CHAPTER XXIV

TRAITS OF CHARACTER

As the natural disposition with which a child enters this world,

restrained though it may be by caution or fear of public opinion from

expressing itself in acts, remains unaltered till he leaves it, so the

character of natural man is untouched, even superficially, by the decay

of his customary law. The surface of the lake is lashed into foam by the

passing squall; but a fathom beneath the water lies untroubled.

Though the Fijian character has been described as full of

contradictions, when it is examined by the light of their moral code,

which differs vitally in some respect from ours, it will be found to be

as consistent as our own. How, it may be asked, can a people addicted to

cannibalism and to acts of ferocious cruelty be the most timid, polite

and hospitable of mankind? To any one intimately acquainted with the

people these facts are perfectly consistent, though it is a little

difficult to reconcile them in cold print. Timidity, as Williams stated

many years ago, is the key to the Fijian character. Beset by a myriad

perils from the cradle-mat to the burial-cave, he went in terror of his

life. On the one hand there were the Unseen Powers quick to avenge every

infringement of a tabu, however unwitting; on the other was his own

chief, quick to take offence, and beyond him the enemy, ever ready to

waylay the unwary in a lonely part of the road. In such an atmosphere

the cardinal virtues do not thrive, and it is not to be wondered at that

the Fijian was suspicious, and held craft and adroit lying in high

esteem. He was polite and hospitable, because, with so many enemies

already, his instinct was always to convert every new potential foe

into an ally, or at least not to give him an excuse for thinking himself

slighted. His cruelty also proceeded in part from timidity. "_Moku na

katikati_" (Slay the women and children) was, as a Christian native once

assured me, a sound maxim, for the object in war was to crush your enemy

beyond the power of retaliation, and women and children breed avengers

to harass your old age. The horrible cruelties inflicted on captives

were in part propitiations to the War-god, and in part the same

thoughtless love of mischief that moves English school-boys to tie a

kettle to a dog's tail, because its sufferings are amusing to watch, and

they do not understand.

[Pageheader: CONTRADICTIONS IN CHARACTER]

The sympathies of the Fijian reached to the limit of his tribe and no

further, but within that limit they were active enough. After torturing,

mutilating, and devouring his helpless captives, the warrior washed off

his war-paint, went home and played with his children, received his

visitors with stately politeness, and performed his part in the ornate

and elaborate ceremonial of social life. Both phases were custom, and to

his mind not in the least incongruous.

In the matter of lying he drew a nice distinction. It was a crime to lie

to his chief; it was, if not a virtue, at least a title to public

admiration to display something cruder than the craft of Odysseus to an

enemy, or to a person not a member of his tribe. The maxim "All is fair

in love and war" was applied literally. To pretend alliance, and then

treacherously to smite the ally from behind, as Namosimalua did to the

people of Naingani, was more esteemed than barren courage. I have heard

a young chief boast of having gratified his passion by compelling the

lover of the girl he coveted to overcome her scruples while he hid in

the dark behind him, so that at the last he might push him aside and

personate him. In these days the European has dropped easily into the

place formerly occupied by the extra-tribal man. By an administrative

fiction the Governor of the colony is supreme chief over the natives,

and the natives have fallen easily into the habit of paying him all the

external marks of respect which are due to their own chiefs, even,

rather incongruously, greeting him with the _tama_, or shout of respect

which is due only to the chief in whom is enshrined the ancestral

spirit of the man who utters it. There have been governors who have been

deceived into the belief that they really enjoy _ex officio_ the

prestige of a supreme chief, and that the natives will not dare to lie

to them. In 1888 an European named Stewart was murdered on the Sambeto

coast. Another European was arrested and tried for the crime, but the

issue was confused by a number of native witnesses, who came forward

with two wholly incompatible stories, both designed to fasten the guilt

upon the accused man. One of these stories hung upon a letter said to

have been written by a petty chief who in heathen times would have held

an office akin to that of hereditary executioner. The governor

interrogated this man, and, convinced from his knowledge of native

character that the man would not dare to lie solemnly to his supreme

chief, accepted the story, and placed the matter in my hands as Acting

Head of the Native Office. Everything turned upon the question whether

the man had himself written the letter, and I knew that he could not

write, but since the Governor could not be convinced without proof, I

induced him to send for the chief, and put my statement to the test. I

could not help admiring the native's courage and persistence. Even when

writing materials were put before him in the Governor's presence, and he

was ordered to copy a verse from the Fijian Bible, he did not falter.

