Part 3 Guide and Adviser 66

Clara Barton National Historic Site: A Saga of Preservation 68

National Park Service Sites Associated with Clara Barton 72

National Park Service Sites Commemorating American Women 75

Related Sites 76

Armchair Explorations: Some Books You May Want to Read 78

Index 79

Clara Barton and Her Times

[Illustration: _The figures are, from left to right: Grand Duchess

Louise of Baden, Antoinette Margot, George Kennan, Julian Hubbell,

Clara Barton, and Jean-Henri Dunant._]

A Look at the Past

Clara Barton, humanitarian and founder of the American Red Cross, spent

the last 15 years of her life in a house in Glen Echo, Maryland, now

known as Clara Barton National Historic Site. Here her contributions to

American life and her personal achievements are memorialized. Here you

can see many of her personal effects and some of the awards given to

her. Here, too, you can learn of the substance of her life and see how

she lived and worked.

From Glen Echo, you can go on to several other National Park System

sites associated with Clara Barton: Antietam, Andersonville, Manassas,

Fredericksburg, and Johnstown. Together these diverse sites document her

life, her work, and her legacy. Begin here at her house and fill in

details of her life as you come across them at the other sites. For

example, the lumber you see in the building at Glen Echo was originally

used as temporary housing for victims of the Johnstown, Pennsylvania,

flood in 1889. After Clara Barton and the Red Cross finished helping the

injured and the homeless in that city, the structure was dismantled and

shipped to Washington, D.C. Two years later, the materials were used at

Glen Echo to construct a national headquarters for the American Red

Cross.

The new building had essentially the same lines as the Johnstown

structure with various alterations to accommodate the needs of the

American Red Cross and Clara Barton herself.

Initially she planned to use this building as a warehouse for American

Red Cross supplies. Six years after its construction, the building was

remodeled and used not only as a warehouse, but also as the headquarters

of the new organization and as the residence for her and her staff. The

structure served all purposes well. Clara Barton did not distinguish

between herself and the organization she founded. The lines were

blurred; she was the Red Cross, and the Red Cross was Clara Barton. That

is evident here in the house, for she did not separate living space from

working space. The building’s purposes merged in its principal resident.

Using the place as a home, Clara Barton learned to love the passage of

the seasons, to enjoy the way the light came in at different times of

the year, to plant the yard and garden the way she wanted. As a

headquarters and warehouse for the Red Cross, the building served her

well, too. She met there with many dignitaries and volunteers on Red

Cross business and stored supplies for potential disasters. Her home and

office testify to her complete and unequivocal devotion to the Red

Cross.

Less sharply focused is Clara Barton’s role in women’s rights. Miss

Barton was neither a traditional woman nor a radical feminist, although

Susan B. Anthony and Harriet Austin were friends. She did not repudiate

the traditional roles for women. Instead she succeeded in enlarging that

accepted sphere so that the traditional skills of women—teaching

children, nursing the sick—became acceptable in the public sphere. Clara

Barton argued for women’s equality and believed in their right to vote.

But concern for her fledgling organization overrode her dedication to

women’s rights and all other causes.

At her home and office in Glen Echo you can begin to sense this complex,

fascinating individual: the public and private person so inextricably

intertwined. You sense the space in which Clara Barton moved, worked,

and thought. Impressions coalesce into an image. And yet that image

cannot become distinct without understanding her many ideas, desires,

and efforts noted in her diaries, letters, and papers. This handbook

tells the story of her eventful 90 years. The next few pages contain a

brief chronology of her life and times. Part 2 provides a full-length

biographical essay by historian Elizabeth Brown Pryor. Barton in both

triumph and defeat is here for the reader to accept, reject, or wonder

at. Many of her own words are here to explain more fully what she was

thinking—and worrying—about. The biography amplifies the chronology,

making it come alive with the whims and inconsistencies of human nature.

It’s a book within a book. And Part 3 is a guide to sites, managed by

the National Park Service and other public and private organizations,

associated with Clara Barton and her career.

Together the three parts of this handbook provide a clear image of one

of the most outstanding women of the 19th century, Clara Barton.

A Chronology

1821 Clara Barton is born December 25 in North Oxford,

Massachusetts

1825 John Quincy Adams becomes President; Erie Canal opens

1829 Andrew Jackson becomes President

1830 U.S. population is 12,866,020; Peter Cooper builds first

U.S. locomotive

1832 Clara Barton nurses brother David back to health; Louisa

May Alcott is born

[Illustration: _Louisa May Alcott_]

1834 Cyrus McCormick patents reaper

1835 Sarah and Angelina Grimké become active abolitionists;

Samuel Colt patents revolver

[Illustration: _Sarah Grimké_]

[Illustration: _Angelina Grimké_]

1837 Martin Van Buren becomes President

1839 Clara Barton begins teaching school in North Oxford and

continues teaching for the next 11 years; Mount Holyoke,

first college for women, opens

[Illustration: _Clara Barton as a schoolteacher_]

1841 William Henry Harrison becomes President, dies April 4 and

is succeeded by John Tyler

1842 Use of anesthetics begins in U.S.

1844 First telegraphic message sent by S.F.B. Morse

1845 James K. Polk becomes President; Margaret Fuller publishes

_Woman in the Nineteenth Century_; Frederick Douglass

publishes _Narrative of the Life of Frederick Douglass, an

American Slave_

1846 Mexican War begins, ends in 1848

1847 American Medical Association is founded

1848 First Women’s Rights Convention is held in Seneca Falls,

New York

1849 Zachary Taylor becomes President, dies July 9, 1850, and is

succeeded by Millard Fillmore; Elizabeth Blackwell becomes

first woman to receive M.D. degree

1850 Clara Barton plans to enter Clinton Liberal Institute,

Clinton, New York; Harriet Tubman begins helping slaves

escape via Underground Railway

[Illustration: _Harriet Tubman_]

1851 Clara Barton’s mother dies

1852 Clara Barton starts free school at Bordentown, New Jersey;

Harriet Beecher Stowe’s _Uncle Tom’s Cabin_ is published

[Illustration: _Harriet Beecher Stowe_]

1853 Franklin Pierce becomes President; Singer sewing machine

factory opens

1854 Clara Barton moves to Washington, D.C., and becomes clerk

in Patent Office—at that time the _only_ female employed by

U.S. Government

1857 Battle of Solferino is fought June 24; James Buchanan

becomes President

1859 Edwin Drake drills first oil well

1860 U.S. population is 31,443,321 (includes 3,953,760 slaves

and 448,800 free blacks)

1861 Clara Barton begins aid to Union soldiers; Abraham Lincoln

becomes President, is assassinated April 15, 1865, and is

succeeded by Andrew Johnson; American Civil War begins with

firing on Fort Sumter, South Carolina, and ends 1865 at

Appomattox Court House, Virginia

[Illustration: _Union soldiers near Falmouth, Virginia_]

[Illustration: _Abraham Lincoln_]

1862 Clara Barton’s father dies; _Un Souvenir de Solferino_ is

published by Jean-Henri Dunant

1864 Clara Barton becomes supervisor of nurses for the Army of

the James; Treaty of Geneva is signed, thereby establishing

the International Red Cross

1865 Clara Barton works at Andersonville, Georgia, to establish

national cemetery

1867 U.S. purchases Alaska; first practical typewriter is

developed by Christopher Sholes

1868 Andrew Johnson is acquitted in impeachment proceedings;

Susan B. Anthony and Elizabeth Cady Stanton begin

publication of _The Revolution_

[Illustration: _Susan B. Anthony_]

[Illustration: _Elizabeth Cady Stanton_]

1869 Clara Barton begins travels in Europe that last until 1873,

and meets Dr. Louis Appia of the International Committee of

the Red Cross; U.S. Secretary of State Hamilton Fish

rejects Treaty of Geneva; Ulysses S. Grant becomes

President; first state board of health is established in

Massachusetts

1870 Clara Barton works with Red Cross during Franco-Prussian

War, which lasts until 1871

[Illustration: _Grand Duchess Louise of Baden_]

1872 Victoria Woodhull becomes first woman to run for U.S.

President

1873 First school of nursing is established at Bellevue Hospital

in New York City

1874 Clara Barton meets Julian Hubbell in Dansville, New York;

Frances Willard founds Women’s Christian Temperance Union;

electric streetcars begin running in New York City

[Illustration: _Julian Hubbell_]

1876 Clara Barton collaborates with Susan B. Anthony on

biographies of noted women; Alexander Graham Bell invents

telephone

1877 Clara Barton begins correspondence with Louis Appia with

goal of having U.S. ratify Treaty of Geneva; Rutherford B.

