CHAPTER II.

ASSYRIAN HISTORY.

Assyrian history, as we have seen, begins with the _patesis_ or viceroys

of the city of Assur. We know little about them except their names;

contemporaneous annals do not commence until Assyria has ceased to be

the dependency of a foreign power, and has become an independent

kingdom. It was in the 17th or 16th century before the Christian era

that Bel-kapkapi first gave himself the title of king. For two or three

centuries afterwards our chief information about the monarchy he founded

is derived from the relations, sometimes hostile and sometimes

peaceable, which his successors had with Babylonia. One of them,

however, Rimmon-nirari I by name (about B.C. 1320), has left us an

inscription in which he recounts the wars he waged against the

Babylonians, the Kurds, the Aramæans, and the Shuites, nomad tribes who

extended along the western bank of the Euphrates. It was his son,

Shalmaneser I, to whom the foundation of Calah is ascribed. For six

generations his descendants followed one another on the throne; then

came Tiglath-Pileser I, who may be regarded as the founder of the first

Assyrian Empire. He carried his arms as far as Cilicia and Malatiyeh on

the west, and the wild tribes of Kurdistan on the east; he overthrew the

Moschi or Meshech, defeated the Hittites and their Colchian allies, and

erected a memorial of his conquests at the sources of the Tigris. The

Hittite city of Pethor, at the junction of the Euphrates and Sajur, was

garrisoned with Assyrian soldiers, and at Arvad the Assyrian monarch

symbolised his subjection of the Mediterranean by embarking in a ship

and killing a dolphin in the sea. In Nineveh he established a botanical

garden, which he filled with the strange trees he had brought back with

him from his campaigns. In B.C. 1130 he marched into Babylonia, and,

after a momentary repulse at the hands of the Babylonian king, defeated

his antagonists on the banks of the Lower Zab. Babylonia was ravaged,

and Babylon itself was captured.

With the death of Tiglath-Pileser I, Assyrian history becomes for awhile

obscure. The sceptre fell into feeble hands, and the distant conquests

of the empire were lost. It was during this period of abeyance that the

kingdom of David and Solomon arose in the west. The Assyrian power did

not revive until the reign of Assur-dân II, whose son, Rimmon-nirari II

(B.C. 911-889), and great-grandson, Assur-natsir-pal (B.C. 883-858), led

their desolating armies through Western Asia, and made the name of

Assyria once more terrible to the nations around them. Assur-natsir-pal

was at once one of the most ferocious and most energetic of the

Assyrian kings. His track was marked by impalements, by pyramids of

human heads, and by other barbarities too horrible to be described. But

his campaigns reached further than those of Tiglath-Pileser had done.

Armenia, Mesopotamia, and Kurdistan, were overrun again and again; the

Babylonians were forced to sue for peace; Sangara, the Hittite king of

Carchemish, paid tribute, and the rich cities of Phœnicia poured their

offerings into the treasury of Nineveh. The armies of Assyria penetrated

even to Nizir, where the ark of the Chaldæan Noah was believed to have

rested on the peak of Rowandiz. In Assyria itself the cities were

embellished with the spoils of foreign conquest; splendid palaces were

erected, and Calah, which had fallen into decay, was restored. A library

was erected there, and it became the favourite residence of

Assur-natsir-pal.

He was succeeded by his son Shalmaneser II, so named, perhaps, after the

original founder of Calah. Shalmaneser's military successes exceeded

even those of his father, and his long reign of thirty-five years marks

the climax of the first Assyrian Empire. His annals are chiefly to be

found engraved on three monuments now in the British Museum. One of

these is a monolith from Kurkh, a place about twenty miles from

Diarbekr. The full-length figure of Shalmaneser is sculptured upon it,

and the surface of the stone is covered with the inscription. Another

monument is a small 'obelisk' of polished black stone, the upper part of

which is shaped like three ascending steps. Inscriptions run round its

four sides, as well as small bas-reliefs representing the tribute

offered to 'the great king' by foreign states. Among the tribute-bearers

are the Israelitish subjects of 'Jehu, son of Omri.' The third monument

is one which was discovered in 1878 at Balawât, about nine miles from

Nimrûd or Calah. It consists of the bronze framework of two colossal

doors, of rectangular shape, twenty-two feet high and twenty-six feet

broad. The doors opened into a temple, and were made of wood, to which

the bronze was fastened by means of nails. The bronze was cut into

bands, which ran in a horizontal direction across the doors, and were

each divided into two lines of embossed reliefs. These reliefs were

hammered out, and not cast, and the rudeness of their execution proves

that they were the work of native artists, and not of the Phœnician

settlers in Nineveh, of whose skill in such work we have several

specimens. Short texts are added to explain the reliefs, so that the

various campaigns and cities represented in them can all be identified.

