CHAPTER X

DENMARK, SWEDEN, NORWAY, HOLLAND, AND LUXEMBURG

The reasons for the neutrality which the three Scandinavian kingdoms

have maintained in the Great European War are chiefly economic and

geographical. Neither one alone nor all three combined are strong

enough in men or money to take sides with either the Allies or the

Central European Powers. Furthermore through their continued

neutrality they have been able to reap a rich harvest by means of an

immensely extended trade with practically all of the belligerents,

especially, however, with England, Germany, and Russia. These

conditions of course influence chiefly the official attitude of these

countries, but have less influence on popular opinion which is more or

less subject to sentimental influences. In that direction both Denmark

and Norway lean toward the Allies, while Sweden leans toward the

Central European Powers. Denmark has never forgotten or forgiven the

mutilation which it suffered at the hands of Prussia and Austria in

1864, and which resulted in the loss of Schleswig-Holstein, a

comparatively large slice of Denmark. This resentment toward Germany

has been intensified since then by the severe measures which from time

to time have been taken against the inhabitants of northern Schleswig,

who have adhered consistently to their Danish language and customs.

Its ruling family also is closely related to the rulers of England and

Russia.

The latter may also be said of the ruling family of Norway, but in

the case of Norway matters have been somewhat complicated by its

peculiar relation to Sweden. Up to 1905 these two countries were

known as the United Kingdoms of Sweden and Norway and were governed

on the basis of a very close union. In that year, however, the union

was dissolved after the Norwegians had shown for many years previous

their dislike of existing conditions. After the dissolution they

chose as their king a Prince of Denmark who is married to a sister

of King George of England; this as well as the very fact that Sweden

is leaning toward Germany is chiefly responsible for Norway's

sentimental preference for the cause of the Allies.

Sweden's tendency to support the Central European Powers is based

primarily on its fear of and hatred for Russia. The former sentiment

is due to Russia's well-known desire for a port which is ice-free

all year around and which it could, of course, acquire by the

conquest of Sweden. The latter sentiment, which has always been

strong in Sweden, has its origin in Russia's conquest of the former

Swedish province of Finland and in the oppressive and most cruel

treatment which Russia has given to the populace of this unfortunate

country which consistently have tried to adhere to their Swedish

habits and civilization. The fact that the present Queen of Sweden

is a German princess, closely related to the imperial family as well

as to some of the other German reigning families, and that this

Queen of Sweden is very popular in her adopted country, undoubtedly

also had some bearing on Sweden's attitude toward the various

countries at war.

Like Portugal and Spain, Holland of to-day is only a mere shadow of

its past glory. Most of its colonial possessions have passed out of

its hands. Those, however, that still remain are chiefly in the Far

East and are very valuable, especially Java. The possession of these

colonies by as small a country as Holland, of course, raised many

difficult problems of a financial and political nature. As a result,

Holland's participation in international politics was naturally very

restricted, and the general policy of the country was to maintain

the strictest neutrality and to keep up friendly relations with the

rest of the world. Its neutrality in the present war is based on the

same reasons. Furthermore, public sentiment is rather anti-English,

partly as a result of the resentment of English aggression during

the Napoleonic wars, which almost ended in the loss to Holland of

its colonies, and partly as a result of the intense sympathy felt

for the Boers, who are of Dutch descent, during the South African

War. At the same time they have no particularly strong liking for

Germany, suspecting it of having designs on their absolute

independence, which the Dutch guard most jealously.

The history of Holland during the last fifty years is, therefore,

concerned chiefly with internal affairs, and covers few events of

international importance. Its chief claim to international fame

rests on its selection by the other civilized nations as the center

of the international peace conferences and the seat of the

International Court of Arbitration. On May 18, 1899, the First Peace

Conference assembled at The Hague at the invitation of Czar Nicholas

II of Russia. In it there participated, besides twenty-one European

states, the United States, Mexico, China, Japan, Persia, and Siam.

During sessions lasting over ten weeks international questions of

the greatest importance, chiefly relating to the conduct of war,

were discussed. As a result the convention adopted certain

resolutions and declarations which modified warfare on land and sea,

and regulated it by means of certain rules which were to be observed

by all signatories. It also created a permanent court of

arbitration, consisting of eminent jurists from all the countries

represented, before which international disputes were to be brought

for pacific settlement. At the suggestion of the United States

(1904) the czar invited the countries to a second peace conference,

which met on June 15, 1907. Besides the former signatories, all the

South American States were represented. Its results were similar to

those of the first conference, and as the years passed by the

various countries concluded among each other a total of over 150

arbitration treaties.

In spite of being the center of the modern peace movement, Holland

found it necessary for its own protection to keep up with the

general increase in armament which was carried on in Europe. In 1913

the Coast Defense Bill provided for the fortification of Flushing

and for the expenditure of a comparatively large sum, and created

considerable discussion and some ill feeling, especially in England.

The Duchy of Luxemburg is ruled by the same dynasty that now occupies

the throne of Holland, the House of Orange-Nassau. Until 1866 it was a

member of the North German Federation, but in 1867 a conference of

the powers, held at London, declared it to be neutral territory, and

ordered the demolition of its fortifications. At that time the

succession in both Holland and Luxemburg descended in the direct male

line only. William III was King of Holland and Grand Duke of

Luxemburg. In 1879 the king's only brother and his oldest son, and in

1881 the king's second son died. This left that branch of the house

without male heirs. In 1879 William III had married a second time, and

had chosen Emma, Princess of Waldeck-Pyrmont, one of the smallest

German states. In 1880 a daughter, the present Queen Wilhelmina, was

born. As the king was aging rapidly and was not likely to have any

further issue, it became necessary to change the law of succession, in

order to prevent Holland's throne from coming into the hands of the

next male member of the House of Orange-Nassau, the Duke of Nassau,

who was practically a German prince, and, therefore, not acceptable to

Holland's people. In 1884 it was arranged that in case of lack of male

issue the succession in Holland should descend to direct female heirs.

When, therefore, William III died in 1890 his minor daughter became

queen under the regency of Queen Emma. Luxemburg, however, descended

to the Duke of Nassau, who, upon his death was succeeded by his son,

and upon the latter's death by his granddaughter, the present Grand

Duchess Marie Adelaide. Queen Wilhelmina, the idol of her people,

assumed the reins of government upon reaching her majority in 1898

after her mother's skillful regency of eight years. In 1901 she

married a German prince, Henry, Duke of Mecklenburg. This marriage was

blessed with one daughter, Princess Juliana, who is heir apparent to

the throne of Holland. Otherwise, though, it did not prove very happy,

and, therefore, did certainly not increase Dutch friendship for

Germany.

The Story of the Great War, Volume 1 Introductions; Special Articles; Causes of War; Diplomatic and State Papers · 第 10 / 16 章