Hayes becomes President

[Illustration: _Rutherford B. Hayes_]

1879 Edison invents incandescent light bulb

[Illustration: _Drawing from Thomas Edison’s notebook, September

1879_]

1881 Clara Barton founds American Association of the Red Cross,

is elected president, establishes first local chapter of

the America Red Cross at Dansville, New York, and aids

victims of Michigan forest fires; James A. Garfield becomes

President, is shot July 2, and is succeeded by Chester

Arthur

[Illustration: _James A. Garfield_]

[Illustration: _Chester Arthur_]

1882 Clara Barton helps victims of Ohio and Mississippi river

floods; U.S. Senate ratifies Treaty of Geneva, March 16,

and ratification is proclaimed July 26

[Illustration: _Steamboats left high and dry by floodwaters_]

1883 Clara Barton serves for a short period as superintendent of

Women’s Reformatory Prison in Sherborn, Massachusetts, and

aids victims of tornadoes in Louisiana and Alabama

1884 Clara Barton assists survivors of Ohio and Mississippi

river floods; International Red Cross adopts “American

Amendment;” study of tuberculosis begins in earnest

1885 Ottmar Mergenthaler invents linotype machine; Grover

Cleveland becomes President

1886 Clara Barton sends relief to Charleston, South Carolina,

after earthquake

1888 Clara Barton organizes care of Jacksonville, Florida,

yellow fever victims; George Eastman perfects hand camera

1889 Clara Barton works at Johnstown, Pennsylvania, flood scene;

Benjamin Harrison becomes President; Jane Addams opens Hull

House in Chicago; Mayo brothers open clinic in Rochester,

Minnesota

[Illustration: _Jane Addams_]

1890 U.S. population stands at 62,947,714

1891 Clara Barton builds house at Glen Echo, Maryland

[Illustration: _The house at Glen Echo_]

1892 Clara Barton organizes relief for victims of drought and

famine in Russia

1893 Clara Barton sends relief to victims of Sea Island

hurricane; Grover Cleveland becomes President; Lillian Wald

establishes Henry Street Settlement House in New York City

[Illustration: _Lillian Wald_]

1895 Röntgen discovers X-rays

1897 Clara Barton moves to Glen Echo; William McKinley becomes

President, is shot September 6, 1901, dies September 14,

and is succeeded by Theodore Roosevelt

1898 Clara Barton takes the Red Cross to the front lines during

Spanish-American War, which lasts from April 11 to August

13, and publishes _The Red Cross in Peace and War_

[Illustration: _Red Cross ambulance used during the Spanish-American

War_]

1900 Clara Barton organizes relief for Galveston, Texas, after

hurricane and tidal wave, and receives growing criticism

for way she is managing the Red Cross; Federal charter

granted to the American National Red Cross; Walter Reed

discovers that mosquitoes transmit yellow fever

1901 Jean-Henri Dunant shares, with Frederic Passy, the first

Nobel Peace Prize; Marconi transmits first radio signal

across the Atlantic

1902 Arthur Little patents rayon

1903 Wright brothers fly their first airplane

[Illustration: _The first flight_]

1904 Clara Barton resigns as president of the American National

Red Cross; Mabel Boardman takes control until 1946

[Illustration: _Mabel Boardman_]

1905 Clara Barton forms the National First Aid Society

1907 Clara Barton publishes _The Story of My Childhood_

[Illustration: _At her desk in Glen Echo_]

1909 William Howard Taft becomes President

1912 Clara Barton dies April 12 at Glen Echo at age 90

1915 President Woodrow Wilson lays cornerstone for American

National Red Cross headquarters in Washington, D.C.

1963 Friends of Clara Barton, Inc., purchases house at Glen Echo

1974 The U.S. Congress establishes on October 26 Clara Barton

National Historic Site

1975 National Park Service assumes responsibility for Clara

Barton National Historic Site

The Professional Angel

[Illustration: _Clara Barton and Red Cross workers in Tampa,

Florida, await transportation to return to Cuba in 1898._]

Square as a Brick

As a woman of 87, Clara Barton remembered “nothing but fear” when she

looked back to her childhood. She portrayed herself as an introspective,

insecure child, too timid to express her thoughts to others. Yet this

girl who felt terror in all new situations possessed the qualities that

enabled her to overcome that fear, indeed to become the woman most

universally acclaimed as courageous in American history.

Her childhood was unusual. She was born on December 25, 1821, in North

Oxford, Massachusetts, and named Clarissa Harlowe Barton after an aunt,

who in turn had been named for a popular novel of her day. Her parents,

Capt. Stephen Barton and Sarah Stone Barton, had four other children,

all at least 10 years of age by the time this child was born. Thus

Clara—as she was always called—was born into a world of adults and, as

she later recalled, “had no playmates, but in effect six fathers and

mothers.” She might well have added “six teachers,” for she noted that

“all took charge of me, all educated me according to personal taste.”

[Illustration: _Sarah Stone Barton was a native New Englander and

was born in 1787. She married at age 17, and in her first seven

years of marriage, she gave birth to her first four children. The

last, Clara, followed after a ten-year interval._]

Sally Barton, her mother, was an erratic, nervous woman, with a

reputation for profanity and a violent temper. She vented her

frustrations in compulsive housework, and Clara Barton later recalled

that her mother “never slept after 3 o’clock in the morning” and “always

did two days work in one.” Sally Barton spent little time with her

youngest daughter, preferring to leave her with other family members.

Thus Clara Barton learned political and military lore from her father,

mathematics from her brother Stephen, and horseback riding from brother

David. Her two sisters, Sally and Dolly, concentrated on teaching her

academic subjects. Besides this household instruction, she attended both

private and public schools in the Oxford area.

She was a serious child, anxious to learn, but timid to try. Her later

reminiscences of childhood were filled with stories of frightful

thunderstorms, intimidating schools, encounters with snakes, and

crippling illnesses. When she was six her sister Dolly, who had been an

intellectual girl, became mentally unbalanced, and the family had to

lock her in a room with barred windows. Once Dolly escaped and chased

David’s wife, Julia, around the yard with an ax in her hand. Clara

Barton never publicly mentioned her sister’s insanity, but she privately

thought the illness had been brought on by Dolly’s unfulfilled desire to

obtain a higher education. This rather frantic home-life and the

presence of Dolly in the Barton household must have added greatly to her

timidity and to her later emotional instability.

Barton developed great loyalty for her family, eccentric as they were.

On one occasion she nursed her brother David for two years after he was

seriously injured in a fall. Later she used her political influence to

assist family members; for example, to defend a cousin’s job or to

secure suitable military appointment for a relative. Throughout her life

she was a faithful correspondent, continually interested in the affairs

of nephews, nieces, cousins, brothers, and sisters. And in later years

she described her family life in glowing terms, never mentioning her

mother’s tantrums or Dolly’s insanity. Her devotion also extended to

family friends.

The Bartons were quintessentially industrious. David and Stephen Barton

were businessmen, successful pioneers of milling techniques. Clara

Barton’s two sisters taught school; a cousin became the first woman Post

Office official in Worcester County, Massachusetts. Such diligence was

one of the great influences in Clara Barton’s life. “You have never

known me without work,” she wrote when in her eighties, “and you never

will. It has always been a part of the best religion I had.”

She began work early. She had been an intellectually precocious child

and by her late teens was competent to teach. She first taught in the

Oxford schools, and later she conducted classes for the children of

workers in the Barton family mills. In these one-room schools she gained

a reputation for first-rate scholarship and excellent discipline. She

expelled and whipped students when necessary, but mostly she cajoled

them into obedience through affection and respect. When her first school

won the district’s highest marks for discipline, she remonstrated: “I

thought it the greatest injustice ... [for] there had been no

discipline.... Child that I was, I did not know that the surest test of

discipline is its absence.”

Barton was introspective and keenly aware of herself as an individual,

and this enabled her to view her students individually. She gave them

such personal attention that scores of former pupils wrote to her in

later years, confident that their uniqueness had touched her. Barton in

turn called her pupils “my boys” and made no apologies for her loyalty.

“They were all mine,” she recalled in the second part of her

autobiography, “second only to the claims and interests of the real

mother.... And so they had remained. Scattered over the world, some

near, some far, I have been their confidant.... I count little in

comparison with the faithful grateful love I hold today of the few

survivors of my Oxford school.”

Teaching thus reinforced her loyalty and her sense of individuality. Her

excellence as an instructor also had the effect of mitigating her

introversion and strengthening her self-assurance. Indeed, she became

confident enough to teach the roughest district schools and to demand

pay equal to a man’s. “I may sometimes be willing to teach for nothing,”

she told one school board, “but if paid at all, I shall never do a man’s

work for less than a man’s pay.”

