Get into the habit of being happy, I tell you. You can do it. Practise

saying to yourself, when you waken in the morning, "Everything is all

right," and keep on saying it. You will be surprised to find how

nearly "all right" the mere saying of it at the beginning of the day

will really make everything, after all. This is true of business as

well as of the new home. Prophets of gloom are never popular, and

ought not to be.

Then, too, a quiet cheeriness of heart makes you treat your fellow man

better; and this is important in your dealings with other human male

animals. They will make it unpleasant for you if you don't. But it is

far more important in your new home than it is out in the world of

men. That is what the new home is for--to exercise and multiply the

beauties of character and conduct.

Returning again to the view-point of business wisdom, you cannot treat

your wife too well, as a mere matter of policy--though you will never

treat her well, nor anybody else, from that low motive. I am merely

calling the attention of your commercial mind to the fact that there

are actually dollars and cents in a reputation for chivalrous bearing

in your new home.

You know yourself how you feel toward a man of whom everybody says,

"He is good to his wife." Everybody wants to help that kind of a

fellow. If he is a strong man, his community glories in his strength

and increases it by their admiration and support. If he is not a

strong man, everybody wishes that he were, and tries in a thousand

ways, which a general kindly disposition toward him suggests, to

supply his deficiencies.

And this is no jug-handled rule either. The same thing is true of the

wife. When her acquaintances declare of any woman, "She is lovely in

her home," they have placed upon her brow the crown of their ultimate

tribute and regard. It depends upon both, of course, whether these

domestic beatitudes will exist in the new home.

Undoubtedly, however, it depends upon the young man more than the

young woman. He is a _man_--and that is everything. And being a man,

he should have a large and kindly forbearance, a sort of soothing

strength and calming serenity. And to all this the rule of smile and

cheeriness is helpful, if not essential.

When I was a boy in the logging-camps, I read in some stray newspaper

an article about the influence which the pleasant countenance

exercises over groups of men. The idea was that men work willingly

under the control of a strong man who is strong enough to carry in his

daily look the suggestion of a smile. It worked splendidly. It has

never been satisfactorily explained why it is next to impossible for a

man "to be down on his luck" if he will only keep the corners of his

mouth turned up. Perhaps it is the mental effort of forcing this

mechanism of a smile which brings a really happy state of mind.

Whatever the cause, it is literally true that you cannot look blackly

on the world and your own fortunes if the lines of your face are

ascending instead of drooping. This muscular state of your countenance

is connected in some strange way with that mysterious thing called the

mind; for you will find, if you try it, that a sort of serenity of

soul comes to you, and a strong confidence that "everything will come

out right in the end." When we Americans are older we shall pay more

attention to these things.

The Japanese neglect none of these deep psychological truths in

warfare. It is said that they are taught to smile in action, and

especially when they charge. Doubtless this report is true. It has at

bottom the same reason that music in battle has. What could be more

terrifying than the approach of an enemy determined on your death, and

who looks upon your execution as so pleasant and easy a thing that he

smiles about it or who regards his own possible extinction as no

unhappy consummation?

Also it is interesting to note how a pleasant expression begets its

like. I have observed this even in Manchuria, and other parts of

China--a smile unfailingly won a return smile from children who were

watching you from the fields, whereas a frown would instantly becloud

the little face with a kindred expression of disfavor. I am spending a

good deal of time upon this item of good cheer in the new home,

because I think that as long as happiness surrounds the American

fireside all is well with the Republic.

There is no investment which yields such dividends as the society you

will find in your home. The company, the talk, the silent sympathy of

that sagacious and congenial person who is your wife yield a return in

spirit, wisdom, moral tone, and pure pleasure to be found in like

measure nowhere else on earth.

