Volga.]
611 (return) [ This circumstance rests on the statements of
Evagrius and Theophylaci Simocatta. They are not of sufficient
authority to establish a fact so improbable. St. Martin, vol. x.
p. 140.—M.]
7 (return) [ For these Persian wars and treaties, see Menander,
in Excerpt. Legat. p. 113—125. Theophanes Byzant. apud Photium,
cod. lxiv p. 77, 80, 81. Evagrius, l. v. c. 7—15. Theophylact, l.
iii. c. 9—16 Agathias, l. iv. p. 140.]
The throne of Chosroes Nushirvan was filled by Hormouz, or
Hormisdas, the eldest or the most favored of his sons. With the
kingdoms of Persia and India, he inherited the reputation and
example of his father, the service, in every rank, of his wise
and valiant officers, and a general system of administration,
harmonized by time and political wisdom to promote the happiness
of the prince and people. But the royal youth enjoyed a still
more valuable blessing, the friendship of a sage who had presided
over his education, and who always preferred the honor to the
interest of his pupil, his interest to his inclination. In a
dispute with the Greek and Indian philosophers, Buzurg 8 had once
maintained, that the most grievous misfortune of life is old age
without the remembrance of virtue; and our candor will presume
that the same principle compelled him, during three years, to
direct the councils of the Persian empire. His zeal was rewarded
by the gratitude and docility of Hormouz, who acknowledged
himself more indebted to his preceptor than to his parent: but
when age and labor had impaired the strength, and perhaps the
faculties, of this prudent counsellor, he retired from court, and
abandoned the youthful monarch to his own passions and those of
his favorites. By the fatal vicissitude of human affairs, the
same scenes were renewed at Ctesiphon, which had been exhibited
at Rome after the death of Marcus Antoninus. The ministers of
flattery and corruption, who had been banished by his father,
were recalled and cherished by the son; the disgrace and exile of
the friends of Nushirvan established their tyranny; and virtue
was driven by degrees from the mind of Hormouz, from his palace,
and from the government of the state. The faithful agents, the
eyes and ears of the king, informed him of the progress of
disorder, that the provincial governors flew to their prey with
the fierceness of lions and eagles, and that their rapine and
injustice would teach the most loyal of his subjects to abhor the
name and authority of their sovereign. The sincerity of this
advice was punished with death; the murmurs of the cities were
despised, their tumults were quelled by military execution: the
intermediate powers between the throne and the people were
abolished; and the childish vanity of Hormouz, who affected the
daily use of the tiara, was fond of declaring, that he alone
would be the judge as well as the master of his kingdom.
In every word, and in every action, the son of Nushirvan
degenerated from the virtues of his father. His avarice defrauded
the troops; his jealous caprice degraded the satraps; the palace,
the tribunals, the waters of the Tigris, were stained with the
blood of the innocent, and the tyrant exulted in the sufferings
and execution of thirteen thousand victims. As the excuse of his
cruelty, he sometimes condescended to observe, that the fears of
the Persians would be productive of hatred, and that their hatred
must terminate in rebellion but he forgot that his own guilt and
folly had inspired the sentiments which he deplored, and prepared
the event which he so justly apprehended. Exasperated by long and
hopeless oppression, the provinces of Babylon, Susa, and
Carmania, erected the standard of revolt; and the princes of
Arabia, India, and Scythia, refused the customary tribute to the
unworthy successor of Nushirvan. The arms of the Romans, in slow
sieges and frequent inroads, afflicted the frontiers of
Mesopotamia and Assyria: one of their generals professed himself
the disciple of Scipio; and the soldiers were animated by a
miraculous image of Christ, whose mild aspect should never have
been displayed in the front of battle. 9 At the same time, the
eastern provinces of Persia were invaded by the great khan, who
passed the Oxus at the head of three or four hundred thousand
Turks. The imprudent Hormouz accepted their perfidious and
formidable aid; the cities of Khorassan or Bactriana were
commanded to open their gates; the march of the Barbarians
towards the mountains of Hyrcania revealed the correspondence of
the Turkish and Roman arms; and their union must have subverted
the throne of the house of Sassan.
8 (return) [ Buzurg Mihir may be considered, in his character and
station, as the Seneca of the East; but his virtues, and perhaps
his faults, are less known than those of the Roman, who appears
to have been much more loquacious. The Persian sage was the
person who imported from India the game of chess and the fables
of Pilpay. Such has been the fame of his wisdom and virtues, that
the Christians claim him as a believer in the gospel; and the
Mahometans revere Buzurg as a premature Mussulman. D’Herbelot,
Bibliotheque Orientale, p. 218.]
9 (return) [ See the imitation of Scipio in Theophylact, l. i. c.
14; the image of Christ, l. ii. c. 3. Hereafter I shall speak
more amply of the Christian images—I had almost said idols. This,
if I am not mistaken, is the oldest of divine manufacture; but in
the next thousand years, many others issued from the same
workshop.]
Persia had been lost by a king; it was saved by a hero. After his
revolt, Varanes or Bahram is stigmatized by the son of Hormouz as
an ungrateful slave; the proud and ambiguous reproach of
despotism, since he was truly descended from the ancient princes
of Rei, 10 one of the seven families whose splendid, as well as
substantial, prerogatives exalted them above the heads of the
Persian nobility. 11 At the siege of Dara, the valor of Bahram
was signalized under the eyes of Nushirvan, and both the father
and son successively promoted him to the command of armies, the
government of Media, and the superintendence of the palace. The
popular prediction which marked him as the deliverer of Persia,
might be inspired by his past victories and extraordinary figure:
the epithet Giubin 1111 is expressive of the quality of dry wood:
he had the strength and stature of a giant; and his savage
countenance was fancifully compared to that of a wild cat. While
the nation trembled, while Hormouz disguised his terror by the
name of suspicion, and his servants concealed their disloyalty
under the mask of fear, Bahram alone displayed his undaunted
courage and apparent fidelity: and as soon as he found that no
more than twelve thousand soldiers would follow him against the
enemy; he prudently declared, that to this fatal number Heaven
had reserved the honors of the triumph. 1112 The steep and narrow
descent of the Pule Rudbar, 12 or Hyrcanian rock, is the only
pass through which an army can penetrate into the territory of
Rei and the plains of Media. From the commanding heights, a band
of resolute men might overwhelm with stones and darts the myriads
of the Turkish host: their emperor and his son were transpierced
with arrows; and the fugitives were left, without counsel or
provisions, to the revenge of an injured people. The patriotism
of the Persian general was stimulated by his affection for the
city of his forefathers: in the hour of victory, every peasant
became a soldier, and every soldier a hero; and their ardor was
kindled by the gorgeous spectacle of beds, and thrones, and
tables of massy gold, the spoils of Asia, and the luxury of the
hostile camp. A prince of a less malignant temper could not
easily have forgiven his benefactor; and the secret hatred of
Hormouz was envenomed by a malicious report, that Bahram had
privately retained the most precious fruits of his Turkish
victory. But the approach of a Roman army on the side of the
Araxes compelled the implacable tyrant to smile and to applaud;
and the toils of Bahram were rewarded with the permission of
encountering a new enemy, by their skill and discipline more
formidable than a Scythian multitude. Elated by his recent
success, he despatched a herald with a bold defiance to the camp
of the Romans, requesting them to fix a day of battle, and to
choose whether they would pass the river themselves, or allow a
free passage to the arms of the great king. The lieutenant of the
emperor Maurice preferred the safer alternative; and this local
circumstance, which would have enhanced the victory of the
Persians, rendered their defeat more bloody and their escape more
difficult. But the loss of his subjects, and the danger of his
kingdom, were overbalanced in the mind of Hormouz by the disgrace
of his personal enemy; and no sooner had Bahram collected and
reviewed his forces, than he received from a royal messenger the
insulting gift of a distaff, a spinning-wheel, and a complete
suit of female apparel. Obedient to the will of his sovereign he
showed himself to the soldiers in this unworthy disguise: they
resented his ignominy and their own; a shout of rebellion ran
through the ranks; and the general accepted their oath of
fidelity and vows of revenge. A second messenger, who had been
commanded to bring the rebel in chains, was trampled under the
feet of an elephant, and manifestos were diligently circulated,
exhorting the Persians to assert their freedom against an odious
and contemptible tyrant. The defection was rapid and universal;
his loyal slaves were sacrificed to the public fury; the troops
deserted to the standard of Bahram; and the provinces again
saluted the deliverer of his country.
10 (return) [ Ragae, or Rei, is mentioned in the Apocryphal book
of Tobit as already flourishing, 700 years before Christ, under
the Assyrian empire. Under the foreign names of Europus and
Arsacia, this city, 500 stadia to the south of the Caspian gates,
was successively embellished by the Macedonians and Parthians,
(Strabo, l. xi. p. 796.) Its grandeur and populousness in the
ixth century are exaggerated beyond the bounds of credibility;
but Rei has been since ruined by wars and the unwholesomeness of
the air. Chardin, Voyage en Perse, tom. i. p. 279, 280.
D’Herbelot, Biblioth. Oriental. p. 714.]
11 (return) [ Theophylact. l. iii. c. 18. The story of the seven
Persians is told in the third book of Herodotus; and their noble
descendants are often mentioned, especially in the fragments of
Ctesias. Yet the independence of Otanes (Herodot. l. iii. c. 83,
84) is hostile to the spirit of despotism, and it may not seem
probable that the seven families could survive the revolutions of
eleven hundred years. They might, however, be represented by the
seven ministers, (Brisson, de Regno Persico, l. i. p. 190;) and
some Persian nobles, like the kings of Pontus (Polyb l. v. p.
540) and Cappadocia, (Diodor. Sicul. l. xxxi. tom. ii. p. 517,)
might claim their descent from the bold companions of Darius.]
1111 (return) [ He is generally called Baharam Choubeen, Baharam,
the stick-like, probably from his appearance. Malcolm, vol. i. p.
120.—M.]
1112 (return) [ The Persian historians say, that Hormouz
entreated his general to increase his numbers; but Baharam
replied, that experience had taught him that it was the quality,
not the number of soldiers, which gave success. * * * No man in
his army was under forty years, and none above fifty. Malcolm,
vol. i. p. 121—M.]
12 (return) [ See an accurate description of this mountain by
Olearius, (Voyage en Perse, p. 997, 998,) who ascended it with
much difficulty and danger in his return from Ispahan to the
Caspian Sea.]
