VIII

Could this be the case with all predictions? Were the prophecies of the

great prophets, the oracles of the sibyls, witches, pythonesses content

thus to reflect, translate, raise to the level of the intelligible world

the instinctive clairvoyance of the individuals or peoples that listened

to them? Let each accept the reply or the hypothesis which his own

experience suggests to him. I have given mine with the simplicity and

sincerity which a question of this nature demands.[2]

To resume my inquiry. In so far, then, as concerns that formidable

unknown which stretches before us, I found nothing conclusive, nothing

decisive; and yet, I repeat, it is almost incredible that we should not

know the Future. I can imagine that we stand opposite to it as though

opposite to a forgotten past. We might try to remember it. It would be a

question of inventing or re-discovering the road taken by that memory

which precedes us.

I can conceive that we are not qualified to know beforehand the

disturbances of the elements, the destiny of the planets of the earth,

of empires, peoples and races. All this does not touch us directly, and

we know it in the past thanks only to the artifices of history. But that

which regards us, that which is within our reach, that which is to

unfold itself within the little sphere of years, a secretion of our

spiritual organism, that envelops us in Time, even as the shell or the

cocoon envelops the mollusc or the insect in Space; that, together with

all the external events relating to it, is probably recorded in that

sphere. In any case, it would be much more natural that it were so

recorded than comprehensible that it were not. There we have realities

struggling with an illusion; and there is nothing to prevent us from

believing that, here as elsewhere, realities will end by overcoming

illusion. Realities are what will happen to us, having already happened

in the history that overhangs our own, the motionless and superhuman

history of the universe. Illusion is the opaque veil woven with the

ephemeral threads called Yesterday, To-day and To-Morrow, which we

embroider on those realities. But it is not indispensable that our

existence should continue the eternal dupe of that illusion. We may even

ask ourselves whether our extraordinary unfitness for knowing a thing so

simple, so incontestable, so perfect and so unnecessary as the Future,

would not form one of the greatest subjects for astonishment to an

inhabitant of another star who should visit us.

To-day, all this appears to us so profoundly impossible that we find it

difficult to imagine how the certain reality of the Future would refute

the objections which we make to it in the name of the organic illusion

of our minds. We say to it, for instance: If, at the moment of

undertaking an affair, we could know that its outcome would be

unfortunate, we should not undertake it; and, since it must be written

somewhere, in Time, before our question has been put, that the affair

will not take place, seeing that we abandon it, we could not, therefore,

foresee the outcome of that which will have no beginning.

So as not to lose ourselves in this road, which would lead us whither

nothing calls us, it will be enough for us to say that the Future, like

all that exists, is probably more coherent and more logical than the

logic of our imagination and that all our hesitations and uncertainties

are included in its provisions.

Moreover, we must not believe that the march of events would be

completely upset if we knew it beforehand. First, only they would know

the Future, or a part of the Future, who would take the trouble to learn

it; even as only they know the Past, or a part of their own Present, who

have the courage and the intelligence to examine it. We should quickly

accommodate ourselves to the lessons of this new science, even as we

have accommodated ourselves to those of history. We should soon make

allowance for the evils which we could not escape and for inevitable

evils. The wiser among us, for themselves, would lessen the sum total of

the latter; and the others would meet them half-way, even as now they go

to meet many certain disasters which are easily foretold. The amount of

our vexations would be somewhat decreased, but less than we hope; for

already our reason is able to foresee a portion of our Future, if not

with the material evidence that we dream of, at least with a moral

certainty that is often satisfying: yet we observe that the majority of

men derive hardly any profit from this easy foreknowledge. Such men

would neglect the counsels of the Future, even as they hear, without

following it, the advice of the Past.

The Double Garden · 第 58 / 114 题