THIRD SIEGE, A.C. 87.

Archelaus, a general of Mithridates, king of Pontus, entered Athens

by means of a sophist named Aristion, to whom he gave the principal

authority of the place. The Athenians claimed the assistance of the

Romans, and Sylla took the matter upon his own hands.

Upon Sylla’s arrival in Greece, all the cities opened their gates to

him, with the exception of Athens, which, subject to Aristion, was

obliged unwillingly to oppose him. When the Roman general entered

Attica, he divided his forces into two bodies, the one of which he

sent to besiege Aristion, in the city of Athens, and with the other he

marched in person to the port Piræus, which was a kind of second city,

where Archelaus had shut himself up, relying upon the strength of the

place, the walls being sixty feet high, and all of hewn stone. This

had been the work of Pericles, during the Peloponnesian war.

The height of the walls did not amaze Sylla. He employed all kinds of

engines in battering them, and made continual assaults. If he would

have waited a little, he might have taken the higher city without

striking a blow, for it was reduced to the last extremity by famine;

but being in haste to return to Rome, where he apprehended changes

might happen in his absence, he spared neither danger, attacks, nor

expense, to hasten the conclusion of this war. Without enumerating the

rest of the warlike stores and equipage, twenty thousand mules were

perpetually employed in working the machines alone. Wood falling short,

from the great consumption of it in the machines, which were constantly

being broken, in consequence of the vast weight they carried, or burnt

by the enemy, he did not spare the sacred groves. He cut down the

beautiful avenues of the Academy and the Lycæum, and caused the high

walls which joined the port to the city to be demolished, for the sake

of the ruins, which were useful to him in the works he was carrying

on. Having occasion for a great deal of money, both for the expenses

of the war, and as a stimulus to the soldiers, he had recourse to the

hitherto inviolable treasures of the temples, and caused the finest and

most precious gifts, consecrated at Epidamus and Olympia, to be brought

thence. He wrote to the Amphyctions, assembled at Delphi, “That they

would act wisely in sending him the treasures of the god, because they

would be more secure in his hands; and that if he should be obliged to

make use of them, he would return the value after the war.” At the same

time he sent one of his friends, named Caphis, a native of Phocis, to

Delphi, to receive all those treasures by weight. When Caphis arrived

at Delphi, he was afraid, through reverence for the god, to meddle

with the consecrated gifts, and bewailed with tears, in the presence

of the Amphyctions, the necessity imposed upon him. Upon which some

person there having said that he heard the sound of Apollo’s lyre from

the interior of the sanctuary, Caphis, whether he really believed it

or not, was willing to take advantage of the circumstance to impress

Sylla with a religious awe, and wrote him an account of it. Sylla,

deriding his simplicity, replied, “That he was surprised he should

not comprehend that singing was a sign of joy, and by no means of

anger and resentment; and, therefore, he had nothing to do but to take

the treasures boldly, and be assured that the god saw him do so with

pleasure, and gave them to him himself.” Plutarch, on this occasion,

notices the difference between the ancient Roman generals and those

of the times we now speak of. The former, whom merit alone had raised

to office, and who had no other views from their employments but the

public good, knew how to make the soldiers respect and obey them,

without descending to use low and unworthy methods for that purpose.

They commanded troops that were steady, disciplined, and well enured

to execute the orders of their generals, without reply or delay. Truly

kings, says Plutarch, in the grandeur and nobility of their sentiments,

but simple and modest private persons in their train and equipage, they

put the state to no other expense, in the discharge of their offices,

than was reasonable and necessary, conceiving it more shameful in

a captain to flatter his soldiers than to fear his enemies. Things

were much changed in the time we now speak of. The Roman generals,

abandoned to insatiable ambition and luxury, were obliged to make

themselves slaves to their soldiers, and to buy their services by gifts

proportioned to their avidity, and often by the toleration and impunity

of the greatest crimes.

Sylla was exceedingly anxious about this siege, and was, as we have

said, in great want of money. He was desirous of depriving Mithridates

of the only city he held in Greece, which might almost be considered

as a key to Asia, whither the Romans were eager to follow the king of

Pontus. If he returned to Rome without achieving this conquest, he

would find Marius and his faction more formidable than ever. He was

besides sensibly galled by the keen raillery which Aristion vented

every day against him and his wife Metella.

It is difficult to say whether the attack or defence was conducted with

the most vigour; for both sides behaved with incredible courage and

firmness. The sallies were frequent, and were, in character, almost

battles, in which the slaughter was great, and the loss generally

not unequal. The besieged were supported by several seasonable

reinforcements by sea.

