The Second Battle of Newbury was fought on Sunday, October 27, 1644. The

thickest part of it raged round Speen, on the Bath Road, and in the

gardens of Shaw House. This house, one of the finest mansions in

Berkshire, was built by Thomas Dolman, clothier, in 1581. He was evidently

something of a scholar, and worldly wise as well, for he knew that his

riches and his grand mansion would rouse envious talk. Accordingly he

caused Latin and Greek inscriptions to be carved over the entrance, which,

Englished, run--

"Let no envious man enter here."

And--

"The toothless man envies the teeth of those who eat, and the mole

despises the eyes of the roe."

It is quite obvious that Thomas Dolman had been a great deal criticized

locally, and that the iron of that criticism had entered his soul.

His son became Sir Thomas Dolman, and it was his descendant, Sir John

Dolman, who garrisoned the house and entertained King Charles here on the

night before the second battle. A hole is still shown in the panelling of

the drawing-room, said to have been made by a shot fired at the King that

night when standing at the window; and a brass plate records the

circumstance in a Latin inscription.

[Illustration: THE LAST OF THE SMOCK-FROCKS AND BEAVERS.]

The parapets of Shaw House were lined with Royalist musketeers on this

occasion, and entrenchments thrown up in the gardens; but after a

stubbornly contested fight the Royalists were too weakened to retain the

position. Their ordnance and the wounded were left at Donnington Castle, a

mile away, and they fell back upon Oxford. Neither side had been sorry

when night fell and put an end to a hard-fought, but inconclusive, day;

and for their part the Parliamentary leaders were glad to see the King's

forces withdrawing by the light of the moon, and did not dare risk an

attack upon them.

It is not a little singular that during all this clash of arms the

Royalist governor of Donnington Castle held that stronghold, although

repeatedly attacked, from August, 1644, to April, 1646, and then only

surrendered when desired by the King to do so.

[Illustration: CURIOUS OLD TOLL-HOUSE BETWEEN NEWBURY AND HUNGERFORD.]

[Sidenote: _SPEEN_]

The road ascends to Speen, or, as it is often called, "Church Speen." The

present writer was climbing it when he overtook a countryman in a

smock-frock, to whom the steep gradient was evidently anything but

welcome.

"You're a regular Mountjoy, a' b'lieve," said the countryman, puffing and

blowing.

"A regular what?"

"A Mountjoy--a walker. But there; you bain't Newbury?"

I told him I certainly was not a native of that town.

"Well," said he, "you won't, never have heerd of 'un, p'raps."

It seems, then, that about fifty years ago Newbury boasted a pedestrian of

that name, who obtained such a great local reputation that he has become

proverbial with the country people, so that a "regular Mountjoy" is any

one who possesses good walking powers.

Church Speen passed, an undulating road leads past a curiously castellated

old toll-house to Hungerford.

XXVIII

It is at Hungerford, sixty-four miles from Hyde Park Corner, that one

leaves Berkshire and enters Wilts, coming into wilder and less pastoral

country. Hungerford town, however, is just within the Berkshire borders.

The constant Kennet flows across the road here, and is crossed by a

substantial bridge, from whose parapets anglers may be seen patiently

waiting to lure the wily trout from their swims. Fuller quaintly says:

"Good and great trouts are found in the river of Kennet nigh Hungerford;

they are in their perfection in the month of May, and yearly decline with

the buck. Being come to his full growth, he decays in goodness, not

greatness, and thrives in his head till his death. Note, by the way, that

an hog-back and little head is a sign that any fish is in season."

The chief street of Hungerford lies along the road to Salisbury, and the

cyclist who is intent upon "doing" the Bath Road without turning to

thoroughly explore the places along its course, consequently sees little

of the town beyond the few old mansions and cottages, and the old coaching

inn, "The Bear," which front the highway. Not much, however, is in this

case lost, for Hungerford contains little of interest, and were it not for

its singular Hocktide customs, and for the fact that it was the first town

to obtain the free delivery of letters between its post-office and the

houses to which letters were addressed, would scarce demand an extended

notice.

