Observ. XV. _Of _Kettering-stone_, and of the pores of _Inanimate_ bodies._

[13]This Stone which is brought from _Kettering_ in _Northampton-Shire_,

and digg’d out of a Quarry, as I am inform’d, has a grain altogether

admirable, nor have I ever seen or heard of any other stone that has the

like. It is made up of an innumerable company of small bodies, not all of

the same cize or shape, but for the most part, not much differing from a

Globular form, nor exceed they one another in Diameter above three or four

times; they appear to the eye, like the Cobb or Ovary of a _Herring_, or

some smaller fishes, but for the most part, the particles seem somewhat

less, and not so uniform; but their variation from a perfect globular ball,

seems to be only by the pressure of the _contiguous_ bals which have a

little deprest and protruded those toucht sides inward, and forc’d the

other sides as much outwards beyond the limits of a Globe; just as it would

happen, if a heap of exactly round Balls of soft Clay were heaped upon one

another; or, as I have often seen a heap of small Globules of

_Quicksilver_, reduc’d to that form by rubbing it much in a glaz’d Vessel,

with some slimy or sluggish liquor, such as Spittle, when though the top of

the upper Globules be very neer spherical, yet those that are prest upon by

others, exactly imitate the forms of these lately mention’d grains.

Where these grains touch each other, they are so firmly united or settled

together, that they seldom part without breaking a hole in one or th’other

of them, such as a, a, a, b, c, c, &c. Some of which fractions, as a, a, a,

a, where the touch has been but light, break no more then the outward

crust, or first shell of the stone, which is of a white colour, a little

dash’d with a brownish Yellow, and is very thin, like the shell of an Egg:

and I have seen some of those grains perfectly resemble some kind of Eggs,

both in colour and shape: But where the union of the _contiguous granules_

has been more firm, there the divulsion has made a greater Chasm, as at b,

b, b, in so much that I have observ’d some of them quite broken in two, as

at c, c, c, which has discovered to me a further resemblance they have to

Eggs, they having an appearance of a white and yelk, by two differing

substances that envelope and encompass each other.

That which we may call the white was pretty whitish neer the yelk, but more

duskie towards the shell; some of them I could plainly perceive to be shot

or radiated like a _Pyrites_ or _fire-stone_; the yelk in some I saw

hollow, in others fill’d with a duskie brown and porous substance like a

kind of pith.

The small pores, or _interstitia_ eeee betwixt the Globules, I plainly saw,

and found by other trials to be every way pervious to air and water, for I

could blow through a piece of this stone of a considerable thickness, as

easily as I have blown through a Cane, which minded me of the pores which

_Des Cartes_ allow his _materia subtilis_ between the _æthereal_ globules.

The object, through the _Microscope_, appears like a _Congeries_ or heap of

Pibbles, such as I have often seen cast up on the shore, by the working of

the Sea after a great storm, or like (in shape, though not colour) a

company of small Globules of Quicksilver, look’d on with a _Microscope_,

when reduc’d into that form by the way lately mentioned. And perhaps, this

last may give some hint at the manner of the formation of the former: For

supposing some _Lapidescent_ substance to be generated, or some way brought

(either by some commixture of bodies in the Sea it self, or protruded in,

perhaps, out of some _subterraneous_ caverns) to the bottom of the Sea, and

there remaining in the form of a liquor like Quicksilver, _heterogeneous_

to the ambient _Saline_ fluid, it may by the working and tumblings of the

Sea to and fro be jumbled and comminuted into such Globules as may

afterwards be hardned into Flints, the lying of which one upon another,

when in the Sea, being not very hard, by reason of the weight of the

incompassing fluid, may cause the undermost to be a little, though not

much, varied from a globular Figure. But this only by the by.

After what manner this _Kettering-stone_ should be generated I cannot

learn, having never been there to view the place, and observe the

circumstances; but it seems to me from the structure of it to be generated

from some substance once more fluid, and afterwards by degrees growing

harder, almost after the same manner as I supposed the generation of Flints

to be made.

But whatever were the cause of its curious texture, we may learn this

information from it; that even in those things which we account vile, rude,

and coorse, Nature has not been wanting to shew abundance of curiosity and

excellent Mechanisme.

We may here find a Stone by help of a _Microscope_, to be made up of

abundance of small Balls, which do but just touch each other, and yet there

being so many contacts, they make a firm hard mass, or a Stone much harder

then Free-stone.

