Mr. William MacLeay has with great truth observed: "The true

criterion of animal as well as vegetable perfection is the ability

to continue the species[69];" and in their progress to this state

certain changes take place in the parts and organs of _all_ animals

and vegetables: there is, therefore, an analogy in this respect

between them; and this analogy also furnishes another argument

against Dr. Herold's hypothesis, as we shall presently see. These

changes are of three kinds: In the vegetable kingdom, at least in

the phænogamous classes, there is a succession of developments

terminating in the appearance of the generative organs, inclosed

in the flower; in this kind the integuments, or most of them,

are usually _persistent_. In insects and other annulose and some

vertebrate animals, there is a succession of spoliations, or

simultaneous changes of the whole integument, till the animal appears

in its perfect form with powers of reproduction; in this kind the

integuments are _caducous_.--In man and most of the vertebrate

animals there is a gradual action of the vital forces in different

organs till they are fitted for reproduction; accompanied, as

progress is made to the adult state, by the acquisition of certain

organs, &c. as of teeth, horns, pubes, feathers, &c.[70] Let us

now consider a little in detail the analogies that appear to exist

between the second and the first and third kinds. I shall first

consider the latter as the least obvious. That able, judicious, and

learned physiologist, Dr. Virey, has pointed out no inconsiderable

resemblance between the metamorphosis of the insect, and the changes,

which he denominates a metamorphosis by metastasis, to which most

vertebrate animals are subject. In them, he observes, a state

analogous to the _larva_ state begins at the exclusion of the fœtus

from the womb; it is deprived of teeth, and its viscera are only

accommodated to milk: in the cornute species the horns are in embryo:

the digestive system now preponderates, and the great enjoyment is

_eating_. A second state, in a degree analogous to that of _pupa_,

commences at the period of dentition--the teeth now produce another

modification in the intestinal canal, which becomes capable of

receiving and digesting solid food: during this period the vital

forces are all tending to produce the perfect state of the animal;

and in this state, in man especially, the individual is _educated_

and fitted to discharge the duties of active life. Again, analogous

to the _imago_ state is the age of puberty, in which the complete

development of the sexual powers takes place in both sexes, and the

animal has arrived at its acme, and can continue its kind[71]: now

the digestive powers diminish in their activity, and love reigns

paramount. When this state is fully attained, no further or higher

change is to be expected, and the progress is soon towards decay and

the termination of the animal's mortal career. So we see that in fact

man and other _mammalia_, though they do not simultaneously cast

their skins like the insect; or pass into a state of intermediate

repose, before they attain the perfection of their nature, like the

caterpillar; have their three _states_, in each of which they acquire

new parts, powers, and appetites.

But a more striking analogy has been traced between the insects

that undergo a complete metamorphosis and the _vegetable_ kingdom;

for though the _primary_ analogy seems to be between the _Polypus_

and the _Plant_, yet the _secondary_ one with the _Insect_ is not

by any means remote. There are circumstances to which I shall have

occasion hereafter to call your attention, which afford some ground

for supposing, that the substance of the insect and the vegetable

partakes of the same nature, at least approximates more nearly, than

that of the insect and the vertebrate animal; and every one who

has observed these little creatures with any attention, will have

observed amongst them forms and organs borrowed as it were from the

kingdom of Flora; and _vice versâ_ the Botanist, if he makes the

comparison, will find amongst his favourite tribes many striking

resemblances of certain insects. But the analogy does not stop here;

for the butterfly and the plant appear to have been created with

a particular reference to each other, both in the epoch of their

appearance and the changes that take place in them. Thus, as Dr.