[Sidenote: _OLD POST-OFFICE CUSTOMS_]

The original plan of the General Post-Office, all over the country, was to

allow postmasters of country towns to demand a fee for delivery. Those who

expected letters were supposed to call for them. If they desired them to

be delivered, the additional fee was a penny or twopence, according to the

conscience or the cupidity of the postmaster, whose perquisites these fees

were. This applied to houses quite near post-offices, and even next door

to them. This extraordinary state of affairs was borne with for some time,

until at last several towns brought actions against the Post-Office to

decide if prepaid postage ought not to ensure delivery in the boundaries

of post-towns. Hungerford was selected by the Courts as a typical case,

and secured a judgment in its favour, Michaelmas, 1774.

Hocktide is a stirring time in this little town of less than three

thousand inhabitants. It is determined by Eastertide, and generally falls

in April. The odd observances derive their origin from the conditions

imposed by John of Gaunt, father of Henry the Fourth, who, in the

fourteenth century, conferred the rights and privileges of common-land and

fishing in the Kennet upon the town. To hand down the proof of his gift to

posterity, he presented with the charter a brass horn which bears the

inscription:--

"John a Gaun did giue and

grant the Riall of Fishing to

Hungerford Toune from Eldren

Stub to Irish stil excepting som

Seueral mil Pound

Jehosphat Lucas was Cunstabl."

Not this horn, but its seventeenth-century successor, is jealously

preserved in the Town Hall. It has a capacity of one quart.

[Sidenote: _HOCK TIDE_]

As an unreformed borough, Hungerford still enjoys the old-time custom of

appointing, in the place of Mayor and Corporation, a Constable, Portreeve,

Bailiff, Tithing-men, Keeper of the Keys of the Coffers, Hayward, Water

Bailiffs, Ale-tasters, and Bellman. The ceremonies begin on the Friday

before Hock Tuesday with a "macaroni supper and punchbowl," and are held

at the "John of Gaunt" inn. Tuesday, however, is the great day, when at an

early hour the bellman goes round the borough commanding all those who

hold land or dwellings within the confines of the town to appear at the

Hockney, under pain of a poll-tax of one penny, called the "head-penny."

Lest this warning should be insufficient, he mounts to the balcony of

the Town Hall, where he blows a blast upon the horn. Those who do not obey

the summons and refuse the payment of the head-penny are liable to lose

their rights to the privileges of the borough.

[Illustration: HUNGERFORD.]

By nine o'clock the jury are assembled in the Town Hall for the

transaction of their annual business, and immediately after they are sworn

in, the two tithing-men start on their round of the town. It is in this

part of the proceedings that most interest is taken, for the business of

the tithing-men is to take a poll-tax of twopence from every male

inhabitant and a kiss from the wives and daughters of the burgesses. This

is in recognition of the ancient powers of the Lord of the Manor, who had

peculiar rights over the property and persons of his "chattels," as the

people were once regarded.

[Illustration: HUNGERFORD TUTTI-MEN.]

The tithing-men are known as tutti-men; tutti being the local word for

pretty. They carry short poles as insignia of office, gaily bedecked with

blue ribbons and choice flowers known as tutti-poles; while behind them

walks a man groaning under the weight of the tutti oranges, it being the

custom to bestow an orange upon every person who is kissed, as well as

upon the school and workhouse children. The rights of office having been

duly vested in them by means of strange customs and exhortation, the two

favoured ones start off down the High Street on their kissing mission,

followed by the orange-bearer and greeted with the cheers of the assembled

people. One by one the houses are entered, and the custom observed both in

spirit and letter; nor is it confined to the young and comely, for the old

dames of Hungerford would deem themselves, if not insulted, at least sadly

neglected, were the tutti-men to pass their houses unentered. Usually

these officers find little difficulty in carrying out their pleasant

duties, but sometimes the excitement is increased by some coy maiden,

whose rustic simplicity prompts her to run away or hide. But as a general

rule the ladies of Hungerford show very little objection to the observance

of the ancient customs, so that the labours of the tutti-men are

considerably lightened.

Thus, amid laughter, merriment, and mock-seriousness, the fun is continued

until about half the borough is visited, by which time the tutti-men have

taken care that all the duty kisses that should gratify the ancient

inhabitants have been administered, as well as certain others that are

more a pleasure than a duty. Certainly they deserve well of the town, for

the tutti-men go through a good day's work by the time dinner is served.