Next, though we can by a _Microscope_ discern so curious a shape in the

particles, yet to the naked eye there scarce appears any such thing; which

may afford us a good argument to think, that even in those bodies also,

whose _texture_ we are not able to discern, though help’d with

_Microscopes_, there may be yet _latent_ so curious a _Schematisme_, that

it may abundantly satisfie the curious searcher, who shall be so happy as

to find some way to discover it.

Next, we here find a Stone, though to the naked eye a very close one, yet

every way perforated with innumerable pores, which are nothing else but the

_interstitia_, between those multitudes of minute globular particles, that

compose the bulk it self, and these pores are not only discover’d by the

_Microscope_, but by this contrivance.

I took a pretty large piece of this stone, and covering it all over with

cement, save only at two opposite parts, I found my self able, by blowing

in at one end that was left open, to blow my spittle, with which I had wet

the other end, into abundance of bubbles, which argued these pores to be

open and pervious through the whole stone, which affords us a very pretty

instance of the porousness of some seemingly close bodies, of which kind I

shall anon have occasion to subjoyn many more, tending to prove the same

thing.

I must not here omit to take notice, that in this body there is not a

_vegetative_ faculty that should so contrive this structure for any

peculiar use of _Vegetation_ or growth, whereas in the other instances of

vegetable porous bodies, there is an _anima_ or _forma informans_, that

does contrive all the Structures and _Mechanisms_ of the constituting

body, to make them subservient and usefull to the great Work or Function

they are to perform. And so I ghess the pores in Wood, and other

vegetables, in bones, and other Animal substances, to be as so many

channels, provided by the Great and Alwise Creator, for the conveyance of

appropriated juyces to particular parts. And therefore, that this may tend,

or be pervious all towards one part, and may have impediments, as valves or

the like, to any other; but in this body we have very little reason so

suspect there should be any such design, for it is equally pervious every

way, not onely forward, but backwards, and side-ways, and seems indeed much

rather to be _Homogeneous_ or similar to those pores, which we may with

great probability believe to be the channels of _pellucid_ bodies, not

directed, or more open any one way, then any other, being equally pervious

every way. And, according as these pores are more or greater in respect of

the _interstitial_ bodies, the more transparent are the so constituted

concretes; and the smaller those pores are, the weaker is the _Impulse_ of

light communicated through them, though the more quick be the progress.

Upon this Occasion, I hope it will not be altogether unseasonable, if I

propound my conjectures and _Hypothesis_ about the _medium_ and conveyance

of light.

I suppose then, that the greatest part of the _Interstitia_ of the world,

that lies between the bodies of the Sun and Starrs, and the Planets, and

the Earth, to be an exceeding fluid body, very apt and ready to be mov’d,

and to communicate the motion of any one part to any other part, though

never so far distant: Nor do I much concern my self, to determine what the

Figure of the particles of this exceedingly subtile fluid _medium_ must be,

nor whether it have any interstitiated pores or vacuities, it being

sufficient to solve all the _Phænomena_ to suppose it an exceedingly fluid,

or the most fluid body in the world, and as yet impossible to determine the

other difficulties.

That being so exceeding fluid a body, it easily gives passage to all other

bodies to move to and fro in it.

That it neither receives from any of its parts, or from other bodies; nor

communicates to any of its parts, or to any other body, any impulse, or

motion in a direct line, that is not of a determinate quickness. And that

when the motion is of such determinate swiftness, it both receives, and

communicates, or propagates an impulse or motion to any imaginable distance

in streight lines, with an unimaginable celerity and vigour.

That all kind of solid bodies consist of pretty massie particles in respect

of the particles of this fluid _medium_, which in many places do so touch

each other, that none of this fluid _medium_ interposes much after the same

manner (to use a gross similitude) as a heap of great stones compose one

great _congeries_ or mass in the midst of the water.

That all fluid bodies which we may call _tangible_, are nothing but some

more subtile parts of those particles, that serve to constitute all

_tangible_ bodies.

That the water, and such other fluid bodies, are nothing but a _congeries_

of particles agitated or made fluid by it in the same manner as the

particles of _Salt_ are agitated or made fluid by a parcel of water, in

which they are dissolv’d, and subsiding to the bottom of it, constitute a

fluid body, much more massie and dense, and less fluid then the pure water

it self.