For a full ten minutes he plodded away with an implement that he had

never had between his fingers before, trailing a drunken zigzag across

the paper like the track of a fly rescued from drowning in an inkpot. He

took his unmasking with quiet dignity, however, and the murder remains a

mystery to this day. To his own chief he would not have lied: the

Governor of the colony was simply a foreigner to whom he owed no

allegiance.

[Pageheader: DEFRAUDING WITH DIGNITY]

Europeans hold opinions regarding the honesty of Fijians according to

their individual experience. There is no equivalent for the word in the

language, though there is a word for theft. In the ancient moral code

theft and cheating were virtues or vices according to whether they were

practised upon a stranger or a member of the tribe and inasmuch as the

white man falls into the former category, and is possessed of priceless

treasures to boot, it was not to be expected that the Fijian would

regard cheating him as an offence against morality. It was an injury,

and since to injure a man who had befriended you is a mean action,

public opinion would mildly condemn the robbing of a friendly white man.

Cheating and theft really date from the arrival of Europeans, for in the

small communities of the old time it was well-nigh impossible to rob a

fellow-tribesman without being found out, and to despoil an enemy was,

as it is with us, legitimate.

In the matter of dishonesty it is, of course, the country storekeeper

who suffers most, and it is therefore he who gives the Fijian the worst

character. The native, from the highest to the lowest, will run into

debt under the most solemn promises, and would never pay unless induced

by cajolery, or compelled under the pressure of a refusal to give

further credit. Even so he will display great ingenuity. A few years ago

the Government, anxious to introduce copper coinage into a colony where

a silver threepenny piece was the lowest currency, tried the experiment

of paying a portion of the tax refund in copper. The natives showed a

great unwillingness to accept it, but the late Roko Tui Lau, an old

chief noted for his stately and dignified manners, won the gratitude of

his people by including all the copper coins in his own share. On the

following day, accompanied by his train carrying bags of money, he

presented himself at the German store, where his credit had long been

overstrained, and intimated that he had come to pay off his debts. The

heavy bags were clapped on the counter, and the unsuspecting trader,

believing the coins to be florins, pressed fresh supplies upon his

illustrious client, who loaded his men with goods and departed. The

trader's feelings (and, I suspect, his language) when he came to open

the bags and found not a florin among the lot, need not be dwelt upon.

The commoner forms of dishonesty--putting white stones among the

_yankona_, and watering the tobacco and the copra to increase the

weight--are well-nigh universal, and there have been a few instances of

childish attempts at forgery among domestic servants, but when the

Fijians are compared with Indian coolies, it must be confessed that

pilfering is rare. I have myself lived for years in native districts

without a door to my house, which has stood open night and day even in

my absences, and I can only recall one theft of a few shillings. A

Fijian servant will sometimes secrete a thing which he covets to see

whether it is missed. If inquiries are made for it he will be most

active in the search, and will eventually discover it in some unlikely

place, hoping to acquire merit by his diligence, but deceiving nobody.

On the other hand, money is a temptation which few natives can resist,

and it is to be feared that few native magistrates or scribes have not

at some time or other borrowed from the funds entrusted to them. They

might well plead the excuse that their wants and the calls of

hospitality have greatly increased, while their wretched salaries of

from L3 to L12 a year have not. It is much to say for them that bribery

is uncommon, and that though they may show partiality in the

administration of justice they are not corrupt.

Considering what must appear to the Fijian as the fabulous wealth of the

white man, unprotected save by a wooden wall and a crazy door, and so

temptingly placed at the mercy of the village as is the native store, it

is surprising that house-breaking is not more frequent. It is the belief

of many Fijians that every white man has a chest of money in his house,

and occasionally some restless spirit organizes a burglary among his

chosen associates. I have related elsewhere[103] how Kaikai robbed a

store at Navua, set it on fire, and sank the safe in the bed of the

river, but in order to show the school-boy light-hearted inconsequence

of the burglars, I may repeat here the confession of one of them:--

[Pageheader: NATIVE BUSHRANGERS]

"Sir, the root of the matter was Kaikai. He seduced us to do this

thing. We therefore are innocent. It happened thus: Kaikai came

into our house in the evening and said 'Eroni, let us have

prayers.' So we had prayers. Then Kaikai said, 'How would it be to

break open the white man's store?' And we said, 'It is well.' And

when we came near the store, Kaikai said, 'How would it be to set

the store on fire, and then perhaps the white man will come out?'