Virey has observed, the caterpillar is simultaneous with the leaf

of the tree or plant on which it feeds, and the butterfly with the

flowers of which it imbibes the nectar[72]. Swammerdam, I believe,

was the first who noticed the analogy between the _changes_ of

the insect and the vegetable, and has given a table in which he

has contrasted their developments, including other animals that

undergo a metamorphosis[73]: an idea which has been generalized

by Bonnet[74], and adopted and enlarged by Dr. Virey[74]. A state

analogous to that of the _larva_ in the insect begins in the plant

when it is disclosed from the seed, or springs from its hybernaculum

in the bulb, &c., or is evolved from the gemma; integument after

integument, often in various forms, as cotyledon, radical, cauline,

or floral leaves, expands as the stem rises, all which envelopes

incase the true representative of the plant, the fructification, as

the various skins do the future butterfly. When these integuments

are all expanded, the fructification appears inclosed by the calyx

or corolla as the case may be, in which the generative organs are

matured for their office--this is the bud, which is clearly analogous

to the _pupa_ state of the insect. Next the calyx and corolla expand,

the impregnation of the germen takes place, and the seed being

ripened, and dispersed by the opening of the seed-vessel or ovary of

the plant, the individual dies: thus the _imago_ state of the insect

has its representative in the plant. "If we place," says Dr. Virey,

"here the egg of the insect, next its caterpillar, a little further

the chrysalis, and lastly the butterfly--what is this but an animal

stem--an elongation perfectly similar to that of the plant issuing

from the seed to attain its blossoming and propagation?"[75]

There being, therefore, this general analogy in their progress to

that state in which they can continue their species between every

part of animated nature, it holds good, I think, that the same

analogy should take place in their developments. If the adult man

or quadruped, &c. is evidently an evolution of the fœtus, as from

microscopical observations it appears that they are[76], if the

teeth, horns, and other parts, &c. to be acquired in his progress to

that state are already in him in their embryos, we may also conclude

that the butterfly and its organs, &c. are all in the newly-hatched

caterpillar. Again, if the blossom and its envelopes are contained

in the gemma, the bulb, &c. where they have been discovered[77],

it follows analogically that the butterfly and its integuments all

preexist in its forerunner.

Perhaps after this view of the objections to Dr. Herold's hypothesis,

it will not be necessary to say much with regard to the argument

he draws from the change of organs--the loss of some and the

acquisition of others--since this may readily be conceived to be the

natural consequence of the vital forces tending more and more to the

formation of the butterfly, and the withdrawing of their action more

and more from the caterpillar; I shall not, therefore, enter further

into the question, especially since the change of organs will come

more regularly under our notice upon a future occasion.

Winged insects, many branchiopod _Crustacea_, and the Batracian

reptiles, have been observed by Dr. Virey to bear some analogy to the

_mammalia_, _aves_, &c. in another respect. In leaving their egg,

they only quit their first integument, answering to the _chorion_ or

external envelope of the human fœtus; they therefore still continue

a kind of fœtus, so to speak, more or less enveloped under other

tunics, and principally in their _amnios_, or the covering in which

the fœtus floats in the _liquor amnii_[78]. This the butterfly does

in the pupa case; and its birth from this, under this view, will be

the true birth of the animal. In the human subject, the ova upon

impregnation are said to pass from the ovary through the Fallopian

tube into the uterus. In the insect world, upon impregnation, the

eggs pass first from the ovaries into the oviduct, answering to the

Fallopian tube, which in them terminates in the _ovipositor_, or

the instrument by which the parent animal conveys the eggs to their

proper station: there is, therefore, nothing properly analogous to

the uterus in the insect, and the substance upon which the larva

feeds upon exclusion answers the purpose of a placenta.

After this general view of the most modern theories with regard to

the _metamorphosis_ of insects, I shall in the present and some

following letters, treat separately of the different states through

which these little beings successively pass.

* * * * *

The first of these is the _Egg state_, the whole class of insects

being strictly oviparous. Some few tribes indeed bring into the

world living young ones, and have on that account been considered

as _viviparous_, but incorrectly, for the embryos of none of these

are nourished, as in the true viviparous animals, within a uterus

by means of a placenta, but receive their development within true

eggs which are hatched in the body of the mother. This is proved

by the observations of Leeuwenhoek, who found eggs in the abdomen

of a female scorpion[79]; and of Reaumur, with regard to the

flesh-fly (_Musca carnaria_) and other viviparous flies as they

have been called[80]. A similar mode of production takes place in

vipers and some other reptiles, which have hence been denominated

_ovo-viviparous_, to distinguish them from the true viviparous

animals--the class _Mammalia_. By far the larger portion of

insects is oviparous in the ordinary acceptation of the term. The

ovo-viviparous tribes at present known are scorpions; the flesh-fly

and several other flies; a minute gnat belonging to Latreille's

family of _Tipulariæ_[81]; some species of _Coccus_; some bugs

(_Cimicidæ_)[82]; and most _Aphides_, which last also exhibit the

singular fact of individuals of the same species being some oviparous

and others ovo-viviparous, the former being longer in proportion than

the latter.--Bonnet, however, is of opinion that the eggs of the

first are not perfect eggs, but a kind of cocoon, which defends the

larva, already formed in some degree, from the cold of winter[83].

