Observ. LVII. _Of the _Eels_ in Vinegar._

Of these small Eels, which are to be found in divers sorts of Vinegar, I

have little to add besides their Picture, which you may find drawn in the

third Figure of the 25. _Scheme_: That is, they were shaped much like an

Eel, save only that their nose A, (which was a little more opacous then the

rest of their body) was a little sharper, and longer, in proportion to

their body, and the wrigling motion of their body seem’d to be onely

upwards and downwards, whereas that of Eels is onely side-wayes: They

seem’d to have a more opacous part about B, which might, perhaps, be their

Gills; it seeming always the same proportionate distant from their nose,

from which, to the tip of their tail, C, their body seem’d to taper.

Taking several of these out of their Pond of Vinegar, by the net of a small

piece of filtring Paper, and laying them on a black smooth Glass plate, I

found that they could wriggle and winde their body, as much almost as a

Snake, which made me doubt, whether they were a kind of Eal or Leech.

I shall add no other observations made on this minute Animal, being

prevented herein by many excellent ones already publish’d by the ingenious,

Doctor _Power_, among his _Microscopical_ Observations, save onely that a

quantity of Vinegar repleat with them being included in a small Viol, and

stop’d very close from the ambient air, all the included Worms in a very

short time died, as if they had been stifled.

And that their motion seems (contrary to what we may observe in the motion

of all other Infects) exceeding slow. But the reason of it seems plain, for

being to move to and fro after that manner which they do, by waving onely,

or wrigling their body; the tenacity, or glutinousness, and the density or

resistance of the fluid _medium_ becomes so exceeding sensible to their

extremely minute bodies, that it is to me indeed a greater wonder that they

move them so fast as they do, then that they move them no faster. For what

a vastly greater proportion have they of their superficies to their bulk,

then Eels or other larger Fishes, and next, the tenacity and density of the

liquor being much the same to be moved, both by the one and the other, the

resistance or impediment thence arising to the motions made through it,

must be almost infinitely greater to the small one then to the great. This

we find experimentally verify’d in the Air, which though a _medium_ a

thousand times more rarify’d then the water, the resistance of it to

motions made through it, is yet so sensible to very minute bodies, that a

Down-feather (the least of whose parts seem yet bigger then these Eels, and

many of them almost incomparably bigger, such as the quill and stalk) is

suspended by it, and carried to and fro as if it had no weight.

* * * * *

Observ. LVIII. _Of a new Property in the _Air_, and several other

transparent _Mediums_ nam’d _Inflection_, whereby very many considerable

_Phænomena_ are attempted to be solv’d, and divers other uses are hinted._

Since the Invention (and perfecting in some measure) of _Telescopes_, it

has been observ’d by several, that the Sun and Moon neer the Horizon, are

disfigur’d (losing that exactly-smooth terminating circular limb, which

they are observ’d to have when situated neerer the Zenith) and are bounded

with an edge every way (especially upon the right and left sides) ragged

and indented like a Saw: which inequality of their limbs, I have further

observ’d, not to remain always the same, but to be continually chang’d by a

kind of fluctuating motion, not unlike that of the waves of the Sea, so as

that part of the limb, which was but even now nick’d or indented in, is now

protuberant, and will presently be sinking again; neither is this all but

the whole body of the Luminaries, do in the _Telescope_, seem to be

depress’d and flatted, the upper, and more especially the under side

appearing neerer to the middle then really they are, and the right and left

appearing more remote: whence the whole _Area_ seems to be terminated by a

kind of Oval. It is further observ’d, that the body, for the most part,

appears red, or of some colour approaching neer unto it, as some kind of

yellow; and this I have always mark’d, that the more the limb is flatted or

ovalled, the more red does the body appear, though not always the contrary.

It is further observable, that both fix’d Stars and Planets, the neerer

they appear to the Horizon, the more red and dull they look, and the more

they are observ’d to twinkle; in so much, that I have seen the Dog-starr to

vibrate so strong and bright a radiation of light, as almost to dazle my

eyes, and presently, almost to disappear. It is also observable, that those

bright scintillations neer the Horizon, are not by much so quick and sudden

in their consecutions of one another, as the nimbler twinklings of Stars

neerer the Zenith. This is also notable, that the Starrs neer the Horizon,

are twinkled with several colours; so as sometimes to appear red, sometimes

more yellow, and sometimes blue, and this when the Starr is a pretty way

elevated above the Horizon. I have further, very often seen some of the

small Starrs of the fifth or sixth magnitude, at certain times to disappear

for a small moment of time, and again appear more conspicuous, and with a

greater luster. I have several times, with my naked eye, seen many smaller

Starrs, such as may be call’d of the seventh or eighth magnitude to appear

for a short space, and then vanish, which, by directing a small _Telescope_

towards that part they appear’d and disappear’d in; I could presently find

to be indeed small Starrs so situate, as I had seen them with my naked eye,

and to appear twinkling like the ordinary visible Stars; nay, in examining

some very notable parts of the Heaven, with a three foot Tube, me thought I

now and then, in several parts of the constellation, could perceive little

twinklings of Starrs, making a very short kind of apparition, and presently

vanishing, but noting diligently the places where they thus seem’d to play

at boe-peep, I made use of a very good twelve foot Tube, and with that it

was not uneasie to see those, and several other degrees of smaller Starrs,

and some smaller yet, that seem’d again to appear and disappear, and these

also by giving the same Object-glass a much bigger aperture, I could

plainly and constantly see appear in their former places; so that I have

observ’d some twelve several magnitudes of Starrs less then those of the

six magnitudes commonly recounted in the Globes.

It has been observ’d and confirm’d by the accuratest Observations of the

best of our modern Astronomers, that all the Luminous bodies appear above

the Horizon, when they really are below it. So that the Sun and Moon have

both been seen above the Horizon, whil’st the Moon has been in an Eclipse.

I shall not here instance in the great refractions, that the tops of high

mountains, seen at a distance, have been found to have; all which seem to

argue the Horizontal refraction, much greater then it is hitherto generally

believ’d.

I have further taken notice, that not onely the Sun, Moon and Starrs, and

high tops of mountains have suffer’d these kinds of refraction, but Trees,

and several bright Objects on the ground: I have often taken notice of the

twinkling of the reflections of the Sun from a Glass-window at a good

distance, and of a Candle in the night, but that is not so conspicuous, and

in observing the setting Sun, I have often taken notice of the tremulation

of the Trees and Bushes, as well as of the edges of the Sun. Divers of

these _Phænomena_ have been taken notice of by several, who have given

several reasons of them, but I have not yet met with any altogether

satisfactory, though some of their conjectures have been partly true, but

partly also false. Setting my self therfore upon the inquiry of these

_Phænomena_, I first endeavour’d to be very diligent in taking notice of

the several particulars and circumstances observable in them; and next, in

making divers particular Experiments, that might cleer some doubts, and

serve to determine, confirm, and illustrate the true and adæquate cause of

each; and upon the whole, I find much reason to think, that the true cause

of all these _Phænomena_ is from the _inflection_, or _multiplicate

refraction_ of those Rays of light within the body of the _Atmosphere_, and

that it does not proceed from a _refraction_ caus’d by any terminating

_superficies_ of the Air above, nor from any such exactly defin’d

_superficies_ within the body of the _Atmosphere_.

This Conclusion is grounded upon these two Propositions:

First, that a _medium_, whose parts are unequally _dense_, and mov’d by

various motions and transpositions as to one another, will produce all

these visible effects upon the Rays of light, without any other

_coefficient_ cause.

Secondly, that there is in the Air or _Atmosphere_ such a variety in the

constituent parts of it, both as to their _density_ and _rarity_, and as to

their divers mutations and positions one to another.

By _Density_ and _Rarity_, I understand a property of a transparent body,

that does either more or less refract a Ray of light (coming obliquely upon

its superficies out of a third _medium_) toward its perpendicular: As I

call Glass a more dense body then Water, and Water a more rare body then

Glass, because of the refractions (more or less deflecting towards the

perpendicular) that are made in them, of a Ray of light out of the Air that

has the same inclination upon either of their superficies.

