Section III. FOWLS.

I am very fond of second courses, and devoutly believe that the

whole gallinaceous family was made to enrich our larders and to

deck our tables.

From the quail to the turkey, whenever we find a fowl of this

class, we are sure to find too, light aliment, full of flavor, and

just as fit for the convalescent as for the man of the most robust

health.

Which one of us, condemned to the fare of the fathers of the

desert, would not have smiled at the idea of a well-carved

chicken's wing, announcing his rapid rendition to civilized life?

We are not satisfied with the flavor nature has given to

gallinaceous fowls, art has taken possession of them, and under

the pretext of ameliorating, has made martyrs of them. They have

not only been deprived of the means of reproduction, but they have

been kept in solitude and darkness, and forced to eat until they

were led to an unnatural state of fatness.

It is very true that this unnatural grease is very delicious, and

that this damnable skill gives them the fineness and succulence

which are the delight of our best tables.

Thus ameliorated, the fowl is to the kitchen what the canvass is

to painters. To charlatans it is the cap of Fortunatus, and is

served up boiled, roasted, fried, hot, cold, whole or dismembered,

with or without sauce, broiled, stuffed, and always with equal

success.

Three portions of old France disputed for the honor of furnishing

the best fowls, viz: Caux, Mans, and Bresse.

In relation to capons, and about this there is some doubt, the one

on the table always seeming the best. Bresse seems, however, to

have pre-eminence in pullets, for they are round as an apple. It

is a pity they are so rare in Paris!

The Physiology of Taste; Or, Transcendental Gastronomy · 第 3 / 10 章