After a few seconds the latter went on,--

"Ah! I fear you still bear me some malice. If so, I regret it very

much. As I said before, you have no truer friend in Rome than the Order

and its unworthy General. I am convinced, both by my own experience and

by the reports of others, that you are an invaluable friend and agent of

the Society in countries where men like you, gentlemen of honour, bold,

unflinching, and of spotless name, are wanted at every turn,--men who

have the confidence of both parties, of enemies as well as friends. But

long ere this you will have seen that here in Rome we do things

differently; here we strike openly and at once, and we require agents of

a far lower type, not so much agents, indeed, as hammers ready to our

hand. Your refined nature is altogether out of place. As a friend I

recommend your return to England. Father St. Clare is there, and no

doubt requires you, and I am very certain that the climate of Rome will

not suit your health. You have passed some years very pleasantly in

Italy, as I believe, in spite of your share in those great sorrows to

which we all are heir; and though I am grieved to separate you from your

friends, the noblest in Rome, yet it is better that you should be parted

in this manner than by sharper and more sudden means. Every facility

shall be given you for transferring your property to England, and I hope

you will take with you no unpleasant recollections of this city, and of

the poor Fathers of Jesus, who wish you well."

He pronounced these last words with so much feeling that Inglesant could

only reply,--

"I have nothing to say of the Society but what is good. It has ever been

most tender and parental to me. I shall go away with nothing but

sadness and affection in my heart; with nothing but gratitude towards

you, Father, with nothing but reverence towards this city--the Mother of

the World."

*CHAPTER XIX.*

For a long time nothing was found among the papers from which these

memoirs have been compiled relative to Mr. Inglesant's life subsequent

to his return to England; but at last the following imperfect letter was

found, which is here given as containing all the information on the

subject which at present is known to exist.

The date, with the first part of the letter, is torn off. The first

perfect line is given. The spelling has been modernized throughout.

The superscription is as follows:--

Mr. Anthony Paschall,

Physician,

London,

from his friend,

Mr. Valentine Lee,

Chirurgeon,

Of Reading.

From a certain tone in parts of the letter it would seem that the writer

was one of those who gave cause for the accusation of scepticism brought

in those days against the medical profession generally.

* * * * * that vine, laden with grapes worked in gold and precious

stones, after the manner of Phrygian work, which, according to Josephus,

Tacitus, and other writers, adorned the Temple at Jerusalem, and was

seen of many when that Temple was destroyed; a manifest continuance of

the old Eastern worship of Bacchus, so dear to the human fraility. As

says the poet Anacreon, "Make me, good Vulcan, a deep bowl and carve on

it neither Charles's wain, nor the sad Orion, but carve me out a vine

with its swelling grapes, and Cupid, Bacchus, and Bathillus pressing

them together." For it is a gallant philosophy, and the deepest wisdom,

which, under the shadow of talismans and austere emblems, wears the

colours of enjoyment and of life.

Methinks if the Puritans of the last age had known that the same word in

Latin means both worship and the culture of polite life, they would not

have condemned both themselves and us to so many years of shadowy gloom

and of a morose antipathy to all delight. And though they will

perchance retort upon me that the same word in the Greek meaneth both

worship and bondage, yet I shall reply that it was a service of love and

pleasure--a service in which all the beauties of earth were called upon

to aid, and in which the Deity was best pleased by the happiness of His

creatures, whose every faculty of delight had been fully husbanded and

trained. In these last happy days, since his gracious Majesty's return,

we have seen a restoration of a cheerful gaiety, and adorning of men's

lives, when painting and poetry, and, beyond all, music, have smoothed

the rough ways and softened the hard manners of men.

I came to Oxford, travelling in the Flying Coach with a Quaker who

inveighed greatly against the iniquity of the age. At Oxford I saw more

than I have space to tell you of; amongst others, Francis Tatton, who,

you will recollect, left his religion since the King's return, and

sheltered himself amongst the Jesuits. He was but lately come to

Oxford, and lodged at Francis Alder's against the Fleur-de-lis. I dined

with him there along with some others, and it being a Friday, they had a

good fish dinner with white wine. Among the guests was one Father

Lovel, a Jesuit. He has lived in Oxford many years to supply service

for the Catholics, so bold and free are the Papists now.

I conversed with another of the guests, a physician, who after dinner

took me to his house in Bear Lane, and showed me his study, in a

pleasant room to the south, overlooking some of Christ Church gardens.

