ITALIAN ENGRAVING: THE FLORENTINES

Engraving in Italy differs, in many essentials, from the art as

practised in Germany. Germany may claim priority in point of time, but

it is doubtful whether the Florentines--for in Florence, and among

the goldsmiths, the art took its rise in Italy--in the beginning were

influenced by, or even acquainted with, the work of their northern

contemporaries. In Germany the designer and the engraver were one, and

some of the greatest masters embodied their finest conceptions in their

prints. We may truly say that the world-wide reputation which Dürer

and Schongauer have enjoyed for four centuries and more, rests almost

entirely upon their engraved, rather than upon their painted, work.

In Italy it was otherwise. There, with a few signal exceptions,

engraving was used merely as a convenient method of multiplying an

existing design. It may be that we owe to this fact both the color

of the ink used in these early Florentine prints, and the method of

taking impressions. This would seem, in many cases, to be by rubbing

rather than by the use of the roller press, which appears to have been

known and used in the North substantially from the very beginning. The

Florentine, aiming to duplicate a drawing in silver-point or wash,

would naturally endeavor to approximate the color of his original.

Consequently we do not find the lustrous black impressions, strongly

printed, which are the prize of the collector of early German

engravings.

Vasari’s story of the invention of engraving by MASO FINIGUERRA

(1426-1464) was long ago disproved, and for a time it seemed as though

Finiguerra and his work were likely to be consigned to that limbo of

the legendary from which Baldini--at one time accredited with many

prints--is only just now emerging. Yet Finiguerra, although not the

“inventor” of the art, is, beyond peradventure, the most important

influence in early Italian engraving, not only on account of his own

work on copper, but still more through the Picture-Chronicle, which

served as an inspiration to the artists working in his School and

continuing his tradition after his death. So that Vasari’s tale, though

not accurate in the matter of fact, was veracious in the larger sense.

[Illustration: ANONYMOUS FLORENTINE, XV CENTURY. PROFILE PORTRAIT OF A

LADY

Size of the original engraving, 8⅞ × 5⅝ inches

In the Royal Print Room, Berlin]

[Illustration: ANONYMOUS FLORENTINE, XV CENTURY. WILD ANIMALS HUNTING

AND FIGHTING

Size of the original engraving, 10⅛ × 14¾ inches

In the British Museum]

The Picture-Chronicle is a book of drawings illustrating the History

of the World, and evidently proceeds from the hand and workshop of a

Florentine goldsmith-engraver of about 1460. It was acquired by

the British Museum from Mr. Ruskin in 1888. The drawings are in pen

and ink and wash, often reinforced with open pen-shading like that

imitated later by the Broad Manner engravers. At its best the work

has the true early Renaissance combination of archaic strength with

attractive naiveté--the ornamental detail carried out with a masterly

power of pen, and with the patient delight of one who is by instinct

and training above all things a jeweler.

Finiguerra’s fame as the leading worker in niello was firmly

established by 1450; and although we cannot assign certainly any

engraving by him to a date earlier than 1460, there is a group of

Florentine primitives which may be placed between the years 1450 and

1460, thus antedating Finiguerra’s first plate by about ten years. The

most beautiful of these early prints in conception, and the purest in

execution, is the _Profile Portrait of a Lady_, a single impression of

which has come down to us and is now in Berlin. In style it recalls the

paintings of Piero della Francesca, Verrocchio, Uccello, or Pollaiuolo,

and although it would be unwise to attribute it to any known master,

there is a sensitive quality in the drawing, and a restraint, which

differentiates it from any other print of this period.

Among the engravings which may be by Finiguerra himself, one of

the most interesting is the plate of _Wild Animals Hunting and

Fighting_, wherein we see a number of motives taken directly from the

Picture-Chronicle--motives which reappear again and again in works

undoubtedly by other hands. This print, as also the _Encounter of a

Hunting Party with a Family of Wild Folk_, is unique. In the last-named

we see a number of motives repeated from the _Wild Animals Hunting and

Fighting_: such as the boar being pulled down by two hounds, the hound

chasing a hare, in the upper right corner; and the dog, slightly to the

left, devouring the entrails of yet another hare.

