COMBINATIONS AND AGGREGATIONS.

A given association of mechanical elements may be entirely new, but it

does not follow that it forms a patentable association, for not all

new things are patentable. If the new association is a combination, it

is patentable, but if it is a mere aggregation, it is unpatentable. An

association may be new and still all of its separate elements may be

old, the act of invention lying in the fact that the elements have

been so associated with relation to each other as to bring about an

improved result, or an improved means for an old result. All new

machines are, after all, composed of old elements. The law presupposes

that the elements are old, and that the invention resides in the

peculiar association of them. If we take a given mechanical element,

recognized as having had a certain capacity, and if we then similarly

take some other mechanical element and employ it only for its

previously recognized capacity, and if we then add the third element

for its recognized capacity, we have in the end only an association of

three elements each performing its well recognized individual office,

and the entire association performing only the sum of the recognized

individual elements. Such an association is a mere aggregation, a mere

adding together of elements, without making the sum of the results any

greater in the association than it was in the individual elements. It

is simply adding two to one and getting three as a result. An

aggregation is unpatentable. As an illustration, a heavy marble statue

of Jupiter is found in the parlor and difficult to move. Ordinary

casters are put under its pedestal and it becomes easier to move.

Modern anti-friction two-wheeled casters are substituted for the

commoner casters, and the statue becomes still easier to move. Casters

were never before associated with a statue of Jupiter. Here is a new

association, but it is a mere aggregation. The statue of Jupiter has

been unmodified by the presence of the casters, and the casters

perform precisely the same under the statue of Jupiter that they did

under the bedstead. There is no combined result, and there is no

patentable combination.

But if an inventor takes a given mechanical element for the purpose of

its well recognized capacity, and then associates with it another

mechanical element for its recognized capacity, but so associates the

two elements that one has a modifying effect upon the capacity of the

other element, then the association will be capable of a result

greater than the sum of the results for the individual elements. This

excessive result is not due to the individual elements, but to the

combination of them. One has been added to one and a sum greater than

two has been secured. The modification of result may be due merely to

the bringing of the two elements together, so that they may mutually

act upon each other, or it may be due to the manner or means by which

they are joined. In a patentable combination the separate elements

mutually act upon each other to effect a modification of their

previous individual results, and secure a conjoint result greater than

the sum of the individual results. The elements of a combination need

not act simultaneously; they may act successively, or some may act

without motion. As an illustration, assume an old watch in which there

was a stem for setting the hands, and assume another old watch with a

stem for winding the spring. If an inventor should make a watch, and

provide it with the two stems, he would have only an aggregation. But

if he employed but one stem, and so located it that it could be used

at will for setting the hands or for winding the spring, then he would

have produced a combination. The particular instance just given is not

a case of the same number of elements, producing a result in excess of

the individual results of the separate elements, but is rather a case

of a lesser number of elements, producing a combination result equal

to the sum of the previous results of a greater number of elements. A

better example would perhaps be a new watch with its two old stems so

related that either could be used for setting the hands or for winding

the spring.

Scientific American Supplement, No. 1178, June 25, 1898 · 第 23 / 43 题