Among the cities is the Hittite capital Carchemish, and the warriors of

Armenia are depicted in a costume strikingly similar to that of the

ancient Greeks.

Shalmaneser's first campaign was against the restless tribes of

Kurdistan. He then turned northward, and fell upon the Armenian king of

Van and the Mannâ or Minni (see Jer. li. 27), who inhabited the country

between the mountains of Kotûr and Lake Urumiyeh. The Hittites of

Carchemish, with their allies from Cilicia and other neighbouring

districts, were next compelled to sue for peace, and the acquisition of

Pethor, which had been lost after Tiglath-Pileser's death, again gave

the Assyrians the command of the ford over the Euphrates. The result of

this was, that in B.C. 854 Shalmaneser came into conflict with the

kingdom of Hamath. The common danger had roused Hadadezer of Damascus,

called Benhaded II in the Bible, to make common cause with Hamath, and a

confederacy was formed to resist the Assyrian advance. Among the

confederates 'Ahab of Israel' is mentioned as furnishing the allies with

2,000 chariots and 10,000 infantry. But the confederacy was shattered at

Karkar or Aroer, although Shalmaneser had himself suffered too severely

to be able to follow up his victory. For a time, therefore, Syria

remained unmolested, and the Assyrian king turned his attention to

Babylonia, which he reduced to a state of vassalage, under the pretext

of assisting the Babylonian sovereign against his rebel brother.

Twelve years, however, after the battle of Karkar, Shalmaneser was once

more in the west. Hadadezer had been succeeded by Hazael on the throne

of Damascus, and it was against him that the full flood of Assyrian

power was turned. For some time he managed to stem it, but in B.C. 841

he suffered a crushing defeat on the heights of Shenir (see Deut. iii.

9), and his camp, along with 1,121 chariots and 470 carriages, fell into

the hands of the Assyrians, who proceeded to besiege him in his capital,

Damascus. The siege, however, was soon raised, and Shalmaneser

contented himself with ravaging the Hauran and marching to Beyrout,

where his image was carved on the rocky promontory of Baal-rosh, at the

mouth of the Nahr el-Kelb. It was while he was in this neighbourhood

that the ambassadors of Jehu arrived with offers of tribute and

submission. The tribute, we are told, consisted of 'silver, gold, a

golden bowl, vessels of gold, goblets of gold, pitchers of gold, a

sceptre for the king's hand and spear-handles,' and Jehu is erroneously

entitled 'the son of Omri.'

After the defeat of Hazael Shalmaneser's expeditions were only to

distant regions like Phœnicia, Kappadokia, and Armenia, for the sake of

exacting tribute. No further attempt was made at permanent conquest, and

after B.C. 834 the old king ceased to lead his armies in person, the

tartan or commander-in-chief taking his place. Not long afterwards a

revolt broke out headed by his eldest son, who seems to have thought

that he would have little difficulty in wresting the sceptre from the

hands of the enfeebled king. Twenty-seven cities, including Nineveh and

Assur, joined the revolt, which was, however, finally put down by the

energy and military capacity of Shalmaneser's second son Samas-Rimmon,

who succeeded him soon afterwards (B.C. 823-810). On his death he was

followed by his son Rimmon-nirari III (810-781), who compelled Mariha of

Damascus to pay him tribute, as well as the Phœnicians, Israelites,

Edomites, and Philistines. But the vigour of the dynasty was beginning

to fail. A few short reigns followed that of Rimmon-nirari, during

which the first Assyrian Empire melted away. A formidable power arose in

Armenia, the Assyrian armies were driven to the frontiers of their own

country, and disaffection began to prevail in Assyria itself. At length,

on the 15th of June, B.C. 763, an eclipse of the sun took place, and the

city of Assur rose in revolt. The revolt lasted three years, and before

it could be crushed the outlying provinces were lost. When Assur-nirari,

the last of his line, ascended the throne in B.C. 753, the empire was

already gone, and the Assyrian cities themselves were surging with

discontent. Ten years later the final blow was struck; the army declared

itself against their monarch, and he and his dynasty fell together. On

the 30th of Iyyar of the year B.C. 745, a military adventurer, Pul,

seized the vacant crown, and assumed the venerable name of

Tiglath-Pileser.

