CHAPTER I

WANTED: A COOK

WANTED: A COOK

Domestic Dialogues

_By_

ALAN DALE

INDIANAPOLIS

THE BOBBS-MERRILL COMPANY

PUBLISHERS

Copyright, 1904

The Bobbs-Merrill Company

_To_ JENNIE SHALEK: _housewife_,

who, in my hour of drab and dreary cooklessness, when my heart

fainted, and tragedy impended, sent her four fair daughters to my

aid, with an ancient Hibernian curio destined to eke out a

livelihood at my expense; who knows the true inwardness of this

tragic topic, and who would gladly lend a willing hand and an

unwilling cook to any sufferer, I gratefully dedicate these simple,

plaintive dialogues.

ALAN DALE

_New York City_,

_September, 1904_

WANTED: A COOK

CHAPTER I

My Letitia! It was indeed a proud and glowing moment when I slipped the

little golden circlet on her fair, slim, girlish finger, and realized

that she was assuredly mine. We were so eminently suited to each

other--both young, enthusiastic, and unspotted from the world. We had

our own pet theories, and long before marriage we had communed on that

favorite, misunderstood topic--the sanctity of the home.

Letitia was exceedingly well-read, and the polish upon her education

shone. It was no mere thin veneer, to be worn off by a too brutal

contact with the rough edges of the world. It was an ingrained polish.

She adored the classics. Other girls would sit down and pore over the

Sarah-Jane romances of the hour. My Letitia liked Virgil. In French she

was fearfully familiar with Molière and Racine. In German she coquetted

with Schiller in the most delightful manner. She knew most of the

students' readings of Shakespeare. In fact, she fascinated me by her

arch refinement.

We were both great sticklers for refinement. We pitied the poor silly

things who knew how to sew and cook. Refinement--we were both certain of

it--was the cultivation of the gloriously useless. We despised the

abominably useful. It was so sordid. We felt convinced that our "home"

could be conducted upon suave and easy lines, without abandoning even

one of our theories. Letitia told me that "home" was the Anglo-Saxon

_ham_, and I was so much in love with her, that I didn't mind in the

least. In fact, I hinted that I had suspected as much. How could "home"

be anything else but Anglo-Saxon?

My little girl had been "finished" in Paris, at a select, and pleasingly

dismal, _pension_ in the Avenue du Roule. I, myself, had taken a B. A.

at Oxford. Yet we were triumphantly patriotic Americans. We returned to

these shores absolutely convinced that they were beyond criticism. After

all, people only go abroad in order that they may realize the

inferiority of Europe. They never go for a "good time," or for mere

frivolous amusement. The great armies of Americans in London and Paris

are there simply because they prefer America and want that fact brought

home to them. If you don't believe me, ask them. Nail them down to their

patriotism.

However, both Letitia and I grudgingly admitted that in England home

life did seem a bit more potent than on this side.

"It naturally would," said Letitia, "because you see 'home' is really an

Anglo-Saxon idea."

But we were going to have a home of our own in the very midst of

seething New York. The mere notion of a vulgar, degrading

"boarding-house" was detestable to us, while as for the "apartment

hotel," where you sat at dinner in your best clothes with a crowd of

unsympathetic strangers, we sniffed at the bare suggestion. We wanted a

little refuge, tiny yet dainty, where we could be alone to live our

lives. "To live our lives" was one of Letitia's expressions. She

abstracted it unconsciously, I believe, from Ibsen. A chaste and

cherishable resort, where of an evening my wife could read _The Iliad_

in the original, and I, in a becoming smoking-jacket and velvet

slippers, could work at my _Lives of Great Men_, was what we clamored to

possess. And possess it we fully intended to do.

I may add that Letitia also believed in the "new thought." She was of

the opinion that you could will anything you wanted. She doted on

sitting still, and sending out telepathic waves from her cunning little

brain, and I loved to look at her telepathing. She was at her

prettiest.

Aunt Julia Dinsmore, Letitia's only relative, and a sedate old lady with

drab ideas, mentioned something about the "servant question" as she

listened to our domestic rhapsodies. She suggested to us that there must

be some satisfactory reason to explain the lack of well-appointed homes

in New York. Americans liked comfort just as well as other people, said

she. Did we suppose that they were uncomfortable because they preferred

discomfort? And again she referred to the "servant question."

The "servant question"! How we laughed! Letitia nudged me under the

table and arched her eyebrows. She turned to Aunt Julia and quoted one

of Shakespeare's most beautiful passages:

"How well in thee appears

The constant service of the antique world,

When service sweat for duty, not for meed!"