So we set the store on fire, and presently the white man did come

out. Then Kaikai said, 'Let us trample him.' And so we did, and

having put the chest of money in the river, we all went home."

"And what did you do then?" asked the Court.

"Kaikai said prayers."

A similar case occurred in Vanualevu, while the Australian papers were

of full of the exploits of the Kelly gang of bushrangers. Fired by the

halting translation of the local storekeeper, three otherwise blameless

youths, church-goers every one, resolved to take to the bush and make

the world ring with the story of their crimes. They began tentatively by

setting fire to an empty house, and waxing bolder, they waylaid an

elderly German storekeeper in broad day, and by dint of yelling their

tribal war-cry into his ears, put sufficient heart into themselves to

cut him down with a hatchet. A couple of mission teachers, attracted by

their shouts, put them to flight, and thereafter they seem to have lost

heart, for a week later their dead bodies were discovered far up the

mountain. They had perished like the Fijian widows of old. Two of them

had strangled the third by hauling on the loose ends of a noose of

bark-cloth; the first had then strangled the second by tying one end of

the noose to a tree, and pulling on the other, and had then hanged

himself, English fashion, from a bough.

Though naturally so timid, the Fijian has shown himself upon occasion to

be capable of extraordinary courage and self-devotion, generally,

however, when assailed by the forces of nature. There is no reason to

doubt the truth of the story that a Kandavu chief, whose canoe capsized

a mile from the Serua reef, when attacked by sharks, was protected by

his men, who formed a ring round him as he swam. As man after man was

dragged down, the rest closed in, until there were but three left to

reach the shore. I myself questioned two girls, the survivors of a party

of twelve, who had been picked up by a cutter off the mouth of the Rewa,

after all their companions had been devoured by sharks, and they had

been eight hours swimming in a rough sea. They described without a

shudder how a huge shark, glutted with the body of the last of their

playmates, had rubbed himself along their naked backs as they swam, and

had played about them until the moment of their rescue. Their fortitude

seemed, however, to be due to a lack of imagination.

To the European the natives must always seem wanting in natural

affection. Parents are fond of their children until sickness calls for

sustained effort or self-sacrifice, but their love will not bear the

strain of these. As with all races such affection as there is tends

downward and not upward. The mother is fonder of her child than the

child of his mother. In the old days the young man obeyed his father,

because he was one of the elders, the repositories of tribal lore, not

because he was his father; but when the father grew infirm he helped to

bury him alive without a trace of emotion beyond the mourning which

customary law enjoined. In these days of schools and Government

employment the young man regards the opinion of his elders no more. A

few years ago the senior Wesleyan missionary appealed to one of

Thakombau's sons to mend his ways, saying, "What would the chief, your

father, have said?" The young man jerked his thumb contemptuously

towards the tomb on the hill above them, and replied, "My father? Why,

he's dead." While there is a certain comradeship between brothers and

the first cousins who are classed as brothers, the customary law that

forbids brothers and sisters to speak to one another is a bar to any

affection between these. On the other hand, there is loyalty and

fidelity between husbands and wives, though it is more perhaps the

mutual regard of partners in the same firm than warm attachment. The

only instance of demonstrative family affection that I can recall

occurred in Lomaloma when a prisoner sentenced by the Provincial Court

was being sent on board a vessel bound for Levuka. His aged mother

caught hold of him, to prevent him from entering the boat, wailing and

storming at the native policeman by turns. When they had been separated

by force, and he was fairly afloat, she cast herself down on the beach,

shrieking and throwing the sand over her head in utter abandonment of

grief. Though not more noisy, this was a very different exhibition from

the ceremonial wailing at a death. At the funeral of Tui Nandrau, one of

the last of the cannibal chiefs, I came upon two or three of the widows

howling with dry eyes, like dogs baying the moon. Seeing me, one of them

nudged her neighbour to point me out, and grinned knowingly, and then

drowned her sister wives in a howl of peculiar shrillness and poignancy.