Then, in accordance with the time-honoured precedent, the Chief Constable

is elected into the chair; the great bowl of punch is placed on the table

after dinner, and the various offices toasted and replied for. One is

drunk in solemn silence--that of John of Gaunt, the town's benefactor.

All the townspeople seem satisfied with their day's carnival, save,

perhaps, a crooning old burgher, who may occasionally be heard to extol

the good old days when the punch was strong and the newly-elected officers

went home in wheelbarrows.

XXIX

[Sidenote: _LITTLECOTE_]

From the everyday respectable dulness of Hungerford itself we will pass to

the exciting scandals which make up much of the story of Littlecote, that

gloomy and romantic Tudor mansion, which has become famous (or infamous,

if you will have it so) through the crimes and debaucheries of Will

Darell. There are two ways of reaching Littlecote from the Bath Road. The

most obvious way is by turning to the right when in the midst of

Hungerford town; the other, which is the more rural, is by a lane a mile

further down the road. Either will bring the traveller to that secluded

spot in the course of three and a half miles.

It stands, that hoary pile, in a wide and well-wooded park, sheltered

beneath the swelling Wiltshire downs and close beside the gentle Kennet,

whose stream has been fruitful of trout ever since "trouts" (as our

ancestors quaintly called them, in the plural) were angled for.

Littlecote, as we now see it, was built by the Darells in the closing

years of the fifteenth century, in whose early years it had passed from

the Colston family by the marriage of the heiress of the Colstons to

William Darell, son of Sir William Darell, of Sesay, in Yorkshire. A

descendant of this emigrant from the North Riding, the "Wild Will Darell"

of this blood-boltered history was born into an estate comprising an

ancestral home and many thousands of acres in the counties of Wilts,

Berks, and Hants, and might have been accounted fortunate had it not been

for the rather more than trifling circumstances of an unhappy up-bringing

which included a shameful treatment of himself and his mother by an

unnatural father; the paternal extravagances which had alienated much of

the property; the heavy charge made on the estate for the benefit of the

mistress of his brother, who preceded him in the estate; and, finally, the

crop of lawsuits into which he was plunged immediately upon succeeding to

this singularly-encumbered patrimony. At this interval of time it has

become quite impossible for serious historians to discriminate between the

facts and the--fancies, shall we call them?--of the Wild Darell story.

This difficulty does not arise from lack of patient research on the part

of Darell commentators, who have ransacked the Record Office to prove that

he was _not_ a villain of the most lurid kind, or the industry of others

who have searched among musty muniment chests to determine that he _was_.

It would, considering the fact of the records in the Littlecote muniment

room not having yet been explored for the benefit of these historic

doubts, be rash indeed for any one to pronounce definitely for either of

the very diverse views held of Darell as Villain, or Darell as Good Young

Man.

The story, which first became widely known through a footnote appended to

Sir Walter Scott's "Rokeby," is of a midwife summoned from the village of

Shefford, seven miles away, on a false pretence of attending Lady Knyvett,

of Charlton, near by, and of her being blindfolded and led on horseback in

the darkness of the night to quite another house, in one of whose stately

rooms lay a mysterious masked lady for whom her services were required.

The horrid legend then goes on to say that a tall, slender gentleman, a

lowering and ferocious-looking man, "havinge uppon hym a goune of blacke

velvett," entered the room with some others, and, without a word, took the

child from her arms and threw it upon a blazing fire in an ante-room,

crushing it into the flaming logs with his boot-heel, so that it was

presently consumed.

A prime horror, this, and rich in ferocity, mystery, and all the

incertitude that comes of age and conflicting testimony. Masked lady,

blindfolded nurse, burnt baby, taciturn and horrible stranger, what lurid

figures are these! and how royally abused for the possession of an

over-imaginative mind would be that novelist who should dare conceive

incidents so romantic!

