Lloyd George had made up his mind about the statesmen in the House and

had come to a decision that not even the strongest of them was

unassailable. Gladstone led the Government and Lloyd George was his

nominal follower, but on individual matters the young M. P. opposed his

chief. It was rather like a fox-terrier standing up to a lion.

Gladstone had an incomparable prestige, the result of a continuous

half-century of work for his country, including four periods as Prime

Minister. Probably three-quarters of the six hundred and seventy

members of the House of Commons, many of them old politicians, would

have been nervous about tackling Gladstone, who, despite his eighty

years, was still a terrific force in debate, possessing an eagle mien

which subdued opponent and recalcitrant supporters alike. Young Lloyd

George refused to be cowed even by Gladstone.

Wales was pressing for the disestablishment of the English Church

within its borders, and Lloyd George with two or three other Liberal

members bitterly protested about the postponement of this reform.

Difficulties of immediate parliamentary action, the urgency of other

legislation, the opposition from powerful sections of the House, all

these things were nothing to Lloyd George; what he wanted was the

disestablishment of the Church in Wales. Frequently the Prime Minister

in the British Parliament ignores the attacks of the lesser men.

Gladstone could not ignore Lloyd George. He had to answer him.

Sometimes he condescended to berate him, much to the enjoyment of the

assembly. Lloyd George always came up unhurt, alert, and persistent.

In 1892 Mr. Gladstone retired, and his place at the head of the Liberal

Government was taken by Lord Rosebery. Lloyd George, in his efforts to

secure the early passage of the Welsh disestablishment bill, continued

to strike hard at his nominal chief until in 1894 came the end of this

particular sphere of his operations, for the Liberal Government was

turned out and a Conservative Government put in its place. This,

however, was Lloyd George's real opportunity. Independent as he had

been in the ranks of his own party, he now found far greater scope as a

foe in opposition to Ministers in power. He went for them, tooth and

nail, making a dead set at Chamberlain, who had taken Gladstone's place

as the leading figure in the House of Commons. Chamberlain himself had

fought his way up. Those who have seen Chamberlain will never forget

him--the long, strong face, the steady, hard eyes, the straight-cut

mouth, the rigidly erect, slim body, the unfailing single eyeglass, and

the orchid in his buttonhole making a picture which can never be

disassociated from will-power, a mind cold and clear, a lucid gift of

speech, unflinching courage, and a savage contempt for weakness or

inefficiency. He had against him in the House of Commons some able

critics, but not more than two or three could really stand up to him in

argument. I believe there was not a single one even of these who dared

to take off the gloves to him in real fighting earnest. Lloyd George

went into opposition with his eyes fixed on Chamberlain.

From that time onward Lloyd George deliberately fought the Birmingham

statesman on every possible opportunity. In committee, during question

time, at set debate, he pursued him unremittingly. Chamberlain tried

at first to shake him off with a scornful word or two. But Lloyd

George was not to be dismissed as so many others had been. He returned

to the attack like a hornet. He was never appeased, never in doubt,

never content. Chamberlain had presently to take real notice of him.

He turned on the Welshman and with ferocity held him up to scorn and

ridicule--not a difficult task for such a man as Chamberlain,

especially as the majority of the House of Commons were his followers.

Lloyd George certainly had his bad times then. Sometimes his facts

would be proved awry and his arguments fallacious and he would be

harried with merciless sarcasm. He would, in effect, be smashed to

pieces. To the amazement of every one he refused to understand that he

was smashed. After any and every attack he would be swiftly on his

feet, hurling forth fresh accusatory words and ignoring the punishment

he had just received--would be himself the scourger of sin. Sometimes

he even took to imitating Chamberlain's own methods, and pointing a

finger at his distinguished victim, would hiss out his charges word by

word with a vibrant slowness. Even the impassive Chamberlain used

sometimes to color a little under this mimicry. If ever a man went

thoroughly out of his way to be hated it was Lloyd George. But he

gained way. Once under an unsparing attack by Lloyd George,

Chamberlain winced, leaped to his feet, and asked permission to make a

second speech in reply. That was the first occasion which caused

members to say among themselves that Chamberlain, gladiator that he

was, had met his match in Lloyd George.