If we may believe Greek tradition, Tiglath-Pileser II began life as a

gardener. Whatever might have been his origin, however, he proved to be

a capable ruler, a good general, and a far-sighted administrator. He was

the founder of the second Assyrian Empire, which differed essentially

from the first. The first empire was at best a loosely-connected

military organization; campaigns were made into distant countries for

the sake of plunder and tribute, but little effort was made to retain

the districts that had been conquered. Almost as soon as the Assyrian

armies were out of sight, the conquered nations shook off the Assyrian

yoke, and it was only in regions bordering on Assyria that garrisons

were left by the Assyrian king. And whenever the Assyrian throne was

occupied by a weak or unwarlike prince, even these were soon destroyed

or forced to retreat homewards. Tiglath-Pileser II, however,

consolidated and organised the conquests he made; turbulent populations

were deported from their old homes, and the empire was divided into

satrapies or provinces, each of which paid a fixed annual tribute to the

imperial exchequer. For the first time in history the principle of

centralisation was carried out on a large scale, and a bureaucracy began

to take the place of the old feudal nobility of Assyria. But the second

Assyrian Empire was not only an organised and bureaucratic one, it was

also commercial. In carrying out his schemes of conquest Tiglath-Pileser

II was influenced by considerations of trade. His chief object was to

divert the commerce of Western Asia into Assyrian hands. For this

purpose every effort was made to unite Babylonia with Assyria, to

overthrow the Hittites of Carchemish, who held the trade of Asia Minor,

as well as the high road to the west, and to render Syria and the

Phœnician cities tributary. The policy inaugurated by Tiglath-Pileser

was successfully followed up by his successors.

Babylonia was the first to feel the results of the change of dynasty at

Nineveh. The northern part of it was annexed to Assyria, and secured by

a chain of fortresses. Tiglath-Pileser now attacked the Kurdish tribes,

who were constantly harassing the eastern frontier of the kingdom, and

chastised them severely, the Assyrian army forcing its way through the

fastnesses of the Kurdish mountains into the very heart of Media. But

Ararat, or Armenia, was still a dangerous neighbour, and accordingly

Tiglath-Pileser's next campaign was against a confederacy of the nations

of the north headed by Sarduris of Van. The confederacy was utterly

defeated in Kommagênê, 72,950 prisoners falling into the hands of the

Assyrians, and the way was opened into Syria. In B.C. 742 the siege of

Arpad (now Tel Erfâd) began, and lasted two years. Its fall brought with

it the submission of Northern Syria, and it was next the turn of Hamath

to be attacked. Hamath was in alliance with Uzziah of Judah, and its

king Eniel may have been of Jewish extraction. But the alliance availed

nothing. Hamath was taken by storm, part of its population transported

to Armenia, and their places taken by colonists from distant provinces

of the empire, while nineteen of the districts belonging to it were

annexed to Assyria. The kings of Syria now flocked to render homage and

offer tribute to the Assyrian conqueror. Among them we read the names of

Menahem of Samaria, Rezon of Syria, Hiram of Tyre, and Pisiris of

Carchemish. This was the occasion when, as we learn from 2 Kings xv. 19,

Menahem gave a thousand talents of silver to the Assyrian king Pul, the

name under which Tiglath-Pileser continued to be known in Babylonia,

and, as the Old Testament informs us, in Palestine also.

Three years later Ararat was again invaded. Van, the capital, was

blockaded, and though it successfully resisted the Assyrians, the

country was devastated far and near for a space of 450 miles. It was

long before the Armenians recovered from the blow, and for the next

century they ceased to be formidable to Assyria. Tiglath-Pileser's

northern frontier was now secure, and he therefore gladly seized the

opportunity of interfering in the affairs of the west which was offered

him by Ahaz, the Jewish king. Ahaz, whom the Assyrian inscriptions call

Jehoahaz, had been hard pressed by Rezon of Damascus and Pekah of

Israel, who had combined to overthrow the Davidic dynasty and place a

vassal prince, 'the son of Tabeal,' on the throne of Jerusalem. Ahaz in

his extremity called in the aid of Tiglath-Pileser, offering him a heavy

bribe and acknowledging his supremacy. Tiglath-Pileser accordingly

marched into Syria; Rezon was utterly defeated in battle and then

besieged in Damascus, to which he had escaped. Damascus was closely

invested; the trees in its neighbourhood were cut down; the districts

dependent on it were ravaged, and forces were despatched to punish the

Israelites, Ammonites, Moabites, and Philistines, who had been the

allies of Rezon, Gilead and Abel-beth-maachah being burnt, and the

tribes beyond the Jordan carried into captivity. The Philistine cities

were compelled to open their gates; the king of Ashkelon committed

suicide in order not to fall into the hands of the enemy, and Khanun of

Gaza fled to Egypt. At last in B.C. 732, after a siege of two years,

Damascus was forced by famine to surrender. Rezon was slain, Damascus

given over to plunder and ruin, and its inhabitants transported to Kir.