So as to the business of Refraction, spirit of Wine is a more _dense_ body

then Water, it having been found by an accurate Instrument that measures

the angles of Refractions to Minutes that for the same refracted angle of

30°.00′. in both those _Mediums_, the angle of incidence in Water was but

41°.35′. but the angle of the incidence in the trial with spirit of Wine

was 42°.45′. But as to gravity, Water is a more _dense_ body then spirit of

Wine, for the proportion of the same Water, to the same very well rectify’d

spirit of Wine was, as 21. to 19.

So as to Refraction, Water is more Dense then Ice; for I have found by a

most certain Experiment, which I exhibited before divers illustrious

Persons of the _Royal Society_, that the Refraction of Water was greater

then that of Ice, though some considerable Authors have affirm’d the

contrary, and though the Ice be a very hard, and the Water a very fluid

body.

That the former of the two preceding Propositions is true, may be

manifested by several Experiments; As first, if you take any two liquors

differing from one another in density, but yet such as will readily mix: as

Salt Water, or Brine, & Fresh; almost any kind of Salt dissolv’d in Water,

and filtrated, so that it be cleer, spirit of Wine and Water; nay, spirit

of Wine, and spirit of Wine, one more highly rectify’d then the other, and

very many other liquors; if (I say) you take any two of these liquors, and

mixing them in a Glass Viol, against one side of which you have fix’d or

glued a small round piece of Paper, and shaking them well together (so that

the parts of them may be somewhat disturb’d and move up and down) you

endeavour to see that round piece of Paper through the body of the liquors,

you shall plainly perceive the Figure to wave, and to be indented much

after the same manner as the limb of the Sun through a _Telescope_ seems to

be, save onely that the mutations here, are much quicker. And if, in steed

of this bigger Circle, you take a very small spot, and fasten and view it

as the former, you will find it to appear much like the twinkling of the

Starrs, though much quicker: which two _Phænomena_, (for I shall take

notice of no more at present, though I could instance in multitudes of

others) must necessarily be caus’d by an _inflection_ of the Rays within

the terminating superficies of the compounded _medium_, since the surfaces

of the transparent body through which the Rays pass to the eye, are not at

all altered or chang’d.

This _inflection_ (if I may so call it) I imagine to be nothing else, but a

_multiplicate refraction_, caused by the unequal _density_ of the

constituent parts of the _medium_, whereby the motion, action or progress

of the Ray of light is hindred from proceeding in a streight line, and

_inflected_ or _deflected_ by a _curve_. Now, that it is a _curve_ line is

manifest by this Experiment: I took a Box, such as ADGE, in the first

_Figure_ of the 37. _Scheme_, whose sides ABCD, and EFGH, were made of two

smooth flat plates of Glass, then filling it half full with a very strong

solution of Salt, I filled the other half with very fair fresh water, then

exposing the opacous side, DHGC, to the Sun, I observ’d both the

_refraction_ and _inflection_ of the Sun beams, ID & KH, and marking as

exactly as I could, the points, P, N, O, M, by which the Ray, KH, passed

through the compounded _medium_, I found them to be in a _curve_ line; for

the parts of the _medium_ being continually more dense the neerer they were

to the bottom, the Ray _pf_ was continually more and more deflected

downwards from the streight line.

This Inflection may be mechanically explained, either by Monsieur _Des

Cartes_ principles by conceiving the Globuls of the third Element to find

less and less resistance against that side of them which is downwards, or

by a way, which I have further explicated in the Inquisition about Colours,

to be from an obliquation of the pulse of light, whence the under part is

continually promoted, and consequently refracted towards the perpendicular,

which cuts the Orbs at right angles. What the particular Figure of the

_Curve line_, describ’d by this way of light, is, I shall not now stand to

examine, especially since there may be so many sorts of it as there may be

varieties of the Positions of the _intermediate_ degrees of _density_ and

_rarity_ between the bottom and the top of the inflecting Medium.

I could produce many more Examples and Experiments, to illustrate and prove

this first Proposition, _viz._ that there is such a constitution of some

bodies as will cause inflection. As not to mention those I have observ’d in

_Horn_, _Tortoise-Shell_, _transparent Gums_, and _resinous Substances_:

The _veins_ of Glass, nay, of melted _Crystal_, found, and much complained

of by Glass-grinders, and others, might sufficiently demonstrate the truth

of it to any diligent Observator.

But that, I presume, I have by this Example given proof sufficient (_viz.

ocular demonstration_) to evince, that there is such a modulation, or

bending of the rayes of light, as I have call’d _inflection_, differing

both from _reflection_, and _refraction_ (since they are both made in the

superficies, this only in the middle); and likewise, that this is able or

sufficient to produce the effects I have ascribed to it.

It remains therefore to shew, that there is such a property in the Air, and

that it is sufficient to produce all the above mentioned _Phænomena_, and

therefore may be the principal, if not the only cause of them.

First, That there is such a property, may be proved from this, that the

parts of the Air are some of them more condens’d, others more rarified,

either by the differing heat, or differing pressure it sustains, or by the

somewhat heterogeneous vapours interspers’d through it. For as the Air is

more or less rarified, so does it more or less refract a ray of light (that

comes out of a denser medium) from the perpendicular. This you may find

true, if you make tryal of this Experiment.

Take a small Glass-bubble, made in the form of that in the second Figure of

the 37. _Scheme_, and by heating the Glass very hot, and thereby very much

rarifying the included Air, or, which is better, by rarifying a small

quantity of water, included in it, into vapours, which will expel the most

part, if not all the Air, and then sealing up the small neck of it, and

letting it cool, you may find, if you place it in a convenient Instrument,

that there will be a manifest difference, as to the refraction.

As if in this second Figure you suppose A to represent a small sight or

hole, through which the eye looks upon an object, as C, through the

Glass-bubble B, and the second sight L; all which remain exactly fixt in

their several places, the object C being so cized and placed, that it may

just seem to touch the upper and under edge of the hole L: and so all of it

be seen through the small Glass-ball of rarified Air; then by breaking off

the small seal’d neck of the Bubble (without at all stirring the sights,

object, or glass) and admitting the external Air, you will find your self

unable to see the utmost ends of the object; but the terminating rayes AE

and AD (which were before refracted to G and F by the rarified Air) will

proceed almost directly to I and H; which alteration of the rayes (seeing

there is no other alteration made in the Organ by which the Experiment is

tryed, save only the admission, or exclusion of the condens’d Air) must

necessarily be caused by the variation of the _medium_ contain’d in the

Glass B; the greatest difficulty in the making of which Experiment, is from

the uneven surfaces of the bubble, which will represent an uneven image of

the object.

Now, that there is such a difference of the upper and under parts of the

Air is clear enough evinc’d from the late improvement of the _Torricellian_

Experiment, which has been tryed at the tops and feet of Mountains; and may

be further illustrated, and inquired into, by a means, which some whiles

since I thought of, and us’d, for the finding by what degrees the Air

passes from such a degree of Density to such a degree of Rarity. And

another, for the finding what pressure was requisite to make it pass from

such a degree of Rarefaction to a determinate Density: Which Experiments,

because they may be useful to illustrate the present Inquiry, I shall

briefly describe.

[16] I took then a small Glass-pipe AB, about the bigness of a Swans quill,

and about four foot long, which was very equally drawn, so that, as far as

I could perceive, no one part was bigger then another: This Tube (being

open at both ends) I fitted into another small Tube DE, that had a small

bore just big enough to contain the small Pipe, and this was seal’d up at

one, and open at the other, end; about which open end I fastned a small

wooden box C with cement, so that filling the bigger Tube, and part of the

box, with Quicksilver, I could thrust the smaller Tube into it, till it

were all covered with the Quicksilver: Having thus done, I fastned my

bigger Tube against the side of a wall, that it might stand the steadier,

and plunging the small Tube cleer under the _Mercury_ in the box, I stopt

the upper end of it very fast with cement, then lifting up the small Tube,

I drew it up by a small pully, and a string that I had fastned to the top

of the Room, and found the height of the _Mercurial Cylinder_ to be about

twenty nine inches.

Then letting down the Tube again, I opened the top, and then thrust down

the small Tube, till I perceived the Quicksilver to rise within it to a

mark that I had plac’d just an inch from the top; and immediately clapping

on a small piece of cement that I had kept warm, I with a hot Iron seal’d

up the top very fast, then letting it cool (that both the cement might grow

hard, and more especially, that the Air might come to its temper, natural

for the Day I try’d the Experiment in) I observ’d diligently, and found the

included Air to be exactly an Inch.