Here he began to complain of the Royal Society, and the Virtuosi, and I

soon saw that he was a follower of Dr. Gideon Harvey and Mr. Stubbes.

"The country owes much," he said, "to such men as Burleigh, Walsingham,

Jewel, Abbot, Usher, Casaubon; but if this new-fangled philosophy and

mechanical education is to bear the bell, I foresee that we shall look

in vain in England for such men again. In these deep and subtle

inquiries into natural philosophy and the intricate mechanisms by which

this world is said to be governed, neither physic will be unconcerned

nor will religion remain unshaken amidst the writings of these Virtuosi.

That art of reasoning by which the prudent are discriminated from fools,

which methodizes and facilitates our discourse, which informs us of the

validity of consequences and the probability of arguments--that art

which gives life to solid eloquence, and which renders statesmen,

divines, physicians, and lawyers accomplished--how is this cried down

and vilified by the ignoramuses of these days!"

I pleased myself with inspecting this man's books, with which his study

was well stored, and with the view from his window; but I let his tongue

run on uncontradicted, seeing that he was of the old Protestant and

scholastic learning, which is never open to let in new light. He

entertained me, besides, with a long discourse to prove that Geber the

chemist was not an Indian King, and informed me with great glee that the

Royal Society, among other new-fangled propositions, had conceived the

idea of working silk into hats, which project, though the hatters

laughed at it, yet to satisfy them trial was made, and for twenty

shillings they had a hat made, but it proved so bad that any one might

have bought a better one for eighteenpence.

He was entering upon a long argument against Descartes, to refute whom

he was obliged to contradict much that he had said before, but at this

time I excused myself and left him.

When I came out from this man's house the college bells were going for

Chapel, as they used to do in the old time; methought it was the

prettiest music I had heard for many a day. I went to see an old man I

remembered in Jesus Lane. I found him in the same little house, dressed

in his gown tied round the middle, the sleeves pinned behind, and his

dudgeon with a knife and bodkin; it was the fashion for grave people to

wear such gowns in the latter end of Queen Elizabeth's days. He says he

is 104. When I was a boy at Oxon I used to be always inquiring of him

of the old time, the rood lofts, the ceremonies in the College Chapels;

and his talk is still of Queen Bess her days, and of the old people who

remembered the host and the wafer bread and the roods in the Churches.

In my time, at Oxford, crucifixes were common in the glass in the study

windows, and in the chamber windows pictures of saints. This was

"before the wars." What a different world it was before the wars! What

strange old-world customs and thoughts and stories vanished like

phantoms when the war trumpets sounded, and great houses and proud

names, and dominions and manors, and stately woods, crumbled into dust,

and every man did as seemed good to himself, and thought as he liked.

On the Sunday I went to St. Mary's, and heard a preacher and herbalist,

who spoke of the virtues of plants and of the Christian life in one

breath. He told us that Homer writ sublimely and called them [Greek:

cheires theon], the hands of the Gods, and that we ought to reach to

them religiously with praise and thanksgiving. "God Almighty," he said,

"hath furnished us with plants to cure us within a few miles of our own

abodes, and we know it not."

The next day I came to Worcester by the post, to the house of my old

friend Nathaniel Tomkins, who is now one of the Prebends and Receptor.

He lives in the close, or college green, as they call it here. He comes

of a family of musicians. His grandfather was chanter of the choir of

Gloucester; his father organist to this same Cathedral of Worcester, and

one of his uncles organist of St. Paul's and gentleman of the Chapel

Royal, and another, of whom more anon, gentleman of the Privy Chamber to

His Majesty Charles the First, and well skilled in the practical part of

music, and was happily translated to the celestial choir of angels

before the troubles.

I was pleased to see the faithful city recovered from the ashes in which

she sat when I was here last, and the daily service of song again

restored to the Cathedral Church, though the latter is much out of

repair and dimmed as to its splendour. I like that religion the best

which gives us sweet anthems and solemn organ music and lively parts of

melody.

I had not been here long when my friend the Receptor told me that if I

should stay two or three days longer, I should hear as good a concert of

violins as any in England, and also hear a gentleman lately come from

Italy, whose skill as a lutinist and player on the violin had preceded

him. When I asked for the name of this gentleman, he told me it was

that Mr. John Inglesant who was servant to the late King, and of whom so

much was spoken in the time of the Irish Rebellion. When I heard this I

resolved to stay, as you may suppose, considering that we have more than

once spoken together of this person and desired to see him, especially

since it had been reported that he was returned to England.