It is one of the many charming things in _As You Like It_. Aunt Julia

said that it had nothing whatsoever to do with the case. Perhaps it

hadn't. In fact, as I think it over now, I can't quite see its

relevancy. Yet what mattered relevancy? It was a treat to listen to

Letitia when she quoted.

"Your Shakespeare will die when your cook comes in," said Aunt Julia,

and she laughed. People are so fond of laughing at their own epigrams.

It is most irritating--just as though the utterance of this perverted

form of philosophy were a relief.

"You dear silly old thing!" exclaimed Letitia to her aunt, "we shall not

worry. We don't read the comic papers. Americans believe all the

wretched jokes, dished up for them, to be founded on fact. Americans

believe anything. They have no time to think for themselves. Have they,

Archie?"

All I could reply was: "No." I should like to have been pungent and

clever, but somehow or other, I never can follow Letitia. She generally

appeals to me with a deft query, destined to color her own delightful

train of thought, and I have nothing better to say than "no"--or

occasionally "yes."

After that, Aunt Julia dropped the "servant question," as she called it.

The "servant question"! As though there could be such a question! How

could refined and educated people elect to permit the mere matter of

domestic drudgery to be a "question"? Art might be a question. Science

was certainly a question. But to allude to the handmaiden, who opens

your front door, or to the person who Marylands your terrapin, as a

"question" was too ludicrous. It was making mountains out of molehills.

Ah! Letitia and I were for the glorious mountains, with their sun-kissed

peaks and their exultant elevation.

We were neither of us freighted with that detestable thing dubbed a

"sense of humor." Thank goodness for that! A sense of humor is a

handicap in the world's race. People afflicted with it seem to spend

their time laughing at their friends, scoffing at serious situations,

and extracting spurious merriment from the gravity and dignity of life.

We both believed that a sense of humor was unrefined. Comic

story-tellers, comic poets, comic critics--how we loathed them! They

were parasites on the face of things, giving you stones when you craved

bread--furnishing nasty, sickly ridicule in lieu of delicate,

intellectual analysis. Thank goodness, that both Letitia and I had been

spared the curse of a "sense of humor." We had been educated beyond it.

Aunt Julia, as I said, was henceforth silent--or comparatively

silent--on her banal, squalid "servant question." But she was rampant

and interfering again when we selected the pretty little apartment--in a

beautiful neighborhood--that was to be our home--Letitia's and mine! We

took it without a question, there being nothing that we wanted to know.

It was not one of those American institutions in which, to get from the

drawing-room to the dining-room, you were forced to walk through the

bedrooms, no matter who happened to be in them, asleep, or dressing. It

had a "private hall," and each room possessed a window. Why each room

shouldn't possess a window, I can't explain, but windows in up-to-date

apartments are a luxury, and not a necessity. I dare say that they are

very old-fashioned, but they are one of the last remnants of old fashion

to which I cling.

It was a small apartment with "six rooms and bath"--very cozy, and quite

light and cheerful without furniture. After we had seen our dainty

"belongings" moved in, we were bound to admit that some people might say

that it all looked "stuffy." Letitia didn't think so; nor did I. Much we

cared!

Still, it was quite remarkable what a difference furniture made. It

really seemed to be in the way. The drawing-room was almost blocked up

with its chairs and sofas, what-nots, and ottomans. It had seemed quite

a spacious apartment when in its natural state. One would have thought

that it mutely rebelled at the indignity of furniture. Yet one must

furnish!

The only thing to do in our drawing-room was to sit down. It was quite

comfortable sitting down. It seemed like refuge to get to a chair--out

of harm's way. When up and doing, you had to dodge and to steer

yourself. We often went there before we were married, just to get used

to the position of the furniture. In front of the fireplace--where there

would never be any fire, as everything was steam-heated--we placed the

tiger-rug, with the real tiger-head, that Aunt Julia gave us. It was

rather dark by the fireplace, as a bookcase, a what-not, a dear little

_tête-à-tête_ chair and a "cosy corner" were in its vicinity and we

always fell over the tiger's head. It was most amusing at first. I

laughed when it brought Letitia down. Letitia laughed when she saw me

prone. But one tires so quickly of innocent pleasure! The last time we

visited the apartment before the gorgeous day when it literally became

"ours," I fell over the tiger-head, and--it palled. For the first time

it didn't seem so funny. I am glad to say that Letitia laughed just the

same, her mind being more ingenuous than mine.

In the dining-room, too, there was a wealth of furniture. It was such a

cheerful room when we first saw it, but when curtained and upholstered,

it was necessary to switch on the electric light in order to see where

the table was. Of course, this didn't matter at all. It was merely a new

experience and deliciously odd. Still, we both agreed that if we

preferred air and light to material, bodily comfort, our "home" was

infinitely brighter unfurnished. As a matter of fact, the simplest

necessities of domestic life were encumbrances. We had to ponder over an

extra chair. The disposal of a small footstool called for a

mathematical mind. As for the table, it had--like most other

tables--four legs, but three of them were ridiculously in the way. They

seemed like abnormal growths.