When excluded from the body of the mother, or from the egg, as has

been before observed, some insects appear nearly in the form of

their parents, which, with a very slight alteration, they always

retain; others, and the greater number, assume an appearance totally

different from that of their parents, which they acquire only after

passing through various changes. It is to these last, which have

chiefly engaged the attention of Entomologists, that the title of

metamorphoses has been often restricted. As, however, those insects

which undergo the slightest change of form, as spiders do, undergo

_some_ change, and almost all insects cast their skins several

times[84] before they attain maturity, Linné and most Entomologists,

till very recently, have regarded the whole class as undergoing

metamorphoses, and as passing through _four_ different states, viz.

the Egg--the Larva--the Pupa--and the Imago.

It is obvious, however, that in ovo-viviparous species _three_ states

of their existence only come under our cognizance, as these, being

hatched in the body of the mother, come forth first under the form of

larvæ. There is even one tribe of insects which presents the strange

anomaly of being born in the _pupa_ state. This is the Linnean

genus _Hippobosca_ (_Pupipara_ fam. Latr.), to which our forest-fly

belongs, the females of which lay bodies so much resembling eggs,

that they were long considered as such until their true nature was

ascertained by Reaumur (most of whose observations were confirmed

by De Geer), who, from their size, which nearly equals that of

the parent fly--from their slight motion when first extruded--from

spiraculiform points which run down each side of them--and lastly,

from their producing not a larva, as all other insects' eggs do,

but perfect flies in the winged state--inferred, and doubtless with

reason, that they are not real eggs, but pupæ, or larvæ just ready

to assume the pupa state, which, however strange it may seem, have

passed the egg and larva states in the body of the mother[85].

Insects, therefore, as to their mode of birth, may be divided into--

I. _Ovo-viviparous_, subdivided into--

1. _Larviparous_, coming forth from the matrix of the mother in

the state of larvæ, as the Scorpion (_Scorpio_), the Flesh-fly

(_Musca_), the Plant-louse (_Aphis_), &c.

2. _Pupiparous_, continuing in the matrix of the mother during

the larva state, and coming forth in that of _pupa_, as the

Forest-fly (_Hippobosca equina_), the Sheep-louse (_Melophagus

ovinus_), the Bat-louse (_Nycteribia Vespertilionis_), &c.

II. _Oviparous_. All other insects.

Our business for the remainder of this letter will be with the latter

description of these little animals.

The unerring foresight with which the female deposits her eggs

in the precise place where the larvæ, when excluded, are sure to

find suitable food; and the singular instruments with which, for

this purpose, the extremity of their abdomen is furnished, have

been noticed in a former letter[86], and those last mentioned will

be adverted to in a future one. I shall now, therefore, confine

myself to other circumstances connected with the subject, arranged

for the sake of order under several distinct heads, as--their

_exclusion_--_situation_--_substance_--_number_--_size_--_figure_--

_colour_--and _period of hatching_.