I therefore willingly promised to remain, and spent my time in

practising on the violin, and in the city and cathedral. I walked upon

the river bank, and up and down the fine broad streets leading from the

bridge to the cathedral. From the gates of the chancel down the stone

steps the strange light streamed on to the paved floor of the nave,

chill and silent as the grave until the strains of the organs awoke.

Mr. Tomkins told me that the loyal gentry of the surrounding counties

had, during the usurpation, made it a point of honour to purchase and

trade in Worcester, for the relief and encouragement of the citizens,

who were reduced to so low an ebb by the battle and taking of the city.

Thursday was the day appointed for the music meeting, and on that day I

accompanied Mr. Tomkins to the house of Mr. Barnabas Oley, another of

the Prebends, who, you may remember, wrote a preface, a year or two ago,

to Mr. Herbert's "Country Parson." He also lives in the College Green,

and we found the company assembling in an oak parlour, which looked upon

an orchard where the trees were in full blossom. There were present

several of the clergy, and two or three physicians and other gentlemen,

who practised upon the violin.

As we entered the room, Mr. Oley was speaking of Mr. Inglesant, who was

expected to come presently with the Dean. "I remember him well," he was

saying, "when I was in poverty and sequestration in the late troubles.

He was supposed to be in all the King's secrets, and was constantly

employed in private messages and errands. Some said that he was a

concealed Papist, but I have known him to attend the Church service very

devoutly. I recollect when I was in the garrison at Pontefract Castle,

and used to preach there as long as it held out for His Majesty, that

this Mr. Inglesant suddenly appeared amongst us, though the leaguer was

very close, and I know he attended service there once or twice. I was

often at that time in want of bread, during my hidings and wanderings,

and obliged to change my habit, and did constantly appear in a cloak and

grey clothes. On one of these occasions, when I was in great distress

and was diligently and particularly sought for by the rebels, who would

willingly have gratified those that would have discovered me, I fell in

with this Mr. Inglesant at an inn in Buckinghamshire. He was then in

company with one whom I knew to be a Popish priest, but they both

exerted themselves very kindly in my behalf, and conducted me to the

house of a Catholic gentleman in those parts by whom I was entertained

several days. Before this, I now recollect, at the beginning of the

wars, I met Mr. Inglesant at Oxford. I was in the shop of a bookseller

named Forrest, against All Soul's College. I remember that I took up

Plato's select dialogues 'De rebus divinis,' in Greek and Latin, and

excepted against some things as superfluous and cabalistical, and that

Mr. Inglesant, who was then a very young man, defended the author in a

way that showed his scholarship. It was summer weather and very warm,

and the enemy's cannon were playing upon the city as we could hear as we

talked in the shop."

While Mr. Oley was thus recollecting his past troubles, Mr. Dean was

announced, and entered the room accompanied by Mr. Inglesant and by a

servant who carried their violins. You are, I know, acquainted with the

Dean, who is also Bishop of St. David's, and who, they say, will be

Bishop of Worcester also before long, so I need not describe him. The

first sight of Mr. Inglesant pleased me very much. He wore his own hair

long, after the fashion of the last age, but in other respects he was

dressed in the mode, in a French suit of black satin, with cravat and

ruffles of Mechlin lace. His expression was lofty and abstracted, his

features pale and somewhat thin, and his carriage gave me the idea of a

man who had seen the world, and in whom few things were capable of

exciting any extreme interest or attention. His eyes were light blue,

of that peculiar shade which gives a dreamy and indifferent expression

to the face. His manner was courteous and polite, almost to excess, yet

he seemed to me to be a man who was habitually superior to his company,

and I felt in his presence almost as I should do in that of a prince.

Something of this doubtless was due to the sense I had of the part he

had played in the great events of the late troubles, and of the nearness

of intercourse and of the confidence he had enjoyed with his late

Majesty of blessed memory. It was impossible not to look with interest

upon a man who had been so familiar with the secret history of those

times, and who had been taken into the confidence both of Papists and

Churchmen.

When he had been introduced to the company, Mr. Oley reminded him of the

incidents he had been relating before his arrival. When he mentioned

the meeting in the inn in Buckinghamshire, Mr. Inglesant seemed

affected.

