THE NAVY

[Speech of John D. Long, Secretary of the Navy, at the banquet of the

Fall Festival Celebration, Chicago, October 9, 1899. The Secretary was

introduced by the toast-master, Hon. Melville E. Stone, to speak in

response to the toast, "The Navy."]

MR. PRESIDENT AND GENTLEMEN:--Your toast to the Navy is all the

more a compliment because you are a thousand miles from the sea. It

signifies the place that the Navy has in the hearts of all the people

and how much they all alike share its glories. It has always been dear

to the American heart, and has contributed some of the most brilliant

pages in American history; but its exploits during the recent war have

given it a stronger and broader hold than ever before. Besides, it is

not a department which pertains to any section of the country nor to any

class among the people; it is one of the fundamental elements of

American popular growth. It is as much the product of our schools, our

homes, and common life, as is the shop of the mechanic, the warehouse of

the merchant, the harvest of the farmer. Jack hails from the inland

hamlet as well as from the seaport town.

The Admiral commanding one of our great squadrons, winning a victory

unprecedented in naval history, is the son of a prominent financial

business man; another, the son of an Irish laborer, working in a ditch

by his father's side, went from it to the Naval academy. Every

congressional district in the Union is represented there by its cadet.

The result is that the splendid body of naval officers who to-day so

highly command the confidence and admiration of the people are

themselves the immediate representatives of the people, and of their

common intelligence, spirit and standards. Our late antagonist had

officers and men of undoubted bravery. But in education, versatility,

ability to plan and do, and to meet emergencies: in short, in what Mrs.

Stowe called "faculty," our superiority was such that the battle was won

the moment it began.

In this connection I remind myself that in Congress the Naval Committees

of the Senate and House are made up also of men from all parts of our

common country. That great branch of our government which nurses the

Navy and provides for it is also representative of all the people.

Indeed, your own great city, with all its tremendous commercial and

industrial interests, has contributed a member of that committee, who

has put his heart into our naval development, rendered signal service in

that behalf, and by his recent voluntary study of naval affairs abroad

has prepared himself for still more valuable work--your able

representative in Congress, and my good friend, George Edmund Foss.

I can the more properly, gentlemen, join with you in your appreciation

of the Navy because, although its head, I am yet only temporarily

connected with it and can look at it from the outside. I sometimes

think, however, that the great public, applauding the salient merits,

overlook others which are quite as deserving.

You cheer for the men behind the guns; you give swords and banquets here

and there to an Admiral--and both most richly deserve the tribute--but

remember that all up and down the line there are individuals whose names

never got to your ears--or, if so, are already half forgotten--who have

earned unfading laurels. No man in the Navy has rendered such service,

however great, that others were not ready to fill the place and do as

well. The Navy is full of heroes unknown to fame. Its great merit is the

professional spirit which runs through it; the high sense of duty, the

lofty standards of service to which its hearts are loyal and which make

them all equal to any duty.

Who sings the praises of the chiefs of the naval stations and bureaus of

the Navy department, who wept that there were no battles and glory for

them; and who, remaining at their departmental posts, made such

provision for the fitting out, the arming, the supplying, the feeding,

the coaling, the equipping of your fleets that the commanding officer

on the deck had only to direct and use the forces which these, his

brothers, had put in his hands?

Who repeats the names of the young officers who pleaded for Hobson's

chance to risk his life in the hull and hell of the Merrimac? Who

mentions the scores of seamen who begged to be of the immortal seven who

were his companions in that forlorn hope?

In the long watch before Santiago the terror of our great battleships

was the two Spanish torpedo-boat destroyers, those swift, fiendish

sharks of the sea, engines of death and destruction, and yet, when the

great battle came, it was the unprotected Gloucester, a converted yacht,

the former plaything and pleasure-boat of a summer vacation, which,

without hesitation or turning, attacked these demons of the sea and sunk

them both. I have always thought it the most heroic and gallant

individual instance of fighting daring in the war. It was as if some

light-clad youth, with no defence but his sword, threw himself into the

arena with armored gladiators and by his dash and spirit laid them low.

And yet who has given a sword or spread a feast to that purest flame of

chivalrous heroism, Richard Wainwright?

Who recalls all the still more varied services of our Navy--its exploits

and researches in the interest of science, its stimulus to international

commerce, its surveys in foreign harbors, its charting of the sea and

marking of the pathway of the merchant marine, its study of the stars,

its contributions--in short, to all the interests of an enlightened and

progressive country?

May I suggest, therefore, that with this broader view of our Navy, as

not an outside conception of our institutions, but an integral part of

them, it is a partial conception that criticises its recent development

and its continued developments in the future? It has not only given

dignity and variety of service and strength to your government, but

think how it is linked in with all your industrial interests, with the

employment of large bodies of labor, with the consumption of all sorts

of material stimulating marine construction, building docks, and

contributing to this business activity and prosperity which are the

features of this thrifty town. It is not too much to predict that the

development of our navy is the beginning also of a new era of our

merchant marine, in maritime construction, and, hence, in maritime

transportation, of the American bottom carrying the American flag again

on all the oceans of the globe.

In the war with Spain our fleet was ordered to Manila because there was

a Spanish fleet there, and every military interest demanded its capture

or destruction. When that was done, every military interest required,

not that our fleet be withdrawn, but that our hand on the enemy's throat

should there remain until his surrender. When that surrender came, and

with it the transfer of the sovereignty of those islands from Spain to

the United States, every consideration demanded that the President

should hold them up, not toss them into the caldron of anarchy, and when

violence began should restore order, yet stretching out always in his

hands the tender and opportunity for peace and beneficent government

until Congress in its wisdom shall determine what their future status

shall be. What more, or what less, should he do and do his duty?

[Applause.]

Modern Eloquence: Vol II, After-Dinner Speeches E-O · 第 159 / 212 题