A DIALOGUE

_Lucian. A Friend_

_Fr_. What a haughty and dignified Lucian returns to us from his

journey! He will not vouchsafe us a glance; he stands aloof, and will

hold no further communion with us. Altogether a supercilious Lucian!

The change is sudden. Might one inquire the cause of this altered

demeanour?

_Luc_. 'Tis the work of Fortune.

_Fr_. Of Fortune!

_Luc_. As an incidental result of my journey, you see in me a happy

man; 'thrice-blest,' as the tragedians have it.

_Fr_. Dear me. What, in this short time?

_Luc_. Even so.

_Fr_. But what does it all mean? What is the secret of your elation? I

decline to rejoice with you in this abridged fashion; I must have

details. Tell me all about it.

_Luc_. What should you think, if I told you that I had exchanged

servitude for freedom; poverty for true wealth; folly and presumption

for good sense?

_Fr_. Extraordinary! But I am not quite clear of your meaning yet.

_Luc_. Why, I went off to Rome to see an oculist—my eyes had been

getting worse—

_Fr_. Yes, I know about that. I have been hoping that you would light

on a good man.

_Luc_. Well, I got up early one morning with the intention of paying a

long-deferred visit to Nigrinus, the Platonic philosopher. On reaching

his house, I knocked, and was duly announced and admitted to his

presence. I found him with a book in his hand, surrounded by various

statues of the ancient philosophers. Before him lay a tablet, with

geometrical figures described on it, and a globe of reeds, designed

apparently to represent the universe. He greeted me cordially, and

asked after my welfare. I satisfied his inquiries, and demanded, in my

turn, how he did, and whether he had decided on another trip to Greece.

Once on that subject, he gave free expression to his sentiments; and, I

assure you, 'twas a veritable feast of ambrosia to me. The spells of

the Sirens (if ever there were Sirens), of the Pindaric 'Charmers,' of

the Homeric lotus, are things to be forgotten, after his truly divine

eloquence. Led on by his theme, he spoke the praises of philosophy, and

of the freedom which philosophy confers; and expressed his contempt for

the vulgar error which sets a value upon wealth and renown and dominion

and power, upon gold and purple, and all that dazzles the eyes of the

world,—and once attracted my own! I listened with rapt attention, and

with a swelling heart. At the time, I knew not what had come over me;

my feelings were indescribable. My dearest idols, riches and renown,

lay shattered; one moment I was ready to shed bitter tears over the

disillusionment, the next, I could have laughed for scorn of these very

things, and was exulting in my escape from the murky atmosphere of my

past life into the brightness of the upper air. The result was curious:

I forgot all about my ophthalmic troubles, in the gradual improvement

of my spiritual vision; for till that day I had grovelled in spiritual

blindness. Little by little I came into the condition with which you

were twitting me just now. Nigrinus's words have raised in me a joyous

exaltation of spirit which precludes every meaner thought. Philosophy

seems to have produced the same effect on me as wine is said to have

produced on the Indians the first time they drank it. The mere taste of

such potent liquor threw them into a state of absolute frenzy, the

intoxicating power of the wine being doubled in men so warm-blooded by

nature. This is my case. I go about like one possessed; I am drunk with

the words of wisdom.

_Fr_. This is not drunkenness, but sobriety and temperance. But I

should like to hear what Nigrinus actually said, if that may be. It is

only right that you should take that trouble for me; I am your friend,

and share your interests.

_Luc_. Enough! You urge a willing steed. I was about to bespeak your

attention. You must be my witness to the world, that there is reason in

my madness. Indeed, apart from this, the work of recollection is a

pleasure, and has become a constant practice with me; twice, thrice in

a day I repeat over his words, though there is none to hear. A lover,

in the absence of his mistress, remembers some word, some act of hers,

dwells on it, and beguiles hours of sickness with her feigned presence.