In 1850, after more than ten years of successful teaching, she felt

compelled to “find a school ... to teach _me_ something.” Female

academies were rare. She settled upon the Clinton Liberal Institute in

Clinton, New York, and took as many classes as possible in her course.

The institute was, in many ways, an ideal academy for Barton. The

school’s liberal philosophy and broad approach to education for women

corresponded with her family’s liberal traditions and her own political

and religious feelings. Moreover, the climate of New England and New

York in the 1830s and 1840s was one of intellectual and moral

progressiveness: Horace Mann instituted far-reaching educational reforms

in Massachusetts; Ralph Waldo Emerson wrote about the philosophic basis

of human liberty; religion lost its evangelistic approach; William Lloyd

Garrison expounded on the plight of the enslaved black; and a few women

such as Elizabeth Cady Stanton realized that their position was little

better than that of slaves and protested against it.

None of this activity was lost on Clara Barton, who possessed an innate

sense of honesty and justice. She became an early advocate of rights for

women. “I must have been born believing,” she wrote, “in the full right

of woman to all the privileges and positions which nature and justice

accord her in common with other human beings. Perfectly equal

rights—human rights. There was never any question in my mind in regard

to this.” She supported the cause of woman suffrage, for she maintained

that while a woman was denied the vote she “had no rights and ... must

submit to wrongs, and because she submits to wrongs she isn’t anybody.”

Yet she steadfastly asserted her rights and deemed it “ridiculous that

any sensible, rational person should question it.” Although she did not

participate in women’s rights rallies until later in her life, she

always acted on her principles. In February 1861, for example, Barton

began to champion the cause of her cousin, Elvira Stone, a postmistress

who was about to lose her job to a man. Barton laid the unpleasant facts

before her friends in Washington without hesitation: “As Cousin Elvira

had never taken any parts [_sic_] in politics ... political tendencies

can scarcely be made a pretext, neither incompetence, neglect of

business, location or lack of a proper recognition of, or attention to,

the wants of the community in any manner—And it would not _look well_ to

commence a petition with _Mankind_ being naturally prone to selfishness

we hereby etc., etc.—And I have been able to divine nothing except that

she is guilty of being a woman.” By April she had secured her cousin’s

position. She dryly remarked that Elvira Stone was certainly entitled to

it, for, “I have never learned that the [post office] proceeds arising

from the female portion of the correspondence of our country were

deducted from the revenue.”

[Illustration: _Stephen Barton was a descendant of Edward Barton who

had come to Salem, Massachusetts, in 1640. Stephen, born in 1774,

served in the Indian Wars in Ohio Territory during the 1790s under

Mad Anthony Wayne._]

[Illustration: _David Barton was a keen horseman. In later years

Clara Barton referred to him as the “Buffalo Bill of the

neighborhood” when recalling the events of her childhood. David and

his brother Stephen owned and operated a satinet mill: satinet was a

kind of cotton cloth._]

Barton felt that by winning such small battles, her larger feminist

principles were upheld. But her real contribution in these early years

was her own attitude and actions. By demonstrating that her talents,

courage, and intellect were undeniably equal to a man’s she quietly

furthered the women’s cause as much as parades and speeches did. “As for

my being a woman,” she told the men who questioned her, “[you] will get

used to that.”

Her interest in the extension of liberties for women was not selfishly

inspired. Rather it was a product of her deep-rooted sense of integrity

and fairness. She believed rigidly in human rights, especially in the

rights of those unable to defend or help themselves. “What is

everybody’s business is nobody’s business,” Barton once declared. “What

is nobody’s business is my business.” Her advocacy of equality colored

her political views.

Neither could Barton tolerate dishonesty and petty arrogance. More than

once during the Civil War she railed against “the conduct of improper,

heartless, unfaithful Union officers” who blithely ignored the plight of

the “dirty, lousy, common soldiers.” She expected high standards of

politicians, soldiers, and schoolboys alike. Once when a former pupil

had misused some money she had entrusted to him, she lamented: “I am

less grieved by the loss than I am about his manner of treating my

trust.... I am as square as a brick and I expect my boys to be square.”

In 1852, Barton demonstrated the sincerity of her principles in a

dramatic way. She left Clinton to stay with a schoolmate near

Bordentown, New Jersey, and taught at a private subscription school, for

there were no free public schools. She felt uneasy about the numbers of

children whose parents could not afford private instruction, and she

began to agitate for a free school. But the popular view was that free

schools were a form of charity. She refused to give in and eventually

swayed the local school board. A small house was outfitted, and she

began to lead one of the first free schools in the state.

The Bordentown free school was a pronounced success. In its first year

the number of pupils rose from 6 to 600, and the town built a new

school-house. The town, however, could not accept a woman as the head of

a school of 600 pupils and a man was named principal. She became his

assistant. “I could bear the ingratitude, but not the pettiness and

jealousy of this principal.”

Whether the pettiness was real or imagined, Barton could not endure a

secondary position. While she debated resignation, her nerves gave way,

causing a case of laryngitis. Early in 1854, she resigned and left for

Washington, D.C., where she hoped to improve her health and “do

something decided” with her newly realized “courage and tolerable

faculty of winning [her] way with strangers.”

Barton’s health did improve in Washington, and she was soon able to “do

something decided.” Charles Mason, the commissioner of patents, hired

her as a clerk. At this time no women were permanently employed by the

Federal Government though previously there had been. Most officials

agreed with Secretary of the Interior Robert McClelland who declared

that there was an “obvious impropriety in the mixing of the two sexes

within the walls of a public office.” She gained the confidence of

Commissioner Mason, however, and became his most competent and trusted

clerk. Moreover, she combatted the many dishonest clerks who sold patent

privileges illegally. The whole affair, she concluded, made quite a

commotion, and the clerks “tried to make it too hard for me. It wasn’t a

very pleasant experience; in fact it was very trying, but I thought

perhaps there was some question of principle involved and I lived

through it.”

[Illustration: _James Buchanan (1791-1869) held several public

offices before becoming President in 1857. He was a member of the

Pennsylvania House of Representatives and of the U.S. House of

Representatives and Senate. He was secretary of state for James K.

Polk and ambassador to Great Britain during the Presidency of

Franklin Pierce. As President he felt powerless to deal with the

States that seceded in the last months of his administration though

he abhorred their actions. He retired to his home in Lancaster,

Pennsylvania._]

Although she lost her job at the Patent Office under the Buchanan

administration in 1856, Barton was reappointed late in 1860. She enjoyed

living in Washington, for she was fascinated by politics and liked

knowing such prominent figures as Massachusetts Senator Henry Wilson.

She often sat in the Senate gallery to watch the proceedings and became

astute and well-informed on political matters.

Clara Barton was still a clerk at the Patent Office when the Civil War

began. Like many other intelligent and independent women of her day, she

was often filled with restless discontent, probably stemming from having

more to give than life demanded. Her job as Patent Office clerk demanded

little but self-effacement and neat penmanship. The conflict that arose

in 1861 provided her with an outlet for her energy and satisfied her

longing to lose herself in her work and to be needed.

Doing Something Decided

[Illustration: _When President Lincoln issued his call for

volunteers to maintain the Union, the response was immediate and

troops began heading for Washington. Some Massachusetts volunteers

passing through Baltimore, which was decidedly Southern in

sentiment, were attacked by local citizens._]

In late April 1861, less than two weeks after the bombardment of Fort

Sumter in South Carolina, the Massachusetts Sixth Regiment arrived in

Washington, D.C., from Massachusetts. This regiment hailed from the

Worcester area and many of the men were friends or former pupils of

Clara Barton. Their train was mobbed while passing through Baltimore,

and Barton, concerned that one of her “boys” might have been injured,

rushed to their temporary quarters in the Senate Chamber. She found the

Regiment unharmed, but sadly lacking in basic necessities—“towels and

handkerchiefs ... serving utensils, thread, needles ... etc.” She bought

and distributed as many of these items as she could, then wrote to the

anxious families in Massachusetts to send preserved fruits, blankets,

candles, and other supplies to supplement the unreliable army issues.

“It is _said_ upon proper authority, that ‘our army is supplied,’” she

wrote to a group of ladies in Worcester, “how this can be so I fail to

see.” When the generous New Englanders inundated her with useful

articles and stores, Barton’s home became a virtual warehouse. “It may

be in these days of quiet idleness they have really no pressing wants,”

she observed, “but in the event of a battle who can tell what their

needs might grow to in a single day?” Such garnering of supplies against

unforeseen disaster eventually became a central characteristic of her

relief work in the years to come.