IV

THE DAREDEVIL STATESMAN

What was the underlying motive in Lloyd George during those years of

feverish combat? Why should he have gone out of his way to deal injury

and to incur enmity? Why was he always in the pose of rebel even when

his friends were in power? Was he anything more than a clever young

politician seeking notoriety by espousing unpopular courses whenever

there was a chance to strike a blow at those high in authority? They

are justifiable questions, and they can be answered quite shortly.

Heaven had given Lloyd George, together with much impulsiveness, the

most sensitive of souls and a kindly heart, together with the

imagination of a poet. Even when he was a boy resentment blazed from

him as he realized the injustices which were suffered by the poorer

people, people who could not raise their voice to protest and who went

on in stolid resignation from childhood to the grave. The example of

his mother, a patient and noble woman, struggling with fate for the

sake of her children, was ever before him. He saw his uncle, a sturdy

Puritan of high character and intelligence, looked down upon, or at

least disapproved of, because of his religious and political opinions,

and this in spite of the fact that Richard Lloyd's beliefs sprang from

selfless emotions and held him in an upright life. As Lloyd George

grew older and mingled with the world he saw how oppression, active or

passive, often went with wealth and power, and that not only material

sustenance, but education and even the right to think, was denied the

vast preponderance of the population by those who through inheritance,

accident, or hardihood had secured the good things of the earth. Every

nerve within him quivered in revolt. And even before he realized the

full extent of the powers that lay within him his ardent spirit was

leaping forward to fight what he regarded as the great giants of

evil--the systems and the customs which gave individuals the power to

hold down those who could not help themselves. He loved his native

land passionately and was saturated with religious feeling, and he was

strung with indignation that the state Church system of England should

continue to be forced upon a nation of Nonconformists, with its

resulting social influence on the people of his land. He was stirred

to the depths by the lives of poor people among whom he had lived his

most impressionable years. Enraged at the mental and moral attitude of

the rich Conservatives who placidly assumed that Providence meant them

to rule the earth and all the lesser horde to bow down to their

inspired will, he was dissatisfied with the stolidity and lethargy of

the official Liberal party, although he himself was a Liberal. When

the Boer War broke out his sense of chivalry and justice was outraged

at the thought that a great people like the British nation should

attempt to crush a tiny pastoral race, even under some provocation.

Thus from the start he devoted himself passionately and whole-heartedly

to the side of the under dog.

Incidentally in this single-handed fight he took a sardonic delight in

shocking those pillars of society who to him were symbols of the

existing order of things. Fiercely he smashed away at idols, however

highly placed, however much revered. At all times and in all

circumstances he was regardless of consequences to himself, a fact

which, together with his gifts, secured for him a certain measure of

concealed respect even from those who hated him most. Withal,

throughout these years of destructiveness his mind was working toward

the formation of a new order of things. Behind and beyond all his

Ishmaelitish tactics there were thoughts of a reconstruction. He may

have been right or wrong in his courses. At any rate, it is necessary

in a sketch of his career to set out the connecting links in years of

activity which to a casual observer may seem disjointed, variable, and

erratic.

A notable incident in his career was when, with practically the whole

country inflamed against him, owing to his attitude on the Boer War, he

decided to go down to Birmingham, the seat and stronghold of Joseph

Chamberlain, and address a public meeting in support of his anti-war

policy. Friends tried to dissuade him. He was not to be dissuaded.

Preparations were quickly set afoot in Birmingham to break up his

meeting. When the evening arrived so great were the hostile crowds

around the town hall, so high their temper, that the chief constable of

the city begged Lloyd George not to risk himself on the platform.

