THOMAS HOOD.

Thomas Hood was originally intended for business, and entered a

mercantile house; but the failure of his health, at fifteen years of

age, compelled him to leave it, and go to Scotland, where he remained

two years, with much gain to his body and his mind. On his return to

London, he applied himself to learn the art of engraving; but his

constitution would not allow him to pursue it. Yet what he did acquire

of this art, with his genius for comic observation, must have been of

excellent service to him in his subsequent career. This, at first, was

simply literary, in a subordinate connection with "The London Magazine."

His relation to this periodical gave him opportunities, which he did not

neglect, of knowing many of its brilliant contributors. Among these was

Charles Lamb, who took a strong liking to the youthful sub-editor, and,

doubtless, discovered a talent that in some points had resemblance to

his own. The influence of his conversation and companionship may have

brought Hood's natural qualities of mind into early growth, and helped

them into early ripeness. Striking as the difference was, in some

respects, between them, in other respects the likeness was quite as

striking. Both were playful in manner, but melancholy by constitution,

and in each there lurked an unsuspected sadness; both had tenderness in

their mirth, and mirth in their tenderness; and both were born punsters,

with more meaning in their puns than met the ear, and constantly

bringing into sudden and surprising revelation the wonderful mysteries

of words.

With a genius of so singular a cast, Hood was not destined to continue

long a subordinate. Almost with manhood he began to be an independent

workman of letters; and as such, through ever-varying gravities and

gayeties, tears and laughter, grimsicalities and whimsicalities, prose

and verse, he labored incessantly till his too early death. The whole

was truly and entirely "Hood's Own." In mind he owed no man anything.

Unfortunately, he did in money. That he might economize, and be free to

toil in order to pay, he went abroad, residing between four and five

years out of England, part of the time at Coblentz, in Rhenish Prussia,

and part at Ostend, in Belgium. The climate of Rhenish Prussia was bad

for his health, and the people were disagreeable to his feelings. The

change to Belgium was at first pleasant and an improvement; but complete

recovery soon seemed as far away as ever; nay, it was absolutely away

forever. But in the midst of his family--his wife, his little boy and

girl, most loving and most loved--bravely he toiled, with pen and

pencil, with head and heart; and while men held both their sides from

laughter, he who shook them held both his sides from pain; while tears,

kindly or comical, came at the touch of his genius into thousands of

eyes, eyes were watching and weeping in secret by his bed-side in the

lonely night, which, gazing through the cloud of sorrow on his thin

features and his uneasy sleep, took note that the instrument was fast

decaying which gave forth the enchantment and the charm of all this

mirthful and melancholy music. Thus, in bodily pain, in bodily weakness

even worse than pain, in pecuniary embarrassment worse than either,

worst of all, often distressed in mind as to means of support for his

family, he still persevered; his genius did not forsake him, nor did his

goodness; the milk of human kindness did not grow sour, nor the sweet

charities of human life turn into bitter irritations. But what a tragedy

the whole suggests, in its combination of gayety with grief, and in

the thought of laughter that must be created at the cost of sighs, of

merriment in which every grin has been purchased by a groan!

An anecdote which we once read, always, when we recall it, deeply

affects us. A favorite comic actor, on a certain evening, was hissed by

the audience, who had always before applauded him. He burst into tears.

He had been watching his dying wife, and had left her dead, as be came

upon the stage. This was his apology for imperfection in his part. Poor

Hood had also to unite comedy with tragedy,--not for a night, or a day,

or a week, but for months and years. He had to give the comedy to the

public, and keep the tragedy to himself; nor could he, if comedy failed

him, plead with the public the tragedy of his circumstances. _That_ was

nothing to the public. He must give pleasure to the public, and not

explanations and excuses. But genius, goodness, many friends, no enemy,

the consciousness of imparting enjoyment to multitudes, and to no man

wretchedness, a heart alive with all that is tender and gentle, and

strong to manful and noble purpose and achievement,--these are grand

compensations,--compensations for even more ills than Hood was heir to;

and with such compensations Hood was largely blessed. Though his funds

were nothing to the bounty of his spirit, yet he did not refuse to

himself the blessedness of giving. Want, to his eye of charity, was

neither native nor foreign, but _human_; and as _human_ he pitied it

always, and, as far as he could, relieved it. While abroad, he was

constantly doing acts of beneficence; and the burlesque style with

which, in his correspondence, he tries to disguise his own goodness,

while using the incidents as items to write about, is one of the most

delightful peculiarities in his delightful letters. The inimitable

combination of humanity and humor in these passages renders them equal

to the best things that Hood has anywhere written. To crown all, Hood

had happiness unalloyed in his children and his wife. Mrs. Hood seems

to have deserved to the utmost the abounding love which her husband

lavished on her. She was not only, as a devoted wife, a cheerer of

his heart, but, as a woman of accomplishment and ability, she was a

companion for his mind. Her judgment was as clear and sure as her

affection was warm and strong. Her letters have often a grave tenderness

and an insinuated humor hardly inferior to her husband's. But as she

must write from fact and not from fancy, what she writes naturally bears

the impression of her cares. Here is a passage from one of her latest

letters, which, half sadly, half amusingly, reminds us of Mrs. Primrose

and her "I'll-warrant" and "Between-ourselves" manner.

"Hood dines to-day," she writes, "with Doctor Bowring, in Queen Square.

He knew him well years ago in 'The London Magazine'; and he wrote, a few

days ago, to ask Hood to meet Bright and Cobden on business,--_I_ think,

to write songs for the League. I augur good from it. This comes of 'The

Song of the Shirt,' of which we hear something continually."