"I remember it well," he said. "I was with Father St. Clare, whose

deathbed I attended not two months after my return to England. Do you

remember, Mr. Oley," he went on to say, "the sermons at St. Martin's in

Oxford, where Mr. Giles Widdowes preached? I remember seeing you there,

sir, and indeed his high and loyal sermons were much frequented by the

royal party and soldiers of the garrison; and I have heard that he was

most benevolent to many of the most needy in their distress. I remember

that poor Whitford played the organs there often, before he was killed

in the trenches."

"Ah," said Mr. Oley, "we have heard strange music in our day. I was in

York when it was besieged by three very notable and great armies--the

Scotch, the Northern under Lord Fairfax, and the Southern under the Earl

of Manchester and Oliver. At that time the service at the Cathedral

every Sunday morning was attended by more than a thousand ladies,

knights, and gentlemen, besides soldiers and citizens; when the booming

of cannon broke in upon the singing of the psalms, and more than once a

cannon bullet burst into the Minster amongst the people, like a furious

fiend or evil spirit, yet no one hurt."

After some talk of this nature we settled ourselves to our music and to

tune our instruments. Mr. Inglesant's violin was inscribed "Jacobus

Stainer in Absam prope OEnipontem 1647;" OEnipons is the Latin name of

Inspruck in Germany, the chief city of the Tyrol, where this maker

lived. As soon as Mr. Inglesant drew his bow across the strings I was

astonished at the full and piercing tone, which seemed to me to exceed

even that of the Cremonas.

We played a concert or two, with a double bass part for the violone,

which had a noble effect; and Mr. Inglesant being pressed to oblige the

company, played a descant upon a ground bass in the Italian manner. I

should fail were I to attempt to describe to you what I felt during the

performance of this piece. It seemed to me as though thoughts, which I

had long sought and seemed ever and anon on the point of realizing, were

at last given me, as I listened to chords of plaintive sweetness broken

now and again by cruel and bitter discords--a theme into which were

wrought street and tavern music and people's songs, which lively airs

and catches, upon the mere pressure of the string, trembled into

pathetic and melancholy cadences. In these dying falls and closes all

the several parts were gathered up and brought together, yet so that

what before was joy was now translated into sorrow, and the sorrowful

transfigured to peace, as indeed the many shifting scenes of life vary

upon the stage of men's affairs.

The concert being over, Mr. Dean informed us that it was his intention

to attend the afternoon service in the Cathedral, and Mr. Inglesant

accompanying him, the physicians departed to visit their patients, and

my host and some of the clergy and myself went to the Cathedral also,

entering rather late.

After the service, in which was sung an anthem by Dr. Nathaniel Giles,

Mr. Dean retired to the vestry, and Mr. Inglesant coming down the

Church, I found myself close to him at the west door. We stopped

opposite to the monument of Bishop Gauden, who is depicted in his effigy

holding a book, presumably the "_Icon Basilike_" in his hand. I

inquired of Mr. Inglesant what his opinions were concerning the

authorship of that work, and finding that he was disposed to converse,

we went down to the river side, the evening being remarkably fine, and,

crossing by the ferry, walked for some time in the chapter meadows upon

the farther bank. The evening sun was setting towards the range of the

Malvern Hills, and the towers and spires of the city were shining in its

glow, and were reflected in the water at our feet.

I said to Mr. Inglesant that I was greatly interested in the events of

the last age, in which he had been so trusted and prominent an actor,

and that I hoped to learn from him many interesting particulars, but he

informed me that he knew but little except what the world was already

possessed of. He said that he very deeply regretted that, during the

last two years of the life of the late King, he himself was a close

prisoner in the Tower; and was therefore prevented from assisting in any

way, or being useful to His Majesty. He said that there was something

peculiarly affecting in the position of the King in those days, as he

was isolated from his friends, and entirely dependant upon three or four

faithful and subordinate servants. He said that, since his return to

England, he had made it his business to seek out several of these, and

had received much interesting information from them, which, as he hoped

it would soon be made public, he was not at present at liberty to

communicate. Mr. Inglesant, however, told me one incident relating to

the last days of the King of so affecting a character that, as it is too

long to be repeated here, I shall hope to inform you of when we meet

together. He said, moreover, that the fatal mistake the King made was

consenting to the death of Lord Strafford; that on many occasions he had

yielded when he should have been firm; but that most of his misfortunes,

such as reverses and indecisions in the field, were caused by

circumstances entirely beyond his control. There is nothing new in

these opinions, but I give them just as Mr. Inglesant stated them, lest

you should think I had not taken advantage of the opportunity presented

to me. It appeared to me that he was not very willing to discourse upon

these bygone matters of State intrigue.