Syria became an Assyrian province, and all its princes were summoned to

do homage to the conqueror, while Tyre was fined 150 talents of gold, or

about £400,000. Among the princes who attended the levée or 'durbar' was

Ahaz, and it was while he was attending it that he saw the altar of

which he sent a pattern to Urijah the priest (2 Kings xvi. 10).

All that now remained for Tiglath-Pileser to do was to reduce Babylonia

as he had reduced Syria. In B.C. 731, accordingly, he marched again into

Chaldæa. Ukin-ziru, the Babylonian king, was slain, Babylon and other

great cities were taken, and in B.C. 729, under his original name of

Pul, Tiglath-Pileser assumed the title of 'king of Sumer (Shinar) and

Accad.'

He lived only two years after this, and died in B.C. 727, when the crown

was seized by Elulæos of Tinu, who took the name of Shalmaneser IV.

Shalmaneser's short reign was signalised by an unsuccessful attempt to

capture Tyre, and by the beginning of a war against the kingdom of

Israel. But the siege of Samaria was hardly commenced when Shalmaneser

died, or was murdered, in B.C. 722, and was succeeded by another usurper

who assumed the name of Sargon, one of the most famous of the early

Babylonian kings. Sargon in his inscriptions claims royal descent, but

the claim was probably without foundation. He proved to be an able

general, though his inscriptions show that he continued to the last to

be a rough but energetic soldier who had perhaps risen from the ranks.

Two years after his accession (B.C. 720) Samaria was taken and placed

under an Assyrian governor, 27,280 of its leading inhabitants being

carried captive to Gozan and Media. But Sargon soon found that the task

of cementing and completing the empire founded by Tiglath-Pileser was by

no means an easy one. Babylonia had broken away from Assyria on the news

of Shalmaneser's death, and had submitted itself to Merodach-Baladan the

hereditary chieftain of Beth-Yagina in the marshes on the coast of the

Persian Gulf. The southern portion of Sargon's dominions was threatened

by the ancient and powerful kingdom of Elam; the Kurdish tribes on the

east renewed their depredations; while the Hittite kingdom of Carchemish

still remained unsubdued, and the Syrian conquests could with difficulty

be retained. In fact, a new enemy appeared in this part of the empire in

the shape of Egypt.

Sargon's first act, therefore, was to drive the Elamites back to their

own country with considerable loss. He was then recalled to the west by

the revolt of Hamath, where Yahu-bihdi, or Ilu-bihdi, whose name perhaps

indicates his Jewish parentage, had proclaimed himself king, and

persuaded Arpad, Damascus, Samaria, and other cities to follow his

standard. But the revolt was of short duration. Hamath was burnt, 4,300

Assyrians being sent to occupy its ruins, and Yahu-bihdi was flayed

alive. Sargon next marched along the sea-coast to the cities of the

Philistines. There the Egyptian army was routed at Raphia, and its ally,

Khanun of Gaza, taken captive.

In B.C. 717 all was ready for dealing the final blow at the Hittite

power in Northern Syria. The rich trading city of Carchemish was

stormed, its last king, Pisiris, fell into the hands of the Assyrians,

and his Moschian allies were forced to retreat to the north. The plunder

of Carchemish brought eleven talents and thirty manehs of gold and 2,100

talents of silver into the treasury of Calah. It was henceforth placed

under an Assyrian satrap, who thus held in his hands the key of the high

road and the caravan trade between Eastern and Western Asia.

But Sargon was not allowed to retain possession of Carchemish without a

struggle. Its Hittite inhabitants found avengers in the allied

populations of the north, in Meshech and Tubal, in Ararat and Minni. The

struggle lasted for six years, but in the end Sargon prevailed. Van

submitted, its king Ursa, the leader of the coalition against Assyria,

committed suicide, Cilicia and the Tibareni or Tubal were placed under

an Assyrian governor, and the city of Malatiyeh was razed to the ground.