It is said that Charles James Fox, the most resourceful debater the

British Parliament has ever seen, was so fond of his home and his wife

that he would actually absent himself from Parliament for the sheer

pleasure of her presence and conversation. Lord Beaconsfield, who, we

are told, married for the mere purpose of ambition, afterward fell

deeply in love with his wife and spent every moment he could in her

society. She proved, too, to be his shrewdest counselor.

Bismarck's boundless love for his princess increased with the years;

yet she was chiefly, and perhaps only, a German "hausfrau"--an ideal

housewife. The German people particularly loved the wife of Bismarck

because of these exclusively domestic traits. Perhaps that was why he

adored her more and more as the years went by. Gladstone, who was a

very surly and irritable person, declared that his wife had made his

life "cushiony."

Of course it is taken for granted in this paper that the young

American wife is this kind of a woman--wise and gentle and

good-natured--above all things good-natured. For says the Bible, "It

is better to dwell in the wilderness than with a contentious and an

angry woman." But read what is written in the Book of the right kind

of a woman--one "in whose tongue is the law of kindness," as the

Scriptures' exquisite phraseology has it.

I don't like the tone of the common comment of the American medical

profession about the neurotic condition of our American women. Our

physicians are saying that there is not one American woman in a

hundred who is nervously normal. The profession declares that they are

excitable, irritable, peevish, and that this unfortunate state is

produced by the unnatural and absurd tension they are under all the

time.

Their so-called "social duties"; the minute and nerve-destroying

precision of their housekeeping; their unnecessary overloading of

themselves with tasks futile and fictitious; the determination to

"appear" a little better than their neighbors, and, above all, to have

their children (their _one_ or _two_ children) particularly spick and

span; the long catalogue of folly into which our high-geared, modern

civilization has led our women, and through no fault of theirs--"all

these," said an eminent neurologist, in talking of this absorbing

topic, "are impairing the agreeableness and curtailing the usefulness

of our women, and will in the end destroy our women themselves."

I hope it is not true. If it is true, we had better find the cause of

it and apply the remedy, or we are a lost people; for that nation is

doomed whose women have ceased to be vital, good-tempered, and

home-loving.

May not the too heavy early education of young girls have something to

do with this later desperation of their nerves? Is not the blood taken

from vital centers where Nature meant it to go for the upbuilding of

womanhood and forced into the brain at a period when Nature meant that

brain to be the very paradise of joyous dreams and happy imaginings?

While we may thus gain a staccato smartness, a jerky and inconsequent

brilliancy, do we not lose something of the natural woman and the

delicious heartiness, spontaneous wit and instinctive wisdom of her? I

venture no opinion here--I merely suggest the query. Why don't the

doctors begin a crusade about this? It is their business.

The keen, practical sense of women in purely business affairs has been

noted in other papers, and the causes of it. The young man who

neglects this helpfulness simply throws away wisdom. Not to counsel

with your wife on business matters that affect your mutual fortune is

sheer stupidity. Also, it is morally wrong. From the very nature of

her she is more interested than you in strengthening the walls of your

new home, in making your joint experiment in the living of life a

beautiful success. Her words are the counsel of instinct, and

therefore of Nature. And Nature is wise.

Of course there are some things you cannot tell her. If you are a

lawyer, or a doctor, you are dishonorable if you tell your wife or any

other human being any secret of client or patient. Not that she is not

to be trusted--for she is. She will carry to her grave any secret that

affects you. But the disclosures of client or patient are not _your_

secrets. If they were, she would be entitled to know them--ought to

know them. But no woman of sense will permit you to tell her any

professional confidences. Don't expect her to be helpful to you in

your profession or occupation except by counsel.

Of course there is the great and inestimable help that comes from the

mere fact that she is your wife. After all, that is the very greatest

help any woman can be to any man. The care of home, the upbringing of

children, the strengthening of a husband's character here and there,

the detection of those thousand little vices of manner and speech and

thought which develop in every man--in short, the living of a natural

woman's life--is the only method of real helpfulness of a woman to a

man. And it is a priceless helpfulness.