As the passes were faithfully guarded, Hormouz could only compute
the number of his enemies by the testimony of a guilty
conscience, and the daily defection of those who, in the hour of
his distress, avenged their wrongs, or forgot their obligations.
He proudly displayed the ensigns of royalty; but the city and
palace of Modain had already escaped from the hand of the tyrant.
Among the victims of his cruelty, Bindoes, a Sassanian prince,
had been cast into a dungeon; his fetters were broken by the zeal
and courage of a brother; and he stood before the king at the
head of those trusty guards, who had been chosen as the ministers
of his confinement, and perhaps of his death. Alarmed by the
hasty intrusion and bold reproaches of the captive, Hormouz
looked round, but in vain, for advice or assistance; discovered
that his strength consisted in the obedience of others; and
patiently yielded to the single arm of Bindoes, who dragged him
from the throne to the same dungeon in which he himself had been
so lately confined. At the first tumult, Chosroes, the eldest of
the sons of Hormouz, escaped from the city; he was persuaded to
return by the pressing and friendly invitation of Bindoes, who
promised to seat him on his father’s throne, and who expected to
reign under the name of an inexperienced youth. In the just
assurance, that his accomplices could neither forgive nor hope to
be forgiven, and that every Persian might be trusted as the judge
and enemy of the tyrant, he instituted a public trial without a
precedent and without a copy in the annals of the East. The son
of Nushirvan, who had requested to plead in his own defence, was
introduced as a criminal into the full assembly of the nobles and
satraps. 13 He was heard with decent attention as long as he
expatiated on the advantages of order and obedience, the danger
of innovation, and the inevitable discord of those who had
encouraged each other to trample on their lawful and hereditary
sovereign. By a pathetic appeal to their humanity, he extorted
that pity which is seldom refused to the fallen fortunes of a
king; and while they beheld the abject posture and squalid
appearance of the prisoner, his tears, his chains, and the marks
of ignominious stripes, it was impossible to forget how recently
they had adored the divine splendor of his diadem and purple. But
an angry murmur arose in the assembly as soon as he presumed to
vindicate his conduct, and to applaud the victories of his reign.
He defined the duties of a king, and the Persian nobles listened
with a smile of contempt; they were fired with indignation when
he dared to vilify the character of Chosroes; and by the
indiscreet offer of resigning the sceptre to the second of his
sons, he subscribed his own condemnation, and sacrificed the life
of his own innocent favorite. The mangled bodies of the boy and
his mother were exposed to the people; the eyes of Hormouz were
pierced with a hot needle; and the punishment of the father was
succeeded by the coronation of his eldest son. Chosroes had
ascended the throne without guilt, and his piety strove to
alleviate the misery of the abdicated monarch; from the dungeon
he removed Hormouz to an apartment of the palace, supplied with
liberality the consolations of sensual enjoyment, and patiently
endured the furious sallies of his resentment and despair. He
might despise the resentment of a blind and unpopular tyrant, but
the tiara was trembling on his head, till he could subvert the
power, or acquire the friendship, of the great Bahram, who
sternly denied the justice of a revolution, in which himself and
his soldiers, the true representatives of Persia, had never been
consulted. The offer of a general amnesty, and of the second rank
in his kingdom, was answered by an epistle from Bahram, friend of
the gods, conqueror of men, and enemy of tyrants, the satrap of
satraps, general of the Persian armies, and a prince adorned with
the title of eleven virtues. 14 He commands Chosroes, the son of
Hormouz, to shun the example and fate of his father, to confine
the traitors who had been released from their chains, to deposit
in some holy place the diadem which he had usurped, and to accept
from his gracious benefactor the pardon of his faults and the
government of a province. The rebel might not be proud, and the
king most assuredly was not humble; but the one was conscious of
his strength, the other was sensible of his weakness; and even
the modest language of his reply still left room for treaty and
reconciliation. Chosroes led into the field the slaves of the
palace and the populace of the capital: they beheld with terror
the banners of a veteran army; they were encompassed and
surprised by the evolutions of the general; and the satraps who
had deposed Hormouz, received the punishment of their revolt, or
expiated their first treason by a second and more criminal act of
disloyalty. The life and liberty of Chosroes were saved, but he
was reduced to the necessity of imploring aid or refuge in some
foreign land; and the implacable Bindoes, anxious to secure an
unquestionable title, hastily returned to the palace, and ended,
with a bowstring, the wretched existence of the son of Nushirvan.
15
13 (return) [ The Orientals suppose that Bahram convened this
assembly and proclaimed Chosroes; but Theophylact is, in this
instance, more distinct and credible. * Note: Yet Theophylact
seems to have seized the opportunity to indulge his propensity
for writing orations; and the orations read rather like those of
a Grecian sophist than of an Eastern assembly.—M.]
14 (return) [ See the words of Theophylact, l. iv. c. 7., &c. In
answer, Chosroes styles himself in genuine Oriental bombast.]
15 (return) [ Theophylact (l. iv. c. 7) imputes the death of
Hormouz to his son, by whose command he was beaten to death with
clubs. I have followed the milder account of Khondemir and
Eutychius, and shall always be content with the slightest
evidence to extenuate the crime of parricide. Note: Malcolm
concurs in ascribing his death to Bundawee, (Bindoes,) vol. i. p.
123. The Eastern writers generally impute the crime to the uncle
St. Martin, vol. x. p. 300.—M.]
While Chosroes despatched the preparations of his retreat, he
deliberated with his remaining friends, 16 whether he should lurk
in the valleys of Mount Caucasus, or fly to the tents of the
Turks, or solicit the protection of the emperor. The long
emulation of the successors of Artaxerxes and Constantine
increased his reluctance to appear as a suppliant in a rival
court; but he weighed the forces of the Romans, and prudently
considered that the neighborhood of Syria would render his escape
more easy and their succors more effectual. Attended only by his
concubines, and a troop of thirty guards, he secretly departed
from the capital, followed the banks of the Euphrates, traversed
the desert, and halted at the distance of ten miles from
Circesium. About the third watch of the night, the Roman præfect
was informed of his approach, and he introduced the royal
stranger to the fortress at the dawn of day. From thence the king
of Persia was conducted to the more honorable residence of
Hierapolis; and Maurice dissembled his pride, and displayed his
benevolence, at the reception of the letters and ambassadors of
the grandson of Nushirvan. They humbly represented the
vicissitudes of fortune and the common interest of princes,
exaggerated the ingratitude of Bahram, the agent of the evil
principle, and urged, with specious argument, that it was for the
advantage of the Romans themselves to support the two monarchies
which balance the world, the two great luminaries by whose
salutary influence it is vivified and adorned. The anxiety of
Chosroes was soon relieved by the assurance, that the emperor had
espoused the cause of justice and royalty; but Maurice prudently
declined the expense and delay of his useless visit to
Constantinople. In the name of his generous benefactor, a rich
diadem was presented to the fugitive prince, with an inestimable
gift of jewels and gold; a powerful army was assembled on the
frontiers of Syria and Armenia, under the command of the valiant
and faithful Narses, 17 and this general, of his own nation, and
his own choice, was directed to pass the Tigris, and never to
sheathe his sword till he had restored Chosroes to the throne of
his ancestors. 1711 The enterprise, however splendid, was less
arduous than it might appear. Persia had already repented of her
fatal rashness, which betrayed the heir of the house of Sassan to
the ambition of a rebellious subject: and the bold refusal of the
Magi to consecrate his usurpation, compelled Bahram to assume the
sceptre, regardless of the laws and prejudices of the nation. The
palace was soon distracted with conspiracy, the city with tumult,
the provinces with insurrection; and the cruel execution of the
guilty and the suspected served to irritate rather than subdue
the public discontent. No sooner did the grandson of Nushirvan
display his own and the Roman banners beyond the Tigris, than he
was joined, each day, by the increasing multitudes of the
nobility and people; and as he advanced, he received from every
side the grateful offerings of the keys of his cities and the
heads of his enemies. As soon as Modain was freed from the
presence of the usurper, the loyal inhabitants obeyed the first
summons of Mebodes at the head of only two thousand horse, and
Chosroes accepted the sacred and precious ornaments of the palace
as the pledge of their truth and the presage of his approaching
success. After the junction of the Imperial troops, which Bahram
vainly struggled to prevent, the contest was decided by two
battles on the banks of the Zab, and the confines of Media. The
Romans, with the faithful subjects of Persia, amounted to sixty
thousand, while the whole force of the usurper did not exceed
forty thousand men: the two generals signalized their valor and
ability; but the victory was finally determined by the prevalence
of numbers and discipline. With the remnant of a broken army,
Bahram fled towards the eastern provinces of the Oxus: the enmity
of Persia reconciled him to the Turks; but his days were
shortened by poison, perhaps the most incurable of poisons; the
stings of remorse and despair, and the bitter remembrance of lost
glory. Yet the modern Persians still commemorate the exploits of
Bahram; and some excellent laws have prolonged the duration of
his troubled and transitory reign.
16 (return) [ After the battle of Pharsalia, the Pompey of Lucan
(l. viii. 256—455) holds a similar debate. He was himself
desirous of seeking the Parthians: but his companions abhorred
the unnatural alliance and the adverse prejudices might operate
as forcibly on Chosroes and his companions, who could describe,
with the same vehemence, the contrast of laws, religion, and
manners, between the East and West.]
17 (return) [ In this age there were three warriors of the name
of Narses, who have been often confounded, (Pagi, Critica, tom.
ii. p. 640:) 1. A Persarmenian, the brother of Isaac and
Armatius, who, after a successful action against Belisarius,
deserted from his Persian sovereign, and afterwards served in the
Italian war.—2. The eunuch who conquered Italy.—3. The restorer
of Chosroes, who is celebrated in the poem of Corippus (l. iii.
220—327) as excelsus super omnia vertico agmina.... habitu
modestus.... morum probitate placens, virtute verendus;
fulmineus, cautus, vigilans, &c.]
1711 (return) [ The Armenians adhered to Chosroes. St. Martin,
vol. x. p. 312.—M. ——According to Mivkhond and the Oriental
writers, Bahram received the daughter of the Khakan in marriage,
and commanded a body of Turks in an invasion of Persia. Some say
that he was assassinated; Malcolm adopts the opinion that he was
poisoned. His sister Gourdieh, the companion of his flight, is
celebrated in the Shah Nameh. She was afterwards one of the wives
of Chosroes. St. Martin. vol. x. p. 331.—M.]