Sometimes he thinks he is face to face with her; words, heard long

since, come again from her lips; he rejoices; his soul cleaves to the

memory of the past, and has no time for present vexations. It is so

with me. Philosophy is far away, but I have heard a philosopher's

words. I piece them together, and revolve them in my heart, and am

comforted. Nigrinus is the beacon-fire on which, far out in mid-ocean,

in the darkness of night, I fix my gaze; I fancy him present with me in

all my doings; I hear ever the same words. At times, in moments of

concentration, I see his very face, his voice rings in my ears. Of him

it may truly be said, as of Pericles,

In every heart he left his sting.

_Fr_. Stay, gentle enthusiast. Take a good breath, and start again; I

am waiting to hear what Nigrinus said. You beat about the bush in a

manner truly exasperating.

_Luc_. True, I must make a start, as you say. And yet… Tell me, did you

never see a tragedy (nay, the comedies fare no better) murdered by bad

acting, and the culprits finally hissed off the stage for their pains?

As often as not the play is a perfectly good one, and has scored a

success.

_Fr_. I know the sort of thing; and what about it?

_Luc_. I am afraid that before I have done you will find that I make as

sad work of it as they do,—jumbling things together pell-mell, spoiling

the whole point sometimes by inadequate expression; and you will end by

damning the play instead of the actor. I could put up with my own share

of the disgrace; but it would vex me indeed, that my subject should be

involved in my downfall; I cannot have _it_ discredited for my

shortcomings. Remember, then: whatever the imperfections in my speech,

the author is not to be called to account; he sits far aloof from the

stage, and knows nothing of what is going forward. The memory of the

actor is all that you are invited to criticize; I am neither more nor

less than the 'Messenger' in a tragedy. At each flaw in the argument,

be this your first thought, that the author probably said something

quite different, and much more to the point;—and then you may hiss me

off if you will.

_Fr_. Bless me; here is quite a professional exordium! You are about to

add, I think, that 'your consultation with your client has been but

brief'; that you 'come into court imperfectly instructed'; that 'it

were to be desired that your client were here to plead his own cause;

as it is, you are reduced to such a meagre and inadequate statement of

the case, as memory will supply.' Am I right? Well then, spare yourself

the trouble, as far as I am concerned. Imagine all these preliminaries

settled. I stand prepared to applaud: but if you keep me waiting, I

shall harbour resentment all through the case, and hiss you

accordingly.

_Luc_. I should, indeed, have been glad to avail myself of the

arguments you mention, and of others too. I might have said, that mine

would be no set speech, no orderly statement such as that I heard; that

is wholly beyond me. Nor can I speak in the person of Nigrinus. There

again I should be like a bad actor, taking the part of Agamemnon, or

Creon, or Heracles' self; he is arrayed in cloth of gold, and looks

very formidable, and his mouth opens tremendously wide; and what comes

out of it? A little, shrill, womanish pipe of a voice that would

disgrace Polyxena or Hecuba! I for my part have no intention of

exposing myself in a mask several sizes too large for me, or of wearing

a robe to which I cannot do credit. Rather than play the hero's part,

and involve him in my discomfiture, I will speak in my own person.

_Fr_. Will the man never have done with his masks and his stages?

_Luc_. Nay, that is all. And now to my subject. Nigrinus's first words

were in praise of Greece, and in particular of the Athenians. They are

brought up, he said, to poverty and to philosophy. The endeavours,

whether of foreigners or of their own countrymen, to introduce luxury

into their midst, find no favour with them. When a man comes among them

with this view, they quietly set about to correct his tendency, and by

gentle degrees to bring him to a better course of life. He mentioned

the case of a wealthy man who arrived at Athens in all the vulgar pomp

of retinue and gold and gorgeous raiment, expecting that every eye

would be turned upon him in envy of his lot; instead of which, they

heartily pitied the poor worm, and proceeded to take his education in

hand. Not an ill-natured word, not an attempt at direct interference:

it was a free city; he was at liberty to live in it as he thought fit.