Here you are to take notice, that after the Air is seal’d up, the top of

the Tube is not to be elevated above the superficies of the Quicksilver in

the box, till the surface of that within the Tube be equal to it, for the

Quicksilver (as I have elsewhere prov’d) being more heterogeneous to the

Glass then the Air, will not naturally rise up so high within the small

Pipe, as the superficies of the _Mercury_ in the box, and therefore you are

to observe, how much below the outward superficies of the _Mercury_ in the

box, that of the same in the Tube does stand, when the top being open, free

ingress is admitted to the outward Air.

Having thus done, I permitted the _Cylinder_, or small Pipe, to rise out of

the box, till I found the surface of the Quicksilver in the Pipe to be two

inches above that in the box, and found the Air to have expanded it self

but one sixteenth part of an inch; then drawing up the small pipe, till I

found the height of the Quicksilver within to be four inches above that

without, I observed the Air to be expanded only ⅐ of an inch more then it

was at first, and to take up the room of 1⅐ inch: then I raised the Tube

till the Cylinder was six inches high, and found the Air to take up 1²⁄₉

inches of room in the Pipe; then to 8, 10, 12. &c. the expansion of the Air

that I found to each of which Cylinders are set down in the following

Table; where the first row signifies the height of the _Mercurial

Cylinder_; the next, the expansion of the Air; the third, the pressure of

the _Atmosphere_, or the highest _Cylinder_ of _Mercury_, which was then

neer thirty inches: The last signifies the force of the Air so expanded,

which is found by substracting the first row of numbers out of the third;

for having found, that the outward Air would then keep up the Quicksilver

to thirty inches, look whatever of that height is wanting must be

attributed to the Elater of the Air depressing. And therefore having the

Expansion in the second row, and the height of the subjacent _Cylinder_ of

_Mercury_ in the first, and the greatest height of the _Cylinder_ of

_Mercury_, which of it self counterballances the whole pressure of the

_Atmosphere_; by substracting the numbers of the first row out of the

numbers of the third, you will have the measure of the _Cylinders_ so

deprest, and consequently the force of the Air, in the several Expansions,

registred.

The height of the The Expansion The height of The strength

Cylinder of Mercury, of the Air. the Mercury of the Elater

that, together with that counter- of the expanded

the Elater of the ballanc’d the Air.

included Air, Atmosphere.

ballanced the

pressure of the

Atmosphere.

---------- ---------- ---------- ----------

00 01 30 30

02 01¹⁄₁₆ 30 28

04 01⅐ 30 26

06 01²⁄₉ 30 24

08 01⅓ 30 22

10 01½ 30 20

12 01⅔ 30 18

14 01⅚ 30 16

16 02²⁄₂₇ 30 14

18 02⁴⁄₉ 30 12

20 03 30 10

22 03⁷⁄₉ 30 8

24 05⁷⁄₁₈ 30 6

25 06⅔ 30 5

26 08½ 30 4

26¼ 09½ 30 3¾

26½ 10¾ 30 3½

26¾ 13 30 3¼

27 15½ 30 3

I had several other Tables of my Observations, and Calculations, which I

then made; but it being above a twelve month since I made them; and by that

means having forgot many circumstances and particulars, I was resolved to

make them over once again, which I did _August_ the second 1661. with the

very same Tube which I used the year before, when I first made the

Experiment (for it being a very good one, I had carefully preserv’d it:)

And after having tryed it over and over again; and being not well satisfied

of some particulars, I, at last, having put all things in very good order,

and being as attentive, and observant, as possibly I could, of every

circumstance requisite to be taken notice of, did register my several

Observations in this following Table. In the making of which, I did not

exactly follow the method that I had used at first; but, having lately

heard of Mr. _Townly_’s _Hypothesis_, I shap’d my course in such sort, as

would be most convenient for the examination of that _Hypothesis_; the

event of which you have in the latter part of the last Table.

The other Experiment was, to find what degrees of force were requisite to

compress, or condense, the Air into such or such a bulk.

The manner of proceeding therein was this: I took a Tube about five foot

long, one of whose ends was sealed up, and bended in the form of a

_Syphon_, much like that represented in the fourth Figure of the 37.

_Scheme_, one side whereof AD, that was open at A, was about fifty inches

long, the other side BC, shut at B, was not much above seven inches long,

then placing it exactly perpendicular, I pour’d in a little Quicksilver,

and found that the Air BC was 6⅞ inches, or very near to seven; then

pouring in Quicksilver at the longer Tube, I continued filling of it till

the Air in the shorter part of it was contracted into half the former

dimensions, and found the height exactly nine and twenty inches; and by

making several other tryals, in several other degrees of condensation of

the Air, I found them exactly answer the former _Hypothesis_.

But having (by reason it was a good while since I first made) forgotten

many particulars, and being much unsatisfied in others, I made the

Experiment over again, and, from the several tryals, collected the former

part of the following Table: Where in the row next the left hand 24.

signifies the dimensions of the Air, sustaining only the pressure of the

_Atmosphere_, which at that time was equal to a _Cylinder_ of _Mercury_ of

nine and twenty inches: The next Figure above it (20) was the dimensions of

the Air induring the first compression, made by a _Cylinder_ of _Mercury_

5³⁄₁₆ high, to which the pressure of the _Atmosphere_ nine and twenty

inches being added, the elastick strength of the Air so comprest will be

found 34³⁄₁₆, &c.

_A Table of the Elastick power of the Air, both Experimentally and

Hypothetically calculated, according to its various Dimensions._

The dimensions The height The Mercurial The sum or What they

of the included of the Cylinder difference ought to

Air. Mercurial added, or of these be according

Cylinder taken from two to the

counter- the former. Cylinders. Hypothesis.

pois’d

by the

Atmosphere.

---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------

12 29 + 29 = 58 58

13 29 + 24¹¹⁄₁₆ = 53¹¹⁄₁₆ 53⁷⁄₁₃

14 29 + 20³⁄₁₆ = 49³⁄₁₆ 49⁵⁄₇

16 29 + 14 = 43 43½

18 29 + 9⅛ = 38⅛ 38⅔

20 29 + 5³⁄₁₆ = 34³⁄₁₆ 34⅘

24 29 0 = 29 29

48 29 − 14⅝ = 14⅜ 14½

96 29 − 22⅛ = 6⅞ 7²⁄₈

192 29 − 25⅝ = 3⅜ 3⅝

384 29 − 27²⁄₈ = 1⁶⁄₈ 1⁷⁄₁₆

576 29 − 27⅞ = 1⅛ 1⁵⁄₂₄

768 29 − 28⅛ = 0⅞ 0[7¼]⁄₈

960 29 − 28⅜ = 0⅝ 0[5⅘]⁄₈

1152 29 − 28⁷⁄₁₆ = 0⁹⁄₁₆ 0¹⁰⁄₁₆

From which Experiments, I think, we may safely conclude, that the Elater of

the Air is reciprocal to its extension, or at least very neer. So that to

apply it to our present purpose (which was indeed the chief cause of

inventing these wayes of tryal) we will suppose a _Cylinder_ indefinitely

extended upwards, [I say a _Cylinder_, not a piece of a _Cone_, because, as

I may elsewhere shew in the Explication of Gravity, that _triplicate_

proportion of the shels of a Sphere, to their respective diameters, I

suppose to be removed in this case by the decrease of the power of Gravity]

and the pressure of the Air at the bottom of this _Cylinder_ to be strong

enough to keep up a _Cylinder_ of _Mercury_ of thirty inches: Now because

by the most accurate tryals of the most illustrious and incomparable Mr.

