III

I thought it curious to inquire where this science of the Future stands

to-day. It no longer has the splendour nor the hardihood of old. It no

longer forms part of the public and religious life of nations. The

Present and the Past reveal so many prodigies to us that these suffice

to amuse our thirst for marvels. Absorbed as we are in what is or was,

we have almost given up asking what might be or will be. However, the

old and venerable science, so deeply rooted in man's infallible

instinct, is not abandoned. It is no longer practised in broad daylight.

It has taken shelter in the darkest corners, in the most vulgar,

credulous, ignorant and despised environments. It employs innocent or

childish methods; nevertheless, it, too, has in a certain measure

evolved, like other things. It neglects the majority of the processes of

primitive divination; it has found others, often eccentric, sometimes

ludicrous, and has been able to profit by some few discoveries that were

by no means intended for it.

I have followed it into its dark retreats. I wished to see it, not in

books, but at work, in real life, and among the humble faithful who have

confidence in it and who daily apply to it for advice and encouragement.

I went to it in good faith: unbelieving, but ready to believe; without

prejudice and without a predetermined smile: for, if we must admit no

miracle blindly, it is worse blindly to laugh at it; and in every

obstinate error there lurks, usually, an excellent truth that awaits the

hour of birth.

The Double Garden · 第 54 / 114 题