The _Road to Calvary and the Crucifixion_ is a far more elaborate and

important composition, and in this engraving we see that which is

especially noteworthy in the _Judgment Hall of Pilate_--the largest

and most important of all the Fine Manner prints--the goldsmith’s love

of ornament. In the _Judgment Hall of Pilate_ the head-dresses, and

especially the armor, are highly elaborate, while the architecture

itself is overlaid with ornate decoration directly drawn from the

Picture-Chronicle. In the only known impression the plate seems to have

been re-worked, in the Broad Manner, by a later hand.

[Illustration: ANONYMOUS FLORENTINE, XV CENTURY. TRIUMPHAL PROCESSION

OF BACCHUS AND ARIADNE

Size of the original engraving, 8⅛ × 22 inches

In the British Museum]

[Illustration: ANONYMOUS FLORENTINE, XV CENTURY. JUPITER

Size of the original engraving, 12⅝ × 8½ inches

In the British Museum]

Somewhat later in date, by an engraver of the Finiguerra School, is the

_Triumphal Procession of_ _Bacchus and Ariadne_, the most joyous of

all Florentine engravings. The original design was attributed at one

time to Botticelli; and although, as Herbert P. Horne has shown, it

cannot be by this master, it is similar in style to his compositions.

Whatever the immediate original, it shows marked traces of classical

influences, and its motive is directly derived from antique

sculpture--a sarcophagus in all probability. “The splendid design has

suffered not only from the feebleness of the engraving, but also from

the florid manner in which the engraver has exaggerated some of the

decorative details and added others.... In spite of the feebleness of

its execution it remains an incomparably greater work of art than any

other print in the Fine Manner.”[2]

[2] Sandro Botticelli. By Herbert P. Horne. London: George Bell & Sons.

1908. p. 84.

The Fine Manner, in which all of the engravings hitherto mentioned

are executed, owes its name to the method employed. The engraver has

incised his outlines upon the plate--probably unbeaten copper or

some even softer metal--and for his shading has employed a system of

delicate strokes, laid close to one another and overlaid with two, and,

at times, three, sets of cross-hatching. Such engravings, when printed,

as is usually the case, in a greenish or grayish ink, give a result

similar to a wash drawing. In the Broad Manner the style of engraving

is based upon that of pen drawing, with open, diagonal shade strokes

and without cross-hatching. The Broad Manner was finally developed by

Pollaiuolo and Mantegna, who modified it by a series of delicate lines

laid at an acute angle to the heavier shadings, blending the main lines

into a harmonious whole.

“None of the sciences that descended from antiquity,” writes Arthur

M. Hind,[3] “possessed a firmer hold on the popular imagination of

the Middle Ages than that of Astrology. That science took as its

foundation the ancient conception of the universe, with the earth as

the centre round which all the heavenly bodies revolved in the space

of a day and a night. Encircling the earth were the successive spheres

of water, air, fire, the seven planets (Moon, Mercury, Venus, Sun,

Mars, Jupiter, Saturn), the firmament with the constellations (the

_cœlum crystallinum_), and the Primum Mobile. To each of the planets

were ascribed attributes according to the traditional character of

the deity whose name it bore, and these attributes were regarded as

transmissible under certain conditions to mankind. The influence of the

planets depended on their position in the heavens in respect of the

various constellations, with which each had different relations. Each

planet had what was called its ‘house’ in one of the constellations,

and according to its position relative to these was said to be in the

‘ascendant’ or ‘descendant’. In regard to individual human beings the

date of birth was the decisive point, and the degree of influence

transmitted from the planets depended on the respective degree of

‘ascendance’ or ‘descendance’ at the particular epoch.”

[3] Catalogue of Early Italian Engravings ... in the British Museum. By

Arthur Mayger Hind. London. 1910. pp. 49-50.