In B.C. 711, Sargon was at length free to turn his attention to the

west. Here affairs wore a threatening aspect. Merodach-Baladan,

foreseeing that his own turn would come as soon as Sargon had firmly

established his power in Northern Syria, had despatched ambassadors to

the Mediterranean states, urging them to combine with him against the

common foe. We read in the Bible of the arrival of the Babylonian

embassy in Jerusalem, and of the rebuke received by Hezekiah for his

vainglory in displaying to the strangers the resources of his kingdom.

In spite of Isaiah's warning, Hezekiah listened to the persuasions of

the Babylonian envoys, and encouraged by the promise of Egyptian support

along with Phœnicia, Moab, Edom, and the Philistines, determined to defy

the Assyrian king.

But before the confederates were ready to act in concert Sargon

descended upon Palestine. Phœnicia and Judah were overrun, Jerusalem was

captured, and Ashdod burnt, while the Egyptians made no attempt to help

their friends. This siege of Ashdod is the only occasion on which the

name of Sargon occurs in the Bible (Isaiah xx. 1). As soon as all source

of danger was removed in the west Sargon hurled his forces against

Babylonia. Merodach-Baladan had made every preparation to meet the

coming attack, and the Elamite king had engaged to help him. But the

Elamites were again compelled to fly before the warriors of Assyria, and

Sargon entered Babylon in triumph (B.C. 710). The following year he

pursued Merodach-Baladan to his ancestral stronghold in the marshes;

Beth-Yagina was taken by storm, and its unfortunate defenders were sent

in chains to Nineveh. Sargon was now at the height of his power. His

empire was a compact and consolidated whole, reaching from the

Mediterranean on the west to the mountains of Elam on the east, and his

solemn coronation at Babylon gave a title to his claim to be the

legitimate successor of the ancient Sargon of Accad. The old kingdoms of

Elam and Egypt alone remained to threaten the newly-founded empire,

which received the voluntary homage of the smaller states that lay

immediately beyond it. Thus the sacred island of Dilvun in the Persian

Gulf submitted itself to the terrible conqueror, and the Phœnicians of

Kition or Chittim in Cyprus erected a monumental record of his

supremacy.

Sargon's end was consonant with his whole career. He was murdered by his

soldiers in his new city of Dur-Sargon or Khorsabad, on the 12th of Ab

or July, B.C. 705, and was succeeded by his son Sennacherib. If we may

judge from Sennacherib's name, which means 'the Moon-god has increased

the brothers,' he would not have been Sargon's eldest son. In any case

he had been brought up in the purple, and displayed none of the rugged

virtues of his father. He was weak, boastful, and cruel, and preserved

his empire only by the help of the veterans and generals whom Sargon had

trained.

Merodach-Baladan had escaped from captivity, and two years after the

death of Sargon had once more possessed himself of Babylon. But a battle

at Kis drove him from the country nine months subsequently, and

Sennacherib was able to turn his attention to affairs in the west. In

B.C. 701, he marched into Phœnicia and Palestine, where Hezekiah of

Judah and some of the neighbouring kings had refused their tribute.