i. _Exclusion._ The exclusion or extrusion of the impregnated eggs

takes place, when, passing from the ovary into the oviduct, they are

conducted by means of the ovipositor, in which it terminates, to

their proper situation. By far the greater number of insects extrude

them _singly_, a longer interval elapsing between the passage of each

egg in some than in others. In those tribes which place their eggs

in groups, such as most butterflies and moths, and many beetles,

they pass from the ovaries usually with great rapidity; while in the

_Ichneumonidæ_, _Sphegidæ_, _Œstri_, and other parasitic genera,

which usually deposit their eggs singly, an interval of some minutes,

hours, or perhaps even days, intervenes between the extrusion of

each egg. One remarkable instance of the former mode I noticed in

my letter on the _Perfect Societies_ of Insects[87]; another may

be cited, to which you may yourself be a witness--I allude to that

common moth, vulgarly called the _Ghost (Hepialus Humuli)_, which

lays a large number of minute black eggs, resembling grains of

gunpowder, and ejects them so fast that, according to De Geer, they

may be said to _run_ from the oviduct, and are sometimes expelled

with the force of a popgun[88]. A Tetrapterous insect, the genus of

which is uncertain, is said, when it is taken, to discharge its eggs

like shot from a gun[89]. And a friend of mine, who had observed with

attention the proceedings of a common crane-fly (_Tipula_), assured

me that several females which he caught projected their eggs to the

distance of more than ten inches.

A few _Diptera_ extrude them in a sort of chain or necklace, each

egg being connected by a glutinous matter with that which precedes

and follows it. In a small species of a genus allied to _Psychoda_

(a kind of midge), which one season was abundant in a window of my

house, this necklace is composed of eggs joined by their sides, not

unlike those strung by children of the seeds of the mallow[90]. Other

_Tipulidæ_ on the contrary extrude their eggs joined end to end,

so as to resemble a necklace of oval beads. _Beris clavipes_ and

_Sciura Thomæ_, two other flies, produce a chain about an inch long,

consisting of oval eggs connected, in an oblique position, side by

side; an arrangement very similar prevails in the ribband of eggs

which drop from some of the _Ephemeræ_[91].

These eggs, like those of the insects first mentioned, though

connected, are expelled in succession; but other tribes, as the

_Libellulidæ_, with the exception of _Agrion_, many _Ephemeræ_,

_Trichopterous_ insects, &c. expel the whole at once, as it were

in a mass. In those first mentioned they are gummed together in an

oblong cluster[92]. In one _Ephemera_ mentioned by Reaumur[93], they

formed two oblong masses, each containing from three to four hundred

eggs, and three and a half or four lines long. These animals as soon

as their wings are developed eject these masses by two orifices,

and are aided in the process by two vesicles full of air, wherever

they happen to alight or to fall; in most instances it is the water,

their proper element, that receives them, but the animal does not

appear to know the difference between a solid and a liquid, and

seems only anxious how to free herself from a burthen that oppresses

her; all has been contrived that an insect so short-lived may finish

her different operations with the utmost celerity: the term of her

existence would not have admitted the leisurely extrusion of such a

number of eggs in succession[94]. Some _Trichoptera_, or May-flies,

as _Phryganea grandis_ L., exclude their eggs in a double packet,

enveloped in a mass of jelly, (a circumstance often attending the

eggs that produce aquatic larvæ,) upon the leaves of willows[95].

A similar double packet in the year 1810 I observed appended to

the anus of a black species with long antennæ, probably _Phryganea

atrata_ F.[96] Upon taking several of the females I was surprised to

find in the above situation a seemingly fleshy substance of a dirty

yellow. At first, from its annular appearance, I conceived it to be

some parasitic larva, but was not a little surprised upon pulling

it away that it was full of globular transparent dusky eggs: it was

about two lines and a quarter in length and nearly one in breadth.

Being bent double it was attached to the animal by the intermediate

angle, and when unfolded was constricted in the middle[97]. Each

half, which was roundish, had about ten sharp transverse ridges, the

interstices of which appeared as if crenated, an appearance produced

by the eggs which it contained. Upon more than gentle pressure it

burst and let out the eggs. Though resembling the packet of _P.

grandis_ in shape and other circumstances, it was nothing like

jelly, but had rather a waxy appearance, and seems to have been

covered by a membrane: so that the excluded larvæ must probably have

eaten their way out of it. I have still by me, in 1822, specimens of

these egg-packets, which, after the lapse of so many years, retain

their original form and colour. It is not improbable that other

species extrude their eggs in a similar case. Scopoli says of _P.

bicaudata_ L., that the female carries about under her belly her eggs

united into a globe, like _Lycosa saccata_[98]. The eggs of _Geometra

Potamogata_ F. are also enveloped in a gelatinous substance, and the

mass is covered with leaves[99].