Lloyd George would have none of his suggestion. He went to the hall,

and his appearance was a signal for a riot such as had been unknown for

a generation at a public gathering in Britain. In a frantic fight by

the Chamberlain supporters to reach the platform the sympathizers with

Lloyd George were trampled down. Furniture was broken up, windows were

smashed, several people were seriously injured, and one man was killed.

Lloyd George was smuggled out of the hall in a policeman's uniform.

England rang with the story of the happenings on that night in

Birmingham. Lloyd George was called a coward and sneered at for

allowing himself to get away in disguise, and if poisonous words could

have checked a man's career he would have been finished from that time.

A few days after the riot an M. P. met Joseph Chamberlain in the lobby

of the House of Commons and said to him, "So your people didn't manage

to kill Lloyd George the other night?" "What is everybody's business

is nobody's business," said Chamberlain as he passed on.

It is a tribute to Lloyd George's power among his own people in Wales

that when an election took place in the middle of the war he retained

his seat in Parliament. You get a touch of the kind of man in the

words he spoke to his supporters in the course of his speech after the

declaration of the poll. "While England and Scotland are drunk with

blood, the brain of Wales remains clear, and she advances with steady

step on the road to progress and liberty."

The Conservatives remained in power to the end of 1905, and in the

beginning of 1906 there was a general election which returned to power

a strong Liberal majority augmented by some thirty Labor members. A

vigorous spirit was sweeping through the Liberal ranks. New men had

sprung to the front to take the place of those who had dropped out by

death, old age, or the feeling that modern thought was too advanced for

them. Sir Henry Campbell-Bannerman, a pawky old Scotsman who became

the Liberal Prime Minister, did not confine the members of his Cabinet

to the respectable leaders of old time, but brought in new blood, among

his selections being Lloyd George. This promotion was unexpected by

the public. Lloyd George had made a big reputation in Parliament, but

it was always that of the free-lance. On vital questions of principle

he was as free from control by the Liberals as by the Conservatives.

He was known as an untamed guerrilla, and that was all. There were

many shrugs of the shoulder, many doubtful whispers, at the hazards

which Campbell-Bannerman was taking in putting such a person into the

Cabinet. True, he was but one of the lesser appointments--namely, that

of president of the Board of Trade--but was he capable of even that

responsibility? Had he any capacity at all as an administrator? These

were the doubts pretty freely expressed in political circles when the

appointments to the new Cabinet were announced.

It is significant of the reserves in Lloyd George that from the time he

took his place among the line of Ministers on the Treasury bench he

began to show signs of qualities unsuspected. Gone was his

combativeness. He answered questions about his department with

urbanity, replied to criticism with courtesy and painstaking detail.

Out of the House he devoted himself assiduously to learning the

intricacies of his department. Very soon reforms began to be

manifested. The Board of Trade, an old and historic department,

largely bound up with red tape, became the most unconventional office

in Whitehall. Moreover, the activities of the Board of Trade began to

get an importance in Parliament that they had never hitherto possessed.

Novel measures were brought in by Lloyd George and, what was more

surprising, were successfully piloted into law by him. His grasp of

detail, his unfailing tact, his readiness to meet reasonable

objections, all contributed to the result. I do not mean that he was

always suave, because occasionally biting sentences would make

themselves felt as of old, but wherever courtesy and politeness were

forthcoming from opponents he returned them in full measure.

Responsibility was certainly having its effect on him.