But when he made a public nuisance of himself in the baths or

gymnasiums, crowding in with his attendants, and taking up all the

room, someone would whisper, in a sly aside, as if the words were not

meant to reach his ears: 'He is afraid he will never come out from here

alive; yet all is peace; there is no need of such an army.' The remark

would be overheard, and would have its educational effect. They soon

eased him of his embroidery and purple, by playful allusions to flower

and colour. 'Spring is early.'—'How did that peacock get here?'—'His

mother must have lent him that shawl,'—and so on. The same with the

rest, his rings, his elaborate coiffure, and his table excesses. Little

by little he came to his senses, and left Athens very much the better

for the public education he had received.

Nor do they scruple to confess their poverty. He mentioned a sentence

which he heard pronounced unanimously by the assembled people at the

Panathenaic festival. A citizen had been arrested and brought before

the Steward for making his appearance in coloured clothes. The

onlookers felt for him, and took his part; and when the herald declared

that he had violated the law by attending the festival in that attire,

they all exclaimed with one voice, as if they had been in consultation,

'that he must be pardoned for wearing those clothes, as he had no

others.'

He further commended the Athenian liberty, and unpretentious style of

living; the peace and learned leisure which they so abundantly enjoy.

To dwell among such men, he declared, is to dwell with philosophy; a

single-hearted man, who has been taught to despise wealth, may here

preserve a pure morality; no life could be more in harmony with the

determined pursuit of all that is truly beautiful. But the man over

whom gold has cast its spell, who is in love with riches, and measures

happiness by purple raiment and dominion, who, living his life among

flatterers and slaves, knows not the sweets of freedom, the blessings

of candour, the beauty of truth; he who has given up his soul to

Pleasure, and will serve no other mistress, whose heart is set on

gluttony and wine and women, on whose tongue are deceit and hypocrisy;

he again whose ears must be tickled with lascivious songs, and the

voluptuous notes of flute and lyre;—let all such (he cried) dwell here

in Rome; the life will suit them. Our streets and market-places are

filled with the things they love best. They may take in pleasure

through every aperture, through eye and ear, nostril and palate; nor

are the claims of Aphrodite forgotten. The turbid stream surges

everlastingly through our streets; avarice, perjury, adultery,—all

tastes are represented. Under that rush of waters, modesty, virtue,

uprightness, are torn from the soul; and in their stead grows the tree

of perpetual thirst, whose flowers are many strange desires.

Such was Rome; such were the blessings she taught men to enjoy. 'As for

me,' he continued, 'on returning from my first voyage to Greece, I

stopped short a little way from the city, and called myself to account,

in the words of Homer, for my return.

Ah, wretch! and leav'st thou then the light of day—the joyous freedom

of Greece,

And wouldst behold—

the turmoil of Rome? slander and insolence and gluttony, flatterers and

false friends, legacy-hunters and murderers? And what wilt thou do

here? thou canst not endure these things, neither canst thou escape

them! Thus reasoning, I withdrew myself out of range, as Zeus did

Hector,

Far from the scene of slaughter, blood and strife,

and resolved henceforth to keep my house. I lead the life you see—a

spiritless, womanish life, most men would account it—holding converse

with Philosophy, with Plato, with Truth. From my high seat in this vast

theatre, I look down on the scene beneath me; a scene calculated to

afford much entertainment; calculated also to try a man's resolution to

the utmost. For, to give evil its due, believe me, there is no better

school for virtue, no truer test of moral strength, than life in this

same city of Rome. It is no easy thing, to withstand so many

temptations, so many allurements and distractions of sight and sound.

There is no help for it: like Odysseus, we must sail past them all; and

there must be no binding of hands, no stopping of our ears with wax;

that would be but sorry courage: our ears must hear, our hands must be

free,—and our contempt must be genuine. Well may that man conceive an

admiration of philosophy, who is a spectator of so much folly; well may

he despise the gifts of Fortune, who views this stage, and its

multitudinous actors. The slave grows to be master, the rich man is

poor, the pauper becomes a prince, a king; and one is His Majesty's

friend, and another is his enemy, and a third he banishes. And here is

the strangest thing of all: the affairs of mankind are confessedly the

playthings of Fortune, they have no pretence to security; yet, with

instances of this daily before their eyes, men will reach after wealth

and power;—not one of them but carries his load of hopes unrealized.