Insects of the _Diptera_ order also, like frogs and toads, commit

their eggs to the water imbedded in masses of jelly. Dr. Derham

describes two different kinds of them, in one of which the eggs were

laid in parallel rows end to end, and in another in a single row,

in which the sides were parallel[100]. But the most remarkable and

beautiful specimen of this kind that I ever saw was one that, many

years ago, I took out of a pond at Wittersham in Kent, from which I

requested a young lady to make the drawing I send you[101]. The mass

of jelly, about an inch and a quarter long, and rather widest in the

middle, was attached by one end to some aquatic grass, and from one

end to the other ran a spiral thread of very minute eggs, the turns

of the screw being alternately on each side.

The mode of exclusion of the eggs of the _Blattæ_, which are engaged

for a whole week in the business of oviposition, is very singular:

the female deposits one or two large suboviform capsules, as large as

half their abdomen, rounded on one side, and on the other straight

and serrated, which at first is white and soft, but soon becomes

brown and hard. This egg-case, as it may be called, contains sixteen

or eighteen eggs arranged in a double series, and the cock-roaches

when hatched make their escape through a cleft in its straight

side, which shuts so accurately when they have quitted it, that at

first it appears as entire as before[102]. The insects of the genus

_Mantis_ also, or what are called the _praying insects_, when they

deposit their eggs, eject with them a soft substance, which hardens

in the air and forms a long kind of envelope resembling parchment,

in which the eggs are arranged also in a double series. And the

Locusts (_Gryllus Locusta_ L.) are said by Morier[103] to deposit in

the ground an oblong substance, of the shape of their abdomen, which

contains a considerable number of eggs arranged neatly in rows. The

peristaltic motion observed in the females of some insects during

oviposition has been before described[104].

ii. _Situation._ Under this head I include the situation in which the

female insect places her eggs when extruded, whether she continues her

care of them and carries them about till they hatch, or whether she

entirely deserts them, placing them either without a covering within

reach of their food, or enveloping them in hair or otherwise protecting

them from accident or the attack of enemies. I shall consider them

under two views: _first_, as depositing their eggs in _groups_, whether

covered or naked; and _secondly_, as depositing them _singly_.

1. Those that deposit their eggs in _groups_ are first to be

considered. I shall begin with those that protect them with some kind

of _covering_.

I have already mentioned in a former letter[105] the silken bag with

which _Lycosa saccata_ Latr., a kind of spider, surrounds her eggs, and

in which she constantly carries them about with her, defending them to

the last extremity. Many other spiders, indeed nearly the whole tribe,

fabricate similar pouches, but of various sizes, forms, texture, and

colours. Some are scarcely so big as a pea, others of the size of a

large gooseberry; some globular, some bell-shaped; others, the genus

_Thomisus_ Walck. in particular, depressed like a lupine; some of a

close texture like silk; others of a looser fabric resembling wool:

some consisting of a single pellicle, but most of a double, of which

the interior is finer and softer[106]; some white; others inclining

to blue; others again yellow or reddish; most of them are of a whole

colour, but that of _Epeira fasciata_ is gray varied with black[107].

And while the parent spider of some kinds (the _Lupi_) always carries

her egg-bag attached to her anus, others hold them by their palpi and

maxillæ; and others suspend them by a long thread, or simply fasten

them in different situations, either constantly remaining near them

(the _Telariæ_), or wholly deserting them (the _Retiariæ_). The eggs of

one of these last Lister describes as often fixed in a very singular

situation--the cavity at the end of a ripe cherry; and thus, as he

expresses it--"_Stomachi maxime delicatuli quoties hanc innocuam buccam

non minus ignoranter quam avide devorarunt_[108]."

Herman informs us, that the species of the genus _Chelifer_ carry

their eggs in a mass under their belly[109].

Madam Merian gives an account of two species of _Blatta_, which

she affirms carry an egg-pouch about with them--one species (_B.

gigantea?_) she describes as carrying its eggs in a globular pouch of

web like certain spiders, and the other in a brown bag, which, when

alarmed, it drops and makes off[110]. But this admirable paintress of

natural objects was not always correct in her statements[111]: it seems

very improbable, from the habits of those species of which we know the

history, that any of them should spin a pouch of web for their eggs.

An Introduction to Entomology: Vol. 3 or Elements of the Natural History of the Insects · 第 4 / 53 段