Section 5. Religious Festivals.

For it was in ritual and art, not in propositions, that the Greek

religion expressed itself; and in this respect it was closer to the

Roman Catholic than to the Protestant branch of the Christian faith. The

plastic genius of the race, that passion to embody ideas in form, which

was at the root, as we saw, of their whole religious outlook, drove them

to enact for their own delight, in the most beautiful and telling forms,

the whole conception they had framed of the world and of themselves. The

changes of the seasons, with the toil they exact and the gifts they

bring, the powers of generation and destruction, the bounty or the

rigours of the earth; and on the other hand, the order and operations of

social phenomena, the divisions of age and sex, of function and of rank

in the state--all these took shape and came, as it were, to self-

consciousness in a magnificent series of publicly ordered _fetes_.

So numerous were these and so diverse in their character that it would

be impossible, even if it were desirable in this place, to give any

general account of them. Our purpose will be better served by a

description of two, selected from the calendar of Athens, and typical,

the one of the relations of man to nature, the other of his relation to

the state. The festivals we have chosen are those known as the

"Anthesteria" [Footnote: This interpretation of the meaning of the

"Anthesteria" is not accepted by modern scholars. It is not, however,

for typographical reasons, convenient to remove it from the text, and

the error is of no importance for the purpose of this book.] and the

"Panathenaea."

The Anthesteria was held at that season of the year when, as Pindar

sings in an ode composed to be sung upon the occasion, "the chamber of

the Hours is opened and the blossoms hear the voice of the fragrant

spring; when violet clusters are flung on the lap of earth, and chaplets

of roses braided in the hair; when the sound of the flute is heard and

choirs chanting hymns to Semele." On the natural side the festival

records the coming of spring and the fermenting of last year's wine; on

the spiritual, its centre is Dionysus, who not only was the god of wine,

but, according to another legend, symbolised in his fate the death of

the year in winter and its rebirth at spring.

The ceremonies open with a scene of abandoned jollity; servants and

slaves are invited to share in the universal revel; the school holidays

begin; and all the place is alive with the bustle and fun of a great

fair. Bargaining, peep-shows, conjuring, and the like fill up the hours

of the day; and towards evening the holiday-makers assemble garlanded

and crowned in preparation for the great procession. The procession

takes place by torch-light; the statue of Dionysus leads the way, and

the revellers follow and swarm about him, in carriages or on foot,

costumed as Hours or Nymphs or Bacchae in the train of the god of wine.

The destination is the temple of the god and there sacrifice is

performed with the usual accompaniment of song and dance; the whole

closing with a banquet and a drinking contest, similar to those in vogue

among the German students. Aristophanes has described the scene for us--

"Couches, tables,

Cushions and coverlets for mattresses,

Dancing and singing-girls for mistresses,

Plum cake and plain, comfits and caraways,

Confectionery, fruits preserved and fresh,

Relishes of all sorts, hot things and bitter,

Savouries and sweets, broiled biscuits and what not;

Flowers and perfumes, and garlands, everything."

[Footnote: Aristoph. Ach. 1090.--Frere's translation.]

and in the midst of this the signal given by the trumpet, the

simultaneous draught of wine, and the prize adjudged to the man who is

the first to empty his cup.

Thus ends the first phase of the festival. So far all has been mirth and

revelry; but now comes a sudden change of tone. Dionysus, god of wine

though he be, has also his tragic aspect; of him too there is recorded a

"descent into hell"; and to the glad celebration of the renewal of life

in spring succeeds a feast in honour of the dead. The ghosts, it is

supposed, come forth to the upper air; every door-post is smeared with

pitch to keep off the wandering shades; and every family sacrifices to

its own departed. Nor are the arts forgotten; a musical festival is

held, and competing choirs sing and dance in honour of the god.

Such, so far as our brief and imperfect records enable us to trace it,

was the ritual of a typical Greek festival. With the many questions that

might be raised as to its origin and development we need not concern

ourselves at present; what we have to note is the broad fact,

characteristic of the genius of the Greeks, that they have taken the

natural emotions excited by the birth of spring, and by connecting them

with the worship of Dionysus have given them expression and form; so

that what in its origin was a mere burst of primitive animal spirits is

transmuted into a complex and beautiful work of art, the secret springs

and fountains of physical life flowing into the forms of a spiritual

symbol. It is this that is the real meaning of all ceremonial, and this

that the Greeks better than any other people understood. Their religion,

one may almost say, consisted in ritual; and to attempt to divide the

inner from the outer would be to falsify from the beginning its

distinctive character.

Let us pass to our second illustration, the great city-festival of

Athens. In the Anthesteria it was a moment of nature that was seized and

idealized; here, in the Panathenaea, it is the forms of social life, its

distinctions within its embracing unity, that are set forth in their

interdependence as functions of a spiritual life. In this great national

fete, held every four years, all the higher activities of Athenian life

were ideally displayed--contests of song, of lyre and of flute, foot and

horse races, wrestling, boxing, and the like, military evolutions of

infantry and horse, pyrrhic dances symbolic of attack and defence in

war, mystic chants of women and choruses of youths--the whole

concentring and discharging itself in that great processional act in

which, as it were, the material forms of society became transparent, and

the Whole moved on, illumined and visibly sustained by the spiritual

soul of which it was the complete and harmonious embodiment. Of this

procession we have still in the frieze of the Parthenon a marble

transcript. There we may see the life of ancient Athens moving in stone,

from the first mounting of their horses by isolated youths, like the

slow and dropping prelude of a symphony, on to the thronged and

trampling ranks of cavalry, past the antique chariots reminiscent of

Homeric war, and the marching band of flutes and zithers, by lines of

men and maidens bearing sacrificial urns, by the garlanded sheep and

oxen destined for sacrifice, to where, on turning the corner that leads

to the eastern front, we find ourselves in the presence of the Olympian

gods themselves, enthroned to receive the offering of a people's life.

And if to this marble representation we add the colour it lacks, the

gold and silver of the vessels, the purple and saffron robes; if we set

the music playing and bid the oxen low; if we gird our living picture

with the blaze of an August noon and crown it with the Acropolis of

Athens, we may form a conception, better perhaps than could otherwise be

obtained, of what religion really meant to the citizen of a state whose

activities were thus habitually symbolised in the cult of its patron

deity. Religion to him, clearly, could hardly be a thing apart, dwelling

in the internal region of the soul and leaving outside, untouched by the

light of the ideal, the whole business and complexity of the material

side of life; to him it was the vividly present and active soul of his

corporate existence, representing in the symbolic forms of ritual the

actual facts of his experience. What he re-enacted periodically, in

ordered ceremony, was but the drama of his daily life; so that, as we

said before, the state in one of its aspects was a church, and every

layman from one point of view a priest.

The question, "What did a belief in the gods really mean to the Greek"

has now received at least some sort of answer. It meant, to recur to our

old phrase, that he was made at home in the world. In place of the

unintelligible powers of nature, he was surrounded by a company of

beings like himself; and these beings who controlled the physical world

were also the creators of human society. From them were descended the

Heroes who founded families and states; and under their guidance and

protection cities prospered and throve. Their histories were recounted

in innumerable myths, and these again were embodied in ritual. The whole

life of man, in its relations both to nature and to society, was

conceived as derived from and dependent upon his gods; and this

dependence was expressed and brought vividly home to him in a series of

religious festivals. Belief in the gods was not to him so much an

intellectual conviction, as a spiritual atmosphere in which he moved;

and to think it away would be to think away the whole structure of Greek

civilisation.

The Greek View of Life · 第 5 / 19 章