SHAKESPEARE EMENDATIONS.

(Vol. vi., p. 312.)

I cannot receive MR. CORNISH'S substitution (p. 312.) of "chommer" for

_clamour_ in the _Winter's Tale_, Act IV. Sc. 3. In my opinion, _clamour_

is nearly or altogether the right word, but wrongly spelt. We have a verb

_to clam_, which, as connected with _clammy_, we use for sticking with

glutinous matter; but which originally must, like the kindred German

_klemmen_, have signified _to press_, _to squeeze_; for the kind of wooden

vice used by harness-makers is, at least in some places, called a _clams_.

I therefore suppose the clown to have said _clam_, or perhaps _clammer_

(_i.e._ hold) _your tongues._

Highly plausible as is MR. C.'S other emendation in the same place of _2

Henry IV._, Act III. Sc. 1., I cannot receive it either. In Shakspeare the

word _clown_ is almost always nearly equivalent to the Spanish _gracioso_,

and denotes humour; and surely we cannot suppose it to be used of the

ship-boy. Besides, a verb is wanted, as the causal particle _for_ is as

usual to be understood before "Uneasy lies," &c. I see no objection

whatever to the common reading, though _possibly_ the poet wrote:

"Then, happy _boy_, lie down."

There never, in my opinion, was a happier emendation than that of _guidon_

for _guard_; _On_, in _Henry V._, Act IV. Sc. 2.; and its being made by two

persons independently, gives it--as MR. COLLIER justly observes of

_palpable_ for _capable_ in _As You Like It_--additional weight. We are to

recollect that a Frenchman is the speaker. I find _guidon_ used for banner

in the following lines of Clément Marot (Elégie III.):

"De Fermeté le grand _guidon_ suivrons,"

and--

"Cestuy _guidon_ et triomphante enseigne,

Nous devons suyvre: Amour le nous enseigne."

The change of _a sea of troubles_ to _assay of troubles_ in _Hamlet_ is

very plausible, and ought perhaps to be received. So also is SIR F.

MADDEN'S of _face_ for _case_ (which last is downright nonsense) in

_Twelfth Night_, Act V. Sc. 1. But I would just hint that as all the rest

of the Duke's speech is in rhyme, it is not impossible that the poet may

have written--

"O thou dissembling cub! what wilt thou be

When time hath sow'd a grizzle upon thee?"

{45}

Allow me now to put a question to the critics. In the two concluding lines

of the _Merchant of Venice_ (the speaker, observe, is the jesting

Gratiano):

"Well, while I live, I'll fear no other thing

So sore, as keeping safe Nerissa's ring."

May there not be a covert allusion to the story first told by Poggio in his

_Facetiæ_, then by Ariosto, then by Rabelais, then by La Fontaine, and,

finally, by Prior, in his _Hans Carvel_? Rabelais was greatly read at the

time.

Notes and Queries, Number 167, January 8, 1853 A Medium of Inter-communication for Literary Men, Artists, Antiquaries, Genealogists, etc. · 第 76 / 148 题