That the air on the other side is a certain company of particles of quite

another kind, that is, such as are very much smaller, and more easily

moveable by the motion of this fluid _medium_; much like those very subtile

parts of _Cochenel_, other very deep tinging bodies, where by a very small

parcel of matter is able to tinge and diffuse it self over a very great

quantity of the fluid dissolvent; or somewhat after that manner, as smoak,

and such like minute bodies, or steams, are observ’d to tinge a very great

quantity of air; onely this last similitude is deficient in one propriety,

and that is a perpetuity or continuance in that state of commixture with

the air, but the former does more nearly approach to the nature and manner

of the air’s being dissolv’d by this fluid or _Æther_. And this Similitude

will further hold in these proprieties; that as those tinctures may be

increased by certain bodies, so may they be precipitated by others, as I

shall afterwards shew it to be very probable, that the like accidents

happen even to the Air it self.

Further, as these solutions and tinctures do alter the nature of these

fluid bodies, as to their aptness to propagate a motion or impulse through

them, even so does the particles of the Air, Water, and other fluid bodies,

and of Glass, Crystal, &c. which are commixt with this bulk of the _Æther_

alter the motion of the propagated pulse of light; that is, where these

more bulkie particles are more plentifull, and consequently a lesser

quantity of the _Æther_ between them to be mov’d, there the motion must

necessarily be the swifter, though not so robust, which will produce those

effects, which I have (I hope) with some probability, ascribed to it in the

digression about Colours, at the end of the _Observations_ on

_Muscovy-glass._

Now, that other Stones, and those which have the closest and hardest

textures, and seem (as far as we are able to discover with our eyes, though

help’d with the best _Microscopes_) freest from pores, are yet

notwithstanding replenish’d with them, an Instance or two will, I suppose,

make more probable.

A very solid and unflaw’d piece of cleer white _Marble_, if it be well

polish’d and glaz’d, has so curiously smooth a surface, that the best and

most polish’d surface of any wrought-glass, seems not to the naked eye, nor

through a _Microscope_, to be more smooth, and less porous. And yet, that

this hard close body is replenish’d with abundance of pores, I think these

following Experiments will sufficiently prove.

The first is, That if you take such a piece, and for a pretty while boyl it

in Turpentine and Oyl of Turpentine, you shall find that the stone will be

all imbu’d with it; and whereas before it look’d more white, but more

opacous, now it will look more greasie, but be much more transparent, and

if you let it lie but a little while, and then break off a part of it, you

shall find the unctuous body to have penetrated it to such a determinate

depth every way within the surface. This may be yet easier try’d with a

piece of the same _Marble_, a little warm’d in the fire, and then a little

Pitch or Tarr melted on the top of it; for these black bodies, by their

insinuating themselves into the invisible pores of the stone, ting it with

so black a hue, that there can be no further doubt of the truth of this

assertion, that it abounds with small imperceptible pores.

Now, that other bodies will also sink into the pores of _Marble_, besides

unctuous, I have try’d, and found, that a very Blue tincture made in

_spirit of Urine_ would very readily and easily sink into it, as would also

several tinctures drawn with _spirit of Wine_.

Nor is _Marble_ the only seemingly close stone, which by other kinds of

Experiments may be found porous; for I have by this kind of Experiment on

divers other stones found much the same effect, and in some, indeed much

more notable. Other stones I have found so porous, that with the

_Microscope_ I could perceive several small winding holes, much like

Worm-holes, as I have noted in some kind of _Purbeck-stone_, by looking on

the surface of a piece newly flaw’d off, for if otherwise, the surface has

been long expos’d to the Air, or has been scraped with any tool, those

small caverns are fill’d with dust, and disappear.

And to confirm this _Conjecture_, yet further, I shall here insert an

excellent account, given into the _Royal Society_ by that Eminently Learned

Physician, Doctor _Goddard_, of an Experiment, not less instructive then

curious and accurate, made by himself on a very hard and seemingly close

stone call’d _Oculus Mundi_, as I find it preserv’d in the Records of that

Honourable Society.

A small stone of the kind, call’d by some Authours, _Oculus Mundi_,

being dry and cloudy, weigh’d 5²⁰⁹⁄₂₅₆ _Grains_.

The same put under water for a night, and somewhat more, became

transparent, and the superficies being wiped dry, weighed 6³⁄₂₅₆

_Grains_.

The difference between these two weights, 0⁵⁰⁄₂₅₆ of a _Grain_.

The same Stone kept out of water one Day and becoming cloudy again

weighed, 5²²⁵⁄₂₅₆ _Graines_.

Which was more then the first weight, 0¹⁶⁄₂₅₆ of a _Grain_.

The same being kept two Days longer weighed, 5²⁰²⁄₂₅₆ _Graines_.

Which was less then at first, 0⁷⁄₂₅₆ a _Grain_.

Being kept dry something longer it did not grow sensibly lighter.