_Boyle_, published in his deservedly famous Pneumatick Book, the weight of

Quicksilver, to that of the Air here below, is found neer about as fourteen

thousand to one: If we suppose the parts of the _Cylinder_ of the

_Atmosphere_ to be every where of an equal density, we shall (as he there

deduces) find it extended to the height of thirty five thousand feet, or

seven miles: But because by these Experiments we have somewhat confirm’d

the hypothesis of the reciprocal proportion of the Elaters to the

Extensions we shall find, that by supposing this _Cylinder_ of the

_Atmosphere_ divided into a thousand parts, each of which being equivalent

to thirty five feet, or seven geometrical paces, that is, each of these

divisions containing as much Air as is suppos’d in a _Cylinder_ neer the

earth of equal diameter, and thirty five foot high, we shall find the

lowermost to press against the surface of the Earth with the whole weight

of the above mentioned thousand parts; the pressure of the bottom of the

second against the top of the first to be 1000 − 1 = 999. of the third

against the second to be 1000 − 2 = 998. of the fourth against the third to

be 1000 − 3 = 997. of the uppermost against the 999. or that next below it,

to be 1000 − 999 = 1. so that the extension of the lowermost next the

Earth, will be to the extension of the next below the uppermost, as 1. to

999. for as the pressure sustained by the 999. is to the pressure sustain’d

by the first, so is the extension of the first to the extension of the 999.

so that, from this hypothetical calculation, we shall find the Air to be

indefinitely extended: For if we suppose the whole thickness of the Air to

be divided, as I just now instanced, into a thousand parts, and each of

those under differing Dimensions, or Altitudes, to contain an equall

quantity of Air, we shall find, that the first _Cylinder_, whose Base is

supposed to lean on the Earth, will be found to be extended 35³⁵⁄₉₉₉ foot;

the second equal Division, or _Cylinder_, whose _basis_ is supposed to lean

on the top of the first, shall have its top extended higher by 35⁷⁰⁄₉₉₈

the third 35¹⁰⁵⁄₉₉₇ the fourth 35¹⁴⁰⁄₉₉₆ and so onward, each equal

quantity of Air having its dimensions measured by 35. and some additional

number exprest alwayes in the manner of a fraction, whose numerator is

alway the number of the place multipli’d by 35. and whose denominator is

alwayes the pressure of the _Atmosphere_ sustain’d by that part, so that by

this means we may easily calculate the height of 999. divisions of those

1000. divisions, I suppos’d; whereas the uppermost may extend it self more

then as high again, nay, perhaps indefinitely, or beyond the Moon; for the

Elaters and Expansions being in reciprocal proportions, since we cannot yet

find the _plus ultra_, beyond which the Air will not expand it self, we

cannot determine the height of the Air: for since, as we have shewn, the

proportion will be alway as the pressure sustain’d by any part is to 35. so

1000. to the expansion of that part; the multiplication or product

therefore of the pressure, and expansion, that is, of the two extream

proportionals, being alwayes equal to the product of the means, or 35000.

it follows, since that Rectangle or Product may be made up of the

multiplication of infinite diversities of numbers, that the height of the

Air is also indefinite; for since (as far as I have yet been able to try)

the Air seems capable of an indefinite Expansion, the pressure may be

decreased in _infinitum_, and consequently its expansion upwards indefinite

also.

There being therefore such a difference of density, and no Experiment yet

known to prove a _Saltus_, or skipping from one degree of rarity to another

much differing from it, that is, that an upper part of the Air should so

much differ from that immediately _subjacent_ to it, as to make a distinct

superficies, such as we observe between the Air and Water, &c. But it being

more likely, that there is a continual increase of rarity in the parts of

the Air, the further they are removed from the surface of the Earth: It

will hence necessarily follow, that (as in the Experiment of the salt and

fresh Water) the ray of Light passing obliquely through the Air also, which

is of very different density, will be continually, and infinitely

inflected, or bended, from a streight, or direct motion.

This granted, the reason of all the above recited _Phænomena_, concerning

the appearance of the Celestial Bodies, will very easily be deduced. As,

First, The redness of the Sun, Moon, and Stars, will be found to be caused

by the inflection of the rays within the _Atmosphere_. That it is not

really in or near the luminous bodies, will, I suppose, be very easily

granted, seeing that this redness is observable in several places differing

in Longitude, to be at the same time different, the setting and rising Sun

of all parts being for the most part red:

And secondly, That it is not meerly the colour of the Air interpos’d, will,

I suppose, without much more difficulty be yielded, seeing that we may

observe a very great _interstitium_ of Air betwixt the Object, and the Eye,

makes it appear of a dead blew, far enough differing from a red, or yellow.

But thirdly, That it proceeds from the refraction, or inflection, of the

rays by the _Atmosphere_, this following Experiment will, I suppose,

sufficiently manifest.

Take a sphærical Crystalline Viol, such as is describ’d in the fifth Figure

ABCD, and, having fill’d it with pure clear Water, expose it to the Sun

beams; then taking a piece of very fine _Venice_ Paper, apply it against

that side of the Globe that is opposite to the Sun, as against the side BC,

and you shall perceive a bright red Ring to appear, caus’d by the

refraction of the Rays, AAAA, which is made by the Globe; in which

Experiment, if the Glass and Water be very cleer, so that there be no Sands

nor bubbles in the Glass, nor dirt in the Water, you shall not perceive any

appearance of any other colour. To apply which Experiment, we may imagine

the _Atmosphere_ to be a great transparent Globe, which being of a

substance more dense then the other, or (which comes to the same) that has

its parts more dense towards the middle, the Sun beams that are tangents,

or next within the tangents of this Globe, will be refracted or inflected

from their direct passage towards the center of the Globe, whence,

according to the laws of refractions made in a triangular _Prism_, and the

generation of colour set down in the description of Muscovi-glass there

must necessarily appear a red colour in the _transitus_ or passage of those

tangent Rays. To make this more plain, we will suppose (in the sixth

_Figure_) ABCD, to represent the Globe of the _Atmosphere_, EFGH to

represent the opacous Globe of the Earth, lying in the midst of it, neer to

which, the parts of the Air, sustaining a very great pressure, are thereby

very much condens’d, from whence those Rays that are by inflection made

tangents to the Globe of the Earth, and those without them, that pass

through the more condens’d part of the _Atmosphere_, as suppose between A

and E, are by reason of the inequality of the _medium_, inflected towards

the center, whereby there must necessarily be generated a red colour, as is

more plainly shewn in the former cited place; hence whatsoever opacous

bodies (as vapours, or the like) shall chance to be elevated into those

parts, will reflect a red towards the eye; and therefore those evenings and

mornings appear reddest, that have the most store of vapours and halituous

substances exhaled to a convenient distance from the Earth; for thereby the

inflection is made the greater, and thereby the colour also the more

intense; and several of those exhalations being opacous, reflect several of

those Rays, which, through an _Homogeneous_ transparent _medium_ would pass

unseen; and therefore we see, that when there chances to be any clouds

situated in those Regions they reflect a strong and vivid red. Now, though

one great cause of the redness may be this inflection, yet I cannot wholly

exclude the colour of the vapours themselves, which may have something of

redness in them, they being partly nitrous; and partly fuliginous; both

which steams tinge the Rays that pass through them, as is made evident by

looking at bodies through the fumes of _Aqua fortis_ or spirit of _Nitre_

[as the newly mentioned Illustrious Person has demonstrated] and also

through the smoak of a Fire or Chimney.

Having therefore made it probable at least, that the morning and evening

redness may partly proceed from this inflection or refraction of the Rays,

we shall next shew how the Oval Figure will be likewise easily deduced.

Suppose we therefore, EFGH in the sixth _Figure_ of the 37. _Scheme_, to

represent the Earth; ABCD, the _Atmosphere_; EI, and EL, two Rays coming

from the Sun, the one from the upper, the other from the neather Limb,

these Rays, being by the _Atmosphere_ inflected, appear to the eye at E, as

if they had come from the points, N and O; and because the Ray L has a

greater inclination upon the inequality of the _Atmosphere_ then I,

therefore must it suffer a greater inflection, and consequently be further

elevated above its true place, then the Ray I, which has a less

inclination, will be elevated above its true place; whence it will follow,

that the lower side appearing neerer the upper then really it is, and the

two _lateral_ sides, _viz._ the right and left side, suffering no sensible

alteration from the inflection, at least what it does suffer, does rather

increase the visible Diameter then diminish it, as I shall shew by and by,

the Figure of the luminous body must necessarily appear somewhat

_Elliptical_.