Barton’s earliest concern with aiding the Union army stemmed from her

loyalty to the Massachusetts men. She felt a personal involvement with

those who “only a few years ago came every morning ... and took their

places quietly and happily among my scholars” and an allegiance to

others from her home state. “They formed and crowded around me,” she

noted. “What could I do but go with them, or work for them and my

country? The patriot blood of my father was warm in my veins.”

Her patriotism also was aroused by the Union cause. Although she

maintained that the purpose of the war was not solely to abolish

slavery, she also held little sympathy for the Southern way of life and

aligned herself with such Republicans as Henry Wilson who believed that

historically the Southern states had conspired to tyrannize the North.

“Independence!” she once scoffed, “they always had their independence

till they madly threw it away.” She was exhilarated. “This conflict is

one thing I’ve been waiting for,” she told a friend, “I’m well and

strong and young—young enough to go to the front. If I can’t be a

soldier I’ll help soldiers.” And feeling even more exalted, she declared

that “when there is no longer a soldier’s arm to raise the Stars and

Stripes above our Capitol, may God give strength to mine.”

For a year Barton contented herself with soliciting supplies. Then, as

the horrible effects of battle were reported in Washington, she began to

think of aiding soldiers directly on the battlefield. She had visited

hospitals and invalid camps, but what disturbed her most were the tales

of suffering at the front. Soldiers often had wounds unnecessarily

complicated by infection due to neglect, or died of thirst while waiting

for transportation to field hospitals. Nurses were urgently needed at

the battlefield, but she wondered if it was seemly for a woman to place

herself directly in the lines of battle: “I struggled ... with my sense

of propriety, with the appalling fact that I was only a woman whispering

in one ear, and thundering in the other [were] the groans of suffering

men dying like dogs.”

Her father encouraged her to go where her conscience directed. When

Captain Barton died in March 1862, she felt that her duties to the

family had closed. She petitioned Massachusetts Gov. John Andrew and

other government officials for permission to join General Burnside’s

division at the front. Late in the summer of 1862, at the Battle of

Cedar Mountain, Virginia, she “broke the shackles and went to the

field.”

At Cedar Mountain, and the subsequent second battle of Bull Run, she

began a remarkable service which continued to the end of the war. Here,

for the first of many times, Barton and her “precious freights” were

transported in railroad cars or by heavy, jolting army wagons to a scene

of utter desolation and confusion. When she arrived at Bull Run, 3,000

wounded men were lying in a sparsely wooded field on straw, for there

was no other bedding. Most had not eaten all day; many faced amputations

or other operations. She was unprepared for such carnage, but she

distributed coffee, crackers, and the few other supplies she had

brought. With calico skirt pinned up around her waist, she moved among

the men and prayed that the combination of lighted candles and dry straw

would not result in a fire that would engulf them.

[Illustration: _Andersonville prison camp in Georgia_]

[Illustration: _Confederate dead at Antietam_]

Scanty as her supplies were, Barton’s aid was timely and competent. An

army surgeon, Dr. James I. Dunn, wrote to his wife: “At a time when we

were entirely out of dressings of every kind, she supplied us with

everything, and while the shells were bursting in every direction ...

she staid [_sic_] dealing out shirts ... and preparing soup and seeing

it prepared in all the hospitals.... I thought that night if heaven ever

sent out a homely angel, she must be one, her assistance was so timely.”

Dunn’s letter was widely published during the Civil War, and he was

embarrassed that his private portrayal of Barton as a “homely angel”

ever saw print. She, too, seems to have been embarrassed, for she

crossed the word out on the newspaper clippings she kept and substituted

the word “holy” for “homely.” Although the original letter shows that

Dunn did indeed mean “homely,” Barton’s biographers have taken their cue

from her and given her the title “the holy angel.”

These early battles taught Clara Barton how poorly prepared the Union

army was for the immense slaughter taking place and how immediate

battlefield aid meant much more than a battalion of nurses back in

Washington.

In quick succession the battles of Fairfax Court House and Chantilly

followed second Bull Run. A surgeon recalled that at Chantilly “we had

nothing but our instruments—not even a bottle of wine. When the

[railroad] cars whistled up to the station, the first person on the

platform was Miss Barton again to supply us with ... every article that

could be thought of. She staid [_sic_] there till the last wounded

soldier was placed on the cars.” She worked for five days in the pouring

rain with only two hours of sleep. As at all battles, she took time to

jot down the names of many wounded men, so that their families could be

informed.

Barely two weeks later, on September 14, she again went to the field,

this time with advance information about a battle to be fought near

Harpers Ferry, Virginia (now West Virginia). She arrived too late but

rushed on to Antietam, which she reached at the height of battle on

September 17. Once again, she cooked gruel, braved enemy fire to feed

the wounded, and provided surgeons with precious medical supplies. She

had a narrow escape from death when a bullet passed under her arm,

through the sleeve of her dress, and killed the wounded soldier cradled

in her arms.

In all this fury, Barton was unflappable. At the Battle of

Fredericksburg in December 1862, “a shell destroyed the door of the room

in which she was attending to wounded men,” recalled co-worker Rev. C.M.

Welles. “She did not flinch, but continued her duties as usual.” And she

was working at the Lacy House, where hundreds of men were crowded into

12 rooms, when a courier rushed up the steps and placed a crumpled,

bloody slip of paper in her hands. It was a request from a surgeon

asking her to cross the Rappahanock River to Fredericksburg where she

was urgently needed. As always, hospital space was inadequate, and dying

men, lying in the December chill, were freezing to the ground. With

shells and bullets whistling around her, Barton bravely crossed the

swaying pontoon bridge. As she reached the end of the bridge an officer

stepped to her side to help her down. “While our hands were raised, a

piece of an exploding shell hissed through between us, just below our

arms, carrying away a portion of both the skirts of his coat and my

dress.” She made her way into Fredericksburg without further mishap. She

was lucky; the gallant officer who helped her on the bridge was brought

to her a half hour later—dead.

Bravery and timeliness were conspicuous elements of Barton’s Civil War

service. But of equal importance was her compassion for the individual

soldier. And she treated the wounded of both sides alike. Her relief

work was also notable for its resourcefulness. She built fires,

extracted bullets with a pocket knife, made gallons of applesauce, baked

pies “with crinkly edges,” drove teams, and performed last rites. When

all other food gave out she concocted a mixture of wine, whiskey, sugar,

and army biscuit crumbs. “Not very inviting,” she admitted, “but always

acceptable.” When she lacked serving implements, she emptied jars of

fruit and jelly and used them. When tired she propped herself against a

tent pole or slept sitting up in a wagon. The common soldier remembered

her sympathy and tenderness, the officer her calmness and alert activity

under fire.

As historian R.H. Bremer notes, Barton viewed her role in the war as

something of a family matter. If she was a “ministering angel,” she was

also “everybody’s old-maid aunt”—fussing over “my boys,” worrying over

clothes and food, and treating the men as fond nephews. Much of her

success with quartermasters, officers, and men was due to this attitude,

which eclipsed suspicion of her as a woman and radiated the

sentimentality of the time.

She pursued her self-appointed task with remarkable tenacity. Her

contribution was unique, for she worked directly on the battlefield, not

behind the lines in a hospital. She worked primarily alone—and liked it

that way. Although she respected such organizations as the Sanitary

Commission, she felt that by working independently she could comfortably

assist where she saw need. She wanted to be her own boss and be

appreciated for her individual efforts. She did not seek glory, but she

needed praise and did not wish to have it bestowed on the name of an

impersonal group or commission.

There is no question that Clara Barton hugely enjoyed acclaim. She liked

being in the inner elite of wartime politics, for it gave her the chance

to shine as a personality, to be revered as an “Angel of the

Battlefield.” In later life she enjoyed trips to Europe that amounted to

triumphal tours.

Barton’s relief work benefitted her in another way. Throughout her life

she was self-conscious and introspective, preoccupied with small

personal incidents which she magnified out of proportion to their

importance. She once described herself as “like other people ... only

sometimes a ‘little more so,’” and the description is apt. She was

inwardly pessimistic, and highly sensitive to criticism. She confided to

her diary that she felt “pursued by a shadow” and spent years with

“scarcely one cheerful day.” Periodically she became so depressed that

she could not “see much these days worth living for; cannot but think it

will be a quiet resting place when all these cares and vexations and

anxieties are over, and I no longer give or take offense. I ... have

grown weary of life at an age when other people are enjoying it most.”