Tirhakah, the Ethiopian king of Egypt, had promised support to the

rebellious states, and Padi, the king of Ekron, who remained faithful to

the Assyrians, was carried in chains to Jerusalem. The Assyrian army

fell first upon Phœnicia. Great and Little Sidon, Sarepta, Acre, and

other towns, surrendered, Elulæos, the Sidonian monarch, fled to Cyprus,

and the kings of Arvad and Gebal offered homage. Metinti of Ashdod,

Pedael of Ammon, Chemosh-nadab of Moab, and Melech-ram of Edom, also

submitted. Then, says Sennacherib: 'Zedekiah, king of Ashkelon, who had

not submitted to my yoke, himself, the gods of the house of his fathers,

his wife, his sons, his daughters, and his brothers, the seed of the

house of his fathers, I removed, and I sent him to Syria. I set over the

men of Ashkelon Sarludari, the son of Rukipti, their former king, and I

imposed upon him the payment of tribute, and the homage due to my

majesty, and he became a vassal. In the course of my campaign I

approached and captured Beth-Dagon, Joppa, Bene-berak, and Azur, the

cities of Zedekiah, which did not submit at once to my yoke, and I

carried away their spoil. The priests, the chief men, and the common

people of Ekron who had thrown into chains their king Padi because he

was faithful to his oaths to Assyria, and had given him up to Hezekiah,

the Jew, who imprisoned him like an enemy in a dark dungeon, feared in

their hearts. The king of Egypt, the bowmen, the chariots, and the

horses of the king of Ethiopia, had gathered together innumerable

forces, and gone to their assistance. In sight of the town of Eltekeh

was their order of battle drawn up; they called their troops (to the

battle). Trusting in Assur, my lord, I fought with them and overthrew

them. My hands took the captains of the chariots, and the sons of the

king of Egypt, as well as the captains of the chariots of the king of

Ethiopia, alive in the midst of the battle. I approached and captured

the towns of Eltekeh and Timnath, and I carried away their spoil. I

marched against the city of Ekron, and put to death the priests and the

chief men who had committed the sin (of rebellion), and I hung up their

bodies on stakes all round the city. The citizens who had done wrong and

wickedness I counted as a spoil; as for the rest of them who had done no

sin or crime, in whom no fault was found, I proclaimed a free pardon. I

had Padi, their king, brought out from the midst of Jerusalem, and I

seated him on the throne of royalty over them, and I laid upon him the

tribute due to my majesty. But as for Hezekiah of Judah, who had not

submitted to my yoke, forty-six of his strong cities, together with

innumerable fortresses and small towns which depended on them, by

overthrowing the walls and open attack, by battle engines and

battering-rams, I besieged, I captured, I brought out from the midst of

them and counted as a spoil 200,150 persons, great and small, male and

female, horses, mules, asses, camels, oxen and sheep without number.

Hezekiah himself I shut up like a bird in a cage in Jerusalem, his royal

city. I built a line of forts against him, and I kept back his heel from

going forth out of the great gate of his city. I cut off his cities that

I had spoiled from the midst of his land, and gave them to Metinti, king

of Ashdod, Padi, king of Ekron, and Zil-baal, king of Gaza, and I made

his country small. In addition to their former tribute and yearly gifts,

I added other tribute, and the homage due to my majesty, and I laid it

upon them. The fear of the greatness of my majesty overwhelmed him, even

Hezekiah, and he sent after me to Nineveh, my royal city, by way of gift

and tribute, the Arabs and his body-guard whom he had brought for the

defence of Jerusalem, his royal city, and had furnished with pay, along

with thirty talents of gold, 800 talents of pure silver, carbuncles and

other precious stones, a couch of ivory, thrones of ivory, an elephant's

hide, an elephant's tusk, rare woods of various names, a vast treasure,

as well as the eunuchs of his palace, dancing-men and dancing-women; and

he sent his ambassador to offer homage.'

In this account of his campaign Sennacherib discreetly says nothing

about the disaster which befell his army in front of Jerusalem, and

which obliged him to return ignominiously to Assyria without attempting

to capture Jerusalem, and to deal with Hezekiah as it was his custom to

deal with other rebellious kings. The tribute offered by Hezekiah at

Lachish, when he vainly tried to buy off the threatened Assyrian attack,

is represented as having been the final result of a successful campaign.

There is, however, no exaggeration in the amount of silver Sennacherib

claims to have received, since 800 talents of silver are equivalent to

the 500 talents stated by the Bible to have been given, when reckoned

according to the standard of value in use at the time in Nineveh.

Sennacherib never recovered from the blow he had suffered in Judah. He

made no more expeditions against Palestine, and during the rest of his

reign Judah remained unmolested. Babylonia, moreover, gave him constant

trouble. In the year after his campaign in the west (B.C. 700) a

Chaldean, named Nergal-yusezib, stirred up a revolt which Sennacherib

had some difficulty in suppressing. Two years later he appointed his

eldest son, Assur-nadin-sumi, viceroy of Babylon. In B.C. 694, he

determined to attack the followers of Merodach-Baladan in their last

retreat at the mouth of the Eulæus, where land had been given to them by

the Elamite king after their expulsion from Babylonia. Ships were built

and manned by Phœnicians in the Persian Gulf, by means of which the

settlements of the Chaldean refugees were burnt and destroyed.

Meanwhile, however, Babylonia itself was invaded by the Elamites; the

Assyrian viceroy was carried into captivity, and Nergal-yusezib placed

on the throne of the country. He defeated the Assyrian forces in a

battle near Nipur, but died soon afterwards, and was followed by

Musezib-Merodach, who like his predecessor is called Suzub in

Sennacherib's inscriptions. He defied the Assyrian power for nearly four

years. But in B.C. 690 the combined Babylonian and Elamite army was

overthrown in the decisive battle of Khalule, and before another year

was past Sennacherib had captured Babylon, and given it up to fire and

sword. Its inhabitants were sold into slavery, and the waters of the

Araxes canal allowed to flow over its ruins. Sennacherib now assumed the

title of king of Babylonia, but with the exception of a campaign into

the Cilician mountains he seems to have undertaken no more military

expeditions. The latter years of his life were passed in constructing

canals and aqueducts, in embanking the Tigris, and in rebuilding the

palace of Nineveh on a new and sumptuous scale. On the 20th of Tebet, or

December, B.C. 681, he was murdered by his two elder sons, Adrammelech

and Nergal-sharezer, who were jealous of the favour shown to their

younger brother, Esar-haddon.