This will be more plain, if in the seventh _Figure_ of the 37. _Scheme_ we

suppose AB to represent the sensible Horizon; CDEF, the body of the Sun

really below it; GHIK, the same appearing above it, elevated by the

inflection of the _Atmosphere_: For if, according to the best observation,

we make the visible Diameter of the Sun to be about three or four and

thirty minutes, and the Horizontal refraction according to _Ticho_ be

thereabout, or somewhat more, the lower limb of the Sun E, will be elevated

to I; but because, by his account, the point C will be elevated but 29.

minutes, as having not so great an inclination upon the inequality of the

Air, therefore IG, which will be the apparent refracted perpendicular

Diameter of the Sun, will be less then CG, which is but 29. minutes, and

consequently six or seven minutes shorter then the unrefracted apparent

Diameter. The parts, D and F, will be likewise elevated to H and K, whose

refraction, by reason of its inclination, will be bigger then that of the

point C, though less then that of E; therefore will the semidiameter IL, be

shorter then LG, and consequently the under side of the appearing Sun more

flat then the upper.

Now, because the Rays from the right and left sides of the Sun, &c. have

been observ’d by _Ricciolo_ and _Grimaldus_, to appear more distant one

from another then really they are, though (by very many Observations that I

have made for that purpose, with a very good _Telescope_, fitted with a

divided Ruler) I could never perceive any great alteration, yet there being

really some, it will not be amiss, to shew that this also proceeds from the

refraction or inflection of the _Atmosphere_; and this will be manifest, if

we consider the _Atmosphere_ as a transparent Globe, or at least a

transparent shell, encompassing an opacous Globe, which, being more dense

then the _medium_ encompassing it, refracts or inflects all the entring

parallel Rays into a point or focus, so that wheresoever the Observator is

plac’d within the _Atmosphere_, between the focus and the luminous body,

the _lateral_ Rays must necessarily be more converg’d towards his eye by

the refraction or inflection, then they would have been without it; and

therefore the Horizontal Diameter of the luminous body must necessarily be

augmented.

This might be more plainly manifest to the eye by the sixth _Figure_; but

because it would be somwhat tedious, and the thing being obvious enough to

be imagin’d by any one that attentively considers it, I shall rather omit

it, and proceed to shew, that the mass of Air neer the surface of the

Earth, consists, or is made up, of parcels, which do very much differ from

one another in point of density and rarity; and consequently the Rays of

light that pass through them will be variously inflected, here one way, and

there another, according as they pass so or so through those differing

parts; and those parts being always in motion, either upwards or downwards,

or to the right or left, or in some way compounded of these, they do by

this their motion inflect the Rays, now this way, and presently that way.

This irregular, unequal and unconstant inflection of the Rays of light, is

the reason why the limb of the _Sun_, _Moon_, _Jupiter_, _Saturn_, _Mars_,

and _Venus_, appear to wave or dance; and why the body of the Starrs appear

to tremulate or twinkle, their bodies, by this means, being sometimes

magnify’d, and sometimes diminished; sometimes elevated, otherwhiles

depress’d; now thrown to the right hand, and then to the left.

And that there is such a property or unequal distribution of parts, is

manifest from the various degrees of heat and cold that are found in the

Air; from whence will follow a differing density and rarity, both as to

quantity and refraction; and likewise from the vapours that are interpos’d,

(which, by the way, I imagine, as to refraction or inflection, to do the

same thing, as if they were rarify’d Air; and that those vapours that

ascend, are both lighter, and less dense, then the ambient Air which boys

them up; and that those which descend, are heavier and more dense) The

first of these may be found true, if you take a good thick piece of Glass,

and heating it pretty hot in the fire, lay it upon such another piece of

Glass, or hang it in the open Air by a piece of Wire, then looking upon

some far distant Object (such as a Steeple or Tree) so as the Rays from

that Object pass directly over the Glass before they enter your eye, you

shall find such a tremulation and wavering of the remote Object, as will

very much offend your eye: The like tremulous motion you may observe to be

caus’d by the ascending steams of Water, and the like. Now, from the first

of these it is manifest, that from the rarifaction of the parts of the Air,

by heat, there is caus’d a differing refraction, and from the ascension of

the more rarify’d parts of the Air, which are thrust up by the colder, and

therefore more condens’d and heavie, is caus’d an undulation or wavering of

the Object; for I think, that there are very few will grant, that Glass, by

as gentle a heat as may be endur’d by ones hand, should send forth any of

its parts in steams or vapours, which does not seem to be much wasted by

that violent fire of the green Glass-house; but, if yet it be doubted, let

Experiment be further made with that body that is accounted, by Chymists

and others, the most ponderous and fix’d in the world; for by heating of a

piece of Gold, and proceeding in the same manner, you may find the same

effects.

This trembling and shaking of the Rays, is more sensibly caus’d by an

actual flame, or quick fire, or anything else heated glowing hot; as by a

Candle, live Coal, red-hot Iron, or a piece of Silver, and the like: the

same also appears very conspicuous, if you look at an Object betwixt which

and your eye, the rising smoak of some Chimney is interpos’d; which brings

into my mind what I had once the opportunity to observe, which was, the Sun

rising to my eye just over a Chimney that sent forth a copious steam of

smoak; and taking a short _Telescope_, which I had then by me, I observ’d

the body of the Sun, though it was but just peep’d above the Horizon, to

have its underside, not onely flatted, and press’d inward, as it usually is

when neer the Earth; but to appear more protuberant downwards then if it

had suffered no refraction at all; and besides all this, the whole body of

the Sun appear’d to tremble or dance, and the edges or limb to be very

ragged or indented, undulating or waving, much in the manner of a flag in

the Wind.

This I have likewise often observ’d in a hot Sunshiny Summer’s day, that

looking on an Object over a hot stone, or dry hot earth, I have found the

Object to be undulated or shaken, much after the same manner. And if you

look upon any remote Object through a _Telescope_ (in a hot Summer’s day

especially) you shall find it likewise to appear tremulous. And further, if

there chance to blow any wind, or that the air between you and the Object

be in a motion or current, whereby the parts of it, both rarify’d and

condens’d, are swiftly remov’d towards the right or left, if then you

observe the Horizontal ridge of a Hill far distant, through a very good

_Telescope_, you shall find it to wave much like the Sea, and those waves

will appear to pass the same way with the wind.

From which, and many other Experiments, ’tis cleer that the lower Region of

the Air, especially that part of it which lieth neerest to the Earth, has,

for the most part, its constituent parcels variously agitated, either by

heat or winds, by the first of which, some of them are made more rare, and

so suffer a less refraction; others are interwoven, either with ascending

or descending vapours; the former of which being more light, and so more

rarify’d, have likewise a less refraction; the latter being more heavie,

and consequently more dense, have a greater.

Now, because that heat and cold are equally diffus’d every way; and that

the further it is spread, the weaker it grows; hence it will follow, that

the most part of the under Region of the Air will be made up of several

kinds of _lentes_, some whereof will have the properties of _Convex_,

others of _Concave_ _glasses_, which, that I may the more intelligibly make

out, we will suppose in the eighth _Figure_ of the 37. _Scheme_, that A

represents an ascending vapour, which, by reason of its being somewhat

_Heterogeneous_ to the ambient Air, is thereby thrust into a kind of

Globular form, not any where terminated, but gradually finished, that is,

it is most rarify’d in the middle about A. somewhat more condens’d about

BB, more then that about CC; yet further, about DD, almost of the same

density with the ambient Air about EE;, and lastly, inclosed with the more

dense Air FF, so that from A, to FF, there is a continual increase of

density. The reason of which will be manifest, if we consider the rising

vapour to be much warmer then the ambient heavie Air; for by the coldness

of the ambient Air, the shell EE will be more refrigerated then DD, and

that then CC, which will be yet more then BB, and that more then A; so that

from F to A, there is a continual increase of heat, and consequently of

rarity; from whence it will necessarily follow, that the Rays of light will

be inflected or refracted in it, in the same manner as they would be in a

_Concave-glase_; for the Rays _GKI_, _GKI_ will be inflected by _GKH_,

_GKH_, which will easily follow from what I before explained concerning the

inflection of the _Atmosphere_.

On the other side, a descending vapour, or any part of the air included by

an ascending vapour, will exhibit the same effects with a _Convex lens_;

for, if we suppose, in the former Figure, the quite contrary constitution

to that last describ’d; that is, the ambient Air FF being hotter then any

part of that matter within any circle, therefore the coldest part must

necessarily be A, as being farthest remov’d from the heat, all the

intermediate spaces will be gradually discriminated by the continuall

mixture of heat and cold, so that it will be hotter at EE, then DD, in DD

then CC, in CC then BB, and in BB then A. From which, a like refraction and

condensation will follow, and consequently a lesser or greater refraction,

so that every included part will refract more then the including, by which

means the Rays, GKI, GKI, coming from a Starr, or some remote Object, are

so inflected, that they will again concurr and meet, in the point M. By the

interposition therefore of this desending vapour the visible body of the

Star, or other Object, is very much augmented, as by the former it was

diminished.