'But I said that there was entertainment also to be derived from the

scene; and I will maintain it. Our rich men are an entertainment in

themselves, with their purple and their rings always in evidence, and

their thousand vulgarities. The latest development is the _salutation

by proxy_; [Footnote: The _spoken_ salutation being performed by a

servant.] they favour us with a glance, and that must be happiness

enough. By the more ambitious spirits, an obeisance is expected; this

is not performed at a distance, after the Persian fashion—you go right

up, and make a profound bow, testifying with the angle of your body to

the self-abasement of your soul; you then kiss his hand or breast—and

happy and enviable is he who may do so much! And there stands the great

man, protracting the illusion as long as may be. (I heartily acquiesce,

by the way, in the churlish sentence which excludes us from a nearer

acquaintance with their _lips_.)

'But if these men are amusing, their courtiers and flatterers are

doubly so. They rise in the small hours of the night, to go their round

of the city, to have doors slammed in their faces by slaves, to swallow

as best they may the compliments of "Dog," "Toadeater," and the like.

And the guerdon of their painful circumambulations? A vulgarly

magnificent dinner, the source of many woes! They eat too much, they

drink more than they want, they talk more than they should; and then

they go away, angry and disappointed, grumbling at their fare, and

protesting against the scant courtesy shown them by their insolent

patron. You may see them vomiting in every alley, squabbling at every

brothel. The daylight most of them spend in bed, furnishing employment

for the doctors. Most of them, I say; for with some it has come to

this, that they actually have no time to be ill. My own opinion is

that, of the two parties, the toadies are more to blame, and have only

themselves to thank for their patron's insolence. What can they expect

him to think, after their commendations of his wealth, their panegyrics

on money, their early attendance at his doors, their servile

salutations? If by common consent they would abstain, were it only for

a few days, from this voluntary servitude, the tables must surely be

turned, and the rich come to the doors of the paupers, imploring them

not to leave such blessedness as theirs without a witness, their fine

houses and elegant furniture lying idle for want of some one to use

them. Not wealth, but the envy that waits on wealth, is the object of

their desire. The truth is, gold and ivory and noble mansions are of

little avail to their owner, if there is no one to admire them. If we

would break the power of the rich, and bring down their pretensions, we

must raise up within their borders a stronghold of Indifference. As it

is, their vanity is fostered by the court that is paid to them. In

ordinary men, who have no pretence to education, this conduct, no

doubt, is less to be blamed. But that men who call themselves

philosophers should actually outdo the rest in degradation,—this,

indeed, is the climax. Imagine my feelings, when I see a brother

philosopher, an old man, perhaps, mingling in the herd of sycophants;

dancing attendance on some great man; adapting himself to the

conversational level of a possible host! One thing, indeed, serves to

distinguish him from his company, and to accentuate his disgrace;—he

wears the garb of philosophy. It is much to be regretted that actors of

uniform excellence in other respects will not dress conformably to

their part. For in the achievements of the table, what toadeater

besides can be compared with them? There is an artlessness in their

manner of stuffing themselves, a frankness in their tippling, which

defy competition; they sponge with more spirit than other men, and sit

on with greater persistency. It is not an uncommon thing for the more

courtly sages to oblige the company with a song.'

All this he treated as a jest. But he had much to say on the subject of

those paid philosophers, who hawk about virtue like any other

marketable commodity. 'Hucksters' and 'petty traders' were his words

for them. A man who proposes to teach the contempt of wealth, should

begin (he maintained) by showing a soul above fees. And certainly he

has always acted on this principle himself. He is not content with

giving his services gratis to all comers, but lends a helping hand to

all who are in difficulties, and shows an absolute disregard for

riches. So far is he from grasping at other men's goods, that he could

anticipate without concern the deterioration of his own property. He

possessed an estate at no great distance from the city, on which for

many years he had never even set foot. Nay, he disclaimed all right of

property in it; meaning, I suppose, that we have no natural claim to

such things; law, and the rights of inheritance, give us the use of

them for an indefinite period, and for that time we are styled

'owners'; presently our term lapses, and another succeeds to the

enjoyment of a name.