The restoration of Chosroes was celebrated with feasts and
executions; and the music of the royal banquet was often
disturbed by the groans of dying or mutilated criminals. A
general pardon might have diffused comfort and tranquillity
through a country which had been shaken by the late revolutions;
yet, before the sanguinary temper of Chosroes is blamed, we
should learn whether the Persians had not been accustomed either
to dread the rigor, or to despise the weakness, of their
sovereign. The revolt of Bahram, and the conspiracy of the
satraps, were impartially punished by the revenge or justice of
the conqueror; the merits of Bindoes himself could not purify his
hand from the guilt of royal blood: and the son of Hormouz was
desirous to assert his own innocence, and to vindicate the
sanctity of kings. During the vigor of the Roman power, several
princes were seated on the throne of Persia by the arms and the
authority of the first Caesars. But their new subjects were soon
disgusted with the vices or virtues which they had imbibed in a
foreign land; the instability of their dominion gave birth to a
vulgar observation, that the choice of Rome was solicited and
rejected with equal ardor by the capricious levity of Oriental
slaves. But the glory of Maurice was conspicuous in the long and
fortunate reign of his son and his ally. A band of a thousand
Romans, who continued to guard the person of Chosroes, proclaimed
his confidence in the fidelity of the strangers; his growing
strength enabled him to dismiss this unpopular aid, but he
steadily professed the same gratitude and reverence to his
adopted father; and till the death of Maurice, the peace and
alliance of the two empires were faithfully maintained. 18 Yet
the mercenary friendship of the Roman prince had been purchased
with costly and important gifts; the strong cities of
Martyropolis and Dara 1811 were restored, and the Persarmenians
became the willing subjects of an empire, whose eastern limit was
extended, beyond the example of former times, as far as the banks
of the Araxes, and the neighborhood of the Caspian. A pious hope
was indulged, that the church as well as the state might triumph
in this revolution: but if Chosroes had sincerely listened to the
Christian bishops, the impression was erased by the zeal and
eloquence of the Magi: if he was armed with philosophic
indifference, he accommodated his belief, or rather his
professions, to the various circumstances of an exile and a
sovereign. The imaginary conversion of the king of Persia was
reduced to a local and superstitious veneration for Sergius, 19
one of the saints of Antioch, who heard his prayers and appeared
to him in dreams; he enriched the shrine with offerings of gold
and silver, and ascribed to this invisible patron the success of
his arms, and the pregnancy of Sira, a devout Christian and the
best beloved of his wives. 20 The beauty of Sira, or Schirin, 21
her wit, her musical talents, are still famous in the history, or
rather in the romances, of the East: her own name is expressive,
in the Persian tongue, of sweetness and grace; and the epithet of
Parviz alludes to the charms of her royal lover. Yet Sira never
shared the passions which she inspired, and the bliss of Chosroes
was tortured by a jealous doubt, that while he possessed her
person, she had bestowed her affections on a meaner favorite. 22
18 (return) [ Experimentis cognitum est Barbaros malle Roma
petere reges quam habere. These experiments are admirably
represented in the invitation and expulsion of Vonones, (Annal.
ii. 1—3,) Tiridates, (Annal. vi. 32-44,) and Meherdates, (Annal.
xi. 10, xii. 10-14.) The eye of Tacitus seems to have
transpierced the camp of the Parthians and the walls of the
harem.]
1811 (return) [ Concerning Nisibis, see St. Martin and his
Armenian authorities, vol. x p. 332, and Memoires sur l’Armenie,
tom. i. p. 25.—M.]
19 (return) [ Sergius and his companion Bacchus, who are said to
have suffered in the persecution of Maximian, obtained divine
honor in France, Italy, Constantinople, and the East. Their tomb
at Rasaphe was famous for miracles, and that Syrian town acquired
the more honorable name of Sergiopolis. Tillemont, Mem. Eccles.
tom. v. p. 481—496. Butler’s Saints, vol. x. p. 155.]
20 (return) [ Evagrius (l. vi. c. 21) and Theophylact (l. v. c.
13, 14) have preserved the original letters of Chosroes, written
in Greek, signed with his own hand, and afterwards inscribed on
crosses and tables of gold, which were deposited in the church of
Sergiopolis. They had been sent to the bishop of Antioch, as
primate of Syria. * Note: St. Martin thinks that they were first
written in Syriac, and then translated into the bad Greek in
which they appear, vol. x. p. 334.—M.]
21 (return) [ The Greeks only describe her as a Roman by birth, a
Christian by religion: but she is represented as the daughter of
the emperor Maurice in the Persian and Turkish romances which
celebrate the love of Khosrou for Schirin, of Schirin for Ferhad,
the most beautiful youth of the East, D’Herbelot, Biblioth.
Orient. p. 789, 997, 998. * Note: Compare M. von Hammer’s preface
to, and poem of, Schirin in which he gives an account of the
various Persian poems, of which he has endeavored to extract the
essence in his own work.—M.]
22 (return) [ The whole series of the tyranny of Hormouz, the
revolt of Bahram, and the flight and restoration of Chosroes, is
related by two contemporary Greeks—more concisely by Evagrius,
(l. vi. c. 16, 17, 18, 19,) and most diffusely by Theophylact
Simocatta, (l. iii. c. 6—18, l. iv. c. 1—16, l. v. c. 1-15:)
succeeding compilers, Zonaras and Cedrenus, can only transcribe
and abridge. The Christian Arabs, Eutychius (Annal. tom. ii. p.
200—208) and Abulpharagius (Dynast. p. 96—98) appear to have
consulted some particular memoirs. The great Persian historians
of the xvth century, Mirkhond and Khondemir, are only known to me
by the imperfect extracts of Schikard, (Tarikh, p. 150—155,)
Texeira, or rather Stevens, (Hist. of Persia, p. 182—186,) a
Turkish Ms. translated by the Abbe Fourmount, (Hist. de
l’Academie des Inscriptions, tom. vii. p. 325—334,) and
D’Herbelot, (aux mots Hormouz, p. 457—459. Bahram, p. 174.
Khosrou Parviz, p. 996.) Were I perfectly satisfied of their
authority, I could wish these Oriental materials had been more
copious.]
Chapter XLVI: Troubles In Persia.—Part II.
While the majesty of the Roman name was revived in the East, the
prospect of Europe is less pleasing and less glorious. By the
departure of the Lombards, and the ruin of the Gepidae, the
balance of power was destroyed on the Danube; and the Avars
spread their permanent dominion from the foot of the Alps to the
sea-coast of the Euxine. The reign of Baian is the brightest aera
of their monarchy; their chagan, who occupied the rustic palace
of Attila, appears to have imitated his character and policy; 23
but as the same scenes were repeated in a smaller circle, a
minute representation of the copy would be devoid of the
greatness and novelty of the original. The pride of the second
Justin, of Tiberius, and Maurice, was humbled by a proud
Barbarian, more prompt to inflict, than exposed to suffer, the
injuries of war; and as often as Asia was threatened by the
Persian arms, Europe was oppressed by the dangerous inroads, or
costly friendship, of the Avars. When the Roman envoys approached
the presence of the chagan, they were commanded to wait at the
door of his tent, till, at the end perhaps of ten or twelve days,
he condescended to admit them. If the substance or the style of
their message was offensive to his ear, he insulted, with real or
affected fury, their own dignity, and that of their prince; their
baggage was plundered, and their lives were only saved by the
promise of a richer present and a more respectful address. But
his sacred ambassadors enjoyed and abused an unbounded license in
the midst of Constantinople: they urged, with importunate
clamors, the increase of tribute, or the restitution of captives
and deserters: and the majesty of the empire was almost equally
degraded by a base compliance, or by the false and fearful
excuses with which they eluded such insolent demands. The chagan
had never seen an elephant; and his curiosity was excited by the
strange, and perhaps fabulous, portrait of that wonderful animal.
At his command, one of the largest elephants of the Imperial
stables was equipped with stately caparisons, and conducted by a
numerous train to the royal village in the plains of Hungary. He
surveyed the enormous beast with surprise, with disgust, and
possibly with terror; and smiled at the vain industry of the
Romans, who, in search of such useless rarities, could explore
the limits of the land and sea. He wished, at the expense of the
emperor, to repose in a golden bed. The wealth of Constantinople,
and the skilful diligence of her artists, were instantly devoted
to the gratification of his caprice; but when the work was
finished, he rejected with scorn a present so unworthy the
majesty of a great king. 24 These were the casual sallies of his
pride; but the avarice of the chagan was a more steady and
tractable passion: a rich and regular supply of silk apparel,
furniture, and plate, introduced the rudiments of art and luxury
among the tents of the Scythians; their appetite was stimulated
by the pepper and cinnamon of India; 25 the annual subsidy or
tribute was raised from fourscore to one hundred and twenty
thousand pieces of gold; and after each hostile interruption, the
payment of the arrears, with exorbitant interest, was always made
the first condition of the new treaty. In the language of a
Barbarian, without guile, the prince of the Avars affected to
complain of the insincerity of the Greeks; 26 yet he was not
inferior to the most civilized nations in the refinement of
dissimulation and perfidy. As the successor of the Lombards, the
chagan asserted his claim to the important city of Sirmium, the
ancient bulwark of the Illyrian provinces. 27 The plains of the
Lower Hungary were covered with the Avar horse and a fleet of
large boats was built in the Hercynian wood, to descend the
Danube, and to transport into the Save the materials of a bridge.