The planets and their influences afforded subject matter for many

artists of the fifteenth and sixteenth centuries, and the finest and

most important series is that engraved in the Fine Manner by an artist

of the Finiguerra School, who has, as usual, drawn directly upon the

Picture-Chronicle for his ornamental accessories. We can reproduce two

only from the set of seven--_Jupiter_ and _Mercury_. The inscription

beneath _Jupiter_ reads, in part, as follows: “Jupiter is a male planet

in the sixth sphere, warm and moist, temperate by nature, and of gentle

disposition; he is sanguine, cheerful, liberal, eloquent; he loves

fine clothes, is handsome and ruddy of aspect, and looks toward the

Earth. Tin is his metal; his days are Sunday and Thursday, with the

first, eighth, fifteenth and twenty-fourth hours; his night is that of

Wednesday; he is friendly to the Moon, hostile to Mars....” In the

landscape we again meet with several of the stock Finiguerra motives,

the muzzled hounds, the dog chasing the hare, etc. Of especial interest

is the group at the right--“wing-bearing Dante who flew through Hell,

through the starry Heavens and o’er the intermediate hill of Purgatory

beneath the beauteous brows of Beatrice; and Petrarch too, who tells

again the tale of Cupid’s triumph; and the man who, in ten days,

portrays a hundred stories (Boccaccio).”

_Mercury_--“eloquent and inventive ... slender of figure, tall and

well grown, with delicate lips. Quicksilver is his metal”--sets forth

various applications of the arts and sciences. Especially interesting

is the goldsmith’s shop at the left, where we see an engraver actually

at work upon a plate. The goldsmith is seated, his apprentice behind

him, as a prospective purchaser examines a richly ornamented vessel.

In the foreground a sculptor is chiseling his statue, while, standing

above, on a scaffolding, a fresco painter is actively at work--a record

of the Florence of 1460 or thereabouts, full of interest for us.

[Illustration: ANONYMOUS FLORENTINE, XV CENTURY. MERCURY

Size of the original engraving, 12¾ × 8½ inches

In the British Museum]

[Illustration: ANONYMOUS FLORENTINE, XV CENTURY. LADY WITH A UNICORN

Size of the original engraving, 6¼ inches in diameter

In the British Museum]

To a slightly later date, 1465-1470, belong the group of Fine Manner

prints, known as the OTTO PRINTS, also emanating from the

Finiguerra workshop. They are not a series, in any true sense, and owe

their name--also their fortunate preservation--to the accidental

circumstance of their having belonged at one time to Peter Ernst Otto,

a merchant and collector of Leipzig. The purpose served by these

prints--twenty-four in all--was the decoration of box lids, either as

patterns to be copied, in the case of metal caskets, or to be colored

and pasted on the lids of wooden boxes. The escutcheons are usually

left blank, to be filled in by hand with the device of the donor or the

recipient, or with some appropriate sentiment.

In the print entitled _Two Heads in Medallions and Two Hunting Scenes_

we again meet with the animal motives taken from the Picture-Chronicle.

One of the most charming is the _Lady with a Unicorn_ (Chastity), in

its arrangement suggestive of the beautiful drawing by Leonardo da

Vinci in the British Museum; and its symbolic meaning is doubtless

the same. “The unicorn,” writes Leonardo in his “Bestiarius,” “is

distinguished for lack of moderation and self-control. His passionate

love of young women makes him entirely forget his shyness and ferocity.

Oblivious of all dangers, he comes straight to the seated maiden and

falling asleep in her lap is then caught by the hunter.” The ermine,

likewise a sign of chastity, is to be seen at the right, gazing upward

into Marietta’s face.

Still later than the Otto prints, and greatly inferior to them in

execution, are the three illustrations for _Il Monte Sancto di Dio_, of

1477; and the nineteen engravings for Dante’s _Divina Commedia_, with

Landino’s Commentary, of 1481. _Il Monte Sancto di Dio_ is the first

book in Italy or in Germany in which there appear illustrations from

engraved plates printed on the text page. This entailed much additional

labor, and was soon discontinued in favor of the wood-block, which

could be printed simultaneously with the letterpress, and was not taken

up again until nearly the end of the sixteenth century.