During a cricket match at Lomaloma a canoe arrived carrying news of the

death of the father of one of the bowlers. At the end of the over his

aunt came over to the pitch to tell him, and I overheard the

conversation.

[Pageheader: CEREMONIAL WAILING]

"Here is a painful thing," she said; "Wiliame is dead. Pita has just

landed and brought the news."

"O Veka!" exclaimed the boy.

"How then? Shall we wail now, or after the game is finished?"

They discussed the point for a few moments. There were, it seemed, only

three female relations on the ground, and if the others were sent for it

would make a braver show. The boy decided the point. "Send for them," he

said, "and let us finish the match first; then we can weep."

As soon as the last wicket was down I was startled by a piercing shriek

from the scoring tent: the wailing had begun. The aunt and half-a-dozen

old crones were howling "_Oo-au-e-e_" with a peculiar long-drawn wail,

ending in a sob, while real tears coursed down their wrinkled cheeks. It

was difficult to believe that the grief was only simulated.

The reasoning power of the Fijian is not easy to classify. He is

extraordinarily observant, and in respect of natural phenomena he shows

a high power of deduction. He is an acute weather-prophet; he knows the

name and the nature of every tree and almost every plant that grows in

his forest; he is a most skilful gardener. A broken twig, a fallen

berry, are enough for him to assert positively where a wild hog has its

lair; he knows by the look of the weather where the fish are to be

found. He will tell you correctly from a footprint in the sand which of

his fellow-villagers has passed that way and when, and whether he went

in haste or leisurely, for he knows the footprints of his people as he

knows their faces, and will swear to them in court. He will probe the

secret motive that lay behind every action of one of his own people, and

he is beginning to draw deductions even from the manner of Europeans.

"Mr. ----," a Fijian once said to me of a colleague of blunt manners,

"is from Scotland. I suppose that Scotland is a 'bush' village!"

When justice has to be defeated he is remarkably acute in the story he

will concoct. Assembling the false witnesses into a house by night, he

will cunningly dissect it, dictating to each witness the part he is to

tell, repeating it over and over until the man has it by heart, even

interpolating some trifling discrepancy, so as to render it more

life-like. It is only by showing in cross-examination that none of the

witnesses will budge an inch beyond his original narrative that the

fraud can be detected.

Fijian boys, educated at an European school, are probably quite equal in

capacity and intelligence to European boys of the same age, but, though

there has hitherto been no case in which their education has been

continued beyond boyhood, there is no reason to think that this equality

would not be maintained through manhood. In early boyhood they show some

talent for arithmetic, and an extraordinary power of learning by rote.

Those who had been sent to school in Sydney speak English with but

little foreign accent. For drawing, for science, and for mechanics they

do not appear to have much aptitude. As might be expected from a people

to whom oratory comes easily, they write with ease, and their letters

and articles for the native newspaper, _Na Mata_, show close reasoning,

and sometimes scathing satire. One contributor, Ilai Moto-ni-thothoka,

displayed both imagination and literary talent.

[Pageheader: PRODUCTS OF THE TRAINING SCHOOL]