There are other points in which he sets an admirable example to the

serious followers of philosophy: his frugal life, his systematic habits

of bodily exercise, his modest bearing, his simplicity of dress, but

above all, gentle manners and a constant mind. He urges his followers

not to postpone the pursuit of good, as so many do, who allow

themselves a period of grace till the next great festival, after which

they propose to eschew deceit and lead a righteous life; there must be

no shilly-shallying, when virtue is the goal for which we start. On the

other hand, there are philosophers whose idea of inculcating virtue in

their youthful disciples is to subject them to various tests of

physical endurance; whose favourite prescription is the strait

waistcoat, varied with flagellations, or the enlightened process of

scarification. Of these Nigrinus evidently had no opinion. According to

him, our first care should be to inure the _soul_ to pain and hardship;

he who aspired to educate men aright must reckon with soul as well as

body, with the age of his pupils, and with their previous training; he

would then escape the palpable blunder of overtasking them. Many a one

(he affirmed) had succumbed under the unreasonable strain put upon him;

and I met with an instance myself, of a man who had tasted the

hardships of those schools, but no sooner heard the words of true

wisdom, than he fled incontinently to Nigrinus, and was manifestly the

better for the change.

Leaving the philosophers to themselves, he reverted to more general

subjects: the din and bustle of the city, the theatres, the

race-course, the statues of charioteers, the nomenclature of horses,

the horse-talk in every side-street. The rage for horses has become a

positive epidemic; many persons are infected with it whom one would

have credited with more sense.

Then the scene changed to the pomp and circumstance attendant upon

funerals and testamentary dispositions. 'Only once in his life' (he

observed) 'does your thoroughbred Roman say what he means; and then,'

meaning, in his will, 'it comes too late for him to enjoy the credit of

it.' I could not help laughing when he told me how they thought it

necessary to carry their follies with them to the grave, and to leave

the record of their inanity behind them in black and white; some

stipulating that their clothes or other treasures should be burnt with

them, others that their graves should be watched by particular

servants, or their monuments crowned with flowers;—sapient end to a

life of sapience! 'Of their doings in this world,' said he, 'you may

form some idea from their injunctions with reference to the next. These

are they who will pay a long price for an entree; whose floors are

sprinkled with wine and saffron and spices; who in midwinter smother

themselves in roses, ay, for roses are scarce, and out of season, and

altogether desirable; but let a thing come in its due course, and oh,

'tis vile, 'tis contemptible. These are they whose drink is of costly

essences.' He had no mercy on them here. 'Very bunglers in sensuality,

who know not her laws, and confound her ordinances, flinging down their

souls to be trampled beneath the heels of luxury! As the play has it,

Door or window, all is one to them. Such pleasures are rank solecism.'

One observation of his in the same spirit fairly caps the famous

censure of Momus. Momus found fault with the divine artificer for not

putting his bull's horns in front of the eyes. Similarly, Nigrinus

complained that when these men crown themselves in their banquets, they

put the garlands in the wrong place; if they are so fond of the smell

of violets and roses, they should tie on their garlands as close as may

be under their nostrils; they could then snuff up the smell to their

hearts' content.

Proceeding to the gentlemen who make such a serious work of their

dinner, he was exceedingly merry over their painful elaborations of

sauce and seasoning. 'Here again,' he cried, 'these men are sore put to

it, to procure the most fleeting of enjoyments. Grant them four inches

of palate apiece—'tis the utmost we can allow any man—and I will prove

to you that they have four inches of gratification for their trouble.

Thus: there is no satisfaction to be got out of the costliest viands

before consumption; and after it a full stomach is none the better for

the price it has cost to fill it. _Ergo_, the money is paid for the

pleasure snatched _in transitu_. But what are we to expect? These men

are too grossly ignorant to discern those truer pleasures with which

Philosophy rewards our resolute endeavours.'