Seeing this I changed the topic, and said that as Mr. Inglesant had had

much experience in the working of the Romish system, I should be glad to

know his opinion of it, and whether he preferred it to that of the

English Church. Here I found I was on different ground. I saw at once

beneath the veil of polite manner, which was this man's second nature,

that his whole life and being was in this question.

"This is the supreme quarrel of all," he said. "This is not a dispute

between sects and kingdoms; it is a conflict within a man's own

nature--nay, between the noblest parts of man's nature arrayed against

each other. On the one side obedience and faith, on the other, freedom

and the reason. What can come of such a conflict as this but throes and

agony? I was not brought up by the Papists in England, nor, indeed, did

I receive my book learning from them. I was trained for a special

purpose by one of the Jesuits, but the course he took with me was

different from that which he would have taken with other pupils whom he

did not design for such work. I derived my training from various

sources, and especially, instead of Aristotle, and the school-men, I was

fed upon Plato. The difference is immense. I was trained to obedience

and devotion; but the reason in my mind for this conduct was that

obedience and devotion and gratitude were ideal virtues, not that they

benefited the order to which I belonged, nor the world in which I lived.

This I take to be the difference between the Papists and myself. The

Jesuits do not like Plato, as lately they do not like Lord Bacon.

Aristotle, as interpreted by the school-men, is more to their mind.

According to their reading of Aristotle, all his Ethics are subordinated

to an end, and in such a system they see a weapon which they can turn to

their own purpose of maintaining dogma, no matter at what sacrifice of

the individual conscience or reason. This is what the Church of Rome

has ever done. She has traded upon the highest instincts of humanity,

upon its faith and love, its passionate remorse, its self-abnegation and

denial, its imagination and yearning after the unseen. It has based its

system upon the profoundest truths, and upon this platform it has raised

a power which has, whether foreseen by its authors or not, played the

part of human tyranny, greed, and cruelty. To support this system it

has habitually set itself to suppress knowledge and freedom of thought,

before thought had taught itself to grapple with religious subjects,

because it foresaw that this would follow. It has, therefore, for the

sake of preserving intact its dogma, risked the growth and welfare of

humanity, and has, in the eyes of all except those who value this dogma

above all other things, constituted itself the enemy of the human race.

I have perhaps occupied a position which enables me to judge somewhat

advantageously between the Churches, and my earnest advice is this. You

will do wrong--mankind will do wrong--if it allows to drop out of

existence, merely because the position on which it stands seems to be

illogical, an agency by which the devotional instincts of human nature

are enabled to exist side by side with the rational. The English

Church, as established by the law of England, offers the supernatural to

all who choose to come. It is like the Divine Being Himself, whose sun

shines alike on the evil and on the good. Upon the altars of the Church

the divine presence hovers as surely, to those who believe it, as it

does upon the splendid altars of Rome. Thanks to circumstances which the

founders of our Church did not contemplate, the way is open; it is

barred by no confession, no human priest. Shall we throw this aside?

It has been won for us by the death and torture of men like ourselves in

bodily frame, infinitely superior to some of us in self-denial and

endurance. God knows--those who know my life know too well--that I am

not worthy to be named with such men; nevertheless, though we cannot

endure as they did, at least do not let us needlessly throw away what

they have won. It is not even a question of religious freedom only; it

is a question of learning and culture in every form. I am not blind to

the peculiar dangers that beset the English Church. I fear that its

position, standing, as it does, a mean between two extremes, will

engender indifference and sloth; and that its freedom will prevent its

preserving a discipline and organizing power, without which any

community will suffer grievous damage; nevertheless, as a Church it is

unique: if suffered to drop out of existence, nothing like it can ever

take its place."

"The Church of England," I said, seeing that Mr. Inglesant paused, "is

no doubt a compromise, and is powerless to exert its discipline, as the

events of the late troubles have shown. It speaks with bated assurance,

while the Church of Rome never falters in its utterance, and I confess

seems to me to have a logical position. If there be absolute truth

revealed, there must be an inspired exponent of it, else from age to age

it could not get itself revealed to mankind."

