J. C. R.

_Few Descents through a long Period._--The pedigree of the noble family

of Dartmouth, given by Edmondson in his _Baronagium Genealogicum_, No.

197., contains an extraordinary instance of few descents through a long

period of time.

The stock of descent is Thomas Legge, Sheriff of London in 1343, and

Lord Mayor in 1346. He had a son, Simon, whose son, Thomas, had issue,

William, who had issue an only son, Edward. This Edward had thirteen

children, one of whom, John, is stated to have died in 1702, aged 109.

Supposing Thomas Legge to have been 46 years old at his Mayoralty

(_i.e._ born in 1300) these six lives would extend over more than 400

years. This is so extraordinary that I append a Query. Is Edmondson's

_Genealogy_ correct, or are there any intermediate descents omitted?

The ages at death of four only of Edward's children are given, and they,

too, are remarkable: the before-mentioned John, aged 109 years;

Elizabeth (unmarried), 105 years; Margaret (married ---- Fitzgerald,

Esq.), 105 years; and Anne (married ---- Anthony, Esq.), 112 years. Can

any of your correspondents inform me the years when any of these died,

or where they are buried? to enable me to verify these facts by

certificates.

Notes and Queries, Vol. V, Number 127, April 3, 1852 A Medium of Inter-communication for Literary Men, Artists, Antiquaries, Genealogists, etc. · 第 117 / 167 题