_Continues on page 30_

“They Saw in High Purpose a Duty to Do”[1]

[Illustration: _Dorothea Dix (1802-87) started teaching Sunday

School at the East Cambridge House of Corrections in Massachusetts

in 1841. The appalling conditions she observed there spurred her to

attempt to reform prisons and mental institutions. This work

preoccupied her the rest of her life. She died in Trenton, New

Jersey._]

Clara Barton was not the only civilian who ministered to the wounded

during the Civil War. The nature of this conflict was so personal and

so immediate that many hundreds of volunteers gave enormously of their

time in hospitals and on the field. In the North, Dorothea Dix

interrupted her pre-war work with the insane to become superintendent

of Female Nurses; Walt Whitman, Louisa May Alcott, Frances Dana Gage,

and “Mother” Mary Ann Bickerdyke are a few of the other famous names

connected with such service. Of especial importance were the Christian

and Sanitary Commissions, organizations which worked with the

government in camp and on the battlefield to improve the lot of the

Union soldier. In the Confederacy, stringent financial conditions and

widely scattered population prevented relief efforts from being as

organized as those of the North. But charity had a deep-rooted meaning

for the Southern cause, and self-denial became a matter of pride. “We

had no Sanitary Commission in the South,” wrote one Confederate

veteran, “we were too poor.... With us each house was a hospital.”

The United States Sanitary Commission was established in April 1861.

It was originally designed for inquiry into the health of the troops

and as an advisory board to the government on improvement of sanitary

conditions in the army. In the early months of the war, the Sanitary

Commission attempted to methodize the fragmented benevolent efforts of

the Union. It fought favoritism to particular regiments with equitable

distribution of supplies, administered from a network of regional and

local auxiliaries. By 1863, however, the commission was, of necessity,

drawn to the battlefield, where it established hospital and transport

ships, supply stations, and gave direct aid to the wounded. Several

million dollars were raised by the commission through “Sanitary

Fairs,” large fund-raising bazaars. At one point the Sanitary

Commission had more than 500 agents working in the field. By its

impartiality and organization, the Sanitary Commission was the

forerunner of the Red Cross in concept, if not in actuality.

Another organization, drawn along similar lines, was the United States

Christian Commission. Established by a group of New York churches in

1862, its object was to “give relief and sympathy and then the

Gospel.” Volunteers in the Christian Commission were called

“Ambassadors of Jesus;” they were chosen largely from the ranks of

clergymen and YMCA members but many women were among its workers. The

Christian Commission did give battlefield relief, and sought to supply

reading material, clothing, and medicine.

“They would stand with you now, as they stood with you then,

The nurses, consolers and saviors of men."

_The Women Who Went to the Field_

[Illustration: Field hospital.]

Clara Barton was familiar with these organizations, and, especially in

the latter part of the war, often worked alongside them. But though

she wrote publicly that their labor was always in “perfect accord,

mutual respect and friendliness,” she chose to work alone rather than

align herself too closely with the commissions. Barton’s natural

leadership and difficulty in working with others prompted her to

remain independent, where she would not be “compromised by them in the

least.” Furthermore, she secretly scorned the commissions’ work, which

she thought inexperienced and impractical: “an old fudge” she called

the Sanitary Commission in her journal.

Barton also chose not to work with Dorothea Dix’s “Department of

Female Nurses.” A compulsive humanitarian worker, Dix had volunteered

her services to the War Department at the opening of hostilities. Her

offer was accepted and Dix began the impossible task of collecting

supplies, selecting nurses, and supervising hospitals for the Union

army. Dix was a perfectionist and her dogmatic and strident opinions

won her few friends. But her sharp altercations with physicians and

officers resulted more from frustration because she could not relieve

the massive misery, than from an over-bearing personality. Feeling

that she had failed to achieve her mission, Dix wrote at war’s end:

“This is not the work I would have my life judged by.”

The use of female nurses was an innovation during the Civil War and

Dix was anxious for the women under her to be taken seriously. Fearful

that nursing would become a sport among adventurous young women, she

laid down stringent and inflexible rules for nurses. These rules would

have greatly hampered Clara Barton’s independent spirit and this is

one reason she chose not to join Dix’s force.

In addition to the official organizations there were numerous “unsung

heroes” during the Civil War. Most notable were the religious orders

such as the Sisters of Charity who calmly defied the army’s

restrictions and worked both at the front and in hospitals. Despite

the fact that such diverse groups inevitably caused conflicts and

jealousies, the Civil War provided a field large enough for all of the

humanitarian organizations which labored in it.

[Illustration: _Mary Ann Bickerdyke_]

[Illustration: _Walt Whitman_]

While aiding others, Barton, for a time, forgot herself. Her “work and

words,” she insisted, were solely bound up in “the individual

soldier—what he does, sees, feels, or thinks in ... long dread hours of

leaden rain and iron hail.” As she gained self-confidence and acclaim,

she shed her morbid introspection. Once when she was asked if her work

had been interesting, she gave a revealing reply: “When you stand day

and night in the presence of hardship and physical suffering, you do not

stop to think about the interest. There is no time for that. Ease pain,

soothe sorrow, lessen suffering—this is your only thought day and night.

Everything, everything else is lost sight of—yourself and the world.”

In April 1863, Barton transferred her base from Washington to Hilton

Head Island off the coast of South Carolina. She had been advised that a

major siege of Charleston would be attempted and believed she could be

most useful there. She also hoped to be closer to her brothers: Stephen

lived behind Confederate lines in North Carolina, and David had been

sent by the army to Hilton Head in the early days of 1863.

During the eight-month siege of Charleston, she worked on the

battlefields of Morris Island and Fort Wagner and helped nurse soldiers

dying of malaria and other tropical fevers. Charleston proved to be a

less active spot than anticipated, however, and this fact, coupled with

a growing rift between Barton and hospital authorities, led her to leave

the area in January 1864. She returned to Washington, where she

continued to gather supplies as she awaited her next chance for service.

Her chance came in May 1864, when “the terrible slaughter of the

Wilderness and Spotsylvania turned all pitying hearts once more to

Fredericksburg.” Here she witnessed some of the most frightening scenes

she ever encountered. Fifty thousand men were killed or wounded in the

Wilderness Campaign. “I saw many things that I did not wish to see and I

pray God I may never see again,” she told a friend. Rain turned the red

clay soil of Virginia to deep mud, and hundreds of army wagons, crowded

full of wounded and suffering men, were stuck in a tremendous traffic

jam. “No hub of a wheel was in sight and you saw nothing of any animal

below its knees.”

She immediately set about feeding the men in the stalled wagons, but

another, more appalling situation arose. Some “heartless, unfaithful

officers” decided that it was, in fact, a hardship on the refined

citizens of Fredericksburg to be compelled to open their homes as

hospitals for “these dirty, lousy, common soldiers.” Always a champion

of the “army blue” against the “gold braid,” she hurried to Washington

to advise her friend Henry Wilson of the predicament. Wilson, chairman

of the Senate Military Affairs Committee, swiftly warned the War

Department. One day later the homes of Fredericksburg were opened to

Union soldiers. She returned to the battlefield with additional supplies

and continued to help the wounded. “When I rose, I wrung the blood from

the bottom of my clothing before I could step, for the weight about my

feet.”

After the Wilderness Campaign she served as a supervisor of nurses for

the Army of the James, under Gen. Benjamin F. Butler, until January

1865. She organized hospitals and nurses and administered day-to-day

activities in the invalid camps that received the wounded from Cold

Harbor, Petersburg, and other battles near Richmond. Many of these

soldiers remembered her thoughtfulness. If a wounded man requested

codfish cakes “in the old home way,” he most likely got them; a young

soldier, wasted to a skeleton, was tenderly cared for until his

relatives arrived to take him home; requests to have letters written

were never too much trouble.

[Illustration: _Throughout the Civil War Benjamin Butler (1818-93)

was a controversial figure as he invariably was at odds with the

national administration on the treatment of the civilian population

and the black slaves. Leaving the Army, he went into politics and

served in the U.S. Congress and one term as governor of

Massachusetts. It was as governor that he appointed Clara Barton

superintendent of the Women’s Reformatory at Sherborn._]

At the end of the Civil War an exhausted Clara Barton felt certain of

one thing: “I have labored up to the full measure of my strength.” And

she labored without pay and often used her own funds to buy supplies. In

the field she shared the conditions of the common soldier: “I have

always refused a tent unless the army had tents also, and I have never

eaten a mouthful ... until the sick of the army were abundantly

supplied.” Her pragmatic judgment and ability to work under the most

dangerous and awkward of conditions earned her the respect of surgeons

and generals who ordinarily considered they had “men enough to act as

nurses” and did not want women around to “skeddadle and create a panic.”

General Butler described her as having “executive ability and

kindheartedness, with an honest love of the work of reformation and care

of her living fellow creatures.”