"This is the Papist argument," said Mr. Inglesant; "there is only one

answer to it--Absolute truth is not revealed. There were certain

dangers which Christianity could not, as it would seem, escape. As it

brought down the sublimest teaching of Platonism to the humblest

understanding, so it was compelled, by this very action, to reduce

spiritual and abstract truth to hard and inadequate dogma. As it

inculcated a sublime indifference to the things of this life, and a

steadfast gaze upon the future; so, by this very means, it encouraged

the growth of a wild unreasoning superstition. It is easy to draw

pictures of martyrs suffering the torture unmoved in the face of a

glorious hereafter; but we must acknowledge, unless we choose to call

these men absolute fiends, that it was these selfsame ideas of the

future, and its relation to this life, that actuated their tormentors.

If these things are true,--if the future of mankind is parcelled out

between happiness and eternal torture,--then, to ensure the safety of

mankind at large, the death and torment for a few moments of

comparatively few need excite but little regret. From the instant that

the founder of Christianity left the earth, perhaps even before, this

ghastly spectre of superstition ranged itself side by side with the

advancing faith. It is confined to no Church or sect; it exists in all.

Faith in the noble, the unseen, the unselfish, by its very nature

encourages this fatal growth; and it is nourished even by those who have

sufficient strength to live above it; because, forsooth, its removal may

be dangerous to the well-being of society at large, as though anything

could be more fatal than falsehood against the Divine Truth."

"But if absolute truth is not revealed," I said, "how can we know the

truth at all?"

"We cannot say how we know it," replied Mr. Inglesant, "but this very

ignorance proves that we can know. We are the creatures of this

ignorance against which we rebel. From the earliest dawn of existence

we have known nothing. How then could we question for a moment? What

thought should we have other than this ignorance which we had imbibed

from our growth, but for the existence of some divine principle, 'Fons

veri lucidus' within us? The Founder of Christianity said, 'The kingdom

of God is within you.' We may not only know the truth, but we may live

even in this life in the very household and court of God. We are the

creatures of birth, of ancestry, of circumstance; we are surrounded by

law, physical and psychical, and the physical very often dominates and

rules the soul. As the chemist, the navigator, the naturalist, attain

their ends by means of law, which is beyond their power to alter, which

they cannot change, but with which they can work in harmony, and by so

doing produce definite results, so may we. We find ourselves immersed in

physical and psychical laws, in accordance with which we act, or from

which we diverge. Whether we are free to act or not we can at least

fancy that we resolve. Let us cheat ourselves, if it be a cheat, with

this fancy, for we shall find that by so doing we actually attain the

end we seek. Virtue, truth, love, are not mere names; they stand for

actual qualities which are well known and recognized among men. These

qualities are the elements of an ideal life, of that absolute and

perfect life of which our highest culture can catch but a glimpse. As

Mr. Hobbes has traced the individual man up to the perfect state, or

Civitas, let us work still lower, and trace the individual man from

small origins to the position he at present fills. We shall find that

he has attained any position of vantage he may occupy by following the

laws which our instinct and conscience tell us are Divine. Terror and

superstition are the invariable enemies of culture and progress. They

are used as rods and bogies to frighten the ignorant and the base, but

they depress all mankind to the same level of abject slavery. The ways

are dark and foul, and the grey years bring a mysterious future which we

cannot see. We are like children, or men in a tennis court, and before

our conquest is half won the dim twilight comes and stops the game;

nevertheless, let us keep our places, and above all things hold fast by

the law of life we feel within. This was the method which Christ

followed, and He won the world by placing Himself in harmony with that

law of gradual development which the Divine Wisdom has planned. Let us

follow in His steps and we shall attain to the ideal life; and, without

waiting for our 'mortal passage,' tread the free and spacious streets of

that Jerusalem which is above."

He spoke more to himself than to me. The sun, which was just setting

behind the distant hills, shone with dazzling splendour for a moment

upon the towers and spires of the city across the placid water. Behind

this fair vision were dark rain clouds, before which gloomy background

it stood in fairy radiance and light. For a moment it seemed a glorious

city, bathed in life and hope, full of happy people who thronged its

streets and bridge, and the margin of its gentle stream. But it was

"breve gaudium." Then the sunset faded, and the ethereal vision

vanished, and the landscape lay dark and chill.

"The sun is set," Mr. Inglesant said cheerfully, "but it will rise

again. Let us go home."

I have writ much more largely in this letter than I intended, but I have

been led onward by the interest which I deny not I feel in this man.

When we meet I will tell you more.

Your ever true friend,

VALENTINE LEE.

John Inglesant: A Romance (Volume 2 of 2) · 第 15 / 16 题