But as the strong garrison of Singidunum, which commanded the
conflux of the two rivers, might have stopped their passage and
baffled his designs, he dispelled their apprehensions by a solemn
oath that his views were not hostile to the empire. He swore by
his sword, the symbol of the god of war, that he did not, as the
enemy of Rome, construct a bridge upon the Save. “If I violate my
oath,” pursued the intrepid Baian, “may I myself, and the last of
my nation, perish by the sword! May the heavens, and fire, the
deity of the heavens, fall upon our heads! May the forests and
mountains bury us in their ruins! and the Save returning, against
the laws of nature, to his source, overwhelm us in his angry
waters!” After this barbarous imprecation, he calmly inquired,
what oath was most sacred and venerable among the Christians,
what guilt or perjury it was most dangerous to incur. The bishop
of Singidunum presented the gospel, which the chagan received
with devout reverence. “I swear,” said he, “by the God who has
spoken in this holy book, that I have neither falsehood on my
tongue, nor treachery in my heart.” As soon as he rose from his
knees, he accelerated the labor of the bridge, and despatched an
envoy to proclaim what he no longer wished to conceal. “Inform
the emperor,” said the perfidious Baian, “that Sirmium is
invested on every side. Advise his prudence to withdraw the
citizens and their effects, and to resign a city which it is now
impossible to relieve or defend.” Without the hope of relief, the
defence of Sirmium was prolonged above three years: the walls
were still untouched; but famine was enclosed within the walls,
till a merciful capitulation allowed the escape of the naked and
hungry inhabitants. Singidunum, at the distance of fifty miles,
experienced a more cruel fate: the buildings were razed, and the
vanquished people was condemned to servitude and exile. Yet the
ruins of Sirmium are no longer visible; the advantageous
situation of Singidunum soon attracted a new colony of
Sclavonians, and the conflux of the Save and Danube is still
guarded by the fortifications of Belgrade, or the White City, so
often and so obstinately disputed by the Christian and Turkish
arms. 28 From Belgrade to the walls of Constantinople a line may
be measured of six hundred miles: that line was marked with
flames and with blood; the horses of the Avars were alternately
bathed in the Euxine and the Adriatic; and the Roman pontiff,
alarmed by the approach of a more savage enemy, 29 was reduced to
cherish the Lombards, as the protectors of Italy. The despair of
a captive, whom his country refused to ransom, disclosed to the
Avars the invention and practice of military engines. 30 But in
the first attempts they were rudely framed, and awkwardly
managed; and the resistance of Diocletianopolis and Beraea, of
Philippopolis and Adrianople, soon exhausted the skill and
patience of the besiegers. The warfare of Baian was that of a
Tartar; yet his mind was susceptible of a humane and generous
sentiment: he spared Anchialus, whose salutary waters had
restored the health of the best beloved of his wives; and the
Romans confessed, that their starving army was fed and dismissed
by the liberality of a foe. His empire extended over Hungary,
Poland, and Prussia, from the mouth of the Danube to that of the
Oder; 31 and his new subjects were divided and transplanted by
the jealous policy of the conqueror. 32 The eastern regions of
Germany, which had been left vacant by the emigration of the
Vandals, were replenished with Sclavonian colonists; the same
tribes are discovered in the neighborhood of the Adriatic and of
the Baltic, and with the name of Baian himself, the Illyrian
cities of Neyss and Lissa are again found in the heart of
Silesia. In the disposition both of his troops and provinces the
chagan exposed the vassals, whose lives he disregarded, 33 to the
first assault; and the swords of the enemy were blunted before
they encountered the native valor of the Avars.
23 (return) [ A general idea of the pride and power of the chagan
may be taken from Menander (Excerpt. Legat. p. 118, &c.) and
Theophylact, (l. i. c. 3, l. vii. c. 15,) whose eight books are
much more honorable to the Avar than to the Roman prince. The
predecessors of Baian had tasted the liberality of Rome, and he
survived the reign of Maurice, (Buat, Hist. des Peuples Barbares,
tom. xi. p. 545.) The chagan who invaded Italy, A.D. 611,
(Muratori, Annali, tom. v. p. 305,) was then invenili aetate
florentem, (Paul Warnefrid, de Gest. Langobard. l v c 38,) the
son, perhaps, or the grandson, of Baian.]
24 (return) [ Theophylact, l. i. c. 5, 6.]
25 (return) [ Even in the field, the chagan delighted in the use
of these aromatics. He solicited, as a gift, and received.
Theophylact, l. vii. c. 13. The Europeans of the ruder ages
consumed more spices in their meat and drink than is compatible
with the delicacy of a modern palate. Vie Privee des Francois,
tom. ii. p. 162, 163.]
26 (return) [ Theophylact, l. vi. c. 6, l. vii. c. 15. The Greek
historian confesses the truth and justice of his reproach]
27 (return) [ Menander (in Excerpt. Legat. p. 126—132, 174, 175)
describes the perjury of Baian and the surrender of Sirmium. We
have lost his account of the siege, which is commended by
Theophylact, l. i. c. 3. * Note: Compare throughout Schlozer
Nordische Geschichte, p. 362—373—M.]
28 (return) [ See D’Anville, in the Memoires de l’Acad. des
Inscriptions, tom. xxviii. p. 412—443. The Sclavonic name of
Belgrade is mentioned in the xth century by Constantine
Porphyrogenitus: the Latin appellation of Alba Croeca is used by
the Franks in the beginning of the ixth, (p. 414.)]
29 (return) [ Baron. Annal. Eccles. A. B. 600, No. 1. Paul
Warnefrid (l. iv. c. 38) relates their irruption into Friuli, and
(c. 39) the captivity of his ancestors, about A.D. 632. The
Sclavi traversed the Adriatic cum multitudine navium, and made a
descent in the territory of Sipontum, (c. 47.)]
30 (return) [ Even the helepolis, or movable turret. Theophylact,
l. ii. 16, 17.]
31 (return) [ The arms and alliances of the chagan reached to the
neighborhood of a western sea, fifteen months’ journey from
Constantinople. The emperor Maurice conversed with some itinerant
harpers from that remote country, and only seems to have mistaken
a trade for a nation Theophylact, l. vi. c. 2.]
32 (return) [ This is one of the most probable and luminous
conjectures of the learned count de Buat, (Hist. des Peuples
Barbares, tom. xi. p. 546—568.) The Tzechi and Serbi are found
together near Mount Caucasus, in Illyricum, and on the lower
Elbe. Even the wildest traditions of the Bohemians, &c., afford
some color to his hypothesis.]
33 (return) [ See Fredegarius, in the Historians of France, tom.
ii. p. 432. Baian did not conceal his proud insensibility.]
The Persian alliance restored the troops of the East to the
defence of Europe: and Maurice, who had supported ten years the
insolence of the chagan, declared his resolution to march in
person against the Barbarians. In the space of two centuries,
none of the successors of Theodosius had appeared in the field:
their lives were supinely spent in the palace of Constantinople;
and the Greeks could no longer understand, that the name of
emperor, in its primitive sense, denoted the chief of the armies
of the republic. The martial ardor of Maurice was opposed by the
grave flattery of the senate, the timid superstition of the
patriarch, and the tears of the empress Constantina; and they all
conjured him to devolve on some meaner general the fatigues and
perils of a Scythian campaign. Deaf to their advice and entreaty,
the emperor boldly advanced 34 seven miles from the capital; the
sacred ensign of the cross was displayed in the front; and
Maurice reviewed, with conscious pride, the arms and numbers of
the veterans who had fought and conquered beyond the Tigris.
Anchialus was the last term of his progress by sea and land; he
solicited, without success, a miraculous answer to his nocturnal
prayers; his mind was confounded by the death of a favorite
horse, the encounter of a wild boar, a storm of wind and rain,
and the birth of a monstrous child; and he forgot that the best
of omens is to unsheathe our sword in the defence of our country.
35 Under the pretence of receiving the ambassadors of Persia, the
emperor returned to Constantinople, exchanged the thoughts of war
for those of devotion, and disappointed the public hope by his
absence and the choice of his lieutenants. The blind partiality
of fraternal love might excuse the promotion of his brother
Peter, who fled with equal disgrace from the Barbarians, from his
own soldiers and from the inhabitants of a Roman city. That city,
if we may credit the resemblance of name and character, was the
famous Azimuntium, 36 which had alone repelled the tempest of
Attila. The example of her warlike youth was propagated to
succeeding generations; and they obtained, from the first or the
second Justin, an honorable privilege, that their valor should be
always reserved for the defence of their native country. The
brother of Maurice attempted to violate this privilege, and to
mingle a patriot band with the mercenaries of his camp; they
retired to the church, he was not awed by the sanctity of the
place; the people rose in their cause, the gates were shut, the
ramparts were manned; and the cowardice of Peter was found equal
to his arrogance and injustice. The military fame of Commentiolus
37 is the object of satire or comedy rather than of serious
history, since he was even deficient in the vile and vulgar
qualification of personal courage. His solemn councils, strange
evolutions, and secret orders, always supplied an apology for
flight or delay. If he marched against the enemy, the pleasant
valleys of Mount Haemus opposed an insuperable barrier; but in
his retreat, he explored, with fearless curiosity, the most
difficult and obsolete paths, which had almost escaped the memory
of the oldest native. The only blood which he lost was drawn, in
a real or affected malady, by the lancet of a surgeon; and his
health, which felt with exquisite sensibility the approach of the
Barbarians, was uniformly restored by the repose and safety of
the winter season. A prince who could promote and support this
unworthy favorite must derive no glory from the accidental merit
of his colleague Priscus. 38 In five successive battles, which
seem to have been conducted with skill and resolution, seventeen
thousand two hundred Barbarians were made prisoners: near sixty
thousand, with four sons of the chagan, were slain: the Roman
general surprised a peaceful district of the Gepidae, who slept
under the protection of the Avars; and his last trophies were
erected on the banks of the Danube and the Teyss. Since the death
of Trajan the arms of the empire had not penetrated so deeply
into the old Dacia: yet the success of Priscus was transient and
barren; and he was soon recalled by the apprehension that Baian,
with dauntless spirit and recruited forces, was preparing to
avenge his defeat under the walls of Constantinople. 39
34 (return) [ See the march and return of Maurice, in
Theophylact, l. v. c. 16 l. vi. c. 1, 2, 3. If he were a writer
of taste or genius, we might suspect him of an elegant irony: but
Theophylact is surely harmless.]
35 (return) [ Iliad, xii. 243. This noble verse, which unites the
spirit of a hero with the reason of a sage, may prove that Homer
was in every light superior to his age and country.]
36 (return) [ Theophylact, l. vii. c. 3. On the evidence of this
fact, which had not occurred to my memory, the candid reader will
correct and excuse a note in Chapter XXXIV., note 86 of this
History, which hastens the decay of Asimus, or Azimuntium;
another century of patriotism and valor is cheaply purchased by
such a confession.]
37 (return) [ See the shameful conduct of Commentiolus, in
Theophylact, l. ii. c. 10—15, l. vii. c. 13, 14, l. viii. c. 2,
4.]
38 (return) [ See the exploits of Priscus, l. viii. c. 23.]
39 (return) [ The general detail of the war against the Avars may
be traced in the first, second, sixth, seventh, and eighth books
of the history of the emperor Maurice, by Theophylact Simocatta.
As he wrote in the reign of Heraclius, he had no temptation to
flatter; but his want of judgment renders him diffuse in trifles,
and concise in the most interesting facts.]