We were delighted at all this innovation. We prattled about our "home"

by the hour. These--or rather, this--might be the ancestral halls of our

great-great-grandchildren, though at present it seemed destined for one

generation at a time--and a small generation, too. There was scarcely

room for even an ancestor, and I couldn't help feeling thankful that

ancestors were not usual in New York.

The bedrooms surprised us. They were called bedrooms, because nobody had

yet thought out any other name for them. We were both loud in praise of

their coziness. They were simply full of coziness. There was no room for

anything else. Furnished with ledges or bunks as on board ship, they

would have been most spacious and agreeable. With beds in them they

bulged. Letitia admitted this, when I called her attention to it. She

laughed and quoted Ben Jonson's memorable words: "I will not lodge thee

by Chaucer, or Spenser, or bid Beaumont lie a little further to make

thee a room." And, as usual, I kissed her. Her splendid thoughts were

independent of mere space. They rose above and superior to close

modernity. Thank goodness, again, for the lack of a sense of humor! With

it, I might have said things about Chaucer, Spenser, and Beaumont, at

which the groundlings, would, perchance, have smiled. The humorists,

so-called, would sell their souls for a laugh.

We never once looked at the kitchen. Not for worlds would we have

betrayed so mean and petty a spirit. Undoubtedly there are women who

would have peered into this food-resort, and have held forth on such

disgusting topics as "tubs" and "hot and cold water." Ugh! How

nauseating! Letitia simply passed it by with a shrug. It _had_ to be

there, of course, but it had nothing to do with our case. Cook would

probably know if it were properly appointed. This was what cook was for.

The agent had told us that a bedroom for a cook was conveniently

adjoining. To which Letitia had replied, in evident amusement, "No

doubt. Why not?" I thought it clever, and I believe that the agent did,

for he turned his face quickly away.

Aunt Julia had supplied the cooking utensils, I am thankful to say. We

had no interest in them. We agreed that they were necessary, but we were

willing to pay, and to pay well, for a careful custodian of that sort of

thing. But as I began to say before, Aunt Julia, after having wisely

dropped the "servant question," became rampant and interfering on the

subject of our apartment. She asked distressing questions about "dumb

waiters," and "janitors," and "washing."

Letitia was reading Cicero's _De Amicitia_ at the time, I remember,

while I was making notes of some incidents in the life of Goethe that I

meant to incorporate in my book. I bore with Aunt Julia most patiently.

As I could not answer her questions, I parried them very good-naturedly.

After all, she was Letitia's only relative, and she was old, and rather

infirm. One must be polite, even when it would be excruciatingly

exquisite to be otherwise.

"I must say," remarked Aunt Julia, "that you don't seem to have looked

at anything. You have taken an apartment, and you know nothing at all

about it. You are a couple of silly children."

"Pardon me," I said, "but we have looked at all that it was necessary to

look at. I don't expect Letitia to grovel."

"Grovel!" cried Aunt Julia, "grovel! I like that. In my time, a

housewife knew what she was doing--"

"That's just it," I interrupted. "In your time, Aunt Julia, there were

housewives. I hate the phrase. Housewife--wife of the house. I want my

wife for myself, not for my house. In your time, I dare say, women so

far forgot themselves--yes, forgot themselves, Aunt Julia--as to discuss

the laundry, or the market, with their husbands. That, I may say, is not

our idea. I want your dear little niece to stay in her drawing-room--"

"Stay in her--what?" cried Aunt Julia ferociously.

"I repeat: her drawing-room. Oh, I know that you would prefer that I say

'parlor.' I decline to do so. It is a word that grates on my nerves. In

England, they have 'parlors' in hovels. You enter the 'parlor' direct

from the street. It is quite unnecessary to cast a stigma on a room.

Drawing-room sounds much more refined. With us it will be drawing-room."

"I think Archie is right, Aunt Julia," said Letitia, looking up from _De

Amicitia_, and smiling at me--dear little girl! "It is a prettier term,

isn't it? 'Parlor' sounds so awfully poor, and--well, dear, we are

really not awfully poor. It is the little refinements of life that

count. I don't think I could feel at home in a parlor. I just adore the

notion of my drawing-room."

Aunt Julia laughed. It wasn't one of those laughs that signify

merriment. It was that contemptuous something that we call a laugh for

want of a better word. I should classify it as a snortch, or a sniffth.

It angered me considerably.

