ON NAVAL TIMBER.
ON NAVAL TIMBER AND ARBORICULTURE; WITH CRITICAL NOTES ON
AUTHORS WHO HAVE RECENTLY TREATED THE SUBJECT OF PLANTING.
BY PATRICK MATTHEW.
LONDON:
LONGMAN, REES, ORME, BROWN, AND GREEN; AND
ADAM BLACK, EDINBURGH.
MDCCCXXXI.
NEILL & CO. PRINTERS,
Old Fishmarket, Edinburgh.
{v} PREFACE.
It may be thought presumptuous in a person who has never had the
curiosity to peruse the British classic authors on planting and
timber—EVELYN, HANBURY, MARSHALL, MILLER, PONTEY—to make experiment of
the public sufferance. The author does not, however, think any apology
necessary; as, if the public lose time unprofitably over his pages, he
considers the blame attachable to them, not to him. A writer does not
obtrude as a speaker does, but merely places his thoughts within reach.
As the subject, notwithstanding its great importance, might, _per se_,
be felt dry and {vi} insipid by the general reader, accustomed to the
luxuries of modern literature, the author has not scrupled to mix with
it such collateral matter as he thought might serve to correct the
aridity. The very great interest of the question regarding species,
variety, habit, has perhaps led him a little too wide.
There is one advantage in taking a subject of this kind, that few
professional (literary) critics can meddle with it, further than as
regards style and language, without exposing their own ignorance. Yet
will the author experience the highest pleasure in being instructed
and corrected, wherever his knowledge may be found defective, or
when speculation or misconception of facts have led him into error.
Knowledge and truth, is mental strength and health; ignorance and
error, weakness and {vii} disease: the man who pursues science for its
own sake, and not for the pride of possession, will feel more gratitude
towards the surgeon who dislodges a cataract from the mind’s eye, than
towards the one who repairs the defect of the bodily organ.
GOURDIE-HILL BY ERROL,
_Sept._ 10, 1830.
{ix} CONTENTS.
INTRODUCTION, . . . Page 1
PART I.—STRUCTURE OF VESSELS.
SECTION I.—PLANK.
Figure, dimensions, and quality of timber suitable, . . . 5
British trees suited for plank, . . . 7
Directions for training and pruning plank timber, . . . 8
SECTION II.—TIMBERS, . . . 14
Most suitable dimensions, . . . 18
Figures of bends and crooks, . . . 19
British trees suited for timbers, . . . 21
PART II.—BRITISH FOREST TREES SUITED FOR NAVAL PURPOSES.
Oak—Quercus, . . . 31
Spanish Chestnut—Castanea vulgaris, . . . 42
Beech-tree—Fagus sylvatica, . . . 48
Scotch Elm—Ulmus montana, . . . 50
English Elm—Ulmus campestris, . . . 54
Red-wood Willow—Salix fragilis, . . . 58
Red-wood Pine—Pinus, . . . 63
White Larch—Larix communis, pyramidalis, . . . 75
Investigation of the causes of the rot in larch, . . . 78
Soils and subsoils most suited for larch, . . . 82
Soils and subsoils where larch generally takes rot, . . . 86
Remarks on open draining, . . . 88
Bending and kneeing larch, . . . 90
New plan of forming larch roots advantageously into knees, . . . 94
Uses of larch, and value as a naval timber, . . . 97