He passed the Patents and Designs Act, formulated to compel

manufacturers holding British patents to make their goods in Britain

instead of abroad, and he passed also the Merchant Shipping Act, for

the purpose of giving British sailors better food and healthier

conditions of life. While the Board of Trade was thus forging its way

in public estimation it suddenly became the most important Government

department in the country. The railway men all over the lines planned

a strike to get more pay, a strike which would have dislocated if it

had not stopped all the trains in Britain. It is the business of the

Board of Trade to handle labor disputes. Lloyd George was at once in

the vortex. To the surprise of some, he took no extreme view, but

considered it his duty as a Minister first of all to keep the railways

running for the benefit of the community as a whole, and then after

that to secure some arrangement, if it were possible, by which the lot

of the railway men could be bettered. He flung into the struggle for

compromise the whole of the ardor which for years past he had devoted

to combat, and after ceaseless struggles with both sides during some

days and nights lie was successful in fixing up a scheme under which

the railways were continued in operation, and the men got a good deal

of what they asked for. All sections praised him, and the new Lloyd

George was acclaimed as something of a revelation.

His tenure as president of the Board of Trade was his first experience

as Cabinet Minister. He, nevertheless, established innovations the

thought of which would have given respectable and long-established

statesmen a shudder. He cared not a rap for convention. He was not in

the least afraid of his permanent officials, who so often control their

department and their political chief with it. A Cabinet Minister in

Britain is hedged with a certain divinity and is almost unapproachable

except under stated conditions. Lloyd George bewildered people with

his approachability, his unpretentiousness. During the strain of the

railway struggle he would exchange a cheery word with the waiting

newspaper reporters as he passed them on going in or out of his office,

an unheard-of thing for a Cabinet Minister to do. The second day was

cold and inclement when he stopped among them as he approached the

Board of Trade entrance. "There is no need for you gentlemen to wait

outside here in the cold. Come inside and I'll find you a room," he

said. He caused a comfortable apartment to be set aside for them

during their vigil, and each afternoon he caused tea and cigarettes to

be sent down to them to beguile the long period of waiting. Here is

another little story of his early days of office. A railway smash at

Shrewsbury resulted in the death of twenty people and the injury of a

great many more, and in accordance with the usual practice the Board of

Trade sent down immediately an inspector to investigate the cause of

the accident. But on this occasion not only did the inspector go down

to Shrewsbury, but his chief, the president of the Board of Trade,

also, quite a novel course for a high and mighty Cabinet Minister. I

was present as a journalist and remember seeing Lloyd George walking

along by the side of the dismantled lines, threading his way through

the wreckage, putting questions to the railway officials, and generally

seeking to probe out on his own account how the affair occurred. On

behalf of a score of special correspondents who had come down from

London, I stopped Lloyd George in the street as he was walking to his

hotel to ask him about the official inquiry. "Is it to be held in

private, as usual?" I said. "No," replied Lloyd George. "The inquiry

will be in public. Here are twenty people killed and the country has

the right to know why they were killed." That was the way he used to

break precedents. Next day we all went down to the Raven Hotel, the

appointed place, and the inspector proceeded with his work of examining

witnesses. Lloyd George sat by his side. I felt sorry for that

inspector--who usually was monarch of all he surveyed. He was a man of

dignified and leisurely manner. Lloyd George cut in and took the

examination of witnesses out of his mouth and, figuratively speaking,

turned them inside out in trying to get the facts. He did not consider

the position of the inspector one bit. But he made the inquiry a very

interesting one.

Despite his new manner on the Treasury bench in the House of Commons

Lloyd George had lost none of the freshness and suppleness of mind

which had distinguished him as a free-lance, and as he proceeded to do

unexpected things it became apparent he was going to be as vital a

figure in office as he had been on the back benches. Traces of

appreciation showed themselves in public comment, though his ancient

enemies, the Conservatives, held their dislike in reserve, and had some

forebodings in their hearts about the future. They knew quite well by

now that this Welshman could not be read at a glance.