Particularly is this true of political life and career. A man who must

be lifted to distinction by his wife's apron-strings, does not deserve

distinction. In the end, he does not get it--the apron-strings usually

break, and they ought to break. It may be stated as a general truth

that a man is never helped by the active participation of the wife in

his political affairs.

There are notable exceptions, just as there are to every rule. But as

a generalization this statement is accurate. Men resent that kind of

thing in politics. They want a man who aspires to anything to be

worthy of that thing on his own account. They want their leader to be

a leader; and no leader is "managed" in politics by his wife. They are

right about it, too. But whether they are right or wrong, that is the

way they feel.

So the only help which a woman can be to a man in politics is just to

be a wife in all that that term implies. And what greater help than

that could there be? She who impresses the American millions with the

fact that she is the ideal wife and mother has made the strongest,

subtlest appeal to the nation. But she cannot do this by "mixing up in

politics," by trying to plan and manage her husband's campaigns, and

so forth. For the people's instinct is unerring. We Americans are a

home-making and a home-loving people; and as a people we adore the

American wife and mother--the maker and keeper of the American home.

So you attend to your politics or your business and let your wife

attend to hers; and she will be happy and glad to make your home the

exclusive scene of her activities if you will only be man enough to do

a man's full part in the world and leave no room for a woman of spirit

to see that you are not doing a man's full part, and, therefore, to

try to help you out.

I sometimes think that the propaganda that woman is the equal of man,

and that it is all right for her to take on man's work in business and

the professions, is due not so much to an abnormal development in her

character as it is to a decadence in our manhood. At least I have

always observed that the wife of a really masterful man finds her

greatest happiness in being merely his wife, and never attempts to

take any of his tasks upon her. And why should she assume his labor?

Her natural work in the world is as much harder than his as it is

nobler and finer.

Speaking of politics, I have always thought men, young and old, ought

to consult their wives and families about how they cast their ballot.

What right has any man to vote as he individually thinks best? He is

the head of the family, it is true, but he is only one of the family,

after all. This Republic is not made up of individuals; it is made up

of families. Its unit is not the boarding-house, but the home.

The Senate of the United States is the greatest forum of free debate

on earth; but the counsel of the American fireside is far more

powerful. Wife and children have a vital interest in every ballot

deposited by father and husband--an interest as definite and tangible

as his own. Every voter, therefore, ought to discuss with wife and

children, with parents, brothers, and sisters, all public questions,

and vote according to the composite family conviction.

No greater method of public safety can be imagined than for the

American family to "size up" the American public man, and then have

the voters of that family sustain or reject him at the polls,

according to the verdict of the household. If such were the rule, only

those men who are of the people when they are first placed in public

office, and who keep close to the people ever after, would be elected

to anything.

Such a method, too, would insure a steadier current of national

policy, subject to fewer variations. There would not be so many fads

to deflect sound and sane statesmanship. So by all means, young man,

begin your career as a citizen by making your wife a partner in every

vote you cast.

Nobody denies that men and women should have equality of privilege and

equality of rights; but equality of duties and similarity of work is

absurd. The contrary idea was beautifully satirized in the now famous

toast:

"Here's to our women: God bless them! Once our superiors, now our

equals."

The truth is that it is impossible to compare men and women. They are

not the same beings. They have different characteristics, different

methods, different capacities, and different view-points of life. Each

supplements the other. Doubtless the woman has the choicer lot. Surely

this is true abstractly speaking. Suppose we should all stand

disembodied souls, or rather unembodied souls, on the edge of the

forming universe; and suppose that, to these abstract intelligences,

the Creator should say:

"I am forming the universe. I am creating a wonderful place called

Earth. I am going to clothe you each in human form, marvelously and

beautifully made, the highest work of my hands. Some of you shall be

men. To these men I will give the task of labor in the fields, of

warfare with wild beasts. It shall be your duty to subdue

wildernesses, and to construct and defend a dwelling-place for this

other one whom I am going to make a woman. Therefore I shall give you

men large bones to deal strong blows, and a heavy skull to withstand

the like. I shall give you courage and physical power and audacity and

daring.