The theory of war was not more familiar to the camps of Caesar
and Trajan, than to those of Justinian and Maurice. 40 The iron
of Tuscany or Pontus still received the keenest temper from the
skill of the Byzantine workmen. The magazines were plentifully
stored with every species of offensive and defensive arms. In the
construction and use of ships, engines, and fortifications, the
Barbarians admired the superior ingenuity of a people whom they
had so often vanquished in the field. The science of tactics, the
order, evolutions, and stratagems of antiquity, was transcribed
and studied in the books of the Greeks and Romans. But the
solitude or degeneracy of the provinces could no longer supply a
race of men to handle those weapons, to guard those walls, to
navigate those ships, and to reduce the theory of war into bold
and successful practice. The genius of Belisarius and Narses had
been formed without a master, and expired without a disciple.
Neither honor, nor patriotism, nor generous superstition, could
animate the lifeless bodies of slaves and strangers, who had
succeeded to the honors of the legions: it was in the camp alone
that the emperor should have exercised a despotic command; it was
only in the camps that his authority was disobeyed and insulted:
he appeased and inflamed with gold the licentiousness of the
troops; but their vices were inherent, their victories were
accidental, and their costly maintenance exhausted the substance
of a state which they were unable to defend. After a long and
pernicious indulgence, the cure of this inveterate evil was
undertaken by Maurice; but the rash attempt, which drew
destruction on his own head, tended only to aggravate the
disease. A reformer should be exempt from the suspicion of
interest, and he must possess the confidence and esteem of those
whom he proposes to reclaim. The troops of Maurice might listen
to the voice of a victorious leader; they disdained the
admonitions of statesmen and sophists; and, when they received an
edict which deducted from their pay the price of their arms and
clothing, they execrated the avarice of a prince insensible of
the dangers and fatigues from which he had escaped.
The camps both of Asia and Europe were agitated with frequent and
furious seditions; 41 the enraged soldiers of Edessa pursued with
reproaches, with threats, with wounds, their trembling generals;
they overturned the statues of the emperor, cast stones against
the miraculous image of Christ, and either rejected the yoke of
all civil and military laws, or instituted a dangerous model of
voluntary subordination. The monarch, always distant and often
deceived, was incapable of yielding or persisting, according to
the exigence of the moment. But the fear of a general revolt
induced him too readily to accept any act of valor, or any
expression of loyalty, as an atonement for the popular offence;
the new reform was abolished as hastily as it had been announced,
and the troops, instead of punishment and restraint, were
agreeably surprised by a gracious proclamation of immunities and
rewards. But the soldiers accepted without gratitude the tardy
and reluctant gifts of the emperor: their insolence was elated by
the discovery of his weakness and their own strength; and their
mutual hatred was inflamed beyond the desire of forgiveness or
the hope of reconciliation. The historians of the times adopt the
vulgar suspicion, that Maurice conspired to destroy the troops
whom he had labored to reform; the misconduct and favor of
Commentiolus are imputed to this malevolent design; and every age
must condemn the inhumanity of avarice 42 of a prince, who, by
the trifling ransom of six thousand pieces of gold, might have
prevented the massacre of twelve thousand prisoners in the hands
of the chagan. In the just fervor of indignation, an order was
signified to the army of the Danube, that they should spare the
magazines of the province, and establish their winter quarters in
the hostile country of the Avars. The measure of their grievances
was full: they pronounced Maurice unworthy to reign, expelled or
slaughtered his faithful adherents, and, under the command of
Phocas, a simple centurion, returned by hasty marches to the
neighborhood of Constantinople. After a long series of legal
succession, the military disorders of the third century were
again revived; yet such was the novelty of the enterprise, that
the insurgents were awed by their own rashness. They hesitated to
invest their favorite with the vacant purple; and, while they
rejected all treaty with Maurice himself, they held a friendly
correspondence with his son Theodosius, and with Germanus, the
father-in-law of the royal youth. So obscure had been the former
condition of Phocas, that the emperor was ignorant of the name
and character of his rival; but as soon as he learned, that the
centurion, though bold in sedition, was timid in the face of
danger, “Alas!” cried the desponding prince, “if he is a coward,
he will surely be a murderer.”
40 (return) [ Maurice himself composed xii books on the military
art, which are still extant, and have been published (Upsal,
1664) by John Schaeffer, at the end of the Tactics of Arrian,
(Fabricius, Bibliot Graeca, l. iv. c. 8, tom. iii. p. 278,) who
promises to speak more fully of his work in its proper place.]
41 (return) [ See the mutinies under the reign of Maurice, in
Theophylact l iii c. 1—4,.vi. c. 7, 8, 10, l. vii. c. 1 l. viii.
c. 6, &c.]
42 (return) [ Theophylact and Theophanes seem ignorant of the
conspiracy and avarice of Maurice. These charges, so unfavorable
to the memory of that emperor, are first mentioned by the author
of the Paschal Chronicle, (p. 379, 280;) from whence Zonaras
(tom. ii. l. xiv. p. 77, 78) has transcribed them. Cedrenus (p.
399) has followed another computation of the ransom.]
Yet if Constantinople had been firm and faithful, the murderer
might have spent his fury against the walls; and the rebel army
would have been gradually consumed or reconciled by the prudence
of the emperor. In the games of the Circus, which he repeated
with unusual pomp, Maurice disguised, with smiles of confidence,
the anxiety of his heart, condescended to solicit the applause of
the factions, and flattered their pride by accepting from their
respective tribunes a list of nine hundred blues and fifteen
hundred greens, whom he affected to esteem as the solid pillars
of his throne Their treacherous or languid support betrayed his
weakness and hastened his fall: the green faction were the secret
accomplices of the rebels, and the blues recommended lenity and
moderation in a contest with their Roman brethren. The rigid and
parsimonious virtues of Maurice had long since alienated the
hearts of his subjects: as he walked barefoot in a religious
procession, he was rudely assaulted with stones, and his guards
were compelled to present their iron maces in the defence of his
person. A fanatic monk ran through the streets with a drawn
sword, denouncing against him the wrath and the sentence of God;
and a vile plebeian, who represented his countenance and apparel,
was seated on an ass, and pursued by the imprecations of the
multitude. 43 The emperor suspected the popularity of Germanus
with the soldiers and citizens: he feared, he threatened, but he
delayed to strike; the patrician fled to the sanctuary of the
church; the people rose in his defence, the walls were deserted
by the guards, and the lawless city was abandoned to the flames
and rapine of a nocturnal tumult. In a small bark, the
unfortunate Maurice, with his wife and nine children, escaped to
the Asiatic shore; but the violence of the wind compelled him to
land at the church of St. Autonomus, 44 near Chalcedon, from
whence he despatched Theodosius, he eldest son, to implore the
gratitude and friendship of the Persian monarch. For himself, he
refused to fly: his body was tortured with sciatic pains, 45 his
mind was enfeebled by superstition; he patiently awaited the
event of the revolution, and addressed a fervent and public
prayer to the Almighty, that the punishment of his sins might be
inflicted in this world rather than in a future life. After the
abdication of Maurice, the two factions disputed the choice of an
emperor; but the favorite of the blues was rejected by the
jealousy of their antagonists, and Germanus himself was hurried
along by the crowds who rushed to the palace of Hebdomon, seven
miles from the city, to adore the majesty of Phocas the
centurion. A modest wish of resigning the purple to the rank and
merit of Germanus was opposed by his resolution, more obstinate
and equally sincere; the senate and clergy obeyed his summons;
and, as soon as the patriarch was assured of his orthodox belief,
he consecrated the successful usurper in the church of St. John
the Baptist. On the third day, amidst the acclamations of a
thoughtless people, Phocas made his public entry in a chariot
drawn by four white horses: the revolt of the troops was rewarded
by a lavish donative; and the new sovereign, after visiting the
palace, beheld from his throne the games of the hippodrome. In a
dispute of precedency between the two factions, his partial
judgment inclined in favor of the greens. “Remember that Maurice
is still alive,” resounded from the opposite side; and the
indiscreet clamor of the blues admonished and stimulated the
cruelty of the tyrant. The ministers of death were despatched to
Chalcedon: they dragged the emperor from his sanctuary; and the
five sons of Maurice were successively murdered before the eyes
of their agonizing parent. At each stroke, which he felt in his
heart, he found strength to rehearse a pious ejaculation: “Thou
art just, O Lord! and thy judgments are righteous.” And such, in
the last moments, was his rigid attachment to truth and justice,
that he revealed to the soldiers the pious falsehood of a nurse
who presented her own child in the place of a royal infant. 46
The tragic scene was finally closed by the execution of the
emperor himself, in the twentieth year of his reign, and the
sixty-third of his age. The bodies of the father and his five
sons were cast into the sea; their heads were exposed at
Constantinople to the insults or pity of the multitude; and it
was not till some signs of putrefaction had appeared, that Phocas
connived at the private burial of these venerable remains. In
that grave, the faults and errors of Maurice were kindly
interred. His fate alone was remembered; and at the end of twenty
years, in the recital of the history of Theophylact, the mournful
tale was interrupted by the tears of the audience. 47
43 (return) [ In their clamors against Maurice, the people of
Constantinople branded him with the name of Marcionite or
Marcionist; a heresy (says Theophylact, l. viii. c. 9). Did they
only cast out a vague reproach—or had the emperor really listened
to some obscure teacher of those ancient Gnostics?]
44 (return) [ The church of St. Autonomous (whom I have not the
honor to know) was 150 stadia from Constantinople, (Theophylact,
l. viii. c. 9.) The port of Eutropius, where Maurice and his
children were murdered, is described by Gyllius (de Bosphoro
Thracio, l. iii. c. xi.) as one of the two harbors of Chalcedon.]
45 (return) [ The inhabitants of Constantinople were generally
subject; and Theophylact insinuates, (l. viii. c. 9,) that if it
were consistent with the rules of history, he could assign the
medical cause. Yet such a digression would not have been more
impertinent than his inquiry (l. vii. c. 16, 17) into the annual
inundations of the Nile, and all the opinions of the Greek
philosophers on that subject.]
46 (return) [ From this generous attempt, Corneille has deduced
the intricate web of his tragedy of Heraclius, which requires
more than one representation to be clearly understood, (Corneille
de Voltaire, tom. v. p. 300;) and which, after an interval of
some years, is said to have puzzled the author himself,
(Anecdotes Dramatiques, tom. i. p. 422.)]
47 (return) [ The revolt of Phocas and death of Maurice are told
by Theophylact Simocatta, (l. viii. c. 7—12,) the Paschal
Chronicle, (p. 379, 380,) Theophanes, (Chronograph. p. 238-244,)
Zonaras, (tom. ii. l. xiv. p. 77—80,) and Cedrenus, (p.
