Proof of the Minor

If someone can dispose of something at pleasure in his own name, then

that someone has a right to that thing. But if someone can perform

only in the name of another, he transacts this business such that the

other is thereby bound, as if the business were transacted by

himself. (Quod quis facit per alium, ipse fecisse putandus

set). Therefore my right to the transacting of a business in the name

of another is a personal positive right, to necessitate the author of

the business to guarantee something, namely, to answer for everything

which he has done through me, or to which he obliges himself through

me. The publishing of the work is now a speech to the public (by

printing) in the name of the author, and is consequently a business in

the name of another. Therefore the right to it is a right of the

editor's against a person: not merely to defend himself in the use of

his property at pleasure against him; but to necessitate him to

acknowledge and to answer for as his own a certain business, which the

editor transacts in his name; consequently this is a personal positive

right.

The copy, according to which the editor prints, is a work of the

author's and belongs totally to the editor after he has purchased it,

either in the manuscript form or the printed form, to do with it

everything the editor pleases, where said doings can be done in the

editor's own name; for that is a requisite of the complete right in a

thing, i.e. ownership. But the use, which the editor cannot make of it

except only in the name of another (namely the author's), is a

business (opera) that this other transacts through the owner of the

copy, where in addition to the ownership of the copy, a particular

contract is still requisite for other rights to be provided to the

owner of the copy.

Now, the publication of a book is a business which can only be

transacted in the name of another (namely the author, whom the editor

presents as speaking to the public through him); therefore the rights

of transacting the business of publishing the book is separate from

the rights that are associated with the ownership of a copy of the

book. The right to publish the book can legally be acquired only by a

particular contract with the author. Who publishes without such a

contract with the author (or, if the author has already granted this

right to another, i.e. to an authorized editor, without a contract

with that authorized editor) is the counterfeiter, who then damages

the authorized editor, and must make amends to him for all damages.

Of the Injustice of Counterfeiting Books From: Essays and Treaties on Moral, Political and various Philosophical Subjects · 第 7 / 8 题