Being put under water for a night and becoming again transparent and

wiped dry, the weight was, _6³⁄₂₅₆ Grains_, the same with the first

after putting in water, and more then the last weight after keeping of

it dry, 0⁵⁷⁄₂₅₆ of a _Grain_.

Another Stone of the same kind being variegated with milky _white_ and

_gray_ like some sorts of _Agates_, while it lay under water, was

alwaies invironed with little Bubbles, such as appear in water a little

before boyling, next the sides of the Vessel.

There were also some the like Bubbles on the Surface of the water just

over it, as if either some exhalations came out of it, or that it did

excite some fermentation in the parts of the water contiguous to it.

There was little sensible difference in the transparency of this Stone,

before the putting under water, and after: To be sure the milky-_white_

parts continued as before, but more difference in weight then in the

former. For whereas before the putting into the water the weight was

18⁹⁷⁄₁₂₈ _Graines_. After it had lyen in about four and twenty hours

the weight was 20²⁷⁄₁₂₈ _Graines_, so the difference was, 1⁵⁸⁄₁₂₈

_Graines_.

The same Stone was infused in the water scalding hot, and so continued

for a while after it was cold, but got no more weight then upon

infusing in the cold, neither was there any sensible Difference in the

weight both times.

In which Experiment, there are three Observables that seem very manifestly

to prove the porousness of these seemingly close bodies: the first is their

acquiring a transparency, and losing their whiteness after steeping in

water, which will seem the more strongly to argue it, if what I have

already said about the making transparent, or clarifying of some bodies, as

the white powder of beaten Glass, and the froth of some glutinous

transparent liquor be well consider’d; for thereby it will seem rational to

think that this transparency arises from the insinuation of the water

(which has much the same refraction with such stony particles, as may be

discover’d by Sand view’d with a _Microscope_) into those pores which were

formerly repleat with air (that has a very differing refraction, and

consequently is very reflective) which seems to be confirm’d by the second

Observable, namely, the increase of weight after keeping, and decrease upon

drying. And thirdly, seem’d yet more sensibly confirm’d by the multitude of

bubbles in the last Experiment.

We find also most Acid Salts very readily to dissolve and separate the

parts of this body one from another; which is yet a further Argument to

confirm the porousness of bodies, and will serve as such, to shew that even

Glass also has an abundance of pores in it, since there are several

liquors, that with long staying in a Glass, will so _Corrode_ and eat into

it, as at last, to make it pervious to the liquor it contain’d, of which I

have seen very many Instances.

Since therefore we find by other proofs, that many of those bodies which we

think the most solid ones, and appear so to our sight, have notwithstanding

abundance of those grosser kind of pores, which will admit several kinds of

liquors into them, why should we not believe that Glass, and all other

transparent bodies abound with them, since we have many other arguments,

besides the propagation of light, which seem to argue for it?

And whereas it may be objected, that the propagation of light is no

argument that there are those atomical pores in glass, since there are

_Hypotheses_ plausible enough to solve those _Phænomena_, by supposing the

pulse onely to be communicated through the transparent body.

To this I answer, that that _Hypothesis_ which the industrious _Mersennus_

has publish’d about the slower motion of the end of a Ray in a denser

_medium_, then in a more rare and thin, seems altogether unsufficient to

solve abundance of _Phænomena_, of which this is not the least

considerable, that it is impossible from that supposition, that any colours

should be generated from the refraction of the Rays; for since by that

_Hypothesis_ the _undulating pulse_ is always carried perpendicular, or at

right angles with the Ray or Line of direction, it follows, that the stroke

of the pulse of light, after it has been once or twice refracted (through a

Prisme, for example) must affect the eye with the same kind of stroke as if

it had not been refracted at all. Nor will it be enough for a Defendant of

that _Hypothesis_, to say, that perhaps it is because the refractions have

made the Rays more weak, for if so, then two refractions in the two

parallel sides of a _Quadrangular Prisme_ would produce colours, but we

have no such _Phænomena_ produc’d.

There are several Arguments that I could bring to evince that there are in

all transparent bodies such atomical pores. And that there is such a fluid

body as I am arguing for, which is the _medium_, or Instrument, by which

the pulse of Light is convey’d from the _lucid body_ to the enlightn’d. But

that it being a digression from the Observations I was recording, about the

Pores of _Kettering-Stone_, it would be too much such, if I should protract

it too long; and therefore I shall proceed to the next _Observation_.

* * * * *

Micrographia Some Physiological Descriptions of Minute Bodies Made by Magnifying Glasses with Observations and Inquiries Thereupon · 第 44 / 80 题