Esar-haddon was at the time conducting a campaign against Erimenas, king

of Armenia, to whom his insurgent brothers naturally fled. Between seven

and eight weeks after the murder of the old king, a battle was fought

near Malatiyeh, in Kappadokia, between the veterans of Esar-haddon and

the forces under his brothers and Erimenas, which ended in the complete

defeat of the latter. Esar-haddon was proclaimed king, and the event

proved that a wiser choice could not have been made.

His military genius was of the first order, but it was equalled by his

political tact. He was the only king of Assyria who endeavoured to

conciliate the nations he had conquered. Under him the fabric of the

Second Empire was completed by the conquest of Egypt. In the first year

of his reign he rebuilt Babylon, giving it back its captured deities,

its plunder, and its people. Henceforth Babylon became the second

capital of the empire, the court residing alternately there and at

Nineveh. It was while Esar-haddon was holding his winter court at

Babylon that Manasseh, of Judah, was brought to him as prisoner.[1]

[1] 2 Chr. xxxiii. 11.

The trade of Phœnicia was diverted into Assyrian hands by the

destruction of Sidon. The caravan-road from east to west was at the same

time rendered secure by an expedition into the heart of Northern Arabia.

Here Esar-haddon penetrated as far as the lands of Huz and Buz, 280

miles of the march being through a waterless desert. The feat has never

been excelled, and the terror it inspired among the Bedouin tribes was

not forgotten for many years. The northern frontiers of the kingdom were

also made safe by the defeat of Teispes, the Kimmerian, who was driven

westward with his hordes into Asia Minor. In the east the Assyrian

monarch was bold enough to occupy and work the copper-mines on the

distant borders of Media, the very name of which had scarcely been

heard of before. Westward, the kings of Cyprus paid homage to the great

conqueror, and among the princes who sent materials for his palace at

Nineveh were Cyprian rulers with Greek names.

But the principal achievement of Esar-haddon's reign was his conquest of

the ancient monarchy of Egypt. In B.C. 675 the Assyrian army started for

the banks of the Nile. Four years later Memphis was taken on the 22nd of

Tammuz, or June, and Tirhakah, the Egyptian king, compelled to fly first

to Thebes, and then into Ethiopia. Egypt was divided into twenty

satrapies, governed partly by Assyrians, partly by native princes, whose

conduct was watched by Assyrian garrisons. On his return to Assyria

Esar-haddon associated Assur-bani-pal, the eldest of his four sons, in

the government on the 12th of Iyyar, or April, B.C. 669, and died two

years afterwards (on the 12th of Marchesvan, or October), when again on

his way to Egypt. Assur-bani-pal, the Sardanapalos of the Greeks,

succeeded to the empire, his brother, Samas-sum-yukin, being entrusted

with the government of Babylonia.

Assur-bani-pal is probably the 'great and noble' Asnapper of Ezra iv.

10. He was luxurious, ambitious, and cruel, but a munificent patron of

literature. The libraries of Babylonia were ransacked for ancient texts,

and scribes were kept busily employed at Nineveh in inscribing new

editions of older works. But unlike his fathers, Assur-bani-pal refused

to face the hardships of a campaign. His armies were led by generals,

who were required to send despatches from time to time to the king. It

was evident that a purely military empire, like that of Assyria, could

not last long, when its ruler had himself ceased to take an active part

in military affairs. At first the veterans of his father preserved and

even extended the empire of Assur-bani-pal; but before his death it was

shattered irretrievably. It is characteristic of Assur-bani-pal that his

lion-hunts were mere _battues_, in which tame animals were released from

cages and lashed to make them run; in curious contrast to the lion-hunts

in the open field in which his warlike predecessors had delighted.

[Illustration: ASSUR-BANI-PAL AND HIS QUEEN.

(_From the original in the British Museum._)]

His first occupation was to crush a revolt in Egypt. Tirhakah was once

more driven out of the country, and Thebes, called Ni in the Assyrian

texts, and No-Amon, or 'No of the god Amun' in Scripture, was plundered

and destroyed. Its temples were hewed in pieces, and two of its

obelisks, weighing 70 tons in all, were carried as trophies to Nineveh.