"The woman's mission shall be different. _It shall be for her to

create and preserve human happiness._ She shall do this in the

dwelling-place which the man constructs for her, and which will be

called home. There shall she bind up his wounds and give him rest and

comfort. I will give into her keeping also the making of the race, and

thus the control of the destiny of the world. And so this woman shall

be given delicate bones and a deft touch and voice of music and eye of

peace and heart of tenderness and mind of beautiful wisdom."

Does this comparison not make it clear that woman has by far a more

exalted mission than man? But the mission of both man and woman is

sufficiently grand and noble if each performs it, and within its

limitations is content.

Have plenty of friends. Cultivate them. You cultivate your business.

You cultivate vegetables. But friends are more precious than either

business or vegetables. Cultivate friends, therefore. Call on them and

let them call on you. And do it in the good old-fashioned, hearty,

American way.

But be sure you make your friends for the sake of the relation itself.

Do not misuse that sacred relation for your personal advantage. Do not

make friends for the purposes of success. Make friends for the

purposes of friendship. Be true to them, therefore. Don't neglect them

when they can no longer serve you. And serve you them. And let your

service to your friends be a glad service, a service which is its own

reward.

He who seeks another's friendship because he needs it in his politics

or business, will throw that friendship away like a worn-out glove

when his ends have been accomplished. Make friends and nourish

friendship because friends and friendships are life itself. Remember

that you do not live in order to achieve success; you achieve success

in order to live.

It is the twentieth century you are living in--don't forget that. Keep

up, therefore; keep abreast of things. Keep in the current of the

world's thought and feeling. Newspapers are literally indispensable to

you; and you should take two of them--the morning paper and the

evening paper. Get up fifteen minutes earlier in the morning, so that

you may have time to look over the morning paper carefully.

Do not read it idly. Read it with discrimination. And do not read it

without discussing it with your little family. The war in Manchuria,

the character of a public man, the policy of an administration, the

state of the Nation's business--all these are mental food which you

need as much as you need your breakfast. One thoroughly up-to-date

magazine also is helpful. Build you a library also. You do not want

the new home to be a mere physical habitation. You want it to be a

home for the mind as well as the body, do you not?

I heard of a young lawyer who put aside a little of every fee as a

sinking-fund for a library. He and his wife bought books with

that--not books for the office, but books for their home. He

succeeded--"won out"--"won out" with his cases, which was his

profession's business, and "won out" with his happiness and hers,

which was his life's business.

The theater is the highest form of combined education, amusement, and

repose which human intelligence has yet invented. It was so in Greece,

and it is so now. The theater occasionally is good for you. But let

the play you go to see be high-grade. Inferior performances on the

stage will destroy your taste as surely as will the continued

propinquity of poor pictures. The same is true of music.

Music has a mysterious quality which exalts. It has been noted that

soldiers gladly go to their death under its influence, who otherwise

would fight unwillingly. It is a great producer of thought also. Some

men can write well only under its inspiration. Educate yourself _up_

in it, therefore. Do not be content with the simple melodies and old

songs. They will never lose their charm, and ought not; but they are

not the best which music has for you.

What I am now insisting upon is a constant and careful nourishment of

the mind and soul within you, so that the new home may each day be

more and more the dwelling-place of beauty and the abode of real

happiness. You cannot think of the old home without thinking of your

mother; and you cannot think of your mother without thinking of the

Bible.

A young man and a young woman who are making a new home make an

irreparable mistake if they leave out the religious influence. Both

ought to belong to church, and to the same church. This is a matter of

prudence as well as of righteousness; for get it into your

consciousness that you must be in harmony with the people of whom you

two are one. Your new home must be in accord with the millions of

other homes which make up this Nation; and the American people at

bottom are a religious people.