Alike by tradition and internal evidence, Botticelli is unquestionably

the author of the Dante designs; but no artist has been suggested as

the probable designer of the three illustrations for _Il Monte Sancto

di Dio_. In the first illustration the costume and general attitude

of the young gallant to the left are strongly reminiscent of the Otto

prints. The lower portion of the plate shows all the characteristics of

the Fine Manner, but the angel heads are treated in a simpler and more

open linear method. _The Christian’s Ascent to the Glory of Paradise_

is allegorically represented by a ladder placed firmly in the ground

of widespread Knowledge and Humility, and reaching up to the triple

mountain of Faith, Hope, and Charity, on the summit of which stands the

Saviour. This ladder is called Perseverance, one of its sides being

Prayer, the other Sacrament. It has eleven steps: Prudence, Temperance,

Fortitude, Justice, etc.

[Illustration: ANONYMOUS FLORENTINE, XV CENTURY. THE CHRISTIAN’S

ASCENT TO THE GLORY OF PARADISE. FROM “IL MONTE SANCTO DI DIO,”

FLORENCE, 1477

Size of the original engraving, 9⅞ × 7 inches

In the Fogg Art Museum, Harvard University]

[Illustration: ANONYMOUS FLORENTINE, XV CENTURY. DANTE AND VIRGIL

WITH THE VISION OF BEATRICE. FROM THE “DIVINA COMMEDIA,”

FLORENCE, 1481

Size of the original engraving, 3½ × 6⅞ inches

In the Museum of Fine Arts, Boston]

The second illustration depicts the glory of Paradise; the third the

punishment of Hell, the main motives of the last-named being adapted

from the fresco attributed to Orcagna, in the Campo Santo at Pisa.

In the illustrations to the _Divina Commedia_, of 1481, there is little

left of the beauty which the original designs must have possessed.

They are, indeed, “disguised into puerility by the feebleness of

the engraver”; but, none the less, they remain, with the exception

of Botticelli’s superb series of drawings on vellum, in Berlin and

in the Vatican, unquestionably the best, one might say the _only_,

satisfactory illustrations of Dante’s text. No known copy contains

more than the first three engravings printed directly upon the page

itself. In every other case, where a greater number of illustrations

appear, they are printed separately and pasted in place, indicating the

difficulty experienced by the Renaissance printer in making his plates

register with the letterpress.

The first print of the series shows Dante lost in the wood, emerging

therefrom, and his meeting with Virgil--three subjects on a single

plate. The second represents _Dante and Virgil with the Vision_ _of

Beatrice_. Dante and Virgil are seen twice--first to the left, where

Dante doubts whether to follow the guidance of Virgil further, and

again on the slope of the hill to the right, where Virgil relates how

the vision of Beatrice appeared to him. Near the summit of the rocky

mountain is seen the entrance to Hell.

“Of the extant engravings in the Broad Manner, unquestionably the most

remarkable is the large print on two sheets of the _Assumption of the

Virgin_, after Botticelli. The original design [no longer known to

exist], whether drawing or painting, from which this engraving was

taken, must have been among the grandest and most vigorous works of

the last period of Botticelli’s art. The large and rugged treatment of

the figures of the apostles, their strange mane-like hair and beards,

their fervent and agitated gestures and attitudes, lend to this part of

the design a forcible and primitive character, which recalls, though

largely, perhaps, in an accidental fashion, the grand and impressive

art of Andrea del Castagno. Not less vigorous in conception, but of

greater beauty of form and movement, is the figure of the Virgin, and

the motive and arrangement of the angels who form a ‘mandorla’ around

her are among the most lovely and imaginative of the many inventions

of the kind which Botticelli has left us.”[4] In the distant valley

is a view of Rome showing the Pantheon, the Column of Trajan, the

Colosseum, and other buildings.