399—404.)]
Such tears must have flowed in secret, and such compassion would
have been criminal, under the reign of Phocas, who was peaceably
acknowledged in the provinces of the East and West. The images of
the emperor and his wife Leontia were exposed in the Lateran to
the veneration of the clergy and senate of Rome, and afterwards
deposited in the palace of the Caesars, between those of
Constantine and Theodosius. As a subject and a Christian, it was
the duty of Gregory to acquiesce in the established government;
but the joyful applause with which he salutes the fortune of the
assassin, has sullied, with indelible disgrace, the character of
the saint. The successor of the apostles might have inculcated
with decent firmness the guilt of blood, and the necessity of
repentance; he is content to celebrate the deliverance of the
people and the fall of the oppressor; to rejoice that the piety
and benignity of Phocas have been raised by Providence to the
Imperial throne; to pray that his hands may be strengthened
against all his enemies; and to express a wish, perhaps a
prophecy, that, after a long and triumphant reign, he may be
transferred from a temporal to an everlasting kingdom. 48 I have
already traced the steps of a revolution so pleasing, in
Gregory’s opinion, both to heaven and earth; and Phocas does not
appear less hateful in the exercise than in the acquisition of
power. The pencil of an impartial historian has delineated the
portrait of a monster: 49 his diminutive and deformed person, the
closeness of his shaggy eyebrows, his red hair, his beardless
chin, and his cheek disfigured and discolored by a formidable
scar. Ignorant of letters, of laws, and even of arms, he indulged
in the supreme rank a more ample privilege of lust and
drunkenness; and his brutal pleasures were either injurious to
his subjects or disgraceful to himself. Without assuming the
office of a prince, he renounced the profession of a soldier; and
the reign of Phocas afflicted Europe with ignominious peace, and
Asia with desolating war. His savage temper was inflamed by
passion, hardened by fear, and exasperated by resistance or
reproach. The flight of Theodosius to the Persian court had been
intercepted by a rapid pursuit, or a deceitful message: he was
beheaded at Nice, and the last hours of the young prince were
soothed by the comforts of religion and the consciousness of
innocence. Yet his phantom disturbed the repose of the usurper: a
whisper was circulated through the East, that the son of Maurice
was still alive: the people expected their avenger, and the widow
and daughters of the late emperor would have adopted as their son
and brother the vilest of mankind. In the massacre of the
Imperial family, 50 the mercy, or rather the discretion, of
Phocas had spared these unhappy females, and they were decently
confined to a private house. But the spirit of the empress
Constantina, still mindful of her father, her husband, and her
sons, aspired to freedom and revenge. At the dead of night, she
escaped to the sanctuary of St. Sophia; but her tears, and the
gold of her associate Germanus, were insufficient to provoke an
insurrection. Her life was forfeited to revenge, and even to
justice: but the patriarch obtained and pledged an oath for her
safety: a monastery was allotted for her prison, and the widow of
Maurice accepted and abused the lenity of his assassin. The
discovery or the suspicion of a second conspiracy, dissolved the
engagements, and rekindled the fury, of Phocas. A matron who
commanded the respect and pity of mankind, the daughter, wife,
and mother of emperors, was tortured like the vilest malefactor,
to force a confession of her designs and associates; and the
empress Constantina, with her three innocent daughters, was
beheaded at Chalcedon, on the same ground which had been stained
with the blood of her husband and five sons. After such an
example, it would be superfluous to enumerate the names and
sufferings of meaner victims. Their condemnation was seldom
preceded by the forms of trial, and their punishment was
embittered by the refinements of cruelty: their eyes were
pierced, their tongues were torn from the root, the hands and
feet were amputated; some expired under the lash, others in the
flames; others again were transfixed with arrows; and a simple
speedy death was mercy which they could rarely obtain. The
hippodrome, the sacred asylum of the pleasures and the liberty of
the Romans, was polluted with heads and limbs, and mangled
bodies; and the companions of Phocas were the most sensible, that
neither his favor, nor their services, could protect them from a
tyrant, the worthy rival of the Caligulas and Domitians of the
first age of the empire. 51
48 (return) [ Gregor. l. xi. epist. 38, indict. vi. Benignitatem
vestrae pietatis ad Imperiale fastigium pervenisse gaudemus.
Laetentur coeli et exultet terra, et de vestris benignis actibus
universae republicae populus nunc usque vehementer afflictus
hilarescat, &c. This base flattery, the topic of Protestant
invective, is justly censured by the philosopher Bayle,
(Dictionnaire Critique, Gregoire I. Not. H. tom. ii. p. 597 598.)
Cardinal Baronius justifies the pope at the expense of the fallen
emperor.]
49 (return) [ The images of Phocas were destroyed; but even the
malice of his enemies would suffer one copy of such a portrait or
caricature (Cedrenus, p. 404) to escape the flames.]
50 (return) [ The family of Maurice is represented by Ducange,
(Familiae By zantinae, p. 106, 107, 108;) his eldest son
Theodosius had been crowned emperor, when he was no more than
four years and a half old, and he is always joined with his
father in the salutations of Gregory. With the Christian
daughters, Anastasia and Theocteste, I am surprised to find the
Pagan name of Cleopatra.]
51 (return) [ Some of the cruelties of Phocas are marked by
Theophylact, l. viii. c. 13, 14, 15. George of Pisidia, the poet
of Heraclius, styles him (Bell. Avaricum, p. 46, Rome, 1777). The
latter epithet is just—but the corrupter of life was easily
vanquished.]
Chapter XLVI: Troubles In Persia.—Part III.
A daughter of Phocas, his only child, was given in marriage to
the patrician Crispus, 52 and the royal images of the bride and
bridegroom were indiscreetly placed in the circus, by the side of
the emperor. The father must desire that his posterity should
inherit the fruit of his crimes, but the monarch was offended by
this premature and popular association: the tribunes of the green
faction, who accused the officious error of their sculptors, were
condemned to instant death: their lives were granted to the
prayers of the people; but Crispus might reasonably doubt,
whether a jealous usurper could forget and pardon his involuntary
competition. The green faction was alienated by the ingratitude
of Phocas and the loss of their privileges; every province of the
empire was ripe for rebellion; and Heraclius, exarch of Africa,
persisted above two years in refusing all tribute and obedience
to the centurion who disgraced the throne of Constantinople. By
the secret emissaries of Crispus and the senate, the independent
exarch was solicited to save and to govern his country; but his
ambition was chilled by age, and he resigned the dangerous
enterprise to his son Heraclius, and to Nicetas, the son of
Gregory, his friend and lieutenant. The powers of Africa were
armed by the two adventurous youths; they agreed that the one
should navigate the fleet from Carthage to Constantinople, that
the other should lead an army through Egypt and Asia, and that
the Imperial purple should be the reward of diligence and
success. A faint rumor of their undertaking was conveyed to the
ears of Phocas, and the wife and mother of the younger Heraclius
were secured as the hostages of his faith: but the treacherous
heart of Crispus extenuated the distant peril, the means of
defence were neglected or delayed, and the tyrant supinely slept
till the African navy cast anchor in the Hellespont. Their
standard was joined at Abidus by the fugitives and exiles who
thirsted for revenge; the ships of Heraclius, whose lofty masts
were adorned with the holy symbols of religion, 53 steered their
triumphant course through the Propontis; and Phocas beheld from
the windows of the palace his approaching and inevitable fate.
The green faction was tempted, by gifts and promises, to oppose a
feeble and fruitless resistance to the landing of the Africans:
but the people, and even the guards, were determined by the
well-timed defection of Crispus; and the tyrant was seized by a
private enemy, who boldly invaded the solitude of the palace.
Stripped of the diadem and purple, clothed in a vile habit, and
loaded with chains, he was transported in a small boat to the
Imperial galley of Heraclius, who reproached him with the crimes
of his abominable reign. “Wilt thou govern better?” were the last
words of the despair of Phocas. After suffering each variety of
insult and torture, his head was severed from his body, the
mangled trunk was cast into the flames, and the same treatment
was inflicted on the statues of the vain usurper, and the
seditious banner of the green faction. The voice of the clergy,
the senate, and the people, invited Heraclius to ascend the
throne which he had purified from guilt and ignominy; after some
graceful hesitation, he yielded to their entreaties. His
coronation was accompanied by that of his wife Eudoxia; and their
posterity, till the fourth generation, continued to reign over
the empire of the East. The voyage of Heraclius had been easy and
prosperous; the tedious march of Nicetas was not accomplished
before the decision of the contest: but he submitted without a
murmur to the fortune of his friend, and his laudable intentions
were rewarded with an equestrian statue, and a daughter of the
emperor. It was more difficult to trust the fidelity of Crispus,
whose recent services were recompensed by the command of the
Cappadocian army. His arrogance soon provoked, and seemed to
excuse, the ingratitude of his new sovereign. In the presence of
the senate, the son-in-law of Phocas was condemned to embrace the
monastic life; and the sentence was justified by the weighty
observation of Heraclius, that the man who had betrayed his
father could never be faithful to his friend. 54
52 (return) [ In the writers, and in the copies of those writers,
there is such hesitation between the names of Priscus and
Crispus, (Ducange, Fam Byzant. p. 111,) that I have been tempted
to identify the son-in-law of Phocas with the hero five times
victorious over the Avars.]
53 (return) [ According to Theophanes. Cedrenus adds, which
Heraclius bore as a banner in the first Persian expedition. See
George Pisid. Acroas L 140. The manufacture seems to have
flourished; but Foggini, the Roman editor, (p. 26,) is at a loss
to determine whether this picture was an original or a copy.]
54 (return) [ See the tyranny of Phocas and the elevation of
Heraclius, in Chron. Paschal. p. 380—383. Theophanes, p. 242-250.
Nicephorus, p. 3—7. Cedrenus, p. 404—407. Zonaras, tom. ii. l.
xiv. p. 80—82.]