From the quick consecutions of these two, one after another, between the

Object and your eye, caused by their motion upwards or downwards,

proceeding from their levity or gravity, or to the right or left,

proceeding from the wind, a Starr may appear, now bigger, now less, then

really it would otherwise without them; and this is that property of a

Starr, which is commonly call’d twinkling, or scintillation.

The reason why a Star will now appear of one colour, now of another, which

for the most part happens when ’tis neer the Horizon, may very easily be

deduc’d from its appearing now in the middle of the vapour, other whiles

neer the edge; for if you look against the body of a Starr with a

_Telescope_ that has a pretty deep _Convex_ Eye-glass, and so order it,

that the Star may appear sometimes in one place, and sometimes in another

of it; you may perceive this or that particular colour to be predominant in

the apparent Figure of the Starr, according as it is more or less remote

from the middle of the _Lens_. This I had here further explain’d, but that

it does more properly belong to another place.

I shall therefore onely add some few Quæries, which the consideration of

these particulars hinted, and so finish this Section.

And the first I shall propound is, Whether there may not be made an

artificial transparent body of an exact Globular Figure that shall so

inflect or refract all the Rays, that, coming from one point, fall upon any

_Hemisphere_ of it; that every one of them may meet on the opposite side,

and cross one another exactly in a point; and that it may do the like also

with all the Rays that, coming from a _lateral_ point, fall upon any other

_Hemisphere_; for if so, there were to be hoped a perfection of

_Dioptricks_, and a transmigration into heaven, even whil’st we remain here

upon earth in the flesh, and a descending or penetrating into the center

and innermost recesses of the earth, and all earthly bodies; nay, it would

open not onely a cranney, but a large window (as I may so speak) into the

Shop of Nature, whereby we might be enabled to see both the tools and

operators, and the very manner of the operation it self of Nature; this,

could it be effected, would as farr surpass all other kind of perspectives

as the vast extent of Heaven does the small point of the Earth, which

distance it would immediately remove, and unite them, as ’twere, into one,

at least, that there should appear no more distance between them then the

length of the Tube, into the ends of which these Glasses should be

inserted: Now, whether this may not be effected with parcels of Glass of

several densities, I have sometimes proceeded so farr as to doubt (though

in truth, as to the general, I have wholly despair’d of it) for I have

often observ’d in Optical Glasses a very great variety of the parts, which

are commonly called Veins; nay, some of them round enough (for they are for

the most part, drawn out into strings) to constitute a kind of _lens_.

This I should further proceed to hope, had any one been so inquisitive as

to have found out the way of making any transparent body, either more dense

or more rare, for then it might be possible to compose a Globule that

should be more dense in the middle of it, then in any other part, and to

compose the whole bulk, so as that there should be a continual gradual

transition from one degree of density to another; such as should be found

requisite for the desired inflection of the _transmigrating_ Rays; but of

this enough at present, because I may say more of it when I set down my own

Trials concerning the melioration of _Dioptricks_, where I shall enumerate

with how many several substances I have made both _Microscopes_, and

_Telescopes_, and by what and how many, ways: Let such as have leisure and

opportunity farther consider it.

The next Quæry shall be, whether by the same collection of a more dense

body then the other, or at least, of the denser part of the other, there

might not be imagin’d a reason of the apparition of some new fix’d Stars,

as those in the Swan, _Cassiope’s Charr_, _Serpentarius_, _Piscis_,

_Cetus_, &c.

Thirdly, Whether it be possible to define the height of the _Atmosphere_

from this inflection of the Rays, or from the Quicksilver Experiment of the

rarifaction or extension of the Air.

Fourthly, Whether the disparity between the upper and under Air be not

sometimes so great, as to make a reflecting superficies; I have had several

Observations which seem to have proceeded from some such cause, but it

would be too long to relate and examine them. An Experiment, also somewhat

analogous to this, I have made with Salt-water and Fresh, which two

liquors, in most Positions, seem’d the same, and not to be separated by any

determinate superficies, which separating surface yet in some other

Positions did plainly appear.

And if so, Whether the reason of the equal bounding or _terminus_ of the

under parts of the clouds may not proceed from this cause; whether,

secondly, the Reason of the apparition of many Suns may not be found out,

by considering how the Rays of the Sun may so be reflected, as to describe

a pretty true Image of the body, as we find them from any regular

Superficies. Whether also this may not be found to cause the apparition of

some of those _Parelii_, of counterfeit Suns, which appear coloured, by

refracting the Rays so, as to make the body of the Sun appear in quite

another place then really it is. But of this more elsewhere.

5. Whether the _Phænomena_ of the Clouds may not be made out by this

diversity of density in the upper and under parts of the Air, by supposing

the Air above them to be much lighter then they themselves are, and they

themselves to be yet lighter then that which is subjacent to them, many of

them seeming to be the same substance with the Cobwebs that fly in the Air

after a Fog.

Now that such a constitution of the Air and Clouds, if such there be, may

be sufficient to perform this effect, may be confirm’d by this Experiment.

Make as strong a Solution of Salt as you are able, then filling a Glass of

some depth half full with it, fill the other half with fresh Water, and

poyse a little Glass-bubble, so as that it may sink pretty quick in fresh

Water, which take and put into the aforesaid Glass, and you shall find it

to sink till it comes towards the middle, where it will remain fixt,

without moving either upwards or downwards. And by a second Experiment, of

poising such a bubble in water, whose upper part is warmer, and

consequently lighter, then the under, which is colder and heavier; the

manner of which follows in this next Quæry, which is,

6. Whether the rarifaction and condensation of Water be not made after the

same manner, as those effects are produc’d in the Air by heat; for I once

pois’d a seal’d up Glass-bubble so exactly, that never so small an addition

would make it sink, and as small a detraction make it swim, which suffering

to rest in that Vessel of Water for some time, I alwayes found it about

noon to be at the bottom of the Water, and at night, and in the morning, at

the top: Imagining this to proceed from the Rarifaction of the Water,

caus’d by the heat, I made tryal, and found most true; for I was able at

any time, either to depress, or raise it, by heat and cold; for if I let

the Pipe stand for some time in cold water, I could easily raise the Bubble

from the bottom, whither I had a little afore detruded it, by putting the

same Pipe into warm Water. And this way I have been able, for a very

considerable time, to keep a Bubble so poys’d in the Water, as that it

should remain in the middle, and neither sink, nor swim: For gently heating

the upper part of the Pipe with a Candle, Coal, or hot Iron, till I

perceived the Bubble begin to descend, then forbearing, I have observed it

to descend to such or such a station, and there to remain suspended for

some hours, till the heat by degrees were quite vanished, when it would

again ascend to its former place. This I have also often observed naturally

performed by the heat of the Air, which being able to rarifie the upper

parts of the Water sooner then the lower, by reason of its immediate

contact, the heat of the Air has sometimes so slowly increased, that I have

observed the Bubble to be some hours in passing between the top and bottom.

7. Whether the appearance of the _Pike_ of _Tenerif_, and several other

high Mountains, at so much greater a distance then seems to agree with

their respective heights, be not to be attributed to the _Curvature_ of the

visual Ray, that is made by its passing obliquely through so differingly

_Dense_ a Medium from the top to the eye very far distant in the Horizon:

For since we have already, I hope, made it very probable, that there is

such an _inflection_ of the Rays by the differing density of the parts of

the Air; and since I have found, by several Experiments made on places

comparatively not very high, and have yet found the pressure sustain’d by

those parts of the Air at the top and bottom, and also their differing

Expansions very considerable: Insomuch that I have found the pressure of

the _Atmosphere_ lighter at the top of St. _Paul_’s Steeple in _London_

(which is about two hundred foot high) then at the bottom by a sixtieth or

fiftieth part, and the expansion at the top greater then that at the bottom

by neer about so much also; for the _Mercurial Cylinder_ at the bottom was

about 39. inches, and at the top half an inch lower; the Air also included

in the Weather-glass, that at the bottom fill’d only 155. spaces, at the

top fill’d 158. though the heat at the top and bottom was found exactly the

same with a scal’d _Thermometer_: I think it very rational to suppose, that

the greatest Curvature of the Rays is made nearest the Earth, and that the

inflection of the Rays, above 3. or 4. miles upwards, is very

inconsiderable, and therefore that by this means such calculations of the

height of Mountains, as are made from the distance they are visible in the

Horizon, from the supposal that that Ray is a straight Line (that from the

top of the Mountain is, as ’twere, a Tangent to the Horizon whence it is

seen) which really is a _Curve_, is very erroneous. Whence, I suppose,

proceeds the reason of the exceedingly differing Opinions and Assertions of

several Authors, about the height of several very high Hills.