Barton’s perceptive and sympathetic nature led her to foresee

innumerable social problems after the Civil War. A champion of the

underdog, she was concerned with the precarious situation of the newly

freed slaves. What she saw on her travels to the South was alarming:

uneducated, dependent blacks were being duped by their former masters,

and freedom was, in many cases, a burden, not a blessing. Few blacks

knew of the laws passed for their benefit and many did not understand

that they must continue to work. She observed that the former “owners

were disposed to cheat [a] great many.” Wherever she went, Barton tried

to explain the law and the meaning of freedom to the blacks, many of

whom walked great distances to ask her advice.

[Illustration: _Frederick Douglass (1817?-95) was born in Talbot

County, Maryland, the son of a white man and a slave woman. He was

an eloquent spokesman for American blacks before and after the Civil

War and spent his life fighting for equality. He was appointed U.S.

minister to Haiti in 1889._]

Barton, however, did more than advise. She consulted with Senator Wilson

about the best possible personnel for the Freedman’s Bureau and lobbied

Congress for a bill allowing blacks to use surplus army goods. She

attended meetings of the Freedman’s Aid Society and sent reports on

blacks’ conditions to the Freedman’s Bureau. She also worked for the

extension of suffrage through “Universal Franchise” meetings and the

American Equal Rights Association; she spoke at their rallies and formed

lifelong attachments with such prominent leaders as Frederick Douglass

and Anna Dickenson. During October of 1868, she began to formulate a

plan for helping “the colored sufferers.” The plan, modelled on the work

of Josephine Griffing, apparently involved the use of abandoned barracks

and former hospitals near Washington for “Industrial Houses.” Here

Freedmen could learn a trade and be “provided with the means of

self-support and so command the respect of [their] former masters.” She

discussed her ideas with several people, but unfortunately, the project

was dropped because of her failing health.

Barton remained a staunch ally of blacks during her lifetime. Blacks

employed by her received wages consistent with those of whites and

generally received additional training and education. When few other

charitable groups were willing to aid blacks who were the victims of

natural disasters, such as the storm that hit the Sea Islands of South

Carolina in 1893, Barton’s Red Cross never hesitated. And those who

denied the bravery or competence of black troops in the Civil or

Spanish-American Wars found her an outspoken opponent. Made honorary

president of a society honoring soldiers of the Spanish-American War,

she resigned when she found that it was open only to whites.

At the same time she was promoting the enfranchisement of freedmen, she

embarked on a project aimed at diminishing another major post-war

problem: the whereabouts of thousands of missing soldiers. She

appreciated the difficulty of keeping accurate records in the confusion

of battle and understood that it was often nearly impossible to

recognize the dead, or identify individual graves among the hastily dug

common trenches. Her wartime notebooks and diaries are filled with names

of missing and wounded soldiers and lists of those who died in her arms

with perhaps no one else to know their fate. With official permission

from President Lincoln, she devised a plan to identify missing soldiers

by publishing in newspapers monthly rolls of men whose families or

friends had inquired. Any person with information could write to her and

she would forward it to those concerned.

As she went about her work she learned that not everyone was willing to

be found. Soldiers who were attached to Southern sweethearts, who had

deserted, or who simply wished to start a new life, preferred to remain

missing. One young man wanted to know what he had done to have his name

“blazoned all over the country” in newspapers. “What you have done ... I

certainly _do not_ know,” she replied. “It seems to have been the

misfortune of your family to think more of you than you did of them, and

probably more than you deserve from the manner in which you treat

them.... I shall inform them of your existence lest you should not ‘see

fit’ to do so yourself.”

In all, Barton’s “Office of Correspondence with Friends of the Missing

Men of the United States Army” worked for four years to bring

information to more than 22,000 families. The most help she received

came from a young man named Dorence Atwater, a former Andersonville

prisoner. He fortuitously had copied the names of more than 13,000 men

who had died during his confinement. With his aid, she identified all

but 400 of the Andersonville graves and caused the camp to be made a

National Cemetery.

Atwater’s help was invaluable, and he became a close personal friend.

She was highly indignant when the Federal Government arrested Atwater on

charges that his death list was government property. Federal officials

claimed that he had “stolen” back the list after turning it over to the

War Department. The case appears to have been actually based on

confusion and a stubborn refusal of both sides to back down, but Clara

Barton was incensed. She fought for Atwater’s release with every

influential person she knew; she advised and prompted his statements

from prison and carried on a monumental publicity campaign to elicit

public sympathy. Largely because of her efforts, he was freed.

Atwater’s defense and her work with the missing men further developed

her publicity efforts, which she had used so effectively in the Civil

War. As time went on, her relief work relied more and more on public

support. “We enter a field of distress,” she wrote, “study conditions,

learn its needs, and state these facts calmly, and truthfully to the

people of the entire country through all its channels of information and

leave them free to use their own judgments in regard to the assistance

they will render.” Still, she knew how to publicize her causes

dramatically. In 1886, when a tornado struck Mount Vernon, Illinois, she

wrote: “the pitiless snow is falling on the heads of 3,000 people who

are without homes, without food, or clothing.” The response was

immediate.

Oral publicity also proved helpful during her attempt to identify

missing men. In 1866, she began a successful lecture tour that

publicized both her cause and her name. She gave lectures throughout the

North and West and was featured on tours with such prominent speakers as

Ralph Waldo Emerson, William Lloyd Garrison, and Mark Twain. Her talks

centered on “Work and Incidents of Army Life.” The flyer portrayed her

lectures as “exquisitely touching and deeply interesting, frequently

moving her audience to tears.” As always, she enjoyed the notoriety and

in her diary wrote a flattering description of herself at the lecturn:

“easy and graceful, neith[er] tall nor short, neith[er] large nor small

... head large and finely shaped with a profusion of jet-black hair ...

with no manner of ornament save its own glossy beauty.... She [is]

_well_ dressed.... Her voice ... at first low and sweet but falling upon

the ear with a clearness of tone and distinctness of utterance at once

surprising and entrancing.”

Although she enjoyed being in the limelight, many of her old

insecurities returned. “All speech-making terrifies me,” she said,

“first I have no taste for it, lastly I hate it.” In 1868, while

delivering a lecture in Boston, she suffered what was apparently a

nervous breakdown and was ordered by her doctors to recuperate in

Europe.

The periodic nervous disorders she suffered appear to have been directly

related to her sense of usefulness. When she was not working, her diary

entries often begin “Have been sad all day,” or “This was one of the

most down-spirited days that ever comes to me.” She once remarked that

nothing made her so sick of life as to feel she was wasting it. As long

as she was needed, admired, demanded, she could perform near miracles of

self-denial and courageous action. When the crisis ebbed, she became

despondent and sick, requiring attention of a different sort. As a

single woman, often removed from her family, she had no other way to

attract notice than to excel as an individual. When such an opportunity

faded, or when she found herself an object of criticism, she was, in

several senses, prostrated. When her interest was again aroused by the

chance of giving service, her health and spirits rebounded.

Battling for Ratification

[Illustration: _Jean-Henri Dunant_]

Clara Barton arrived in Great Britain in late August 1869 with no

definite plans. Her doctors had ordered rest and a change of scene. She

toured London, visited Paris, then proceeded to Geneva. She thought she

might stay in Switzerland, but the depressing fall weather changed her

mind; she moved to Corsica, seeking sun and wishing to visit the haunts

of her longtime hero, Napoleon I.

She was ill, edgy, and demanding. Corsica, although beautiful, did not

suit her and by March she was back in Geneva. Here, by chance, she was

introduced to Dr. Louis Appia, a member of the International Committee

of the Red Cross. This organization was the result of the Geneva

Convention of 1864, which produced a treaty dealing with the treatment

of wounded and sick soldiers, prisoners of war, and civilians under

wartime conditions. The convention was inspired by a book entitled _Un

Souvenir de Solferino_ (A Memory of Solferino), in which author

Jean-Henri Dunant described the horrors of the Battle of Solferino. At

the time of her meeting with Appia, she had not heard of the Geneva

Convention nor of Dunant. When she finally read Dunant’s work, she must

have identified strongly with it, for he expressed perfectly the concern

for the individual which had prompted Barton’s Civil War aid: “A son

idolized by his parents, brought up and cherished for years by a loving

mother who trembled with alarm over his slightest ailment; a brilliant

officer beloved by his family, with wife and children at home; a young

soldier who had left sweetheart or mother, sisters or old father to go

to war; all lie stretched in the mud and dust, drenched in their own

blood.”

At their first meeting, Appia asked Barton why the United States had not

signed the Treaty of Geneva. A U.S. delegate, Charles Bowles, had been

at the Geneva Convention, and Dr. Henry Bellows, president of the

Sanitary Commission, had urged the government to accede to the treaty.