[4] Sandro Botticelli. By Herbert P. Horne. London: George Bell & Sons.

1908. p. 289.

[Illustration: ANONYMOUS FLORENTINE, XV CENTURY. ASSUMPTION OF THE

VIRGIN (After Botticelli)

Size of the original engraving, 32⅝ × 22¼ inches

In the Museum of Fine Arts, Boston]

[Illustration: ANONYMOUS FLORENTINE, XV CENTURY. TRIUMPH OF LOVE. FROM

THE TRIUMPHS OF PETRARCH.

Size of the original engraving, 10⅜ × 6¾ inches

In the Museum of Fine Arts, Boston]

If the _Assumption of the Virgin_ is the noblest print in the Broad

Manner, the _Triumphs of Petrarch_--a set of six prints--may be said

to possess the greatest charm, not less by its subject than by its

treatment. Petrarch first saw Laura on April 6, 1327, in the Church

of Santa Clara at Avignon, and “in the same city, on the same 6th day

of the same month of April, in the year 1348, the bright light of her

life was taken away from the light of this earth.” The poet’s aim in

composing these _Trionfi_ is the same which he proposed to himself in

the _Canzoniere_: namely, “to return in thought, from time to time,

now to the beginning, now to the progress, and now to the end of his

passion, taking by the way frequent opportunities of rendering praise

and honor to the single and exalted object of his love. To reach this

aim he devised a description of man in his various conditions of life,

wherein he might naturally find occasion to speak of himself and of his

Laura.

“Man in his first stage of youth is the slave of appetites, which may

all be included under the generic name of LOVE, or Self-Love. But as

he gains understanding, he sees the impropriety of such a condition,

so that he strives advisedly against those appetites and overcomes them

by means of CHASTITY, that is, by denying himself the opportunity of

satisfying them. Amid these struggles and victories DEATH overtakes him

and makes victors and vanquished equal by taking them all out of the

world. Nevertheless, it has no power to destroy the memory of a man,

who by illustrious and honorable deeds seeks to survive his own death.

Such a man truly lives through a long course of ages by means of his

FAME. But TIME at length obliterates all memory of him, and he finds,

in the last resort, that his only sure hope of living forever is by joy

in God and by partaking with God in his blessed ETERNITY.

“Thus LOVE triumphs over man, CHASTITY over

LOVE, and DEATH over both alike; FAME

triumphs over DEATH, TIME over FAME, and

ETERNITY over TIME.”[5]

[5] Le Rime di Francesco Petrarca con l’interpretazione di Giacomo

Leopardi ... e gli argomenti di A. Marsand. Florence. 1839. p.

866. Translation in, Petrarch: His Life and Times. By H. C.

Hollway-Calthrop. London. 1907. pp. 41-42.

With the exception of the first plate, _The Triumph of Love_, none

of these engravings illustrates, in any strict sense of the word,

the text of Petrarch’s poem. It is the spirit which the engraver has

interpreted. Who may have been the designer we know not, but they

show certain affinities to the work of Pesellino and Baldovinetti.

[Illustration: ANONYMOUS FLORENTINE, XV CENTURY. TRIUMPH OF CHASTITY.

FROM THE TRIUMPHS OF PETRARCH

Size of the original engraving, 10 × 6⅜ inches

In the Fogg Art Museum, Harvard University]

[Illustration: ANONYMOUS FLORENTINE, XV CENTURY. LIBYAN SIBYL

Size of the original engraving, 7 × 4¼ inches

In the British Museum]

In the first plate, Cupid, the blind archer, with flame-tipped arrow,

is poised upon a ball rising from a flaming vase, the base of which,

in its turn, rests upon flame. Jupiter(?), chained, is seated in the

front of the car, while Samson, bearing a column, walks upon the

further side. Four prancing steeds draw the car; behind, Love’s victims

follow in endless procession. In the second plate, _Chastity_ stands

upon an urn; in front of her kneels Cupid, still blindfolded, with his

broken arrow beside him. Two unicorns, symbols of chastity, draw the

car, while upon the banner borne by the maiden at the extreme right

there appears the symbolic ermine. Then follow in order the Triumphs of

_Death_, of _Fame_, of _Time_, and of _Eternity_.