[Sidenote: _WILD DARELL_]

Scott gleaned his traditions from the weird legends current in the

country-side. They had, when he first printed them, been the fireside

gossip of that district for over two hundred years, and of course in that

length of time had lost nothing in the repetition. For that reason we are

asked nowadays to discredit them altogether. We cannot, however, do that,

because there came to light some years ago the actual deposition to the

facts made by the midwife, Mrs. Barnes of Shefford, taken down on her

deathbed by a Mr. Bridges of Great Shefford, a magistrate, who was also a

cousin of Darell, and would not, it may well be supposed, be inclined to

spread any baseless gossip to the hurt of a family with which he was

connected. This deposition tells the story as already narrated. It does

not identify Darell or Littlecote, nor does it even hint the identity of

_any_ person or place. But the sinister discovery, some twenty years ago,

at Longleat, of an original letter from Sir H. Knyvett, of Charlton, to

Sir John Thynne, of Longleat, dated January 2, 1578/9 (about the time of

the midwife's confession), brings us to the original rumours pointing to

Darell's being the man and Littlecote the place.

[Illustration: LITTLECOTE.]

[Sidenote: _DEATH OF DARELL_]

There was then residing at Longleat a Mr. Bonham, whose sister was well

known to be living with Darell as his mistress, and this letter requests

that "Mr. Bonham will inquire of his sister touching her usage at Will.

Darell's, the birth of her children, how many there were, and what became

of them: for that the report of the murder of one of them was increasing

foully, and would touch Will. Darell to the quick." To that letter there

is no reply, and it remains uncertain whether Darell was ever arraigned

for murder and acquitted (as the story goes), or whether the rumours

simply were never crystallized into a definite charge against him. The

probability seems to be that he never was called upon to stand his trial.

It is quite certain, however, that the legend of his being haunted along

the roads by the apparition of a burning infant which startled his horse

so that Wild Darell was thrown and killed is a more or less pleasing

invention. Darell died quite peacefully in his bed, at Littlecote, eleven

years after the midwife's death, and was buried in the Darell Chapel at

Ramsbury, where he was laid to rest, October 1st, 1589. Notwithstanding

these well-ascertained facts, Darell is now, if we are to credit the

stories of the country-side, an apparition himself, and superstitious

rustics still fear to face the roads o' nights because of a Burning Babe

and a Spectral Horseman, who comes dashing down them at a terror-stricken

gallop, mounted on a horse of coal-black hue, with a breath like steam and

eyes like burning coals!

As for the elaborate embroideries added to the Wild Darell story from time

to time, there are many. According to these ingenious fictions, the

midwife counted the stairs of the strange house, and cut a piece out of

the bed curtains, which she carried away. By these means; by finding the

number of the stairs at Littlecote to tally with her counting, and by

fitting her piece of tapestry to a hole in the curtains of a bed at

Littlecote, we are told to believe the truth of the story. The singular

thing, however, is that Mrs. Barnes made absolutely no mention of these

things in her deposition. There remains, it is true, the fact already

alluded to, that the magistrate who took down the woman's statement was a

connection of Darell's, and might possibly have suppressed facts which

could point to his relative being concerned in the affair. Another story

is that upon Darell being arraigned (which in itself is uncertain), he

made interest with Sir John Popham, the Chief Justice, to procure an

acquittal.

[Illustration: THE HAUNTED CHAMBER.]

Now it is quite certain that Popham did not become Chief Justice until

1592, when Darell had been in his grave nearly three years, and could not

therefore have done so. He was, it is true, Attorney-General at the time

of Darell's supposed crime, and, _had_ there been a trial, and _had_ he

been bribed, could possibly have procured a _nolle prosequi_.

But Darell certainly made over the reversion of Littlecote to Popham in

1586, and Popham took possession upon Darell's decease. The story of this

transaction being the bribe in question we owe to Aubrey, the county

historian (or rather, the county gossip), who actually gives an account of

the trial and says, "Sir John Popham gave sentence according to law, but

being a great person and a favourite, he pronounced a _noli prosequi_."

More to the point is the fact that Darell, in 1583, offered Lord

Chancellor Bromley the then large sum of L5000 to be "his good friend."

Those who are interested in the Darell story are equally divided as to his

general character. One would have us believe that he was a Model Squire,

who fished for trout, took an enthralling interest in his flower-garden,

and if he did not always come home to tea (because tea not having at that

period been introduced, it was impossible to do so), was content with a

modest pint of claret at dinner, and spent the rest of the evening in

reading what improving literature was to be had in the Elizabethan age;

which, I fear, judging from the general character of the time, was of a

somewhat meagre nature.