But the United States remained the only major nation that had not

accepted the international pact. Barton said a key factor was probably

the American public’s almost total ignorance about the treaty, and she

asked Appia to provide her with further information about the

International Red Cross.

Barton soon found reason, in her words, “to respect the cause and

appreciate the work of the Geneva Convention.” On July 19, 1870, France

declared war on Prussia. She was restless and excited by hearing guns at

practice and wrote to Appia, offering her services to the Red Cross.

Before he could reply, however, she made her way to Basel, Switzerland,

where she worked with Red Cross volunteers making bandages. This tame

work exasperated her. “It is not like me, nor like my past to be sitting

quietly where I can just watch the sky reddening with the fires of a

bombarded city and ... have [nothing] to do with it.” Despite her

frustration, Barton’s work in Basel gave her great respect for the

garnering power of the Red Cross. Its warehouses were stocked with

supplies of all kinds, and trained nurses and clerks wearing Red Cross

armbands stood ready to assist. “I ... saw the work of these Red Cross

societies in the field, accomplishing in four months under this

systematic organization what we failed to accomplish in four years

without it—no mistakes, no needless suffering, no starving, no lack of

care, no waste, no confusion, but order, plenty, cleanliness, and

comfort wherever that little flag made its way, a whole continent

marshalled under the banner of the Red Cross—as I saw all this, and

joined and worked in it, you will not wonder that I said to myself, ‘If

I live to return to my country, I will try to make my people understand

the Red Cross and that treaty.’”

The opportunity to be useful and to forget petty irritants restored her

health. “I am so glad to be able to work once more,” she told her

cousin, Elvira Stone, “I _have_ worked ... all year, and grown stronger

and better.” She then made her way toward the battlefields of France

accompanied by Antoinette Margot, a young Swiss woman. On their way

toward Mulhouse, where several battles had been reported, they met

hundreds of refugees who pleaded with them to turn back. But when they

encountered trouble from German troops, Barton brought out a sewing kit

and speedily tacked a cross of red ribbon onto the sleeve of her dress.

Thus began her first service under the Red Cross badge, which she would

wear long and proudly.

[Illustration: _Napoleon III, Emperor of France_]

[Illustration: _Otto von Bismarck, Chancellor of Germany_]

[Illustration: _Wilhelm I, Emperor of Germany_]

Barton was disappointed to learn that she was not needed at the front,

but she found her niche elsewhere. As she traveled through France, she

wrote to newspaper editor Horace Greeley that she had seen deserted

fields, “crops spoiled ... by both friend and foe. Her producing

population stands under arms or wasting in prisons—her hungry cattle

slain for food or rotting of disease—her homes deserted or smouldering

in ashes.” When Louise, grand duchess of Baden and a Red Cross patron,

asked her to help establish hospitals and distribute clothing to

destitute civilians, she undertook the work with zeal.

Barton’s accomplishments during the Franco-Prussian War lay mainly in

aid to civilians. Her most notable work was in Strasbourg, where she

used her powers of organization and publicity to establish a sewing

center to clothe the city’s destitute population. In a letter to a

generous English philanthropist in May 1871, she wrote: “Thousands who

are well to-day will rot with smallpox and be devoured by body-lice

before the end of August. Against ... these two scourges there is, I

believe, no check but the destruction of all infected garments; hence

the imperative necessity for something to take their place. Excuse, sir,

I pray you, the plain ugly terms which I have employed to express

myself; the facts are plain and ugly.”

_Continues on page 40_

Jean-Henri Dunant and the Geneva Convention

On June 24, 1859, forces commanded by French Emperor Napoleon III and

Austria’s Emperor Franz Josef, met on the battlefield of Solferino, in

Northern Italy. More than 40,000 men were killed or wounded in the

battle, and towns and villages throughout the area became temporary,

crude hospitals. In nearby Castiglione, a stranger, dressed in white,

watched with horror as dazed and suffering soldiers were slowly

brought from the battlefield only to be met with a shortage of

doctors, inadequate accommodations, and an appalling lack of food and

supplies. With spirit and speed “the man in white” began to recruit

local peasants for volunteer service and to procure badly needed

bandages, water, and food.

The “man in white”—Jean-Henri Dunant—was not new to philanthropic

endeavors. Born in Geneva, Switzerland, in 1828, he came of a

well-to-do family with a strong religious background and a tradition

of public service. As a young man Dunant had been an instigator of the

movement that created the Young Men’s Christian Association (YMCA),

which he hoped would promote fellowship and understanding between

young men of many cultural backgrounds. Until the age of 30, Dunant

was a banker, with business interests throughout Europe and Northern

Africa. In June of 1859, these financial affairs took him to

Castiglione.

In a sense, Dunant never completely left Solferino. The many startling

scenes he witnessed there continued to crowd his mind. “What haunted

me,” wrote Dunant, “was the memory of the terrible condition of the

thousands of wounded.” This horrible remembrance of men dying, often

for want of the simplest care, inspired him to publish in 1862 a vivid

account of the battle and its consequences. The book was called _Un

Souvenir de Solferino_ (A Memory of Solferino).

The realistic descriptions, and the compassion for the individual

soldier shown in Dunant’s book created an immediate sensation in

Europe. _Un Souvenir de Solferino_ wasted little space on the

traditional “glories” of war; Dunant was more interested in the plight

of the “simple troopers ... [who] suffered without complaint ... [and]

... died humbly and quietly.” The book advocated a radically new

concept of charitable action: that all of the wounded, friend and foe

alike, should be cared for. He had been inspired, said Dunant, by the

Italian peasant women who murmured “tutti fratelli” (all are brothers)

while treating the hated Austrians. Near the end of the book was a

brief paragraph, destined to have dramatic impact on the humanitarian

efforts of the world: “Would it not be possible,” wrote Dunant, “in

time of peace and quiet, to form relief societies for the purpose of

having care given to the wounded in wartime of zealous, devoted and

thoroughly qualified volunteers?”

The simple question may have been overlooked by readers caught up in

the battle scenes of _Un Souvenir de Solferino_. But it caught the

imagination of one influential man: Gustav Moynier, a citizen of

Geneva who headed the charitable “Committee for the Public Benefit.”

Moynier introduced a practical direction to Dunant’s dreams. He

contacted Dunant, and together they established a committee, headed by

Moynier, and including the commanding general of the Swiss Army,

Guillaume Dufour. Two distinguished doctors, Louis Appia and Theodore

Maunoir, completed the “Committee of Five.” This committee immediately

began plans for an international convention to discuss the treatment

of the wounded in wartime.

In February 1863, 16 nations met in Geneva to discuss “the relief of

wounded armies in the field.” Dunant’s proposals were debated and an

informal list of agreements was drawn up. This agreement established

the national volunteer agencies for relief in war. Then, in August

1864 a second conference was held which produced the international

pact, known as the Treaty of Geneva. The treaty rendered “neutral and

immune from injury in war the sick and wounded and all who cared for

them.” To distinguish the neutral medical personnel, supplies and

sick, an international badge was needed. Out of respect for Dunant and

the country which had been host of the conventions, the design adopted

was that of the reversed Swiss flag. Those working under the Treaty of

Geneva would thereafter be recognized by the emblem of a red cross on

a white flag. The United States signed this treaty on March 16, 1882.

Jean-Henri Dunant’s generous dream had been fulfilled, but he obtained

no glory or recognition for many years. Dunant had neglected his

business interests while promoting the Geneva conventions. By 1867 he

was bankrupt and spent most of his remaining life a pauper.

However, Dunant did live to receive, jointly with Frederic Passy, the

first Nobel Peace Prize in 1901. It was a fitting tribute to the man

who, in the words of Gustav Moynier, “opened the eyes of the blind,

moved the hearts of the indifferent, and virtually effected in the

intellectual and moral realm the reformation to which [he] aspired.”

[Illustration: _In 1864, 11 European nations agreed to the terms of

the Treaty of Geneva, which established the Red Cross. This

painting, by Charles Edouard Armand-Demaresq, shows the ceremony of

signing the treaty._]

Barton did not confine her activity to Strasbourg. After eight months

work, she left her sewing establishment in the hands of local officials

and journeyed to Paris where she distributed clothing, money, and

comfort to citizens. From Paris she went to Lyons and surveyed the

surrounding countryside for a relief headquarters, finally settling in

Belfort. This small border town had heroically withstood Prussian fire

for more than eight months. The people were “very poor and their

ignorance ... something deplorable,” noted Antoinette Margot. Many of

the citizens had never seen paper money—so Barton used only coins—and

less than one in 15 could write his name. Her activities were still

loosely tied to the Red Cross, but in most cases she used her own

judgment to come to terms with the destitution she found. Money was

given according to need, solace indiscriminately. Desperate mobs often

stormed the home of “Monsieur l’Administrateur” in which she was

staying; assistant Margot was “amused ... to see Miss Barton _protecting

her policemen_” and pacifying the crowds with her dignified bearing and

calm admonition to “wait a little and be quiet.” Barton tried to help

the anxious families of prisoners who had lost their means of support

and provided some relief for the French leaving German-occupied Alsace.