Even after his death the republic was afflicted by the crimes of
Phocas, which armed with a pious cause the most formidable of her
enemies. According to the friendly and equal forms of the
Byzantine and Persian courts, he announced his exaltation to the
throne; and his ambassador Lilius, who had presented him with the
heads of Maurice and his sons, was the best qualified to describe
the circumstances of the tragic scene. 55 However it might be
varnished by fiction or sophistry, Chosroes turned with horror
from the assassin, imprisoned the pretended envoy, disclaimed the
usurper, and declared himself the avenger of his father and
benefactor. The sentiments of grief and resentment, which
humanity would feel, and honor would dictate, promoted on this
occasion the interest of the Persian king; and his interest was
powerfully magnified by the national and religious prejudices of
the Magi and satraps. In a strain of artful adulation, which
assumed the language of freedom, they presumed to censure the
excess of his gratitude and friendship for the Greeks; a nation
with whom it was dangerous to conclude either peace or alliance;
whose superstition was devoid of truth and justice, and who must
be incapable of any virtue, since they could perpetrate the most
atrocious of crimes, the impious murder of their sovereign. 56
For the crime of an ambitious centurion, the nation which he
oppressed was chastised with the calamities of war; and the same
calamities, at the end of twenty years, were retaliated and
redoubled on the heads of the Persians. 57 The general who had
restored Chosroes to the throne still commanded in the East; and
the name of Narses was the formidable sound with which the
Assyrian mothers were accustomed to terrify their infants. It is
not improbable, that a native subject of Persia should encourage
his master and his friend to deliver and possess the provinces of
Asia. It is still more probable, that Chosroes should animate his
troops by the assurance that the sword which they dreaded the
most would remain in its scabbard, or be drawn in their favor.
The hero could not depend on the faith of a tyrant; and the
tyrant was conscious how little he deserved the obedience of a
hero. Narses was removed from his military command; he reared an
independent standard at Hierapolis, in Syria: he was betrayed by
fallacious promises, and burnt alive in the market-place of
Constantinople. Deprived of the only chief whom they could fear
or esteem, the bands which he had led to victory were twice
broken by the cavalry, trampled by the elephants, and pierced by
the arrows of the Barbarians; and a great number of the captives
were beheaded on the field of battle by the sentence of the
victor, who might justly condemn these seditious mercenaries as
the authors or accomplices of the death of Maurice. Under the
reign of Phocas, the fortifications of Merdin, Dara, Amida, and
Edessa, were successively besieged, reduced, and destroyed, by
the Persian monarch: he passed the Euphrates, occupied the Syrian
cities, Hierapolis, Chalcis, and Berrhaea or Aleppo, and soon
encompassed the walls of Antioch with his irresistible arms. The
rapid tide of success discloses the decay of the empire, the
incapacity of Phocas, and the disaffection of his subjects; and
Chosroes provided a decent apology for their submission or
revolt, by an impostor, who attended his camp as the son of
Maurice 58 and the lawful heir of the monarchy.
55 (return) [ Theophylact, l. viii. c. 15. The life of Maurice
was composed about the year 628 (l. viii. c. 13) by Theophylact
Simocatta, ex-præfect, a native of Egypt. Photius, who gives an
ample extract of the work, (cod. lxv. p. 81—100,) gently reproves
the affectation and allegory of the style. His preface is a
dialogue between Philosophy and History; they seat themselves
under a plane-tree, and the latter touches her lyre.]
56 (return) [ Christianis nec pactum esse, nec fidem nec foedus
..... quod si ulla illis fides fuisset, regem suum non
occidissent. Eutych. Annales tom. ii. p. 211, vers. Pocock.]
57 (return) [ We must now, for some ages, take our leave of
contemporary historians, and descend, if it be a descent, from
the affectation of rhetoric to the rude simplicity of chronicles
and abridgments. Those of Theophanes (Chronograph. p. 244—279)
and Nicephorus (p. 3—16) supply a regular, but imperfect, series
of the Persian war; and for any additional facts I quote my
special authorities. Theophanes, a courtier who became a monk,
was born A.D. 748; Nicephorus patriarch of Constantinople, who
died A.D. 829, was somewhat younger: they both suffered in the
cause of images Hankius, de Scriptoribus Byzantinis, p. 200-246.]
58 (return) [ The Persian historians have been themselves
deceived: but Theophanes (p. 244) accuses Chosroes of the fraud
and falsehood; and Eutychius believes (Annal. tom. ii. p. 212)
that the son of Maurice, who was saved from the assassins, lived
and died a monk on Mount Sinai.]
The first intelligence from the East which Heraclius received, 59
was that of the loss of Antioch; but the aged metropolis, so
often overturned by earthquakes, and pillaged by the enemy, could
supply but a small and languid stream of treasure and blood. The
Persians were equally successful, and more fortunate, in the sack
of Caesarea, the capital of Cappadocia; and as they advanced
beyond the ramparts of the frontier, the boundary of ancient war,
they found a less obstinate resistance and a more plentiful
harvest. The pleasant vale of Damascus has been adorned in every
age with a royal city: her obscure felicity has hitherto escaped
the historian of the Roman empire: but Chosroes reposed his
troops in the paradise of Damascus before he ascended the hills
of Libanus, or invaded the cities of the Phœnician coast. The
conquest of Jerusalem, 60 which had been meditated by Nushirvan,
was achieved by the zeal and avarice of his grandson; the ruin of
the proudest monument of Christianity was vehemently urged by the
intolerant spirit of the Magi; and he could enlist for this holy
warfare with an army of six-and-twenty thousand Jews, whose
furious bigotry might compensate, in some degree, for the want of
valor and discipline. 6011 After the reduction of Galilee, and
the region beyond the Jordan, whose resistance appears to have
delayed the fate of the capital, Jerusalem itself was taken by
assault. The sepulchre of Christ, and the stately churches of
Helena and Constantine, were consumed, or at least damaged, by
the flames; the devout offerings of three hundred years were
rifled in one sacrilegious day; the Patriarch Zachariah, and the
true cross, were transported into Persia; and the massacre of
ninety thousand Christians is imputed to the Jews and Arabs, who
swelled the disorder of the Persian march. The fugitives of
Palestine were entertained at Alexandria by the charity of John
the Archbishop, who is distinguished among a crowd of saints by
the epithet of almsgiver: 61 and the revenues of the church, with
a treasure of three hundred thousand pounds, were restored to the
true proprietors, the poor of every country and every
denomination. But Egypt itself, the only province which had been
exempt, since the time of Diocletian, from foreign and domestic
war, was again subdued by the successors of Cyrus. Pelusium, the
key of that impervious country, was surprised by the cavalry of
the Persians: they passed, with impunity, the innumerable
channels of the Delta, and explored the long valley of the Nile,
from the pyramids of Memphis to the confines of Aethiopia.
Alexandria might have been relieved by a naval force, but the
archbishop and the præfect embarked for Cyprus; and Chosroes
entered the second city of the empire, which still preserved a
wealthy remnant of industry and commerce. His western trophy was
erected, not on the walls of Carthage, 62 but in the neighborhood
of Tripoli; the Greek colonies of Cyrene were finally extirpated;
and the conqueror, treading in the footsteps of Alexander,
returned in triumph through the sands of the Libyan desert. In
the same campaign, another army advanced from the Euphrates to
the Thracian Bosphorus; Chalcedon surrendered after a long siege,
and a Persian camp was maintained above ten years in the presence
of Constantinople. The sea-coast of Pontus, the city of Ancyra,
and the Isle of Rhodes, are enumerated among the last conquests
of the great king; and if Chosroes had possessed any maritime
power, his boundless ambition would have spread slavery and
desolation over the provinces of Europe.
59 (return) [ Eutychius dates all the losses of the empire under
the reign of Phocas; an error which saves the honor of Heraclius,
whom he brings not from Carthage, but Salonica, with a fleet
laden with vegetables for the relief of Constantinople, (Annal.
tom. ii. p. 223, 224.) The other Christians of the East,
Barhebraeus, (apud Asseman, Bibliothec. Oriental. tom. iii. p.
412, 413,) Elmacin, (Hist. Saracen. p. 13—16,) Abulpharagius,
(Dynast. p. 98, 99,) are more sincere and accurate. The years of
the Persian war are disposed in the chronology of Pagi.]
60 (return) [ On the conquest of Jerusalem, an event so
interesting to the church, see the Annals of Eutychius, (tom. ii.
p. 212—223,) and the lamentations of the monk Antiochus, (apud
Baronium, Annal. Eccles. A.D. 614, No. 16—26,) whose one hundred
and twenty-nine homilies are still extant, if what no one reads
may be said to be extant.]
6011 (return) [ See Hist. of Jews, vol. iii. p. 240.—M.]
61 (return) [ The life of this worthy saint is composed by
Leontius, a contemporary bishop; and I find in Baronius (Annal.
Eccles. A.D. 610, No. 10, &c.) and Fleury (tom. viii. p. 235-242)
sufficient extracts of this edifying work.]
62 (return) [ The error of Baronius, and many others who have
carried the arms of Chosroes to Carthage instead of Chalcedon, is
founded on the near resemblance of the Greek words, in the text
of Theophanes, &c., which have been sometimes confounded by
transcribers, and sometimes by critics.]
From the long-disputed banks of the Tigris and Euphrates, the
reign of the grandson of Nushirvan was suddenly extended to the
Hellespont and the Nile, the ancient limits of the Persian
monarchy. But the provinces, which had been fashioned by the
habits of six hundred years to the virtues and vices of the Roman
government, supported with reluctance the yoke of the Barbarians.
The idea of a republic was kept alive by the institutions, or at
least by the writings, of the Greeks and Romans, and the subjects
of Heraclius had been educated to pronounce the words of liberty
and law. But it has always been the pride and policy of Oriental
princes to display the titles and attributes of their
omnipotence; to upbraid a nation of slaves with their true name
and abject condition, and to enforce, by cruel and insolent
threats, the rigor of their absolute commands. The Christians of
the East were scandalized by the worship of fire, and the impious
doctrine of the two principles: the Magi were not less intolerant
than the bishops; and the martyrdom of some native Persians, who
had deserted the religion of Zoroaster, 63 was conceived to be
the prelude of a fierce and general persecution. By the
oppressive laws of Justinian, the adversaries of the church were
made the enemies of the state; the alliance of the Jews,
Nestorians, and Jacobites, had contributed to the success of
Chosroes, and his partial favor to the sectaries provoked the
hatred and fears of the Catholic clergy. Conscious of their fear
and hatred, the Persian conqueror governed his new subjects with
an iron sceptre; and, as if he suspected the stability of his
dominion, he exhausted their wealth by exorbitant tributes and
licentious rapine despoiled or demolished the temples of the
East; and transported to his hereditary realms the gold, the
silver, the precious marbles, the arts, and the artists of the
Asiatic cities. In the obscure picture of the calamities of the
empire, 64 it is not easy to discern the figure of Chosroes
himself, to separate his actions from those of his lieutenants,
or to ascertain his personal merit in the general blaze of glory
and magnificence. He enjoyed with ostentation the fruits of
victory, and frequently retired from the hardships of war to the
luxury of the palace. But in the space of twenty-four years, he
was deterred by superstition or resentment from approaching the
gates of Ctesiphon: and his favorite residence of Artemita, or
Dastagerd, was situate beyond the Tigris, about sixty miles to
the north of the capital. 65 The adjacent pastures were covered
with flocks and herds: the paradise or park was replenished with
pheasants, peacocks, ostriches, roebucks, and wild boars, and the
noble game of lions and tigers was sometimes turned loose for the
bolder pleasures of the chase. Nine hundred and sixty elephants
were maintained for the use or splendor of the great king: his
tents and baggage were carried into the field by twelve thousand
great camels and eight thousand of a smaller size; 66 and the
royal stables were filled with six thousand mules and horses,
among whom the names of Shebdiz and Barid are renowned for their
speed or beauty. 6611 Six thousand guards successively mounted
before the palace gate; the service of the interior apartments
was performed by twelve thousand slaves, and in the number of
three thousand virgins, the fairest of Asia, some happy concubine
might console her master for the age or the indifference of Sira.