The Baths proved a fertile topic, what with the insolence of the

masters and the jostlings of their men;—'they will not stand without

the support of a slave; it is much that they retain enough vitality to

get away on their own legs at all.' One practice which obtains in the

streets and Baths of Rome seemed to arouse his particular resentment.

Slaves have to walk on ahead of their masters, and call out to them to

'look to their feet,' whenever there is a hole or a lump in their way;

it has come to this, that men must be _reminded that they are walking_.

'It is too much,' he cried; 'these men can get through their dinner

with the help of their own teeth and fingers; they can hear with their

own ears: yet they must have other men's eyes to see for them! They are

in possession of all their faculties: yet they are content to be spoken

to in language which should only be addressed to poor maimed wretches!

And this goes on in broad daylight, in our public places; and among the

sufferers are men who are responsible for the welfare of cities!'

This he said, and much more to the same effect. At length he was

silent. All the time I had listened in awestruck attention, dreading

the moment when he should cease. And when it was all over, my condition

was like that of the Phaeacians. For a long time I gazed upon him,

spellbound; then I was seized with a violent attack of giddiness; I was

bathed in perspiration, and when I attempted to speak, I broke down; my

voice failed, my tongue stammered, and at last I was reduced to tears.

Mine was no surface wound from a random shaft. The words had sunk deep

into a vital part; had come with true aim, and cleft my soul asunder.

For (if I may venture to philosophize on my own account) I conceive the

case thus:-A well-conditioned human soul is like a target of some soft

material. As life goes on, many archers take aim thereat; and every

man's quiver is full of subtle and varied arguments, but not every man

shoots aright. Some draw the bow too tight, and let fly with undue

violence. These hit the true direction, but their shafts do not lodge

in the mark; their impetus carries them right through the soul, and

they pass on their way, leaving only a gaping wound behind them. Others

make the contrary mistake: their bows are too slack, and their shafts

never reach their destination; as often as not their force is spent at

half distance, and they drop to earth. Or if they reach the mark, they

do but graze its surface; there can be no deep wound, where the archer

lacks strength. But a good marksman, a Nigrinus, begins with a careful

examination of the mark, in case it should be particularly soft,—or

again too hard; for there are marks which will take no impression from

an arrow. Satisfied on this point, he dips his shaft, not in the

poisons of Scythia or Crete, but in a certain ointment of his own,

which is sweet in flavour and gentle in operation; then, without more

ado, he lets fly. The shaft speeds with well-judged swiftness, cleaves

the mark right through, and remains lodged in it; and the drug works

its way through every part. Thus it is that men hear his words with

mingled joy and grief; and this was my own case, while the drug was

gently diffusing itself through my soul. Hence I was moved to

apostrophize him in the words of Homer:

So aim; and thou shalt bring (to some) salvation.

For as it is not every man that is maddened by the sound of the

Phrygian flute, but only those who are inspired of Cybele, and by those

strains are recalled to their frenzy,—so too not every man who hears

the words of the philosophers will go away possessed, and stricken at

heart, but only those in whose nature is something akin to philosophy.

_Fr_. These are fearful and wonderful words; nay, they are divine. All

that you said of ambrosia and lotus is true; I little knew how

sumptuous had been your feast. I have listened to you with strange

emotion, and now that you have ceased, I feel oppressed, nay, in your

own language, 'sore stricken.' This need not surprise you. A person who

has been bitten by a mad dog not only goes mad himself, you know, but

communicates his madness to any one whom he bites whilst he is in that

state, so that the infection may be carried on by this means through a

long succession of persons.

_Luc_. Ah, then you confess to a tenderness?

_Fr_. I do; and beg that you will think upon some medicine for both our

wounded breasts.

_Luc_. We must take a hint from Telephus.

_Fr_. What is that?

_Luc_. We want a hair of the dog that bit us.

The Works of Lucian of Samosata — Volume 01 · 第 23 / 167 题