Bits of the old Adam began to show up in Lloyd George's speeches as he

lent his aid on the platform in support of Liberal proposals. I

remember that at this time there was still a good deal of talk by the

Conservatives of tariff reform--that is to say, of the imposition of

import duties for protection and revenue purposes. The Liberals were

against the proposals, fought them strongly, and indeed by their

attitude had won a good deal of support in the election which returned

them to power. Lloyd George made some of his flaming speeches in

support of free trade against protection. Then came one night when the

Board of Trade Minister had to speak in the House of Commons as a

defender of the Government policy against a motion put forth by the

Opposition in favor of tariff reform. After speakers on both sides had

debated the topic for some hours it was Lloyd George's duty to wind up

the discussion for the Government. When he rose there was much

excitement on both sides and a good deal of shouting and

counter-shouting. Remarks were thrown across from the Opposition

benches indicating that Lloyd George's speeches about the evil of

tariff reform on the Continent had been exaggerated. "I have been

challenged," he said, "with regard to statements as to the food of the

poorer people in Germany, and I am going to give now, not my opinion,

but some hard facts." He held up a blue book. "This volume is the

last annual report of the Consul-General in Germany. The facts which I

shall quote are his facts, not mine. If you will not take my word, you

will at any rate be able to take his word." He turned to a marked

page. "Let us see what he says about a typical center, the city of

Chemnitz. Here are some interesting figures as to what the poorer

class eat in this tariff-reform paradise of Chemnitz." He proceeded to

read extracts. I cannot recall the extra figures, but Lloyd George's

phrases ran something like this: "This report states that in Chemnitz

last year there were sold in the shops two thousand tons of

horse-flesh. These are not my figures, mind, but those of the

Consul-General. I commend the figures to excited members opposite.

But horse-flesh is not the only thing the people through the pressure

of tariff reform are compelled to eat in Chemnitz. They even eat

dog-meat." (Cheers from the Liberals and derisive shouts from the

Conservatives.) "The Consul-General states that one thousand tons of

dog-meat were consumed in Chemnitz last year." (More shouting from

both sides.) "But there is even worse to come." Lloyd George's voice

took on a note of gravity, and the House hushed itself to listen. "Not

only horse-flesh, not only dog-meat, but five hundred tons of

donkey-flesh were sold in Chemnitz last year." He swung his finger

along the line of Opposition leaders and paused. "The fact has a

tragic significance for right honorable gentlemen who want to introduce

tariff reform into this country."

Then his speech had to be suspended for a full minute.

At this time the cause of tariff reform was going rapidly downhill.

Austen Chamberlain, the son of Joseph Chamberlain, strove hard to keep

it to the fore, and frequently at intervals in the House of Commons the

protectionist proposals were brought forward. Lloyd George had a

characteristic word to say about the situation one day. "I do not

blame Mr. Austen Chamberlain for sticking to his father. But the

considerations which have made him protectionist are not fiscal, but

filial. History ever repeats itself, and the boy still stands on the

burning deck."

By rapid steps Lloyd George became the outstanding figure of the

Government in which he occupied a comparatively minor position. Soon

he was as prominent in Britain as, when a youth, he was prominent in

Wales. Hardly a week passed in which he was not by his daring speeches

or actions raising storms of anger among opponents or choruses of

approval among the advanced Liberals. Vital force radiated from him.

When Campbell-Bannerman died in 1908 and Asquith, his Chancellor of the

Exchequer, became Prime Minister, it was on Lloyd George that his

choice fell as the new Chancellor. The public, dazzled at Lloyd

George's swift rise, withheld their judgment as to the wisdom of Mr.

Asquith's experiment in this elevation of the Welshman to the post of

second statesman in the United Kingdom. As for Lloyd George himself,

he took up the position with calmness and a gleaming eye. At last he

had his hand on the helm.

V

THE FIRST GREAT TASK

The biggest day in Lloyd George's life until he was called upon by the

King to form a Government was Thursday, April 29, 1909. On that day he

presented to Parliament and the country his first Budget--the framework

of taxation and legislation which was to be the foundation of a new

social system in Britain--which incidentally was to break the power of

the House of Lords and to lead to such a storm among all classes that the

aid of the King himself had to be invoked in order to carry out the plan

of the Welsh statesman.

Lloyd George: The Man and His Story · 第 2 / 8 段