The various treasures of gold, silver, gems, silks, and
aromatics, were deposited in a hundred subterraneous vaults and
the chamber Badaverd denoted the accidental gift of the winds
which had wafted the spoils of Heraclius into one of the Syrian
harbors of his rival. The vice of flattery, and perhaps of
fiction, is not ashamed to compute the thirty thousand rich
hangings that adorned the walls; the forty thousand columns of
silver, or more probably of marble, and plated wood, that
supported the roof; and the thousand globes of gold suspended in
the dome, to imitate the motions of the planets and the
constellations of the zodiac. 67 While the Persian monarch
contemplated the wonders of his art and power, he received an
epistle from an obscure citizen of Mecca, inviting him to
acknowledge Mahomet as the apostle of God. He rejected the
invitation, and tore the epistle. “It is thus,” exclaimed the
Arabian prophet, “that God will tear the kingdom, and reject the
supplications of Chosroes.” 68 6811 Placed on the verge of the
two great empires of the East, Mahomet observed with secret joy
the progress of their mutual destruction; and in the midst of the
Persian triumphs, he ventured to foretell, that before many years
should elapse, victory should again return to the banners of the
Romans. 69
63 (return) [ The genuine acts of St. Anastasius are published in
those of the with general council, from whence Baronius (Annal.
Eccles. A.D. 614, 626, 627) and Butler (Lives of the Saints, vol.
i. p. 242—248) have taken their accounts. The holy martyr
deserted from the Persian to the Roman army, became a monk at
Jerusalem, and insulted the worship of the Magi, which was then
established at Caesarea in Palestine.]
64 (return) [ Abulpharagius, Dynast. p. 99. Elmacin, Hist.
Saracen. p. 14.]
65 (return) [ D’Anville, Mem. de l’Academie des Inscriptions,
tom. xxxii. p. 568—571.]
66 (return) [ The difference between the two races consists in
one or two humps; the dromedary has only one; the size of the
proper camel is larger; the country he comes from, Turkistan or
Bactriana; the dromedary is confined to Arabia and Africa.
Buffon, Hist. Naturelle, tom. xi. p. 211, &c. Aristot. Hist.
Animal. tom. i. l. ii. c. 1, tom. ii. p. 185.]
6611 (return) [ The ruins of these scenes of Khoosroo’s
magnificence have been visited by Sir R. K. Porter. At the ruins
of Tokht i Bostan, he saw a gorgeous picture of a hunt,
singularly illustrative of this passage. Travels, vol. ii. p.
204. Kisra Shirene, which he afterwards examined, appears to have
been the palace of Dastagerd. Vol. ii. p. 173—175.—M.]
67 (return) [ Theophanes, Chronograph. p. 268. D’Herbelot,
Bibliotheque Orientale, p. 997. The Greeks describe the decay,
the Persians the splendor, of Dastagerd; but the former speak
from the modest witness of the eye, the latter from the vague
report of the ear.]
68 (return) [ The historians of Mahomet, Abulfeda (in Vit.
Mohammed, p. 92, 93) and Gagnier, (Vie de Mahomet, tom. ii. p.
247,) date this embassy in the viith year of the Hegira, which
commences A.D. 628, May 11. Their chronology is erroneous, since
Chosroes died in the month of February of the same year, (Pagi,
Critica, tom. ii. p. 779.) The count de Boulainvilliers (Vie de
Mahomed, p. 327, 328) places this embassy about A.D. 615, soon
after the conquest of Palestine. Yet Mahomet would scarcely have
ventured so soon on so bold a step.]
6811 (return) [ Khoosroo Purveez was encamped on the banks of the
Karasoo River when he received the letter of Mahomed. He tore the
letter and threw it into the Karasoo. For this action, the
moderate author of the Zeenut-ul-Tuarikh calls him a wretch, and
rejoices in all his subsequent misfortunes. These impressions
still exist. I remarked to a Persian, when encamped near the
Karasoo, in 1800, that the banks were very high, which must make
it difficult to apply its waters to irrigation. “It once
fertilized the whole country,” said the zealous Mahomedan, “but
its channel sunk with honor from its banks, when that madman,
Khoosroo, threw our holy Prophet’s letter into its stream; which
has ever since been accursed and useless.” Malcolm’s Persia, vol.
i. p. 126—M.]
69 (return) [ See the xxxth chapter of the Koran, entitled the
Greeks. Our honest and learned translator, Sale, (p. 330, 331,)
fairly states this conjecture, guess, wager, of Mahomet; but
Boulainvilliers, (p. 329—344,) with wicked intentions, labors to
establish this evident prophecy of a future event, which must, in
his opinion, embarrass the Christian polemics.]
At the time when this prediction is said to have been delivered,
no prophecy could be more distant from its accomplishment, since
the first twelve years of Heraclius announced the approaching
dissolution of the empire. If the motives of Chosroes had been
pure and honorable, he must have ended the quarrel with the death
of Phocas, and he would have embraced, as his best ally, the
fortunate African who had so generously avenged the injuries of
his benefactor Maurice. The prosecution of the war revealed the
true character of the Barbarian; and the suppliant embassies of
Heraclius to beseech his clemency, that he would spare the
innocent, accept a tribute, and give peace to the world, were
rejected with contemptuous silence or insolent menace. Syria,
Egypt, and the provinces of Asia, were subdued by the Persian
arms, while Europe, from the confines of Istria to the long wall
of Thrace, was oppressed by the Avars, unsatiated with the blood
and rapine of the Italian war. They had coolly massacred their
male captives in the sacred field of Pannonia; the women and
children were reduced to servitude, and the noblest virgins were
abandoned to the promiscuous lust of the Barbarians. The amorous
matron who opened the gates of Friuli passed a short night in the
arms of her royal lover; the next evening, Romilda was condemned
to the embraces of twelve Avars, and the third day the Lombard
princess was impaled in the sight of the camp, while the chagan
observed with a cruel smile, that such a husband was the fit
recompense of her lewdness and perfidy. 70 By these implacable
enemies, Heraclius, on either side, was insulted and besieged:
and the Roman empire was reduced to the walls of Constantinople,
with the remnant of Greece, Italy, and Africa, and some maritime
cities, from Tyre to Trebizond, of the Asiatic coast. After the
loss of Egypt, the capital was afflicted by famine and
pestilence; and the emperor, incapable of resistance, and
hopeless of relief, had resolved to transfer his person and
government to the more secure residence of Carthage. His ships
were already laden with the treasures of the palace; but his
flight was arrested by the patriarch, who armed the powers of
religion in the defence of his country; led Heraclius to the
altar of St. Sophia, and extorted a solemn oath, that he would
live and die with the people whom God had intrusted to his care.
The chagan was encamped in the plains of Thrace; but he
dissembled his perfidious designs, and solicited an interview
with the emperor near the town of Heraclea. Their reconciliation
was celebrated with equestrian games; the senate and people, in
their gayest apparel, resorted to the festival of peace; and the
Avars beheld, with envy and desire, the spectacle of Roman
luxury. On a sudden the hippodrome was encompassed by the
Scythian cavalry, who had pressed their secret and nocturnal
march: the tremendous sound of the chagan’s whip gave the signal
of the assault, and Heraclius, wrapping his diadem round his arm,
was saved with extreme hazard, by the fleetness of his horse. So
rapid was the pursuit, that the Avars almost entered the golden
gate of Constantinople with the flying crowds: 71 but the plunder
of the suburbs rewarded their treason, and they transported
beyond the Danube two hundred and seventy thousand captives. On
the shore of Chalcedon, the emperor held a safer conference with
a more honorable foe, who, before Heraclius descended from his
galley, saluted with reverence and pity the majesty of the
purple. The friendly offer of Sain, the Persian general, to
conduct an embassy to the presence of the great king, was
accepted with the warmest gratitude, and the prayer for pardon
and peace was humbly presented by the Praetorian præfect, the
præfect of the city, and one of the first ecclesiastics of the
patriarchal church. 72 But the lieutenant of Chosroes had fatally
mistaken the intentions of his master. “It was not an embassy,”
said the tyrant of Asia, “it was the person of Heraclius, bound
in chains, that he should have brought to the foot of my throne.
I will never give peace to the emperor of Rome, till he had
abjured his crucified God, and embraced the worship of the sun.”
Sain was flayed alive, according to the inhuman practice of his
country; and the separate and rigorous confinement of the
ambassadors violated the law of nations, and the faith of an
express stipulation. Yet the experience of six years at length
persuaded the Persian monarch to renounce the conquest of
Constantinople, and to specify the annual tribute or ransom of
the Roman empire; a thousand talents of gold, a thousand talents
of silver, a thousand silk robes, a thousand horses, and a
thousand virgins. Heraclius subscribed these ignominious terms;
but the time and space which he obtained to collect such
treasures from the poverty of the East, was industriously
employed in the preparations of a bold and desperate attack.
70 (return) [Footnote 70: Paul Warnefrid, de Gestis
Langobardorum, l. iv. c. 38, 42. Muratori, Annali d’Italia, tom.
v. p. 305, &c.]
71 (return) [ The Paschal Chronicle, which sometimes introduces
fragments of history into a barren list of names and dates, gives
the best account of the treason of the Avars, p. 389, 390. The
number of captives is added by Nicephorus.]