8. Whether this Inflection of the Air will not very much alter the supposed

distances of the Planets, which seem to have a very great dependence upon

the Hypothetical refraction or inflection of the Air, and that refraction

upon the hypothetical height and density of the Air: For since (as I hope)

I have here shewn the Air to be quite otherwise then has been hitherto

suppos’d, by manifesting it to be, both of a vast, at least an uncertain,

height, and of an unconstant and irregular density; It must necessarily

follow, that its inflection must be varied accordingly: And therefore we

may hence learn, upon what sure grounds all the Astronomers hitherto have

built, who have calculated the distance of the Planets from their

Horizontal _Parallax_; for since the Refraction and _Parallax_ are so

nearly ally’d, that the one cannot be known without the other, especially

by any wayes that have been yet attempted, how uncertain must the

_Parallax_ be, when the Refraction is unknown? And how easie is it for

Astronomers to assign what distance they please to the Planets, and defend

them, when they have such a curious _subterfuge_ as that of Refraction,

wherein a very little variation will allow them liberty enough to place the

Celestial Bodies at what distance they please.

If therefore we would come to any certainty in this point, we must go other

wayes to work; and as I have here examined the height and refractive

property of the Air by other wayes then are usual, so must we find the

Parallax of the Planets by wayes not yet practiced; and to this end, I

cannot imagine any better way, then the Observations of them by two persons

at very far distant parts of the Earth, that lye as neer as may be under

the same Meridian, or Degree of longitude, but differing as much in

latitude, as there can be places conveniently found: These two persons, at

certain appointed times, should (as near as could be) both at the same

time, observe the way of the _Moon_, _Mars_, _Venus_, _Jupiter_, and

_Saturn_, amongst the fixt Stars, with a good large _Telescope_, and making

little Iconismes, or pictures, of the small fixed Stars, that appear to

each of them to lye in or near the way of the Center of the Planet, and the

exact measure of the apparent Diameter; from the comparing of such

Observations together, we might certainly know the true distance, or

Parallax, of the Planet. And having any one true Parallax of these Planets,

we might very easily have the other by their apparent Diameters, which the

_Telescope_ likewise affords us very accurately. And thence their motions

might be much better known, and their Theories more exactly regulated. And

for this purpose I know not any one place more convenient for such an

Observation to be made in, then in the Island of St. _Helena_, upon the

Coast of _Africk_, which lyes about sixteen degrees to the Southwards of

the Line, and is very near, according to the latest Geographical Maps, in

the same Meridian with _London_; for though they may not perhaps lye

exactly in the same, yet their Observations, being ordered according to

what I shall anon shew, it will not be difficult to find the true distance

of the Planet. But were they both under the same Meridian, it would be much

better.

And because Observations may be much easier, and more accurately made with

good _Telescopes_, then with any other Instruments, it will not, I suppose,

seem impertinent to explain a little what wayes I judge most fit and

convenient for that particular. Such therefore as shall be the Observators

for this purpose, should be furnished with the best _Telescopes_ that can

be had, the longer the better and more exact will their Observations be,

though they are somewhat the more difficultly manag’d. These should be

fitted with a _Rete_, or divided Scale, plac’d at such a distance within

the Eye-glass, that they may be distinctly seen, which should be the

measures of minutes and seconds; by this Instrument each Observator should,

at certain prefixt times, observe the Moon, or other Planet, in, or very

near, the Meridian; and because it may be very difficult to find two

convenient stations that will happen to be just under the same Meridian,

they shall, each of them, observe the way of the Planet, both for an hour

before, and an hour after, it arrive at the Meridian; and by a line, or

stroke, amongst the small fixed Stars, they shall denote out the way that

each of them observ’d the Center of the Planet to be mov’d in for those two

hours: These Observations each of them shall repeat for many dayes

together, that both it may happen, that both of them may sometimes make

their Observations together, and that from divers Experiments we may be the

better assured of what certainty and exactness such kind of Observations

are like to prove. And because many of the Stars which may happen to come

within the compass of such an _Iconism_, or Map, may be such as are only

visible through a good _Telescope_, whose Positions perhaps have not been

noted, nor their longitudes, or latitudes, any where remarked; therefore

each Observator should indeavour to insert some fixt Star, whose longitude,

and latitude, is known; or with his _Telescope_ he shall find the Position

of some notable _telescopical_ Star, inserted in his Map, to some known

fixt Star, whose place in the _Zodiack_ is well defin’d.

Having by this means found the true distance of the Moon, and having

observed well the _apparent Diameter_ of it at that time with a good

_Telescope_, it is easie enough, by one single Observation of the apparent

Diameter of the Moon with a good Glass, to determine her distances in any

other part of her _Orbit_, or _Dragon_, and consequently, some few

Observations will tell us, whether she be mov’d in an _Ellipsis_, (which,

by the way, may also be found, even now, though I think we are yet ignorant

of her true distance) and next (which without such Observations, I think,

we shall not be sure of) we may know exactly the bigness of that

_Ellipsis_, or Circle, and her true velocity in each part, and thereby be

much the better inabled to find out the true cause of all her Motions. And

though, even now also, we may, by such Observations in one station, as here

at _London_, observe the _apparent Diameter_ and motion of the Moon in her

_Dragon_, and consequently be inabled to make a better ghess at the

_Species_ or kind of Curve, in which she is mov’d, that is, whether it be

sphærical, or _elliptical_, or neither, and with what proportional

velocities she is carried in that Curve; yet till her true _Parallax_ be

known, we cannot determine either.

Next, for the true distance of the Sun, the best way will be, by accurate

Observations, made in both these forementioned stations, of some convenient

Eclipse of the Sun, many of which may so happen, as to be seen by both; for

the _Penumbra_ of the Moon may, if she be sixty Semidiameters distant from

the Earth, and the Sun above seven thousand, extend to about seventy

degrees on the Earth, and consequently be seen by Observators as far

distant as _London_, and St. _Helena_, which are not full sixty nine

degrees distant. And this would much more accurately, then any way that has

been yet used, determine the Parallax, and distance, of the Sun; for as for

the Horizontal Parallax I have already shewn it sufficiently uncertain; nor

is the way of finding it by the Eclipse of the Moon any other then

hypothetical; and that by the difference of the true and apparent

quadrature of the Moon is not less uncertain, witness their Deductions from

it, who have made use of it; for _Vendeline_ puts that difference to be but

4′.30″. whence he deduces a vast distance of the Sun, as I have before

shewn. _Ricciolo_ makes it full 30′.00. but _Reinoldus_, and _Kircher_, no

less then three degrees. And no wonder, for if we examine the _Theory_, we

shall find it so complicated with uncertainties.

First, From the irregular surface of the Moon, and from several Parallaxes,

that unless the _Dichotomy_ happen in the _Nonagesimus_ of the _Ecliptick_,

and that in the Meridian, &c. all which happen so very seldom, that it is

almost impossible to make them otherwise then uncertainly. Besides, we are

not yet certain, but that there may be somewhat about the Moon _analogus_

to the Air about the Earth, which may cause a refraction of the light of

the Sun, and consequently make a great difference in the apparent

_dichotomy_ of the Moon. Their way indeed is very rational and ingenious;

and such as is much to be preferred before the way by the Horizontal

Parallax, could all the uncertainties be remov’d, and were the true

distance of the Moon known.

But because we find by the Experiments of _Vendiline_, _Reinoldus_, &c.

that Observations of this kind are very uncertain also: It were to be

wisht, that such kind of Observations, made at two very distant stations,

were promoted. And it is so much the more desirable, because, from what I

have now shewn of the nature of the Air, it is evident, that the refraction

may be very much greater then all the Astronomers hitherto have imagined

it: And consequently, that the distance of the Moon, and other Planets, may

be much lesse then what they have hitherto made it.