[Sidenote: _THE REAL DARELL_]

The real Darell was not quite like that picture. We already know that he

had one mistress at Littlecote, and then there was Lady Anne Hungerford,

an elderly charmer, whom by some means Wild Will had seduced from her

husband, and whose letters, still preserved, to her "deare Dorrell" are

not so improving as the recipient's other reading. One learns from these

choice communications that Lady Anne had been accused of murder, adultery,

and trying to poison her husband; and, under the circumstances, it seems

quite likely that all these charges were well-founded, even though she

says that "luker and gaine makes many dissembling and hollow hearts"

(which sounds like one of the admirable copy-book maxims of our youth),

and that she anticipates being cleared from suspicion of these "vill and

abomynabell practiscis." Add to these hot-blooded intrigues the

extravagances which, together with his litigious disposition, served to

ruin his estate and to bring him into disfavour with his neighbours, and

we obtain the genesis of all the ill-favoured legends of this picturesque

figure of the Elizabethan era.

XXX

[Sidenote: _THE GREAT REBELLION_]

Littlecote had not done with stirring scenes when Darell was dead and the

Pophams took possession. The Great Hall, hung round with pikes, leather

jerkins, helmets, and cuirasses of Cromwellian times, serves to tell, in

its warlike array, of how the place became a rendezvous of the Roundheads

of this vicinity. These relics are the arms and accoutrements of the

Popham Horse, raised by Colonel Alexander Popham, whose own suit of armour

is still suspended here, over one of the doorways. A fitting place this,

then, for that gathering of the King's Commissioners who came to

Littlecote in December, 1688. The occasion was an historic one. James the

Second was tottering upon his throne, and the Prince of Orange, invited to

these shores to protect the civil and religious liberties of the nation,

had marched up with his Dutchmen from his landing in the West Country. No

man knew what would be the course of events, because not one of those

concerned in that memorable crisis knew his own mind, from the King and

his adherents on the one side, to the Prince and his partisans on the

other.

The two parties met at Hungerford on December 8. On the following day,

Sunday, the Commissioners dined at Littlecote, and then and there the fate

of the kingdom was settled, quite amicably. The old Hall was crowded with

Peers and Generals--Halifax, the judicious "trimmer," whose cautious

diplomacy guided the crisis through to its solution without bloodshed;

Burnet, Nottingham, Shrewsbury, and Oxford, all waiting upon events.

Halifax, the partisan of the King, seized the opportunity of extracting

from Burnet all he knew and thought. "Do you wish to get the King into

your power?" he asked the Bishop. "Not at all," replied Burnet: "we would

not do the least harm to his person." "And if he were to go away?" slyly

insinuated Halifax. "There is nothing so much to be wished," whispered the

Bishop, apprehending his meaning; and so James slunk away, and William of

Orange reigned in his stead.

For the rest, Littlecote is a veritable storehouse of art and antiquities.

The collection of ancient armour in the Great Hall is one of the finest in

England. Here, too, is Chief Justice Popham's chair, and the thumbstocks

which he used as a means of extracting confessions from petty offenders

with whom persuasion of the merely moral kind had failed. Then there is

the painting of Mr. Popham's horse, "Wild Dayrell," which won the Derby in

1855, and many interesting objects besides. First in point of interest,

however, is the Haunted Chamber, which is even now said to resound with

groans and imprecations; and is still very much in the same condition as

in Darell's day, although, to be sure, the fateful ante-room is now

divided from it. Darell's Tree, an ancient elm, patched and chained

together, is still to be seen on the south side of the house, carefully

tended; the legend running that Littlecote will flourish so long as its

hoary trunk holds together.

XXXI

But to return to the road, which presently comes to the charming village

of Froxfield, with its wide village green and great red-brick barracks of

almshouses, founded in 1686 by Sarah, Duchess of Somerset, for fifty

clergymen's widows, and perched up on a bank above the right-hand side of

the highway.

[Sidenote: _SAVERNAKE FOREST_]

The Bath Road: History, Fashion, & Frivolity on an Old Highway · 第 8 / 13 段