"There are no drawing-rooms," continued Letitia's relative, "in

One-Hundred-and-Fourth Street, near Columbus Avenue. I should think you

would be satisfied to hear them called 'parlors.' Cubby-holes would be

more appropriate. Of course, I may be all wrong. Of course. Ha! Ha! To

talk as though you owned Marlborough House, or Buckingham Palace, or

Vanderbilt's mansion! Ha! Ha! It is too preposterous."

I saw a flush on my Letitia's face. She had closed her Cicero with a

sigh. All this small-talk was nerve-racking.

"A drawing-room," persisted Aunt Julia, "is literally the room to which

the guests withdraw after dinner. I imagine that your guests will

withdraw to it not only after dinner, but after luncheon and breakfast

as well. In fact they will be obliged to withdraw there or sit on the

fire-escape. By-the-by, have you a fire-escape?"

As though I knew or cared! Fancy selecting a home, and inquiring if

there were any means by which you could escape from it. I did not

answer. My mind was brooding over the question of withdrawing from the

dining-room. Next to our dining-room was the bathroom. It was rather an

odd arrangement, especially as bathing is considered dangerous

immediately after eating. The man who designed our "home" evidently

thought that a bath after a meal was a good thing. Otherwise, why place

the bathroom next to the dining-room?

I recovered my equanimity instantly. "You are trying to discourage us,

Aunt Julia," I said, "but it won't work. You can call the drawing-room a

'parlor' if you like. But we shan't. Nor are we trying to ape Buckingham

Palace. We are too American for that. The trouble here is that whenever

you try to be nice, refined, and courteous, you are accused of aping

something. We ape nothing at all. We prefer a drawing-room because it

has a more cultured sound. Just as we intend to call the china-closet a

'pantry.' This is a free country."

"Fiddlesticks!" cried Aunt Julia. "You are very devoted to your

drawing-room and your pantry, but I'm grieved to think that a sensible

girl like Letitia, and an able-bodied young man, like yourself, haven't

thought it worth while to ask the janitor about the disposition of the

garbage."

That settled it. I had endured a good deal. I had been patient, polite,

kindly, and amused. Yes, I had been half-amused. When I heard Aunt Julia

sully her lips with a word so coarse as "garbage" in the presence of my

innocent little unsophisticated Letitia, I decided that the time for

protest had indeed arrived.

"Mrs. Dinsmore," I said--not even "Aunt Julia"--"I must really ask you

to avoid such disgusting words and topics, or, if you must mention them,

to do so to me alone. I can stand it--perhaps. But it is not nice for

your niece. There may be such a thing as garbage in the world--I believe

that there is--but one does not care to allude to it at home."

I looked at Letitia. A slight expression of disgust manifested itself on

her face, although she tried for my sake to conceal it.

"It is a word that has come to us, Archie, from the old French _garbe_,"

she said quickly, with her own admirable tact. "It was once more

disgusting than it now seems to be. Americans use it to express kitchen

refuse or anything of that sort. Of course, our cook will have no

refuse, for we shall get a good one. Probably, in low, unrefined

households they do have refuse. It is possibly quite general--for

average people do not understand the refinement of living. Aunt Julia

meant nothing, I am sure."

Letitia, the sweetest and most diplomatic girl I have ever met, rose and

kissed Aunt Julia, and I was bound to feel mollified. Not that Aunt

Julia was in the least upset by my dignity. In fact, she was convulsed

with laughter, but it was the same sort of laughter that I prefer to

call a snortch, or a sniffth.

"If you ever eat oranges," she persisted in continuing, "what are you

going to do with the peel? And your potato skins? And your melon rinds?

And your old bones? And your tin cans? And your grocery boxes? That is

what we unrefined people call garbage. But I dare say that you and

Letitia will put it all in your drawing-room and make a cozy corner of

it, or tie it up with blue ribbons. You silly children!" she cried,

drying the laughter from her eyes, "if you weren't so amusing I could be

angry with you."

Letitia looked at me. I looked at Letitia. She put her index finger to

her lips to signify silence. It dawned upon us both that Aunt

Julia--poor old thing--was cursed with the terrible commodity known as

the "sense of humor." That is the way it always manifests itself. It is

irrelevant laughter at serious subjects. My opinion is that it is a

disease, and that a remedy for it will be found one day. They seem to be

discovering that remedy in the comic papers, which no longer, I have

heard, appeal to the afflicted.

Letitia went on reading _De Amicitia_; I renewed my acquaintance with

Goethe, and Aunt Julia fell asleep with a book in her hands. I couldn't

help seeing that it was called _Hints to Housewives_. Certainly

Letitia's only relative was a bit disenchanting.

Wanted: A Cook Domestic Dialogues · 第 1 / 17 章