LITERATURE AND POLITICS

[Speech of John Morley at the banquet of the Royal Academy, London, May

3, 1890. Sir Frederic Leighton, President of the Academy, said in

introducing Mr. Morley: "With Literature I associate, not for the

first time, the name of a master of strong and sober English, a man in

whose writings the clear vision of a seeker after truth controls the

generous fervor of an idealist, and of whom every appreciator of a

fine literary temper must earnestly hope that the paths upon which he

has so long trod with growing honor may never become wholly strangers

to his feet--I mean Mr. John Morley."]

MR. PRESIDENT, YOUR ROYAL HIGHNESS, MY LORDS, LADIES AND

GENTLEMEN:--I feel that I am more unworthy now than I was eight

years ago to figure as the representative of literature before this

brilliant gathering of all the most important intellectual and social

interests of our time. I have not yet been able like the Prime Minister,

to go round this exhibition and see the works of art that glorify your

walls; but I am led by him to expect that I shall see the pictures of

Liberal leaders, including M. Rochefort. [Laughter.] I am not sure

whether M. Rochefort will figure as a man of letters or as a Liberal

leader, but I can understand that his portrait would attract the Prime

Minister because M. Rochefort is a politician who was once a Liberal

leader, and who has now seen occasion to lose his faith in Parliamentary

government. [Laughter and cheers.] Nor have I seen the picture of "The

Flowing Tide," but I shall expect to find in that picture when I do see

it a number of bathing-machines in which, not the younger generation,

but the elder generation are incarcerated. [Laughter.] The younger

generation, as I understand, are waiting confidently--for the arrival of

the "Flowing Tide," and when it arrives, the elderly gentlemen who are

incarcerated in those machines [laughter] will be only too anxious for a

man and a horse to come and deliver them from their imminent peril.

[Laughter and cheers.]

I thought that I detected in the last words of your speech, in proposing

this toast, Mr. President, an accent of gentle reproach that any one

should desert the high and pleasant ways of literature for the turmoil

and the everlasting contention of public life. I do not suppose that

there has ever been a time in which there was less of divorce between

literature and public life than the present time. ["Hear! Hear!"] There

have been in the reign of the Queen two eminent statesmen who have

thrice had the distinction of being Prime Minister, and oddly enough,

one of those statesmen [Lord Derby] has left behind him a most spirited

version of Homer, while the other eminent statesman [William E.

Gladstone]--happily still among us, still examines the legends and the

significance of Homer. [Cheers.] Then when we come to a period nearer to

ourselves, and look at those gentlemen who have in the last six years

filled the office of Minister for Ireland, we find that no fewer than

three [George Otto Trevelyan, John Morley, and Arthur Balfour] were

authors of books before they engaged in the very ticklish business of

the government of men. ["Hear! Hear!"] And one of these three Ministers

for Ireland embarked upon his literary career--which promised ample

distinction--under the editorial auspices of another of the three. We

possess in one branch of the Legislature the author of the most

fascinating literary biography in our language. We possess also another

writer whose range of knowledge and of intellectual interest is so great

that he has written the most important book upon the Holy Roman Empire

and the most important book upon the American Commonwealth [James

Bryce]. [Cheers.]

The first canon in literature was announced one hundred years ago by an

eminent Frenchman who said that in literature it is your business to

have preferences but no exclusions. In politics it appears to be our

business to have very stiff and unchangeable preferences, and exclusion

is one of the systematic objects of our life. [Laughter and cheers.] In

literature, according to another canon, you must have a free and open

mind and it has been said: "Never be the prisoner of your own opinions."

In politics you are very lucky if you do not have the still harder

fate--(and I think that the gentlemen on the President's right hand will

assent to that as readily as the gentlemen who sit on his left) of being

the prisoner of other people's opinions. [Laughter.] Of course no one

can doubt for a moment that the great achievements of literature--those

permanent and vital works which we will never let die--require a

devotion as unceasing, as patient, as inexhaustible, as the devotion

that is required for the works that adorn your walls; and we have

luckily in our age--though it may not be a literary age--masters of

prose and masters of verse. No prose more winning has ever been written

than that of Cardinal Newman; no verse finer, more polished, more

melodious has ever been written than that of Lord Tennyson and Mr.

Swinburne. [Cheers.]

It seems to me that one of the greatest functions of literature at this

moment is not merely to produce great works, but also to protect the

English language--that noble, that most glorious instrument--against

those hosts of invaders which I observe have in these days sprung up. I

suppose that every one here has noticed the extraordinary list of names

suggested lately in order to designate motion by electricity [laughter];

that list of names only revealed what many of us had been observing for

a long time--namely, the appalling forces that are ready at a moment's

notice to deface and deform our English tongue. [Laughter.] These

strange, fantastic, grotesque, and weird titles open up to my prophetic

vision a most unwelcome prospect. I tremble to see the day approach--and

I am not sure that it is not approaching--when the humorists of the

headlines of American journalism shall pass current as models of

conciseness, energy, and color of style. [Cheers and laughter.]

Even in our social speech this invasion seems to be taking place in an

alarming degree and I wonder what the Pilgrim Fathers of the seventeenth

century would say if they could hear their pilgrim children of the

nineteenth century who come over here, on various missions, and among

others, "On the make." [Laughter.] This is only one of the thousand such

like expressions which are invading the Puritan simplicity of our

tongue. I will only say that I should like, for my own part, to see in

every library and in every newspaper office that admirable passage in

which Milton, who knew so well how to handle both the great instrument

of prose and the nobler instrument of verse--declared that next to the

man who furnished courage and intrepid counsels against an enemy he

placed the man who should enlist small bands of good authors to resist

that barbarism which invades the minds and the speech of men in methods

and habits of speaking and writing.

I thank you for having allowed me the honor of saying a word as to the

happiest of all callings and the most imperishable of all arts. [Loud

cheers.]

Modern Eloquence: Vol II, After-Dinner Speeches E-O · 第 201 / 212 题