As an instance of her judgment, we may mention that she prophesied at

once all the success which followed this same "Song of the Shirt." When

read to her in manuscript,--"Now mind, Hood," said she, "mark my words,

this will tell wonderfully! It is one of the best things you ever

did." Her reference to "The Song" in her letter has a sort of pathetic

_naïveté_ in it; it shows that the thought with which she was concerned

was practical, not poetical,--not her husband's fame, but her household

cares. She was thinking of songs that would turn into substance,--of

"notes" that could be exchanged for cash,--of evanescent flame that

might be condensed into solid coal, which would, in turn, make the pot

boil,--and of music that could be converted into mutton. O ye entranced

bards, drunk with the god, seeing visions and dreaming dreams in the

third heaven, that is, the third story! O ye voluminous historians, who

live in the guilt and glory of the past, and are proud in making the

biggest and thickest books for the dust, cobwebs, and moths of the

future! O ye commentators, who delight to render obscurity more obscure,

and who assume that in a multitude of words, as in a multitude of

counsellors, there is wisdom! O ye critics, who vote yourselves the

Areopagites of Intellect, whose decrees confer immortality in the

Universe of Letters! O all ye that write or scribble,--all ye tribes,

both great and small, of pen-drivers and paper-scrapers!--know ye,

that, while ye are listening in your imaginative ambition to the praise

of the elect or the applause of nations, your wives are often counting

the coppers that are to buy the coming meal, alarmed at the approaching

rent-day, or trembling in apprehension of the baker's bill.

Hood, in 1840, returned to reside in England during the small remainder

of his life. For a few months he edited the "New Monthly," and then, for

a few months more, a magazine of his own. But the whole of this period

was filled with bodily and mental trials, of which it is painful to

read. Yet within this period it was that he wrote some of his finest

things, both laughable and serious. It is, however, to be remarked, it

was now he reached down to that well of tears which lay in the depth of

his nature. Always before, there had been misty exhalations from it,

that oozed up into the sunshine of his fancy, and that took all the

shapes of glisten or of gloom which his Protean genius gave them. In the

rapid eccentricities of cloud and coruscation, the source which supplied

to the varying forms so much of their substance was hidden or unminded.

But now the fountain of thought and tragedy had been readied, whence the

waters of sin and suffering spring forth clear and unalloyed in their

own deep loneliness, and we hear the gush and the murmur of their stream

in such monodies as "The Song of the Shirt," "The Lay of the Laborer,"

and "The Bridge of Sighs."

Hood died in 1845, and was then only forty-six or forty-seven years old.

Alike esteemed by the poor and the rich, both united to consecrate a

monument to his memory. Kindly should we ever think of those who make

our hearts and our tempers bright; who, without pomp of wisdom, help us

to a cheerfulness which no proud philosophy can give; who, in the motley

of checkered mirth and wit, sparkle on the resting-spots of life. Such

men are rare, and as valuable as they are rare. The world wants them

more than it wants heroes and victors: for mirth is better than

massacre; and it is surely better to hear laughter sounding aloud the

jubilee of the heart, than the shout of battle and yell of conquest.

Precious, then, are those whose genius brings pleasure to the bosom

and sunshine to the face; who not only call our thoughts into festive

action, but brighten our affections into generous feeling. Though we may

not loudly celebrate such men, we greatly miss them; and not on marble

monuments, but in our warmest memories, their names continue fresh. But

laugh and make laugh as they may, they, too, have the destiny of grief;

and unto them, as unto all men, come their passages of tragedy,--the

days of evil, the nights of waking, and the need of pity.

When Hood was near his death a pension of a hundred pounds a year was

settled on his wife, at the instance of Sir Robert Peel. The wife, so

soon to become a widow, did not long survive her husband; then, in 1847,

the pension was continued to their two orphan children, at the instance

of Lord John Russell. Politics and parties were forgotten, in gratitude

to an earnest lover of his kind; and the people, as well as the

government, in helping to provide for those whom he left behind, showed

that they had not forgotten one whose desire it was to improve even more

than to amuse them. And still we cannot but feel sad that there should

ever have been this need. Nor would there have been, had Hood had the

strength to carry him into the vast reading public which has arisen

since his death, and which it was not his fate to know. "The income,"

says his daughter, "which his works now produce to his children, might

then have prolonged his life for many years."

We have written more on the personal relations of Hood than we had

intended; but we have been carried on unwitttingly, while reading the

"Memorials" of him recently published and edited by his children. The

loving worth of the man, as therein revealed, made us slow to quit the

companionship of his character to discuss the qualities of his genius.

We trust that our time has not been misspent, morally or critically;

for, besides the moral good which we gain from the contemplation of an

excellent man, we enjoy also the critical satisfaction of learning that

whatever is best in literature comes out of that which is best in life.

We therefore close this section of our article with a bit of prose and a

bit of poetry, among Hood's "last things,"--personally and pathetically

characteristic of his nature and his genius.

"Dear Moir,[A]

"God bless you and yours, and goodbye! I drop these few lines, as in a

bottle from a ship water-logged and on the brink of foundering, being

in the last stage of dropsical debility; but, though suffering in body,

serene in mind. So, without reversing my union-jack, I await my last

lurch. Till which, believe me, dear Moir,

"Yours most truly,

"THOMAS HOOD."

[Footnote A: The _Delta_ of Blackwood]

The Atlantic Monthly, Volume 06, No. 37, November, 1860 A Magazine of Literature, Art, and Politics · 第 4 / 26 题