What did them most damage was the secret treachery of two Athenian

slaves, who were in the Piræus. These slaves, whether out of affection

for the Roman interest, or desirous of providing for their own safety

in case the place were taken, wrote upon leaden balls all that was

going forward within, and threw them from slings to the Romans; so

that, how prudent soever were the measures adopted by Archelaus, none

of them succeeded. He resolved to make a general sally; the traitor

slung a leaden ball, inscribed, “To-morrow, at such an hour, the fort

will attack your works, and the horse your camp.” Sylla laid ambushes,

and repulsed the besieged with loss. A convoy of provisions, sadly

wanted, was to be thrown into the city by night; upon advice, conveyed

in the same way, the provisions were intercepted.

Notwithstanding all these disappointments, the Athenians defended

themselves bravely. They found means either to burn most of the

machines erected against their walls, or, by undermining them, to throw

them down, and break them to pieces. The Romans, on their side, behaved

with no less vigour. By means of mines, they made a way to the bottom

of the walls, under which they hollowed the ground; and having propped

the foundation with beams of wood, they afterwards set fire to the

props, with a great quantity of pitch, sulphur, and tar. When these

beams were burnt, part of the wall fell down with a horrible noise, and

a large breach was opened, through which the Romans advanced to the

assault. This battle was contested with great obstinacy, but at length

the Romans were obliged to retire.

The next day they renewed the attack. The besieged had built a fresh

wall during the night, in the form of a crescent, in the place of that

which had been destroyed, and the Romans found it impossible to force

it.

Sylla, discouraged by so obstinate a defence, resolved to make no more

assaults, but to take the place by famine. The city, on the other

hand, was at the last extremity. A bushel of barley had been sold for

a thousand drachmas (about £25 sterling). The inhabitants did not only

eat the grass and roots which they found about the citadel, but the

flesh of horses, and the leather of their shoes, which they boiled

soft. In the midst of the public misery, the tyrant passed his days and

nights in revelling. The senators and priests went to throw themselves

at his feet, imploring him to have pity on the city, and to obtain a

capitulation from Sylla; he had them dispersed with a shower of arrows,

and in that brutal manner drove them from his presence.

He did not demand a cessation of arms, or send a deputation to

Sylla, till reduced to the last extremity. As those deputies made no

proposals, and asked nothing of him to the purpose, but ran on in

praise of Theseus, Eumelpus, and the exploits of the Athenians against

the Medes, Sylla was annoyed by their discourse, and interrupted

them by saying:--“Gentlemen orators, you may go back, and keep your

rhetorical flourishes for yourselves; for my part, I was not sent to

Athens to be made acquainted with your ancient prowess, but to chastise

your modern revolt.”

During this audience, some spies having entered the city by chance,

overheard some old men talking in the Ceramicus, and blaming the tyrant

exceedingly for not guarding a part of the wall, which was the only

place where the enemy might easily take the city by escalade. At their

return to the camp, they related what they had heard to Sylla. The

parley had been to no purpose. Sylla did not neglect the intelligence

given him. The next night he went in person to take a view of the

place, and finding the wall actually accessible, he ordered ladders to

be raised against it, began the attack there, and having made himself

master of the walls, after a weak resistance, he entered the city. He

would not suffer it to be set on fire, but abandoned it to be plundered

by the soldiers, who in several houses found human flesh, which had

been dressed to be eaten. A dreadful slaughter ensued. The following

day all the slaves were sold by auction, and liberty was granted to the

citizens who had escaped the swords of the soldiers, but their numbers

were but few. Sylla at once besieged the citadel, where Aristion, and

those who had taken refuge there, were soon so much reduced by famine

that they were forced to surrender. The tyrant, his guards, and all

who had been in any office under him, were put to death. Some few days

after, Sylla made himself master of the Piræus, and burnt all its

fortifications, especially the arsenal, which had been built by Philo,

the celebrated architect, and was a wonderful fabric. Archelaus, by

means of his fleet, had retired to Munichia, another port of Attica.

To do this commander justice, he deserved to have conquered, for he had

failed in neither courage nor skilful exertions during the siege. With

his own hand he set fire to one of the Roman galleries, and destroyed

all the machines upon it. On another occasion, his soldiers being

repulsed, took to flight, and he in vain endeavoured to rally them. He

was soon left so completely alone, that he had to be drawn up the wall

by ropes. His bravery formed a strong contrast with the cowardice and

infamous debaucheries of Aristion.

Sylla restored the Athenians their liberty, but not that consideration

generally the companion of power. During several ages Athens was

still considered the common country of tasteful knowledge; people

went thither for the purpose of instructing themselves in the arts

of thinking and speaking correctly. By degrees her talents were

extinguished, and her renown was eclipsed. Succumbing by turn to all

the barbarians who invaded the Roman empire, she changed masters as

often as she saw enemies at her gates. The Turks destroyed what were

left of her splendid edifices. Twice the Venetians paid the honours of

a siege to Setine, built upon its ruins. After so much destruction and

so many sieges, the traveller can scarcely discover the ruins of Athens

upon the soil where formerly stood that celebrated city.

The Great Sieges of History · 第 86 / 353 题