A.C. 1252.

The history of this famous siege has been rendered immortal by the

tragic muse; few of our readers can require to have its details

repeated to them. The unfortunate Œdipus, on quitting his kingdom,

left it to the government of his two sons, Eteocles and Polynices, who

agreed to mount the throne alternately. Eteocles, as the elder, reigned

first; but, at the termination of his year, he was so enamoured of

the power he had tasted, that he violated his oath, and endeavoured

to exclude his brother from the throne. Polynices took up arms, and

sought on all sides for partisans to assist him against the usurper;

Adrastus, king of the Argives, roused all Greece in his favour. The

contest was long and sanguinary, and the chief loss fell upon the

adherents of Polynices. After many fruitless battles beneath the walls

of Thebes, the brothers resolved to terminate their quarrel by a single

combat. The two armies were drawn up as witnesses of the fight, and

as securities for its fairness. The unnatural enemies entered the

prescribed lists, and attacked each other with such deadly animosity,

that both fell dead upon the spot. It is feigned that, when their

bodies were burnt, the spirit of hatred remained unextinct even in

their remains, and that the flames separated as they arose. Their

antipathy was preserved in their posterity, breaking out into needless

but bloody wars. In such a work as this, principally intended for the

young, it was impossible to pass by so memorable a siege; otherwise, we

conceive the whole history of Œdipus and his race to be one of the most

unpleasing handed down to us by the Greeks.

The Great Sieges of History · 第 23 / 353 题