Also, you will find that nothing will please your wife so much as to

resolve upon regular church attendance, and then to reduce that

resolve to a habit. It is good for you, too; you feel as though you

had taken a moral bath after you get home from service every Sunday.

Of course, being an American and a gentleman, you will have the

American gentleman's conception of all womanhood, and his adoring

reverence for the one woman who has blessed him with her life's

companionship. You will cherish her, therefore, in that way which none

but the American gentleman quite understands. You will be gentle with

her, and watchful of her health and happiness.

You will be ever brave and kind, wise and strong, deserving that

respect which she is so anxious to accord you; earning that devotion

which by the very nature of her being she must bestow on you; winning

that admiration which it is the crowning pride of her life to yield

to you; and, finally, receiving that care which only her hands can

give, and a life-long joy which, increasing with the years, is fullest

and most perfect when both your heads are white and your mutual steps

no longer wander from the threshold of that "new home" which you built

in the beginning of your lives, and which is now the "old home" to

your children, who beneath its roof "rise up and call you blessed."

V

THE YOUNG LAWYER AND HIS BEGINNINGS

It used to be a part of the creed of a certain denomination that a man

should not be admitted to the ministry who had not received his

"call." It was necessary that he should hear the Voice speaking with

his tongue, and saying, "Woe is unto me, if I preach not the Gospel."

This is true of the profession of law. So, at the beginning of your

beginnings, do not begin at all unless you see a certainty of misery

if you do not. Unless you are convinced that you would rather work,

toil, nay, slave for years to secure recognition in the law, than to

be honored and enriched in some other occupation, do not enter this

profession of supreme ardor.

And above all things, do not enter it if you expect to practise law

principally for the purpose of making money. It is not a money-making

profession. The same effort, acumen, and enthusiasm expended in almost

any other occupation will bring you financial returns tremendously

out of proportion to your most successful compensation in the law,

measured by mere money. The money-making conception of our profession

is not only erroneous, but ruinous; for you must remember, to begin

with, that you are practising the science of justice.

If possible, get a thorough college education before you touch a law

book. If you can get a college education, do not "read law" while you

are at college. If you go to college, do not take what is known as the

"scientific" course, or "physical" course. Take the classical course.

Next to geometry and logarithms and the Bible, the best discipline

preparatory to making you a lawyer is the translation of Latin. Latin

is the most logical language the world has ever seen, or is likely

ever to see.

After you get your college course, then go to a thoroughly first-class

law school. After this, spend two or three years in active work in the

office of some successful lawyer who has lots of practise, and who

will load off on your shoulders as much work as possible.

If you cannot go to a law school, your training in the law office will

do you nearly as well. You can get along without your law school, but

you can never get along without your training in the law office. The

way to learn to swim is to swim.

But if you cannot get a college education, do not get discouraged. It

is possible that you are an Abraham Lincoln, or a John Marshall, or

some person like that; and if you are you will succeed anyhow. Even if

you are not so highly gifted you can win in the law without a college

education if you are naturally a lawyer _and will work hard enough_.

If you have to choose between a law school and a college education,

take the latter. But the training afforded by a clerkship in an active

lawyer's office is more helpful than either.

If you can be so fortunate as to get the firm or attorney with whom

you are studying to let you draft pleadings, take depositions, examine

witnesses, make arguments to court and jury, get out transcripts for

appeal, write briefs, petitions, motions, and all the rest of that

careful and painstaking work which makes the daily life of the lawyer,

you will equip yourself for actual practise better than in any other

way I know of.

The firm will gladly let you do this work if you show yourself

competent. But this does not mean that you are merely to sit around

the office and say "bright things." There is nothing in "bright

things"--there is everything in good judgment and downright hard work.

The Young Man and the World · 第 8 / 19 段