In education, however, the Fijian has never had a fair chance. The

Wesleyan and Roman Catholic Missions support native teachers in every

village in the colony, and every child learns something of reading and

writing. The teachers themselves are educated at training schools, where

more attention, naturally, is paid to fitting them for their duties as

local preachers than to giving them secular education. The two

Government enterprises, the technical school and the school for native

medical students, have not been a marked success. The boys leave the

technical school with a fair knowledge of carpentry and smithing, but as

soon as they return home the fecklessness of village life crushes all

the enterprise out of them. Either a powerful chief expects them to work

for him without pay, or relations swoop down upon them, borrow their

tools, and force them back into the daily round in the village community

to which they were born. Therein lies the secret: Custom again asserts

herself. The native hereditary _matai_ (carpenter), whose labour and

remuneration were alike prescribed by Custom, plies his adze with profit

to himself: Custom never contemplated a Government-taught carpenter; she

intended the boy to take his turn at yam-planting and hut-thatching, and

she revolts. She treats the native medical practitioner in the same

fashion. During his three years' training at Suva Hospital he may have

shown great aptitude; he may know by rote the uncouth Fijian version of

his Pharmacopoeia, in which tincture is _tinkatura_, and acid is

_asiti_; he may even have acquired some skill in diagnosis. But no

sooner is he turned adrift in his district with his medicine chest than

complaints begin to come in. He has demanded from the chief four porters

to carry his chest without payment; he is behaving like a chief,

demanding food wherever he goes, and interfering with the customs of the

people; and, at last, he is doing nothing for his pay, and his chest is

rotting in an outhouse. He has his own tale to tell: the porters dropped

his box and broke the bottles; the chief stole all his _masima Episomi_

(Epsom salts), the most popular of his drugs, and what is a doctor to do

who has nothing but _belusitoni_ (blue-stone) with which to treat his

patients? It was not many months before Dr. Corney, the Chief Medical

Officer, who had trained them with so much care, was fain to confess

that the native medical practitioner was a failure.

It is perhaps the strength of the Fijian race that education makes so

slight an impression upon his habits and character. The esteem of his

own people is more to him than that of strangers, and, if he has been

brought up by Europeans in English dress, he will revert to the national

costume as soon as he is back in his native village. Ratu Epeli, the

late Roko Tui Ndreketi, insisted on wearing the _sulu_ even in Calcutta,

and cared nothing for the notice he attracted. The Tongans, on the other

hand, and the other Melanesian races love nothing better than to dress

up as white men. Most of the chiefs will dine with you with perfect

decorum, and use a knife and fork as if they had been born to them, but

in their own houses they will sit upon the ground and eat with their

fingers as their fathers did. They have adopted such of our inventions

as are better than their own--our boats, our lamps and our

dishes--merely for convenience, but they care nothing for contrivances

that entail a change of habit. The native carpenter, whose only tool is

the adze, will buy a Sheffield blade, but he will mount it on the same

handle as his fathers used in the age of stone, and will explain, with

some reason, that the movable socket, which enables him to cut a surface

at right angles to the handle, is an invention that we should do well to

adopt.

Though they have a considerable body of traditional poetry, the Fijians

cannot be said to have much literary taste. The _mekes_ are mythological

and historical, and in the latter the fiction of exaggeration is freely

mingled with fact. Without a native commentator they are difficult to

translate, being often cast in the form of a dialogue without any

indication of a change of speaker. In descriptions of the deaths of

heroes the dirge is put into the mouth of the dead hero himself. Boating

songs, lullabies, love songs and descriptions of scenery are not to be

found in the native poem. In their indifference to the beauty of nature

they are in sharp contrast to the Tongans, whose songs are full of

admiration for flowers, running water and lovely scenery.

[Pageheader: HISTORICAL POETRY]

They judge the merit of a poem by the uniformity of metre and the

regularity with which every line in a stanza ends with the same vowel or

diphthong. This is secured by a plentiful use of expletives, by

abbreviating or prolonging words, by omitting articles, and other

poetic licence, but in very few is this kind of rhyme carried out

consistently. Some bards profess to be inspired. Others make no such

pretensions, but set about their business in the prosaic manner of a

literary hack. They teach their compositions to bands of youths who

master every detail of the poem in a single evening. It is then as

permanent and unalterable as if it had been set up in type. I had a

curious instance of the remarkable verbal memory of Fijians in a long

poem taken down from the lips of an old woman in 1893. The poem had been

published by Waterhouse twenty-seven years earlier, and on comparison

only one verbal discrepancy between the two versions was found. Repeated

from mouth to mouth, a popular poem will travel far beyond the district

in which its dialect is spoken, and thus one may often hear mekes whose

meaning is not understood by the singers. English popular songs, heard

once or twice, will thus run through the group corrupted into Fijian

words that have the nearest sound to the English ones. The common

_yankona meke_ conveys no meaning whatever to the modern Fijian, but it

is not necessarily very ancient, for it may be the corruption of a poem

composed in a local dialect.

The popularity of an historical _meke_ is not often more than sixty

years; those that are older survive only in fragments. The Mission

schools have enormously increased the output of trivial and ephemeral

poetry; at every annual school feast the children perform _mekes_,

celebrating petty incidents of village life, composed by their native

teacher, and the old tragic historical poetry has fallen upon evil days

and may soon be heard no more.

FOOTNOTES:

[Footnote 103: _The Indiscretions of Lady Asenath._]

The Fijians: A Study of the Decay of Custom · 第 25 / 33 章