For first, this Inflection, I have here propounded, will allow the shadow

of the Earth to be much shorter then it can be made by the other

_Hypothesis_ of refraction, and consequently, the Moon will not suffer an

Eclipse, unless it comes very much nearer the Earth then the Astronomers

hitherto have supposed it.

Secondly, There will not in this _Hypothesis_ be any other shadow of the

Earth, such as _Kepler_ supposes, and calls the _Penumbra_, which is the

shadow of the refracting _Atmosphere_; for the bending of the Rays being

altogether caus’d by _Inflection_, as I have already shewn, all that part

which is ascribed by _Kepler_, and others after him, to the _Penumbra_, or

dark part, which is without the _umbra terræ_, does clear vanish; for in

this _Hypothesis_ there is no refracting surface of the Air, and

consequently there can be no shadows, such as appear in the ninth Figure of

the 37. _Scheme_, where let ABCD represent the Earth, and EFGH the

_Atmosphere_, which according to _Keplers_ supposition, is like a Sphære of

Water terminated with an exact surface EFGH, let the lines MF, LB, ID, KH,

represent the Rays of the Sun; ’tis manifest, that all the Rayes between

LB, and ID, will be reflected by the surface of the Earth BAD, and

consequently, the conical space BOD would be dark and obscure; but, say the

followers of _Kepler_, the Rays between MF, and LB, and between ID, and KH,

falling on the _Atmosphere_, are refracted, both at their ingress and

egress out of the _Atmosphere_, nearer towards the Axis of the sphærical

shadow CO, and consequently, inlighten a great part of that former dark

Cone, and shorten, and contract, its top to N. And because of this

Reflection of these Rays, say they, there is superinduc’d another shell of

a dark Cone FPH, whose Apex P is yet further distant from the Earth: By

this _Penumbra_, say they, the Moon is Eclipsed, for it alwayes passes

between the lines 12, and 34.

To which I say, That if the Air be such, as I have newly shewn it to be,

and consequently cause such an inflection of the Rays that fall into it,

those dark _Penumbra’s_ FYZQ, HXVT, and ORPS, will all vanish. For if we

suppose the Air indefinitely extended, and to be no where bounded with a

determinate refracting surface, as I have shewn it uncapable of having,

from the nature of it; it will follow, that the Moon will no where be

totally obscured, but when it is below the Apex N, of the dark blunt Cone

of the Earth’s shadow: Now, from the supposition, that the Sun is distant

about seven thousand Diameters, the point N, according to calculation,

being not above twenty five terrestrial Semidiameters from the Center of

the Earth: It follows, that whensoever the Moon eclipsed is totally

darkned, without affording any kind of light, it must be within twenty five

Semidiameters of the Earth, and consequently much lower then any

Astronomers have hitherto put it.

This will seem much more consonant to the rest of the secundary Planets;

for the highest of _Jupiter’s_ Moons is between twenty and thirty _Jovial

Semidiameters_ distant from the Center of _Jupiter_; and the Moons of

_Saturn_ much about the same number of _Saturnial Semidiameters_ from the

Center of that Planet.

But these are but conjectures also, and must be determin’d by such kind of

Observations as I have newly mention’d.

Nor will it be difficult, by this _Hypothesis_, to salve all the

appearances of Eclipses of the Moon, for in this _Hypothesis_ also, there

will be on each side of the shadow of the Earth, a _Penumbra_, not caus’d

by the Refraction of the Air, as in the _Hypothesis_ of _Kepler_; but by

the faint inlightning of it by the Sun: For if, in the sixth Figure, we

suppose ESQ, and GSR, to be the Rays that terminate the shadow from either

side of the Earth; ESQ coming from the upper limb of the Sun, and GSR from

the under; it will follow, that the shadow of the Earth, within those Rays,

that is, the Cone GSE, will be totally dark. But the Sun being not a point,

but a large _area_ of light, there will be a secondary dark Cone of shadow

EPG, which will be caus’d by the earth’s hindring part of the Rays of the

Sun from falling on the parts GPR, and EPQ, of which halved shadow, or

_Penumbra_, that part will appear brightest which lyes nearest the

terminating Rayes GP, and EP, and those darker that lye nearest to GS, and

ES: when therefore the Moon appears quite dark in the middle of the

Eclipse, she must be below S, that is, between S and F; when she appears

lighter near the middle of the Eclipse, she must pass some where between RQ

and S; and when she is alike light through the whole Eclipse, she must pass

between RQ, and P.

* * * * *

Observ. LIX. _Of multitudes of small _Stars_ discoverable by the

_Telescope_._

Having, in the last Observation, premis’d some particulars observable in

the _medium_, through which we must look upon _Cœlestial_ Objects, I shall

here add one Observation of the Bodies themselves; and for a _specimen_ I

have made choice of the _Pleiades_, or seven Stars, commonly so called

(though in our time and Climate there appear no more then six to the naked

eye) and this I did the rather, because the deservedly famous _Galileo_,

having publisht a Picture of this _Asterisme_, was able, it seems, with his

Glass to discover no more then thirty six, whereas with a pretty good

twelve foot _Telescope_, by which I drew this 38 _Iconism_, I could very

plainly discover seventy eight, placed in the order they are ranged in the

Figure, and of as many differing Magnitudes as the _Asterisks_, wherewith

they are Marked, do specifie; there being no less then fourteen several

Magnitudes of those Stars, which are compris’d within the draught, the

biggest whereof is not accounted greater then one of the third Magnitude;

and indeed that account is much too big, if it be compared with other Stars

of the third Magnitude, especially by the help of a _Telescope_; for then

by it may be perceiv’d, that its splendor, to the naked eye, may be

somewhat augmented by the three little Stars immediately above it, which

are near adjoyning to it. The _Telescope_ also discovers a great variety,

even in the bigness of those, commonly reckon’d, of the first, second,

third, fourth, fifth, and sixth Magnitude; so that should they be

distinguish’d thereby, those six Magnitudes would, at least, afford no less

then thrice that number of Magnitudes, plainly enough distinguishable by

their Magnitude, and brightness; so that a good twelve foot Glass would

afford us no less then twenty five several Magnitudes. Nor are these all,

but a longer Glass does yet further, both more nicely distinguish the

Magnitudes of those already noted, and also discover several other of

smaller Magnitudes, not discernable by the twelve foot Glass: Thus have I

been able, with a good thirty six foot Glass, to discover many more Stars

in the _Pleiades_ then are here delineated, and those of three or four

distinct Magnitudes less then any of those spots of the fourteenth

Magnitude. And by the twinkling of divers other places of this _Asterisme_,

when the Sky was very clear, I am apt to think, that with longer Glasses,

or such as would bear a bigger _aperture_, there might be discovered

multitudes of other small Stars, yet inconspicuous. And indeed, for the

discovery of small Stars, the bigger the _aperture_ be, the better adapted

is the Glass; for though perhaps it does make the several specks more

radiant, and glaring, yet by that means, uniting more Rays very near to one

point, it does make many of those radiant points conspicuous, which, by

putting on a less _aperture_, may be found to vanish; and therefore, both

for the discovery of the fixt Star, and for finding the _Satellites_ of

_Jupiter_, before it be out of the day, or twilight, I alwayes leave the

Object-glass as clear without any _aperture_ as I can, and have thereby

been able to discover the _Satellites_ a long while before; I was able to

discern them, when the smaller _apertures_ were put on; and at other times,

to see multitudes of other smaller Stars, which a smaller _aperture_ makes

to disappear.

In that notable _Asterism_ also of the Sword of _Orion_, where the

ingenious Monsieur _Hugens van Zulichem_ has discovered only three little

Stars in a cluster, I have with a thirty six foot Glass, without any

_aperture_ (the breadth of the Glass being about some three inches and a

half) discover’d five, and the twinkling of divers others up and down in

divers parts of that small milky Cloud.

So that ’tis not unlikely, but that the meliorating of _Telescopes_ will

afford as great a variety of new Discoveries in the Heavens, as better

_Microscopes_ would among small terrestrial Bodies, and both would give us

infinite cause, more and more to admire the omnipotence of the Creator.

* * * * *

Micrographia Some Physiological Descriptions of Minute Bodies Made by Magnifying Glasses with Observations and Inquiries Thereupon · 第 77 / 80 题