This series of illustrations reappears, somewhat modified and

simplified, in the form of woodcuts, in the editions of the _Trionfi_

published in Venice in 1488, 1490, 1492, and in Florence in 1499.

We have already referred to the _Evangelists and Apostles_ engraved by

the German, Master E. S. of 1466. It is from him that the anonymous

Florentine engraver borrowed his figures, in many cases leaving

the form of the drapery unchanged but enriching it with elaborate

designs in the manner of Finiguerra. The Prophet _Ezekiel_ is thus

compounded of _St. John_ and _St. Peter_, while _Amos_ is copied in

reverse from _St. Paul_. The seated figure of _Daniel_, in its turn,

is derived from Martin Schongauer’s engraving, _Christ Before Pilate_,

but the throne upon which he is seated is strongly reminiscent of the

Picture-Chronicle, and likewise recalls Botticelli’s early painting of

_Fortitude_. The _Tiburtine Sibyl_ is derived from _St. Matthew_, who,

in changing his position, has likewise changed his sex. The precedent

thus established has been followed by _St. John_, transformed into the

_Libyan Sibyl_ in the Fine Manner, with the addition of a flying veil,

to the right, copied from the _Woman with the Escutcheon_, also by the

Master E. S. In the Broad Manner print the figure of this Sibyl gains

in dignity by the elimination of much superfluous ornament upon her

outer garment, and from the fact that she now sits in a more upright

posture, the Fine Manner print still suggesting the crouching attitude

of its Northern prototype. It is to the influence, if not to the hand,

of Botticelli that such improvement is most likely due.

The twenty-four _Prophets_ and the twelve _Sibyls_, engraved both

in the Fine and in the Broad Manner of the Finiguerra School, are

individually and collectively among the most delightful productions

of Italian art. It was doubtless as illustrations of mystery plays or

pageants in Florence that this series of engravings was designed,

and we are able to reconstruct from the _Triumphs of Petrarch_, and

from these prints, a Florentine street pageant at its loveliest.

[Illustration: ANONYMOUS NORTH ITALIAN, XV CENTURY. THE GENTLEMAN.

FROM THE TAROCCHI PRINTS

(E Series)

Size of the original engraving, 7⅛ × 4 inches

In the Museum of Fine Arts, Boston]

[Illustration: ANONYMOUS NORTH ITALIAN, XV CENTURY. CLIO. FROM THE

TAROCCHI PRINTS (S Series)

Size of the original engraving, 7⅛ × 4 inches

In the Museum of Fine Arts, Boston]

However great their beauty and however strong the fascination which

they exert, they have a rival in the series of fifty instructive

prints, which, for many years, were miscalled the _Tarocchi Cards of

Mantegna_. Tarocchi cards they are not, and of Mantegna’s influence,

direct or indirect, there would seem to be no trace whatsoever. They

are of North Italian origin and are the work, in all probability, of

some anonymous Venetian engraver, working from Venetian or Ferrarese

originals, about 1465--contemporary, therefore, with the Florentine

engravings of the _Prophets and Sibyls_. Forming, apparently, a

pictorial cyclopædia of the mediæval universe, with its systematic

classification of the various powers of Heaven and Earth, they divide

themselves into five groups of ten cards each. First we have the ranks

and conditions of men from Beggar to Pope; next Apollo and the nine

Muses; then the Liberal Arts, with the addition of Poetry, Philosophy,

and Theology, in order to make up the ten; next the Seven Virtues,

the set being brought up to the required number by the addition of

_Chronico_, the genius of Time, _Cosmico_, the genius of the Universe,

and _Iliaco_, the genius of the Sun. The fifth group is based on

the Seven Planets, together with the Sphere of the Fixed Stars and

the Primum Mobile, which imparts its own revolving motion to all the

spheres within it; and enfolding all the Empyrean Sphere, the abode of

Heavenly Wisdom.