Margot later remarked that she wished “that her own people could see

their country-woman at work among European poor as not one European has

done.”

When the hostilities between France and Prussia ended, and with it the

need for Barton’s help, her health again declined. Despite the

decorations of several governments, she was despondent. Her eyes gave

out, her nerves collapsed. She had over-taxed herself in

nerve-shattering situations, and she suffered, in part, because she had

never really learned to care for herself. Troubled throughout her life

by insomnia, she often worked on four or five hours sleep. A sometimes

vegetarian, she took no pains to correctly nourish herself; dinner was

too often a large red apple or nothing at all. It is understandable, in

the light of this negligence and spiritual decline, that she suffered a

relapse into her old nervous disorders.

[Illustration: _German soldiers rout French troops at Bazeilles,

France, during the Franco-Prussian War._]

For a time Barton stayed in Germany. She then traveled with friends

throughout Italy, a tour highlighted by a visit to Mt. Vesuvius. In May

1872, she visited the Riviera and traveled via Paris to London. Though

somewhat improved, she was still weak, and her restlessness increased

daily. She stayed in London for more than a year, made many friends,

enjoyed horse shows and Madame Tussaud’s, and took part in a congress on

prison reform. But all the time she pondered her fate, bemoaned the

sacrifice of her time, and let small incidents unduly rankle. For a

while she considered writing for newspapers, but she felt too listless.

Visits from a niece, from the grand duchess of Baden, who had become her

devoted friend, and from Antoinette Margot could not rouse her. Finally,

on September 30, 1873, she sailed on the _Parthia_ for the United

States, still worried and uncertain about her future. “Have ye place,

each beloved one, a place in your prayer,” she plaintively asked in a

poem written aboard the _Parthia_, “Have ye work, my brave countrymen,

work for me there?”

Barton hoped to recover her spirits in America. Unfortunately, only a

few months after her return, she received word that her sister, Sally,

was critically ill. She hurried from Washington, D.C., to Oxford,

Massachusetts, only to find that Sally’s death had preceded her arrival

by hours. This blow was devastating; she collapsed utterly. A year

later, still shaky and depressed, she faced the death of Henry Wilson,

her political ally and close friend.

Barton was in serious need of a restful atmosphere. Through a young

woman in Worcester she learned of a sanitarium at Dansville, New York,

where the patients were treated with a popular “water cure.” There she

found “congenial society, wholesome and simple food, and an atmosphere

that believed health to be possible.” Her health did indeed improve at

Dansville. She eventually bought a house there, and made the small town

her home for the next ten years. She participated in plays, attended and

gave lectures, went on outings with other patients, and enjoyed her

position as the town’s most celebrated citizen. And, after one of her

lectures, she met one of the most influential people in her life: Julian

Hubbell, a young chemistry teacher at Dansville Seminary. They became

friends, and when she told him of the Treaty of Geneva and how she hoped

for its adoption in the United States, Hubbell asked what he could do to

help. “Get a degree in medicine,” she advised, and Hubbell complied. He

left his teaching position and entered the University of Michigan

medical school in 1878.

Julian Hubbell remained uncompromisingly loyal to Barton. When the

American Red Cross was established, he became its chief field agent. As

such he participated in more actual relief work than she did. His

skillful organization and quiet control were directly responsible for

much of the success of the early Red Cross. Upon her resignation, he too

gave up his career.

[Illustration: _During the Civil War Henry Bellows (1814-82) founded

and served as president of the United States Sanitary Commission. He

had graduated from Harvard University at the age of 18 and five

years later from Harvard Divinity School. He worked first in

Louisiana and Alabama, but his career began in earnest when he

became pastor of New York City’s Unitarian Church of All Souls.

Throughout his life, he was known as an inspirer of people._]

In the late 1870s, Barton began to be active again in political affairs.

Her long interest in women’s rights was re-kindled, especially by

Harriet Austin, a doctor at the sanitarium. For a time, Barton adopted

the mode of Austin’s dress reform—loose, corsetless garments, which

included baggy trousers. It pleased her to “shed flannels” and dress

“just as free and easy as a gentleman, with lots of pockets, and

perambulate around to suit herself.” In 1876 she advocated a series of

dress reform meetings and helped Susan B. Anthony compile biographies of

noted women. In 1878, she participated in suffrage conventions in

Washington, D.C., and Rochester, New York.

As Barton’s health improved she also renewed her interest in

establishing the Red Cross in the United States. She knew that her first

step was to obtain the official sanction of the International Red Cross

Committee and spent much of 1877 and 1878 corresponding with Dr. Louis

Appia about a plan for promoting the Red Cross. Always jealous of her

position as sole representative of the cause, Barton was not above

discrediting both Charles Bowles and Henry Bellows, early advocates of

the Red Cross in America. Bowles is “utterly unreliable ... and ...

never worthy of confidence,” Barton wrote to Appia, and Bellows “wears

[his title of representative] as an easy honor, and it never occurs to

him that he is retarding the progress of the world.” Neither allegation

was true. But Barton gained the official blessing of the international

committee, and as their representative began her crusade for

ratification of the Treaty of Geneva.

Her first concern was to educate the public, for she had found that “the

knowledge of [the] society and its great objects in this country ... is

almost unknown, and the Red Cross in America is a mystery.” In 1878, she

published a small pamphlet entitled “What the Red Cross Is.” She

realized that the American public did not expect to be engaged in

another war and emphasized peacetime uses of the Red Cross. Red Cross

action against natural disasters had actually been proposed by Henri

Dunant in the third edition of _Un Souvenir de Solferino_, but in her

pamphlet she gave it priority. “To afford ready succor and assistance in

time of national or widespread calamities, to gather and dispense the

profuse liberality of our people, without waste of time or material,

requires the wisdom that comes of experience and permanent

organization.”

[Illustration: _Frances Dana Gage (1808-84) found time while raising

eight children to write and speak on temperance, slavery, and

women’s rights. Her anti-slavery activities in Missouri met with a

hostile reception. During the Civil War she helped former slaves

adjust to freedom. In her later years she wrote children’s

stories._]

Barton also began mentioning the Treaty of Geneva in occasional lectures

to veterans and local citizens. She wrote persuasively to influential

friends, such as Benjamin F. Butler, and former minister to France Elihu

B. Washburne. “I am not only a patriotic but a proud woman,” she told

Washburne, “and our position on this matter is a subject of

mortification to me. I am humbled to see the United States stand with

the barbarous nations of the world, outside the pale of civilization.”

Other friends, among them Frances Dana Gage and Mrs. Hannah Shepard,

wrote articles advocating establishment of the Red Cross. Barton labored

many hours to translate, write, and explain materials on the Red Cross

to influential men in New York and Washington.

The same year, 1878, she presented information concerning the Red Cross

to President Rutherford B. Hayes. She also delivered an invitation to

the United States from International Red Cross president Gustav Moynier

to join the association. But she found little enthusiasm in the Hayes

administration. A fear of “entangling alliances” with other countries

still prevailed and the State Department shied away from permanent

treaties. Furthermore, the treaty had previously been submitted by Dr.

Bellows, and the Grant Administration had rejected it. Hayes considered

the subject closed.

When a Congressional joint resolution to ratify the Treaty of Geneva was

tabled early in 1879, she shelved her own plans for a while, traveled

between New York State and Washington, D.C., lectured some, and

entertained relatives at her Dansville home. But she remained alert for

an opportunity, and when James A. Garfield ran for President in 1880,

she campaigned in his behalf. With his election that November, she hoped

for a more sympathetic administration. To her relief, she found both

Garfield and Secretary of State James Blaine interested. Plans were made

to submit the treaty to the Senate for ratification, and she continued

to lobby senators.

In June 1881, with success in sight, Barton and a few friends formed the

first American Association of the Red Cross. She was elected president,

an office she originally planned to keep only until the Treaty of Geneva

was signed. The organization’s main purpose at this stage was to promote

adoption of the treaty, without which the body had no international

authority or recognition. The first local chapter of the American Red

Cross, and the first to give actual aid, was established at Dansville,

New York, in August 1881.

Clara Barton National Historic Site, Maryland · 第 3 / 4 章