FIFTH SIEGE, A.D. 1667.

No monarch ever went to war more wantonly and unnecessarily than Louis

XIV. Inflated with vanity and self-love, intoxicated with flattery, he

seemed to look upon military glory as the only thing wanting to his

fame and his happiness. But never did monarch receive a much stronger

rebuke from an overruling Providence! He was taught that the prosperity

of nations is not to be trifled with for the gratification of one man’s

pride; and the wars he undertook so rashly and wickedly proved to be

the sources of misery to which his arrogant self-sufficiency would have

led him to believe he could not be subjected.

In 1666, Louis XIV. lost his mother, Anne of Austria; Philip IV.,

her father, had died the preceding year. When Louis married Maria

Theresa, that princess had formally renounced all right of succession

to Spain or the Austrian dominions; but Louis, now heedless of this

renunciation, immediately laid claim to Flanders, to the exclusion of

Charles II., the minor son of Philip IV. The pretence he assigned was,

that the queen’s dowry not having been paid, her renunciation was null

and void, and he invoked a custom of Brabant, by which eldest daughters

inherited in preference to younger sons. He supported these claims by

a numerous army; won over the emperor Leopold, by giving him hopes he

might share the spoils of Charles II., and took the field at the head

of his household. Turenne commanded under him; Vauban, and his minister

Louvois, accompanied him. We have often, when contemplating this siege

of Tournai, wondered what Louis could really think of himself--what

he imagined his position actually was in the scale of humanity. He

proceeded to the infliction of war upon an unoffending people--of war,

the direst evil we know or can fancy,--with all the “pride, pomp,

and circumstance” of a barbarous Eastern despot. Darius, when he met

Alexander, was scarcely surrounded with so much splendour, and perhaps

not so many indulgent comforts, and, what is still more striking,

did not in the eyes of his people so completely violate all that the

civilized world deems moral or worthy of being an example. He was

accompanied by his queen and his then adored mistress, the fascinating

Montespan, with whom he lived in a state of double adultery. His court

was with him in all its splendour; he had his historian to record the

exploits of his generals and his armies, and his poets to sing his

praises and attribute every success to his divine presence. Here was

a beleaguered town, suffering all the horrors of a siege, with almost

the certainty of being taken; there was an army appearing to invade the

rights of another nation in mere wantonness, indulging in voluptuous

vice, and, in contrast with the town, passing its nights in festivity,

song, music, and dancing; vice and cruelty, pleasure and suffering,

throwing each other into the strongest relief.

Louis’ army consisted of thirty-five thousand men. It was on this

occasion that the minister Louvois introduced the improvement of

supporting armies by magazines. Whatever siege the king undertook, to

whichever side he directed his arms, supplies of all kinds were ready,

the lodgings of the troops were provided, and the marches regulated.

The king had only to present himself before the cities of Flanders

to subdue them: he entered Charleroi as he would have entered Paris;

Bergues-Saint-Veux, Ath, Furnes, Armentière, and Coutrai, opened their

gates at the approach of the French battalions. Tournai showed signs of

resistance. It was besieged in form, the artillery brought to bear upon

it, and two days after the trenches had been opened it capitulated. The

citadel was then closely pressed, and that likewise surrendered on the

morrow. The conqueror had both city and citadel fortified; and Mégrigni

made the latter, of which he was governor, one of the best places in

Europe.

The Great Sieges of History · 第 180 / 353 题