Much wisdom and many words have been expended upon the still unsolved

riddle as to which of the two sets, known respectively as the E

series and the S series (from the letters which appear in the lower

left-hand corners of the ten cards of the _Sorts and Conditions of

Men_) may claim priority of date. Both series are in the Fine Manner,

the outlines clearly defined, the shadings and modelling indicated

with delicate burin strokes, crossed and re-crossed so as to give a

tonal effect. These delicate strokes soon wore out in printing, and the

structural lines of the figures then emerge in all their beauty. It may

seem absurd that one should admire impressions from plates obviously

worn, but the critic would do well to suspend his condemnation, since

the Tarocchi Prints present many and manifold forms of beauty--in

the early impressions a delicate and bloom-like quality; in certain

somewhat later proofs, a charm of line which recalls the art of the Far

East.

[Illustration: ANONYMOUS NORTH ITALIAN, XV CENTURY. THE SUN. FROM THE

TAROCCHI PRINTS (E Series)

Size of the original engraving, 7⅛ × 4 inches

In the Museum of Fine Arts, Boston]

[Illustration: ANONYMOUS NORTH ITALIAN, XV CENTURY. ANGEL OF THE

EIGHTH SPHERE. FROM THE TAROCCHI PRINTS

(E Series)

Size of the original engraving, 7⅛ × 4 inches

In the Museum of Fine Arts, Boston]

_The Gentleman_ is the fifth in order in the first group of the _Sorts

and Conditions of Men_, and is from the so-called E series (claimed

by Sir Sidney Colvin and Mr. Arthur M. Hind, of the British Museum, to

be the earlier of the two sets). The sequence runs: (1) The Beggar, (2)

The Servant, (3) The Artisan, (4) The Merchant, (5) The Gentleman, (6)

The Knight, (7) The Doge, (8) The King, (9) The Emperor, (10) The Pope.

_Clio_ is the ninth of the Muses and is from the S series (placed first

in point of time, by Kristeller, and about ten years later than the E

series, by the British Museum authorities).

_The Sun_ naturally finds his place in the group of _Planets_ and

_Spheres_. There is a delightful and childish touch in the way in which

_Phæton_ is pictured as a little boy falling headlong into the river

Po, which conveniently flows immediately beneath him. To this group

belongs likewise the _Angel of the Eighth Sphere_, the Sphere of the

Fixed Stars, one of the loveliest prints in the entire set, both in

arrangement and in execution.

Nothing could be in greater contrast to the gracefulness of such a

print as the above than the _Battle of Naked Men_ by ANTONIO

POLLAIUOLO, “the stupendous Florentine”--if one may borrow Dante’s

title; but, for the moment, we will hold Pollaiuolo and his one

engraving in reserve while we glance at the work of CHRISTOFANO

ROBETTA, who, born in Florence in 1462, was consequently the

junior of Pollaiuolo by thirty years. As an engraver, Robetta is

inferior to the anonymous master to whom we owe the E series of the

Tarocchi prints. His style is somewhat dry, and the individual lines

are lacking in beauty; but his plates have that indefinable and

indescribable fascination and charm which is the peculiar possession

of Italian engraving and of the Florentine masters in particular. The

shaping influences which determined his choice and treatment of subject

are Botticelli, and, in a much larger measure, Filippino Lippi, though

only in a few cases can he be shown to have worked directly from that

painter’s designs. The _Adoration of the Magi_ is obviously inspired

by Filippino Lippi’s painting in the Uffizi, though whether Robetta

actually worked from the painting itself, or, as seems more probable,

translated one of Filippino’s drawings, is an interesting question. The

fact that the engraving is in reverse of the painting proves nothing;