It is to this destruction of the old capital of the Pharaohs that Nahum

refers in his prophecy (iii. 8).

Meanwhile Tyre had been besieged and forced to surrender, and Cilicia

had paid homage to the Assyrian king. Gog, or Gyges, of Lydia, too,

voluntarily sent him tribute, including two Kimmerian chieftains whom

the Lydian sovereign had captured in battle. When the Lydian ambassadors

arrived in Nineveh they found no one who could understand their

language; in fact, the very name of Lydia had been unknown to the

Assyrians before.

The Assyrian Empire had now reached its widest limits. Elam had fallen

after a long and arduous struggle. Shushan, its capital, was razed to

the ground, and the three last Elamite kings were bound to the yoke of

Assur-bani-pal's chariot, and made to drag their conqueror through the

streets of Nineveh. The Kedarites and other nomad tribes of Northern

Arabia were also chastised, the land of the Minni was overrun, and the

Armenians of Van begged for an alliance with the Assyrian king.

But while at the very height of his prosperity, the empire was fast

slipping away from under Assur-bani-pal's feet. In B.C. 652 a rebellion

broke out headed by his brother, the Babylonian viceroy, which shook it

to the foundations. Babylonia, Egypt, Palestine, and Arabia made common

cause against the oppressor. Lydia sent Karian and Ionic mercenaries to

Psammetikhos of Sais, with whose help he succeeded in overthrowing his

brother satraps, and in delivering Egypt from the Assyrian yoke. The

revolt in Babylonia took long to quell, and for a time the safety of

Assur-bani-pal himself was imperilled. At last in 647 Babylon and Cuthah

were reduced by famine, and Samas-sum-yukin burnt himself to death in

his palace. Fire and sword were carried through Elam, and the last of

its monarchs became an outlawed fugitive.

When Assyria finally emerged from the deadly struggle, Egypt was lost to

it for ever, and Babylonia was but half subdued. The latter province was

placed under the government of Kandalanu, who ruled over it for

twenty-two years, more like an independent sovereign than a viceroy. His

successor, Nabopolassar, the father of Nebuchadnezzar, threw off all

semblance of submission to Nineveh, and prepared the way for the empire

of his son. But meanwhile the once proud kingdom of Assyria had been

contending for bare existence. Assur-bani-pal's son, Assur-etil-ilani,

rebuilt with diminished splendour the palace of Calah, which seems to

have been burnt by some victorious enemy; and when the last Assyrian

king, Esar-haddon II, called Sarakos by the Greeks, mounted the throne,

he found himself surrounded on all sides by threatening foes. Kaztarit

or Kyaxares, Mamitarsu the Median, the Kimmerians, the Minni, and the

people of Sepharad leagued themselves together against the devoted city

of Nineveh. The frontier towns fell first, and though Esar-haddon in his

despair proclaimed public fasts and prayers to the gods, nothing could

ward off the doom pronounced by God's prophets against Nineveh so long

before. Nineveh was besieged, captured, and utterly destroyed; and the

second Assyrian Empire perished more hopelessly and completely than the

first. All that survived was the old capital of the country, Assur,

whose former inhabitants were allowed to return to it by Cyrus at the

time when the Jewish exiles also were released from their captivity in

Babylon.[2]

[2] The following are the significations of the different Assyrian

royal names mentioned in this chapter:—

Rimmon-nirari, 'Rimmon (the Air-god) is my help.'

Shalmaneser (Sallimanu-esir), 'Sallimanu (Solomon, the god of

peace) directs.' The Babylonians changed the name to

Sulman-asarid, 'Solomon is supreme.'

Tiglath-Pileser (Tukulti-pal-E-Sára), 'The servant of (the god

Adar) the son of E-'Sara (the temple of legions).'

Assur-dân, 'Assur is strong.'

Assur-natsir-pal, 'Assur is protector of the son.'

Samas-Rimmon, 'The Sun-god is also Rimmon (the Air-god).'

Sargon (Sarru-kunu), 'the constituted king.'

Sennacherib (Sinu-akhi-erba), 'The Moon-god increased the

brethren.'

Esar-haddon (Assur-akh-iddina), 'Assur gave a brother.'

Assur-bani-pal, 'Assur is creator of the son.'

Assur-etil-ilani, 'Assur is prince of the gods.'

[Illustration]

* * * * *

Assyria · 第 2 / 5 章