but there are so many points of difference between them--notably the

introduction of the charming group of three angels above the Virgin and

Child--that one can hardly think Robetta would have needlessly made so

many and important modifications of the painting itself, if a drawing

had been available. It is interesting, though of minor importance, that

the hat of the King to the right, which lies on the ground, is copied

in reverse from Schongauer’s _Adoration_, and that the _Allegory

of the Power of Love_, one of Robetta’s most charming subjects, is

engraved upon the reverse side of the plate of the _Adoration of

the Magi_, the copper-plate itself being now in the Print Room of

the British Museum. Whether the _Allegory of Abundance_ is entirely

Robetta’s, or whether the design was suggested by another master’s

painting or drawing, can be only a matter of conjecture. It shows,

however, so many of the characteristics which we associate with his

work that we may give him the benefit of the doubt and consider him as

its “onlie begetter.”

[Illustration: CRISTOFANO ROBETTA. ADORATION OF THE MAGI

Size of the original engraving, 11⅝ × 11 inches

In the Museum of Fine Arts, Boston]

[Illustration: ANTONIO POLLAIUOLO. BATTLE OF NAKED MEN

Size of the original engraving, 15¾ × 23½ inches

In the Museum of Fine Arts, Boston]

_Hercules and the Hydra_ and _Hercules and Antæus_ show so markedly the

influence of Pollaiuolo that we may conclude them to have been taken

from the two small panels in the Uffizi; though, in the case of the

first named, Pollaiuolo’s original sketch, now in the British Museum,

may also have served Robetta.

Whether POLLAIUOLO based his technical method upon that of

Mantegna and his School, or whether Mantegna’s own engravings were

inspired by his Florentine contemporary, is an interesting, but thus

far unanswered, question. Pollaiuolo’s one print, the _Battle of Naked

Men_, is engraved in the Broad Manner, somewhat modified by the use

of a light stroke laid at an acute angle between the parallels. The

outlines of the figures are strongly incised; while the treatment of

the background lends color to the supposition that, in his youth,

Pollaiuolo engraved in niello, as well as furnished designs to be

executed by Finiguerra and his School. In this masterpiece the artist

has summed up his knowledge of the human form, and has expressed, in

a more convincing and vigorous measure than has any other engraver in

the history of the art, the strain and stress of violent motion and the

fury of combat.

“What is it,” asks Bernhard Berenson, “that makes us return to this

sheet with ever-renewed, ever-increased pleasure? Surely it is not the

hideous faces of most of the figures and their scarcely less hideous

bodies. Nor is it the pattern as decorative design, which is of great

beauty indeed, but not at all in proportion to the spell exerted upon

us. Least of all is it--for most of us--an interest in the technique

or history of engraving. No, the pleasure we take in these savagely

battling forms arises from their power to directly communicate life,

to immensely heighten our sense of vitality. Look at the combatant

prostrate on the ground and his assailant, bending over, each intent

on stabbing the other. See how the prostrate man plants his foot on

the thigh of his enemy and note the tremendous energy he exerts to

keep off the foe, who, turning as upon a pivot, with his grip on the

other’s head, exerts no less force to keep the advantage gained. The

significance of all these muscular strains and pressures is so rendered

that we cannot help realizing them; we imagine ourselves imitating all

the movements and exerting the force required for them--and all without

the least effort on our side. If all this without moving a muscle, what

should we feel if we too had exerted ourselves? And thus while under

the spell of this illusion--this hyperæsthesia not bought with drugs

and not paid for with cheques drawn on our vitality--we feel as if the

elixir of life, not our own sluggish blood, were coursing through our

veins.”[6]

[6] Florentine Painters of the Renaissance. By Bernhard Berenson. New

York: Putnam’s Sons. 1899. pp. 54-55.

Pollaiuolo is the one great original engraver Florence produced, and

with him we bring to a close our all too brief study of Florentine

engraving.

Engravers and Etchers Six Lectures Delivered on the Scammon Foundation at the Art Institute of Chicago, March 1916 · 第 42 / 89 题